because it collapsed in the same day, it takes weeks to plan something like that... not to mention the whole area was a crime scene, and they destroyed the evidence before anyone truly. knew what happened.
Look at 4:32 - Danny Jovenko is being shown the same truncated verson of the collapse video thats become a staple on the 'truther' videos here on u-tube. No wonder he thinks it was demolition.
Watch at 0:58 - a large Eng Mezzanine on the left, which took about 30% of the roof area, falls into the bldg 6 - 7 seconds prior to rest of the collapse.
The NIST report simullation confirms this localized collapse took out enough of the core to become unstoppable.
I love the 'examples' of other fallen bldgs @ 2:35 - all small 9-12 story masonary bldgs toppled by an earthquake in Mexico. Wow this is 'journalism' at its best. Or yellowest anyway.
my senator mitch mcconnell voted yes bailout and he has lost my VOTE here everyone else needs to do the same find out who your congressman and senators are and vote them out get a sign for who is running agianst them put it in your yard and lets vote these crooks out of office and dont forget OBAMA / MCCAIN WHO BOTH VOTED FOR IT ( VOTE THIRD PARTY)(VOTE NADER)
They did not use det cord btw. They used Thermite or Thermate. The core of the building burned for days under very hot degree temperatures much like a volcano. The gold stored in the basement was supposedly lost but it was actually stolen. Just like the 2.3 Trillion dollars lost by the Pentegon. There is an actual Youtube video about that too. America is under control of the 4th Reich. Help us people of the world. HELP US!
How stupid did Bush & Cheney think were the American People? They will hang. Bush is currently trying to pardon himself for future treasonous and war crimes. How guilty do you all think he is?
Since WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed at nearly "free fall speed," unless you are a "delusional nutcase" or a "high school physics-ignorant retard," and think steel-reinforced concrete has the same resistance capacity as "AIR", there is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that all three buildings were imploded.
erad, those half assed comparisons is what the controlled demolition expert Danny Jawenko used to definitively ascertain that it was controlled demolition. He saw the same video clips we saw, you know, the same ones used in those half assed comparisons. That was his basis just by looking at the videos and the way the building fell. He did not use his calculator or math equations. He used his eyes just like we do. If it walks like a duck... well you know the rest.
While u r just another guy, nothing in ur head, not stupid but just another person, his a demolition expert, and one of few to be more precise IN THE WORLD, he can estimate it just by looking, he knows every single procedure that should be done for such an operation, so I believe him (who has NO GAIN, NO INTEREST from this) then u or Bush and his team, who have ALL to gain.
you got me there, I have A Lot riding on this whole conspiracy being swallowed. I mean there's the movie deal, the book, the institutions I've been establishing, the government that I run and make shitloads of money from, etc. Stop getting in my way, dammit. And darn that world-renowned Danny Jawenko, if it weren't for him, and you meddlin' kids-I'd have gotten away with it
again, "...if they want their argument to stick-USE FOOTAGE OF IDENTICAL SITUATIONS...ie. 2 1000ft+ buildings, built in the late 60's/early70's, that have been hit with jetliners, yet subsequently remained standing...Far as I know, that hasn't happened; let alone been reproduced in a lab." Oh, and there ARE plenty of eyewitnesses who concur with the original and historic facts of planes hitting and destroying those buildings that I agree with. 'Clean slate', that sounds alot like 'brainwash'
Yes i c ur point, thanks for talking, and believe what u want. But I can give u evidence: the other WTC towers were destroyed in that same way, and they still stick up high, but the WTC7 went down when u counld SEE CLEARLY that it had VERY LITTLE damage compared to the other WTC buildings destroyed by the debris of the main towers. I know a lot of ppl like u, their not bothered by knowing the truth, they just swallow what they c on TV and listen stupidly to any gvt official.
because there haven't been any crashes like that. the WTCs were tallest buildings at the time. there were no buildings that tall, and there have only ever been a handful of plane crashes into skyscrapers (usually accidental). and the buildings were recreated in a lab by making a few stories of the WTC frame and adding the proper weight onto it, and recreating the fires, and they didn't come near falling. it was in loose change.
