it must be nice to be at the place where you can see the bible as stories
I can see some of then as stories....still have hell fire and brimstone indoctrinated in my bones/veins
Samson and Delilah = strength is in hair not in muscle...no need for protein shakes and gym workouts, just grow your hair out ya hippie metal heads; and you'll be as strong as an ox
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
jacob,
AFTER you become a NEW CREATION in Christ, God will teach you.
Then you'll quit making Christians your excuse.
Peter, seeing him, says to Jesus, Lord, and what [of] this [man]? Jesus says to him, If I will that he abide until I come, what [is that] to thee? Follow thou me. (Joh 21:21-22)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Of all the complex sins people find themselves chained to, spinning up false fronts.
..Robert fell for the first one..
"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" (Ge 3:1)
AFTER you become a NEW CREATION in Christ, beginning Bible commentary will be on the horizon.
The Bible is always infallible.
Of course, defiant sinners can't stand that.
"All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" (2Ti 3:16)
My Bible doesn't make any reference whatsoever to Jesus. If I were to take the same tack as you did with the Qu'uran, then I could just dismiss anything that came after it as poorly-conceived sequels & unauthoritative commentary. It's just as valid.
@xxGLhrMxx well the Qur’an and bible take both their testaments from the same text that the torah also uses so it's not a stretch saying you can prove either. I find the archaeological and historical information even more amazing than the bible text. In the 1980's a man tried to prove sound from horns could not destroy a brick wall, he failed and proved that the same decibel sound as would have been used at Jericho could not only destroy an ancient wall but modern ones as well.
so i take it that you don't believe that god is all powerfull
"...The LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." -- Judges 1:19
"could not", a impossibility for a god who is saposed to be omnipotent, yet the bible is infallible so the bible proves that god is not omnipotent.
Philosophers, on their deathbeds want REAL answers. They know that goofy, syllogism puzzle arguments don't get it.
"And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day." (Joh 6:40)
Luckily John added a couple blatant heaven references, as he was the last Gospel written. Each author, especially John, had different take on what jesus' effect would be. Mark, first gospel, says Jesus will return to earth to create His "kingdom" before some of the apostles die. When John wrote his gospel all the apostles were dead and Jesus hadn't come back. So John re-invents the "kingdom of God". And nothing similar to your quote can be found in the three earlier synoptic Gospels.
You said: "God inspired and providentially preserved His Word perfect in the Bible via HIS promises. It is thus sacred, infalible, and final authority." That's an assertion without proof. Read "Misquoting Jesus" and "Jesus Interrupted" for a fair treatment of the subject.
You also said: "You're all tangled up in the captivity to unbelief common among unsaved, fallen sinners." In my experience with "Christians," the loudest ones have diagnosed mental problems and are two-faced.
no offence, but are you fgor real? the bible is full of contradictions and interpolations, written into it up to the 10th century. there are more translation mistakes made in all translations of the nt than there are words in the nt. this is undisputed fact. the greek translation of some of jesus' quotes only make literal sense (using unique greek double entendres) in greek, and since he spoke in aramaich, he could not have said these things. study the bible before you swallow it whole please.
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." (Ga 2:20)
trac4yt- than can you explain why we use the masoretic text for the old, and the nt writer only quoted the septuigint. These 2 texts are very different. And we have no originals. So which one is right?
By your reasoning, we should also toss out all of the Levitical scholars, Rabbinic priests, and scribes of the Judaic law because the dispensation of the Holy Spirit had not yet occurred.
Obviously, their scriptural reasoning was equally "N/A".
Perhaps you should reword "get saved" to "remove reasoning, hermeneutics and deduction."
Just let the Spirit guide you, eh? The same one that apparently divided Paul and Peter? (Gal. 2)
I don't get it how can you be a Christian Atheist
I've looked at the Wiki page for the term
but if you're an atheist surely that means you don't believe in Jesus? :/
leeperryismerry 1 year ago
it must be nice to be at the place where you can see the bible as stories
I can see some of then as stories....still have hell fire and brimstone indoctrinated in my bones/veins
Samson and Delilah = strength is in hair not in muscle...no need for protein shakes and gym workouts, just grow your hair out ya hippie metal heads; and you'll be as strong as an ox
numbersabcdefg 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jacob,
AFTER you become a NEW CREATION in Christ, God will teach you.
Then you'll quit making Christians your excuse.
Peter, seeing him, says to Jesus, Lord, and what [of] this [man]? Jesus says to him, If I will that he abide until I come, what [is that] to thee? Follow thou me. (Joh 21:21-22)
:-)
AND you'll have eternal joy and peace.
