At 400m the ak still has a 450 ft lbs of energy, which is the equivalent of being shot point blank with a .40 caliber handgun. The velocity at which the bullet is traveling is about 1300 fps. If your ak has a long barrel that is in good condition, there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to hit something at that range.
well as vile and hickish as jesper's comment was, i have to agree with him, the ak47 is poorly made and looses almost all accuracy at about 200m. M16 models would definitely be better, even an A1 model even though it would jam about half way through.
ive used several ak47s and they all suck. the only good ones are made by people who intend for their rifles to be accurate. and as for my comment on the m16, if you sharpened your reading skills a little, you would notice i said A1 model. so dont come whining to me
Your colt is just a handgun, the AK-47 can tear through cement blocks, it can shoot straight through wood, and it's much more accurate than the magnum due to its lower recoil. It also has more range and an automatic firing mode.
I'd like to see you go head to head with a guy with an AK-47 when you're armed with your colt. You'll see that it's no kiddy toy
IMHO, I would pick a 5.56 gun over a 7.62, as 5.56 travels faster and it fragments before it reaches its target making effectiveness better. Don't get me wrong, the 7.62 is badass, but its a little to heavy and innacurate.
If he didn't hit the first time he's got 29 more to make life unbearably difficult for someone at 400 yards, if not lethal. Many AR's won't do that either. Its a battle rifle, not a sniper's weapon. At 400 yards, most platoon level units will call in organic weapons, not small arms. moradeur64: excellent posts on your part, very true.
I think, there is no need, for an assaultrifle, to be that much accurate. reliablility is much more important. Whith the AK 47 one has no problem to hit targets at 200 m and you won't see a malfunction. Thats good. But there are better rifles on the market, that combine precision and reliablility. Like the G36, Galil or HK-416. A recent sandchamber test makes it obvious. While the M4 reached more than 800 jams, the SCAR and HK-416 had both slightly over 200. And the XM8 only had 127 jams.
I also regard aluminum not as an optimal material, to use for an assault rifle.
I have no problems whith AR-15 type rifles, I like them very much. They're great sporting or fun rifles, but if I had the choice, I would never go to war whith one of these.
and another thing..... they never show what they are shooting at. i know that shooting the ground will puff up some smoke just like that. my guess is thats just it.
expecially with irons. try shooting something at 200 yards with irons. it aint so easy. you cant even see what you are shooting at let alone a milk jug.
who cares right? those who prize the m16 for long range accuracy forget the fact that we dont fight in trenches miles apart. 90% of all modern combat takes place within 150 meters or less. that by deffinition makes the m16 obsolete and inferior as a combat rifle when compared to the powerful and reliable ak.
I have a bushmaster M4 16 inch carbine and a WASR-10. There is no comparison when it comes to accuracy, most ARs will trump AKs any day, but you also need to take care of the ARs, they require a LOT more care than any AK.
nope at the most the 7.62x39mm can only hit out to 250 yards reliably anything over that and you'll miss every time. but given my choice i'd take the Mosin-Nagant and a 203 gr 7.62x54R. with it a 500 yard shot is indeed possible
Wrong. Real Russian made Ak's are combat effective up to 300 yds with 7.62x39mm and Russian Ak's chambered in .223 are effective to 450yds. Very rare .308 Russian AK's are accurate and effective out to 700 yds.
Then there is the SKS I blew a milk jug in half at a little over 200 meters with the Yugo M59/66 SKS. Either rifle is a good weapon and they are easy to maintain
There's nothing wrong with the ammunition's accuracy. I've shot sub moa groups at 300 meters with that caliber and I know it can do a lot better. The problem is poorly manufactured and poorly maintained RIFLES, which there are plenty of both on the market and in third world countries.
Max effective range for any GOOD rifle should be 600yds or more. A marine can hit something no prob. at that distance, I say this because I have ran a range fr some time and Max-Effective range for most rifles are close or beyond that.You dont need a .30-06
M16 is good for 600yds. but dont expect that range everywhere, in the woods, urban and jungle areas the AK-47 has the power and manuverability especially with folding stocks.
If you'll remember a few years back, when Russia entered Afghanistan and Regan handed them the weapons that they're using against us now, a lot of the Afghani citizens and militia were armed with old SMLE Enfields, and were putting effective fire down on Russian troops at 800m. The Russians could never get within 300 yards to return fire.
It's ironic to think that they used to be such good marksmen with 'inferior' rifles, and now that they have AK-47s their marksmanship consists of shooting at a spray paint target on a wall fifteen meters away.
It's ironic to think that they used to be such good marksmen with 'inferior' rifles, and now that they have AK-47s their marksmanship consists of shooting at a spray paint target on a wall fifteen meters away.
May not "need" it,but,more propellant and a heavier weight projectile gives the -'06 more range and a greater downrange impact compared to the M43 Russian short.A flatter trajectory is also a benefit.I'd take ANY rifle if I had to. Just ammo,good sights,and good cover!!
Im also sick of people only being able to come up with the same ol, "the M16 is sooo mcuh more accurate" argument. Get something new, how bout, the AK is more reliable, More effecctive round, Cheaper,and so on...common someone be original
Milled receivers and good ammo make an AK's accuracy jump up to an acceptable level. I will never hear anyone say that an AK is worse than an AR without thinking they are truly retarded. What good is range if your rifle doesn't work, huh??
I'd like to know where you got that information from, really. I have a one of each, and I can say with certainty that my AR-15, with either of it's easily interchangeable upper receivers, is more accurate, reliable, and effective than an AK-47 in any of the x39mm cartridges.
I have an HBAR upper that can shoot with some of the best bolt actions. If I want to use heavier ammunition, I can change the upper to a 6.8, .300WSM, .50BEO, or even your 7.62x39 or 5.45x39. I've never had a single jam, and a few weeks ago I shot over 500 rounds of ammunition in the snow and mud. My rifle got dirty, but it never jammed.