Listen to the testimonies. The building was BROUGHT DOWN, i.e. controlled demolition. What part of that do you not understand? If you don't want to believe the witnesses, then that is your choice. But that means you are calling them liars and they are making up their stories. Do they look like they are being paid for their interviews? What do they stand to gain by coming forward? Just accept the truth and move on rather than continue believing a lie.
erad, just accept the truth. I know it's hard, but after you do then you can move on with your life. The CD expert said he could not explain how the building could be rigged the same day. But it WASN'T. It was rigged in advance. Like most of us we were told lies right from the beginning. Then we start with those lies and try to make sense of things. That's when we run into contradictions and things that cannot be explained. If you start with a clean slate, then it all makes sense.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
or let me be more succinct, if someone wants to establish that 'it couldn't have been those planes (or, just the planes)that caused all of that damage/catastrophy', and if they want their argument to stick-USE FOOTAGE OF IDENTICAL SITUATIONS...ie. 2 1000ft+ buildings, built in the late 60's/early70's, that have been hit with jetliners, yet subsequently remained standing...Far as I know, that hasn't happened; let alone been reproduced in a lab.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what I'm saying is that half-assed comparisons are not adequate in establishing nefarious governmental conspiracies, unless you're an idiot...then whatever you want to believe, you can 'read' into things like video comparisons played with cooky music and printed statements scrolling across the screen that guide you along by the hand and tell you what you're seeing and how to interpret it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Then again, all of those fantastic side by side comparison videos sure made an expert of me in 6:48. I'm sure there's no variation btween structure, circumstances, environment, or any other outside elements like those silly plane impacts or the collapse of larger, neighboring structures.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Um, okay-so the only 'expert' shown to testify said, that in his estimation it looked like a controlled implosion, but then could not explain how this could be achieved given the circumstances (fire, short amount of time, etc)...so this is your 'proof'? Likewise, this is what conspiracy theorists are relying upon as proof of a cover up to support their network o' arguments? Good luck with that...it's clearly a flawless approach.
Probably among the best short WTC7 documentaries around.
If anyone has a link for that documentary at the end with the demolition expert showing his surprise, in it's entirety and with English subtitles, please PM me with the link. A name for the documentary would also be welcome if you don't have a link. Thankyou.
911 was nothing more than a military sacrifice.. like sending 20,000 troops to their death in a big battle.. people on the front lines are all dead. Military Industrial Complex ran a game on us..
Monkey Bush and his friends killed 3000 of their own people only for having an excuse for the invasion of Afganistan and Irak, only for owning the petrol. That's the only truth.
All that say the contrary just don't see, or simply are trying to hide the truth, so usa imagen don't be damaged.
Monkey Bush and his friends should be joudged in an international court for crimes against humanity! You all usa citizens work only for the corporations of these people. Wake up.
6 people are rational thinkers.
CecilyHeron 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Danny Jovenko is now dead;died in a car crash,circumstances were suspicious.
Investigation still not concluded....(explosives expert at 4.32)
parannoyance 4 months ago
Danny Jovenko is now dead;died in a car crash,circumstances were suspicious.
Investigation still not concluded....(explosives expert at 4.32)
parannoyance 4 months ago
to many questions hang over this event. something is shady about this.
4246theone 8 months ago
I always knew... Now you got to recognize the conspiracy...
SmokieMcWeed 2 years ago 3
Why wouldn't they just admit a controlled demolition? They do it after earthquakes! I don't understand the secrecy.
thomo74 2 years ago 2
because it collapsed in the same day, it takes weeks to plan something like that... not to mention the whole area was a crime scene, and they destroyed the evidence before anyone truly. knew what happened.
9/11 was an inside job handsdown
HabitualEcstasy 2 years ago 3
Look at 4:32 - Danny Jovenko is being shown the same truncated verson of the collapse video thats become a staple on the 'truther' videos here on u-tube. No wonder he thinks it was demolition.
Watch at 0:58 - a large Eng Mezzanine on the left, which took about 30% of the roof area, falls into the bldg 6 - 7 seconds prior to rest of the collapse.
The NIST report simullation confirms this localized collapse took out enough of the core to become unstoppable.
It shoots 'free fall' down.
Manelvagorio 2 years ago
I love the 'examples' of other fallen bldgs @ 2:35 - all small 9-12 story masonary bldgs toppled by an earthquake in Mexico. Wow this is 'journalism' at its best. Or yellowest anyway.
Manelvagorio 2 years ago
the isrAELI ZIO IISTS CONTROL ALL
moynul123 3 years ago 8
Levels 14-17 listed as vacant? Hmmmmmmm
pogostixx 3 years ago 4
@primoabruzzi
sorry to burst your bubble, my friend, but democrats were in on it too. on both sides of
the ocean.
