I told you before not to share your videos on my page. There is absolutely no benefit in the topics you indulge in or in the videos you upload, such as the deceitful questions posed to the scholars in your uploads, that your crew uses to throw individuals "off the manhaj". Even in Ramadan your still obsessed with the subject of warning against individuals...Sh. Fawzan's advice to those with this illness, "Allah (swt) has not made you a watcher over the people".
No one has ever claimed there are no classifications of sects, groups, etc. The conclusion you reached from this video is ridiculous, there are even those who choose to classify themselves such as yourself, so I don't see what is your issue. The purpose of this advise is for those whose main purpose is to classify the Muslims and have gone to extremes in this matter. One look at your page and one will conclude that you are one of those individuals who have gone to extremes.
@ChechenMaga - why don't you prove that your own comments are anything but stupid by defending this "shaykh"? takfir is an obligation in Islam and setting the principles of imaan and kufr is what all scholars and religious students must do. you cited a contradiction in the words of this shaykh (not hard to do with neo-salafis). research him further, and u see his own takfir in the form of calling the Mujahideen khawarij (something that only benefits the apostate rulers). jazakAllah khair
@ChechenMaga - yes, the khawarij are the khawarij, which is why you should go back and study who they were. khawarij groups exist today, but they are small and few between. the rulers are closer in attribute to them (but still not khawarij), and they hide behind this term to slander the Mujahideen in protection of their own evil thrones. they have set themselves up as partners with Allah. finally, the ones who are blowing up Muslims are the kuffar (w/ assistance from these tyrant rulers).
@ChechenMaga - calling someone khawarij is a form of takfir as it implies that they are not of the Ummah but rather, they are of the "dogs of hell". it isn't a direct form of takfir, but the implication is the same. at least we are open and honest and direct about takfir - which is upon the tyrant rulers and those who directly aid them on account of their setting up themselves or others as partners with God...and on account of aiding the polytheists against the Muslims in war (an act of kufr).
salam aleikom.you guys drive me nuts with your comments :)) why dont you just study arabic and take the essence from arabic books not english translations.and good points Mr1fox9...
to clarify the mistakes and explain what is correct - often requires one to label. if something that goes clearly against Islam becomes associated with a certain group or manhaj or whatever…then clarifying those mistakes will not be possible (relatively speaking) without associating the group's name or label.
i'm not sure what the Shaykh was saying or meant in 0:49...but without a doubt, the biggest "tahazzubt" here is the term "saudi arabia" itself, and the nationalism that exists all over the Islamic world today. he is saudi, he is pakistani, he is icelandic - yuck! this has caused even greater harm to Ummah of Muhammad saaws as compared to smaller, dawah-based religous parties. jazakAllah khair
no akhee you are wrong, maybe it hasnt been this extreme, but a sort of tribalism/nationalism has always existed, this is the nature of human beings. if we were in 1 khilaafah we would divide ourself into areas and tribes still. The worst fitna to hit us Muslims is the emergence and spread of deviant groups within our religion, do you think Allaah will give us victory while we folow a path OTHER than what He has sent?
@JihadOfTheSoul - 1 of 5 - no akhi, it has not been this extreme. but there is a difference between having tribes and nations...and putting those tribes and nations high above the religion of Islam. Islam came to unite the tribes and nations (not replace them) as the Quran testifies to. so long as Islam is the law of the land, it is ok if we describe ourselves based on our family or tribal or ethnic or even national origin. today however - the nation states that exist were created by the kuffar
@JihadOfTheSoul - 2 of 5 - the borders and boundaries were set by the european colonialists specifically to divide us, rule over us, exploit our resources, and prevent the Khalifah. the laws and constitutions of these nations are man-made (even if some Islamic laws are applied here and there). thus, it not just a matter of being a little extreme, it is a matter of kufr and shirk! it is a matter of blind following and brain washing!! in fact, the brain washing has become so severe that…
@JihadOfTheSoul - 3 of 5 - some average people put their allegiance to rulers who gave aid and asylum to Islam's worst enemies! they oppress their fellow Muslims (who are of different tribal and national origins) as well as their own fellow citizens and neighbors - all for a short worldy gain (and in what is known as the national interest). putting the national interest above the Islamic interest is to setup a partner with Allah. this is clear. and brother TheMuslim0 explained other issues...