When I was overseas I watched countless milta run around shooting thier weapons from the hip, not bringing the sights to thier eyes as we were doing. A lot of the fighting we did was at about 100-350 yards, easy kill range for just about any rifle, even an AK. It can be an effective weapon, lets come up with something new besides the "M16 is so accurate" argument, what else does it have over the AK?
Give me an AK and a I can teach a soldier to clean, shoot proficiently, and maintain it in a few hours. To do that with an M16 would take a few days, as I noted before. Mos soldiers using AK47s are milita and not trained soldiers like US types, Most shoot from the hip.
Buddy is prooving in front of our eyes that the myth of AK inacurracy is age old US propaganda to preserve sales within their borders, and thus be able to exert more control, regardless that their own soldiers and "sons" would benefit by scraping m16 and its derivatives! Another proof that life aint worth shit in US, but only the CDN$!
wow...i don't see why people hate the AK so much. It's perfect for a simple, easy to use, and user friendly rifle. It may not be as better as the AR or m16 in terms of acc. However it's easy enough child can use it and clean it.
Oh you lucky Shit out there in nowhere if I had that capability --I would be lighting of tactical NUKES no Nosey neighbors ..Damn can't wait till Armegeddon...
my ak rapes all rifles!! my freind fixed my so it would be on zero always!! and put a quarter in a tree trunk and shot it from 400yards away, and did it 2 more times, so i dont get all this crap they say is wrong with an ak!!
M16 accuracy comes from tight tolorances and great american manufacturing. The Ak was never designed to drive tacks, they knew that nobody(except jacka**es) stand up or expose thier heads to aim during a real fire-fight(I know I've been there)It works every time, and it works under any condition and be at least a little accurate.Also remember, most people using AKs are untrained millita, unlike trained US troops.Even an Ak could be deadly with the right training.
Listen you evil rooted, imbred, so misinformed that thinking US is the freest/best nation morone or marine: in typical, fly over US, fashion you make the hardest effort, whichis rather weak, to shit upon what you know not and are scared of! That is the US style! The fact of the matter is that that stupid psychology only workd on the likes of you yanks wh have been trained from early days to be told what to like, how to behave, and what to believe in!
m16,got shit on ak47,m16 jams easy,imagine u in front of your enemy,,that`s 1 of the reason lots of fucking americans die in vietnam,but they deserve it,
ITS SEMPER FRIES...ak's is a more deadly weapon in the hands of a trained professional than an M16 is, end of discusion! I will stick to the Serbian, Zastava M-76 semi-auto 7.92X57mm Mauser! It is a SVD derivative, inhanced for the more powerful round, increased usability and comfort with less then 1.5 MOA at 800 meters
I see everyone arguing about the AK47 and the Ar-15/M16 here.... Modern day AK's, like the yugos and bulgarian makes, have reinforced and forged receivers, thus giving them the same level of accuracy as modern day AR-15/M-16 carbines... come on folks..
and i bet it comes as a shock that the while the AK47 is an assault rifle, the AR-15 (non-carbines) is actually in a completely different class, called "marksman rifle". These two classes are differ tremendously....
stop arguing. the m16 and the ak-47 are both good weapons. the ak-47 is low mantinece and powerful. the m16 is more long range and acurrate but both do their jobs
i dont know why people try to compair the ak 47 with the m16 it have been tested over and over again they are simplified as the same. the down point of the ak is the good point of the m16 the down point of the m16 is the good part of the ak.
The AK's a decent weapon..but people need to realize there ARE better guns out there. Like the Styer, the G36, or the XM8. And overall, id take an M16A4 over the AK-47.
just because those guns are more accurate doesn't mean that they are better. You also have to think about reliability and power, and the ak47 scores top for that.
i love youtube everyone is an expert and every page is full of fighting comments ricers vs domestic M16 vs AK and i have put my fair share of fighting in but fuck every page needs this shit?
Comparing the M16 and AK47 is like comparing apples and oranges. There competly differnt weapons with differnt porpouses and tactics. also they are extremly unaccurate they can barely hit a thing 200 yards away with 5 round. and by the way u spelled Kalashnikov wrong
Oh, and in case you didn't realize I own both weapons and shoot them alot. So if you think I have no knowledge about the weapons I not only worked with and own, you are mistaken "grasshoppa".
wtf is 88steele88s problem i dont understand both guns are made for two diffrent things if you can make me a rifle that is as relliable as the ak nad as accurate as the m16 ill be happy. comparing the m16 and ak47 is like comparing my match gun to an out of the box rifle my match gun is going to be more accurate
You did not read what I said! "You can NOT compare the AK 47 to an M16 or an M14"!! If you want to know why you cant watch the video "AK 47 vs M16"! And I don't appreciate you labeling me a hippy after I spent 6 years using these weapons for our government.
The AK-47 was designed to be able to hit people at 300 meters he is pushing it on purpose to show that it can be done farther. so stop acting like the AK-47 is overrated because it is an excellent gun and very reliable. and 88steele88 no one can believe that you know what your talking about until you prove that you can use actual grammar and speak English.
Do you realize how dumb you just made yourself sound by comparing the AK to ANY other rifle?!! You don't know what your talking about and I really shouldn't have waisted this time to tell you that.
The AK 47 was not meant to hit milk jugs at 400m and hit with one shot!! I belive you are talking about results that come from a sniper rifle, not an assault style rifle. So go easy on the guy, would ya?
Why do people discriminate against hunting rifles verses military assault rifles. My best friend is one of those goes that does. He sees my AK-47 as being bad because of it's history. He sees a 7-MAG or 30 06 as a good mans gun. He admits to it being a good gun but he doesnt want anything to do with one. I have been shooting a deer with it just to show can drop a deer with one.
