Exiles is right on it.The attempts to relegate the facts to the realm of conspiracy theory is the preferred mode of those who deny homicide in the case Jimi Hendrix.No need to open up the X-Files to determine the date of the alien invasion ladies and gentlemen,just take out your calculator and let it reveal to you in the dimension in which we all live that the 46 mg of alcohol found in his urine, quoted in the published autopst report equals 0.0016/oz.Are You Watching Closely?
Don't look at conspiracy theories, look at facts. Jimi was covered in red wine, but had hardly any alcohol in his blood. Jimi's lungs were full of red wine. How had he achieved that? Monika Danneman slipped out to buy cigarrettes while Jimi was dying. Why? Jimi had taken Vesperax, a strong pain killer, that immobilised him, but the autopsy proved that there were no barbiturates or other drugs in his system. Now consider, was Jimi murdered? Too many coincidences. Too convenient.
Don't forget we now have a confession and motive as well. Most Hendrix noodnicks are just here for the goods and don't really give deep thought to what happened to Jimi. Jimi is a pleasure object to be used and not one that requires difficult defense. If you are smart (and most Hendrix fans are not) you would realize the predictable absorption rates of both the Vesparax and alcohol preclude Jimi being conscious when the wine was introduced, and that in itself forensically proves murder.
@Exiles800 Exactly Right.. But i beg to differ with you on one thing tho... I've been a Hendrix Fan since around 68' and i'm an Electrical Engineer and a World Class Guitarist Myself, And alot of other Hendrix fans i know personally are some rather intelligent people, So were all not of lower intelligence ya know. But Great Post !!!
A woman calling her self "Mrs. J. Getty" ( aka Elle Von Lear) phoned me in 2007 and ranted about Hendrix being murdered by the infamous brutal British gangsters, the Kray brothers. I have a feeling the woman is a nut case. She was quite manic talking about Jimi Hendrix. She claimed to be a movie producer planning a film about "the murderof Jimi Hendrix." I didn't believe her.
There is no doubt that Jimi was a threat to the US government...I mean, I HEARD "Foxy Lady" for the first time just the other day. I think that scared everybody when that came out. There are so many holes in the official story, it's not even funny...it's really sad. We live in a violent and sick world...like a bunch of monkeys ripping at each other, shitting in our own house, and then throwing the shit at each other.
@dannon2010 All Jimi was really interested in was his guitar and music. Everything else was a side show, including money, sex, drugs, and politics. At Jimi's core was his guitar, the music, and love. That such a talent as Jimi's could be snuffed out at age 27 is the real tragedy. Whether murdered or not is not the real point. The point is Jimi is dead, and nothing can ever put that right or replace him. However, justice for Jimi still has to be served. The circumstances of his death stink.
I woke up, and the first thing that went through my mind..."Hendrix was murdered" Man, what a waste. There are some really fucking asinine people on this planet.
Ignore dungeons and dragons illuminati crazy talk. The best way to consider this is the British Government was petitioned to re-examine the case by Kathy Etchingham in 1992. After doing a phony review of the evidence they came back and said there was nothing new or different from the original investigation. 2 problems with that. 1st, there was no original investigation. 2nd, Etchingham proved that Monika's story was a complete fabrication. Therefore the Inquest was based on proven lies & invalid
The Grand Imperial Roadster of the local Illuminati chapter #110 called for his death because of the long standing Rohan blood fude between the Uk and Seattle Washington. Know to only a few, the Illuminati had been thrust into the lime light again (srt 1295, 1360, 1898, 1930 1968) this time by one of their own. Past Master Jimi Hendrix! In fact I'm in great danger just typing this on my computer but I don't care anymore. The world needs to know the truth!
I was told it was the same group (Illuminati) that got JFK, Martin Luther King, Bruce Lee, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Elvis and John Lennon! All because they held immense power over the masses and the powers that be at the time felt very threatened by these prophets of the 60s!
I've been studying Hendrix since I was 8 and believe you me, Michael Jeffries was a shady shady money hungry person and absolutely the worst person Hendrix could have been stuck with by luck of the draw. The bummer is Jimi was kinda handed Jeffries and just kinda took what he got and just ran with it. Jimi talked about being scared of his manager and how he kid napped him once to show him that he has ultimate control. I wouldn't put it past Jeffries cuz Jimi admitted being scared of him. halla
@joeabr Wow, please message me and tell me all about it. Because there are so many other theories of who killed him. I've seen another documentary on this implying that it was one of Hendrix's ex-roadies who killed him
and that Michael Jeffrey was falsly accused. They said that the murder was too sloppy to be a CIA hit. The documentary is called "The Crucifixtion of jimi Hendrix" or something like that, but it is on YT.
Fairchild was actually one of the first people to uncover the murder evidence but has since unexplainably become a defender of Jeffery. But common sense would tell you that if it was the roadies they didn't have the power to cause the British Gov't to do no investigation. That total lack of investigation with so much evidence of murder could only be done at the CIA level. Jimi's roadies were not responsible for Jimi's being on FBI's "Security Index", their list of greatest threats to the US.
I personally don't believe Hendrix was murdered. Noone has been able to show me any kind of evidence of that. If I see evidence, I will believe it. Evidence, not assumption or shadowy quotes years later.
The evidence is clearly there for anyone seriously looking for it. Jimi's murder can be proven in the autopsy data alone. You can't have lungs full of wine and only have a negligible blood alcohol content while having a 3.9mg barbiturate blood level. If you charted this forensically it would prove that Jimi had to be unconscious when that wine was introduced, and unconscious people can't drink "bottles worth" as Dr Bannister witnessed. What we are talking here is people not being able to see it.
The only way the common public can say they don't see any evidence is if they ignore the huge controversy over false stories and disproven accounts that has come to light recently. Plus there was even a murder confession that gave a clear motive and suspect. Really, the evidence for Hendrix's murder is so strong at this point that to doubt it in public is only to expose one's ignorance.
See the Documentary " The Last 24 Hours of Hendrix's Life". Hendrix was to testify the following day after he was murdered about his manager ripping him off. They went to interview Monica but the night before she committed suicide (murederd).
There was not enough of anything in Hendrix to kill him. He was asphixiated by the red wine which was poured down his throat. Read the coroner's report.
Better yet see the Documentary as they interview the Parmedics and the attending Phyiscian.
See the Documentary " The Last 24 Hours of Hendrix's Life". Hendrix was to testify the following day after he was murdered about his manager ripping him off. They went to interview Monica but the night before she committed suicide (muredered).
There was not enough of anything in Hendrix to kill him. He was asphixiated by the red wine which was poured down his throat. Read the coroner's report.
Better yet see the Documentary as they interview the Parmedics and the attending Phyiscian.
It never dawns on Jimistreets that Monika didn't call the ambulance for 5 hours because she knew Jimi was murdered. Monika wasn't the only person at the Samarkand for those 5 hours. Burdon, Stickells, Barrett, and Slater were there too. Streets is simply incompetent to this topic. If you have a competent approach, which Streets clearly does not, you would realize the evidence shows those people knew Jimi was dead while they cleaned evidence. Jimi was dead before Monika called Burdon. Murdered.
The reason Streets offers a retarded version of this is because he never processes the fact the forensics show Jimi was murdered around 4:30am. According to those forensics there wasn't enough time for this to happen accidentally. Jimi was found fully-clothed because he took super powerful pills after being told they were weaker Tuinols. He said to Monika he thought Devon had OD'ed him. It wasn't Devon it was the Vesparax, which proves he wasn't told what they were. They hit him like a hammer
as they were intended to do. People, realize Streets ignores the entire confession offered by Tappy Wright. He just allows himself the privilege of ignoring an entire documented history of Jeffery's subterfuge and CIA/mafia involvement and motives. Only fools, like JimiStreets, ignore all the converging evidence to show Jimi was murdered and offer such stupid denials. For goodness' sakes even Monika claimed Jimi was murdered but no follow-through ever occurred. Ever wonder why?
Give it a rest people. 36 times the normal dose of sleep medicine, mixed with wine, a life-long sleep disorder where he would choke in his sleep, a stupid German broad that waited 5 hours to call for an ambulance, Eric Burdon telling her to mellow out, and 4 years of almost daily use of hard drugs. That is how Jimi died. Case closed.
What sucks is that nobody, except for a couple of family members, took him aside and told him to straighten out. Not what I'd call friends...Miss you Jimi!
@jimistreet People, ignore JimiStreets. He's a troll who ignores the real evidence no matter how many times it is shown and doesn't have the mental capacity to process or understand it when he sees it. Smart people will see that already from his writing. Any intelligent look into the real evidence and, especially, the medical forensics will show right away that Jimi was murdered. Streets is just in denial that Jimi was set-up by CIA to take the most powerful sleeping pills available & murdered
@NEMESIS1JUSTICE Because Jimi Hendrix's murder was a CIA political assassination under their COINTELPRO program. Jimi was on a serious FBI list called the "Security Index". This list contained what FBI thought were the worst threats to the US Government. You see the US Gov't doesn't share the fact with the public that it operated some very evil programs where state security under FBI and CIA were assassinating people. They don't investigate it because if they did they would expose themselves.
@Exiles800 Ya' know, I just saw another docunmentary on this implying that Hendrix was killed by one of his former roadies that he fired and not his manager. They claimed that the murder was too sloppy to be a CIA murder assassination. Maybe the ex-roadie dude helped, there are just a lot of other theories.
@NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL You must be talking about Fairchild's video. You have to study CIA and how they work. They use proxies or 'patsies' to do their dirty work exactly so it can be plausibly denied. Those roadies didn't set-up dirty bank accounts in some of the CIA's most sensitive banks in the Bahamas, nor were they ex-MI-6 operatives. The roadies were Jeffery's employees. The murder occurred 12 hours after Jimi had fired Jeffery who previously threatened he would kill Jimi if he fired him.
Jimi's autopsy found that his blood contained 3.9mg of barbiturate. It also found a blood alcohol content of 5mg/100ml. Doctor Bannister said that after he unplugged a cork of vomit from Jimi's windpipe he then proceeded to suction out "bottles worth" of wine from Jimi's lungs and stomach. He also noted a "half bottle of wine in his hair alone" as well as a wine-soaked scarf around Jimi's neck. This large amount of wine conflicts with the negligible blood alcohol content. Also the autopsist Dr
Teare noted that Jimi's stomach contained undigested rice grains. Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at a party at midnight. Dr Crompton (Teare's successor) noted it takes the stomach 4-5 hours to clear it contents. This forensic evidence places Jimi 's death closer to the 4:30am time of death indicated by the other evidence as well as a confession. And the fatal forensic conflict between the blood alcohol content and the witnessed wine connotes a manner of death similar to that confessed.
If we create a forensic chart with the 3 critical forensic determinants of barbiturate level, blood alcohol level, and undigested rice grains we can interpret the predictable absorption rates of barbiturate and alcohol to determine a manner of death. The proof is shown by the fact 3.9mg barbiturate is a knock-out dose. Jimi was unconscious when he died. We can then determine the maximum amount of time it would have taken to only have a 5mg BAC. That time period is very short. Therefore Hendrix
could not have been conscious when the "bottles worth" of wine was introduced into him. And anyone who has bottles worth of wine poured into them while they are unconscious is someone who is, by definition, murdered. It can't be any other way. If you study all the lies, dubious circumstances, and motives around this, this forensic conclusion matches the murder evidence perfectly. There's a reason why Monika's lies ended up in her death, and Jeffery too, and it isn't because Jimi died by accident
The autopsy data sheet is not available to the public. The data it contains is available on page 9 of Henderson's 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky'. You can find that page displayed on Google Books. It's also in Shapiro's 'Electric Gypsy' and other Hendrix books. Read Tony Brown's 'Hendrix: The Final Days' to get the best perspective on the circumstances surrounding Jimi in the week before his death. Also, Sharon Lawrence's: 'Jimi Hendrix - The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend'.
