The science argument has decisively been won by the moon hoax proponents, but NASA and their apologists are masters of deception and obfuscation. So much so that they can make utter nonsense appear credible.
So keep it simple and concentrate on exposing NASA's proven lies, such as those relating to the chronology of the two "C-rock" photos. They wouldn't have lied if they had nothing to hide. Just one lie proves that the whole thing was a lie. And we have that proven lie to end this argument.
@katewil24 I think its even worse to be lied to by ignorant conspiracy gluttons. As bad as the gov is, its still more believable than some random dufus whining on a dork webpage
I have a great idea! hows about we take one of those powerful telescopes we use to view into deep space and look at the spot were we were supposed to have landed on the surface of the moon? On a clear night i dont see how that could be a problem. but maybe im wrong and its to simple:/
@Wheedlinglemur Not even hubble space telescope is able to picture the moon with such a high resolution. There are many different calculations about it on the internet, and they're all about 170 metres resolution. It could be possible to picture the lander's shadow when the sun is very low, but this appears to be very tricky, as you need to have a >170m shadow and there is a lot of shadow on the moon.
You could also send an orbiter to have a look at it, but why should NASA do so?
@Wheedlinglemur Actually they arent saying that Nasa didnt go to the moon.. they are saying that they didnt send a man to the moon.. so even if you could see leftovers from the mission it still doesnt prove anything
@Wheedlinglemur the problem is... astronomers are bussy why much very important pieces of work... they have no time to pay atention to conspiracy theorists...
It's fairly easy to see that it was staged. Look at the timing as well. The Russians launched Sputnik; the US had to do something to boost moral. So they staged the moon landing. That's not what concerns me. From this and other events, we know that the government can and will lie to the people. The REAL question is: What else have they lied about?
The computers they had those days were not more advanced than a calulator. You could probably do more with a Commodore 64. It makes doubtful that they went to the moon. The will was there but not the technology.
All the moon landings were faked. I personally think everyone who thinks the moon landings were faked i think we should get together, and try sue nasa !
i can understand the fact that transmitting these images from the moon to earth would cause some distortion. but why not have a hard copy to bring home and show on tv.
The bit on shadows is so elementary i don't know how it even makes it into a video on the conspiracy. It is well know that light reflects OFF surfaces (moons surface) and will then hit and reflect off other surfaces (astronauts, lunar module). Don't beleive me, then go outside at night during a full moon, you will be able to see quite clearly when your eyes adjust. Remember that you can see clearly from the moons light from 400 000 km away, think how bright it would be on the surface.
@Tweekerhead I use to believe this when i was young, I use to defend for Nasa.But sadly the truth is that we didn't land on the moon..Ok, even if we did, why they are not even thinking of going back with technology that we have in this millennium 2011, the Russians,Japanese,Britts are not even thinking of giving it a try..Neil Armstrong knew that future generation will find the truth, that's the reason he gave a cryptic speech with tears at Nasa's Moon landing anniversary..:(
@saggatarian Whenever someone starts by saying"I used to believe",usually means their epistemology is screwed up.
My belief for Apollo is based on facts not emotion.I don't have faith that 12 men walked on the Moon, I've seen the overwhelming evidence.
You sound as if you know Mr. Armstrong the way you talk about his character & motives. You're not from a little town in Ohio where the Armstrong family moved to in 1973 are ya'?
There's not one prohibitive aspect of the Moon landings.
I don't know Armstrong, But i know what 40 billion dollars can do in the 70's ..Alright we landed on the moon, If that's the truth i can accept it heart-fully, But "Only Nasa can land on the moon", hope they will do it again in the future...Cheers..:)
@saggatarian Good to have an open mind, I hope you find some evidence that seals the deal for ya' about Apollo.
Several here on Y-tube have made videos comparing the LRO(Lunar Recon' Orbiter) with the 16mm films that the crews of Apollo have taken from the LM during lunar descent as well as the ascent.
Astrobrant2 has made several that are very compelling.
The bizarre notion that "we aren't landing on the moon now so it couldn't have happened in 1969" is the most stupid fuckshit reasoning I've ever heard.
In 1961 a bathyscaph descended to the deepest part of the Mariana Trench, we haven't done it since. In 1959 the X-15 flew, we have nothing comparable today.
So i guess those were all fake too. Hell Charles Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic solo in a single engine propeller driven plane 80 years ago that must be fake too Plato.
american government are murderers, they killed three amazing guys to prevent them from blowing NASA's cover just like the american government was behing 9/11and behind roswell etc american people are great and its a shame that their government are their own countrys terrorists!! and the reason the american government are so tight arsed in keeping things from their own countrys people is simply because the american government are full of shit and have fake a great deal fucking attention seekers
NASA will NEVER! admit to it being fake as if their going to come out and say ... ohhhh ok yes we did fake the moon landing yes it never happened, they know if they admitted to it being faked NASA would be well and truly fucked up shit creak without a paddle the law suits would be extreme!!
@JestersYouPube you must be very gullable. have you done any research against this theory? have you even seen the myth busters video on this?? they make the moon landing theorists look like a bunch of morons (because they are). get off of your parents computer and go to school because you are obviously too young to be watching this
@JestersYouPube If mythbusters was "bought off," then there has to be something wrong with their science on each and every one of their examples. Either what they say is provably true or its provably false. So if its false, where and how?
One thing they forgot, there is a speical mirrior on the moon, that can only be installed by people, and you can shine a laser at it, and photons would appear from the moon, from the same laser. there, it has been proven it is real
are all these people commenting proud stubborn americans? they all say it did happen but how do you know???!!!wheres your proof apart from 'its fake' 'my class didnt believe it' wow great conspiracy expertisment guys..
im beginning more and more to think this was faked. all these guys have really good points, and alot. and all I hear from nasa is "no thats not true, no it wasnt fake, no no no" they are just saying that the guys that says it is fake are wrong, they never explain it more then that, its like they cant even make up any good excuses
@baconfromhell666 You really think a HOAX doc would give NASA a fair shake? Why would they make a movie about "HOAX" only to fill it with reasons why their own movie is retarded?
There's nothing in this doc thats competent. The webpage badastronomy com goes thru every point explaning why its stupid, and I even showed it to my astronomy class, and they laughed out of the room using only 10th grade education level. The landing happened
@SpreadingtheMuse So why is it that a company can bask in its glory when they get praise? Community: "Hey, great job on landing on the moon and getting video footage!" -NASA: "Thanks, our technolgical capabilities were well advanced" Community: "Can you explain why the shadows don't run parallel?" -NASA: "Errrmm... No comment!"
@reachISmylife The flag is flimsy piece of cloth on a rigid pole in a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from shaking. Every dinkass footstep or vibration would be channeled right to it. Easy.
