Added: 3 years ago
From: Desertphile
Views: 8,413
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (387)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Coookooooo piss take x += pie ha ha spookmore

  • You look off your trolly mate.......your not really believable so i call you a big liar.spookmore

  • I'll invest!

  • Indeed, Lutec will never actually build the devices they have already sold, nor will their "investors" ever see so much as a dime of their money returned to them. But one cannot reason with people who desperately want to be robbed.

  • You are correct. These magnetic generators cannot be more than 100% efficient. Lutec is a sham and if we are wrong, then why hasn't it gone BIG and solved all he problems. Maybe if the Lutec device is powered by Magic Unicorn pixie dust then it would work.

  • Well...you could have close to a 100% energy conversion........if you detonate antimatter. You wont live to use the converted energy; but it makes one hell of a fire cracker lol

  • What ignorant people! THEY ARE NOT DEFYING ANY LAWS OF PHYSICS! These magnets need a pulse motor (a little device that turns the electric currant on and off) to operate the electric current needed to make the magnets work is ... But the magnet then contributes it's energy you get for free .... Then you subtract heat and friction lose of .... And you get a net energy of .... You can then factor whatever you put in and got out for your efficiency of .... I don't claim to know the figures or if it

  • @VtBudgies I did further research. that shit doesn't look real.

  • Nbnjnh

  • It seems to me that all the people (debunkers) that have problems with these ideas have a problem with the term over unity or free energy, energy created from nothing! Is it just me or do they forget that most of these devices use magnetic energy produced from rare earth magnets which have a measurable force, so its not creating energy from nothing its just converting it. Nobody seems to have a problem with nuclear energy but that's just created from a simple metal. correct me if i'm wrong

  • you'll never gain energy, you'll never break even, you will always lose, efficiency will never be more than 99% and thats proven, otherwise we would have had it by now.

  • @rickcrouch "otherwise we would have had it by now" ...

  • I love how people think they have the entire 'Physics' realm figured out and equated. Much like the 'Bible', physics were inked by man, and just like the bible, are not infallible. Science is a religion based off of 'Faith', faith that they know what they are talking about, faith that their equations in one circumstance, works for every other circumstance in the Universe. Nothing can go faster than the speed of light, but then we have the speed of thought. So Will it Blend?

  • @Tenatiouz that's why we can modify the physical laws dumbass. ''speed of thought'' stfu and get off crack. the speed of thought is the speed of the electrical impulsions in your brain.

  • @fenix144 Oh we have ourselves a regular Einstein here. You're just a great big ball of wisdom now aren't you!

  • @Tenatiouz not a einstein. intelligent enough to know what a kid should know. wisdom as nothing to do with knowledge.

  • @fenix144 That comment I left was sarcasm, the "Speed of Light vs Speed of Thought", was an argument, made by SCIENTISTS on national t.v.. You just pointed out the fact what's so obvious to most anyone with common sense. To rectify their statement they tossed in the "action at a distance" quantum theories. I love how you internet warriors don't let anything get by you hahahahha.

  • @Tenatiouz what kind of pseudo scientist were they?

  • @Tenatiouz just went to read about the theory. you're a dumbass.

  • @fenix144 Not only can you not reply to someone without attacking them, you also lack common sense to catch a Rhetorical statement. You're just another public school failure, probably around 16, considering you still use acronyms to define your sentences. Get a dictionary a form a more proper statement you moron...

  • @Tenatiouz yeah clearly I'm the dumb one speaking about things I haven't read about.

  • @fenix144 Again, everything just flies right over your head. Like I said before, You're just a great ball of wisdom now aren't you.

  • @Tenatiouz yet again wisdom has nothing to do with knowledge.

  • @fenix144 Oh but it does. I love the oxymoron you keep posting.

  • @fenix144 What you lack is a good dictionary, I guess they don't hand those out in High Schools anymore.

  • @Tenatiouz I'm french canadian. If you think you can manage to speak both french and english better than me, go ahead, I'll have a discussion with you in french.

  • @fenix144 I'm Mexican American, if you think you can speak Spanish and English better than me, go ahead, I'll have a discussion with you in Spanish.