If Slumber, who admits he's clueless on this (and should therefore reel-in his attitude a little) spent one tenth the effort he does ridiculing the topic on actually going out and looking into it himself I think he would answer a lot of his own questions. Google: David Icke d o t c o m and look in the Useless Media branch under the Hendrix Murder thread. I discussed the details in there. Sign-up, I'd enjoy returning your contempt in that more adequate forum.
I asked our troll Slumber to answer some very specific questions below about what he thinks of the fairness of making strict demands on people who discuss the murder evidence but making no such demands on the British Government in charge of the investigation? The British government did, literally, the most incompetent investigation of any death of a major figure with Hendrix. They did no analysis of the autopsy data. Twice now Slumber's passed on answering that or how it reflects on the case.
You can tell a troll by the substance of their comments. Trolls focus on ad hominem and ridicule. People seriously interested in the evidence behind Jimi's murder focus on it. It's a fact that there's so much evidence for Jimi's murder that anyone who had any true respect for either it or Jimi himself would never dare ignore it. You can tell a denial troll by the ratio of protesting-too-much vs their actual treatment of the facts and evidence.
No doubt I will be back when someone says how can ignore this mountain of evidence.
HAHA.
Yes I see its plastered everywhere. The links to it are overwhelming. So much so it might take me a few years to sift through it all its so thourough and detailed.
Ha. Thats a joke.
Again. I havent drawn a conclusion. Im just saying unless youve heard nothing more than another YT user saying, oh the CIA, oh plane crashes, oh confessions then how do you expect to be taken seriously. YOU CANT AND WONT!
You cant say officials were negligent and say documents exist proving this and that and then not show them.
I suspect he saw other youtube videos and took them for evidence. They arent. He has to prove officials were egligent. He has to prove the Dr said whatever, he has to prove quantities of wine, he has to prove a CIA link, or supply the smoking gun linking them to his murder.
As to what caused Jimis death I have an open mind. All Ive heard are words. And saw nothing.
outofslumber. what exactly do you need to hear/see? I take it you're a hendrix fan. if you are, do you really think his ultimate end was what the media pushes in your face? Go hear interviews from the head of the horse, jimi wasn't going anywhere.
exiles is the most passionate fan I've encountered. He is not a troll.
I play guitar so of course Hendrix is very much admired.
I havent said he want murdered. What Ive said is just because someone says he was, on a random youtube video doesnt make it so. He keeps saying Im ignoring the evidence. he hasnt bloody shown me any. Whats so friggin complicated about this. Is it just me or is this guy insane and really thinks because he said, repeated it makes it true. Even if someone who knew Jimmy wrote it in a book. That is whats called hearsay, at best.>>
<<At worst their trying to sell a book. If the evidence is someone in a book said she said he said its meaningless. All I asked for was links to autopsy reports. I also asked for the doctors notes/conclusions. Not someone said the Dr said, so I said. Not one link has the man put up for me to look at. NOT ONE. Links, evidence, make a case. If you repeat what you were told you are whats called a repeater. Saying trust me I saw the evidence is well.....weak! He opened the troll door.
I need to hear see something. Anything. You know, like when you go in a court of law to prove negligence in someones death. If you make that claim you must have seen evidence. Or you believe it cause someone else said it. If you go further and accuse someone who cant defend themselves of murder accusation, you need to take into that court some "EVIDENCE". You cant say trust me, he was a shady guy, he had to have done it your honour. Youll end up back in court on slander charges!
Your comments go back 17 pages out of a total of 18.
You are a 16 pages above and beyond any other so called troll.
Your pretty sick. I think you might be ill. You maybe should go see a doctor or something cause somethings clearly broken. Youve smeared yourself in shit and are now shouting at everyone else for stinking up the place. What a joke. Before you call anyone a troll take a long hard look. My posts are just asking for evidence. Im still waiting n posting
Outofslumber: Show us how credible you are by answering specifically what you think about the British Gov't's non-investigation? How they never bothered to investigate even the most basic things like time of death, or how they used Monika's lies to form their official verdict? Give us your opinion on the fairness and ethics involved in Brits operating from a vantage point of accepting a bogus Inquest and then viciously attacking those who do real investigations? Please answer this directly.
Gee, seeing how honest and forthright Slumber is I wonder how Jimi could ever have been murdered in England with such a strict evidence-demanding race? I know Slumber has such strict standards, as he shows us here, that he would never tolerate someone who damns the evidence yet has the balls to dodge it completely in public and still dare dismiss it without ever touching it. It makes me wonder how Jimi could ever have been murdered in such a country and not have the evidence investigated???
Ive told you once already. Drawing conclusions on flimsy or non existent evidence is what got you here in the first place.
As for trolling.
dont make me laugh. This whole thread has your stink on it Im guessing all the way through from the start. At least going back more pages than I can be bothered with. You are by every definition a troll. Youve offered nothing for an argument you defending with vehemence.
Now instead of deflecting put up your evidence or fuck off!
Again show me the papers from the investigation. Link to them. I dont know much about the case. And thats my point. Ive asked you to show me. Link to some sites, some evidence or anything, and you either wont, or cant. maybe embarrassed to link to some hack website full of gibberish and gossip. Come on throw something in. Links to autopsy reports or something. Im not googling shit. I dont care for sifting to see if what your sayings true. the onus is on you who makes the claim.
And just to add, there are real stories out there. Massive ones showing govt cover ups and complicity in murder. Cases like this where nothing is offered in evidence and everything is theorized and woven into a conclusion already reached, is the very reason people lump all conspiracy theory in the same nutbox. Each case should be viewed by its evidence. not hearsay, not what someone told you, not what you think. But the cold hard facts. Or even show enough anomolies to show it stinks. You havent
@outofslumber That's just blabber. You on the other hand haven't offered anything to show it isn't true. As a matter of fact your overly general attack on this is a good sign you can't deal with the direct individual facts I discussed. I agree each case should be viewed by its evidence, and the fact you stay safely away from the evidence I've discussed speaks for itself. The murder can be easily shown in the forensic evidence you dodge in order to dwell on blabber. Address my evidence please.
What's even more outrageous about you Brits is the fact you don't turn that same level of critical scrutiny against your own government that never bothered to follow your own advice since day 1 on this. The British Inquest never bothered with even the most basic of inquiries like time of death. None of the forensic evidence or witnesses were ever questioned. Monika's story, though now proven to be complete lies and directly causing her death, was taken directly and used to form the official
verdict. That's what I love about you Brits. You almost universally wage against the true evidence in this case, however you don't apply your own words to yourselves or make equal demands of your own gov't which is the worst offender of what you protest over. The evidence and cold hard facts you demand above have been categorically restricted and denied by YOUR gov't, however you don't seem to have any equal indignation over that and feel free to ignore it while demanding it of others.
If you think an intel organization would not kill 150 innocent people you need to think about Luis Posada Carriles who was trained by CIA and took down a Cuban jet full of civilians. Being a Bay Of Pigs veteran Carriles is safely protected by George Bush and CIA. Another example is the USS Liberty where intel cooperated with the attempted slaughter of 200 American sailors. If they succeeded you would be using the same denials to argue that case. They would do anything to protect those CIA banks
No I think I said I know full well what the CIA and US intel agency is capable of. See you have to paint me into a corner. But that corner only exists in your mind. Nothing ive said is unreasonable. If you believe Jimi was murdered and feel so passionately about it. MAKE YOUR CASE. Its not complicated. If you cant do more than offer he said she said the Dr said he said she did, oh and she did but now she dead so he dead cause she didnt. Then you have no case.
Verdict. You should stop trying to be a judge and jury tasked with coming to verdicts and conclusions. Thats what got your cock stuck in the vaacuum cleaner in the first place. 4 comments and you come to a "VERDICT". A generalization about Brits and then accuse me of "GENERAL ATTACKS". Man your a total cock end. I can smell a "na na na naa naaa" mentality from you.
Suffice to say I cant ignore all this evidence if you dont link to it. Not gossip.
Another Brit not afraid to show their contempt for the basic evidence. I think you are fooling yourself that your approach to this isn't based on denial as an opening and closing premise and not recognizing anything in between. I think you are failing to realize I've already proven this case. The way to credibility in this matter is through the evidence. And since you so visibly refuse to touch it you therefore forfeit your credibility. You're obviously desperate to dismiss in order to dodge.
Slumber is just heckling the facts and trolling basically. Any honest person can see the difference between someone who has a genuine interest in pursuing the evidence and someone attacking and ripping-down the obvious for purposes of denial while pretending to be asking for genuine evidence. The Brits are some crooked bastards because, once again, some of the most vicious and vile attacks against the evidence predictably come from England. They don't want to admit they murdered Jimi Hendrix.
@Exiles800 I'll pursue any evidence you show, with righteous vigour. Just FFS show me it. Dont just say this and that happened. Thats basically a guy on YT saying "this and that happened". You keep saying evidence. Show it! Show it! Show it! Show it! Link to it! Link to it! Nah. No matter how many times I say it you wont or cant link to evidence that isnt there. What part of this is hard for you. Apart from linking to some evidence. Youve shown squat, nada, nish, nothing. PS Im not English.
HA HA us Brits. Unbelievable. You go on about a death, how it was murder, how it was covered up, and then tell me to prove it wasnt. US BRITS? Are you for real cowboy?. Architects, engineers, pilots, senior Navy, Army, Scholars, University professors a whole host have put forward a rock solid case for a 911 plot orchestrated by your govt, and your whining on about Jimi Hendrix. You should be paying more attention to whos really got their cock up your arse. It isnt us "BRITS".
Thats unbelievable. You make accusations of murder and cover up, and expect the onus to be on me to prove its isnt true. Thats right out of a comedy sketch you friggin nutjob. CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF.
All I ask is I'll take you seriously when you can link me to some hard evidence. not, "someone said before they died this and that. So it must be true. That is called hearsay. Or ist his just blabber and you are categorically proving things here? Link to this "EVIDENCE" and I will look!
Again, you havnt shown or linked to any evidence for me to view. Youve just "SAID STUFF", then had the nerve to say Im blabbering. You couldnt write this shit. Look John Lennon was the second coming of Christ, and in 2011 Lennon is coming back to wreak revenge on the half lizard, half monkey, arab gangsters that really murdered him and the hippy movement. Now as ridiculous as that sounds, prove it wrong!!! by your logic if you cant, its true. Bob Marley confirmed it before he died.
JimiStreets is just an internet clown who likes to troll people who understand the evidence behind Jimi's murder. If you read his input it has zero substantive content. He advocates the official story even though most people, especially people with Hendrix knowledge, know the official story was disproven long ago. As anyone can see, his answers are just naysaying airheaded denial that aren't worth any serious Hendrix fan's time. Wright would pass a polygraph and JimiStreets would fail an IQ test
Some people would not recognize the truth if it walked up and punched them in the face. With 99.9999% of all conspiracies, the simplest, most logical explanation is the true explanation. I find it sickening, sad and pathetic that there are so many folks out there that feel the need to weave ridiculous tales of intrique, make up "facts" (thats you exiles800), and so fervently preach such a horrific message that this great, sweet, pleasant man was murdered in the worst way. Why, I ask? Why?
