i think j&j jas nothing against the red cross it's just they have to protect what they build.u do reaiize that j&j helps millions of people as well as the red cross does.
This is a pro-Red Cross, anti-business sort of video. It seems ARC's protective nature per its logo is coming home to roost. In 1973 the NHTSA/DOT sought to use an ORANGE cross as a standard logo for ambulances according to its ambulance standards. The Red Cross complained and DOT researched this. They found ARC had a valid case. In a way I wish the ARC had let well enough alone. I think they were mad because they used to handle all ambulance attendant training before DOT/EMS.
i think j&j jas nothing against the red cross it's just they have to protect what they build.u do reaiize that j&j helps millions of people as well as the red cross does.
SnoopAftermath 1 year ago
This is a pro-Red Cross, anti-business sort of video. It seems ARC's protective nature per its logo is coming home to roost. In 1973 the NHTSA/DOT sought to use an ORANGE cross as a standard logo for ambulances according to its ambulance standards. The Red Cross complained and DOT researched this. They found ARC had a valid case. In a way I wish the ARC had let well enough alone. I think they were mad because they used to handle all ambulance attendant training before DOT/EMS.
wkat950 3 years ago
I am glad J&J lost. The american red cross saves and helps millions of lives, not just put a band aid on it.
focusfitnessonline 3 years ago
Great use of american red cross promotional footage. Just be careful of potential copyright issues.
lucasmatze 4 years ago