Then, what do you mean, distance betweeen lights? There's only one light source, the sun. Anything you may have read otherwise relied on fuzzy assumptions.
@ Light subject I meant because it is a hoax there are or are not multiple light sources if there is only one light source (SUN) Most pictures may prove fake the people would appear as silhouettes
@reachISmylife But if there are multiple light sources, why arent there multiple shadows? Look at TV shows shot on a soundstage, sitcoms. Every actor has 2-3 shadows under him. We dont see that here.
The different angles of light are caused by different angles of sloping ground. Hoax nuts expect a perfectly smooth and flat surface, and thats ridiculous.
@TheEgyptianOne The flag was a flimsy piece of cloth attached to a rigid flagpole in a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from flapping around. The slightest nickel and dime vibration, footstep, or bump would set it off for hours with absolutely nothing to slow it down.
As far as anything left or placed on the surface of the moon, all could have been done by unmanned spacecraft or probes flying over the moon and dropping it to the surface. Even by a roving probe dropped to the surface and then driven off into a crater or to the darkside.
When NASA admitted several years ago that all plans no longer exsisted for all Apollo missions, that's when flags went up for many people. They said it was all destroyed because they had no room to store it????!!!! Huh?
Why would there be wind in a soundstage, either? And why would a crater inside a soundstage be visible by satellite? And are the pictures grainy and hard to make out, or "perfect"?
The flag moves because of the momentum of setting up the flag. They have no pictures of the flag moving when non of the astronauts are close to the flag... Idiots
@jarrod1685 Actually, there is not one single claim made by hoaxers that has not been busted into dust hundreds of times before. It always comes down to a complete failure to comprehend even the simplest of physical concepts, combined with sheer ignorance about the workings of human spaceflight. Read, study, learn, SMARTEN UP.
@jarrod1685 The webpage badastronomy com takes this whole documentary point for point, saying "This is wrong because of..." "Thats wrong because they forgot..." etc. Every single point is exposed as stupid.
Why is it so hard for people to believe that Americans landed on the moon in1969? It's a well known fact that Hitler has been living there since 1945!
911 was 8iside job, and nasa and all usa secret gov companys are all in the game they work weith eachother, i dont believe the 69 landing, the suits had no radiation or heat protection the astronauts woul all be dead today, niot just that but alot other things the fact the usa never did return or anyother nation when they could if its possible with todays tech, im sure history will write it wrongs if the usa was there they left the flag and other things there something that we cannot see today
@ukusapillage Uh OH! ANOTHER hoax newb cut and pasted RADIATION!
You'll have to forgive me, but since I actually work as a Radiological Technician, I have no patience for newbs who yell RADIATION like a tard pretending to be an expert. I actually do the work, I actually know the science.
And I know for a fact whatever you think you know is certified horse shit.
Alpha and Beta radiation are both blocked by PLASTIC. 88% of space radiation is alpha and beta. Arent you glad you asked?
"Loose change" was made by a pack of kids so stupid they've had to rewrite their own movie several times. Havent you watched the old versions vs the new? They got creamed on a bunch of science ignorance and removed those parts from the newer versions. Thats THEIR OWN admission that they screwed up.
Makes you wonder what else they screwed up that they havent admitted yet...
who filmed the take off? how was the data sent to earth back then? who was controlling the camera? also, how the negative film survived in radiation? impossible things!!!!
Remote control camera. TV signal. Remote control. And what are you pretending to know about radiation? I AM a radiologist, and know for a fact whatever you think you read on a dork webpage is certifiable horse manure. Ask someone who knows what hes talking about next time.
"impossible?" WTF rock have you been living under to not know about remote control? Thats inexcusable ignorance.
@2009korte UH OH! Its the stupendous "LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!" comeback. Thank god, I was worried you were going to say something stupid ;)
Look and see what kind of movies I make and upload before you make an idiot of yourself again. I've worked with and done more technical Radiation science in the last month than you'll EVER do ;)
And I still cant believe you're stupid enough to never have heard of Remote Control. Thats been around for 50 YEARS! Newb ;)
have they ever thought of asking the first landers wives/partners as when they returned they would not be able to contain excitment and would constantly talk about it unless they were deamed to silence. and if so y?
So you were there and saw that there were no other lights.
Plus the flag is stiff (well kinda)
so if the astronaut had a problem putting it in to a hole YES it would wave.
Another thing when you speed up a video guess what it will go faster seriously are you Fricking kidding me cmon guys how are there retro reflectors on the moon if there was a craft sent to deploy it the public WOULD HAVE seen it land or come back down to earth
Okay. I have to say this, that NASA spokesman isnt really explaining anything. All he is doing is dening that it was a hoax. Well, thats his job. To deny. And the photo arguement is valid. How are the objects covering the cross hairs??? That proves photo manipulation. If the moon has no atmosphere,then it means it wouldnt be protected from the sun's UV rays.Wouldnt it be a radiation nightmare there??Wouldnt the temprature be crazy?? IDK. But its alot questions that need answers
@joshcannon23 well the crosshairs thing can be answered I dont know about the others. when white is overexposed to other colors it bleeds into it. Thats why most of the crosshairs here that are disappearing are around white objects.
The whole entire footstep thing they did didn't cover everything...When the lunar pod landed on the moon, its thrusters would blow all of the fresh powder away from the pod landing area, right? why is it when Armstrong jumps off of the ladder, powder emerges at his feet and rises into the air? Shouldn't all that powder be elsewhere? Think about it.
@StompyMoose "think about it" Good idea. Lets think about how thrust could move all that dust if there's no air to provide pressure, or create gusts or billows. No air= no air pressure = no big huge plumes of dust = Dust is still there when armstrong steps down.
@Luciferminusone Dont fall for this newb stupidity. We went to the moon and the only people who say we didnt are the 7th grade reading level dorks you see here.
If I really was a 7th grade reading level dork, I would certainly believe in Apollo for I would not see all the incoherences the project contains. I would believe all the "so-called" incoherences have been debunked, that the mythbusters have fully debunked the moon hoax.
But I have made studies which allow me to understand the documentation of Apollo and to see the many incoherences it contains, and this is what makes me a die-hard hoax believer.
That crosshair thing is pretty amazing actually! And there is no air in the moon because the atmosphere is too thin so that means there shouldn't be wind.
Wind is a result of a complicated relationship between high and low pressure zones and that doesn't exist on the moon though however MARS is having global warming melting their polar ice caps which means we have to ban space ships. All the pollution is being blown over to Mars. LOL.
this fucking astronauts are cowards thats why they fake it! i'll volunteer bitches! to be the first man to walk the moon to smoke weed and get high there!
