Interesting on how only the Japanese seem to care about restoring awsome tanks and keeping them in great shape... We should take all the remaining WW2 tanks and give them to the japanese õ_õ
do you like waffles? yah i like waffles. do you like french toast? yeah i like french toast. do you like pancakes? yah i like pancakes. dgdgdgg WAFFLES!
And to emphasize: I refer to the situations were troops fled their positions AT THE SOUND/sight of a tank.So not being crushed or obliterated by tank assault!!
That happened at the start phase of 1940 Sedan attacks (and boy do the Anglophiles mock the French over that , even today), yet the brits and the yanks did not fare much better in malaya and corregidorin 41 and 42 (hello! more than a year later with even less impressive jap tanks!!).
The Japanese army had great success against the Chinese with a range of very small tanks during the 1930's and got the false impression that is all they would need. The Chinese lacked anti tank guns, any tanks of their own and had virtually no ground attack aircraft. Although the Japanese did develop an aluminum block, air cooled diesel engine for for their later tanks which worked very well even if the tanks that used it weren't the best
crappy as it is, I still don't understand how it was able to push thru Malaya 42 and Philipp 41/42 if it was as crappy by those 42 standards??!?
Oh yes, some Australian/british 2 pdr guns (or 25pdr by that time?) did get to knock a few (!) out in an ambush, yet the Jap army pushed on..surely , by that time they must have known about the infamous molotov cocktail (origin Finland 39!!)..or can we thus assume the brits and yanks were just as scared of the sound of a tank as the french in 40?!
a) Being a "crappy" tank (acc, to comments) it DID function well.
b) and yes, despite 2 pdr antitank guns & antitankrifles & the knowledge of petrolbombs (TWO years of use) ..the japs still raced through outnumbering allied defenses in malaya and philippines..hence >>>> these brits and yank WERE shitting their pants just as the french in Sedan "at the sound of the rattling of a tank" (see Corregidor=fortress & jap tanks ).
Japanese tanks were not designed to kill tanks. They were for infantry support and in much of the Pacific theatre they were effective enough. When faced with a Sherman or a good field piece they were nothing but flimsy targets. I love the American accounts of hitting them with HEAT rounds and having no effect as theround did not hit enough metal to activate. They had to switch to standard HE rounds to destroy them.
@StarscreamLord dude its a world war one tank its supposed to look crappy have you seen the japanese type 10 or type 90 those arent crappy their modern tanks
Cool clip. Japanese armor was pretty weird when you consider that the Japanese had possibly the best fighter planes and Navy at the beginning of the WWII, along with some of the toughest infantrymen, but had such crappy tanks. These tanks don't look much more advanced than WWI tanks. Maybe they didn't care because they knew that tanks didn't mean much in the jungle or against the Chinese who had few, if any tanks to field against them.
@SirEattonHogg I guess they look like ww1 tanks because they started developing them late, but japanese realised the need for good tanks, near the end of the war tanks with big 75 mm guns were made, and wouldve probably improved if the war went on.
@Whatever38458 I didnt say they would catch up to the westerners, just that they did realize its importance and were improving, but behind the rest of the world.
@SirEattonHogg China only had one tank formation which was the Chinese 5th Army which used Soviet T-26 tanks. However when this unit saw action in winter 1939-40 against the élite Japanese 5th Div (later instrumental in the Malay campaign and widely considered the best infantry division in Asia), they won a spectacular victory wiping the 5th Div's best two Regiments the (21st and 42nd, comprising the 21st Brigade).
some how remainds me soviet t 28 but still amazed to see japanese tank that acutaly works
Nikitos253 1 month ago
Interesting on how only the Japanese seem to care about restoring awsome tanks and keeping them in great shape... We should take all the remaining WW2 tanks and give them to the japanese õ_õ
WorstCommenter2008 4 months ago
do you like waffles? yah i like waffles. do you like french toast? yeah i like french toast. do you like pancakes? yah i like pancakes. dgdgdgg WAFFLES!
MrSpy3000 5 months ago
Das war schrecklich
takashi806 7 months ago
And to emphasize: I refer to the situations were troops fled their positions AT THE SOUND/sight of a tank.So not being crushed or obliterated by tank assault!!
That happened at the start phase of 1940 Sedan attacks (and boy do the Anglophiles mock the French over that , even today), yet the brits and the yanks did not fare much better in malaya and corregidorin 41 and 42 (hello! more than a year later with even less impressive jap tanks!!).
Go figure.
The victors write the history books.
oddballsok 8 months ago
Cool.
askjiir 8 months ago
man shes a beast
mtw56or 9 months ago
The Japanese army had great success against the Chinese with a range of very small tanks during the 1930's and got the false impression that is all they would need. The Chinese lacked anti tank guns, any tanks of their own and had virtually no ground attack aircraft. Although the Japanese did develop an aluminum block, air cooled diesel engine for for their later tanks which worked very well even if the tanks that used it weren't the best
binaway 9 months ago
crappy as it is, I still don't understand how it was able to push thru Malaya 42 and Philipp 41/42 if it was as crappy by those 42 standards??!?
