Added: 1 year ago
From: maxishine
Views: 59,210
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (519)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it's Crysis Warhead actually

  • Tell my why you have 2 Xeons for gaming? a 2600k or even a 2500k is enough for gaming

  • What i heard was that crysis didn't support tri sli nor quad sli.

    It would run it on the first PCI-e slot. so,  abit faild there

  • lol, I get the same fps with a single gtx580 with 3gb

  • one year + 1 days old vid =) cheers

  • 1.5 gb or 3 gb????????

  • Finally, a computer that can play minecraft with zero lag!

  • How can a 1500w PSU run GTX 580's in 4-way SLI? Isn't that to few watts?

  • @aakervikis No.

    4way SLI needs about 1000W

  • @aakervikis No, for 2 x 580 GTX setup you will be fine with less than 850 watt PSU, for 4x 580 GTX, 1200 watts should suffice.

  • Why would you want server cpu's for gaming rig?

  • @hemmipalmroos Cause they give you more power herp derp >:{)

  • @hemmipalmroos acctullay they are workstation CPU's e.g game design and Real-Time CGI

  • @hemmipalmroos

    I say that is a perfect idea did you see the results of those cpus on passmark?

  • I'm thinking 3-way SLI is overall better than 4-way. Not only is 4-way money-draining, it requires a huge case, a huge motherboard, a beefy PSU, and is more often than not bottlenecked by the CPU, thus getting lower FPS than 3-way at times. Also needs liquid-cooling, which adds even MORE cost.

    3-way fits into the 1250w range and does not require all of the above. Water-cooling is nice, but not totally necessary. 4-way, good luck running without water-cooling.

  • R.I.C.H

  • test the FSX and see if you will get any near that fps

  • Crysis is poorly coded

  • @Dupster1234 maybe you are coorly poded

  • wtf I get 60FPS with GTX 560 Ti dual SLI...?

  • @frogsta360 are you running 2560x1600?

  • @mastafaforga haha your retated

  • Can this setup run the new worms game?

  • why is this game not running at 100 fps?!

  • This is quiet weird sometimes the tri is twise a fast as the quad and other times the quad is twise as fast as tri... there's got to be some driver issues here.

  • now you can play cs 1.6 whitout laggs :ugly:

  • Pause when he say's "Not much difference?". Looks like a big difference to me.

  • tri out beats quad at some parts?

  • @Caseyds620 Not at 2560 x1600 :D

  • this is the proof u need quad GTX680's to get and average of 60 fps on 2560x

  • wow ,,, I would give my soul for that card

  • @NeosJordison its a deal

  • @Cristyfeature1 Nice :)

  • wow crysis is truly a monster, games getting pretty old and still ive never seen a system dominate that game.

  • was a little disappointed with the framerates spiking to around 30 fps, then again he is playing on an extremely high resolution.

  • @JustKeepFlying I believe 1,5 gb vram is the problem for that resolution :D

  • You've got a new subscriber my friend :D!

    I'm going to buy the 580 GTX in a month! (can't wait)!!

    I've sold my 2 5770 cards because they were shit! (Yeah, in crossfire!) Believe me.

    I just can't wait damnit :3!!!!!!

  • Why does tri sli sometimes have a better fps than quad...

  • @theogofgames Yeah... too bad you can't even tell the difference. That's why the smart people only spend a few hundred and get the same experience lawl....

  • People seem to like to ignore the fact that Maxishine is playing AT 2560x1600 RESOLUTION!!!!!!!!!! THATS DOUBLE THE PIXEL COUNT PEOPLE. SO TAKE YOUR FRAMERATE AT 1080P AND CUT IT IN HALF!!! NOT TO MENTION 16x AA. Thats another taxing hit on your framerate too...i have a feeling the guys flaunting there core i7 2600k w/ 570 and their lil 6870 and 6950's would get 20 fps max at these settings.

  • Great video. Would there be much difference between SLI and Tri-Sli setups? EVGA sells a 1.5 gig and new 3.0 gig vram cards. For a single monitor setup, is 1.5 gigs of vram good enough our should I opt for the 3.0 gig vram card. Also, the 1.5 gig card is pre overcloced to 850mhz and the 3.0 gig card is at stock speeds. Can't decide if I should get the pre over clocked card or do my own overclocking with a stock card. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

  • @MonsieurWaffles69 ALso note that its 1600p . For you to get 60 FPs costantly u prob game on lower reso / settings

  • @1337vIKz and do consider that fraps is running.

  • The best thing about this video is that its going to be obsolete in 2 years.