@jimistreets You're just blustering empty rumination. Until you can talk about the actual facts of the case you're just blowing smoke and showing people you can't handle it. Show me any facts I made-up. Show me. Stop talking trash talk and start talking actual evidence. You can't do it because you're full of shit and this trolling level of discourse is all you're capable of. I can talk facts and evidence directly. You can't. You lose. You're just a goof trolling the official story as real.
Oh please! Heard all of it! You do realize, don't you, that one can hear all this B.S. and not believe it, right? Dude, you say I deny the "facts", but I still have yet to see you raise anything other than speculation. Why is "Tappy" no longer "afraid" to talk? Because he NEVER had anything to fear. Why do you continue to preach this sad message of death, anyway? Tell me one good reason.
Have you read the latest book, "Becoming Jimi Hendrix"? In it, longtime girlfriend/roommate (cont'd)...
@jimistreetsPage 86 Lithofayne "Faye" Pridgon said that Jimi had a condition when he slept on his back, he would start "choking" and experience muscle spasms, so she constantly had to awake him to turn onto his side. When informed of Jimi's death,she said it was no surprise to her that Jimi died in a choking-related incident. Most people would take this info, combine it with the medical documents and statements from Monika, and conclude that it did not take a conspiracy to kill Jimi. Not exiles
@jimistreets You're an idiot. How many times did Jimi die with 9 Vesparax in him and bottles of wine in his lungs while with Fayne? There's a thing here called the autopsy data that you might want to familiarize yourself with. But thank you for showing people that JimiStreets is a person who dispenses with complex forensic science and practices the down-home Fayne Pridgeon Harlem version of forensics. You're a laughable fool. Ask Fayne how Jimi got 3 bottles of wine into him while passed-out?
The reason your input is self-exposingly dumb is because 1) If Jimi's alleged apnea was so bad it woke Fayne up to roll him over, why didn't it do the same to Monika? There was only one bed at the Samarkand and Jimi was covered in violent vomit and spilled wine. 2) The medical documents you so blithely refer to showed the forensic evidence for murder. It's a sign of your pure fatuosity that you offer documents that contain information that proves Jimi's murder as doing the opposite. FORENSICS!
Another sign of your insane lack of connection to reality in this case is you say above that we should use statements from Monika to conclude Jimi died by accident. This alone destroys your credibility since all known sources now admit Monika's story was nothing but total lies. The fact you believe them and ask us to use them to understand the evidence shows what an ignoramous you are. You seriously need to catch-up on this case. Monika was found dead from fumes when forced to explain her story.
@jessegguitar Because it was poured down his throat while he was overdosed on sleeping tablets in order to murder him and make it look like an accidental drug overdose. You are answering your own question in your sensing something isn't right with the lungs full of wine. What you can't understand is what shows the evidence for murder.
@jimistreets You're full of shit. I brought a forensic argument that not one single person was ever able to answer - including yourself. If you doubt Tappy Wright ran mafia money for Jeffery you are doubting something that is openly admitted by all members of Jeffery's office. If you don't believe it you are the only one. You're just in plain contempt of well-known facts. Thank you for doing that in public. Why should I beg some internet asshole in denial to believe basic well-known facts?
From reading Jimistreets' input you can tell he has no intelligent grasp of the evidence behind Jimi's murder. His input is basically strongly-delivered ignorance and is only himself answering to his own lower level of inquiry. I think he's shown us enough to understand the mentality of those who deny the murder evidence. Smart people will see right away that he has no intellectual ability to discuss this intelligently and that his accusation of my "lying, exaggerating, and ignoring facts" is
just the trash talk of a person in denial of the facts he refuses to confront directly. I don't think it is difficult to look at his input vs mine to see who can discuss the actual facts and evidence of the case and who is left to only self-exposing ad hominem and empty bluster. He accuses me directly of saying things that are untrue yet doesn't offer a single speck's worth of argument or reasoning to show why it is untrue. I think it is clear to most that Jimistreets is just knee-jerking denial
How does one explain the sick, twisted obsession people like exiles800 have to try and convince those of us "stupid f___ks" that Jimi was murdered, when the simple truth has been out there from DAY ONE! Why be so consumed with this sad, yet untrue, "message of death"? His religious cult-like fervor leads him to lie, exaggerate about "facts", ignore actual facts, then curse and belittle those that actually believe THE TRUTH?! exiles, its time to come out of exile and grow up and get real...
You guys are hilarious! Take that back. It would be funny if you weren't talking about Jimi. Your twisted tales are ridiculous. "Waterboarding"? You're kidding, right? Actual waterboarding is nothing like what you say was done to Jimi. Damn fellas! Get a grip! Jimi's sad death was tragic, and the way he died was tragically simple. You all make it sound like a damned James Bond movie! I find it hard to believe that normal, rational people would be so consumed with this crap. Therefore...
Tappy Wright is just one more of a long line of ghouls feeding off the legacy of this great man. With a book to sell, no less, and you all believe him! Think: If Jeffrey was cold-hearted enough to murder Jimi, why the hell would he "confess" to a freeking roadie? Why didnt this roadie tell the police? Fear? How the hell would the Mob know it was he who reported it? Did Jeffrey tell the mob he "confessed" to him? Its sickening that so many people propogate and believe this crap. Let Jimi R.I.P!!!
You are obviously totally ignorant of the facts behind this case. Tappy ran mafia bag money for Jeffery including large amounts of money to dirty Bahamian banks. He knew the people who Jeffery associated with and knew how dangerous they were. He saw not only Jimi murdered, but Devon and then even Jeffery himself. You're ignorant if you don't know 'rumors' were going on about all this stuff back then. Tappy wasn't dumb he saw the authorities weren't investigating it. He didn't want to be next.
Jimi should have left that asshole, i hope he has life, then the death penalty, not injection, but the chair!!! shit im still sad about jimis death, he was a great man.
Jimi was rare indeed. Hendrix is one of the most painful holes in history. His manager Michael Jeffery died under strange circumstances in a mid-air collision over France in 1973 a month after confessing murdering Jimi to road crew member Tappy Wright. Jeffery was lured to Majorca to fix an electrical problem at his nightclub. Meanwhile French Air Traffic Controllers went on strike and were replaced by less familiar military controllers. His Iberia jet made a strange turn into another plane. CIA
Thats intricate right there. I mean I believe some conspiracy theories have created such a stink, and have so many anomolies and things that dont fit, but this. Man this is intricate. Are you saying the CIA directed the plane into another one. Physically? By radio? If remotely, why not fly it into the ground. If by radio, it doesnt seem very CIA like to get the job done by a hit n hope type thing. Conspiracy is a part of human nature. Especially in politics. I dont see it here.
@outofslumber You don't understand the extremely sensitive intelligence operations that were threatened by Jeffery leading Hendrix's lawyers back to the CIA banks Jeffery was putting Jimi's money into in the Bahamas. They were key to the CIA's international anti-communist black ops during the Cold War. Jimi wasn't supposed to fire Jeffery. Jeffery was supposed to be Jimi's manager for a long time. Jeffery tried to intimidate Jimi with the mafia. CIA had to kill Jeffery to bury the whole thing.
@Exiles800 You see CIA couldn't hit Jeffery by normal means because it would have raised too many questions and sparked an investigation. They had just wacked Jimi and it was too hot. No one would question a freak plane crash. You have to understand the reason they killed Jeffery is because eventually smart investigators would have figured it out and asked him questions he couldn't answer. CIA did not want people to know MI-5 Jeffery was feeding the black ops fund and killed Jimi to cover it up
Was the plane remote controlled or did they "GUIDE" it into a hotspot via radio. If the former, the difficulty involved in remote piloting a plane to hit another plane is, well, if you cant see the problem. A remote controlled plane used for murder would be flown into the ground/ocean. If they verbally guided the plane into a hot area via radio, even thats kind of absurd. But you never answered these. Small details of general things said that dont add up arent helping you. HEARSAY.
@outofslumber The official investigation said they could never explain why Jeffery's jet made a strange hard right turn at the last moment sending it into the other plane. The planes were at the same altitude. I'm not an aviation expert but anyone could realize it wouldn't be too drastic a technical task to rig the guidance system to lock-on to another jet's radio guidance signal. You say it's "absurd" but what do you know? I think it would be fairly technically easy. Especially for intel.
Again. Your just saying stuff. Back this up. Link to this official document where they said they cant explain this and that. If you cant back up a single thing youve said, with a document you claim others should have i.e "THE OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION SAID". Did they? Show me! You also claim this one was an eye witness and said such and such. Show me the interview, or the documentary, or the on record copy of a statement. OR SOMETHING TANGIBLE
@barkbarkbarkbarkable Don't be silly! Fidel Castro hired a hitman named "Grassy Knolls", who happened to be a freemason spy in the CIA secretly investigating the carbon-footprint left by Marshall amplifiers which cause global warming and the decline of the polar bear population...
Good question. Insurance companies are the first people to look into evidence of foul play because they have an interest involved in determining what happened. I have never seen anyone produce any evidence of any insurance company paying-off Jeffery. If Jeffery was ripping Jimi off so badly why would he need any insurance policy? This stinks to high heaven. CIA was most-likely involved because they are the level that could prevent any investigation by either the Brits or an insurance company.
Well, the reason it didn't was because Jimi was black and all the medical personnel involved were unconsciously prejudiced and thought it was another drug overdose of a black person. Dr Bannister admitted he thought it was a drug overdose and didn't really register the significance of the wine at the time. The autopsist, Dr Teare, didn't see the wine in the lungs because Bannister had already suctioned it out. But Teare did record critical murder forensic data. It wasn't until Bannister was
confronted in 1992 with accusations of negligence in Shapiro's book 'Electric Gypsy' that he wrote a letter of protest to the author telling him about the wine. Other information in the book about intrigue and questions over Jimi's death made a light go off in Bannister's head realizing he had witnessed evidence of murder. And this was long before Tappy Wright came out and admitted he heard Jeffery confess in 1973 to waterboarding Jimi with wine. The Inquest may have cooperated with COINTELPRO.
Maybe ask his brother what He thinks and then call him pathetic.
Next you'll be telling me that 9/11 was carried out by GWBush, the same guy who in one breath is as thick as shit yet in the other clever enough to pull of the biggest black flag op of all time without any one person leaking a smidge of evidence. Do me a favour mate!
I've found that the Brits constitute at least 75% of the loudest murder deniers. Britain is a crooked, dodgy nation that doesn't want to admit one of its MI-5 members murdered Jimi Hendrix and its government covered-it up. Anyone could see Mistermusicmaker is a dumb-ass who deals in flimsy, transparent logic in order to avoid evdience he can't discuss. Jimi had lungs full of wine with only a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. The death scene showed splashed pure wine spilled during waterboarding.
@Exiles800 SoI take it that your a forensic specialist or SOCO? Hmmm yeah all us Brits are the same, yeah right, not only do you make sweeping generalisations but ontop of that you make up figures of 75%! that tells me all I need to know about you pal.
Get off the net and stop taking what you happen to read as fact. People like that are sad and have no mind of thier own.
Again why does it bother you that my opinion differs from yours? btw I am English not British, you mug
@Exiles800 You say "I have found 75% of brits" How did you find that out? what study did you carry out to come up with such a figure? You didnt cos you just made it up.
Im a dumb ass? You also say I deal with flimsy transparnt logic? what does that even mean? of course you use logic to draw conclusions you really are a retard arent you?
@Exiles800 Also I havent demanded anything from anyone so shut the fuck up.