911reset 3 years ago 8
911 reset...you are absolutely correct
primoabruzzi 2 years ago
republimaggots insist on two things.
1. Believing that WTC was done by muslims, and their right to hammer anyone who believe different.
2. Sending non chickenhawks to war for no intelligent reason
primoabruzzi 3 years ago 4
PrometheusWithLight
TruthLogic 2 years ago
Wow.
tovarco 3 years ago
my senator mitch mcconnell voted yes bailout and he has lost my VOTE here everyone else needs to do the same find out who your congressman and senators are and vote them out get a sign for who is running agianst them put it in your yard and lets vote these crooks out of office and dont forget OBAMA / MCCAIN WHO BOTH VOTED FOR IT ( VOTE THIRD PARTY)(VOTE NADER)
rumpelstillskin65 3 years ago
$
oil
aipac
neocons
art students
moving company
DANCE
ryanshaunkelly 3 years ago 3
rush would not approve
krevice 3 years ago
They did not use det cord btw. They used Thermite or Thermate. The core of the building burned for days under very hot degree temperatures much like a volcano. The gold stored in the basement was supposedly lost but it was actually stolen. Just like the 2.3 Trillion dollars lost by the Pentegon. There is an actual Youtube video about that too. America is under control of the 4th Reich. Help us people of the world. HELP US!
ResearchX 3 years ago 2
How stupid did Bush & Cheney think were the American People? They will hang. Bush is currently trying to pardon himself for future treasonous and war crimes. How guilty do you all think he is?
ResearchX 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Since WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed at nearly "free fall speed," unless you are a "delusional nutcase" or a "high school physics-ignorant retard," and think steel-reinforced concrete has the same resistance capacity as "AIR", there is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that all three buildings were imploded.
Wake up America!
911thegreathoax 3 years ago
thanks :)
tfhl
Tinfoilhatlady 3 years ago
Excellent. You deserve a Congressional Medal of Honor (or something like that) for these two vids.
betsymetz 3 years ago 5
Anything but the "Medal of Freedom", thats reserved for the lackeys.
motonegros 3 years ago 3
erad, those half assed comparisons is what the controlled demolition expert Danny Jawenko used to definitively ascertain that it was controlled demolition. He saw the same video clips we saw, you know, the same ones used in those half assed comparisons. That was his basis just by looking at the videos and the way the building fell. He did not use his calculator or math equations. He used his eyes just like we do. If it walks like a duck... well you know the rest.
felicity5150 3 years ago 2
While u r just another guy, nothing in ur head, not stupid but just another person, his a demolition expert, and one of few to be more precise IN THE WORLD, he can estimate it just by looking, he knows every single procedure that should be done for such an operation, so I believe him (who has NO GAIN, NO INTEREST from this) then u or Bush and his team, who have ALL to gain.
cyberJamilonc 3 years ago
you got me there, I have A Lot riding on this whole conspiracy being swallowed. I mean there's the movie deal, the book, the institutions I've been establishing, the government that I run and make shitloads of money from, etc. Stop getting in my way, dammit. And darn that world-renowned Danny Jawenko, if it weren't for him, and you meddlin' kids-I'd have gotten away with it
erad68315 3 years ago
again, "...if they want their argument to stick-USE FOOTAGE OF IDENTICAL SITUATIONS...ie. 2 1000ft+ buildings, built in the late 60's/early70's, that have been hit with jetliners, yet subsequently remained standing...Far as I know, that hasn't happened; let alone been reproduced in a lab." Oh, and there ARE plenty of eyewitnesses who concur with the original and historic facts of planes hitting and destroying those buildings that I agree with. 'Clean slate', that sounds alot like 'brainwash'
erad68315 3 years ago
Yes i c ur point, thanks for talking, and believe what u want. But I can give u evidence: the other WTC towers were destroyed in that same way, and they still stick up high, but the WTC7 went down when u counld SEE CLEARLY that it had VERY LITTLE damage compared to the other WTC buildings destroyed by the debris of the main towers. I know a lot of ppl like u, their not bothered by knowing the truth, they just swallow what they c on TV and listen stupidly to any gvt official.
cyberJamilonc 3 years ago 3
we can't all be geniuses who get our poorly packaged conspiracies off youtube
erad68315 3 years ago
whatever u say.