Oh yes, some Australian/british 2 pdr guns (or 25pdr by that time?) did get to knock a few (!) out in an ambush, yet the Jap army pushed on..surely , by that time they must have known about the infamous molotov cocktail (origin Finland 39!!)..or can we thus assume the brits and yanks were just as scared of the sound of a tank as the french in 40?!
oddballsok 9 months ago
@oddballsok if all you had is a rifle, what would you do against it? tell it it sucked?
DJonX7 8 months ago
@DJonX7
My text actually concurs with your thought(s)..
a) Being a "crappy" tank (acc, to comments) it DID function well.
b) and yes, despite 2 pdr antitank guns & antitankrifles & the knowledge of petrolbombs (TWO years of use) ..the japs still raced through outnumbering allied defenses in malaya and philippines..hence >>>> these brits and yank WERE shitting their pants just as the french in Sedan "at the sound of the rattling of a tank" (see Corregidor=fortress & jap tanks ).
oddballsok 8 months ago
@oddballsok oh and this tank was made 12 years before the japanese fought any allies. go figure.
DJonX7 8 months ago
These tanks were flimsy sheet metal.
PoetsLight 10 months ago
Japanese tanks were not designed to kill tanks. They were for infantry support and in much of the Pacific theatre they were effective enough. When faced with a Sherman or a good field piece they were nothing but flimsy targets. I love the American accounts of hitting them with HEAT rounds and having no effect as theround did not hit enough metal to activate. They had to switch to standard HE rounds to destroy them.
guamsst 10 months ago
Sounds like my neighbor's Toyota.
AndrewPPalmer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i would be afraid if that comes after me :D
heisenfeis 1 year ago
It looks crappy. A redneck could build a better tank out of spare bulldozer parts.
StarscreamLord 1 year ago
@StarscreamLord dude its a world war one tank its supposed to look crappy have you seen the japanese type 10 or type 90 those arent crappy their modern tanks
hyperidiot34 1 year ago
@hyperidiot34
actually it is a world war 2 tank.
7sibley7 1 year ago
the front looks like a shell magnet
MakeNine42 1 year ago
Ugly cool!
rwhendrix 1 year ago
a hand grenade could probably take it out from a close distance
dragonsfire2289 1 year ago
Comment removed
motionboy356 1 year ago
I bet if you stand close enough, you can pierce the side armor with a bolt-action rifle.
Grayfox988 1 year ago
Cool clip. Japanese armor was pretty weird when you consider that the Japanese had possibly the best fighter planes and Navy at the beginning of the WWII, along with some of the toughest infantrymen, but had such crappy tanks. These tanks don't look much more advanced than WWI tanks. Maybe they didn't care because they knew that tanks didn't mean much in the jungle or against the Chinese who had few, if any tanks to field against them.
SirEattonHogg 1 year ago
@SirEattonHogg I guess they look like ww1 tanks because they started developing them late, but japanese realised the need for good tanks, near the end of the war tanks with big 75 mm guns were made, and wouldve probably improved if the war went on.
hatemf23 1 year ago
@SirEattonHogg google type 4 and type 5 tanks which was actually intended to be heavier than the sherman.
hatemf23 1 year ago
@hatemf23 by then the British Centurion and Black Prince were ready
Whatever38458 1 year ago
@Whatever38458 I didnt say they would catch up to the westerners, just that they did realize its importance and were improving, but behind the rest of the world.
its like a race
hatemf23 1 year ago
@SirEattonHogg China only had one tank formation which was the Chinese 5th Army which used Soviet T-26 tanks. However when this unit saw action in winter 1939-40 against the élite Japanese 5th Div (later instrumental in the Malay campaign and widely considered the best infantry division in Asia), they won a spectacular victory wiping the 5th Div's best two Regiments the (21st and 42nd, comprising the 21st Brigade).
Whatever38458 1 year ago
@SirEattonHogg Goes to show even the Chinese who had hardly any tanks knew more about armored warfare than the Japanese
Whatever38458 1 year ago
jap tank are worthless shit, i think a m3 half track with AT gun installed would be enough to destroy this piece of shit several times over
NoShame86 2 years ago
@NoShame86 agree totally. In fact thats what the Marines did in the Pacific.
Whatever38458 1 year ago
Whoa great video!
majmambo 2 years ago
niice to see other kinds of wwII armor than American/brittish/russian and german :)
infectedmordn 2 years ago 2
that tank cant kill even cockroaches..that tank is the most weakiest tank that ever build..
wakusabeh 2 years ago
Awesome resto job, thx for uploading it!
britishcalifornia 2 years ago
Haha, it's so tiny.
Zeanu 2 years ago
Any new restoration project, Type 89?
ktc8308 2 years ago
This tank is crudely made even at pe-wwII standard.
fgah 2 years ago
For sure, Japanese tanks were no match for the Shermans.
Zeanu 2 years ago
fantastic!!!... i hope that there are more restorations...
mackoyv 2 years ago
Great renovation! Thanks for sharing!!
bombkiller007 2 years ago