  • @fenix144 I guess they don't have English dictionaries in your Country? Ha ha, well kid you absolutely fail at debating issues. Not only can you not conduct yourself in a professional manner, you also have no idea what the theories being discussed are. I'm going to depart this Forum, and venture onwards. You have yourself a fine day there kiddo.

  • Comment removed

  • @Tenatiouz Un sot trouve toujours un plus sot qui l'admire.

  • @Tenatiouz /watch?v=3IDf3_fe5nA

  • You really have no clue what you're on about.

  • This guy was just paid to read from a script. Nobody's listening to the "skeptics" anymore. The esoteric technology kept by the globalists is being uncovered more and more everyday.

  • There seems to be some misunderstanding about Einstein's famous equation. E=mc^2 does not mean a wound grandfather clock weighs more than an unwound grandfather clock. It means that a certain amount of mass has an equivalent amount of massless energy (photons). It is also the formula by which relativistic mass is calculated from the sum of kinetic energy and rest energy (energy equivalent of object's mass), divided by c squared.

  • Also, moving at relativistic speed does not add mass to your spaceship. It SIMULATES added mass. This is the easier way of conceiving of the non-intuitive concept of linear (special) relativity. To mass, the speed of light is infinite speed, and requires an infinite amount of energy expenditure to get there. If you were going the speed of light, it would seem like infinite speed because of time dilation. You guys should read more before claiming working knowledge.

  • And E=MC2 is to do with mass and the speed at which an object moves....the closer an object moves torwards the speed of light the heavier it gets, not DC motors, and AC generators rotating at a low rpm. Perhaps we should re-think some of the laws of Physics, the great Bob Dylan even once said "these times, there are a changing"

  • @the5k0k3r E=mc^2 has to do with the energy conversion equivalent of mass and energy. This equation says nothing about the mass and speed of a particular object, nor concludes that matter cannot exceed c. Special relativity does all that. The underlying Law of physics never changes, but our description of it does: it gets more detailed and corrects itself. Technically there are no "laws" in any science, just exceedingly good guesses that are never proven wrong.

  • Science is not your field. You should go into selling fishing equipment. Hum. You should research more effectively on what your fear. Magnetic energy works. Hum I wonder who paid you to air your negative thoughts.

  • @BartleyNorman ; "Magnetic energy works."

    No. There is no such thing.

  • To those who believe in the potential of Lutec - why the heck wouldn't you invest???

    You'll be rich!

  • Yea imposible as you understand it

  • These laws of science can change: for example

    Recently scientist found bacteria that lives in arsenic.

    Lithium CR123 batterys are much more powerful and lighter then AA lithium batterys.

    so...explain why laws of physics are not flawed?

  • @clap5 ; No, the laws of physics never change. They have existed for 13.7 billion years.

  • @Desertphile

    I gave you perfectly good examples of modern technology and a new discovery that litterly changed the "laws".

  • @Desertphile Man wrote the "LAWS" of physics! Just wondering what are your credentials? What did everyone tell the Wright brothers before they made there first powered flight....."impossible" "Cant be done" Dec 17, 1903 they proved everyone wrong! What part of the Lutec videos do you think are false? Do you suppose its a total fake all together? I'm not trying to be an asshole at all, just trying to look through your eyes.

  • There was also a lot of doubt about breaking the 'sound barrier'. Neither of these two accomplishments were ever perceived impossible by physicists, only by laypeople. Overunity machines violate the very rules by which they operate: THIS is why it's a dumb idea. Tesla's "free energy generator" is a rational idea, but the energy CAME from somewhere (the electrical field of earth).

  • @the5k0k3r man wrote the laws of physics according to the behaviour of the physical world. stfu you fale.

  • @clap5 The best way to teach Desertphile a lesson is to buy shares in Lutec and get filthy rich. Put your money where your mouth is....

  • @LorneHess

    Because I would personally like to have a unit sent to my house and independly test it for at least 3 years.

  • @clap5 ''Recently scientist found bacteria that lives in arsenic.

    Lithium CR123 batterys are much more powerful and lighter then AA lithium batterys.'' how the fuck does that relate to physics law? our current physical laws describe accurately our reality. I tried to find infos on the lutec 1000. I'd love to see that. but it's really shady.