Yep thats the one i got it is a great gun but even with that huge muzzle break im still getting pushed around so i got an AR-15 as my main weapon but if i cant have that one then the AMD-65 is my ticket:)
Yeah i'd love an AR15 too but i'm more of a russian weapons fan. When i finally get my license the first thing i'll do is to buy an SVD Dragunov and a semi-auto AK version, i fancy the longer barreled ones but i have a deactivated AMD-65 becouse i'm a patriot and it is a very attractive weapon. I have another AMD-65 that's been converted to be a non-lethal weapon and it's still full-auto. Unfortunately you can't own a full-automatic firearm in hungary. Or most of europe as a matter of fact.
i knew a guy who fought with an AK47 in former Yugoslavia, he was positive about the thing,had no trouble hitting an enemy, even if you hit only in the foot or in the shoulder, you win. firefights always occur at less than 300 yards. It's most important that your gun works,accuracy comes next.Adrenaline dumps in real fights make your eyes unfit to use the sights properly. People forget war is different than the shooting range.
the ak-47 has a good accuracy up to 50 meters. further away, the shots become less and less precise and start varying. I've done the test at my shooting stand with a stabilzer. The gun itself doesn't vary position, but the bullets do
You're right on the money, but the thing with an ak is you can drag it through the mud and still fire it...cant do that with an ar! I know, I have both!
Having fired an AK47 and an AR-15, I can say the sights and stock design on the ak47 are TERRIBLE. Its almost impossible to get a sight picture, you have to practically turn your head sideways to get the sights aligned.
I didnt see the milk jug for one, second, how are we suppose to see if you even hit it? I am the biggest ak47 fan IMO, but how was this suppose to how its accuracy when we cant even see the target?
The only way you would have to worry as if you didn't take care of your weapon and you had long periods in the field.
I do agree they both are great weapons, but if the AK was any better the US would have switched to them years ago because of the cheaper prices you can find on them.
The m16 is better. It may not look it in target practice, but for actual killing it is because the back of the 5.56 mm 223 cal bullet is more heavy then the front and when it hits the target it goes into a spin because of this. The force on the spin becomes to great and causes the bullet to break into fragments in the body of the target. This almost assures death. Also if you take care of an m16 you will not have a problem with any jams.
You're right on the 556. I've heard official studies showed that the wound caused by the 7.62Soviet is no better than a handgun wound. It's problem is it brings enough(slightly more than 5.56) energy to the body, but it penetrates too much and doesn't fragment, so too little of it is deposited on the target.
And the M16 is still a bitch to take care of in the field. Like a kid, you can't be wiping it's ass 24hrs a day, though as long as you immediate/remdial action it's ass, you're good to go. S/F
huh? i read somewhere that the bullet, especially the ss109 or the steel tipped ones the US uses, goes straight through people, often leaving a relatively exit wound, thus taking several rounds to down an opponent.
solviet union had the largest inventory of ak47's and when it broke up generals sold them to people in other countries for dirt cheap prices under the table there are still allot of ak's out there.
BTW the AK can be an accurate weapon. The right ammo, the right shooter, the trigger really helps if you have a nice one, and the rifle. I find that AK's vary in accuracy from rifle to rifle.
Yes, they are fairly accurate guns. I have shot a WASR plenty of times and can do 4 inches with the crappy Russian ammunition. With some good USA stuff and better sights I don't doubt under 2" at all at 100 and have seen it in the past.
He is somewhat right, the weapons that are used today for the most part are AKM's. The first AK47's used milled receivers and I am not sure of the exact date but I believe in the mid-late 60's the major countries that were producing the AK47's started making them from 1.0mm stamped sheet metal receivers and then it was called the AKM. So most of the guns you see are AKM's but everyone calls them AK47's which is fine. Some AK47's are still out there, but are old and not very co mmon.
Well said Wolverine. Its about time somebody calls it what it really is and AKM. I annoys me when people call it an AK-47 and its just the bottom of the barrel WASR.
Fuking poofs Ak 47 is still used ALL OVER the world and that guy cant shoot shit..and omg who the fuk is the one that doesnt know who Kalashnikov is!? WHY THE FUK WHERE YOU EVEN WATCHING THIS VIDEO THEN!?
Dont rest the rifle on the car it makes the rifle pop up and ruin the shot plus keep the butt of the rifle in the shoulder as you can adjust the sights better
Probably a Romanian AKM. 4-6 inch groups are normal. I hit a pop can at 100 yards standing once. 300m is usually described as the AKs effective range but you may be able to hit something at 400, but I've never tried.
ak47 are still in fucking use its the best assualt rifle out there its almost impossible to break and easy to clean theyre not used by most countries but i think russia still uses it other then that mostly terriost countrys
yea everyone else BUT YOU is correct. you have no idea wat your talking about. you know they are the best from watching lord of war a million times. you can probly tell me everything about an uzi then too right? that was on the movie as well. dude, we are fighting people who use ak-47s right now. somalia still uses ak-47s. china uses them. everybody fucking uses them. lol even though i feel bad for bashing you about one little tiny mistake im still going to do it. dont take it personal though.
China doesn't use the Ak-47 anymore. They use a combination of a new weapon called the QBZ-95 and a weapon that resembles an Ak-47 (but has different internal mechanisms).
yeah cus they figured a way to make the ak-47 into a shotgun and they just went with the new design, its black and all metal. i think it looks stupid cus the ak-47 is popular because its so sexy lookin lol. it is a cool looking gun.
The shotgun that looks like an Ak-47 is actually a Russian design called the Saiga 12. The Chinese Ak-47 advancement is called the Type 81 and is a longer more accurate version. Their current weapon though is the QBZ-95 which is an entirely new design.
really? i thought that they just took it and made it into both an automatic rifle and a shotgun. well dang lol. i still think the original ak-47 is the best weapon ever
wow Ak propaganda again. GONNA GET BACK MY FAL
Kapov 1 year ago
did he get it?
idunnosia 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Need to pleasure a Woman
FASTLOVERFUN . COM
BrookePerkins16 2 years ago
it realy depends what model you use
beethovenmetalhead 3 years ago
6 inches from your face pile 6 inches
hawkdogie 3 years ago
At 400m the ak still has a 450 ft lbs of energy, which is the equivalent of being shot point blank with a .40 caliber handgun. The velocity at which the bullet is traveling is about 1300 fps. If your ak has a long barrel that is in good condition, there is no reason why you shouldn't be able to hit something at that range.
medusestare 3 years ago
Craving for sweettasting and warm creampie???