NASA: "It's funny how people make these outrageous claims that we didn't land on te moon...we landed on the moon, because we landed on the moon". That's right...they landed on the moon, because they did...no need for an exlaination with that logic...LMAO
NASA's logic is "We dont need to prove ourselves to scientifically illiterate retards who wouldnt understand anything over a 7th grade reading level." And they're right.
There's nothing about the "hoax" that has a shred of education to it. Its all ignorance hiding behind shouting real loud.
"Let me get this straight, BUZZ, you can remember your kid's birthday 10 years ago, but asked about the greatest experience of your life, 'did you see stars on the trip', you can't recall?" "You can't recall a few days ago?" lol Wait, all three of you can't recall? Hmmm...strange
@livinlife60secamin We can - the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been surveying for 800+ days and has returned detailed images of the Apollo landing sites, as well as finding the two Soviet Lunar rovers and other unmanned probes.
faking the moon would be more complicated ?? because there are no over 400,000 highly skilled craftsmen made those all hardware makin it easy to spot the fake !
Faking the Moon landing would be more complicated than actually landing there. Why? Over 400 000 highly skilled craftsmen had to build all the hardware to space flight standards. Then the craft had to actually launch and fly the entire profile sending "false" data back. Tape recorders would have to be placed on the Moon surface beforehand to simulate radio transmissions as fake replies. The Russians had directional antenna´s picking it all up FROM the Moon and NOT from a warehouse somewhere.
It is not only the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) that takes HD photos of the landing sites. One Chineese and one Japaneese satelite does the same, and they are NOT controlled by NASA or the US goverment. AND to ALL of you confused Hoaxers: ALL the photos document that every Apollo landing site is exactely in the position NASA claimed them to be. Neat is it not? Please find yourselves another web forum to pollute.
@Thinkcity So there's no possibility that in the years later when technology was more advanced, that they could of been put there? I'm interested to know how you think they passed through van allen's belt with no radiation protection?
@doire7 Well. For one thing, if you ask an astronomer he would answer you with "what about it?" Both the Japanese, Indian and Chinese moon orbiter verifies the NASA data that this is not a problem for this kind of short trips. This is factual scientific data. Another thing. Remember this was a space race. If the Russians for ONE minute had believed this was fake, they would have blown this wide open, but they didn´t because they monitored LIVE data from the Apollo spacecraft from the moon.
i remember watching this on tv it changed all what i thought about the moon landing that america was that desperate to beat the Russians they had to fake it bunch of looses
@ivanraz - Those are TV broadcasts, and so the camera left behind was positioned to point towards the craft and hence film the take-off (which would be seen on earth). They could also be remote controlled from earth, therefore for Apollo 16 (and better in 17), they managed to time it correctly to pan the camera upwards and follow the craft during take-off. It's all documented :-)
@ivanraz A ground controller did. A remote controlled camera, not that "strange" or out of this world unbelieavable. I flew RC model aircraft at that time so the technology had been around for a long time.
If this was faked (which it isn't) then I would've been truly impressed by how extremely calm NASA always are when people ask them about these things - buuut since it was all real, and DID HAPPEN, they have no reason to feel uncomfortable.
the hoax guys are truly some frustated people the flag question is simple, the pole was shaped like a L upside down so that the flag did not hang down and reason its moving is beaause the astronauts were moving the flag, AS YOU CAN SEE in the rest of the apollo footage the flag is completely STILL, also on apollo 15 an astronaut did an experiment: dropping an hammer and a falcon feather at the sime time they fell at the same rate and hit the groung at the same time somehitng not possible on eart
We've now got pictures of landing sites (which clearly show astronaut foot tracks, lunar rover tracks, and even THE lunar rover itself) from Apollo missions 12, 14, and 17. Done, Done, and DONE! But still, to EVERY LAST ONE of you hoax believers, SHOVE IT!! All of your theories are nothing more than THEORIES - never the first, and I mean NEVER EVER EVER even the FIRST shred of evidence to support ANY of the hoax theories. So once again you hoax believers - shove it! You're done! :-)
@mattjcliffe Never said they proved the videos were "true" but since you're asking - Sure, I guess they do. USA is the only country claiming to have been to these sites, aaaaaaand USA has some of these "people" you speak of as well (you still with me MJC..?). So unless you're claiming you were the one that made the footprints, thank you for your single sentence contradiction & support of my comments :) I'll spare you the closing command - You know where to put it!
@LeventNimet he does not need to... all the questions people asked about no starts the light on the moon etc etc etc are answered with scientific facts just search on the internet..
@LeventNimet the answers in the internet i talked about are the answers given by NASA itself, not some people trying to answer something like the people who claim it was an hoax that every one of the conspirators have a different story, and its answered with scientific facts that explain everything, also to point out there are official photos of landing sites on these days by the probes sent to the moon, just search
@LeventNimet and as I said on the reply above to you NASA has answered each claim point by point, but if they were to do that on this documentary then the WHOLE of the documentary would be some nasa guy explaining, and of course the producers of this program would not do that, and don't forget something, the same credibility that some websites may have its the same that some tv programs may have, dont forget tv programs are to be shocking or whathever to make people watch them
@LeventNimet if I havent said NASA then my mistake, what I wanted to say is websites thats have the NASA answers. and for the NASA "expert" he may not be a NASA expert but a public relations guy from NASA since he is a spokesman, but NASA has answers for those questions here in the video ALSO there photos of the landing sites taken by probes who are/were orbiting the moon.
@VamYang mythbusters aint prove one shit! let the conspiracy theorist enter their facility and let's see if NASA would allow them and besides, the mythbuster guys are friends with phil plait
so of the THOUSANDS of people required to pull of this kind of hoax, not a SINGLE person EVER told anyone? Not their family, their freinds, their co-workers, nobody? How could such a hurculean feat be accomplished?
which was transmitted from australia, it's true. ? But they did not land on the moon, if the Luner Pictures provided by NASA's own website are just redicules, in this day and age with the cameras we have and thats what NASA website can show you, come on, see how much the USA get away with. cheers. :)
the EASIEST way they could have proved they went is if they opened a container of water. in zero pressure the water should boil, which would be the illest thing ever.
Watch the mythbusters on this. On some of the identical pictures. Astronauts followed other astronauts tracks.
sharksldw 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The science argument has decisively been won by the moon hoax proponents, but NASA and their apologists are masters of deception and obfuscation. So much so that they can make utter nonsense appear credible.
So keep it simple and concentrate on exposing NASA's proven lies, such as those relating to the chronology of the two "C-rock" photos. They wouldn't have lied if they had nothing to hide. Just one lie proves that the whole thing was a lie. And we have that proven lie to end this argument.
