At first, I heard this on Grooveshark and thought it was terrible. Then, I searched YouTube. After seeing it with the video, along with your other videos, I think it is brilliant.
So who performed this retro-styled version of it? Obviously it's not from 1965, the style is wrong for the counterculture of that era that would say anything remotely like it, the lyrics would never have gotten anywhere near a radio back then, nor would the cultural references have fit.
I remember almost every event in this video and this mix with the version of Flagpole Sitta is awesome, I was ready to go to Vietnam so I could see Joey Heatherton and Bob Hope, missed it by one year.
How can you think this is the original when his other videos include "Amy Winehouse Rehab 1971 version" and a Country version of Lady Gaga's Bad Romance?
Harvey Danger originally did this right? This is just someone doing it as if it were a 60's song. Come on it talks about rage against the machine and piercing your tongue. Who pierced their tongue in 1965, hell a pierced ear on a man was questionable. It had to be the left ear.
The lyrics to this song are just not 60's lyrics. Come on, who is playing this?
If you actually think that...you need to learn some facts. Go look who the person who wrote the actual song is. It's not hard to cover a song and make it sound from a different era.
You like Pete Townsend? Check out Harvey Danger's cover of his song Save It For Later. (And check out the Who. And Townsend's Rough Mix album with the late great Ronnie Lane.)
This video is so good that I actually thought Harvey Danger was doing a cover of a song from the sixties. However, in 1965 they wouldn't make references to tongue piercing's and Rage Against the Machine. And they certainly wouldn't have said the phrase "God Damn You" in a song. Thanks for the mp3! This is a great video !!!
im not even sure what to say...it sounded good.. not better than the original but not worse either, its just different. how'd you do it? 5/5 very creative
the only reason why I knew this wasn't the orginal is that they wouldn't have used expressions like "god damn you" back in 1965. also they didn't sing about curves of ones body so open, did they?
Great that you give credit to all the celebrities you put into the video, but how about a little love for the performer of the song? Who's doing the cover?
Coverville, yeah, how about some love for the performer!!! That would be me--with a lot of help from Garageband, which I used to overdub all the vocals and instruments. Anyway, I'm perfectly happy to sit in the background, as I can't compete with the Beatles, MLK, and Gilligan!
It's been covered so many effing times, and most people think LIT did the original. Heck, even iTunes has NOTHING by the original artist on it. It's this nebulous being, that hundreds have emulated and almost no one knows the origins of.
It's convincing, I wasn't sure if this was a cover or not at first
CHEAPANDUNCHEERFULL 1 month ago
brilliant
TheJohn5575 2 months ago
At first, I heard this on Grooveshark and thought it was terrible. Then, I searched YouTube. After seeing it with the video, along with your other videos, I think it is brilliant.
Thanks for sharing!
srushaggs 10 months ago
This feels so authentic!
WonderfulLizardOfOz 10 months ago
incredible job
peelugum 11 months ago
Wow! Fantastic video! Very well done.
It's a history lesson in 3 minutes. It's interesting to try to figure out who the people are in the video.
fighttheracists 1 year ago
Comments are pretty bizarre
woohoo5790 1 year ago
Genius
woohoo5790 1 year ago
So who performed this retro-styled version of it? Obviously it's not from 1965, the style is wrong for the counterculture of that era that would say anything remotely like it, the lyrics would never have gotten anywhere near a radio back then, nor would the cultural references have fit.
Merennulli 1 year ago
@Merennulli
This original version of 'Flagpole Sitta' was performed by the band "Ray"...
LockDownOnSparta 4 months ago
This was performed by a band called "Ray" in 1965...
LockDownOnSparta 4 months ago
Is this the original or something?
sdsdsd1222 1 year ago
I remember almost every event in this video and this mix with the version of Flagpole Sitta is awesome, I was ready to go to Vietnam so I could see Joey Heatherton and Bob Hope, missed it by one year.
Lartor 1 year ago 2
Great... job... interesting...
GVike 1 year ago
This is absolutely fantastic!
mthq 1 year ago 2
holy shit this version was lame
but at least it spawned that awesome version by Harvey Danger....
zx6rtt 1 year ago
@zx6rtt other way around... this is the cover.
michaeltgrace 1 year ago
very good video images and gives a great nostalgic feeling . very 60s sounding
lifeboat911 1 year ago 2
That is AWESOME!
brewhaha1555 1 year ago 2
This is amazing!
mariofour 1 year ago 2
LOL!!! Awesome stuff!!! some of you people are dipshits!!
radwayb 1 year ago 3
How can you think this is the original when his other videos include "Amy Winehouse Rehab 1971 version" and a Country version of Lady Gaga's Bad Romance?