DATEHERWOW...DOT...COM
sexiMolly60 3 years ago
with ice cream?
ghostmonkeyrape 2 years ago
i can hit milk jugs one shot with my crappy AK one shot at 200 meters, each time. but the round drops alot at 400, so it takes a bit of work.
Erron2007 3 years ago 5
I love AKs but I've got a question. Did you hit anything?
Goodspittin 3 years ago
I guess the white puffs were you hitting the jugs.
Goodspittin 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all hot guys reading this hit me up on MSN Messenger ID jane22fall. im bored xD p
cmowerman 3 years ago
shit:P
v3rsac3x 3 years ago
well as vile and hickish as jesper's comment was, i have to agree with him, the ak47 is poorly made and looses almost all accuracy at about 200m. M16 models would definitely be better, even an A1 model even though it would jam about half way through.
cholopavo 3 years ago
You guys are all talking out of your asses. AK's are more accurate than you think, and M16's don't jam nearly as much as you think!
hybridatsun350 3 years ago 2
ive used several ak47s and they all suck. the only good ones are made by people who intend for their rifles to be accurate. and as for my comment on the m16, if you sharpened your reading skills a little, you would notice i said A1 model. so dont come whining to me
cholopavo 3 years ago
Its all about the shooter behind the rifle bro. But I would deff agree that it would be a very very hard shot with the Iron Sights of the AK
StevethePirate96 3 years ago 2
Hell 400 Meters is a hard shot for any rifle with iron sights without a lot of practice.
ytykg 3 years ago
my ak can hit that distance no problem your just hating.
fatbuu3800 3 years ago
2nd shot you can hear shrapnel flying everywhere.
DeLeetEd 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My Colt ANACONDA, 44 MAGNUM! That`s real Power, Man.Not this kiddy Toy!
tritium75 3 years ago
why does some fag in ever video have to posta gay comment like yours,fuck your magnum.
xxxAxel666xxx 3 years ago 2
Your colt is just a handgun, the AK-47 can tear through cement blocks, it can shoot straight through wood, and it's much more accurate than the magnum due to its lower recoil. It also has more range and an automatic firing mode.
I'd like to see you go head to head with a guy with an AK-47 when you're armed with your colt. You'll see that it's no kiddy toy
anonymouspunk2 3 years ago 2
well said and way to keep your comment clean
videofn 3 years ago
your mag wont hit a target @ 400 meters
eye4me 3 years ago
" Kolishnikov " ??
sam117711 3 years ago
Kalashnikov!
vladimir1944 3 years ago 2
WATCH CFR/NAU
densefawg 4 years ago
IMHO, I would pick a 5.56 gun over a 7.62, as 5.56 travels faster and it fragments before it reaches its target making effectiveness better. Don't get me wrong, the 7.62 is badass, but its a little to heavy and innacurate.
Fearosius 4 years ago
My Ak is chambered for the 5.56mm. It's very accurate.
However, the 5.56mm doesn't frag before it hits, it frags after impact to cause more tissue damage.
srouxd162 4 years ago
go watch a video on the M60 and then tell me yuo would pick a 5.56 over an 7.62
VolkerMorrison 4 years ago
If he didn't hit the first time he's got 29 more to make life unbearably difficult for someone at 400 yards, if not lethal. Many AR's won't do that either. Its a battle rifle, not a sniper's weapon. At 400 yards, most platoon level units will call in organic weapons, not small arms. moradeur64: excellent posts on your part, very true.
ronellis61 4 years ago 3
I think, there is no need, for an assaultrifle, to be that much accurate. reliablility is much more important. Whith the AK 47 one has no problem to hit targets at 200 m and you won't see a malfunction. Thats good. But there are better rifles on the market, that combine precision and reliablility. Like the G36, Galil or HK-416. A recent sandchamber test makes it obvious. While the M4 reached more than 800 jams, the SCAR and HK-416 had both slightly over 200. And the XM8 only had 127 jams.
marodeur64 4 years ago
I also regard aluminum not as an optimal material, to use for an assault rifle.
I have no problems whith AR-15 type rifles, I like them very much. They're great sporting or fun rifles, but if I had the choice, I would never go to war whith one of these.
marodeur64 4 years ago
and another thing..... they never show what they are shooting at. i know that shooting the ground will puff up some smoke just like that. my guess is thats just it.
demonslayer923 4 years ago
expecially with irons. try shooting something at 200 yards with irons. it aint so easy. you cant even see what you are shooting at let alone a milk jug.
demonslayer923 4 years ago
if that is an ak-47, they shoot the 7.62x39. this round IS NOT a 400 yard round. just plain and simple.
demonslayer923 4 years ago
who cares right? those who prize the m16 for long range accuracy forget the fact that we dont fight in trenches miles apart. 90% of all modern combat takes place within 150 meters or less. that by deffinition makes the m16 obsolete and inferior as a combat rifle when compared to the powerful and reliable ak.
yourredcomrade717 4 years ago 3
just saying in concurrence with you.
yourredcomrade717 4 years ago
I have a bushmaster M4 16 inch carbine and a WASR-10. There is no comparison when it comes to accuracy, most ARs will trump AKs any day, but you also need to take care of the ARs, they require a LOT more care than any AK.
armedwithcarbombs 4 years ago
Did he hit the jug?