Hendrix would prob hat you anyway and tell you to get a life and do your own thing and leave it to the police, you know them people who get PAID to do the job, unlike you who lives in a conspiracy ridden world. Why arent his family shouting about this then? Im sure if my bro was murdered I would demand answers but Jimis bro has more brain cells than you and clearly reached that conclusion through "logic"
Thank you, the more you talk the less convincing I have to do that dumb-asses and denying, nationally-biased Brits should probably be excluded from this. Sorry to get ugly but you've trampled on sacred ground with dumb stuff. Your mistake. Again, those who flagrantly deny are universally unable to intelligently confront the forensic facts. Jimi was murdered. The forensics and circumstantial facts prove it. You only help his murderers by waging against those who try to show it.
@mistermusicmaker My English friend, I see you have made the same mistake I made, namely, assuming that exiles800 could actually be reasoned with! This person has a strange, twisted obsession with preaching the "news" that Jimi was murdered. He makes up terms like "alcoholic waterboarding" (no such thing), "motives" why Jeffrey, the CIA, Illuminadi, etc, wanted Jimi dead, then weaves tales of intrique that would make James Bond proud. All of this while ignoring and berating those that differ...
Can you show me that photo of the "death scene" so I can see the volumes of wine we are talking about. I think its critical to your case. if its a lot of wine, and said wine definately came from his lungs, Id say yes, thats strange, suspicious. But where do you get the information about the wine, where it came from and specific volumes. Its pretty crucial. But Im not a conspiracy theory denier. People conspire, always have, but each case should be judged rationally by the evidence.
@outofslumber Dr Bannister witnessed it. Monika confessed the wine to Sharon Lawrence both the day after Jimi was killed and shortly before her own death. Dr Bannister was in the unique position of witnessing the wine because he unblocked the vomit in Jimi's windpipe and then proceeded to suction it out. We have witnesses who saw Jimi leave the last party with 2 bottles of wine and Monika admitted buying 2 bottles she had at the flat. Ask Dr Bannister, he had no reason to lie. Jeffery confessed.
Is the Dr on record about the quantities of wine. If you cant link to any evidence, testimony something......then. Its just a theory with little to offer in way of support. Ask Dr Bannister? Where is he? Is he alive? Im not saying your theory is wrong, but build a case with links to some evidence. Im also well aware of the lengths the CIA will go to for their bankster bosses. And well aware the organization has very little to do with preserving American soveriegnty. But.............
Its my opinion so why should you give a fcuk what others think? Thats the mentality that fundamentalist slamist have ie believe in what we do or face the consiquences. Its that, that is pathetic. Let the guy rest in peace.
Oh and is it just coincidence that the roadie who claims this just happened to be releasing a book? anyway as I said its my opinion not yours so keep your drivel to yourself
One thing is true about all Hendrix murder deniers, they wouldn't last ten seconds in a real discussion of the evidence. It's obvious some people don't care if he was murdered or not - which is what is pathetic here. Only a fool would argue that Jimi's murder and the powers that covered it up, powers that are still in control today, has no significance. These are low mentalities that just don't want to admit they like sucking off Jimi's music but don't like taking responsibility for his murder.
@Exiles800 One thing that is true is that We all will never ever know what really happened. Justify why anyone who"sucks off Jimis music" should care if He was murdered? I love Jimi more than any other musician bar Bob Marley but that doesnt mean I should believe that He was murdered and to call me pathetic for not buying into this conspiracy is just riddiculus and childish.
My original comment was based on all conspiracies not just this one. The guys lungs were full of vomit, its my opinion!
Why should I have to endure the rather obviously lacking opinions of people who haven't studied the first thing about the evidence? The reason I'm pissed about this is because there IS good evidence to show what happened if you bothered research it. You obviously know nothing about what you're talking about but have the chutzpah to demand people live down to your ignorant level. You're typical of the Hendrix Community that just desires smooth sailing for its dumbed-down outlook...
@gofuckyourselfish2 ...right on, dude...! And if you smoke weed, have a puff in my honor while at the concert.... I'll be doing the same for you later this afternoon. Cheers!
The murder evidence doubters make their critical mistake by not recognizing Monika is telling two stories. In the official story she says Jimi only had a trickle of vomit running down his chin. She did that exactly because she was aware that Jimi was covered in profuse vomit as the ambulance men witnessed. She knew that she had no excuse for not detecting and reacting to this profuse vomit event when supposedly sleeping right next to Jimi. So she lied and made-up the trickle of vomit.
Meanwhile Monika was quoted elsewhere as saying Jimi was "a mess". When she speaks of this "mess" she's referring to the "horrific" vomit witnessed by the ambulance men. So for her to have anything to clean up with wine fatally contradicts her official story which only speaks of a small trickle of vomit. The murder evidence doubters don't even notice this. These diametric conflicts are exactly what were leading Monika to be forced into court to explain herself.
You have to understand that what we have here is pure evidence in Monika's words and actions that she was aware Jimi was waterboarded to death and created this easily-disprovable story to cover herself. England is a crooked and dodgy nation (like the US) because this screamingly-obvious evidence is protected by squirrely libel laws and corrupted authorities. The delay to clean the flat was for murder evidence - not for drugs. Monika never made it to court and Scotland Yard isn't interested.
There's no "likely" about it. The forensics PROVE Jimi was murdered. I can't display them here but any clinical/legal look at the forensic evidence shows Jimi was murdered - which is why the authorities involved are so desperate to avoid it. All the circumstantial evidence proves it too. In any other case all these collateral deaths as well as confessions would have been used long ago to press a case for murder. Much glaring evidence is being ignored because Jimi was a political assassination.
There's a very simple formula here. The reason Monika's stories were all proven to be false was because Jimi was murdered. Just like in any other murder case where the stories don't add up Jimi's case is no different. The pure proof of a CIA political assassination is a confession and incriminating forensic evidence can exist in broad daylight that then goes uninvestigated. The reason those around Hendrix didn't get involved is because they knew this and didn't want to get killed themselves.
Devon had a good sense of what happened because she was close to the scene and the players. She was going around telling people Jeffery murdered Hendrix and was soon after found dead under the 8th floor window of the Chelsea Hotel. The NYC police were uninterested because they didn't want to cross purposes with a CIA COINTELPRO murder. If you gave Tappy Wright a polygraph he would pass it. Jeffery was killed in an unusual mid-air crash 1 month after he confessed to Wright. Another CIA murder.
Furthermore........... What could possibly be gleaned out of the new book, that has NOT been covered in the Henderson book? Monica Dannemann was used to lure Hendrix to his death, no doubt about it. She either worked knowingly with the Hendrix manager, or was the most glamorous of buffoons in history.
Exiles 800..... I just think that the David Henderson book is the best one that I have read on this subject in recent years. Likely Jimi Hendrix was murdered.
he was murdered. There was not enough alcohol in his system for alcohol poisoning. they drown him and thats how he threw up. poor jimi. He gave his life to help better the world and he gets taken out just like the rrest of them that try to do that. R.I.P. Tupac, Bob Marley, and Jimi Hendrix. let ur music live forever and ur spirit live inside others.
@Rebel4evermore I tend to agree. Especially since the manager also died and conveniently enough Monika (the girl who claimed to be there at the night Jimi died, this claim has been overthrown by the ambulance personel) was due to do a talkshow or something to spill the beans, she was found died, "suicide". Many of the supposedly involved parties conveniently died. But I wonder what the thruth is. Government, manager, Monika Dannemann?
The real cause of death is choking in his vomit, as a result of the pills 'n wine combination. That's for sure! Now, the question raises if it was an accident or if M. Jeffrey stuffed that shit bruttaly into his throat? If that were true, he would certainly be awake at the moment it happend (are you able to sleep while somebody's putting stuff in your throat?) and it would be kind of impossible for him to choke in his vomit, isn't it? If he really puked, he would still have the reaction to spit!
@SGCmyASS what you are saying is true, but keep in mind jimi was an insomniac and had to take a huge amount of pills to fall asleep, so once asleep he would be out cold, then once he was givin more pills, which could have been anything, and wine he drowned in wine or his liver failed
Exiles is right on it.The attempts to relegate the facts to the realm of conspiracy theory is the preferred mode of those who deny homicide in the case Jimi Hendrix.No need to open up the X-Files to determine the date of the alien invasion ladies and gentlemen,just take out your calculator and let it reveal to you in the dimension in which we all live that the 46 mg of alcohol found in his urine, quoted in the published autopst report equals 0.0016/oz.Are You Watching Closely?
Cordmichael 4 months ago
Don't look at conspiracy theories, look at facts. Jimi was covered in red wine, but had hardly any alcohol in his blood. Jimi's lungs were full of red wine. How had he achieved that? Monika Danneman slipped out to buy cigarrettes while Jimi was dying. Why? Jimi had taken Vesperax, a strong pain killer, that immobilised him, but the autopsy proved that there were no barbiturates or other drugs in his system. Now consider, was Jimi murdered? Too many coincidences. Too convenient.
MrMoggyman 4 months ago 3
Don't forget we now have a confession and motive as well. Most Hendrix noodnicks are just here for the goods and don't really give deep thought to what happened to Jimi. Jimi is a pleasure object to be used and not one that requires difficult defense. If you are smart (and most Hendrix fans are not) you would realize the predictable absorption rates of both the Vesparax and alcohol preclude Jimi being conscious when the wine was introduced, and that in itself forensically proves murder.
Exiles800 4 months ago
@Exiles800 Exactly Right.. But i beg to differ with you on one thing tho... I've been a Hendrix Fan since around 68' and i'm an Electrical Engineer and a World Class Guitarist Myself, And alot of other Hendrix fans i know personally are some rather intelligent people, So were all not of lower intelligence ya know. But Great Post !!!
jfmax2000 1 month ago
@jfmax2000 Which, if you think about it, is even more damnable isn't it?
Exiles800 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@Exiles800 For those of us in any Real Position to do anything about it.
jfmax2000 1 month ago
@jfmax2000 he he he he...
Exiles800 1 month ago
@Exiles800 Hey Man i keep tryin but for whatever reason (Big Brother..LoL !!) they wont let me post, just figured your all wondering why i'm not.
jfmax2000 1 month ago
@MrMoggyman Exactly Bro !!!
jfmax2000 1 month ago
I'm sick of conspiracy theories.
mliedlich2009 7 months ago
A woman calling her self "Mrs. J. Getty" ( aka Elle Von Lear) phoned me in 2007 and ranted about Hendrix being murdered by the infamous brutal British gangsters, the Kray brothers. I have a feeling the woman is a nut case. She was quite manic talking about Jimi Hendrix. She claimed to be a movie producer planning a film about "the murderof Jimi Hendrix." I didn't believe her.
duffh 7 months ago
Comment removed
duffh 7 months ago
freaking Babu lol
nettozu 7 months ago 2
gay ass indian reporter WTF
soulkw 9 months ago
There is no doubt that Jimi was a threat to the US government...I mean, I HEARD "Foxy Lady" for the first time just the other day. I think that scared everybody when that came out. There are so many holes in the official story, it's not even funny...it's really sad. We live in a violent and sick world...like a bunch of monkeys ripping at each other, shitting in our own house, and then throwing the shit at each other.
dannon2010 9 months ago 2
@dannon2010 All Jimi was really interested in was his guitar and music. Everything else was a side show, including money, sex, drugs, and politics. At Jimi's core was his guitar, the music, and love. That such a talent as Jimi's could be snuffed out at age 27 is the real tragedy. Whether murdered or not is not the real point. The point is Jimi is dead, and nothing can ever put that right or replace him. However, justice for Jimi still has to be served. The circumstances of his death stink.