BritishTruthSeeker 4 days ago
Comment removed
BritishTruthSeeker 4 days ago
Comment removed
yayoineko 1 week ago
@yayoineko Who cares? How about millions of people who don't think it's okay to be lied to by their government? Tsk tsk. Wake up.
katewil24 1 week ago
@katewil24 I think its even worse to be lied to by ignorant conspiracy gluttons. As bad as the gov is, its still more believable than some random dufus whining on a dork webpage
SpreadingtheMuse 5 days ago
Thank you Mythbusters for busting these stupid ass hoax claims.
JeremeK 1 week ago in playlist More videos from ravishankar09 2
grany because they were transmitting signal in the 60's from the fucking moon!
45678ret 1 week ago 2
I have a great idea! hows about we take one of those powerful telescopes we use to view into deep space and look at the spot were we were supposed to have landed on the surface of the moon? On a clear night i dont see how that could be a problem. but maybe im wrong and its to simple:/
Wheedlinglemur 2 weeks ago
@Wheedlinglemur Look at the LRO pictures of the landing sites. (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter)
hceely 2 weeks ago
@Wheedlinglemur Not even hubble space telescope is able to picture the moon with such a high resolution. There are many different calculations about it on the internet, and they're all about 170 metres resolution. It could be possible to picture the lander's shadow when the sun is very low, but this appears to be very tricky, as you need to have a >170m shadow and there is a lot of shadow on the moon.
You could also send an orbiter to have a look at it, but why should NASA do so?
weristsimon 2 weeks ago
@weristsimon Buzz was orbiting the moon at that point in the mission as they said "now the Moon's own moon"
kajakpaddler92 1 week ago
@Wheedlinglemur Actually they arent saying that Nasa didnt go to the moon.. they are saying that they didnt send a man to the moon.. so even if you could see leftovers from the mission it still doesnt prove anything
killswitch3ngag3 1 week ago
@Wheedlinglemur the problem is... astronomers are bussy why much very important pieces of work... they have no time to pay atention to conspiracy theorists...
kajakpaddler92 1 week ago
Solar wind maybe? 2:03
01username001 2 weeks ago
It's fairly easy to see that it was staged. Look at the timing as well. The Russians launched Sputnik; the US had to do something to boost moral. So they staged the moon landing. That's not what concerns me. From this and other events, we know that the government can and will lie to the people. The REAL question is: What else have they lied about?
shaolinmantis77 2 weeks ago
@shaolinmantis77 how old are you ?
parsonman05 2 weeks ago
do people really think that N.A.S.A could make such obvious mistakes while 'faking' the moon landing?
MrYub 2 weeks ago
@SpreadingtheMuse No I have my own wifi, probably just a bad satellite connection or something.
BazilRathbunTV 2 weeks ago
everything is bullshit!!!
naitvezombie 3 weeks ago
how could N.A.S.A. faked all the Apollo missions??
skatingstar26 3 weeks ago
If you ask me, FOX is making this documentary up out of their arse...
elpelu123 3 weeks ago
@elpelu123 the only thing fox group is good for is comedy !!!
parsonman05 2 weeks ago
What the hell? They get radio transmissions, and recordings for video, yet I can barely get internet connection in my HOUSE?!
BazilRathbunTV 4 weeks ago
@BazilRathbunTV Are you stealing someone elses wi fi? Or you have a sucky satellite connection?
SpreadingtheMuse 3 weeks ago
The computers they had those days were not more advanced than a calulator. You could probably do more with a Commodore 64. It makes doubtful that they went to the moon. The will was there but not the technology.
GrinningSandCat 4 weeks ago
373,746 ppl we meet again :)
Thompson1246 1 month ago
i use to believe it completely real
now it gives another side of the story
hmm... interesting still
Mikeyz94 1 month ago
@Mikeyz94 watch mythbusters about the landing on the moon and then you will have no idea if it is real or not!!
skatingstar26 1 month ago
American's for ya
tmevans1707 1 month ago
they probably used a potato to shoot the moon landing images XD
BagelzZzMonicaLol 1 month ago 2
THOSE BASTARDS! >=O
flexramos3000 1 month ago
All the moon landings were faked. I personally think everyone who thinks the moon landings were faked i think we should get together, and try sue nasa !
mrstevoh123 1 month ago
i can understand the fact that transmitting these images from the moon to earth would cause some distortion. but why not have a hard copy to bring home and show on tv.
rizzthakid 1 month ago
The bit on shadows is so elementary i don't know how it even makes it into a video on the conspiracy. It is well know that light reflects OFF surfaces (moons surface) and will then hit and reflect off other surfaces (astronauts, lunar module). Don't beleive me, then go outside at night during a full moon, you will be able to see quite clearly when your eyes adjust. Remember that you can see clearly from the moons light from 400 000 km away, think how bright it would be on the surface.
12connor213 1 month ago
Ahhh This is the FOX TV show that manipulated all of the gullible masses!!
This why there's so many Moon conspiracy clowns on the Y-Tube!
Thanks Rupert Murdock for you contribution.
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
@Tweekerhead I use to believe this when i was young, I use to defend for Nasa.But sadly the truth is that we didn't land on the moon..Ok, even if we did, why they are not even thinking of going back with technology that we have in this millennium 2011, the Russians,Japanese,Britts are not even thinking of giving it a try..Neil Armstrong knew that future generation will find the truth, that's the reason he gave a cryptic speech with tears at Nasa's Moon landing anniversary..:(
saggatarian 1 month ago
@saggatarian Whenever someone starts by saying"I used to believe",usually means their epistemology is screwed up.
My belief for Apollo is based on facts not emotion.I don't have faith that 12 men walked on the Moon, I've seen the overwhelming evidence.
You sound as if you know Mr. Armstrong the way you talk about his character & motives. You're not from a little town in Ohio where the Armstrong family moved to in 1973 are ya'?
There's not one prohibitive aspect of the Moon landings.
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
I don't know Armstrong, But i know what 40 billion dollars can do in the 70's ..Alright we landed on the moon, If that's the truth i can accept it heart-fully, But "Only Nasa can land on the moon", hope they will do it again in the future...Cheers..:)
saggatarian 1 month ago
@saggatarian Good to have an open mind, I hope you find some evidence that seals the deal for ya' about Apollo.
Several here on Y-tube have made videos comparing the LRO(Lunar Recon' Orbiter) with the 16mm films that the crews of Apollo have taken from the LM during lunar descent as well as the ascent.
Astrobrant2 has made several that are very compelling.
Good luck, hope you find it.
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
@saggatarian
The bizarre notion that "we aren't landing on the moon now so it couldn't have happened in 1969" is the most stupid fuckshit reasoning I've ever heard.
In 1961 a bathyscaph descended to the deepest part of the Mariana Trench, we haven't done it since. In 1959 the X-15 flew, we have nothing comparable today.
