Global warming is a complete lie. The only solution is to tax everything that has to do with co2 even your own breath... common America were much smarter than this shim-sham. This is about power, money and control which only a selected few benefit and get filthy stupid rich.
@rrought317 look, I'm a chemical engineer, and i'm afraid you are ignoring scientific data. the problem is not "co2", it is greenhouse gases, gases that have higher radiative properties. Yes, co2 is a natural component of the atmosphere, but it is natural as long as its concentration does not exceed around a 12% in volume. When its concentration exceeds this amount it starts altering the radiative properties of air, and it contributes to trapping solar radiation. Its fact, not fiction.
@sirdelrio look, I'm a electronics engineer by degree and I've taken geology courses for the API. Bottom line, I don't care what the false consensus claims from the IPCC are, what is clear is Maurice Strong was the founder of this whole global warming hoax and this man is a fraud. Climate change is natural and to say that humans are the cause of this, then maybe you're the one that's misinformed. The human race is a beautiful thing, don't be dehumanized by the eugenics freaks from the UN.
@rrought317 what I meant is that being a chemical engineer, environmental science is one of my fields of expertise. I'm not misinformed, I teach college level environmental science courses. Yes, climate change is natural, BUT excesive combustion gases (co2, cfc, NOx, SO2) affect the radiative properties in the atmosphere, and it leads to a greater warming effect, the greenhouse effect.
@sirdelrio I'm not trying to discredit you in any way, your skills and trades are important to society and humanity. Who and where are your sources on this claim? Do you think a global tax paid to the IMF bank owned by the Rothschilds's will actually prevent or help climate change?
@rrought317 It is incredible that the US, the only country in the world that won't accept global warming, also the greatest producer of greenhouse gases, is the only one to promote in his ultra-conservative media, the "fraud" of global warming. You americans should compare the degree of impartiality of your journalism with those of other continents to realize that in your country media are not to inform but to serve political interests.
Lost all credability Keith you are a one sided fool. Improve our trade debt GREEN ENERGY!LOL! What does green energy put out to improve GDP? Were're going to have to import all metals, semiconductors, and labor from China, Can't maufacture all that raw material here in the US because of carbon credits. Keith is a complete fool and it just goes to show Americans that you can't believe nothing the mainstream reports.
why is it that we're the only industrialized nation not make a strong move towards alternative energy? china for example is moving very aggressively. are all the nations fools but us?
Companies are taxed outrageously to the point where companies will move their business over sea to manufacture goods this is no recovery.
Look up desalination (SWRO) and Tidal wave Energy to give you an idea of what green really is. U think mainstream and your elected officials want you to know about this kind of technology that can foil there agendas for the NEW WORLD ORDER. This is REAL my friend and you need to start preparing for whats ahead.
Wake up you man-made global warming believer fuck.... the planet does through these cycles on it's own. Man is accountable for less than 3% of CO2 emissions. Explain the periods in the Earths history when it was warmer than it is now and the sea level was higher... before people !!! Who do you blame and want to tax for that you liberal fuck face.
wow, what strong arguments you have....there are scientific explanations for all of this. sea levels used to be higher because there was much more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during that time, which is a generally agreed upon scientific hypothesis. there is no point in saying "who should we tax for previous cases of higher temperatures?" that would be like saying "why don't americans still pay taxes to the british?" why would anyone pay taxes for something which no longer is relevant...sigh
So according to Al Gore the scientific community has worked tirelessly for 20 years to prove this....it has now been proven that 14 of those 20 years the climate has actually cooled....not warmed!!
What matters is the underlying rate of warming, the average temperature over 2001-2007 was 14.44 degrees celsius, 0.21 degrees celsius warmer than corresponding values for 1991-2000.
if typing hyperbolic shit because you feel emotional about an issue (ala climategate) discredits you and the entire community, what you just said makes you the world's biggest hack and the entire fanatical fringe behind you has no leg to stand on.
You fucking idiot. Don't you see that the environmental movement has been high jacked by the very corporate interests that the environmentalists have been fighting against. GE (owns MSNBC, NBC and CNBC), BP, Exxon, Shell, Goldmen Sachs, JP Morgon, Enron (before their collapse) and countless others are drooling over the money to be made from packaging up these carbon credits into derivatives.
The idea that the GW skeptics are paid by big oil is absolutely ludicrous.
if that's the case why would exxonmobile work to create confusion about climate change - (ucsusa org / assets / documents / global_warming / exxon_report pdf)
I think the agenda of climate change denial is pretty clear - to satisfy the interests of big oil and the other corporations that stand to lose money by obeying environ-friendly standards.
oh so gore wants to go after palin in a debate but he is deathly afraid to debate lord monckton. LOL
RepublicanNatio 2 years ago
Olberman is a great example of everything that is wrong with the world.
