Added: 4 years ago
From: CG4TV
Views: 218,295
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (553)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Chemtrails is a devil

  • damn .. that is already out? and i just got a vacum cleaner

  • yay! 1 done! 1,403,263,219 to go! :DDD

  • I got nano bots. They repair my cochlear and change the frequencies regularly.

  • Comment removed

  • bitch eachother out on youtube. this solves so many problems.

  • @dantheman52420 :Amen! That's the worse part about youtube. Almost every stupid mutha is on here throwing stones & the ones doing the worse bashing, they always feel that they are always 100% right or always need something to prove to the masses when in reality they're just struggling to uphold their own self esteem.

  • @edbstrung

    For some reason they feel like they have some honor to uphold or some view to change. I can run around on the internet screaming that I'm 52 years old and like to have sex with small children. Nothing happens. (I'm not btw)

  • Looks like biological warfare to me.

  • Can't wait for full immersion VR! 8D

  • I want to learn how to harness this soon. I'm in 9th grade and can only speculate all the uses this has in education and virtual reality, as well as expanding human life cycles! But I have no detailed knowledge of how to use the technology or create it...

  • My neurons are augmented

  • brainwashing...

  • Geezus!!!

  • cant wait till nano suit XD going to scare the shit out of my parents LOL stealth engadget

  • STEALTH ENGADGET maximum armor!

  • Yeah!!! all the way for transhuman!!!

  • wtf i thought there would be voice over

  • @sufeewi shit happens. get over it.

  • One day we will be so advanced that we will make all of our own body's into fully functioning prosthetic body's and will allow us as a race to live for a longer time, maybe forever. That is if there isn't another world after our organic body's die. That would be creepy if you knew you died and your prosthetic body was still moving around talking to your friends and family as if it (or you) didn't know.

  • @DeadHappyFilm I think a lot of people don't realize that many current generations may live nearly indefinitely. Indeed, people born in the 1970s (some say 1960s) may be the first to do so. Age is an engineering problem, and by 2040-2050 we will be pretty darn close to solving and then reversing this problem. Before that, we will roll out treatments to drastically prolong life. A lot of this will be thanks to nanobots. Kinda odd to think about, huh?

  • @lastoneinspace Yeah, you seem to have read Ray Kurzweil's books. But we are currently in a tense political and economic situation. Even when we will have this technology available, how can you guarantee, that the mid-class will be able to afford it? We still have a long way to go. The next few years will determine if we make it out of the crisis peacefully or through war.

  • WITCHCRAFT I TELLS YA!

  • With this, any schoolkid could be an Einstein. Imagen what a scenario it would be when a hyperintelligent generation comes into the workforce. But then the ethics would screw it all, because there would be people telling us sciencefreaks not to implant robots in young childrens' brains.

  • @ByabyaChannel you can increase the efficiency and speed of the brain but not your intelligence. if you were dumb before than you will be dumb after an implant but you may think faster but thats not a guarantuee for a more intelligent outcome

  • @ecreif These nanobots will be able to make neurons that were previously unable to function properly, into functioning neurons again. This kind of treatment would essentially cure ailments of the brain like schizophrenia. What exactly is the difference between increasing the functions of the brain and intelligence? Is intelligence not a measure of how quickly and effectively our brain processes data and sends signals?

  • @TheKillershade i would say intelligence is the skill to come to right and good conclusions and to be able to use knowledge in an intelligent way and to be creative. Those are skills that are quite uneffected by better functioning neurons. For these skills neurons have to be arranged in the right way not just being faster

  • @TheKillershade There is a difference between restoring function of an existing but faulty neuron . . . and generating functionally correct new connections from scratch. Especially if we are trying to treat an organism that is well beyond the stage of embryonic development. I think it is a bit of a stretch to assert that this one thing could "cure" complex pathologies such as schizophrenia.

  • our heads would be heavier though, lololol

  • Comment removed

  • Souls-selling religious animals abusing nanotechnology military weapons.

  • Don't know where you guys get religion from this but stop. It's just dumb. You can't prove or disprove religion based on any tools or measuring devices so just believe what you wan't to believe and leave each other alone.

    @LionGoddess Yes it is very dangerous. I have been reading about a nanobot being developed in California that can destroy any cell. They are making this to cure cancer and diseases but in the wrong hands it can be used to kill people. It's very interesting.