MrMoggyman 4 months ago
@MrMoggyman Dead on Bro !!!
jfmax2000 1 month ago
I woke up, and the first thing that went through my mind..."Hendrix was murdered" Man, what a waste. There are some really fucking asinine people on this planet.
dannon2010 9 months ago
Ignore dungeons and dragons illuminati crazy talk. The best way to consider this is the British Government was petitioned to re-examine the case by Kathy Etchingham in 1992. After doing a phony review of the evidence they came back and said there was nothing new or different from the original investigation. 2 problems with that. 1st, there was no original investigation. 2nd, Etchingham proved that Monika's story was a complete fabrication. Therefore the Inquest was based on proven lies & invalid
Exiles800 9 months ago
The Grand Imperial Roadster of the local Illuminati chapter #110 called for his death because of the long standing Rohan blood fude between the Uk and Seattle Washington. Know to only a few, the Illuminati had been thrust into the lime light again (srt 1295, 1360, 1898, 1930 1968) this time by one of their own. Past Master Jimi Hendrix! In fact I'm in great danger just typing this on my computer but I don't care anymore. The world needs to know the truth!
Ducktowners 9 months ago
I was told it was the same group (Illuminati) that got JFK, Martin Luther King, Bruce Lee, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Elvis and John Lennon! All because they held immense power over the masses and the powers that be at the time felt very threatened by these prophets of the 60s!
2patero 9 months ago 6
@2patero Don't forget the same group sunk the titanic!
mixpebz 2 months ago
Comment removed
tonyvalente 9 months ago
I've been studying Hendrix since I was 8 and believe you me, Michael Jeffries was a shady shady money hungry person and absolutely the worst person Hendrix could have been stuck with by luck of the draw. The bummer is Jimi was kinda handed Jeffries and just kinda took what he got and just ran with it. Jimi talked about being scared of his manager and how he kid napped him once to show him that he has ultimate control. I wouldn't put it past Jeffries cuz Jimi admitted being scared of him. halla
joeabr 10 months ago
@joeabr Wow, please message me and tell me all about it. Because there are so many other theories of who killed him. I've seen another documentary on this implying that it was one of Hendrix's ex-roadies who killed him
and that Michael Jeffrey was falsly accused. They said that the murder was too sloppy to be a CIA hit. The documentary is called "The Crucifixtion of jimi Hendrix" or something like that, but it is on YT.
NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL 10 months ago
Fairchild was actually one of the first people to uncover the murder evidence but has since unexplainably become a defender of Jeffery. But common sense would tell you that if it was the roadies they didn't have the power to cause the British Gov't to do no investigation. That total lack of investigation with so much evidence of murder could only be done at the CIA level. Jimi's roadies were not responsible for Jimi's being on FBI's "Security Index", their list of greatest threats to the US.
Exiles800 10 months ago
@joeabr That is Exacly right My Man, I would'nt put it past Jeffereys Myself Bro !!!
jfmax2000 1 month ago
I personally don't believe Hendrix was murdered. Noone has been able to show me any kind of evidence of that. If I see evidence, I will believe it. Evidence, not assumption or shadowy quotes years later.
snakeweirdo 10 months ago
The evidence is clearly there for anyone seriously looking for it. Jimi's murder can be proven in the autopsy data alone. You can't have lungs full of wine and only have a negligible blood alcohol content while having a 3.9mg barbiturate blood level. If you charted this forensically it would prove that Jimi had to be unconscious when that wine was introduced, and unconscious people can't drink "bottles worth" as Dr Bannister witnessed. What we are talking here is people not being able to see it.
Exiles800 10 months ago
The only way the common public can say they don't see any evidence is if they ignore the huge controversy over false stories and disproven accounts that has come to light recently. Plus there was even a murder confession that gave a clear motive and suspect. Really, the evidence for Hendrix's murder is so strong at this point that to doubt it in public is only to expose one's ignorance.
Exiles800 10 months ago
What a crock!!!
searayus1 10 months ago
looks like jeffery only got 2 yrs. to enjoy the blood money he was so greedy for.I can imagine where he is now, home...
jgpification 11 months ago
See the Documentary " The Last 24 Hours of Hendrix's Life". Hendrix was to testify the following day after he was murdered about his manager ripping him off. They went to interview Monica but the night before she committed suicide (murederd).
There was not enough of anything in Hendrix to kill him. He was asphixiated by the red wine which was poured down his throat. Read the coroner's report.
Better yet see the Documentary as they interview the Parmedics and the attending Phyiscian.
Chazlaird 11 months ago
See the Documentary " The Last 24 Hours of Hendrix's Life". Hendrix was to testify the following day after he was murdered about his manager ripping him off. They went to interview Monica but the night before she committed suicide (muredered).
There was not enough of anything in Hendrix to kill him. He was asphixiated by the red wine which was poured down his throat. Read the coroner's report.
Better yet see the Documentary as they interview the Parmedics and the attending Phyiscian.
Chazlaird 11 months ago
It never dawns on Jimistreets that Monika didn't call the ambulance for 5 hours because she knew Jimi was murdered. Monika wasn't the only person at the Samarkand for those 5 hours. Burdon, Stickells, Barrett, and Slater were there too. Streets is simply incompetent to this topic. If you have a competent approach, which Streets clearly does not, you would realize the evidence shows those people knew Jimi was dead while they cleaned evidence. Jimi was dead before Monika called Burdon. Murdered.
Exiles800 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The reason Streets offers a retarded version of this is because he never processes the fact the forensics show Jimi was murdered around 4:30am. According to those forensics there wasn't enough time for this to happen accidentally. Jimi was found fully-clothed because he took super powerful pills after being told they were weaker Tuinols. He said to Monika he thought Devon had OD'ed him. It wasn't Devon it was the Vesparax, which proves he wasn't told what they were. They hit him like a hammer
Exiles800 11 months ago
as they were intended to do. People, realize Streets ignores the entire confession offered by Tappy Wright. He just allows himself the privilege of ignoring an entire documented history of Jeffery's subterfuge and CIA/mafia involvement and motives. Only fools, like JimiStreets, ignore all the converging evidence to show Jimi was murdered and offer such stupid denials. For goodness' sakes even Monika claimed Jimi was murdered but no follow-through ever occurred. Ever wonder why?
Exiles800 11 months ago
is this real or all bull? people shouldn't fuck with jimi when hes passed..
stnrs913 11 months ago
eric clapton and pete townsend killed jimi, god bless his soul.
nelson85b 11 months ago
@nelson85b you mean after Jimi demolished them all with his strat so they could never hold up their heads in public again... its understandable :-)
tonymckenziecom 10 months ago
Give it a rest people. 36 times the normal dose of sleep medicine, mixed with wine, a life-long sleep disorder where he would choke in his sleep, a stupid German broad that waited 5 hours to call for an ambulance, Eric Burdon telling her to mellow out, and 4 years of almost daily use of hard drugs. That is how Jimi died. Case closed.
What sucks is that nobody, except for a couple of family members, took him aside and told him to straighten out. Not what I'd call friends...Miss you Jimi!
jimistreets 11 months ago
@jimistreet People, ignore JimiStreets. He's a troll who ignores the real evidence no matter how many times it is shown and doesn't have the mental capacity to process or understand it when he sees it. Smart people will see that already from his writing. Any intelligent look into the real evidence and, especially, the medical forensics will show right away that Jimi was murdered. Streets is just in denial that Jimi was set-up by CIA to take the most powerful sleeping pills available & murdered
Exiles800 11 months ago
Why wasn't this investigated?
NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL 1 year ago
@NEMESIS1JUSTICE Because Jimi Hendrix's murder was a CIA political assassination under their COINTELPRO program. Jimi was on a serious FBI list called the "Security Index". This list contained what FBI thought were the worst threats to the US Government. You see the US Gov't doesn't share the fact with the public that it operated some very evil programs where state security under FBI and CIA were assassinating people. They don't investigate it because if they did they would expose themselves.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 THAT IS HAPPENED
gronlaf 11 months ago
@Exiles800 Ya' know, I just saw another docunmentary on this implying that Hendrix was killed by one of his former roadies that he fired and not his manager. They claimed that the murder was too sloppy to be a CIA murder assassination. Maybe the ex-roadie dude helped, there are just a lot of other theories.
NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL 10 months ago
@NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL You must be talking about Fairchild's video. You have to study CIA and how they work. They use proxies or 'patsies' to do their dirty work exactly so it can be plausibly denied. Those roadies didn't set-up dirty bank accounts in some of the CIA's most sensitive banks in the Bahamas, nor were they ex-MI-6 operatives. The roadies were Jeffery's employees. The murder occurred 12 hours after Jimi had fired Jeffery who previously threatened he would kill Jimi if he fired him.
Exiles800 10 months ago
Comment removed
NEMESIS1JUSTICE4ALL 1 year ago
I am hendrix, the rabbit lives on.
holmberg89 1 year ago
@holmberg89 cool mind playing little bird?
crazygeek777 1 year ago
Jimi's autopsy found that his blood contained 3.9mg of barbiturate. It also found a blood alcohol content of 5mg/100ml. Doctor Bannister said that after he unplugged a cork of vomit from Jimi's windpipe he then proceeded to suction out "bottles worth" of wine from Jimi's lungs and stomach. He also noted a "half bottle of wine in his hair alone" as well as a wine-soaked scarf around Jimi's neck. This large amount of wine conflicts with the negligible blood alcohol content. Also the autopsist Dr
Exiles800 1 year ago
Teare noted that Jimi's stomach contained undigested rice grains. Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at a party at midnight. Dr Crompton (Teare's successor) noted it takes the stomach 4-5 hours to clear it contents. This forensic evidence places Jimi 's death closer to the 4:30am time of death indicated by the other evidence as well as a confession. And the fatal forensic conflict between the blood alcohol content and the witnessed wine connotes a manner of death similar to that confessed.
Exiles800 1 year ago
If we create a forensic chart with the 3 critical forensic determinants of barbiturate level, blood alcohol level, and undigested rice grains we can interpret the predictable absorption rates of barbiturate and alcohol to determine a manner of death. The proof is shown by the fact 3.9mg barbiturate is a knock-out dose. Jimi was unconscious when he died. We can then determine the maximum amount of time it would have taken to only have a 5mg BAC. That time period is very short. Therefore Hendrix
Exiles800 1 year ago
could not have been conscious when the "bottles worth" of wine was introduced into him. And anyone who has bottles worth of wine poured into them while they are unconscious is someone who is, by definition, murdered. It can't be any other way. If you study all the lies, dubious circumstances, and motives around this, this forensic conclusion matches the murder evidence perfectly. There's a reason why Monika's lies ended up in her death, and Jeffery too, and it isn't because Jimi died by accident
Exiles800 1 year ago
The autopsy data sheet is not available to the public. The data it contains is available on page 9 of Henderson's 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky'. You can find that page displayed on Google Books. It's also in Shapiro's 'Electric Gypsy' and other Hendrix books. Read Tony Brown's 'Hendrix: The Final Days' to get the best perspective on the circumstances surrounding Jimi in the week before his death. Also, Sharon Lawrence's: 'Jimi Hendrix - The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend'.
Exiles800 1 year ago
If Slumber, who admits he's clueless on this (and should therefore reel-in his attitude a little) spent one tenth the effort he does ridiculing the topic on actually going out and looking into it himself I think he would answer a lot of his own questions. Google: David Icke d o t c o m and look in the Useless Media branch under the Hendrix Murder thread. I discussed the details in there. Sign-up, I'd enjoy returning your contempt in that more adequate forum.