So i guess those were all fake too. Hell Charles Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic solo in a single engine propeller driven plane 80 years ago that must be fake too Plato.
Blahblobify 1 month ago
If the moon landings are true why, with modern technology and powerful telescopes there are no pictures of the flag that was left there??
evoicus 1 month ago
what a lier!! land to the sun NASA
thewho186 1 month ago
@thewho186 they'd burn to death if they even got within a few thousand miles of it! O.O
beattles93 1 month ago
nasa should prove the moon landing by doing it again
thewho186 1 month ago
american government are murderers, they killed three amazing guys to prevent them from blowing NASA's cover just like the american government was behing 9/11and behind roswell etc american people are great and its a shame that their government are their own countrys terrorists!! and the reason the american government are so tight arsed in keeping things from their own countrys people is simply because the american government are full of shit and have fake a great deal fucking attention seekers
JestersYouPube 1 month ago
NASA will NEVER! admit to it being fake as if their going to come out and say ... ohhhh ok yes we did fake the moon landing yes it never happened, they know if they admitted to it being faked NASA would be well and truly fucked up shit creak without a paddle the law suits would be extreme!!
JestersYouPube 1 month ago
Comment removed
89kennyk 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JestersYouPube you must be very gullable. have you done any research against this theory? have you even seen the myth busters video on this?? they make the moon landing theorists look like a bunch of morons (because they are). get off of your parents computer and go to school because you are obviously too young to be watching this
89kennyk 1 month ago
@JestersYouPube If mythbusters was "bought off," then there has to be something wrong with their science on each and every one of their examples. Either what they say is provably true or its provably false. So if its false, where and how?
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
myth busters missed a lot of other factors
JestersYouPube 1 month ago
One thing they forgot, there is a speical mirrior on the moon, that can only be installed by people, and you can shine a laser at it, and photons would appear from the moon, from the same laser. there, it has been proven it is real
chard6788 2 months ago
are all these people commenting proud stubborn americans? they all say it did happen but how do you know???!!!wheres your proof apart from 'its fake' 'my class didnt believe it' wow great conspiracy expertisment guys..
indiemusicluver3 2 months ago
@indiemusicluver3 "Its fake cause I gullibly believed a dork webpage" is usually all the evidence we ever get.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
im beginning more and more to think this was faked. all these guys have really good points, and alot. and all I hear from nasa is "no thats not true, no it wasnt fake, no no no" they are just saying that the guys that says it is fake are wrong, they never explain it more then that, its like they cant even make up any good excuses
baconfromhell666 2 months ago 2
@baconfromhell666 You really think a HOAX doc would give NASA a fair shake? Why would they make a movie about "HOAX" only to fill it with reasons why their own movie is retarded?
There's nothing in this doc thats competent. The webpage badastronomy com goes thru every point explaning why its stupid, and I even showed it to my astronomy class, and they laughed out of the room using only 10th grade education level. The landing happened
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse So why is it that a company can bask in its glory when they get praise? Community: "Hey, great job on landing on the moon and getting video footage!" -NASA: "Thanks, our technolgical capabilities were well advanced" Community: "Can you explain why the shadows don't run parallel?" -NASA: "Errrmm... No comment!"
lordrevanchist 2 months ago
@lordrevanchist
1) Its not NASA's job to counter ever nickel and dime fuckwad who cut and pastes a talking point from a dork webpage
2) They do it anyway, and there's dozens of webpages and such that do so
3) Again, you cant expect a dork hoax movie to give NASA a fair shake
4) The shadows ARE parallel. You're looking at uneven ground
5) If there were mulitple light sources, then why arent there mulitiple shadows? 2-3 for each leg?
Every hoax claim has an answer.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
If that is so then why does the flag shake?
Uneven I think not...
Distance between lights and the object....
Answer...
HOAX
reachISmylife 2 months ago
@reachISmylife The flag is flimsy piece of cloth on a rigid pole in a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from shaking. Every dinkass footstep or vibration would be channeled right to it. Easy.
Then, what do you mean, distance betweeen lights? There's only one light source, the sun. Anything you may have read otherwise relied on fuzzy assumptions.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
@ Light subject I meant because it is a hoax there are or are not multiple light sources if there is only one light source (SUN) Most pictures may prove fake the people would appear as silhouettes
reachISmylife 2 months ago
@reachISmylife But if there are multiple light sources, why arent there multiple shadows? Look at TV shows shot on a soundstage, sitcoms. Every actor has 2-3 shadows under him. We dont see that here.
The different angles of light are caused by different angles of sloping ground. Hoax nuts expect a perfectly smooth and flat surface, and thats ridiculous.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse then why the fuck was the flag flopping around
TheEgyptianOne 1 month ago
@TheEgyptianOne The flag was a flimsy piece of cloth attached to a rigid flagpole in a frictionless environment. Try to STOP IT from flapping around. The slightest nickel and dime vibration, footstep, or bump would set it off for hours with absolutely nothing to slow it down.
SpreadingtheMuse 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As far as anything left or placed on the surface of the moon, all could have been done by unmanned spacecraft or probes flying over the moon and dropping it to the surface. Even by a roving probe dropped to the surface and then driven off into a crater or to the darkside.
When NASA admitted several years ago that all plans no longer exsisted for all Apollo missions, that's when flags went up for many people. They said it was all destroyed because they had no room to store it????!!!! Huh?
thexrayman50 2 months ago
Why would there be wind in a soundstage, either? And why would a crater inside a soundstage be visible by satellite? And are the pictures grainy and hard to make out, or "perfect"?
RachelHC 2 months ago
I like the part where Buzz Aldrin punches out Bart Sibrel.
boringsermonify 2 months ago
FAKE AND GAY
kanedalysh 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kanedalysh Talking about yourself? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
FAKE AND GAY
kanedalysh 2 months ago
The flag moves because of the momentum of setting up the flag. They have no pictures of the flag moving when non of the astronauts are close to the flag... Idiots
Nero3335 2 months ago
alot of americans need to swollow there pride and relise the truth,theres so many,contributing factors that proves the moon landing was a hoax
jarrod1685 2 months ago
@jarrod1685 Actually, there is not one single claim made by hoaxers that has not been busted into dust hundreds of times before. It always comes down to a complete failure to comprehend even the simplest of physical concepts, combined with sheer ignorance about the workings of human spaceflight. Read, study, learn, SMARTEN UP.
aigg 2 months ago
@aigg tell me a internet site which proves this,im interested
jarrod1685 2 months ago
@jarrod1685 Here is what you do
1. You gather as many hoax claims as possible
2. You read and learn about the details of the apollo program
3. You read and learn at least basic physics
4. You take the overwhelming harmonic consensus of the entire scientific community into account
5. You take into account that equipment left by the missions are still in use today
6. You take into account that we have images taken from lunar orbit clearly showing the lander and rover
7. You then make up your mind
aigg 2 months ago
@jarrod1685 The webpage badastronomy com takes this whole documentary point for point, saying "This is wrong because of..." "Thats wrong because they forgot..." etc. Every single point is exposed as stupid.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
definitely a hoax!