  • @Shackdaddy1337 We would leave religious people alone if they would stop bothering us, stop trying to use and create laws to force everyone to live according to their ways, and stop trying to prevent progress of science because it is "against their beliefs". So it is not dumb, but believing in fairy tales created by men in the bronze age that have no proof of being true which presently is called religion is dumb.

  • @firespinguy The only science that religion has meddled with was stem cell research. Other than that religion hasn't affected science at all. And yes, it is dumb because you have absolutely 0 proof that their religion exists (same the other way too btw). If you did believe only in science then you would first get some concrete evidence (which is impossible) before you openly decide the validity of an idea. Otherwise you are just acting like a bigot - NOT a man/woman of science.

  • @Shackdaddy1337 Learn some history, religion perpetually repressed science for centuries. I'm also not sure what you're getting at in saying we have a lack of concrete proof. Sure if we want to chase our tails inside Plato's cave forever then we could take that view, or we could accept our perception of reality as relatively accurate and go from there. This effectively being the founding principle of science.

  • @Shackdaddy1337 religion has fucked up science secondarily. it wasn't the main reason for the crusades, or any of the other "believe or die" campaigns, but burning down entire civilizations, destroying thousands of irreplaceable artifacts and scientific notes, prototypes and the like. Religion has fucked this world up more than you realize.

  • never get nannobots it could fall into the wrong hands.. we know there's terrorists why even make this? its as dumb as when we created the A bomb duh just don't

  • @LionGoddess1

    These technologies will be eventually developped by someone, so better us than anyone else. At least we'll have time time and means to create countermeasures

    Unless you manage to put a worldwide ban (protip - it's impossible) someone with a more lax approach to morality will.

  • MAXIMUM STRENGTH!

  • @gamerman001 Cloak engaged :)

  • @gamerman001 Nano vision enabled

  • Uggg the whole joint is already wired up!

  • Society should blame themselves for allowing the governments to do this... I mean the answers are everywhere people are just so dumb and focused on the BS in the media that they dont find answers. Now we care about our Ipod as a lifeline of music. The internet as a lifeline for socializing. a television to blindfold us and a cellphone that tracks where you are at all times. Might as well marry a Fridge... People love technology more than people or life in general. You will deny this. Too bad

  • @pr34ch87 Why should I give a damn about other people? I have been self sustaining for YEARS! Every time I am with some person I am inconvenienced 12 fold. I don't get any satisfaction from being around people, and what is wrong with a controlling government? They are there to protect you, and one of the most efficient ways is to control your people.

  • Daaaaaamn I'll have to study neurology after I finish computer engineering.

  • Seriously, you are all organic machines, nothing else.. it makes no difference what medium your personality exists on. I can not wait until we achieve the technology to augment our intelligence with microscopic machines. I mean seriously, who wouldn't want their brain augmented with a quantum computer? Mankind in 30-40 years will be able to create universes inside of a lab. We will fit the very definition of your silly gods in your silly books. Grow up and accept it.

  • if the nano bots take over a human brain, the human might not be themselves because its no longer their neurons, think about this for a moment, this could cause something disastrous if it were to be spilled from a bottle onto the streets....then its only a matter of time.

  • I do not agree with this. I'm sick of scientists wanting us to become machine-like fucking robots. It is disturbing and ruining nature. Fuck humans >:(

  • @MEareCAT: there's always a good and a bad side... (my opinion) if WE humans weren't so selfish and hunger for power we wouldn't have to worry about being brainwashed and turn into half machine/half human... cause this technology can sure be used for healing, and fighting terminal deseases.

  • @MEareCAT

    This is our future, I'm sorry you can't accept the fact that we as a species must take our evolution into our own hands.

  • Disturbing the natural order of life is not a good idea!Drugs, side effects,injury ,metal plates uncomfortable and painful.Human beings are not robots!The long term effects / affects may be catastrophic.I'd rather move on to the next journey.People with pace makers cannot afford to participate in certain activities.This is dangerous and careless!

  • @2blakandbold

    and those same people with pacemakers would be dead without medical technology.

    You pick: limited activities or death

  • @IxFrozenTombxI Limited activity to some is a prolonged death also Long term effects and effects.I'm not trying to denounce every modern day medical discovery but there should be restrictions and alternatives for some of these so called revolutionary practices.