  • @clap5 No... "nothing can live in arseic" has never ben a law.

    And an AA lithium battery got more amps.

  • @clap5 A 3 litre BMW engine produces more power than a 7 litre v8 out of a lame Cadillac. Mike Tyson hit harder than my fat grandfather despite weighing half as much. Some students actually like the chicken and mushroom flavoured pot-noodle. None of those things break the laws of physics just like none of the things you mentioned do. Simple question: If you use the output of one of these devices to power another, you'd need very few of them to power the world. WHERE does the energy come from?

  • screw your fucking head on and open you fucking eyes. No one is blinder than those who will not see........

  • @rlmartin2222 ; Okay, I give up. What is you you claim to "see?"

  • @Desertphile Forget it. They have the weight of a thousand bullshit conspiracy sites backing them up. They have been fooled into believing every conspiracy they are sold by the conspiracy industry because they are so afraid of being fooled by secret government/alien alliances.

  • Wow and you think you're more intelligent? Science is constantly being re-written as people notice its flaws, it is only based on mere theories, do you know what that means? Yet you believe in it as if it is flawless, alike majority of scientist-smartasses, and when a flaw is noticed and a theory is dis-proven you move on to the next one that makes more sense to you and act just the same as before. Bigotry? Free-energy exists, stop being so closed-minded.

    Nothing is impossible, fuck yourself.

  • @iRyaan ; "Free energy" is impossible,. idiot.

  • @iRyaan If you believe - invest in Lutec! You're missing a golden opportunity to get rich and save the world in the process!

  • then he passed out.

    must have been the beer...

  • @Desertphile It's not magic it's a magnetic field. This isn't a case of something from nothing. It's not as if energy goes in and comes out stronger by magic. Energy goes in and disrupts a magnetic field temporarily which doesn't require much energy compared with the kinetic energy expressed by the magnet moving.

  • @trippinlikegod ; "It's not magic it's a magnetic field."

    Anyone who claims magnetic fields can perform work without a source of energy are claiming it's done by magic. The crooks at Lutec are defrauding people: free energy is impossible.

  • both calculations seem to be correct.

    however, the LUTEC website clearly states that the motor has managed to seperate the DC input and the AC output. you have included the DC input in your calculations to 'wind down' the output. clearly something is a-miss. however, we stil haven't seen this motor in production yet. the 'input' you mentioned earlier in the piece could possibly be the battery providing DC energy for the moment to initiate.

  • Really if energy is leaving a system then it is losing mass, not gaining it. Even after it gave off 8 Giga Watts of power it would have lost only about what ? 1 gram of mass? Something like that. 

  • Wow !!! you are such a fucking moron dude !! its pathetic.... i guess in your case , ignorance is bliss,......

  • @malachie33333 Isn't it kind of pathetic to post a message like that on a video in the first place?

    Interestingly enough, there are, in fact, many overunity claims on the internet, especially youtube, some covered by semi-major news networks. However, none of these overunity devices have EVER been put into mass production, or had any sort of independent verification. There are two possible reasons for this.

  • The first is that it is all a conspiracy, and the oil companies dont want you to have it. This is, quite frankly, bullshit. It goes right up there with the other retarded conspiracy theories, like ones about "secret jewish orders" and the like. The other explanation is, of course, that the technology does not work. Even without doing any calculation, you can weigh these up and pretty quickly decide which is more likely to be correct. With the physics, however, we can see for certain.

  • The only minutely well known over unity claim is steorn orbo, which got quite a lot of PR for their device. However, an independent board of scientists was set up to review this claim. Their findings showed that they were given no evidence that the motor did, in fact, produce overunity. Moreover, almost all of these over unity claims(~90%) claim to be "about to enter mass production" or be commercially exploitable in a few years. It is 2011... do you see any in the shops? no? i wonder why not...

  • @benboy00 ; Indeed, the USA government would =LOVE= for the USA to have free energy: the USA subsidizes gasoline and coal, and it cots everyone a bloody hell of a lot of money for that subsidy. And as you noted: many thousands of crooks insist they have free energy devices, yet zero have stepped forward and demonstrated their claim is true. It's all a scam: a fraud.