KingDingaLing090 2 years ago 2
Global warming is a complete lie. The only solution is to tax everything that has to do with co2 even your own breath... common America were much smarter than this shim-sham. This is about power, money and control which only a selected few benefit and get filthy stupid rich.
rrought317 2 years ago
@rrought317 look, I'm a chemical engineer, and i'm afraid you are ignoring scientific data. the problem is not "co2", it is greenhouse gases, gases that have higher radiative properties. Yes, co2 is a natural component of the atmosphere, but it is natural as long as its concentration does not exceed around a 12% in volume. When its concentration exceeds this amount it starts altering the radiative properties of air, and it contributes to trapping solar radiation. Its fact, not fiction.
sirdelrio 1 year ago
@sirdelrio look, I'm a electronics engineer by degree and I've taken geology courses for the API. Bottom line, I don't care what the false consensus claims from the IPCC are, what is clear is Maurice Strong was the founder of this whole global warming hoax and this man is a fraud. Climate change is natural and to say that humans are the cause of this, then maybe you're the one that's misinformed. The human race is a beautiful thing, don't be dehumanized by the eugenics freaks from the UN.
rrought317 1 year ago
@rrought317 what I meant is that being a chemical engineer, environmental science is one of my fields of expertise. I'm not misinformed, I teach college level environmental science courses. Yes, climate change is natural, BUT excesive combustion gases (co2, cfc, NOx, SO2) affect the radiative properties in the atmosphere, and it leads to a greater warming effect, the greenhouse effect.
sirdelrio 1 year ago
@rrought317 also keep one thing in mind: in science, things are not proven by the reputation of men or institutions, but by measured data.
sirdelrio 1 year ago
@sirdelrio I'm not trying to discredit you in any way, your skills and trades are important to society and humanity. Who and where are your sources on this claim? Do you think a global tax paid to the IMF bank owned by the Rothschilds's will actually prevent or help climate change?
rrought317 1 year ago
@rrought317 you're right on this. it is true that capitalistic structures are benefiting from certain policies in disguise of environmental concern.
sirdelrio 1 year ago
@rrought317 It is incredible that the US, the only country in the world that won't accept global warming, also the greatest producer of greenhouse gases, is the only one to promote in his ultra-conservative media, the "fraud" of global warming. You americans should compare the degree of impartiality of your journalism with those of other continents to realize that in your country media are not to inform but to serve political interests.
sirdelrio 1 year ago
Lost all credability Keith you are a one sided fool. Improve our trade debt GREEN ENERGY!LOL! What does green energy put out to improve GDP? Were're going to have to import all metals, semiconductors, and labor from China, Can't maufacture all that raw material here in the US because of carbon credits. Keith is a complete fool and it just goes to show Americans that you can't believe nothing the mainstream reports.
rrought317 2 years ago
why is it that we're the only industrialized nation not make a strong move towards alternative energy? china for example is moving very aggressively. are all the nations fools but us?
Pteropax 2 years ago 3
Companies are taxed outrageously to the point where companies will move their business over sea to manufacture goods this is no recovery.
Look up desalination (SWRO) and Tidal wave Energy to give you an idea of what green really is. U think mainstream and your elected officials want you to know about this kind of technology that can foil there agendas for the NEW WORLD ORDER. This is REAL my friend and you need to start preparing for whats ahead.
rrought317 2 years ago
A climate change sceptic is not necessarily a "climate denier" .
Ianacek 2 years ago
Darrrr I'm cereal!
FreelancePatriot76 2 years ago
no wonder msnbcs ratings are in the dumps
skunkworks226 2 years ago 2
Wake up you man-made global warming believer fuck.... the planet does through these cycles on it's own. Man is accountable for less than 3% of CO2 emissions. Explain the periods in the Earths history when it was warmer than it is now and the sea level was higher... before people !!! Who do you blame and want to tax for that you liberal fuck face.
goodequine 2 years ago 2
wow, what strong arguments you have....there are scientific explanations for all of this. sea levels used to be higher because there was much more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during that time, which is a generally agreed upon scientific hypothesis. there is no point in saying "who should we tax for previous cases of higher temperatures?" that would be like saying "why don't americans still pay taxes to the british?" why would anyone pay taxes for something which no longer is relevant...sigh
euroeric24 2 years ago
i'd be interested in seeing your source of this data: 3% CO2 emissions are man made.
mycanadafirst 2 years ago
So according to Al Gore the scientific community has worked tirelessly for 20 years to prove this....it has now been proven that 14 of those 20 years the climate has actually cooled....not warmed!!
kennydob07 2 years ago
What matters is the underlying rate of warming, the average temperature over 2001-2007 was 14.44 degrees celsius, 0.21 degrees celsius warmer than corresponding values for 1991-2000.
Pteropax 2 years ago
i would shoot this reporter right in the face. what a shill .. find a tree and a rope and string up al gore
mrdavecdn 2 years ago
if typing hyperbolic shit because you feel emotional about an issue (ala climategate) discredits you and the entire community, what you just said makes you the world's biggest hack and the entire fanatical fringe behind you has no leg to stand on.
Pteropax 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1: higher temperatures cause CO2 increase, not the opposite.
2: temps have fallen the past 10 years while CO2 continues to rise.
3: periods of much warmer/cooler weather (and higher/lower CO2) have existed over 20,000+ years.
4: planets warm/cool together, which means warming/cooling is primarily caused by the sun.
We need 100% separation of science and state.
Government funded science == propaganda.
Plants absorb CO2 and emit O2.
Hang climate totalitarians.
End lies & pollution.
honestann 2 years ago
You fucking idiot. Don't you see that the environmental movement has been high jacked by the very corporate interests that the environmentalists have been fighting against. GE (owns MSNBC, NBC and CNBC), BP, Exxon, Shell, Goldmen Sachs, JP Morgon, Enron (before their collapse) and countless others are drooling over the money to be made from packaging up these carbon credits into derivatives.
The idea that the GW skeptics are paid by big oil is absolutely ludicrous.
malinafagan 2 years ago
if that's the case why would exxonmobile work to create confusion about climate change - (ucsusa org / assets / documents / global_warming / exxon_report pdf)
Pteropax 2 years ago
I think the agenda of climate change denial is pretty clear - to satisfy the interests of big oil and the other corporations that stand to lose money by obeying environ-friendly standards.
Asher8328 2 years ago