Exiles800 1 year ago
I asked our troll Slumber to answer some very specific questions below about what he thinks of the fairness of making strict demands on people who discuss the murder evidence but making no such demands on the British Government in charge of the investigation? The British government did, literally, the most incompetent investigation of any death of a major figure with Hendrix. They did no analysis of the autopsy data. Twice now Slumber's passed on answering that or how it reflects on the case.
Exiles800 1 year ago
You can tell a troll by the substance of their comments. Trolls focus on ad hominem and ridicule. People seriously interested in the evidence behind Jimi's murder focus on it. It's a fact that there's so much evidence for Jimi's murder that anyone who had any true respect for either it or Jimi himself would never dare ignore it. You can tell a denial troll by the ratio of protesting-too-much vs their actual treatment of the facts and evidence.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Actually Im now convinced. I posted so many times on this thread YT wanted a code typed. The code said Jimiwasmurdered.
Man Ive been so blind, forgive me. I have all the evidence I need. God sent it in a cipher.
outofslumber 1 year ago
No doubt I will be back when someone says how can ignore this mountain of evidence.
HAHA.
Yes I see its plastered everywhere. The links to it are overwhelming. So much so it might take me a few years to sift through it all its so thourough and detailed.
Ha. Thats a joke.
Again. I havent drawn a conclusion. Im just saying unless youve heard nothing more than another YT user saying, oh the CIA, oh plane crashes, oh confessions then how do you expect to be taken seriously. YOU CANT AND WONT!
outofslumber 1 year ago
YEs and still waiting.
You cant say officials were negligent and say documents exist proving this and that and then not show them.
I suspect he saw other youtube videos and took them for evidence. They arent. He has to prove officials were egligent. He has to prove the Dr said whatever, he has to prove quantities of wine, he has to prove a CIA link, or supply the smoking gun linking them to his murder.
As to what caused Jimis death I have an open mind. All Ive heard are words. And saw nothing.
outofslumber 1 year ago
outofslumber. what exactly do you need to hear/see? I take it you're a hendrix fan. if you are, do you really think his ultimate end was what the media pushes in your face? Go hear interviews from the head of the horse, jimi wasn't going anywhere.
exiles is the most passionate fan I've encountered. He is not a troll.
777Sexton 1 year ago
@777Sexton
I play guitar so of course Hendrix is very much admired.
I havent said he want murdered. What Ive said is just because someone says he was, on a random youtube video doesnt make it so. He keeps saying Im ignoring the evidence. he hasnt bloody shown me any. Whats so friggin complicated about this. Is it just me or is this guy insane and really thinks because he said, repeated it makes it true. Even if someone who knew Jimmy wrote it in a book. That is whats called hearsay, at best.>>
outofslumber 1 year ago
@777Sexton
<<At worst their trying to sell a book. If the evidence is someone in a book said she said he said its meaningless. All I asked for was links to autopsy reports. I also asked for the doctors notes/conclusions. Not someone said the Dr said, so I said. Not one link has the man put up for me to look at. NOT ONE. Links, evidence, make a case. If you repeat what you were told you are whats called a repeater. Saying trust me I saw the evidence is well.....weak! He opened the troll door.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@777Sexton
I need to hear see something. Anything. You know, like when you go in a court of law to prove negligence in someones death. If you make that claim you must have seen evidence. Or you believe it cause someone else said it. If you go further and accuse someone who cant defend themselves of murder accusation, you need to take into that court some "EVIDENCE". You cant say trust me, he was a shady guy, he had to have done it your honour. Youll end up back in court on slander charges!
outofslumber 1 year ago
I just checked out of curiosity.
Your comments go back 17 pages out of a total of 18.
You are a 16 pages above and beyond any other so called troll.
Your pretty sick. I think you might be ill. You maybe should go see a doctor or something cause somethings clearly broken. Youve smeared yourself in shit and are now shouting at everyone else for stinking up the place. What a joke. Before you call anyone a troll take a long hard look. My posts are just asking for evidence. Im still waiting n posting
outofslumber 1 year ago
Outofslumber: Show us how credible you are by answering specifically what you think about the British Gov't's non-investigation? How they never bothered to investigate even the most basic things like time of death, or how they used Monika's lies to form their official verdict? Give us your opinion on the fairness and ethics involved in Brits operating from a vantage point of accepting a bogus Inquest and then viciously attacking those who do real investigations? Please answer this directly.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Gee, seeing how honest and forthright Slumber is I wonder how Jimi could ever have been murdered in England with such a strict evidence-demanding race? I know Slumber has such strict standards, as he shows us here, that he would never tolerate someone who damns the evidence yet has the balls to dodge it completely in public and still dare dismiss it without ever touching it. It makes me wonder how Jimi could ever have been murdered in such a country and not have the evidence investigated???
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Im not English.
Ive told you once already. Drawing conclusions on flimsy or non existent evidence is what got you here in the first place.
As for trolling.
dont make me laugh. This whole thread has your stink on it Im guessing all the way through from the start. At least going back more pages than I can be bothered with. You are by every definition a troll. Youve offered nothing for an argument you defending with vehemence.
Now instead of deflecting put up your evidence or fuck off!
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Again show me the papers from the investigation. Link to them. I dont know much about the case. And thats my point. Ive asked you to show me. Link to some sites, some evidence or anything, and you either wont, or cant. maybe embarrassed to link to some hack website full of gibberish and gossip. Come on throw something in. Links to autopsy reports or something. Im not googling shit. I dont care for sifting to see if what your sayings true. the onus is on you who makes the claim.
outofslumber 1 year ago
And just to add, there are real stories out there. Massive ones showing govt cover ups and complicity in murder. Cases like this where nothing is offered in evidence and everything is theorized and woven into a conclusion already reached, is the very reason people lump all conspiracy theory in the same nutbox. Each case should be viewed by its evidence. not hearsay, not what someone told you, not what you think. But the cold hard facts. Or even show enough anomolies to show it stinks. You havent
outofslumber 1 year ago
@outofslumber That's just blabber. You on the other hand haven't offered anything to show it isn't true. As a matter of fact your overly general attack on this is a good sign you can't deal with the direct individual facts I discussed. I agree each case should be viewed by its evidence, and the fact you stay safely away from the evidence I've discussed speaks for itself. The murder can be easily shown in the forensic evidence you dodge in order to dwell on blabber. Address my evidence please.
Exiles800 1 year ago
What's even more outrageous about you Brits is the fact you don't turn that same level of critical scrutiny against your own government that never bothered to follow your own advice since day 1 on this. The British Inquest never bothered with even the most basic of inquiries like time of death. None of the forensic evidence or witnesses were ever questioned. Monika's story, though now proven to be complete lies and directly causing her death, was taken directly and used to form the official
Exiles800 1 year ago
verdict. That's what I love about you Brits. You almost universally wage against the true evidence in this case, however you don't apply your own words to yourselves or make equal demands of your own gov't which is the worst offender of what you protest over. The evidence and cold hard facts you demand above have been categorically restricted and denied by YOUR gov't, however you don't seem to have any equal indignation over that and feel free to ignore it while demanding it of others.
Exiles800 1 year ago
If you think an intel organization would not kill 150 innocent people you need to think about Luis Posada Carriles who was trained by CIA and took down a Cuban jet full of civilians. Being a Bay Of Pigs veteran Carriles is safely protected by George Bush and CIA. Another example is the USS Liberty where intel cooperated with the attempted slaughter of 200 American sailors. If they succeeded you would be using the same denials to argue that case. They would do anything to protect those CIA banks
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800
No I think I said I know full well what the CIA and US intel agency is capable of. See you have to paint me into a corner. But that corner only exists in your mind. Nothing ive said is unreasonable. If you believe Jimi was murdered and feel so passionately about it. MAKE YOUR CASE. Its not complicated. If you cant do more than offer he said she said the Dr said he said she did, oh and she did but now she dead so he dead cause she didnt. Then you have no case.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Verdict. You should stop trying to be a judge and jury tasked with coming to verdicts and conclusions. Thats what got your cock stuck in the vaacuum cleaner in the first place. 4 comments and you come to a "VERDICT". A generalization about Brits and then accuse me of "GENERAL ATTACKS". Man your a total cock end. I can smell a "na na na naa naaa" mentality from you.
Suffice to say I cant ignore all this evidence if you dont link to it. Not gossip.
VERDICT:CASE DISMISSED
outofslumber 1 year ago
Another Brit not afraid to show their contempt for the basic evidence. I think you are fooling yourself that your approach to this isn't based on denial as an opening and closing premise and not recognizing anything in between. I think you are failing to realize I've already proven this case. The way to credibility in this matter is through the evidence. And since you so visibly refuse to touch it you therefore forfeit your credibility. You're obviously desperate to dismiss in order to dodge.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Slumber is just heckling the facts and trolling basically. Any honest person can see the difference between someone who has a genuine interest in pursuing the evidence and someone attacking and ripping-down the obvious for purposes of denial while pretending to be asking for genuine evidence. The Brits are some crooked bastards because, once again, some of the most vicious and vile attacks against the evidence predictably come from England. They don't want to admit they murdered Jimi Hendrix.
Exiles800 1 year ago
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Its not complicated. Nearly every conspiracy theory shows some evidence of foul play. Some show a mountain of it.
Youve shown nothing, youve just talked.
SHOW ME WHERE THIS EVIDENCE IS. Are you stupid You havent shown me any evidence to judge it you fucking numbnut.
I wont be wasting much more time on you.
You show me the "EVIDENCE" I keep ignoring.
Dont deflect. Show me what convinced you. Link to something, so weve got more than a guy on you tube saying stuff. SOMETHING, ANYTHING.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
HA HA us Brits. Unbelievable. You go on about a death, how it was murder, how it was covered up, and then tell me to prove it wasnt. US BRITS? Are you for real cowboy?. Architects, engineers, pilots, senior Navy, Army, Scholars, University professors a whole host have put forward a rock solid case for a 911 plot orchestrated by your govt, and your whining on about Jimi Hendrix. You should be paying more attention to whos really got their cock up your arse. It isnt us "BRITS".
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Thats unbelievable. You make accusations of murder and cover up, and expect the onus to be on me to prove its isnt true. Thats right out of a comedy sketch you friggin nutjob. CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF.
All I ask is I'll take you seriously when you can link me to some hard evidence. not, "someone said before they died this and that. So it must be true. That is called hearsay. Or ist his just blabber and you are categorically proving things here? Link to this "EVIDENCE" and I will look!
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Again, you havnt shown or linked to any evidence for me to view. Youve just "SAID STUFF", then had the nerve to say Im blabbering. You couldnt write this shit. Look John Lennon was the second coming of Christ, and in 2011 Lennon is coming back to wreak revenge on the half lizard, half monkey, arab gangsters that really murdered him and the hippy movement. Now as ridiculous as that sounds, prove it wrong!!! by your logic if you cant, its true. Bob Marley confirmed it before he died.
outofslumber 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe Hendrix was killed. Fuck you Michael Jeffrey.