  • do you smoke crack you wacky zany yank! Get off the drugs and get a job.

  • @skulzarg ; Huh?

  • Comment removed

  • @iTzSissyGirl ; Australians have been defrauding people just as long as Americans, yes I know.

  • Your shitty theories and videos are soooo FASCINATING, Maybe you should spend your time smoking your Dope dude.

  • Gday bud

    I just started watching your vids and find them very entertaining and informative...love the sarcasm.

    now first up i am not a scientist or at that a particularly intelligent person but i have common sense and get by just fine, my question is in reference to your E=mc2 explination of this Lutec generator, would the same restrictions of mass apply if the device in question was used in space? correct me if i am wrong but would einstines therory only apply on earth and not in space?

  • @ArcaneDevo G'day. Einstein's theory applies everywhere in our universe. That's the cool thing about real science.

  • You need to be locked up in a mental facility so that the world can stop suffering.

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon ; Upon what grounds do you propose I be locked up?

  • rpm times newtons equals watts?!? amps times ohms equals watts?!? YOU JUST MADE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT!!!!! The first thing they teach you in electronics is that voltage times current divided by resistance equals wattage.

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon ; "voltage times current divided by resistance equals wattage" We're talking OUTPUT power, you shit-for-brains clown, not input. Sheeeish. Do try to keep up, or sod off.

  • @Desertphile OUTPUT WATTS IS THE SAME FORMULA AS INPUT WATTS! A WATT IS A WATT! They claim electrical overunity. How do you measure electical oveunity? Compare INPUT WATTS to OUTPUT WATTS!

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon ; THE OUTPUT OF THIS DEVICE IS MECHANICAL, NOT ELECTRICITY. CALCULATING THE POWER OUT IS THEREFORE TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN MEASURING THE POWER IN. Seeeish: ty to keep the fuck up, or go away.

  • @Desertphile THE OUTPUT OF THE MACHINE IS ELECTRICAL!!!!! IT IS AN ELECTRICAL GENERATOR!!!!!!!!!! THE WHOLE POINT OF BUILDING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE IS TO GENERATE MORE ELECTRICITY THAN IT USES!!!!! You obviously don't know what your talking about, so just shut up...

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon ; THE ELECTRICAL *AND* MECHANICAL POWER IS MEASURED, IDIOT. AND IT SHOWS A 32% EFFICIENCY, NOT THE 2000%+ THE CROOKS CLAIM. Try to keep up, clown.

  • @Desertphile Wow you really cannot admit you are wrong. The electrical input from a battery bank is about 7.2 kilowatts. The output is around 24 kilowatts.

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon ; Produce evidence that every scientist on the plant is wrong, and then I will "admit" I am wrong.

    There is no such thing as "over unity" because 1 is always less than 2.

  • @TheNuclearWatermelon LOL you actually really do think over unity is possible. Congrats! you are now a millionaire. All you have to do is give a quick demo to James Randi just to test out your over unity device. That of course will be no problem for you as you have the math and working prototype to prove it works ;)

    Again congratulations. I am a little surprised a millionaire like you doesn't have a product out yet though.

  • @psychcisco ; Hell, Randi's one million dollars is peanuts to what such a device would be worth. The device could be sold outright for hundreds of billions of dollars; the patent alone would be worth many billions of dollars.

  • @Desertphile True 1 million would be penuts. But considering Lutec are still asking for investors (with as little as 100USD). I think we can both agree, why not take an easy million if the device works? LOL we both know the answer though dont we.

  • @psychcisco ; Yeah, one million USA dollars is nothing to sneeze at. The crooks do not claim it because they can get more swindling their victims.

  • There is absolutly no reason for it to gain weight. If you had any common sense, you would read about it and find out that the generator is over 100% efficient because it uses short pulses of electricity to drive the motor, but it is constantly generating electricity due to inertia on the flywheel. Since constant is longer than short pulses, the output is higher in amp-hours and equal in voltage than the input, creating overunity.

  • According to the bullschit you are talking you must weigt at least 10.000 ponds of donky droppings. Kind regards Lu Brits.

  • @MsThevoyager ; What?