Time to get on the glory train.
trac4yt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jacob,
Bart E.'s work was never needed.
He's still wondering whether he's a chemical-onlyite.
"Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith." (2Ti 3:8)
:-)
But, he's young.
He still may repent.
trac4yt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jacob,
God doesn't need clip-boarded, fallen-sinner, non-omnsicient historians to confirm His Word..
...nor high priests..
"Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness." (Lu 3:2)
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Of all the complex sins people find themselves chained to, spinning up false fronts.
..Robert fell for the first one..
"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?" (Ge 3:1)
BUT, there's always hope in Jesus Christ.
Why end life as an apostate?
:-O
trac4yt 2 years ago
That OLD, TIRED, ABSURD, and COMPLETELY DEBUNKED argument is all you've got?
If someone dares speak logic, and you have no answer whatsoever, OH, they're of the DEVIL and DON'T LISTEN, because the devil is too fucking clever.
That's like a wildcard to use to dismiss ANY fact that a christian finds disagreeable to his sick and wicket dogma.
You're not going to save anyone here.
Why don't you go SHOVE JESUS UP YOUR -OWN- ASS instead of trying to shove that nasty, angry fuckball up my ass.
hostingdude 2 years ago 2
mrpayn,
God revealed HIS Word in HIS time and way using HIS servants.
He doesn't need the permission of clipboarded, limitation-loaded, non-omniscient, fallen sinners to o.k. His purposes..
..nor high priests..
"Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness." (Lu 3:2)
Receive Christ.
Walk with Him.
Why not be on the winning side for a change?
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
@trac4yt if ignorance is bliss you must be one happy mofo
basenz 2 years ago
theevo,
AFTER you become a NEW CREATION in Christ, beginning Bible commentary will be on the horizon.
The Bible is always infallible.
Of course, defiant sinners can't stand that.
"All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" (2Ti 3:16)
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
roba,
You don't have a Bible.
:-0
"And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself." (Lu 24:27)
Get yourself an infallible one..
bibleprotector . com
:-)
Receive Christ.
A full pardon is available.
trac4yt 2 years ago
trac4yt -
My Bible doesn't make any reference whatsoever to Jesus. If I were to take the same tack as you did with the Qu'uran, then I could just dismiss anything that came after it as poorly-conceived sequels & unauthoritative commentary. It's just as valid.
robaronin 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
xxgl,
Any so called "spiritual teaching" contradicting the infallible Bible is counterfeit.
The Bible is THE final authority on the Person, Life and Work of Jesus Christ.
The qur'an is not.
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
meta,
The Bible is always infallible.
The defiant simply can't stand the victory at Calvary and prefer that sin goes on and on.
But, as in the days of Noah, God will interrupt.
"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." (Mt 7:15)
:-O
Thus, seek shelter in Jesus Christ.
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
You cite a text inside the bible to prove the bible is the truth?
_
I could do that with the Vedas, the Qu'ran, and many others, dude.
xxGLhrMxx 2 years ago 3
@xxGLhrMxx well the Qur’an and bible take both their testaments from the same text that the torah also uses so it's not a stretch saying you can prove either. I find the archaeological and historical information even more amazing than the bible text. In the 1980's a man tried to prove sound from horns could not destroy a brick wall, he failed and proved that the same decibel sound as would have been used at Jericho could not only destroy an ancient wall but modern ones as well.
ckilr01 1 year ago
so i take it that you don't believe that god is all powerfull
"...The LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." -- Judges 1:19
"could not", a impossibility for a god who is saposed to be omnipotent, yet the bible is infallible so the bible proves that god is not omnipotent.
TheEvolver311 2 years ago
sh0,
Philosophers, on their deathbeds want REAL answers. They know that goofy, syllogism puzzle arguments don't get it.
"And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day." (Joh 6:40)
:-)
trac4yt 2 years ago
Luckily John added a couple blatant heaven references, as he was the last Gospel written. Each author, especially John, had different take on what jesus' effect would be. Mark, first gospel, says Jesus will return to earth to create His "kingdom" before some of the apostles die. When John wrote his gospel all the apostles were dead and Jesus hadn't come back. So John re-invents the "kingdom of God". And nothing similar to your quote can be found in the three earlier synoptic Gospels.
mrpayne123 2 years ago 2
ComCodex where did you get this audio? Thanks for posting it!
AgentAgnostic 2 years ago
A clip from Bob's Bible Geek internet radio show. I think he still produces them. Check his website.
ComCodex 2 years ago
Bibles are all a joke right? lets focus on the fact that humans should be past this by now why cant you just worship this planet?
metalyssa 3 years ago
johnn,
God inspired and providentially preserved His Word perfect in the Bible via HIS promises. It is thus sacred, infalible, and final authority.