Of course Harvey Danger's is the original.
JanineRobin 1 year ago 4
.....yeah im going to just forget this version never existed and only listen to Harveys version.
JoleJupiter 2 years ago
Yeah, who is performing this? Is there a version where 'Damn' isn't censored?
DrLanceAngry 2 years ago 2
whose version is this? this is awesome, the song, the video. love it.
twyceshy 2 years ago 5
Harvey Dangers is the original. You are all tools. Go look at "Flagpole Sitta" on wikipedia.
Mingaggins 2 years ago 4
Harvey Danger originally did this right? This is just someone doing it as if it were a 60's song. Come on it talks about rage against the machine and piercing your tongue. Who pierced their tongue in 1965, hell a pierced ear on a man was questionable. It had to be the left ear.
The lyrics to this song are just not 60's lyrics. Come on, who is playing this?
scumgod13 2 years ago 4
range against the machine was used by the news when some one was angry about the system
APIC4PINY4L3G 2 years ago
not the original, its just how the music is played like a band from 1965. because if u click the user you see 1927 paper planes.
jigypete 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
omg i feel really stupid now!! i though harvey danger's was the original! damn...
Frankenqueen13 2 years ago
Awesome work! Love it!
riotuesday 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
had no idea that this song was made in 1965.
pattso92 2 years ago 2
To all the people that compare this to "the original," this is the original
mromanowicz 2 years ago
How can it be the original if they say Rage Against machines in the song reffering to the band, n00b.
Daltonio5 2 years ago
They say Rage against machines, and not Rage Against The Machine... they didnt refer to the band...
007andrew222 2 years ago 2
If you actually think that...you need to learn some facts. Go look who the person who wrote the actual song is. It's not hard to cover a song and make it sound from a different era.
fivewaysforward 2 years ago
Hah, this is amazing! I love it to bits! Almost more than the original version...
irkenidiot 2 years ago
this is the original dude...
toyuto 2 years ago
better than the original!
N3kk3n 2 years ago
Nice to see something half original -and good- on youtube for once.
jammasterpaz 2 years ago 2
For Once? Jeeze your looking at the wrong things.
purplelobsta 2 years ago
Both The Black Tie Prophets and Harvey Danger did a really great job on this song! You rock! Both of you!
BoogsterSU2 2 years ago 2
whoa.
snowemerald 2 years ago
Excellent!
SharkSport 2 years ago
This is pretty good. Doesn't have the evil, im mad sorta thing that harvey danger does.....but its really good.
P5YOUSUCK 2 years ago 2
The song 8/10
The video 10/10 - was brilliantly edited to appear like the song lyrics & video matched
LazyGamer1982 2 years ago 2
Really, really interesting cover, great video.
sirsapphire04 2 years ago 2
One of the best versions is from The Black Tie Prophets in San Jose!
Juliaqueno 2 years ago
I prefer Harvey Danger's ! It's certain it's a better version !
Messagedepaix 2 years ago
wow, nice vid
cowman57 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ridiculous
mixpix7212 2 years ago
Hater
itsaguinness 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a load of drivvle
hamd01 2 years ago
Cool. But why 1965?
BRP675 2 years ago 7
@BRP675 because it was the age of the beatles bob dylan the zombies.. pretty much the best music ever made.. also the vietnam war lmfao
ThexNerd 1 year ago
Such an awesome cover. Hey, i love the 60's music.
shushbob 2 years ago 5
oh man this is so awesome, the way the song is redone and the video is sick.
craaackle 2 years ago 4
wow, someone went through the effort to do this? that's both sad, amazing, and awesome at the same time.
TeeAreBee 2 years ago 3
huh, there missing the last verse of the song... weird... its one of my favorite verses...
Mortallian18 2 years ago
The band doing this cover is called RAY - but Harvey Danger wrote and recorded this first? This is simply a cover, done in a "1965" style???
DJPaulV 2 years ago 7
Yes, I think you're right.
Firebreather01 2 years ago 3
This is very cool!
Firebreather01 2 years ago 2
Who's doing the audio for this cover? The 60's style vocal stylings & arrangement are great as is the video montage.
ormandye 2 years ago 16
Anyone reminded of the peep show?
ciaran036 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have the newer version on iTunes right now.
I didn't know there was a '60s version now! :O
BoogsterSU2 2 years ago
Inspirational!