  • @IxFrozenTombxI in addition" if there were not so many d*** chemicals in our food and water"perhaps modern medicine would not be in such dire need. If "we" humans would take preventions to have better health and if science was secondary instead of mandatory.When i was coming up, I barely ever became sick.We didn't have to go to the doctor, we had home remedies for just about everything and they worked.I'm not suggesting science is the problem but the abuse of it is publicly and privately!

  • Wouldnt that take about 100 billion nanobots to have all the neurons replaced?

    And that would be awesome then, the brain would be immortal since it wont die of age.

  • This will be great for alzheimers treatment. 

  • @newmanfrigan alzheimers, i don't think you fully get the gravity of this. electronics are faster than neurones. Thoughts could be potentially faster. this could effect your perception of time, 1 second becoming 5 or six or a few minutes.

  • Woooooaah! It's beautiful. Grey Goo Sydrome here we come! : )

  • owned

  • *Sigh...*

    Why do I feel the need to comment on every Science-Religion trollwar that pops up?

    Religion itself isn't important; it's the assholes interpreting religion into bullshit like war-for-God-çause-he's-totally­-cool-with-genocide, et cetera.

    So, if we never had people like Urban II, Innocent III, most of the other medieval Popes and ultraconservatives, Bin Laden the extremists running Iran and so on and so forth, and had more progressives, I'd be trolling from a holographic PC with my mind.

  • Religion fucked up 900 years of science

  • @sufeewi but science fucked up the world? all you geeks just need to fucking stop with all this shit you are really not that fucking smart and dont know what the fuck you are makeing fucking kids with no friends trying to do something with there worthless life, and all you will end up doing is destroying the world looking for some sort of acceptance to why you are such a wierd little prick with no friends.

  • @cmxkiller fuck off

  • @cmxkiller Science lets you be the little keyboard warrior you aspire to be

  • @cmxkiller Hypocrite. You're on here too.

  • @cmxkiller I want you to know, that your message was very inappropriate, and you'll never know when will those geeks save you in a difficult situation. And by the way: everyones life is just as worthless as the others, cause we have to point in life, everyone finds it for him/herself. Destroying the current "world" would be a good plan though, we could try to create a better one after that... (right now the humanity is acting like a controlled swarm: sex>money>humanity)

  • @cmxkiller Actually yes and no, science as you know it is not the only science it is the tip of the ice berg. You think High intelligence scientists by now have not come up with a barrier between what we know know and passed it? please they have..... but that has not stopped them fro doing all they have, that hasd not stopped the NWO,illuminati and other control freaks from ruling the world. If you have anyone to blame it's the government and people hiding the truth.

  • @sufeewi i agree... mankind would probably be millinea ahead of our time if religious radicals werent so damn pushy with religeion... theres nothin wrong with believing in somthing but when you force it down societies throat so that people cant do certain things in science.... its wrong. their just afraid of being proven wrong.

  • @sufeewi Science was first developed by religeon. Atheists should really explore history before making asinine statements

  • @NOISLAMINUSA Religion can perhaps just go molest itself

  • @NOISLAMINUSA Besides that i ment christianity fucked up science

  • @sufeewi fuck religion! it pisses me off

  • @sufeewi science fucks up 12000 yrs of religion ^^

  • @lakmilis sorry if im wrong but i was told only 900

  • Comment removed

  • @rajusman

    Astrology pioneered from religion, astronomy pioneered from philosophy then was formalized as a science thousands of years later.

  • @rajusman neither one is related to the other but they interact with each other who knows ur dog could of pissed off ur gf so she is taking it out on u being a bitch... might want to choose a different area of study cause your thinking is very narrow I would suggest u being a hair stylist or something lol

  • Comment removed

  • @rajusman regardless of what my masters is in doesnt mean you know what the fuck youre talking about.. you musta of just started your course or not very good about what you read

  • Comment removed

  • @sufeewi Its over 9000!!!!

  • @poonhounds2 whatever i was talking about some christain bs or whatever has anything to do with jesus and that wasent 9000 years ago

  • @sufeewi That was because of the people not the religion itself.

  • @Lkjhgf5482 its because of people that believe in religion

  • @Lkjhgf5482 People who were brainwashed and motivated by dangerous and stupid ideas which we collectively call religion.

