Yawehking u sound so pretentious and loathe in your own self satisfaction that by some method to which only you know, you alone should be admired and worshipped like god himself just for presenting someone elses work, plagiarizing is what they call it, wether it's on you tube or not, I think I hate you passionately , more to the point the video is shit , the information is there without your shit video adding to the list of other shit videos on you tube so I suggest you drop the laptop off in
Enjoyed this vid very much! I will often watch vids debating gods existence and learn from reading the varied comments. Inevitably, it gets to a point where the shit starts flying and I wonder, why do they do this over and over? Argue and push to the point where they feel terrible. I guess I must be a thinker with no inclination to prove anything to anyone. It can be mighty entertaining though! Great share, my friend!!
I "think" this style of video is boring but I sat thru it out of curiosity. I'd much rather hear a narration rather than watching a mangled style of text slooooowwly appear on a screen where it is not contrasted enough to the background to see it properly.
I do agree that people believe what is comfortable for them to believe. Reason, for the most part, takes a back seat in the thought process while Emotion rules the day. Edward Bernays used this bit of understanding to its fullest.
@ScalerWave I'm not here to feed your endorphins. I provide information from sources I feel say it better than I can, and it is up to you, dear viewer to come to your own conclusions. I thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to drag yourself through such a miserable undertaking, but your commentary not only sheds light on my incapacity for perfection, it also shows that despite my tireless effort to provide the world free information, douchebags will still trash it. Thank you. :)
heh heh why all the drama? Not very philosophical IMO. I don't recall insulting you or trashing your "work". The question was posed "What do you think" ....well? there ya go. It seems that you would prefer empty praise over honest opinions. I understand though, we're all overly emotional beings.
@ScalerWave No sir, empty praise is simply that, empty. Your words (as you know) have an underlying sarcasm that you avoid with another layer of sarcasm meant to demean, not question. You know this and yet you cover it with another layer.. Why? I don't know, but I will react the way I choose, not the way you want me to. Dramatic? No, not as I see it, as honest critique is welcome, but as demonstrated in this comment, you are more concerned with delegitamizing than discussing.
Well you are entitled to your opinion. I don't agree with it though. Honestly, your video is boring to watch and very slow to get to the point. The text is hard to read because the font style tries to be flashy instead of functional. There is not enough contrast in certain parts making it impossible to even read. I don't usually even sit thru these types of videos. You asked what I thought and I told you, simple. You read sarcasm where there is none.
@ScalerWave The text I used was to symbolize psychosis (JTHM), and used the text-by-letter to symbolize typewriter. Yes, I know it can often be boring, but that is only when you are concerned over entertainment. So, that critique is legitimate, and I accept it. However, to emphasize your boredom is in a sense hypocritical as you are implying information must "entertain" you. I use a laptop and ride a bicycle around the country, so I am not as you would say "equipped" to do much more. sorry..
@PhilosopherFresh Thanks 4 passing this along to me...very fine work...put it in my plytlst...we must analyze our present state of mind, and realize that it is deluded or if we stop thinking so much we will see everything...♥
@steveoo5 Im not condoning atheism, only the transcendence of superstitious belief structures. So perhaps in your atheist dichotomy you see that as pavlov's dog will salivate, you too are salivating for a substance that you do not understand, and your disappointment in my material is not only hypocritical, it's an affirmation to everyone that even in your search for the logical, you still connect with the illogical, even if it is only to patronize it with your satirical commentary. yur silly.
The thinker and the prover are what have long been used in religion. And scientists who, as a priesthood, mold the beliefs of society no matter how far off base they are. It's amazing to think how many people would just accept what was said without realizing that they were being programmed by the random thoughts of certain individuals. Good for empirical agendas though. Good video Josh!
Great music. Who is it?
Floorsnarl 4 months ago
hard to read
caseyspaos 9 months ago
A bin or give it to an artist... Get back on your bike and fuck off you Gorky bastard
itsREDONE 9 months ago
Yawehking u sound so pretentious and loathe in your own self satisfaction that by some method to which only you know, you alone should be admired and worshipped like god himself just for presenting someone elses work, plagiarizing is what they call it, wether it's on you tube or not, I think I hate you passionately , more to the point the video is shit , the information is there without your shit video adding to the list of other shit videos on you tube so I suggest you drop the laptop off in
itsREDONE 9 months ago
Enjoyed this vid very much! I will often watch vids debating gods existence and learn from reading the varied comments. Inevitably, it gets to a point where the shit starts flying and I wonder, why do they do this over and over? Argue and push to the point where they feel terrible. I guess I must be a thinker with no inclination to prove anything to anyone. It can be mighty entertaining though! Great share, my friend!!
mikwid 1 year ago
I "think" this style of video is boring but I sat thru it out of curiosity. I'd much rather hear a narration rather than watching a mangled style of text slooooowwly appear on a screen where it is not contrasted enough to the background to see it properly.