cyberJamilonc 3 years ago
oh yeah, well la-ti-DA!
erad68315 3 years ago
because there haven't been any crashes like that. the WTCs were tallest buildings at the time. there were no buildings that tall, and there have only ever been a handful of plane crashes into skyscrapers (usually accidental). and the buildings were recreated in a lab by making a few stories of the WTC frame and adding the proper weight onto it, and recreating the fires, and they didn't come near falling. it was in loose change.
prqd112 3 years ago
Listen to the testimonies. The building was BROUGHT DOWN, i.e. controlled demolition. What part of that do you not understand? If you don't want to believe the witnesses, then that is your choice. But that means you are calling them liars and they are making up their stories. Do they look like they are being paid for their interviews? What do they stand to gain by coming forward? Just accept the truth and move on rather than continue believing a lie.
felicity5150 3 years ago 4
erad, just accept the truth. I know it's hard, but after you do then you can move on with your life. The CD expert said he could not explain how the building could be rigged the same day. But it WASN'T. It was rigged in advance. Like most of us we were told lies right from the beginning. Then we start with those lies and try to make sense of things. That's when we run into contradictions and things that cannot be explained. If you start with a clean slate, then it all makes sense.
felicity5150 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
or let me be more succinct, if someone wants to establish that 'it couldn't have been those planes (or, just the planes)that caused all of that damage/catastrophy', and if they want their argument to stick-USE FOOTAGE OF IDENTICAL SITUATIONS...ie. 2 1000ft+ buildings, built in the late 60's/early70's, that have been hit with jetliners, yet subsequently remained standing...Far as I know, that hasn't happened; let alone been reproduced in a lab.
erad68315 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what I'm saying is that half-assed comparisons are not adequate in establishing nefarious governmental conspiracies, unless you're an idiot...then whatever you want to believe, you can 'read' into things like video comparisons played with cooky music and printed statements scrolling across the screen that guide you along by the hand and tell you what you're seeing and how to interpret it.
erad68315 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Then again, all of those fantastic side by side comparison videos sure made an expert of me in 6:48. I'm sure there's no variation btween structure, circumstances, environment, or any other outside elements like those silly plane impacts or the collapse of larger, neighboring structures.
erad68315 3 years ago
I envy ur ignorance.
cyberJamilonc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Um, okay-so the only 'expert' shown to testify said, that in his estimation it looked like a controlled implosion, but then could not explain how this could be achieved given the circumstances (fire, short amount of time, etc)...so this is your 'proof'? Likewise, this is what conspiracy theorists are relying upon as proof of a cover up to support their network o' arguments? Good luck with that...it's clearly a flawless approach.
erad68315 3 years ago
What the hell are you even saying?
SeiferothX 3 years ago 5
Probably among the best short WTC7 documentaries around.
If anyone has a link for that documentary at the end with the demolition expert showing his surprise, in it's entirety and with English subtitles, please PM me with the link. A name for the documentary would also be welcome if you don't have a link. Thankyou.
crazymoo56 3 years ago 2
911 was nothing more than a military sacrifice.. like sending 20,000 troops to their death in a big battle.. people on the front lines are all dead. Military Industrial Complex ran a game on us..
jerbear420 3 years ago 5
I would say the evidence is most supportive of your / my position !!!
notrustbbc 3 years ago 2
I think bush is a murderer but wendys burgers are the dogs bollocks.
RayFinkle88 4 years ago 4
ahahaha, pure gold
K1NGF3DOR 4 years ago
Monkey Bush and his friends killed 3000 of their own people only for having an excuse for the invasion of Afganistan and Irak, only for owning the petrol. That's the only truth.
All that say the contrary just don't see, or simply are trying to hide the truth, so usa imagen don't be damaged.
Monkey Bush and his friends should be joudged in an international court for crimes against humanity! You all usa citizens work only for the corporations of these people. Wake up.
jesudel 4 years ago 5
we need to keep truckin on this till the truth is forced out. They will try to get Gouliani elected to keep the truth from ever coming out.
gondor124 4 years ago
Inside job, a cancer within the government, so sad!
wildnutria 4 years ago 5
good job
GawdMachine 4 years ago
wtc7 + bcc script = inside job
Garbonzo07 4 years ago 5
Nice job :)
Doe zo voort! :)
silven456 4 years ago 4