  • people the reason his FPS are so low is because of one thing and one thing ONLY CryEngine 2 doesnt support Quad SLI GTX 580 or Tri SLI if you wanna see Quad SLI on Crysis 2 you will sometimes get 300+ FPS proved by Manuaco

  • @net200777 He's running it on 3 30 inch screens @ 2560x1600.

  • ????? I get that fps on one 570 and an i7 2600k....

  • And why do you need this while I get 35FPS on 1080p with my HD6950? :D

  • @SuperMaexle123 If you were flaunting your radeon fanboy-ism, keep in mind they were triple screening in 1600p. If this was a legit question, they don't.

  • @ThePrinceRohan Sell your car.

  • 3 way SLI GTX 580 and sometimes 35 FPS... WTF ?!?!

  • @1337vIKz its becasue the drivers were bad!!! it will perform alot better than that now

  • @1337vIKz Do you see the res and AA hes playing at?

  • @rucka704 still...

  • @1337vIKz It's cos his cards are running with 1.5 Gb or vram. If they had 3Gb of vram, nth will beat it at that res.

  • @1337vIKz its running on 1600p if it ran on 1080p it would be over 60 fps....

  • @1337vIKz He didn't feel like putting "00" after it, so its just "35". :P 

  • @Fchyeahh xD

  • @1337vIKz its because the game setting is at a very high resoulution

  • @1337vIKz Check out the resolution. Holy shit.

  • @1337vIKz crysis is just a stupid bottle neck of a game, people shouldn't even use it as a benchmark anymore, it's not that 3 GTX 580's CAN'T render the game at a higher frame, it's that the game WON'T let the card render it at that, shitty programming, and it can't communicate properly because of this.

    sort of like how it's impossible to run a PS3 Emulator as of right now, not that the PS3 is more powerful, just there's a bottleneck in the language. extra power to compensate.

  • @1981z28camaro I see

  • @1337vIKz yeah, you might have already known that, I don't know, lol

  • @1981z28camaro I heard it really is unoptmized, byt didnt know why there's no PS3 emulator >_>

  • @1337vIKz unoptimized is one thing, but when you got FOUR GTX 580's running a 4 year old game, and you can barely make it above 70 fps... you could have 10 of them, and it would probably only get like an extra 40 fps, lol

  • @1981z28camaro xD PS3 suck

  • @1337vIKz lol, well yeah compared to PS3, but I still think it's cool to run emulators on PC :-)

  • @1981z28camaro I wanna play GoW 3 on PC :(

  • @1337vIKz meh, never been a huge GOW fan, not sure why just doesn't do anything for me. lol

  • @1337vIKz  :-)

  • You all saw that glitch at the beginning right? Not just me.

  • since you're getting those kind of frames... I'm guessing that it must be the bad coding?!

  • @ThePrinceRohan

    1. dont get married

    2. eat ramen only

    :P

  • Good vid makes me to go TRI SLI got sli now but seems worth it :)

  • in 10 years my grandmother has a faster system for internet

  • hey Maxishine, mind giving me one of your old 8800 ultras ?

  • Crysis dont have good sli optimization Test Stalker 2 card = 2x 100% fps...

    Crysis SLI suck end U test quad sli in crysis WHY ?????

  • @666Azmodan666

    true i got extreme overclocked GTX 480;s and in crysis im glad it its 30+ fps :S

  • 580 3 way sli is better??

  • @MrComputereviews against Quad sli 580? yep, even a 3x 580 its much better than a quad sli 590 :D

  • @MrComputereviews quad sli is better....but tri sli isnt far behind

  • WHAT!?!?!?

    Quad SLI GTX 580 gettting 45-60FPS? Huh!?

  • @tazss159 He's using 3x 30 inch monitors

  • @AnderssonEh 3x 30 inch monitors would be a resolution of 7680X1600 but the resolution in this vid was only 2560X1600.

    4 GTX 580 in SLI only getting 45-60FPS!?!?!?!? Is Crysis 1 still the ultimate system killer.

  • tri sli? i though there was only

    SLI

    3 way SLI

    4 way SLI

    Quad SLI

  • @DBZisthebestanimever tri-sli is 3-way sli lmao, tri = 3

  • @clondan1 uhhh no. If that was true Quad SLI and 4 way SLI would be the same thing. Quad SLI is SLI between 2 cards that have 2 cards in them. Like 2 GTX 590s. 4 GTX 580s are 4 way SLI

  • @DBZisthebestanimever theyre just differnent phrasings lol but w/e i dont wanna get into a utube fight

  • @clondan1 I wonder why there are mobos that support Quad SLI and no 4 way sli

  • @DBZisthebestanimever the sr-2 and x58 classified both support 4 way lol,

  • @clondan1 I was talking about motherboards that support quad SLi and no 4 way sli.