  • Donky, From Lu Brits

  • Please answer this question. If I have two magnets and I hold them apart in my hands, and measure force times the time. and I find that my energy expended was greater than the energy expended to make the magnets, did I not achieve over unity? So what's wrong with a system that spins mechanically and pulses polarity to spin like mad power?

  • @robertsutter ; I answered that question over and over and over again, literally hundreds of times! See MIT lecture series 8.02, Lecture Number 11.;

  • @robertsutter No, If you hold them still the potential energy remains constant, no work is done and nothing changes.

  • I have a hard time believeing that someone seemingly intelligent enough to at least make a video and post it could be so ignorant of the physics that he is trying to demogogue! Guess it takes a whole lot less intelligence to post a video than to understand some pretty basic scientific concepts. Maxwell had it right to begin with. Just takes a little understanding of the math to grasp the concept.

  • Funny how you somehow forgot to mention anything wrong in this video.

    Idiot.

  • Egophile.

    Yours is the sort of retarded logic that weakens the nation.

    Every school kid recognizes there is some energy resident in magnets when they try pushing 2 like poles together, or try to keep opposite poles apart.

    The guys at Lutec succeeded in harnessing that energy efficiently to spin a rotor.

    Egophile, the sun has baked your head; or possibly you are jealous you did not think of trying to do this yourself?

  • No; no; no; no; and no.

  • What an ego. If it were possible it would already have been invented! That is the sort of logic that retards the nation.

    Everyone knows there is energy resident in magnets. These guys found a way to harness it. Egophile is pissed that he did not think of it.

  • Yes, if "free energy" were impossible, scientists would have done it already. Deal with it.

  • @Desertphile That's idiotic on astonishing amount of levels.

    Imagine for a second your line of thinking before the combustion engine.

    "If it were possible to harness energy from oil, we would have already done that."

  • Combustion engines do not violate the laws of natural, silly. "Free energy" does.

  • @Desertphile Don't shift goal posts, that's not what you said.

  • @SexyMelon

    Oil is not an energy. Oil is an energy carrier. A method to store energy. Hence you cannot produce energy from oil. What you can do, and what we do in the internal combustion engine is that we can release the energy stored in oil by burning it.

  • @ParadoxAzuremyst Quite right. "Extracting" energy would be the technically correct term, I think.

    I was actually arguing against the notion that because something hasn't been invented yet, it never will be. E.g. because combustion engine wasn't invented in 16th century, it wouldn't be invented in 19th either.

  • @SexyMelon ; Nowhere in my video did I make that argument.

  • @Desertphile No, you made it in a reply to me.

  • @write2topcat

    Magnetism is not energy. It is a force. Major difference.

  • You look like an implant... A misguider. You will be filtered by the wise.

  • Overunity exists you stupid moron. People like you who claim there is no vacuum energy are the biggest advocates of perpetual motion because THEN, you can't explain the motion of electron and you can't explain the motion of planets. Would you say that all the motion was created at the beginning of the universe? Crack Head!

  • the guy is a smart ass

  • According to the laws of science. A few hundred years ago the world was flat, gods gave you rain, and the earth was the center of the solar system. The first people to dispute that may have met a few naysayers as well.

  • @TravSchallock No, No, and No.

  • That's a clear denail. You had enough space to refute those points.

  • If you believe that science created the world then we can simply alter the laws of science to alter the world.

    If however you believe the laws of science were written from observations people made of the world then it's entirely possible that they don't exactly describe the world.

    You cannot say that our understanding of the world is 100% complete therefore things that don't fit that understanding don't exist. That would mean that science defines the world, not the other way round.

  • The "laws of science" were written by humans; the issue is the laws of physics, which existed for 13.7 billion years.

  • So in that case how can you be so sure that Lutec have got it wrong?

  • Lutec has it wrong because they claim an energy efficiency of their motors greater than 100%.

  • Yeah and the coeficiant of friction cannot be greater than 100%. This means that cars cannot pull more than 1G and cannot accellerate to 60mph in 3 seconds. However such things do happen because rubber is 'sticky' and grips harder than the weight of the vehical.

    If energy efficiency law is wrong but everyone still obeys it, then they will never notice if they get back 120%

    It's a circular argument to say it can't happen because the law says so. Especially if it is observed.