    Fuck religion, all religious people ought to be banned from engaging in any scientific research and prevented from using any kind of medical technology. That is for us sinners thank you very much.

  • @spacecowboy95

    You are a selfentitled little prick that probably never contributed anything to science.

    So who the hell are you to jugde on others?

    Also: Do you even know how many nurses have been educated in monasteries? Do you even have an idea how many hospitals have been built by religious orders?

    Damnit. Get the hell out of here and carry your insane believes elsewhere.

    Science doesn't need to pay back on anyone.

  • @13x1x20 Yeah and how many lives have they destroyed during the crusade eras? more than the sick.

    You're just mad because science is on the breach of proving their theories and hypothesis. And what has religion done? worship. And it's all science, they use science to make the ACTUAL cures for sick people. where nurses just cure one little cut.

  • @EthernalExhile

    I'm sick of hearing crusades this and crusades that.

    If you honestly believe religion was the reason for the crusade you probably also believe the first world war was solely fought because Gavrilo Princip shot the austrian crown prince.

    A hint: That's bullshit. Of course it gave people the chance to start a war but the real reasons where as always economical. Same goes for the crusades and the two power blocs in the medieval world (that where both fucking unstable).

  • @13x1x20 to get you feed news about crusade era.

    You're even more retarded than i thought. A crusade means a HOLY war, in which many religions in order to apply their religious beliefs on other people they fought by the sword. Killing a lot of people. Involving Christianity and other religious beliefs, If you didn't get taught World History please take the class, you're making a total brute of yourself. Fucking idiot.

  • @EthernalExhile

    "1/100 nurses [...] Lego and CoD [...] Holy war [...] take history class again [...] "

    Are you.... are you twelve? Because this crap sure sounds like you are.

    I'll not discuss with an idiot any longer unless you are at least prepared to read up some stuff.

    Read up on the crusades and read up on the Sisters of Mercy and maybe some other orders.

    AND FOR CHRISTS SAKE STOP ACTING AS IF I SAID ANYTHING AGAINST SCIENCE!

    Because I didn't you miserable idiot.

  • @13x1x20 You're the one that must be twelve because you like legos and cod. You tried to imply your religious beliefs on me. cunt face. and i don't bother reading the rest of your 4 comments because they're all shit and jibberish, with your poor sense of replies and miserable comebacks. and you try to imply your silly comments on how you're a victim, stop trying to make yourself a victim because you wont win this argument. Don't change up your opinions. idiot

  • Comment removed

  • @EthernalExhile

    Oh and just to give you a little incentive to use your brain (you wont - but a man can dream, right?):

    You said I tried to imply my religious beliefs on you.

    Where?

    Copy that line where I did that. I'd be interested.

    And don't come up with some retarded answer like "hurrrr generally!" because that's a lie. And if you actually read the stuff i wrote (which you didn't hoho) you'd see that.

    Plain and simple.

  • @EthernalExhile

    And then I say: "Well actually religion was only the justification for the powerful (as so often). The real reason for the crusades where two power blocs forming in the medieval world, economic reasons etc"

    And your answer is no more but "NO YOU ARE GAY AND WRONG! GO ITO SCHOOL AGAIN OLOLOL XDDDDD!"

    Am I the one with no opinion here?

    I don't think so.

    But you know what you are?

    A dazzled undifferentiated poor miserable fuck.

    Emphasis on undifferentiated.

  • @EthernalExhile

    You know why i came to this video?

    I'm a computer scientist with a strong interest in Neuroinformatics. And if it is possible I'll make this my field of work within the next 2 or 3 years.

    But you know what pisses me off? These fuck retarded Science vs Religion comments.

    Because both sides are fucking retarded as the least part of people having these discussions are actually well taught in science OR theological/philosophical theory

  • @EthernalExhile

    For me Science is science.

    And religion is religion.

    There is no reason to aggressively interfere with each other.

    But even if it is like that I at least have it in my heart to see over the misdoings of one faction and inform myself what they really did.

    You on the other hand are hopeless.

    I try to understand.

    You try to judge.

    You are not better than any fucking fundamentalist.

  • @EthernalExhile

    And you know what's so great about fundamentalism?

    You can always blame the other side (or people reasoning with the other side) as the big fiendish demons while claiming your believe is the only pure and true on the whole world and feeling like you are always right.

    Fits into the behavior you've shown so far. Funny, isn't it?

