Hes probably running on stock internals with the stock ported heads and stock cam. So he can run too much boost. With some engine work and a good port job, this car could be in the 700-900ho range or more. This really is not bad for running a stock bottom end
@misfit2910 yeah, it is a totally stock bottom end and heads/cam. my best totals were 515 rwhp 528 ft/lbs torque. unfortunately i blew this whole setup at the track, now its just bottle fed.
Hes probably running on stock internals with the stock ported heads and stock cam. So he can run too much boost. With some engine work and a good port job, this car could be in the 700-900ho range or more. This really is not bad for running a stock bottom end
misfit2910 11 months ago
@misfit2910 yeah, it is a totally stock bottom end and heads/cam. my best totals were 515 rwhp 528 ft/lbs torque. unfortunately i blew this whole setup at the track, now its just bottle fed.
GAteddybear 11 months ago
I made more on low boost and 91 craptane and 2 less cylinders. lol
BigBadTurboM3 2 years ago
sounds like crap
micdmechanic2010 2 years ago
no mames se necicitata ser wuey para no ver que solo es una foto y el sonido se lo agregaste no mames.
reiseck 3 years ago
si usted reloj, en el extremo usted ve el coche sacudir, fue atado muy firmemente a un dyno, así que no se movió mucho
GAteddybear 3 years ago
Can have all the horse and torque it wants, it's still one heavy car, although it looks good.
panzerphoenix 3 years ago
sick stang lose that prop tho bra, ruins the engine view ;)
jdhinds1234 3 years ago
nice car man
turbotaurus90 3 years ago 3
sick
doug1bite 3 years ago 2