BanjoSiren 2 years ago 5
nice! very nice! i love the guitarhero at 2:26! yeah, he´s funny groovin.
silenteff 2 years ago 2
Yeah, that would be Pete Townsend of The Who.
ste3ve 2 years ago 2
that is pete townshead of the who
muscifreak777777 2 years ago
You like Pete Townsend? Check out Harvey Danger's cover of his song Save It For Later. (And check out the Who. And Townsend's Rough Mix album with the late great Ronnie Lane.)
jwtry 2 years ago
English Beat did "Save It For Later", not Pete Townshend
DJPaulV 2 years ago
Yes, the English Beat did a cover version of the song Pete Townshend wrote and recorded on White City
jwtry 2 years ago 3
@beeka
Chuck Norris and Billy Mays were both born way before the sixties, so yes... and I'm pretty sure there weren't much less ninjas then today either.
Only with the x-box, you may have a point. ;-)
CheyenneTallister 2 years ago
Casey Stengal, Hank Aaron, and Jet packs!!!
HDangerism 2 years ago
The moon landing, Andy Warhol, the Beatles. the 60s had it all
Huddiethegreat 2 years ago
did it have chuck norris, billy mays, ninjas, or xbox
beeka111 2 years ago
Comment removed
LazyGamer1982 2 years ago
Comment removed
DJevilstereo 2 years ago
why the heck does the baseball-guy (2:30) always remember me of Colonel Sawyer from World in Conflict???
videofieldsoldier 2 years ago
Haha...in case you're wondering, the Mets manager shown is Casey Stengel. They retired his number (37) in 1965.
rayrey88 2 years ago
This video is so good that I actually thought Harvey Danger was doing a cover of a song from the sixties. However, in 1965 they wouldn't make references to tongue piercing's and Rage Against the Machine. And they certainly wouldn't have said the phrase "God Damn You" in a song. Thanks for the mp3! This is a great video !!!
SMPSKIPPY 2 years ago 5
sweet, where can a get an mp3 of this?
imranino 2 years ago 2
Dude, this was amazing. :D Really good job.
X0NovemberRain0X 2 years ago 3
im not even sure what to say...it sounded good.. not better than the original but not worse either, its just different. how'd you do it? 5/5 very creative
sharpshooter95 2 years ago 6
awesome, i like the little Nancy Sinatra 'Boots are made for walkin' ditty at the end :P
Jiffybob47 2 years ago 4
Lol brilliant :)
jpruk0 2 years ago 3
fuckin awsome love this better then harvey danger
countdookumjc 2 years ago 3
Listen well and you'll believe the lies.
Mathixe28 2 years ago
Pretty fantastic. Can you make this available in MP3 or similar format?
jordikro 2 years ago 6
the only reason why I knew this wasn't the orginal is that they wouldn't have used expressions like "god damn you" back in 1965. also they didn't sing about curves of ones body so open, did they?
ThiefOskar 2 years ago 5
Oh, yeah, now I remember seeing this song performed on "Shindig" -- or was it "Hullabaloo"?
No, seriously...heard it on "Coverville," and just wanted to compliment you on the excellent cover. Great job!
trainman74 2 years ago 4
genius. that is one class cover excellent video as well. sounds so genuine im not surprised theres so many confused comments!
Morzadec 2 years ago 4
Great that you give credit to all the celebrities you put into the video, but how about a little love for the performer of the song? Who's doing the cover?
coverville 2 years ago 6
Coverville, yeah, how about some love for the performer!!! That would be me--with a lot of help from Garageband, which I used to overdub all the vocals and instruments. Anyway, I'm perfectly happy to sit in the background, as I can't compete with the Beatles, MLK, and Gilligan!
rayrey88 2 years ago 3
This song deserves an internet meme.
And not by this cover, I mean the original.
It's been covered so many effing times, and most people think LIT did the original. Heck, even iTunes has NOTHING by the original artist on it. It's this nebulous being, that hundreds have emulated and almost no one knows the origins of.
Eiarocks 2 years ago
This was done after the Harvey Danger version because its Harvey Danger's song, they didnt do a cover of this one, its the other way around.
mcflu 2 years ago
Comment removed
BouncyTH 2 years ago
I never said that. I just said the orignal was better.
BouncyTH 2 years ago
Maybe a little scepticism is in order? Anyone notice no one actually singing the song, perhaps a hoax?
Gingerbreadrunner 2 years ago
Well I feel stupid haha didn't know it was a cover.
paisleypower30 2 years ago 2
Great!!!!!
chickentimer 2 years ago 2
ahhh the 1960's
mattroks101 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
BouncyTH 2 years ago
Very good! What band is this?
stramt 2 years ago 3
Ok. That's pretty fantastic.
innerturmoil 2 years ago 4