@JihadOfTheSoul - 4 of 5 - Allah will not give us victory as long as we divide ourselves in ways that please the kuffar, remain enslaved to those borders and boundaries, and become proud and arrogant with regards to "Asabiyyah". Most average Muslims don't have the knowledge to really differentiate between these deep, hardcore religious parties (all of who state that their purpose is dawah). and so they don't know about the various mistakes or deviations or bidah or whatever.
@JihadOfTheSoul - 5 of 5 - we as students of knowledge do know those things, and they are important - but we also need to occasionally take our heads out of our books and look around and assess the reality of the current situation. thereby, we see that the bigger divisions within the Ummah today are in regards to the forbidden types of Asabiyyah more so than religious parties or aqeedah labels of matters of fiqh, etc. w'salam
isnt Salah al Fawzaan the same person who praises the Saudi police in rounding up and torturing those muslims who traveled to Iraq to participate in the Jihad against the Rawafidh and the occupation.If this is the case then i dont think this man is worthy to even give advice on Khula
@easyonetwothree Well, i guess then, if we arent allowed to call brothers takfiriyyun, jaamiyyah and so on then we shouldnt be allowed to call brother madkhalis or madaakhilah.
Akhi, you have a lot of growing up to...I would appreciate if you do not share your out of context videos on my channel, that contain ridiculous titles, and pose misleading questions to the scholars.
Isn't is important to know the methods of incoorect groups and who they are though to separate right from wrong, I mean thats why we separrate from teh extreme shias and shias in general.
Isn't it important like to categorize wrong to know truth and what to avoid, I mean the Propeht peace and blessigns eb upon him came witht he natural truth and a refuatioan to teh falsehoods andc their groups so yea.
@SFAvfx Sorry brother, didn't mean to insult you or bother you, may Allâh bless you for your good niyah. I hope I one day grow up as you hehe =P. Salamu 'alaykum akhi wa ikhwan.
@SFAvfx Shaykh al-Fawzan: "to cathegorize the people into different groups to spread enmity is not allowed. But to do it to show what is right and what is wrong, is correct." (al-Muhadharat tape 176)
Akhi If you're going to upload such a fatwâ, then it would be better not to exclude other fatâwâ from the same shaykh, in sha Allah I hope you understand and put in action.
@easyonetwothree - No one gives a damn what a mouthpiece of the taaghoot has to say. this shaykh has committed clear acts of kufr based upon his statements you yourself have uploaded of his. this shaykh is a defender of the idol-worshipers - nothing less!! So what value are any of his fatwas, or any of his statements (with regards to actionable Islamic standpoints)?? may Allah destroy the neo-salifis, the taghoot they are enslaved to, their scholars, and their mouthpieces (which would be you).
@easyonetwothree brother its not good because its hurtful... (from experience i know!) maybe to you its ok and sounds good, but to whom its directed at its really hurtful, and in Islam you should not speak hurtful words to your brother's and sisters in Islam... so if you are doing such a thing its not good for you your only earning bad deeds...
@saytuna2 - I warn you against the likes of the neo-salafis like easyonetwothree. they are not our "brothers" but rather, the enemies within...the biggest fitnah within Ahlul Sunnah wa Jammah today.
@saytuna2 - Wallahi (I swear by Allah), the neo-salaifs/medkhalis are our clear and open enemies. aside from being secterian (how many of the sects are in hellfire?), they ally with the rulers (i.e. the taghut) and slander the Mujahideen (calling them khawarij), and deceive the average Muslims with regards to what is going on in our Ummah today. they have endowed a culture of blind-following of palace scholars and refutation over every little mistake anyone makes! may Allah destroy them.
@saytuna2 - also brother, just look up "fawzaan khawarij" and u fill find his pronouncements against Shaykh bin Laden (ra) and his defense of al-saudia. i described in some comments below to someone else the issue of the khawarij. the reality is that this person (and other medkhalis) bow before the taghut, slander the best of our Ummah, and remain silent about the shirk and fitna of nationalism. so be wary of them, and never trust them (even if you take the good while leaving the bad). w'salam
can someone tell me that what is the difference between people who are called qutubi salafis and those who are called suroori salafis....?
pakistaniofpakistan 1 month ago
@pakistaniofpakistan First we need to establish what exactly a qutbi and a suroori is.
SwedishAthari 1 week ago
@pakistaniofpakistan No such thing as Qutbi and Surori.