  • When you feed current into a coil you inflate a magnetic field. When you let the magnetic field deflate you get current back out.

    Conventionally you get back out what you put in with a bit of loss due to heat. You may also get it out at a higher voltage, but not more energy.

    What if when the field deflated it pulled some extra energy with it. Energy that was sitting there in the space occupied by the field? Or maybe attracted by the field?

    A sort of 'heat pump' for magnetic power.

  • The amount of energy we are talking about does not weigh a great deal so the machine getting heavier is not a big issue.

    Compared to the amount of energy locked up in atoms and flowing through the solar system the amount of energy these motors produce is small.

    I don't think the makers are claiming that they create energy but tap into energy that's already there.

  • Dressing and acting like that is destroing your credibility..you look like a junky....grow up...your like 50 years old...at 0:45 you so fucking stupid...you look like an idiot

  • Translation: you were unable to spot any error in my video, and that frustrated you to such an extent that the best you could do in reply was to try an insult. How very sad your worthless life must be.

  • look at me... i'm smarter than everyone!

  • Steorn's Orbo Electromagnetic Interaction COP is greater than 1:

    watch?v=bSftoc9Pm1U

  • No.

  • Denial.

  • watch?v=VYGSdUdONpw

  • Why?

  • Test the science to see how it can be achieved.

  • It can't be achieved, silly: magic is impossible.

  • who winds a grandfather clock? dont they operate on pendulum system?

  • The physics work dumb ass

  • This vid deserves 5*

  • it is called an electron sheer vortex with an element drawback.

  • If you are pro-Telsa then stop associating Telsa's name with "free energy" and "overunity" garbage.

    Telsa knew the laws of Thermodynamics and lived by them. Lutec is a con industry that is sucking money from people for ten years and only producing videos to promote investment. They won't answer theri phone or emails since 2001.

  • @finjegroup Stop defacing Telsa' name. This is not what he was attempting.

    There is free energy out there and it costs lots of money to convert it to a useful form.

    I see you have been successful.

  • it works cold fusion, yeah right.

  • Tesla dies before I was born, shit-for-brains.

  • It's not a hard concept to follow. The device uses the electromagnetic energy stored in it's magnets. Lutec do not claim this device to be perpetual, it doesn't defy the laws of physics!!!,it is possible. This should make sense to even an uneducated person, I don't understand why you people have to try and dismiss it. They have just thought outside the box, if more people did that instead of bitching about it, we'd have our climate change solutions well underway.

  • There is no such thing as "electromagnetic energy," and magnets don't "store energy:" they convert one form of energy into other forms of energy. The devices is a fraud, and the sellers are crooks and they should be in prison.

  • You talk a good talk mate, but you don't have a clue really do you?

    Magnets DO store energy, any primary school kid would know that. You are one seriously jealous Aussie..bitter because you couldn't conceive of anything truly monumental are you?

    I'd suggest throwing away your big oil sponsored physics text books, and get your hands dirty, and try these experiments for yourself...no? Won't try? Can't try? Don't have the vision or imagination?...best get back to whining about others then eh?

  • @spikeychops sorry. Magnets do not and cannot store energy. Magnet donot and cannot produce energy.

    Magnets posses a force.

    Magnet can convert energy to another useable form. They can convert motion energy to electrical energy but never make energy.

    It has to come from somewhere. Go back to grade seven and listen this time

  • Don't be sorry mate..just realise you're wrong.

    Well..strictly speaking you're both right AND wrong (it IS a quantum universe after all!

    They teach each and every one of us the same things, and yes, what they teach works and has worked since the first circuit was designed..however, what they DON'T tell you, and actually actively discourage, is that there are alternate methodologies and processes that are not only more efficient, with the correct setup, can be OU. TPTB love money more than life.

  • When you create your machine that works and creates energy from nowhere, come back and tell us all.

    Until then, go back to grade seven science classs and listen. then bite me.

  • I will, and i would..if i knew what a 'classs' was. Perhaps you would do well to take your own advice to return to study.