  • Comment removed

  • @EthernalExhile

    Also: In how far does this lessen the work of nurses in let's say WW2? Or in how far does it lessen the fact that religious orders built hospitals?

    Another hint: It doesn't.

    Get your head out of your arse and stop blaming all of your worldly problems on a single group of people, disregarding 50% of what they did you insecure windbag.

    Oh and by the way:

    I'm an academic.

  • @13x1x20 You're talking about WAR mate. And what? 1/100 of each nurse was raised by religion. Hospitals? haha If it weren't for science there would be no hospitals. and we would have millions of people die every day. You have no opinion here hence you like LEGOS and play COD. so yea you idiot think before you even try to contradict.

    oh and by the way:

    I'm a 10th grader.

  • @EthernalExhile

    Also what the flying fuck is your point?

    Someone say "HURRR RELIGION IS DA DEVIL!" (which is funny somehow)

    And I say "You see.. actually there are many good things coming from religious order, like hospitals and poor relief" (btw the sisters of mercy give out a free breakfast to the poor people of, i think it was vienna, everyday but on a sunday - how does that accord to your mad believes)

    And then you come and say "NOOO YOUS N IDIOT! CRUSADES N SHIT! LOL XDDDD"

  • @Lkjhgf5482 cough* ppl created religion so yes its the people

  • @sufeewi yah imagine how fast we would excel in science and technology if religion was around

  • If Christ hadn't have come we'd be killing each other over this right now.

  • Looks painless

  • @imthaman1234 If that's sarcastic, it shouldn't be.

  • The giant squid "The sentinel" in The Matrix the movie by Carrie ANN Mose is an alternative portrait of this nanobot. And this nanobot also looks like football, which probally one of reasons Squid is so rediciously famous in 2010 world football game, and AI super comuter can mimic(another movie title again) nanobots act like neurotoxin. The nanobots neurotoxin could be in use against global civilian now, movie The Happening is an alternative portrait of smart dust neurotoxin.

  • More than thousands of Nanobots like this video which wirelessly connected to AI super computer will create an Artificial Neural Network(ANN) beside human natural neural network, some insiders call that Approximate Nearest Neighbor(ANN) of human natural neural network, and when human eyes are equppied by those nanbots, operation system of AI super computer can see Anime News Network(ANN) from targets. The nanobot can be inhaled through airborne smart dust.

  • this is crepy shit

  • This video is an infringement and in violation of all copyright laws.

    All of the clips are copies of my animations and ideas.The stingers, peepers were inveted and created by myself between 1991 and 2000 in illustrations and 3d animations.

    I created the artificial braincells in 2002 and the illustration was published on the foresight institute website.

    Please remove these videos or mention correct copyright.

    Thank you.

    Erik Viktor

  • @erikviktor1 if you believe that this is infringing on your copyright, you should file a dmca takedown notice.

  • @erikviktor1 I just took a look at your "Stingers and Peppers" and they have nothing to do with this =/

  • @civili5 "Peepers", rather.

  • bstter just in the left hemisphere

  • I don't think religion is causing us not to have this right now, though it doesn't help. It's probably the lack of interest and support of science by the general public. Most people aren't that interested in major breakthroughs in science and technology. They find most of the far-reaching dreams and goals of scientists to be "creepy". Unfortunately, movies and television instill pessimism to miraculously world-changing technologies, and the mass media rarely covers scientific breakthroughs.

  • the neural implant links to the internet could easily be done in the far past with swarms of nanobots

  • If you had morgellons disease you'd be wanting to outlaw this kind of stuff as fast as you could... believe me, I know.

    hugs ~~ bannanny

  • @9N8X you're wrong

  • La religion est censé etre quelque chose d'heureux. Alors pourquoi les religieux empêchent l'évolution en demandants les gens de se privés.

    Religion is supposed to be something happy. So why keep the religious evolution by asking people to private. Sorry It's google translation.

  • shame man invented religion, we would all be better off

  • I for one welcome our nanobot masters

  • is this real or animated?

  • @1MrBunny its CGI, meaning its animated, so yes it is animated however this is very possible with extensive research. In 50 years, i see this to be used.

  • i want to have over 9000 years.

  • @selearemus over nine thousand!

  • @Rockyzach88 WHAT 9000?!!