You're all tangled up in the captivity to unbelief common among unsaved, fallen sinners.
All is God-centric..
..not fallen-sinner centric.
Never doubt the Word of God.
Jesus Christ would teach you likewise.
:-)
trac4yt 3 years ago
Your arguments are weak and your mind is weaker.
Sh0nin 2 years ago 3
You said: "God inspired and providentially preserved His Word perfect in the Bible via HIS promises. It is thus sacred, infalible, and final authority." That's an assertion without proof. Read "Misquoting Jesus" and "Jesus Interrupted" for a fair treatment of the subject.
You also said: "You're all tangled up in the captivity to unbelief common among unsaved, fallen sinners." In my experience with "Christians," the loudest ones have diagnosed mental problems and are two-faced.
jacoblandes 2 years ago
ptica,
Oh, not at all.
I ALREADY HAVE everlasting life..
...guaranteed IN CHRIST.
But YOU need to hear the Gospel also.
You'll never be the same.
Your life will take on eternal significance.
:-)
trac4yt 3 years ago
no offence, but are you fgor real? the bible is full of contradictions and interpolations, written into it up to the 10th century. there are more translation mistakes made in all translations of the nt than there are words in the nt. this is undisputed fact. the greek translation of some of jesus' quotes only make literal sense (using unique greek double entendres) in greek, and since he spoke in aramaich, he could not have said these things. study the bible before you swallow it whole please.
johnnyp76 3 years ago
bsint,
Just read your Bible and never doubt it.
If fact, download an infallible one for yourself..
bibleprotector . com
:-)
trac4yt 3 years ago
comdex,
The NT is the OT revealed.
The OT is the NT concealed.
God reveals HIS ways in HIS times.
Christ never doubted.
Thus, HIS faith..
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." (Ga 2:20)
:-)
trac4yt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You Tube is for video. Not boring doctors who badly tell great stories in a whiny sarcastic voice. Booooring.
wesleyscottdevries 3 years ago
Video's overrated.
ComCodex 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bsint,
It is the Holy Spirit's prerogative to quote and modify and/or expand upon OT Words, in the NT.
God inspired and providentially preserved His Word perfect according to HIS promises.
The original autographs are not needed.
Never doubt the Word of God.
Jesus Christ didn't.
And Jesus Christ never taught you to doubt the Word of God.
Doubting God's Word finds its moorings in Hell.
:-0
trac4yt 3 years ago
Modify? Why would the OT need to be modified?
The Bible paints the believer into a corner by making doubt into a sin. Why would Yahweh be offended by honest questions to the book's veracity?
It's the fear of jeopardizing their alleged salvation that can restrict Christians from asking questions. A sad state to be in.
ComCodex 3 years ago 3
trac4yt, that meANS you are enroute to HELL
ptica11 3 years ago
ratio,
Yes, the Holy Spirit will guide you also in HIS authored Book, the Bible...
..after you get saved.
The Bible is always infallible.
And the NT is THE final authority on all OT references found therein...
..Not OT commentators.
trac4yt 3 years ago
trac4yt- than can you explain why we use the masoretic text for the old, and the nt writer only quoted the septuigint. These 2 texts are very different. And we have no originals. So which one is right?
BSintolerant 3 years ago
Dr. Price Kills it everytime
TheAtheistChrist 4 years ago
:-)
trac4yt 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Price needs to get saved someday.
He lacks the indwelling Holy Spirit.
All of his Bible commentary is N/A.
trac4yt 4 years ago
I see we have a theological nimrod on our hands.
By your reasoning, we should also toss out all of the Levitical scholars, Rabbinic priests, and scribes of the Judaic law because the dispensation of the Holy Spirit had not yet occurred.
Obviously, their scriptural reasoning was equally "N/A".
Perhaps you should reword "get saved" to "remove reasoning, hermeneutics and deduction."
Just let the Spirit guide you, eh? The same one that apparently divided Paul and Peter? (Gal. 2)
Brilliance.
rationalmuscle 3 years ago 3
The real miracle is not the story of Jonah, but the fact that modern people are trying to find some morality in this fantasy. Peace !!
Philos2006 4 years ago 2
Amazing Price.
samonedo 4 years ago
Can't hear enough from Dr. Price! So refreshing to listen to a biblical scholar who knows his stuff and is entertaining.
marius404 4 years ago 3
GOTMOREPRICE? LOL Just kidding.... this guy is fascinating!!!!! Five Stars !!!!
SethVincent 4 years ago 2
Thanks. More to come...
ComCodex 4 years ago