osirus2020 4 years ago
nope at the most the 7.62x39mm can only hit out to 250 yards reliably anything over that and you'll miss every time. but given my choice i'd take the Mosin-Nagant and a 203 gr 7.62x54R. with it a 500 yard shot is indeed possible
HiramAbiff06 4 years ago
Wrong. Real Russian made Ak's are combat effective up to 300 yds with 7.62x39mm and Russian Ak's chambered in .223 are effective to 450yds. Very rare .308 Russian AK's are accurate and effective out to 700 yds.
srouxd162 4 years ago
Then there is the SKS I blew a milk jug in half at a little over 200 meters with the Yugo M59/66 SKS. Either rifle is a good weapon and they are easy to maintain
HiramAbiff06 4 years ago
There's nothing wrong with the ammunition's accuracy. I've shot sub moa groups at 300 meters with that caliber and I know it can do a lot better. The problem is poorly manufactured and poorly maintained RIFLES, which there are plenty of both on the market and in third world countries.
SAsgarters 4 years ago
Max effective range for any GOOD rifle should be 600yds or more. A marine can hit something no prob. at that distance, I say this because I have ran a range fr some time and Max-Effective range for most rifles are close or beyond that.You dont need a .30-06
CasterTroy2004 4 years ago
M16 is good for 600yds. but dont expect that range everywhere, in the woods, urban and jungle areas the AK-47 has the power and manuverability especially with folding stocks.
greatwhite78 4 years ago
If you'll remember a few years back, when Russia entered Afghanistan and Regan handed them the weapons that they're using against us now, a lot of the Afghani citizens and militia were armed with old SMLE Enfields, and were putting effective fire down on Russian troops at 800m. The Russians could never get within 300 yards to return fire.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
Afghanistan is wide open mountains. Range = King there, you are right.
tyrvidar 4 years ago
It's ironic to think that they used to be such good marksmen with 'inferior' rifles, and now that they have AK-47s their marksmanship consists of shooting at a spray paint target on a wall fifteen meters away.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
It's ironic to think that they used to be such good marksmen with 'inferior' rifles, and now that they have AK-47s their marksmanship consists of shooting at a spray paint target on a wall fifteen meters away.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
May not "need" it,but,more propellant and a heavier weight projectile gives the -'06 more range and a greater downrange impact compared to the M43 Russian short.A flatter trajectory is also a benefit.I'd take ANY rifle if I had to. Just ammo,good sights,and good cover!!
RIVERINE 4 years ago
I heard a couple of rounds ricochet in this clip. I own both SKS and AK's. For a 400m shot the .30-06 is what I would take.
RIVERINE 4 years ago
The AK-47 is really not all that accurate, but don't get me wrong the AK-47 is bad ass gun
cut227 4 years ago
ak-47 fuckin rules
TowelHead20 4 years ago
fuck yea
linkjay69 4 years ago
he spent so much on the gun he cant afford a good cam xD
sk8erandp8er 4 years ago
Im also sick of people only being able to come up with the same ol, "the M16 is sooo mcuh more accurate" argument. Get something new, how bout, the AK is more reliable, More effecctive round, Cheaper,and so on...common someone be original
CasterTroy2004 4 years ago 4
damn straight
linkjay69 4 years ago
Milled receivers and good ammo make an AK's accuracy jump up to an acceptable level. I will never hear anyone say that an AK is worse than an AR without thinking they are truly retarded. What good is range if your rifle doesn't work, huh??
greatwhite78 4 years ago 2
I'd like to know where you got that information from, really. I have a one of each, and I can say with certainty that my AR-15, with either of it's easily interchangeable upper receivers, is more accurate, reliable, and effective than an AK-47 in any of the x39mm cartridges.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
I have an HBAR upper that can shoot with some of the best bolt actions. If I want to use heavier ammunition, I can change the upper to a 6.8, .300WSM, .50BEO, or even your 7.62x39 or 5.45x39. I've never had a single jam, and a few weeks ago I shot over 500 rounds of ammunition in the snow and mud. My rifle got dirty, but it never jammed.
AreThereNoMoreNames 4 years ago
When I was overseas I watched countless milta run around shooting thier weapons from the hip, not bringing the sights to thier eyes as we were doing. A lot of the fighting we did was at about 100-350 yards, easy kill range for just about any rifle, even an AK. It can be an effective weapon, lets come up with something new besides the "M16 is so accurate" argument, what else does it have over the AK?
CasterTroy2004 4 years ago
Give me an AK and a I can teach a soldier to clean, shoot proficiently, and maintain it in a few hours. To do that with an M16 would take a few days, as I noted before. Mos soldiers using AK47s are milita and not trained soldiers like US types, Most shoot from the hip.
CasterTroy2004 4 years ago 3
Buddy is prooving in front of our eyes that the myth of AK inacurracy is age old US propaganda to preserve sales within their borders, and thus be able to exert more control, regardless that their own soldiers and "sons" would benefit by scraping m16 and its derivatives! Another proof that life aint worth shit in US, but only the CDN$!
Kamenolom 4 years ago
wow...i don't see why people hate the AK so much. It's perfect for a simple, easy to use, and user friendly rifle. It may not be as better as the AR or m16 in terms of acc. However it's easy enough child can use it and clean it.
lordNitrox 4 years ago
wow your gonna shot your eye out
BLAKE1444 4 years ago
Take all your fucking guns and fill your ass with them.
karapas31 4 years ago
Oh you lucky Shit out there in nowhere if I had that capability --I would be lighting of tactical NUKES no Nosey neighbors ..Damn can't wait till Armegeddon...
deltaalpha21074 4 years ago
give me an m16 and ill hit it first try
pjn003 4 years ago
why?, because you have seen from the previous videos that its more accurate tough guy!
kryshtal 4 years ago
my ak rapes all rifles!! my freind fixed my so it would be on zero always!! and put a quarter in a tree trunk and shot it from 400yards away, and did it 2 more times, so i dont get all this crap they say is wrong with an ak!!
sarnakaren 4 years ago
I love the AK, but a quarter at 400yd?? I don't believe that, unless you blew a whole drum mag into that tree
FlyerAce128 4 years ago
M16 accuracy comes from tight tolorances and great american manufacturing. The Ak was never designed to drive tacks, they knew that nobody(except jacka**es) stand up or expose thier heads to aim during a real fire-fight(I know I've been there)It works every time, and it works under any condition and be at least a little accurate.Also remember, most people using AKs are untrained millita, unlike trained US troops.Even an Ak could be deadly with the right training.
