actually I believe that FIRStT wanted to, but vex wanted to continue with their own challenge and did not want another challenge using the same parts so now we use tetrix. I have to say, though, tetrix is more sturdy and allows more design differences (in my opinion)
This would be a good alternative for schools that can't get the funding for a full fledged robotics team. If they limit the number of students to 10 per team and only 2 - 3 mentors per team, a lot of schools will have to have more than one team. That could be a financial challenge or hardship for small schools.
1:02 , I know the feeling.
saikodetsu55 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get your free profile and meet BBW women at BBW dating site naneedj.info
leilazmedros 9 months ago
I'm in FLL, and am totaly doing this in high school!
Cameronthenerd 2 years ago
@Cameronthenerd If your school has FRC it is 3x the fun!!
ausernamenonewants 1 year ago
actually I believe that FIRStT wanted to, but vex wanted to continue with their own challenge and did not want another challenge using the same parts so now we use tetrix. I have to say, though, tetrix is more sturdy and allows more design differences (in my opinion)
asadarath 2 years ago
I'm for vex since it's more complex(more motors/sensors). In a few days I'm starting a VeX team, but it would be cool if it was run by FTC.
a2304 2 years ago
im in FRC robotics at my school! i really want to stay involved with robotics! i love it! and i love the competition events! they are so much fun!
MoJaSa15 2 years ago 2
This would be a good alternative for schools that can't get the funding for a full fledged robotics team. If they limit the number of students to 10 per team and only 2 - 3 mentors per team, a lot of schools will have to have more than one team. That could be a financial challenge or hardship for small schools.
beachmom561 2 years ago
should have kept vex
TDAWizard 2 years ago
agreed
ladakn 2 years ago