  • And strictly speaking, the energy doesn't come from 'nowhere'. That would be silly/improbable. Frankly, the energy placed within the magnet when it was magnetized, causes the 'magnetic moments' within the material to align and become 'receptive' to radiant energy induction. How this is achieved..i don't know. The point is, the magnets don't produce excess energy, they are a type of conduit or conductor that can interface and accept radiant/ether/ZPE. The trouble is in implementation and design

  • Comment removed

  • You are one serious fucking wanker.

    I'd ask you to address my comment and give an adult answer, but i suspect this would be impossible for you to do, as you seems to posses the mind of a mentally impaired child.

    I have a loving family, a nice comfortable home, money in the bank, healthy, world traveller..what exactly qualifies me as a loser then dicksplash? You know nothing about me or my life, even my sex, yet you say shit like that?! Proves you're a tosspot fuckwit of the highest order.

  • ROFLMFAO....Loser

  • Sure these "Lutec" guys are full of it. Leave out the F-bombs from your vid though. Gotta keep it clean to set a good example for the kiddies. Hey - If I wind grandfather clocks all day will I lose weight? JK - :-) Lutec reminds me of the old Stanley Myers videos on hydrogen fuel. Any thoughts on palladium catalyzed electrolysis and sono-cavitation?

  • Lutec sounds close to Lunatic.

  • ALSO anyone who speaks seriously of green house gasses and carbon footprint, is an idiot depending on coerced / selfishly motivated conclusions by those who respected as scientists, undeserved. Those are hacks that have no clue beyond what they are fed, and are to lazy to get beyond it.

    Carbon levels put out by man and Methane levels put out by our activities are infinitesimal compared to natures output. Lies pushing it should clue us in. It's a profit/power motivated sham Al Gore=$100,000,000s

  • You may be a fucking crazy raving moron, but I'll agree with this.

    War Machine is unpopular, so they decide to get themselves a common world enemy. In this case, the environment. Something that effects all of us. Then, through scare tactics, propaganda, and appealing to fucking hippie brainless (not to mention showerless) fucks, they can find a new source of revenue and shut down the war machine.

  • Showerless Hippies?

    Should be praising them then...for not using up resources, water and heat saved..helps to save the environment a little. Good for them.

  • No.

    Man.

    No.

    You're an idiot. :/

    The environment isn't in any danger from us.

    We are in danger from it.

  • If you look more closely at their claims, they do claim that the devise will run on it's own power. That does make sense, because if it wouldn't then it just wouldn't work, but they do claim that so there is no impeaching scientific law that proves it impossible.

    The pushing and pulling force of the magnets isn't exactly something from nothing, it's an energy source just as nuclear energy or combustion power is, without the heat / expansion. I doubt seriously if magnets maintain mag. forever.

  • It's nothing like Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Power is the fission of the nucleus. Magnets have wide electron orbits that, when an object with a valence electron gets close enough, creates a valence bond. The force experienced and the dimensional observation is a coming together of the two objects.

    See what I'm sayin'?

    And yes, all magnets lose magnetism over time.

  • The kinetic energy=physical weight thing? One of the most idiotic misinterpretations of law that I've seen. Unfortunately that level of stupid by cause and effect retarded "educated" products of our "advanced" educational system are all to common. Ever wonder why most professors are morons who couldn't hold a normal job? Let alone do anything productive? They are immersed in disconnected "knowledge" without corresponding catalysts

    Inventors often prove them wrong with groundbreaking innovations

  • Drunk Science? Anyway you're a dick, though I'm not sure you are wrong.

    I have one for you, take all you learned in college, drink and feel like you gained all the knowledge in the universe and take a large dump on your floor (it will just save you from doing it in your skivies anyway) then wait and burn that. You will notice that you didn't burn all the fuel in your food. Now, I know you will say that doesn't mean shit, but it literally does

    Knowledge&Pretension+closed mind=NADA NOTHING NEW

  • There are things in food that your body cannot process.

    That's why you have the ability to void your body of these things.

    So what does that prove?

  • oh also the clock doesnt get heavier fool. have you ever heard of potential and kinetic enrgy?

  • stop ruining science you pessimistic fuck. why are you being an ignorant cynic? why are you trying to make these people look like fools? Less intelligent people now believe your ramblings and hate this new technology. give it a fucking go and stop doing a disservice to humanity. please.