  • @DBZisthebestanimever

    stop trolling

  • @Edge0fPain I'm not trolling i'm just saying TRI sli is impossible unless you have jam in 3 GPUs in 1 card

  • @DBZisthebestanimever

    you're an idiot.

  • @Edge0fPain and you're a retard

  • @DBZisthebestanimever

    tri means 3 brainiac...

    does the word tripple mean anythign to you?

    

  • @raybbo NO! There's no such thing as a tri-SLI unless there are cards that have 1.5 cards in them. Quad SLI is having 2 cards that have 2 cards in them like 2 GTX590s. But 4 way SLI is like having 4 GTX580s and it's impossible to have TRI-SLI

  • @DBZisthebestanimever

    "Why is it impossible to put 3 1core gpu's on a motherboard with 3 pci express slots?

  • @raybbo if you do that that would be 3 way sli NOT tri-sli. Tri-sli doesn't exist while 4 way sli and Quad SLi does

  • @DBZisthebestanimever just cuz your mobo has 1 pcie slot doesnt mean everyone else's does... and you can put 3 cards in 3 pcie slots u idiot...

  • @INY79 I never denied that. I am fully aware people can have up to 8 slots. My "Point" is that if people put 3 cards in their 3 PCI slots (which i am fully aware is possible) it would be 3 way SLI. Not TRI-SLI but 3 way SLI. There's a difference.

  • @DBZisthebestanimever you do realize that you can SLI a 590 with a 580 to have 3 gpu's in two slots effectively making a tri-SLI... after reading every single one of your comments on this video, i am amazed and feel sorry for your lack of knowledge and common sense

  • @mastafaforga no. You can't SLI 590 with a 580.

  • @DBZisthebestanimever there is tri SLI, ever heard of the EVGA 3 way, or 4 way SLI? its called having at least four pci-e expansion slots with dual slot spacing... im currently in the process of building a 3 way sli machine... ill make a video, if you want me to open the case, and show you...

  • @TheGrantkaminski Idiot. Let's take an example.

    2 x GTX 590s is Quad SLi

    4 x GTX 580s is 4 way SLI.

    3 x GTX 580s is 3 way SLi

    3 way SLI isn't TRI SLI and TRI SLI doesn't exist

  • @DBZisthebestanimever whats the difference between tri, and 3 way??? it has the exact same meaning

  • @TheGrantkaminski considering 4 way sli and quad sli aren't the same why should tri and 3 way sli be the same?

  • @DBZisthebestanimever why should tri, and 3 way be any different? it doesnt matter what word you use, they have the same meaning for the name number of effective GPUs

  • @TheGrantkaminski Let's take the G1.Assassin for example it supports 2xgtx590s yet it doesn't support 4xgtx580s.

  • @DBZisthebestanimever yeah, and??? that says nothing about what the difference is between quad SLI, and 4 way SLi, or 3 way vs tri...

  • @TheGrantkaminski you're a waste of time. Quad sli is 2 cards that have 2 GPus in them while 4 way sli is 4 cards that have 1 GPu inside each

  • @DBZisthebestanimever thats great. it still doesnt change the fact that both words have the same meaning...

  • @DBZisthebestanimever and, if im a waste of time, why dont you just stop replying, and save yourself a load of time...

  • @TheGrantkaminski I have time to waste.

  • @DBZisthebestanimever haha, me too, actually

  • @DBZisthebestanimever TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI  TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI

  • I would give my hand for one gtx 580 xD

  • your getting bottlenecked by the cpu easily with that kinda video card power thats why theres no difference after tri sli possibly even dual sli

  • @soulflame99 Lol, how much CPU power do you need then for them not to be a bottleneck? He has two 6-core processors in that system.

  • @soulflame99 he has two server processors both overclocked...each one costs 1,500 on newegg, theres no eay in fuck hes bottlenecking, the sli just scales terribly, just get 3-way sli and drop the final one in as dedicated physx

  • Infinite money cheat or something...? How the hell do you get all those video cards... Well it's just one of those things which make you wonder...

  • The way it's ment to be played

  • Nope, NO FPS DIFFERENCE BETWEEEN TRIPPLE GTX 580 IN SLI AND QUAD GTX 580 IN SLI.

  • @spawnie456

    yes.