I do agree that people believe what is comfortable for them to believe. Reason, for the most part, takes a back seat in the thought process while Emotion rules the day. Edward Bernays used this bit of understanding to its fullest.
ScalerWave 1 year ago
@ScalerWave I'm not here to feed your endorphins. I provide information from sources I feel say it better than I can, and it is up to you, dear viewer to come to your own conclusions. I thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to drag yourself through such a miserable undertaking, but your commentary not only sheds light on my incapacity for perfection, it also shows that despite my tireless effort to provide the world free information, douchebags will still trash it. Thank you. :)
yawehking 1 year ago
@yawehking
heh heh why all the drama? Not very philosophical IMO. I don't recall insulting you or trashing your "work". The question was posed "What do you think" ....well? there ya go. It seems that you would prefer empty praise over honest opinions. I understand though, we're all overly emotional beings.
ScalerWave 1 year ago
@ScalerWave No sir, empty praise is simply that, empty. Your words (as you know) have an underlying sarcasm that you avoid with another layer of sarcasm meant to demean, not question. You know this and yet you cover it with another layer.. Why? I don't know, but I will react the way I choose, not the way you want me to. Dramatic? No, not as I see it, as honest critique is welcome, but as demonstrated in this comment, you are more concerned with delegitamizing than discussing.
In Lak'ech
yawehking 1 year ago
@yawehking
Well you are entitled to your opinion. I don't agree with it though. Honestly, your video is boring to watch and very slow to get to the point. The text is hard to read because the font style tries to be flashy instead of functional. There is not enough contrast in certain parts making it impossible to even read. I don't usually even sit thru these types of videos. You asked what I thought and I told you, simple. You read sarcasm where there is none.
SW
ScalerWave 1 year ago
@ScalerWave The text I used was to symbolize psychosis (JTHM), and used the text-by-letter to symbolize typewriter. Yes, I know it can often be boring, but that is only when you are concerned over entertainment. So, that critique is legitimate, and I accept it. However, to emphasize your boredom is in a sense hypocritical as you are implying information must "entertain" you. I use a laptop and ride a bicycle around the country, so I am not as you would say "equipped" to do much more. sorry..
yawehking 1 year ago
Well, if you think so...
NLPNVC 1 year ago
WOW, WOW, WOW! AMAZING!
Temya9 1 year ago
amazing, my friend; excellent; philosophy and poetry, joined in a fluid sequence. i take my cap off,
your brother in words
john
SuperBluehaze 1 year ago
Wow, this is great man! I absolutely love this! It totally resonated with me big time! Faved this one, keep up the fantastic work!!
PhilosopherFresh 1 year ago
@PhilosopherFresh Thanks 4 passing this along to me...very fine work...put it in my plytlst...we must analyze our present state of mind, and realize that it is deluded or if we stop thinking so much we will see everything...♥
alonealotta 1 year ago
loved the music, great sync with visuals. Happy that ive thought myself well. Hell a strange concept. Peace.
createrainbowz 1 year ago
"belief is the birth of ignorance"
pwillits80 1 year ago
horrible conclusion, very disappointing, I feel tricked... I'm already an atheist
steveoo5 1 year ago
@steveoo5 Im not condoning atheism, only the transcendence of superstitious belief structures. So perhaps in your atheist dichotomy you see that as pavlov's dog will salivate, you too are salivating for a substance that you do not understand, and your disappointment in my material is not only hypocritical, it's an affirmation to everyone that even in your search for the logical, you still connect with the illogical, even if it is only to patronize it with your satirical commentary. yur silly.
yawehking 1 year ago
@yawehking good rebuttal man! I don't think he got the point of this video at all .. .he actually proved the point the video is trying to make! lol
PhilosopherFresh 1 year ago
The thinker and the prover are what have long been used in religion. And scientists who, as a priesthood, mold the beliefs of society no matter how far off base they are. It's amazing to think how many people would just accept what was said without realizing that they were being programmed by the random thoughts of certain individuals. Good for empirical agendas though. Good video Josh!
ancestralblue 1 year ago
pretty good!!! congratulation!!!
love and light
Namaste
misssuperyogart 1 year ago