  • If humans made it, then it's natural or organic. Humanity is a natural occurrence, just like everything else in nature. Therefore, pesticides, artificial growth hormones, and skyscrapers are all 100% organic and natural.

  • lol @ our man made hell...

  • @Tuiamaa Lol @ your stupidity.

  • Why every science video on youtube is where the religious people come to spread gods hate.

  • I can't wait the time when we already will use kinda stuffs like this one!

  • this is abomination how dare they play god how dare the

    is say we destroy science and go back to the time when the earth was flat and the sun mover around the earth.

    how ungrateful religious people are the they love taking what science has to offer and still try to criticise it

  • new sin

  • no u

  • Lol, don't bother discussing with alexrj2. He is a Jehovah's Witness - that says all.

    Science for the win!

  • i'm going to have to agree, religion has held us back . Ever watch that episode from family guy w/ Stewie & Bryan traveling to the future with-ought religion, that's probably where we would be .

  • @zarinaalarice now IM guna disagree im cristian yet I fully suport robotic nerons and time tavel the only part I dont belive in is the big bang I mean everything from aleins to robo neorons and all that stuff like swarm bots I like new technology so im guna disagree

  • PLEASE O PLEASE O PLEASE O PLEASE!!!!!

    /I'd forget my head if it weren't attached to my neck.

  • Okay, for whoever just said this is evil, and to all those who think Christians hate science:

    I'd just like to say, that I am a Christian, and I think this is really cool. I can tell you that this doesn't violate any of the Christian God's commandments. Whoever said it does is SEVERELY misinformed.

    Just thought I'd clear that up.

  • @Freddy3740

    Just because you're christian and think this is "cool" doesn't give any more credit to your backwards religion and how it holds the world back

  • The People that don'T believe this are the kind of people that was stil thinking that we will never be able to go in space

    Same that think UFO don'T exist in a bilion of galaxy

    Same that think we cant Mentaly Heal or Control Energy !

    In the Name of Science Nothing is Impossible til you find It Nooblet !

  • though there is one thing that is true in a certain religon(not even sure if it came from a religon that involves ying-yang??)

    anything that can help humanity, can also destory it.

    anything used for good can be equally used as bad.

    If you think about it this way...

    guns for protecting/ guns for killing

    drugs for healing/ drugs for harm

    a king that lead the people/ a king that controls the people

    nanobots also apply to this rule.

    The greater the good, the greater the bad.

  • The future is near.

    Amezing, it happen so fast.

  • Our future has arrived Thanks for uploading

  • If religion didn't exist we'd be doing this by now

  • @9N8X  um nope kuz this still need more devoloping and there is a god no matter how much technology grows kuz he came here some how and something created this world probably the big bang it self was god its that what brought us here then takeits name off(big bang) and name it god

  • @9N8X and many will complain in why the world is cruel, bitching and killing themselves for it.

  • @9N8X although i agree that religion is a huge hurdle in human growth as it retards the brain, why do you think it is responsible for this technology to come forth?

  • @screenflicker1

    not only that but it's promoted

    homophobia,racism,sexism,etc. etc.

  • @9N8X Why do you say that?

  • @Freddy3740

    Religion has suppressed science.

  • @9N8X Enough to say that we would have the ability to bipass dead neurons using nano technology? What else? That we would be able to travel through time? That we would be colonising different planets? That we would have found the cure to cancer?

    Even if religion has suppressed science (evidence of this you have failed to supply me with, by the way) as much as you said it has, there would be no way to prove that we would have this technology. I'm surprised at the ignorance of your claim.

  • @Freddy3740

    "Even if religion has suppressed science (evidence of this you have failed to supply me with, by the way)"

    -catholic church, Galileo. one of many many examples.

  • @types10000 So you're saying that by suppressing Galileo, the Catholic Church managed to prevent us from having robotic neurons?

  • @Freddy3740

    I think this chart best represents what im saying about the impact of Chistianity:

    mediumdevice[.]com/images/dark­ages.gif

  • @9N8X if religion didn't exist we'd still eating each-other brains. So, still no nonobots, maybe some weal and fire discovery :). But also, this idea, is no blasphemy at all,it is purely evolution. The Christianity didn't kill the evolution of technology but people who prospered from this braking of evolution. In the end, the science , evolution of men and God will win against of this lacking of inspiration, named "Religion"