CasterTroy2004 4 years ago
ar15 gits its accuracy from tight parts... yaw the ak will shoot whin its cuvvured in mud,cus it proabaley just runs out of the commey piece of $hit.
troyshrew 4 years ago
Listen you evil rooted, imbred, so misinformed that thinking US is the freest/best nation morone or marine: in typical, fly over US, fashion you make the hardest effort, whichis rather weak, to shit upon what you know not and are scared of! That is the US style! The fact of the matter is that that stupid psychology only workd on the likes of you yanks wh have been trained from early days to be told what to like, how to behave, and what to believe in!
Kamenolom 4 years ago
bah ive busted a metal barrell at 450 4/5 times w/ mine
brendandk 4 years ago
400m AmAzing .... I am sceptic about this but ....
aviomaster 4 years ago
ak-47 rapes m16 anyone with half a brain knows that!
Panzrcommander 4 years ago 3
400 meters with an AK? I've never seen an AK capable of consistent engagement at that range. I'm reserving judgment, but color me skeptical.
bddc201 4 years ago
m16,got shit on ak47,m16 jams easy,imagine u in front of your enemy,,that`s 1 of the reason lots of fucking americans die in vietnam,but they deserve it,
stribillim 4 years ago
Shut the hell up dumb ass!!!
Dolo55 4 years ago
guns don't kill people rappers do!
camm5 4 years ago 2
oops 7.62
wlw82959 4 years ago
i own both . but ill stick to my m700 bolt action sniper in 7.52 mm one shot one kill.semper fi
wlw82959 4 years ago
ITS SEMPER FRIES...ak's is a more deadly weapon in the hands of a trained professional than an M16 is, end of discusion! I will stick to the Serbian, Zastava M-76 semi-auto 7.92X57mm Mauser! It is a SVD derivative, inhanced for the more powerful round, increased usability and comfort with less then 1.5 MOA at 800 meters
Good night
Kamenolom 4 years ago
listin closley you can hear the, bullet
d4rkdayz 4 years ago
AK the best rifle in the world. Almost every country uses it.
arist818 4 years ago
Its cheap as hell. So thats why countries have it. We changed all our military guns from AK's to somekind of AUGs But my personal choice is ak ;).
TuPaTam 4 years ago
M16 beter than ak-47?NEVER!!!
Srbin9444 4 years ago
I see everyone arguing about the AK47 and the Ar-15/M16 here.... Modern day AK's, like the yugos and bulgarian makes, have reinforced and forged receivers, thus giving them the same level of accuracy as modern day AR-15/M-16 carbines... come on folks..
and i bet it comes as a shock that the while the AK47 is an assault rifle, the AR-15 (non-carbines) is actually in a completely different class, called "marksman rifle". These two classes are differ tremendously....
beavermatic 4 years ago
If you honestly believe they have the same accuracy, you're a damn fool.
Bushy33 4 years ago 3
stop arguing. the m16 and the ak-47 are both good weapons. the ak-47 is low mantinece and powerful. the m16 is more long range and acurrate but both do their jobs
biggiemacman 4 years ago
That little 5.56 round may be flatter shooting but the 7.62 round won't get knocked around by the wind as easily!
TheColdTruth 4 years ago
i dont know why people try to compair the ak 47 with the m16 it have been tested over and over again they are simplified as the same. the down point of the ak is the good point of the m16 the down point of the m16 is the good part of the ak.
reaperflynn3 4 years ago
The g36 and XM8 would not last very long in a prolonged war, being made out of plastic what not.
The ak 47 is the most durable gun out there, even with 2 scoops of raisin bran you can shoot a milk jug from 400m away.
CsalbertCs 4 years ago
"plastics and what not"
Wake up. Seriously. Its alot more than "plastic"
The materials we use for modern assault rifles these days are alot more durable than wood.
socomsniper784 4 years ago
The AK's a decent weapon..but people need to realize there ARE better guns out there. Like the Styer, the G36, or the XM8. And overall, id take an M16A4 over the AK-47.
socomsniper784 4 years ago
just because those guns are more accurate doesn't mean that they are better. You also have to think about reliability and power, and the ak47 scores top for that.
drummerdude7318 4 years ago
fuck this arguement, g36's all the way! shut up you damn nerds.
coldfire2227 4 years ago
i love youtube everyone is an expert and every page is full of fighting comments ricers vs domestic M16 vs AK and i have put my fair share of fighting in but fuck every page needs this shit?
komrade55 4 years ago
Comparing the M16 and AK47 is like comparing apples and oranges. There competly differnt weapons with differnt porpouses and tactics. also they are extremly unaccurate they can barely hit a thing 200 yards away with 5 round. and by the way u spelled Kalashnikov wrong
cowtippingwhore 4 years ago
88steele88 is a fucking retard
TomaCukor 4 years ago
you suck man when i go down to mexico ill show you how to fire, i get crazy down there and i like ripping bodies in to pieces
dubsters 4 years ago
Whatever dude, your the one lookin like an ass!
greatwhite78 4 years ago
Open fire, bitches!!! WHoo!!!