TheMuslim0 6 days ago
@easyonetwothree CONT.
I told you before not to share your videos on my page. There is absolutely no benefit in the topics you indulge in or in the videos you upload, such as the deceitful questions posed to the scholars in your uploads, that your crew uses to throw individuals "off the manhaj". Even in Ramadan your still obsessed with the subject of warning against individuals...Sh. Fawzan's advice to those with this illness, "Allah (swt) has not made you a watcher over the people".
SFAvfx 6 months ago 2
@easyonetwothree
No one has ever claimed there are no classifications of sects, groups, etc. The conclusion you reached from this video is ridiculous, there are even those who choose to classify themselves such as yourself, so I don't see what is your issue. The purpose of this advise is for those whose main purpose is to classify the Muslims and have gone to extremes in this matter. One look at your page and one will conclude that you are one of those individuals who have gone to extremes.
SFAvfx 6 months ago
@SFAvfx "One look at your page and one will conclude that you are one of those individuals who have gone to extremes."
Yet everything you find on my videos is directly and straight from the words of the great scholars of this Ummah. Have a nice day akhi.
easyonetwothree 6 months ago
@easyonetwothree May Allah guide and forgive us ALL AAMEEN!
Ghareebaafidunya 3 months ago in playlist More videos from SFAvfx
Now someone might claim that this Sheikh is not knowledgeable or worse they will name him from one of the groups like Qutbi or Jahmi, Astaghfirullah
TahmidChoudhury93 7 months ago
Salamu alaykum. Beneficial fatwa. But, the shaykh himself knows (and uses) the terms (like ikhwaniyun) for the sectarians.
Also akhi, if u respect the shaykh, delete the stupid comments from takfiris here, who call him a defender of idol worshippers.. Allahul Musta'an.
ChechenMaga 8 months ago
@ChechenMaga - why don't you prove that your own comments are anything but stupid by defending this "shaykh"? takfir is an obligation in Islam and setting the principles of imaan and kufr is what all scholars and religious students must do. you cited a contradiction in the words of this shaykh (not hard to do with neo-salafis). research him further, and u see his own takfir in the form of calling the Mujahideen khawarij (something that only benefits the apostate rulers). jazakAllah khair
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@Mr1Fox9 Khawarij are khawarij, and calling the mufsideen khawarij who blow up muslims doesn't mean it's takfeer of them. Have a nice day :)
ChechenMaga 8 months ago
@ChechenMaga - yes, the khawarij are the khawarij, which is why you should go back and study who they were. khawarij groups exist today, but they are small and few between. the rulers are closer in attribute to them (but still not khawarij), and they hide behind this term to slander the Mujahideen in protection of their own evil thrones. they have set themselves up as partners with Allah. finally, the ones who are blowing up Muslims are the kuffar (w/ assistance from these tyrant rulers).
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@ChechenMaga - calling someone khawarij is a form of takfir as it implies that they are not of the Ummah but rather, they are of the "dogs of hell". it isn't a direct form of takfir, but the implication is the same. at least we are open and honest and direct about takfir - which is upon the tyrant rulers and those who directly aid them on account of their setting up themselves or others as partners with God...and on account of aiding the polytheists against the Muslims in war (an act of kufr).
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
Good video. Brothers don't be so harsh on easyonetwothree or each other.
Wowzerz00 9 months ago
salam aleikom.you guys drive me nuts with your comments :)) why dont you just study arabic and take the essence from arabic books not english translations.and good points Mr1fox9...
goatonfire 9 months ago
easy123 forgot to dislike the video. Maybe hes waiting for his sheikh ul Islam Abu khadeejah's orders on what to do.
blackb3ard911 9 months ago
*likes*
lovepoison102 9 months ago
Everytime i watch new uploads about such matters..... then I see easy123 from nowhere
TheMuslim0 9 months ago
@TheMuslim0
so what? whats your problem? Itaqillaah!
JihadOfTheSoul 9 months ago
Jazak Allah khair, wallahi Aki, i haven't heard about madkhalis or jaamiyyah or ikwani etc before except on YT .
IslamResponses 9 months ago
Wisdom! We're lacking a lot of that today subhanAllah.
shaykha 9 months ago
Baraka'Allahu feek akhi,
We need more of your videos (on any topic :)
TheEndGameBoY 9 months ago
JAK bro
Newf2islam 9 months ago 2
Assalaam Alaykum:
to clarify the mistakes and explain what is correct - often requires one to label. if something that goes clearly against Islam becomes associated with a certain group or manhaj or whatever…then clarifying those mistakes will not be possible (relatively speaking) without associating the group's name or label.