RebelThoughts 1 year ago
JimiStreets is just an internet clown who likes to troll people who understand the evidence behind Jimi's murder. If you read his input it has zero substantive content. He advocates the official story even though most people, especially people with Hendrix knowledge, know the official story was disproven long ago. As anyone can see, his answers are just naysaying airheaded denial that aren't worth any serious Hendrix fan's time. Wright would pass a polygraph and JimiStreets would fail an IQ test
Exiles800 1 year ago
Some people would not recognize the truth if it walked up and punched them in the face. With 99.9999% of all conspiracies, the simplest, most logical explanation is the true explanation. I find it sickening, sad and pathetic that there are so many folks out there that feel the need to weave ridiculous tales of intrique, make up "facts" (thats you exiles800), and so fervently preach such a horrific message that this great, sweet, pleasant man was murdered in the worst way. Why, I ask? Why?
jimistreets 1 year ago
@jimistreets You're just blustering empty rumination. Until you can talk about the actual facts of the case you're just blowing smoke and showing people you can't handle it. Show me any facts I made-up. Show me. Stop talking trash talk and start talking actual evidence. You can't do it because you're full of shit and this trolling level of discourse is all you're capable of. I can talk facts and evidence directly. You can't. You lose. You're just a goof trolling the official story as real.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Oh please! Heard all of it! You do realize, don't you, that one can hear all this B.S. and not believe it, right? Dude, you say I deny the "facts", but I still have yet to see you raise anything other than speculation. Why is "Tappy" no longer "afraid" to talk? Because he NEVER had anything to fear. Why do you continue to preach this sad message of death, anyway? Tell me one good reason.
Have you read the latest book, "Becoming Jimi Hendrix"? In it, longtime girlfriend/roommate (cont'd)...
jimistreets 1 year ago
@jimistreetsPage 86 Lithofayne "Faye" Pridgon said that Jimi had a condition when he slept on his back, he would start "choking" and experience muscle spasms, so she constantly had to awake him to turn onto his side. When informed of Jimi's death,she said it was no surprise to her that Jimi died in a choking-related incident. Most people would take this info, combine it with the medical documents and statements from Monika, and conclude that it did not take a conspiracy to kill Jimi. Not exiles
jimistreets 1 year ago
@jimistreets You're an idiot. How many times did Jimi die with 9 Vesparax in him and bottles of wine in his lungs while with Fayne? There's a thing here called the autopsy data that you might want to familiarize yourself with. But thank you for showing people that JimiStreets is a person who dispenses with complex forensic science and practices the down-home Fayne Pridgeon Harlem version of forensics. You're a laughable fool. Ask Fayne how Jimi got 3 bottles of wine into him while passed-out?
Exiles800 1 year ago
The reason your input is self-exposingly dumb is because 1) If Jimi's alleged apnea was so bad it woke Fayne up to roll him over, why didn't it do the same to Monika? There was only one bed at the Samarkand and Jimi was covered in violent vomit and spilled wine. 2) The medical documents you so blithely refer to showed the forensic evidence for murder. It's a sign of your pure fatuosity that you offer documents that contain information that proves Jimi's murder as doing the opposite. FORENSICS!
Exiles800 1 year ago
Another sign of your insane lack of connection to reality in this case is you say above that we should use statements from Monika to conclude Jimi died by accident. This alone destroys your credibility since all known sources now admit Monika's story was nothing but total lies. The fact you believe them and ask us to use them to understand the evidence shows what an ignoramous you are. You seriously need to catch-up on this case. Monika was found dead from fumes when forced to explain her story.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 why did the doctor say that high amounts of alcohol poured from his lungs... why would jimi not swallow his wine?? why would he inhale it?
jessegguitar 1 year ago
@jessegguitar Because it was poured down his throat while he was overdosed on sleeping tablets in order to murder him and make it look like an accidental drug overdose. You are answering your own question in your sensing something isn't right with the lungs full of wine. What you can't understand is what shows the evidence for murder.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 ooh.. i believe he was murdered.. but i wasnt sure what u were believing.. so he was murdered... most likely?
jessegguitar 1 year ago
@jessegguitar No doubt about it. That's why they're not re-opening the case or even bothering with the most basic review of the evidence.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@jimistreets You're full of shit. I brought a forensic argument that not one single person was ever able to answer - including yourself. If you doubt Tappy Wright ran mafia money for Jeffery you are doubting something that is openly admitted by all members of Jeffery's office. If you don't believe it you are the only one. You're just in plain contempt of well-known facts. Thank you for doing that in public. Why should I beg some internet asshole in denial to believe basic well-known facts?
Exiles800 1 year ago
From reading Jimistreets' input you can tell he has no intelligent grasp of the evidence behind Jimi's murder. His input is basically strongly-delivered ignorance and is only himself answering to his own lower level of inquiry. I think he's shown us enough to understand the mentality of those who deny the murder evidence. Smart people will see right away that he has no intellectual ability to discuss this intelligently and that his accusation of my "lying, exaggerating, and ignoring facts" is
Exiles800 1 year ago
just the trash talk of a person in denial of the facts he refuses to confront directly. I don't think it is difficult to look at his input vs mine to see who can discuss the actual facts and evidence of the case and who is left to only self-exposing ad hominem and empty bluster. He accuses me directly of saying things that are untrue yet doesn't offer a single speck's worth of argument or reasoning to show why it is untrue. I think it is clear to most that Jimistreets is just knee-jerking denial
Exiles800 1 year ago
How does one explain the sick, twisted obsession people like exiles800 have to try and convince those of us "stupid f___ks" that Jimi was murdered, when the simple truth has been out there from DAY ONE! Why be so consumed with this sad, yet untrue, "message of death"? His religious cult-like fervor leads him to lie, exaggerate about "facts", ignore actual facts, then curse and belittle those that actually believe THE TRUTH?! exiles, its time to come out of exile and grow up and get real...
jimistreets 1 year ago
You guys are hilarious! Take that back. It would be funny if you weren't talking about Jimi. Your twisted tales are ridiculous. "Waterboarding"? You're kidding, right? Actual waterboarding is nothing like what you say was done to Jimi. Damn fellas! Get a grip! Jimi's sad death was tragic, and the way he died was tragically simple. You all make it sound like a damned James Bond movie! I find it hard to believe that normal, rational people would be so consumed with this crap. Therefore...
jimistreets 1 year ago
Tappy Wright is just one more of a long line of ghouls feeding off the legacy of this great man. With a book to sell, no less, and you all believe him! Think: If Jeffrey was cold-hearted enough to murder Jimi, why the hell would he "confess" to a freeking roadie? Why didnt this roadie tell the police? Fear? How the hell would the Mob know it was he who reported it? Did Jeffrey tell the mob he "confessed" to him? Its sickening that so many people propogate and believe this crap. Let Jimi R.I.P!!!
jimistreets 1 year ago
You are obviously totally ignorant of the facts behind this case. Tappy ran mafia bag money for Jeffery including large amounts of money to dirty Bahamian banks. He knew the people who Jeffery associated with and knew how dangerous they were. He saw not only Jimi murdered, but Devon and then even Jeffery himself. You're ignorant if you don't know 'rumors' were going on about all this stuff back then. Tappy wasn't dumb he saw the authorities weren't investigating it. He didn't want to be next.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Jimi should have left that asshole, i hope he has life, then the death penalty, not injection, but the chair!!! shit im still sad about jimis death, he was a great man.
soulleskill 1 year ago
Jimi was rare indeed. Hendrix is one of the most painful holes in history. His manager Michael Jeffery died under strange circumstances in a mid-air collision over France in 1973 a month after confessing murdering Jimi to road crew member Tappy Wright. Jeffery was lured to Majorca to fix an electrical problem at his nightclub. Meanwhile French Air Traffic Controllers went on strike and were replaced by less familiar military controllers. His Iberia jet made a strange turn into another plane. CIA
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Thats intricate right there. I mean I believe some conspiracy theories have created such a stink, and have so many anomolies and things that dont fit, but this. Man this is intricate. Are you saying the CIA directed the plane into another one. Physically? By radio? If remotely, why not fly it into the ground. If by radio, it doesnt seem very CIA like to get the job done by a hit n hope type thing. Conspiracy is a part of human nature. Especially in politics. I dont see it here.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@outofslumber You don't understand the extremely sensitive intelligence operations that were threatened by Jeffery leading Hendrix's lawyers back to the CIA banks Jeffery was putting Jimi's money into in the Bahamas. They were key to the CIA's international anti-communist black ops during the Cold War. Jimi wasn't supposed to fire Jeffery. Jeffery was supposed to be Jimi's manager for a long time. Jeffery tried to intimidate Jimi with the mafia. CIA had to kill Jeffery to bury the whole thing.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 You see CIA couldn't hit Jeffery by normal means because it would have raised too many questions and sparked an investigation. They had just wacked Jimi and it was too hot. No one would question a freak plane crash. You have to understand the reason they killed Jeffery is because eventually smart investigators would have figured it out and asked him questions he couldn't answer. CIA did not want people to know MI-5 Jeffery was feeding the black ops fund and killed Jimi to cover it up
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Was the plane remote controlled or did they "GUIDE" it into a hotspot via radio. If the former, the difficulty involved in remote piloting a plane to hit another plane is, well, if you cant see the problem. A remote controlled plane used for murder would be flown into the ground/ocean. If they verbally guided the plane into a hot area via radio, even thats kind of absurd. But you never answered these. Small details of general things said that dont add up arent helping you. HEARSAY.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@outofslumber The official investigation said they could never explain why Jeffery's jet made a strange hard right turn at the last moment sending it into the other plane. The planes were at the same altitude. I'm not an aviation expert but anyone could realize it wouldn't be too drastic a technical task to rig the guidance system to lock-on to another jet's radio guidance signal. You say it's "absurd" but what do you know? I think it would be fairly technically easy. Especially for intel.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Again. Your just saying stuff. Back this up. Link to this official document where they said they cant explain this and that. If you cant back up a single thing youve said, with a document you claim others should have i.e "THE OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION SAID". Did they? Show me! You also claim this one was an eye witness and said such and such. Show me the interview, or the documentary, or the on record copy of a statement. OR SOMETHING TANGIBLE
outofslumber 1 year ago
fuck mc donalds
mselliot2 1 year ago 2
Elvis told me he did it with a little help from Little Richard and Les Paul.....
barkbarkbarkbarkable 1 year ago
@barkbarkbarkbarkable Don't be silly! Fidel Castro hired a hitman named "Grassy Knolls", who happened to be a freemason spy in the CIA secretly investigating the carbon-footprint left by Marshall amplifiers which cause global warming and the decline of the polar bear population...
jimistreets 1 year ago
One question I have; Is there a record of the guy recieving the insurance money??
clayp72 1 year ago
Good question. Insurance companies are the first people to look into evidence of foul play because they have an interest involved in determining what happened. I have never seen anyone produce any evidence of any insurance company paying-off Jeffery. If Jeffery was ripping Jimi off so badly why would he need any insurance policy? This stinks to high heaven. CIA was most-likely involved because they are the level that could prevent any investigation by either the Brits or an insurance company.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 I agree. Stil, all that red wine in the lungs should've sparked a wide scale investigation but....
clayp72 1 year ago
Well, the reason it didn't was because Jimi was black and all the medical personnel involved were unconsciously prejudiced and thought it was another drug overdose of a black person. Dr Bannister admitted he thought it was a drug overdose and didn't really register the significance of the wine at the time. The autopsist, Dr Teare, didn't see the wine in the lungs because Bannister had already suctioned it out. But Teare did record critical murder forensic data. It wasn't until Bannister was
Exiles800 1 year ago
confronted in 1992 with accusations of negligence in Shapiro's book 'Electric Gypsy' that he wrote a letter of protest to the author telling him about the wine. Other information in the book about intrigue and questions over Jimi's death made a light go off in Bannister's head realizing he had witnessed evidence of murder. And this was long before Tappy Wright came out and admitted he heard Jeffery confess in 1973 to waterboarding Jimi with wine. The Inquest may have cooperated with COINTELPRO.
Exiles800 1 year ago
shit i knew it....
utrazavunje1 1 year ago
Maybe ask his brother what He thinks and then call him pathetic.
Next you'll be telling me that 9/11 was carried out by GWBush, the same guy who in one breath is as thick as shit yet in the other clever enough to pull of the biggest black flag op of all time without any one person leaking a smidge of evidence. Do me a favour mate!