FUSER2K07 2 months ago in playlist More videos from ravishankar09
Why is it so hard for people to believe that Americans landed on the moon in1969? It's a well known fact that Hitler has been living there since 1945!
ThePurist007 2 months ago in playlist Moon landings Science in the News Practice
AMERICA = LIE
ricardoquaresma4ever 2 months ago
@ricardoquaresma4ever hoax believers = RETARD.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 months ago
911 was 8iside job, and nasa and all usa secret gov companys are all in the game they work weith eachother, i dont believe the 69 landing, the suits had no radiation or heat protection the astronauts woul all be dead today, niot just that but alot other things the fact the usa never did return or anyother nation when they could if its possible with todays tech, im sure history will write it wrongs if the usa was there they left the flag and other things there something that we cannot see today
ukusapillage 3 months ago
@ukusapillage Uh OH! ANOTHER hoax newb cut and pasted RADIATION!
You'll have to forgive me, but since I actually work as a Radiological Technician, I have no patience for newbs who yell RADIATION like a tard pretending to be an expert. I actually do the work, I actually know the science.
And I know for a fact whatever you think you know is certified horse shit.
Alpha and Beta radiation are both blocked by PLASTIC. 88% of space radiation is alpha and beta. Arent you glad you asked?
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
9/11 was an inside job. Who benefited financially from the controlled demolition of the World Trade Centre?
That's right, the Media, The Goverment, The Arms Industry.
Youtube "Loose Change" and Alex Jones.
As for naysayers with that "I believe the government everytime" attitude won't pretect you for much longer.
Drugs, Organised Crime, The Economy, YOUR JOB, Wars for Oil, standard of living, moral values is declining and its all inter-related by design.
MrBOPESquad2 3 months ago
@MrBOPESquad2
"Loose change" was made by a pack of kids so stupid they've had to rewrite their own movie several times. Havent you watched the old versions vs the new? They got creamed on a bunch of science ignorance and removed those parts from the newer versions. Thats THEIR OWN admission that they screwed up.
Makes you wonder what else they screwed up that they havent admitted yet...
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
who filmed the take off? how was the data sent to earth back then? who was controlling the camera? also, how the negative film survived in radiation? impossible things!!!!
2009korte 3 months ago
@2009korte Answers in order:
Remote control camera. TV signal. Remote control. And what are you pretending to know about radiation? I AM a radiologist, and know for a fact whatever you think you read on a dork webpage is certifiable horse manure. Ask someone who knows what hes talking about next time.
"impossible?" WTF rock have you been living under to not know about remote control? Thats inexcusable ignorance.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
wireless data transfer? you are not a radiologist i can read between ur lines but nice try.
2009korte 3 months ago
@2009korte UH OH! Its the stupendous "LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!" comeback. Thank god, I was worried you were going to say something stupid ;)
Look and see what kind of movies I make and upload before you make an idiot of yourself again. I've worked with and done more technical Radiation science in the last month than you'll EVER do ;)
And I still cant believe you're stupid enough to never have heard of Remote Control. Thats been around for 50 YEARS! Newb ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
now try to relax, no need to insult. is there radiation on the moon?
2009korte 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
oh man this is serious. i watched a few videos of yours. what can i say? you need help:-( good bye
2009korte 3 months ago
@2009korte THANK GOD you're here! I almost listened to my professional colleagues and students who use my stuff if their classrooms everyday ;)
Yutz ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
u also have to question how is the American flag straight when its waving ???
ActiveXx2 3 months ago
5:09, look at reflection
pdaniel8 3 months ago
have they ever thought of asking the first landers wives/partners as when they returned they would not be able to contain excitment and would constantly talk about it unless they were deamed to silence. and if so y?
bulletshilo 3 months ago
omg your full of it you know that.
So you were there and saw that there were no other lights.
Plus the flag is stiff (well kinda)
so if the astronaut had a problem putting it in to a hole YES it would wave.
Another thing when you speed up a video guess what it will go faster seriously are you Fricking kidding me cmon guys how are there retro reflectors on the moon if there was a craft sent to deploy it the public WOULD HAVE seen it land or come back down to earth
squaidsgiver21 3 months ago
Okay. I have to say this, that NASA spokesman isnt really explaining anything. All he is doing is dening that it was a hoax. Well, thats his job. To deny. And the photo arguement is valid. How are the objects covering the cross hairs??? That proves photo manipulation. If the moon has no atmosphere,then it means it wouldnt be protected from the sun's UV rays.Wouldnt it be a radiation nightmare there??Wouldnt the temprature be crazy?? IDK. But its alot questions that need answers
joshcannon23 3 months ago in playlist More videos from ravishankar09
@joshcannon23 well the crosshairs thing can be answered I dont know about the others. when white is overexposed to other colors it bleeds into it. Thats why most of the crosshairs here that are disappearing are around white objects.
eMCeeShyGuy 3 months ago
The whole entire footstep thing they did didn't cover everything...When the lunar pod landed on the moon, its thrusters would blow all of the fresh powder away from the pod landing area, right? why is it when Armstrong jumps off of the ladder, powder emerges at his feet and rises into the air? Shouldn't all that powder be elsewhere? Think about it.
StompyMoose 3 months ago
@StompyMoose "think about it" Good idea. Lets think about how thrust could move all that dust if there's no air to provide pressure, or create gusts or billows. No air= no air pressure = no big huge plumes of dust = Dust is still there when armstrong steps down.
Arent you glad we thought about it? ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse I enjoy your philosophy :) Thanks for replying your side, btw.
StompyMoose 3 months ago
@StompyMoose One thing I love to do, is reply my side ;) Thanks for being generous about it all. Its usually rough around here.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SpreadingtheMuse (air to provide pressure, or create gusts or billows) this supposed to be made by Apollo not by the Air or pressure on the Moon.
adrianaveliz 3 months ago
It sucks that we didn't go to the moon. :( Now a days I bet my life we can do it without it being fake if we really wanted to.
Luciferminusone 3 months ago
@Luciferminusone Dont fall for this newb stupidity. We went to the moon and the only people who say we didnt are the 7th grade reading level dorks you see here.
SpreadingtheMuse 3 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse
If I really was a 7th grade reading level dork, I would certainly believe in Apollo for I would not see all the incoherences the project contains. I would believe all the "so-called" incoherences have been debunked, that the mythbusters have fully debunked the moon hoax.
