When using Logos (classic and the only way to argue reasonable) as your base of argument and you stand up against an oponent, what you do is in fact seach for common ground. The reason why you're doing this is because the only way you would be able to get oponent to admit to your conclusion is by using premises he accept. In society as a whole you hear valid reasoning less than 0.001% of the time. Specially among politicans
I'm afraid this guy knows very little about the theory of argumentation.
Compare the views of Roger Fisher: "Getting to Yes;" and especially the "workbook," but even more, "Beyond Machiavelli," which he argues, is more effective than power politics. Find more of this latter point in his: "Coping with International Conflict and his earlier pair "International Conflict for Beginners" and "Dear Israelis, Dear Arabs." One more: "Getting Together: Building Relationships as We Negotiate." (I blog on these; google: "Listen, Learn, Leverage, Lead" etc.)
I was an unhappy attorney when I came across Rogers in the late 1960's. Changed my life and my career. i went back to school and became a therapist--some Rogers, some Perls, and many others influenced me. Retired a few years ago. Even though my work went through may transformations Rogers and Perls remained strong influences. IIn the last 10 years of my professional life Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg and their Solution Focused Therapy were most influential. Seee them on you-tube
When using Logos (classic and the only way to argue reasonable) as your base of argument and you stand up against an oponent, what you do is in fact seach for common ground. The reason why you're doing this is because the only way you would be able to get oponent to admit to your conclusion is by using premises he accept. In society as a whole you hear valid reasoning less than 0.001% of the time. Specially among politicans
I'm afraid this guy knows very little about the theory of argumentation.
Idol2011no 1 month ago
perfect!
thankyou so much
TheProducer848 1 month ago
So who else has to do a D2L assignment on this?
mr717100 2 months ago 2
This helped my paper so much! thank you
RofICopters 3 months ago
Excellent. I use this in my class.
mcmcgehe 11 months ago
This was VERY helpful. Great work.
tedmichaels 1 year ago
Compare the views of Roger Fisher: "Getting to Yes;" and especially the "workbook," but even more, "Beyond Machiavelli," which he argues, is more effective than power politics. Find more of this latter point in his: "Coping with International Conflict and his earlier pair "International Conflict for Beginners" and "Dear Israelis, Dear Arabs." One more: "Getting Together: Building Relationships as We Negotiate." (I blog on these; google: "Listen, Learn, Leverage, Lead" etc.)
FireweedFarm 1 year ago
Thank you so much for this video. Very informative.
daisyink82 2 years ago
I would not say that the ad hominem is a typical feature of the classical argument.
Liked your presentation. Thanks.
MeLovesMoosic 2 years ago
excellent, I am studying Rogers at present never realised Obama was a fan as well! Thank you for making this available.
pgilladdy 2 years ago
I was an unhappy attorney when I came across Rogers in the late 1960's. Changed my life and my career. i went back to school and became a therapist--some Rogers, some Perls, and many others influenced me. Retired a few years ago. Even though my work went through may transformations Rogers and Perls remained strong influences. IIn the last 10 years of my professional life Steve de Shazer and Insoo Kim Berg and their Solution Focused Therapy were most influential. Seee them on you-tube
pbziegler 2 years ago
nice....
muxi2222 2 years ago
Fabulous work. I will be using this in my class. Thanks.
jsterrantino 2 years ago 4
I really appreciate your video and the demonstration of Rogerian.
serenityswan 3 years ago 7