Keith Olbermann cannot tell the difference between volition and coercion

[mcoop221]

Easy Keith, the government SHOULD NOT TAKE CARE OF IT! NO MATTER WHAT!

It is not the care of the government to care for the people medically! It IS NOT IN OUR CONSTITUTION. It is also about CHARITY!

[bizzyb0ne017]

@mcoop221 God you're a greedy ass hole

[mcoop221]

@bizzyb0ne017

Ummm, okay.

[bizzyb0ne017]

@mcoop221 You value a piece of paper over the life of a human being right? Thats what your statement seemed to me. Yes or no?

[mcoop221]

@bizzyb0ne017 Not quite following. If you mean our COTUS then it's not about your question. You have the option to move north to Canada or east to the UK or to the south to Mexico where they have 'free healthcare.' Of course, it's not free at all!

So to answer your question, yes. Because that piece of paper [COTUS] protects us from govt run healthcare and the needless deaths of tens of thousands or more of Americans.

[CHUCKtheFED]

Olberman the doberman

has he had his shots?

[SelfImmolator]

I agree that Coburn wasn't really being hypocritical, he was just being naive. He was borrowing a common libertarian magical-utopia argument.

In the real world, you can't get every community to be a nice 'traditional' friendly place where neighbors help each other. You will be leaving millions out.

I too am annoyed that Keith only talks to people he agrees with and just gets them to "Yes" his opinions. I still agree with him on most of the general points though.