But I have made studies which allow me to understand the documentation of Apollo and to see the many incoherences it contains, and this is what makes me a die-hard hoax believer.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
@Luciferminusone
No, I don't think it would be possible to do it even today.
It is really much more difficult than some imagine.
hunchbacked 3 months ago
That crosshair thing is pretty amazing actually! And there is no air in the moon because the atmosphere is too thin so that means there shouldn't be wind.
Wind is a result of a complicated relationship between high and low pressure zones and that doesn't exist on the moon though however MARS is having global warming melting their polar ice caps which means we have to ban space ships. All the pollution is being blown over to Mars. LOL.
Luciferminusone 3 months ago
busted!
Bexly 3 months ago
THE LIGHT WAS REFLECTING OFF OF THE GROUND FUCKING IDIOTS
AndyAngelZ 3 months ago
@AndyAngelZ CROSS HAIRS BEHIND THE SUBJECT MATERIAL IS IMPOSSIBLE FUCKING IDIOT
smokebeerdrinktabs 3 months ago
4:55 i was really curious with that theory
danielgrvff 3 months ago
I honestly dont think we made it to the mone like your telling me back in 1960 we made a racket that flew up there and landed~! bull
matthew121314151617 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"If you can't make it, fake it."
mardthedino 4 months ago
Fake
harissyah17 4 months ago
4:36.
thats all i gotta say. LOL
CLARKwahlberg 4 months ago
this fucking astronauts are cowards thats why they fake it! i'll volunteer bitches! to be the first man to walk the moon to smoke weed and get high there!
OGkush815 4 months ago
@OGkush815 theres no air on the moon, have fun lighting up ur blunt there lool :P
ahmeddalshammari 3 months ago
@ahmeddalshammari HAHAHA :D im just kidding, you're taking it seriously xD
OGkush815 3 months ago
@OGkush815 loool not even i was jokin along with ya lol
ahmeddalshammari 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ahmeddalshammari HA HA HA
OGkush815 3 months ago
@hellfirenlnl but they didn't drop their space programs, they're one of the few nations still out there.
Khuratokh 4 months ago
If it was a hoax, why didn't the Russians call the US out?
Khuratokh 4 months ago
NASA: "It's funny how people make these outrageous claims that we didn't land on te moon...we landed on the moon, because we landed on the moon". That's right...they landed on the moon, because they did...no need for an exlaination with that logic...LMAO
stephen2152002 4 months ago
@stephen2152002
NASA's logic is "We dont need to prove ourselves to scientifically illiterate retards who wouldnt understand anything over a 7th grade reading level." And they're right.
There's nothing about the "hoax" that has a shred of education to it. Its all ignorance hiding behind shouting real loud.
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
"Let me get this straight, BUZZ, you can remember your kid's birthday 10 years ago, but asked about the greatest experience of your life, 'did you see stars on the trip', you can't recall?" "You can't recall a few days ago?" lol Wait, all three of you can't recall? Hmmm...strange
stephen2152002 4 months ago
FAKE
MrTHEend654 4 months ago
8:47 "they're wrong THIS, they're wrong THAT, they're wrong THE OTHER ...... but I'm not going to explain WHY they're wrong" ;-)
Mosley2 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ravishankar09
If we have telescopes that can see galaxies from light years away.. why can't we get a clear image of the evidence that was left behind on the moon?
livinlife60secamin 4 months ago
@livinlife60secamin We can - the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been surveying for 800+ days and has returned detailed images of the Apollo landing sites, as well as finding the two Soviet Lunar rovers and other unmanned probes.
krisdevalle 4 months ago
faking the moon would be more complicated ?? because there are no over 400,000 highly skilled craftsmen made those all hardware makin it easy to spot the fake !
casp3rization 4 months ago
111 mindless idiots DIDN'T watch this but voted anyway.
Mosley2 4 months ago
Faking the Moon landing would be more complicated than actually landing there. Why? Over 400 000 highly skilled craftsmen had to build all the hardware to space flight standards. Then the craft had to actually launch and fly the entire profile sending "false" data back. Tape recorders would have to be placed on the Moon surface beforehand to simulate radio transmissions as fake replies. The Russians had directional antenna´s picking it all up FROM the Moon and NOT from a warehouse somewhere.
Thinkcity 4 months ago
9/11 coverup, moon landing hoaxes...fuk you nasa and u.s. goverment
cunts
ricodelta1 4 months ago
It is not only the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) that takes HD photos of the landing sites. One Chineese and one Japaneese satelite does the same, and they are NOT controlled by NASA or the US goverment. AND to ALL of you confused Hoaxers: ALL the photos document that every Apollo landing site is exactely in the position NASA claimed them to be. Neat is it not? Please find yourselves another web forum to pollute.
Thinkcity 4 months ago
@Thinkcity So there's no possibility that in the years later when technology was more advanced, that they could of been put there? I'm interested to know how you think they passed through van allen's belt with no radiation protection?
doire7 4 months ago
@doire7 Well. For one thing, if you ask an astronomer he would answer you with "what about it?" Both the Japanese, Indian and Chinese moon orbiter verifies the NASA data that this is not a problem for this kind of short trips. This is factual scientific data. Another thing. Remember this was a space race. If the Russians for ONE minute had believed this was fake, they would have blown this wide open, but they didn´t because they monitored LIVE data from the Apollo spacecraft from the moon.
Thinkcity 4 months ago
well why dont they go up now and see if there is a flag there?
PublicNoiseAZ 4 months ago
@PublicNoiseAZ Well it's not free to go there x)
sebbeas123 4 months ago
i remember watching this on tv it changed all what i thought about the moon landing that america was that desperate to beat the Russians they had to fake it bunch of looses
XxRaNdOmJoInTxX 4 months ago
Anyone who really believe the moon landing was a hoax is plain stupid! Seen the new pictures from NASA???
IHIKML 4 months ago 2
@IHIKML I've never met so many "stupid" physicists then as when I was working at CAL-T and UH
mattjcliffe 4 months ago
who the fuck filmed the take-off???? :)))
ivanraz 4 months ago
@ivanraz - Those are TV broadcasts, and so the camera left behind was positioned to point towards the craft and hence film the take-off (which would be seen on earth). They could also be remote controlled from earth, therefore for Apollo 16 (and better in 17), they managed to time it correctly to pan the camera upwards and follow the craft during take-off. It's all documented :-)
MTMind2 4 months ago
@ivanraz A ground controller did. A remote controlled camera, not that "strange" or out of this world unbelieavable. I flew RC model aircraft at that time so the technology had been around for a long time.