  • Are these cards OC'd?

  • super gay

  • @TrashMountainComplex

    Super jealous?

  • Ok, cool setup bro, now I dare you to get an IBM T221, play Crysis on it ,but except at 3840x2400 to see what the world's fastest computer atm can truly handle :D (You may need a resolution hacker)

  • not enjoyed, won't sub -.-..

  • whythere is fucking need of quad sli or tri

  • @ThePrinceRohan It's called getting a job and saving up.

  • LOL? Sometimes the quad sli gets lest fps than the tri sli? WTF? LOLOLOL

  • unnoticeable changes really..

  • @rodel5552002 yeah, I couldn't see a big difference. I thought it would have been higher. I've seen MSI GTX 560 Ti's in SLI that ran Crysis better lol.

    I read that some people are saying he's using Xeon's which are server CPU's. I wonder if the CPU can work properly in game? I dunno. disapointing video anyways.

  • @DoomTra1n ** shit, reads text on screen. OK maxi, I gotcha. lol

  • the reason the frames are so slow in some spots is because CryEngine 2 is not optimized and not upgraded to today cards and CryEngine 2 is so pretty much expect 100+ Frames with Quad SLI and TRI SLI because in his Heaven 2.1 he had more than 100 fps as max

  • @t4kerz You can only run 2x GTX 590's in SLI. That will give you quad SLI.

  • if I spend 10,000 bucks on a PC I'd pretty much expect more fps then 35 at some points 0.0

  • I hear so many people complaining about COST + FPS but is'nt  the objective smoother gameplay !!! !!!

  • Useless.

  • omfg 2000 euros in cards just to get 35-70 fps, insane oO

  • instead of buying your first car, just buy this :P

  • You should get more than that a single 6990 gets 45-80 fps

  • @Anthraxsgaming Yeah, you just went off topic to show off you 2600k.

    This is, or at least was, about Crysis.

  • @Anthraxsgaming 920 D0 revision.

  • You Ran IT in DX11 wtf .-__-

  • @mikee1333 you can't run crysis in DX11 because it doesn't support it ;)

  • dear santa...

  • Lol, 2,000$ USD just for the graphics cards...

  • i dont think people understand that he is actually running a really high resolution thats why his frame rates a lower than normal.

  • Funny, this game released in 07 and 4 years later, we are still using it as one of the most extreme games yet... im VERY sure that people will still use it in the next 2 years.. lol

  • I remember playing Mario at 256 x 224 which was in sprites or 2D rendering. How far have we come in two decades or so, and how far will we go? Wow I can only imagine.

  • i think a lot of people are missing the point that he's running 3 30inch monitors eye finity that is why it's "low fps"

  • @kekelah Nvidia Surround, actually

  • @kekelah Eyefinity? lol that would be AMD not Nvidia

  • low,very low, 4x best card, but only 40-50 frames!

  • @oliundmarlo

    He is running the game on three 30inch monitors with resolutions at 2560X1600, WQXGA (Wide Quad eXtended Graphics Array) that have four times as many pixels as a regular WXGA (1280×800) display. With increased resolution managing frame rates at average of 40+ FPS is incredibly awesome.

    If this was a simple 1080p monitor then except FPS of over 80, easily done.

  • Inb4 hate comments.

    But Crysis is HORRIBLE. The game is pure Graphics. That's about it.

    I ain't even saying that because i can't run it or shit, i actually got a i7 @4.0Ghz and a 5970. But it's not even fun to play.

  • @SickneZZ2 Agreed, Crysis is no fun at all, sure the graphic is top notch, but thats all, there is hell of alot games better than Crysis that I do enjoy ..

  • @houari2009 Tup, same here.

  • @houari2009 I meant Yup, but you got it, lol.

  • i imagine this will not be outdated for like 10 years (the machine)

  • we need a processor with 1 terahertz and a 800 ghz graphics chip thats what we need

  • SR-2 with 3&4 gtx 580 an the fps are still dropping to 30-40 lol what a wast of money

  • don't ATI GFX cards have eyefinity so you don't have to buy several cards for multiple monitors?? this is way too overkill but nice video though ^_^

  • this makes me wonder what would happen if on crysis 3 they made the graphics even better than crysis and the consoles all got a hardware update to play it.

  • Though there would be some difference with a 4th card costing u $900 nearly..

  • why did you cheap out on the ram ?

  • @slfviirus 12 gb ram at 2000 mhz is not "cheaping out"

    its 400 dollars dude

  • @worldofurin Oh, lol i thought it was 1333mhz