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
i'm not sure what the Shaykh was saying or meant in 0:49...but without a doubt, the biggest "tahazzubt" here is the term "saudi arabia" itself, and the nationalism that exists all over the Islamic world today. he is saudi, he is pakistani, he is icelandic - yuck! this has caused even greater harm to Ummah of Muhammad saaws as compared to smaller, dawah-based religous parties. jazakAllah khair
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
@Mr1Fox9
no akhee you are wrong, maybe it hasnt been this extreme, but a sort of tribalism/nationalism has always existed, this is the nature of human beings. if we were in 1 khilaafah we would divide ourself into areas and tribes still. The worst fitna to hit us Muslims is the emergence and spread of deviant groups within our religion, do you think Allaah will give us victory while we folow a path OTHER than what He has sent?
JihadOfTheSoul 9 months ago
Comment removed
TheMuslim0 9 months ago
@JihadOfTheSoul - 1 of 5 - no akhi, it has not been this extreme. but there is a difference between having tribes and nations...and putting those tribes and nations high above the religion of Islam. Islam came to unite the tribes and nations (not replace them) as the Quran testifies to. so long as Islam is the law of the land, it is ok if we describe ourselves based on our family or tribal or ethnic or even national origin. today however - the nation states that exist were created by the kuffar
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
@JihadOfTheSoul - 2 of 5 - the borders and boundaries were set by the european colonialists specifically to divide us, rule over us, exploit our resources, and prevent the Khalifah. the laws and constitutions of these nations are man-made (even if some Islamic laws are applied here and there). thus, it not just a matter of being a little extreme, it is a matter of kufr and shirk! it is a matter of blind following and brain washing!! in fact, the brain washing has become so severe that…
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
@JihadOfTheSoul - 3 of 5 - some average people put their allegiance to rulers who gave aid and asylum to Islam's worst enemies! they oppress their fellow Muslims (who are of different tribal and national origins) as well as their own fellow citizens and neighbors - all for a short worldy gain (and in what is known as the national interest). putting the national interest above the Islamic interest is to setup a partner with Allah. this is clear. and brother TheMuslim0 explained other issues...
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
@JihadOfTheSoul - 4 of 5 - Allah will not give us victory as long as we divide ourselves in ways that please the kuffar, remain enslaved to those borders and boundaries, and become proud and arrogant with regards to "Asabiyyah". Most average Muslims don't have the knowledge to really differentiate between these deep, hardcore religious parties (all of who state that their purpose is dawah). and so they don't know about the various mistakes or deviations or bidah or whatever.
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
@JihadOfTheSoul - 5 of 5 - we as students of knowledge do know those things, and they are important - but we also need to occasionally take our heads out of our books and look around and assess the reality of the current situation. thereby, we see that the bigger divisions within the Ummah today are in regards to the forbidden types of Asabiyyah more so than religious parties or aqeedah labels of matters of fiqh, etc. w'salam
Mr1Fox9 9 months ago
isnt Salah al Fawzaan the same person who praises the Saudi police in rounding up and torturing those muslims who traveled to Iraq to participate in the Jihad against the Rawafidh and the occupation.If this is the case then i dont think this man is worthy to even give advice on Khula
AbdulMumeet1970 9 months ago
Comment removed
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree
If you like the Fatwa, then stop writing ''duck this O Qutbiyyôn etc]
TheMuslim0 9 months ago
Comment removed
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree
And Ibn Baz has backstabbed the Salafi Da'wah Im sure you agree on that since your Leader Rabee al-Madkhali said so ;)
TheMuslim0 9 months ago
@TheMuslim0 Don't you have something else to do like watching some anti-"talafi" videos or something?
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
Comment removed
TheMuslim0 9 months ago
Akhi, it should say Jaami, not Jahmi. There are people that call the followers of Muhammad Amaan al-Jaami this name. Or did i hear something else?
ensafBiH 9 months ago
@ensafBiH Yeah he said "Jaamee" not jahmee.