Thinkcity 4 months ago
If this was faked (which it isn't) then I would've been truly impressed by how extremely calm NASA always are when people ask them about these things - buuut since it was all real, and DID HAPPEN, they have no reason to feel uncomfortable.
Laurelindo 4 months ago
I prefer the Transformers version...
johanmagnus 4 months ago
the hoax guys are truly some frustated people the flag question is simple, the pole was shaped like a L upside down so that the flag did not hang down and reason its moving is beaause the astronauts were moving the flag, AS YOU CAN SEE in the rest of the apollo footage the flag is completely STILL, also on apollo 15 an astronaut did an experiment: dropping an hammer and a falcon feather at the sime time they fell at the same rate and hit the groung at the same time somehitng not possible on eart
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
We've now got pictures of landing sites (which clearly show astronaut foot tracks, lunar rover tracks, and even THE lunar rover itself) from Apollo missions 12, 14, and 17. Done, Done, and DONE! But still, to EVERY LAST ONE of you hoax believers, SHOVE IT!! All of your theories are nothing more than THEORIES - never the first, and I mean NEVER EVER EVER even the FIRST shred of evidence to support ANY of the hoax theories. So once again you hoax believers - shove it! You're done! :-)
hotmoffitt 4 months ago
@hotmoffitt footprints prove the videos are true ? I dont think so they prove people have been there.
"SHOVE IT!!"
I take it your American btw ? lol
mattjcliffe 4 months ago
@mattjcliffe Never said they proved the videos were "true" but since you're asking - Sure, I guess they do. USA is the only country claiming to have been to these sites, aaaaaaand USA has some of these "people" you speak of as well (you still with me MJC..?). So unless you're claiming you were the one that made the footprints, thank you for your single sentence contradiction & support of my comments :) I'll spare you the closing command - You know where to put it!
hotmoffitt 4 months ago
Then what about this quote I just found from 9/6?: Remarkable new images of the Apollo landing sites on the Moon have been released by Nasa.
The pictures clearly show the hardware left on the lunar surface by American astronauts in the 1960s and 70s, including Apollo 17's "Moon buggy"
ArgotMay 4 months ago in playlist Moon Landing Hoax
this video is a hoax.. LOLs
mebagtilay41287 4 months ago
this shit is pretty convincing im not gonna lie. very good proof
baileyk4394 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Copy and Paste this into the search: Ultra Close-Up Views of the Apollo 11 Landing Site
VamYang 4 months ago
The nasa spokesman continually says the conspiracy theorists are wrong,
yet never corrects any of their points, he just repeats the same mantra..
oh they're wrong...they're wrong... great argument nasa!!
LeventNimet 4 months ago
@LeventNimet he does not need to... all the questions people asked about no starts the light on the moon etc etc etc are answered with scientific facts just search on the internet..
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
@TigzaMigzatesPT Well, no point in the nasa "expert" being interviewed
then, as he most certainly doesn't breed confidence. Nasa themselves should answer each claim point by point, (which I though was kind of the idea
of the interviews and documentary)..however, I'll search some of the points raised,
but again, why should I go to questionable websites, that could be written
by anyone, and have no accountability... hence the reason for Nasa to put the
theories to bed, via such documentaries.
LeventNimet 4 months ago
@LeventNimet the answers in the internet i talked about are the answers given by NASA itself, not some people trying to answer something like the people who claim it was an hoax that every one of the conspirators have a different story, and its answered with scientific facts that explain everything, also to point out there are official photos of landing sites on these days by the probes sent to the moon, just search
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
@LeventNimet and as I said on the reply above to you NASA has answered each claim point by point, but if they were to do that on this documentary then the WHOLE of the documentary would be some nasa guy explaining, and of course the producers of this program would not do that, and don't forget something, the same credibility that some websites may have its the same that some tv programs may have, dont forget tv programs are to be shocking or whathever to make people watch them
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
@Tigza You never said NASA had answered the anomalies,
you said websites had (read your post). As for the credibility of the
documentary, that's the whole purpose of the "NASA EXPERT" being
on the program isn't it? to correct the "shocking" elements of the
theorists? What about the experts in this video who disagree with
your distinguished facts? They make better arguments
then your NASA expert, and can equally site "facts" and websites.
Anyway, I'm not after a pen-pal, so over and out!!!
LeventNimet 4 months ago
@LeventNimet if I havent said NASA then my mistake, what I wanted to say is websites thats have the NASA answers. and for the NASA "expert" he may not be a NASA expert but a public relations guy from NASA since he is a spokesman, but NASA has answers for those questions here in the video ALSO there photos of the landing sites taken by probes who are/were orbiting the moon.
TigzaMigzatesPT 4 months ago
im sure the light bouncing off the earth would cast some light on the moon - idk
PrimeTargetSecurity 4 months ago
Myth Busters proved it: youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1hiKpLI
VamYang 5 months ago
@VamYang mythbusters aint prove one shit! let the conspiracy theorist enter their facility and let's see if NASA would allow them and besides, the mythbuster guys are friends with phil plait
FLOYDNOBALLS118 4 months ago
@FLOYDNOBALLS118
We're going to trust Phil Plait before we trust an 8th grade mcjob newb like you ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
@SpreadingtheMuse HEY BURGER KING, YOUR THRONE IS IN THE KITCHEN, KEEP IT CLEAN YOU GARBAGE PIECE OF TRASH!
BURGER! BURGER! BURGER!
BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
BWAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
BWAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
FLOYDNOBALLS118 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FLOYDNOBALLS118 We're going to trust Phil Plait before we trust an 8th grade mcjob newb like you ;)
SpreadingtheMuse 4 months ago
so of the THOUSANDS of people required to pull of this kind of hoax, not a SINGLE person EVER told anyone? Not their family, their freinds, their co-workers, nobody? How could such a hurculean feat be accomplished?
wrylie188 5 months ago in playlist we never landed on the moon
which was transmitted from australia, it's true. ? But they did not land on the moon, if the Luner Pictures provided by NASA's own website are just redicules, in this day and age with the cameras we have and thats what NASA website can show you, come on, see how much the USA get away with. cheers. :)
7071t6 5 months ago
proof that we land in moon :
we are able to circle the moon 42 years after our repeated landing on the moon.
it's more difficult to circle you know
mayaforpeaceful 5 months ago
daym!!! im baffled by how much i now belive this. the only thing i dont get, if they faked it.. why?!
MakeMeLaughComedy 5 months ago
@MakeMeLaughComedy The first video said that the first one to reach the moon conquer the "war" or some shit.
Ninocompain 4 months ago
the EASIEST way they could have proved they went is if they opened a container of water. in zero pressure the water should boil, which would be the illest thing ever.
imachavel 5 months ago
the flag waving part is so stupid. the flag is obviously waving because he is holding it. how many flags wave with the end flat o