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
I've found that the Brits constitute at least 75% of the loudest murder deniers. Britain is a crooked, dodgy nation that doesn't want to admit one of its MI-5 members murdered Jimi Hendrix and its government covered-it up. Anyone could see Mistermusicmaker is a dumb-ass who deals in flimsy, transparent logic in order to avoid evdience he can't discuss. Jimi had lungs full of wine with only a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. The death scene showed splashed pure wine spilled during waterboarding.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 SoI take it that your a forensic specialist or SOCO? Hmmm yeah all us Brits are the same, yeah right, not only do you make sweeping generalisations but ontop of that you make up figures of 75%! that tells me all I need to know about you pal.
Get off the net and stop taking what you happen to read as fact. People like that are sad and have no mind of thier own.
Again why does it bother you that my opinion differs from yours? btw I am English not British, you mug
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
@Exiles800 You say "I have found 75% of brits" How did you find that out? what study did you carry out to come up with such a figure? You didnt cos you just made it up.
Im a dumb ass? You also say I deal with flimsy transparnt logic? what does that even mean? of course you use logic to draw conclusions you really are a retard arent you?
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
@Exiles800 Also I havent demanded anything from anyone so shut the fuck up.
Hendrix would prob hat you anyway and tell you to get a life and do your own thing and leave it to the police, you know them people who get PAID to do the job, unlike you who lives in a conspiracy ridden world. Why arent his family shouting about this then? Im sure if my bro was murdered I would demand answers but Jimis bro has more brain cells than you and clearly reached that conclusion through "logic"
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
Thank you, the more you talk the less convincing I have to do that dumb-asses and denying, nationally-biased Brits should probably be excluded from this. Sorry to get ugly but you've trampled on sacred ground with dumb stuff. Your mistake. Again, those who flagrantly deny are universally unable to intelligently confront the forensic facts. Jimi was murdered. The forensics and circumstantial facts prove it. You only help his murderers by waging against those who try to show it.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 OMfreakinG.Give it a rest for fucksake. All youve done is repeated yourself but put certain words in diffrent places!
No one cares what you think, I dont so put a sock in it, retarded fuck.no offence to the real tards out thre. Once again Im English, not British. Ass
Now leave me alone or Ill hunt you down and rip your face off with a rusty old can
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
@mistermusicmaker My English friend, I see you have made the same mistake I made, namely, assuming that exiles800 could actually be reasoned with! This person has a strange, twisted obsession with preaching the "news" that Jimi was murdered. He makes up terms like "alcoholic waterboarding" (no such thing), "motives" why Jeffrey, the CIA, Illuminadi, etc, wanted Jimi dead, then weaves tales of intrique that would make James Bond proud. All of this while ignoring and berating those that differ...
jimistreets 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Can you show me that photo of the "death scene" so I can see the volumes of wine we are talking about. I think its critical to your case. if its a lot of wine, and said wine definately came from his lungs, Id say yes, thats strange, suspicious. But where do you get the information about the wine, where it came from and specific volumes. Its pretty crucial. But Im not a conspiracy theory denier. People conspire, always have, but each case should be judged rationally by the evidence.
outofslumber 1 year ago
@outofslumber Dr Bannister witnessed it. Monika confessed the wine to Sharon Lawrence both the day after Jimi was killed and shortly before her own death. Dr Bannister was in the unique position of witnessing the wine because he unblocked the vomit in Jimi's windpipe and then proceeded to suction it out. We have witnesses who saw Jimi leave the last party with 2 bottles of wine and Monika admitted buying 2 bottles she had at the flat. Ask Dr Bannister, he had no reason to lie. Jeffery confessed.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Comment removed
outofslumber 1 year ago
@Exiles800
Is the Dr on record about the quantities of wine. If you cant link to any evidence, testimony something......then. Its just a theory with little to offer in way of support. Ask Dr Bannister? Where is he? Is he alive? Im not saying your theory is wrong, but build a case with links to some evidence. Im also well aware of the lengths the CIA will go to for their bankster bosses. And well aware the organization has very little to do with preserving American soveriegnty. But.............
outofslumber 1 year ago
Its my opinion so why should you give a fcuk what others think? Thats the mentality that fundamentalist slamist have ie believe in what we do or face the consiquences. Its that, that is pathetic. Let the guy rest in peace.
Oh and is it just coincidence that the roadie who claims this just happened to be releasing a book? anyway as I said its my opinion not yours so keep your drivel to yourself
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
The only bullshit is all the crappy conspiracies that seem to go with anything in the mainstream, its truly pathetic.
Jimi was king, is king. He died, just as We all do, end of.
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
One thing is true about all Hendrix murder deniers, they wouldn't last ten seconds in a real discussion of the evidence. It's obvious some people don't care if he was murdered or not - which is what is pathetic here. Only a fool would argue that Jimi's murder and the powers that covered it up, powers that are still in control today, has no significance. These are low mentalities that just don't want to admit they like sucking off Jimi's music but don't like taking responsibility for his murder.
Exiles800 1 year ago
@Exiles800 One thing that is true is that We all will never ever know what really happened. Justify why anyone who"sucks off Jimis music" should care if He was murdered? I love Jimi more than any other musician bar Bob Marley but that doesnt mean I should believe that He was murdered and to call me pathetic for not buying into this conspiracy is just riddiculus and childish.
My original comment was based on all conspiracies not just this one. The guys lungs were full of vomit, its my opinion!
mistermusicmaker 1 year ago
Why should I have to endure the rather obviously lacking opinions of people who haven't studied the first thing about the evidence? The reason I'm pissed about this is because there IS good evidence to show what happened if you bothered research it. You obviously know nothing about what you're talking about but have the chutzpah to demand people live down to your ignorant level. You're typical of the Hendrix Community that just desires smooth sailing for its dumbed-down outlook...
Exiles800 1 year ago
a bunch of bullshit. Hendrix was killed by the mob, by accident. My friends dad was in the room when it happened.
freepeoplenow 1 year ago
i thought freemasons did it
TheNexthendrix13 1 year ago
R.I.P Jimi
Today I`ll go to a Jimi Hendrix Post-Experience-consert in Oslo\Norway, on the day 40 years after he died, hail to the king!
gofuckyourselfish2 1 year ago
@gofuckyourselfish2 ...right on, dude...! And if you smoke weed, have a puff in my honor while at the concert.... I'll be doing the same for you later this afternoon. Cheers!
TheRealDerfMan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The murder evidence doubters make their critical mistake by not recognizing Monika is telling two stories. In the official story she says Jimi only had a trickle of vomit running down his chin. She did that exactly because she was aware that Jimi was covered in profuse vomit as the ambulance men witnessed. She knew that she had no excuse for not detecting and reacting to this profuse vomit event when supposedly sleeping right next to Jimi. So she lied and made-up the trickle of vomit.
Exiles800 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Meanwhile Monika was quoted elsewhere as saying Jimi was "a mess". When she speaks of this "mess" she's referring to the "horrific" vomit witnessed by the ambulance men. So for her to have anything to clean up with wine fatally contradicts her official story which only speaks of a small trickle of vomit. The murder evidence doubters don't even notice this. These diametric conflicts are exactly what were leading Monika to be forced into court to explain herself.
Exiles800 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You have to understand that what we have here is pure evidence in Monika's words and actions that she was aware Jimi was waterboarded to death and created this easily-disprovable story to cover herself. England is a crooked and dodgy nation (like the US) because this screamingly-obvious evidence is protected by squirrely libel laws and corrupted authorities. The delay to clean the flat was for murder evidence - not for drugs. Monika never made it to court and Scotland Yard isn't interested.
Exiles800 1 year ago
There's no "likely" about it. The forensics PROVE Jimi was murdered. I can't display them here but any clinical/legal look at the forensic evidence shows Jimi was murdered - which is why the authorities involved are so desperate to avoid it. All the circumstantial evidence proves it too. In any other case all these collateral deaths as well as confessions would have been used long ago to press a case for murder. Much glaring evidence is being ignored because Jimi was a political assassination.
Exiles800 1 year ago
There's a very simple formula here. The reason Monika's stories were all proven to be false was because Jimi was murdered. Just like in any other murder case where the stories don't add up Jimi's case is no different. The pure proof of a CIA political assassination is a confession and incriminating forensic evidence can exist in broad daylight that then goes uninvestigated. The reason those around Hendrix didn't get involved is because they knew this and didn't want to get killed themselves.
Exiles800 1 year ago
Devon had a good sense of what happened because she was close to the scene and the players. She was going around telling people Jeffery murdered Hendrix and was soon after found dead under the 8th floor window of the Chelsea Hotel. The NYC police were uninterested because they didn't want to cross purposes with a CIA COINTELPRO murder. If you gave Tappy Wright a polygraph he would pass it. Jeffery was killed in an unusual mid-air crash 1 month after he confessed to Wright. Another CIA murder.
Exiles800 1 year ago 2
Furthermore........... What could possibly be gleaned out of the new book, that has NOT been covered in the Henderson book? Monica Dannemann was used to lure Hendrix to his death, no doubt about it. She either worked knowingly with the Hendrix manager, or was the most glamorous of buffoons in history.
EricinOzWilliams 1 year ago
Exiles 800..... I just think that the David Henderson book is the best one that I have read on this subject in recent years. Likely Jimi Hendrix was murdered.
EricinOzWilliams 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
he was murdered. There was not enough alcohol in his system for alcohol poisoning. they drown him and thats how he threw up. poor jimi. He gave his life to help better the world and he gets taken out just like the rrest of them that try to do that. R.I.P. Tupac, Bob Marley, and Jimi Hendrix. let ur music live forever and ur spirit live inside others.
do NOT let their deaths go in vain
justbringit151515 1 year ago
In 40 YearsAfterDeath I will return in 2011 accross the pond. slighty,,,
CharlesGude 1 year ago
michael fairchild and rockprophecy(dot)com or "prophetjimi" here on youtube
smp156 1 year ago
i think it was deeper powers then JUST the manager that had him killed. the fbi wasnt too fond of hendrix either.
Rebel4evermore 1 year ago
@Rebel4evermore I tend to agree. Especially since the manager also died and conveniently enough Monika (the girl who claimed to be there at the night Jimi died, this claim has been overthrown by the ambulance personel) was due to do a talkshow or something to spill the beans, she was found died, "suicide". Many of the supposedly involved parties conveniently died. But I wonder what the thruth is. Government, manager, Monika Dannemann?
dennoow 1 year ago
@dennoow man idk.. but like john lennon said.. all I want is the truth.. and they arent giving it anytime soon
Rebel4evermore 1 year ago
The real cause of death is choking in his vomit, as a result of the pills 'n wine combination. That's for sure! Now, the question raises if it was an accident or if M. Jeffrey stuffed that shit bruttaly into his throat? If that were true, he would certainly be awake at the moment it happend (are you able to sleep while somebody's putting stuff in your throat?) and it would be kind of impossible for him to choke in his vomit, isn't it? If he really puked, he would still have the reaction to spit!
SGCmyASS 1 year ago
@SGCmyASS what you are saying is true, but keep in mind jimi was an insomniac and had to take a huge amount of pills to fall asleep, so once asleep he would be out cold, then once he was givin more pills, which could have been anything, and wine he drowned in wine or his liver failed
sublime88sublime 1 year ago
@sublime88sublime there was not enough wine found in his body to cause alcohol poisoning. he was drownd. murdered.
justbringit151515 1 year ago
i read somewhere it was the freemasons murdered him
francisgeraldsmall 1 year ago