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree Well, i guess then, if we arent allowed to call brothers takfiriyyun, jaamiyyah and so on then we shouldnt be allowed to call brother madkhalis or madaakhilah.
ensafBiH 9 months ago
@ Easy one two three, it's easy just like 123 to join us give it a go, stop your taqleed and join the pure manhaj of the salaf as salih, uncorrupted
MrAlmuazzin 9 months ago
Nice fatwa, barak Allah feek for upload, I didn't know you admitt the faults of Ikhwaniyyoon and Qutbiyyoon hehe, mashaAllâh akhi finally.
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree
0:26 "....to classify people, THAN THIS IS NOT ALLOWED, for it causes evil and fitnah."
SFAvfx 9 months ago 12
@SFAvfx I hope you're included in:
"We only clarify the mistakes" 0:26
Let me see you clarify the mistakes of Qutbiyyah wa Ikhwaniyyah. Salamu 'alaykum.
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree
Akhi, you have a lot of growing up to...I would appreciate if you do not share your out of context videos on my channel, that contain ridiculous titles, and pose misleading questions to the scholars.
SFAvfx 9 months ago 9
@SFAvfx
ASalaam aliekum
Isn't is important to know the methods of incoorect groups and who they are though to separate right from wrong, I mean thats why we separrate from teh extreme shias and shias in general.
Isn't it important like to categorize wrong to know truth and what to avoid, I mean the Propeht peace and blessigns eb upon him came witht he natural truth and a refuatioan to teh falsehoods andc their groups so yea.
hbk711x 9 months ago
@SFAvfx Sorry brother, didn't mean to insult you or bother you, may Allâh bless you for your good niyah. I hope I one day grow up as you hehe =P. Salamu 'alaykum akhi wa ikhwan.
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@SFAvfx Shaykh al-Fawzan: "to cathegorize the people into different groups to spread enmity is not allowed. But to do it to show what is right and what is wrong, is correct." (al-Muhadharat tape 176)
Akhi If you're going to upload such a fatwâ, then it would be better not to exclude other fatâwâ from the same shaykh, in sha Allah I hope you understand and put in action.
easyonetwothree 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree - No one gives a damn what a mouthpiece of the taaghoot has to say. this shaykh has committed clear acts of kufr based upon his statements you yourself have uploaded of his. this shaykh is a defender of the idol-worshipers - nothing less!! So what value are any of his fatwas, or any of his statements (with regards to actionable Islamic standpoints)?? may Allah destroy the neo-salifis, the taghoot they are enslaved to, their scholars, and their mouthpieces (which would be you).
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@easyonetwothree You're as bout as stubborn as my 2 year old niece.
SultanMehmed 9 months ago
@easyonetwothree brother its not good because its hurtful... (from experience i know!) maybe to you its ok and sounds good, but to whom its directed at its really hurtful, and in Islam you should not speak hurtful words to your brother's and sisters in Islam... so if you are doing such a thing its not good for you your only earning bad deeds...
saytuna2 9 months ago
@saytuna2 - I warn you against the likes of the neo-salafis like easyonetwothree. they are not our "brothers" but rather, the enemies within...the biggest fitnah within Ahlul Sunnah wa Jammah today.
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@Mr1Fox9 say wallahi! because this is the 1st time i herd of him so i watch the vid... how is he an enemy?
saytuna2 8 months ago
@saytuna2 - Wallahi (I swear by Allah), the neo-salaifs/medkhalis are our clear and open enemies. aside from being secterian (how many of the sects are in hellfire?), they ally with the rulers (i.e. the taghut) and slander the Mujahideen (calling them khawarij), and deceive the average Muslims with regards to what is going on in our Ummah today. they have endowed a culture of blind-following of palace scholars and refutation over every little mistake anyone makes! may Allah destroy them.
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@saytuna2 - also brother, just look up "fawzaan khawarij" and u fill find his pronouncements against Shaykh bin Laden (ra) and his defense of al-saudia. i described in some comments below to someone else the issue of the khawarij. the reality is that this person (and other medkhalis) bow before the taghut, slander the best of our Ummah, and remain silent about the shirk and fitna of nationalism. so be wary of them, and never trust them (even if you take the good while leaving the bad). w'salam
Mr1Fox9 8 months ago
@Mr1Fox9 its ok brother say no more, i do not like taking my letters and stuff from hypocrites that commit shirk and say they are Muslim...
saytuna2 8 months ago
@easyonetwothree
allow me to commenton on your last video about Abu is7aq Al Huwayni!
TheEndGameBoY 9 months ago