David Horowitz - Party of Defeat

[crmac56]

Howard Dean and the dems sold their souls to the devil to try to take the white house in 2004. They are the true war criminals. I love how well Horowitz articulates that whole senario. When I read, or hear leftwing lunitics trying refute the solid and well documented logic of Party of Defeat, I wonder what what planet I woke up on.

[lashkaretoiba]

I dare people who call horowitz a fascist to debate him. The man is a open minded agnostic conservative. He will own you. He's already took down 3 or 4 big names who tried to debunk his claims in party of defeat. They could not do it. He is even offering 500 dollars to whoever can disprove the thesis.

Stop ad hom attacking and get that 500 bucks. I tried and got schooled. Give it a shot.

[alienmoonbase]

the middle east could be an internet cafe, the new radio free american but with about 10 geosynchronous internet satellites located directly over every islamic nation.

all for free, with the purpose of emancipating humans from a the bonds of ignorance - fundamentalist islam

[alienmoonbase]

they don't have "full access" to our intelligence.

UFO DISCLOSURE will destroy Islam. Disclosure should be strategically deployed as a means to totally destroy fundamentalism.

OR, we need to turn the middle east into a wifi hotspot. Anyone with a notebook, pc, smart phone, etc, would access the power of the internet to liberate humanity and empower the individuals.

[321lawc]

@alienmoonbase Or just nuke Mecca

[Jhensy2001]

Absolute bullseye by Mr. Horowitz.

[dartagnansblade]

He is exactly right. Dems have sold out the soldiers for political gain. The facts cannot be denied. A bunch of idiot, fringe, college imbeciles are led by the nose as "protesters" and moveon siezes the the moment and ...voila ..suddenly we have a hysterical leftist movement which has cost the lives of 10s of thousands of Iraqis and hundreds of American soldiers. Durbin, Kerry, Gore, Kennedy, Reid, Pelosi.........should be HUNG!

[JeffersDodge]

I can't find part 2 of this fascinating talk...

[Realist223]

Does this mean anything to you? If it doesn't, then you have substantiated your critics' judgment that the Left anti-war crowd are fundamentally treasonous. Not because you disagree with the war, but because we you are impervious to reason, except any reason that might cast the US and its intentions in an unfavorable light. So, there you go, Traitors!

[Realist223]

I have a copy of the speech. The actual words are "sought to buy yellowcake in West Africa." Excuse me, Alex dear, doesn't it mean anything to you that Iraq had three nuclear programs destroyed, one by Israel in 1981, the next by the Iraq war of 1990 and the final one by the UN in 1996, but only after Saddam's son-in-law defected with documents and revealed a program that was being run right under the noses of the UN inspectors?

[Realist223]

As for Alex, it is not the disagreement with the war, dummy. It is the cynical manipulation of events to paint the President as a traitor and terrorist worse than Saddam. More comments to follow.

Indeed, it has been shown that Iraq sent a trade delegation to Niger, which only exports yellowcake as a meaningful export. Or do you want to believe that Iraq's trade delegation went there to buy chickpeas. Bush's speech actually didn't even mention Niger.

[Realist223]

Infidel1334, SystemXpander and alexallen1000: Your responses show you to be the true idiots. Horowitz=Fascist Scum, looks like a Rabbi. What are you, children. Well, actually, yes you are. You obviously know nothing about the Iraqi situation other than what your group-thinking fellow children have gotten you to believe.

[Infidel1334]

Horowitz = Fascist Scum

[SystemXpander]

He looks like a Rabbi.

[alexallen1000]

Idiot. So diagreeing with the decision to go to war should not be allowed? And being right that there were no WMDs is something Democrats should be ashamed of? The trade of uranium with Niger was found to be completely unfounded. This entire video is a mess.

[getplaning]

Christ, what a liar. Actually, what Horowitz just referenced was not part of the Senate report, but rather one sentence from a British government inquiry that wasn't published until a week after the Senate report came out. Meanwhile, he slams liberals who question the war -- calling them anti-American in his columns in FrontPage Magazine -- but never speaks of his fellow conservatives who likewise are outraged about the mess in Iraq.