DairHina 4 years ago
Oh, and in case you didn't realize I own both weapons and shoot them alot. So if you think I have no knowledge about the weapons I not only worked with and own, you are mistaken "grasshoppa".
greatwhite78 4 years ago
wtf is 88steele88s problem i dont understand both guns are made for two diffrent things if you can make me a rifle that is as relliable as the ak nad as accurate as the m16 ill be happy. comparing the m16 and ak47 is like comparing my match gun to an out of the box rifle my match gun is going to be more accurate
ILRRLM 4 years ago
You did not read what I said! "You can NOT compare the AK 47 to an M16 or an M14"!! If you want to know why you cant watch the video "AK 47 vs M16"! And I don't appreciate you labeling me a hippy after I spent 6 years using these weapons for our government.
greatwhite78 4 years ago
The AK-47 was designed to be able to hit people at 300 meters he is pushing it on purpose to show that it can be done farther. so stop acting like the AK-47 is overrated because it is an excellent gun and very reliable. and 88steele88 no one can believe that you know what your talking about until you prove that you can use actual grammar and speak English.
coilgunner2 4 years ago
Do you realize how dumb you just made yourself sound by comparing the AK to ANY other rifle?!! You don't know what your talking about and I really shouldn't have waisted this time to tell you that.
greatwhite78 4 years ago
The AK 47 was not meant to hit milk jugs at 400m and hit with one shot!! I belive you are talking about results that come from a sniper rifle, not an assault style rifle. So go easy on the guy, would ya?
greatwhite78 4 years ago
4 sec delay on the camera
oneilc818 4 years ago
Cool video my bro in law has a SKS man that thing is fun to shoot.
hellboy9224 4 years ago
Why do people discriminate against hunting rifles verses military assault rifles. My best friend is one of those goes that does. He sees my AK-47 as being bad because of it's history. He sees a 7-MAG or 30 06 as a good mans gun. He admits to it being a good gun but he doesnt want anything to do with one. I have been shooting a deer with it just to show can drop a deer with one.
funtoy305 4 years ago
I have been thinking about taking it hunting when deers season comes in to show him I can drop a deer with it as easy as his 7 mag.
funtoy305 4 years ago
K0oL im from utah too plus i got an AK AMD & i can get head shots at about 150yrds & body shots at most 250yrds but anything over that i fail(:
Headshot=12in hieght/wide target
Bodyshot=30in hight/wide target
MrHairyNutz 4 years ago
With AK AMD you mean AMD-65? The black one with short barrel, folding stock and extra front pistolgrip? Becouse that's made in hungary, my place!
wolfgoblin 4 years ago
Yep thats the one i got it is a great gun but even with that huge muzzle break im still getting pushed around so i got an AR-15 as my main weapon but if i cant have that one then the AMD-65 is my ticket:)
MrHairyNutz 4 years ago
Yeah i'd love an AR15 too but i'm more of a russian weapons fan. When i finally get my license the first thing i'll do is to buy an SVD Dragunov and a semi-auto AK version, i fancy the longer barreled ones but i have a deactivated AMD-65 becouse i'm a patriot and it is a very attractive weapon. I have another AMD-65 that's been converted to be a non-lethal weapon and it's still full-auto. Unfortunately you can't own a full-automatic firearm in hungary. Or most of europe as a matter of fact.
wolfgoblin 4 years ago
nice russain ak :D
superflea121 4 years ago
AndyJsJ29
Joined: May 20, 2007
Last Login: 10 hours ago
Videos Watched: 347
C H I L D A B U S E R
steveydunn 4 years ago
i knew a guy who fought with an AK47 in former Yugoslavia, he was positive about the thing,had no trouble hitting an enemy, even if you hit only in the foot or in the shoulder, you win. firefights always occur at less than 300 yards. It's most important that your gun works,accuracy comes next.Adrenaline dumps in real fights make your eyes unfit to use the sights properly. People forget war is different than the shooting range.
hans154 4 years ago
the ak-47 has a good accuracy up to 50 meters. further away, the shots become less and less precise and start varying. I've done the test at my shooting stand with a stabilzer. The gun itself doesn't vary position, but the bullets do
upsilone 4 years ago
are they supersonic rounds
bertmarx 4 years ago
the m16 and the m4 are far better guns ak47's are for sprying bullits not for one shot hits
w3044269 4 years ago
You're right on the money, but the thing with an ak is you can drag it through the mud and still fire it...cant do that with an ar! I know, I have both!
mitercut 4 years ago
same here
AmdGod 4 years ago
Having fired an AK47 and an AR-15, I can say the sights and stock design on the ak47 are TERRIBLE. Its almost impossible to get a sight picture, you have to practically turn your head sideways to get the sights aligned.
I'll take an AR-15/M16 any day, thank you.
MosinDisciple 4 years ago
Agreed. Plus.... there is something about the AK... maybe cause only terrorists use it. the AR is more American.
MrSweetNLow 4 years ago
stupid i cant see any milk jugg or something !
budazor 4 years ago
I didnt see the milk jug for one, second, how are we suppose to see if you even hit it? I am the biggest ak47 fan IMO, but how was this suppose to how its accuracy when we cant even see the target?
android17ak47 4 years ago
Both the m16 and ak47 have there merits the 47 is better for cqc but for range the m16 is better. Conclusion AK47 more assault, M16 more rifle
Vdubb 4 years ago
You are right!!!
mikhasya1976 4 years ago
The only way you would have to worry as if you didn't take care of your weapon and you had long periods in the field.
I do agree they both are great weapons, but if the AK was any better the US would have switched to them years ago because of the cheaper prices you can find on them.
Kiter02 4 years ago
The m16 is better. It may not look it in target practice, but for actual killing it is because the back of the 5.56 mm 223 cal bullet is more heavy then the front and when it hits the target it goes into a spin because of this. The force on the spin becomes to great and causes the bullet to break into fragments in the body of the target. This almost assures death. Also if you take care of an m16 you will not have a problem with any jams.
