中国中央电视台 防务新观察 2009.11.29 — 反舰弹道导弹—航母的天敌？ Part2

[queasyeasy]

This video is explaining how we are fools to rely on present defense of flattops. Also, the Cox Report explains where China got their missile tech: It was from our lawmakers that they got it. Because we must build up our enemies, according to psychopathic leadership thinking. What would we do if we do not build up our adversary? Yes it sounds suicidal. Ordo Ab Chao means constant Chao and some future hope of eventually Ordo.

[BumpyRideC]

guys, please shut it. if you can read Chinese, then you would know the interview is saying how Americans are paranoid about chinese having ASBM. But the Chinese interviewer was saying that we Chinese don't have that technology. Westerners please stop this xenophobia please.

[JCitr7]

The chinese smell blood in the water. They see the U.S. getting weaker and weaker. Don't think for one minute they wouln't throw a sucker-knockout punch if they were confident they could get away with it. They are Godless, shrewed, and evil. So don't tell me this is " defensive technology."

[MH40]

@JCitr7 lol americans, u paranoid bro?

[decimated550]

@JCitr7 - Godless? so is america. Shrewd? Anybody has the right to be shrewd. Evil? I guess so, they're not too big on the health and freedom of its citizens, or its ruined environment. But they are big and bad and i hate to say it but might makes right, and philosophers can debate the good/bad of it later.

I do'nt like china either, i hate them, but the american century is on the way out, we should find ways to cope with it, mentally, economically, militarily.

[doso1958]

@decimated550 About the Military, but this is direct impact to economy aka-power. Consider this little "simple" fact. The United States "Navy"-just the Navy-controls the oceans in the world. Whether it's a junk in the South China sea, a dhow off the African coast a tanker in the Persian gulf or a cabin cruiser in the Caribbean, every ship in the world moves under the eyes of just the "Navy" of America.

[decimated550]

@doso1958 - do you know that for a fact? then how do ships of the coast of somalia get hijacked? How do drug smuggling ships sneak into america? We are not invincible, never have been, and are not now. I wish we were, believe me. We project a lot of power on the seas, but that didn't do much for a ten year fight in afghanistan and iraq

[herrHorace]

Why all the big fuss? I suspect it is because of how poorly briefed you guys are on the subject. This is purely a defensive technology, it is not meant to be a belligerent or an offensive weapon. The missile have a range of 2000km and can be deployed from landbased systems, that is, if a US carrier group get too close to china the can either use it as a deterrent or use it to launch an attack on the group.

[bjd020695]

The stupid Chinese must be slowing my internet connection so I can't watch it! Damn Commies!

[hayggg]

怎么全是外国人啊，都看的懂？

[misoislamic]

They say these should be available by mid June, when your friendly local fireworks stand opens. These may cost as much as $7.00 each, but they will throw in some free bottle rockets and punks! I am already hearing that one stand will have them on the 3 for 1 sale!

[preali]

I think its funny how they depict the American Navy, it seems there is a little Sino racism going on. They are the serious military taking on the dilettante US navy. Can't wake up the commander who wants to sleep through the missile attack.

I hope this never comes about there would be catastrophic loss of life on both sides.

[guninthewater]

Wow, that cartoon was nuuuuuuuuuuuubs.....

[GodHatesPortugal]

I dont blame them...JEWnited States of America (USSA) and its anglo colonies are a danger to Mankind.

[misoislamic]

@GodHatesPortugal

Right on Man! We all know they control all the firework stands and own black cat fireworks. I hate it when they don't even give you free punks anymore!

[xxyankssju]

China brings the lulz, try it and see what happens.

[rentonsentinel]

LOL...  who would fight China using CVNs when they could use SSBNs?

[pm2424]

Can anybody translate the last bit about Carrier air defense vs a missile ?

[datamata]

I expected better animation from China. I guess the budget was low.

[DoctorTouk]

Maybe both countries could take some of their military budget and spend it on basic needs like food, housing, and education...?

[ROBdeLIS]

@DoctorTouk They tried that. It was called the Great Leap Forward.

[mphRagnarok]

@DoctorTouk

pull your naive head out of your ass.

this is simple two player simultaneous game theory. whoever takes money off hard assets is at a disadvantage.

pulling money out of weapons only works if there is no incentive to screw the opponent by staying in weapons when he decides to build schools.

but there is huge incentive to have better weapons, since it leads to larger influence in global matters. because seriously, the fear of american military power is what keeps the world in check

[DoctorTouk]

@mphRagnarok : What you are describing is the classical way of thought for as long as man has been strong enough to swing a club/sword/nuke. However, are was past that era? Other countries (i.e. Norway, Finland) etc. are doing very well by having minimal defense budgets and instead focusing on universal health care and free education.. the citizens are healthy and smart. Everyone wins.. it's the opposite of fear-driven politics.

[decimated550]

@DoctorTouk

I saw a 20/20 episode on Brazil's rise as an economic power. And it does it without a military agenda. At the end of the segment, the businessman being interviewed said "War, military? We Brazilians don't want to fight wars anywhere. At the end of the day we just want to go to the beach".

Amazing, i thought, a country would rather make trading partners than engage in stupid and wasteful wars. The wars are costing America about $10,000 a second. I doubt our economy earns that much

[harlequin2262]

@DoctorTouk

They aren't targets, though. They keep to themselves. Nobody knows about them.

And observe how aggressive the Chinese are about their sea-space, and oil reserves. US does the same thing. Scandinavia doesn't have the same challenges.

[Vebinz]

@mphRagnarok

"the fear of american military power is what keeps the world in check"

I'm not sure on what basis you write this?

No one is being kept "in check" today. Through-out history there have been countless super-power empires, and they've never really managed to keep war in check. In fact, they are themselves usually the biggest war-mongerers.

[762full]

Japan and South Korea re both (conventionally) stronger however, though Japan could have nuclear weapons within a short time span.

[mmysama]

Japan used to have a halfway successful nuclear weapons program during WWII. The only reason it did'nt succeed was for lack of fissile material.

[762full]

It wasnt exactly 50% lol, it was more like on the drawing board, but there was certainly work being done on a nuclear program.

The germans did actually make a nuclear device, and detonated it in Hessen I believe, but were taken out before a bomb could be assembled. They transferred what they had to Japan just before losing.

The Japanese program 2day is highly advanced, and can make a number of weapons, the reason being the threat from North Korea and maybe even China.

[762full]

The Chinese are cute and funny

[chrobrego1]

Good grief, good way to turn China into the world's largest desert. What ignorant militarism.