Kiter02 4 years ago
You're right on the 556. I've heard official studies showed that the wound caused by the 7.62Soviet is no better than a handgun wound. It's problem is it brings enough(slightly more than 5.56) energy to the body, but it penetrates too much and doesn't fragment, so too little of it is deposited on the target.
sureshot649 4 years ago
And the M16 is still a bitch to take care of in the field. Like a kid, you can't be wiping it's ass 24hrs a day, though as long as you immediate/remdial action it's ass, you're good to go. S/F
sureshot649 4 years ago
huh? i read somewhere that the bullet, especially the ss109 or the steel tipped ones the US uses, goes straight through people, often leaving a relatively exit wound, thus taking several rounds to down an opponent.
biohax 4 years ago
Watch AK47 vs. M16 if you want some very good slow mo video.
Wolfskrieger1488 4 years ago
AK-47 is best... m 16 not bad.... KALASNJIKOV JE BOLJI
reperMC 4 years ago
solviet union had the largest inventory of ak47's and when it broke up generals sold them to people in other countries for dirt cheap prices under the table there are still allot of ak's out there.
killakali84 4 years ago
BTW the AK can be an accurate weapon. The right ammo, the right shooter, the trigger really helps if you have a nice one, and the rifle. I find that AK's vary in accuracy from rifle to rifle.
YugoM70ab2 4 years ago
Yes, they are fairly accurate guns. I have shot a WASR plenty of times and can do 4 inches with the crappy Russian ammunition. With some good USA stuff and better sights I don't doubt under 2" at all at 100 and have seen it in the past.
WolverineM70 4 years ago
He is somewhat right, the weapons that are used today for the most part are AKM's. The first AK47's used milled receivers and I am not sure of the exact date but I believe in the mid-late 60's the major countries that were producing the AK47's started making them from 1.0mm stamped sheet metal receivers and then it was called the AKM. So most of the guns you see are AKM's but everyone calls them AK47's which is fine. Some AK47's are still out there, but are old and not very co mmon.
WolverineM70 4 years ago
Well said Wolverine. Its about time somebody calls it what it really is and AKM. I annoys me when people call it an AK-47 and its just the bottom of the barrel WASR.
YugoM70ab2 4 years ago
well the AK is an AK wether its a wasr or yugo. it doesnt matter they still rule there just more affordable
scorpian2 4 years ago
Fuking poofs Ak 47 is still used ALL OVER the world and that guy cant shoot shit..and omg who the fuk is the one that doesnt know who Kalashnikov is!? WHY THE FUK WHERE YOU EVEN WATCHING THIS VIDEO THEN!?
BoYgAm3R 5 years ago
You must be an idiot saying not many countries use Kalashnikovs 47
GambiBoi 5 years ago
Hitting a jug at 400 meters with an AK47 is like playing pick-3 lottery.
v31415926 5 years ago
Dont rest the rifle on the car it makes the rifle pop up and ruin the shot plus keep the butt of the rifle in the shoulder as you can adjust the sights better
V6E 5 years ago
Erm why rest the magazine of the rifle on the car coz the rifle will bounce up and make the shot a lot harder
V6E 5 years ago
Gotta love all those internet gun 'experts' talking through their asses. Cool vid.
tafino 5 years ago
Too much jibberjabber for a 47 second video. Well, at least he didn't talk about green beans and corn that was on the lunch menu as well. LOL!
UpcomingJedi 5 years ago
lmao Ironicly its 47 seconds..
sorryorange3 5 years ago
Probably a Romanian AKM. 4-6 inch groups are normal. I hit a pop can at 100 yards standing once. 300m is usually described as the AKs effective range but you may be able to hit something at 400, but I've never tried.
spetsnaz5 5 years ago
Who the FUCK is Kolisnikov??? its Kalashnikov. Jeez, good deal of disrespect for the designer right there.
400m on a milk jug is possible, but can take several shots. A decent AK does under 4 inches at 100 meters.
Yep, looked like an AKM to me.
Cheers,
Alex
ancorp2 5 years ago
hm... ak47 arn't in use from years... so it was prabably akm... if not ak74 /but rather akm/...
szymongruszczynski 5 years ago
ak47 are still in fucking use its the best assualt rifle out there its almost impossible to break and easy to clean theyre not used by most countries but i think russia still uses it other then that mostly terriost countrys
lonewolf21 5 years ago
yea everyone else BUT YOU is correct. you have no idea wat your talking about. you know they are the best from watching lord of war a million times. you can probly tell me everything about an uzi then too right? that was on the movie as well. dude, we are fighting people who use ak-47s right now. somalia still uses ak-47s. china uses them. everybody fucking uses them. lol even though i feel bad for bashing you about one little tiny mistake im still going to do it. dont take it personal though.
viraldownload 5 years ago
China doesn't use the Ak-47 anymore. They use a combination of a new weapon called the QBZ-95 and a weapon that resembles an Ak-47 (but has different internal mechanisms).
senorfreebie 4 years ago
yeah cus they figured a way to make the ak-47 into a shotgun and they just went with the new design, its black and all metal. i think it looks stupid cus the ak-47 is popular because its so sexy lookin lol. it is a cool looking gun.
viraldownload 4 years ago
The shotgun that looks like an Ak-47 is actually a Russian design called the Saiga 12. The Chinese Ak-47 advancement is called the Type 81 and is a longer more accurate version. Their current weapon though is the QBZ-95 which is an entirely new design.
senorfreebie 4 years ago
really? i thought that they just took it and made it into both an automatic rifle and a shotgun. well dang lol. i still think the original ak-47 is the best weapon ever
viraldownload 4 years ago
400 meters with an ak. i really doubt that.
JenkyBoom 5 years ago
400 meters? The splat I saw in that vid looked like less than half that. Did you laze it? How did you know it was 400? What was your holdover?
TheFNG556 5 years ago
hahaha 'poofs in the field'
windowlickaz 5 years ago
For some reason the video and sound aren't together but still you can see the poofs in the field
utahpatriot23 5 years ago