I'm thinking 3-way SLI is overall better than 4-way. Not only is 4-way money-draining, it requires a huge case, a huge motherboard, a beefy PSU, and is more often than not bottlenecked by the CPU, thus getting lower FPS than 3-way at times. Also needs liquid-cooling, which adds even MORE cost.
3-way fits into the 1250w range and does not require all of the above. Water-cooling is nice, but not totally necessary. 4-way, good luck running without water-cooling.
This is quiet weird sometimes the tri is twise a fast as the quad and other times the quad is twise as fast as tri... there's got to be some driver issues here.
@theogofgames Yeah... too bad you can't even tell the difference. That's why the smart people only spend a few hundred and get the same experience lawl....
People seem to like to ignore the fact that Maxishine is playing AT 2560x1600 RESOLUTION!!!!!!!!!! THATS DOUBLE THE PIXEL COUNT PEOPLE. SO TAKE YOUR FRAMERATE AT 1080P AND CUT IT IN HALF!!! NOT TO MENTION 16x AA. Thats another taxing hit on your framerate too...i have a feeling the guys flaunting there core i7 2600k w/ 570 and their lil 6870 and 6950's would get 20 fps max at these settings.
Great video. Would there be much difference between SLI and Tri-Sli setups? EVGA sells a 1.5 gig and new 3.0 gig vram cards. For a single monitor setup, is 1.5 gigs of vram good enough our should I opt for the 3.0 gig vram card. Also, the 1.5 gig card is pre overcloced to 850mhz and the 3.0 gig card is at stock speeds. Can't decide if I should get the pre over clocked card or do my own overclocking with a stock card. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
people the reason his FPS are so low is because of one thing and one thing ONLY CryEngine 2 doesnt support Quad SLI GTX 580 or Tri SLI if you wanna see Quad SLI on Crysis 2 you will sometimes get 300+ FPS proved by Manuaco
@SuperMaexle123 If you were flaunting your radeon fanboy-ism, keep in mind they were triple screening in 1600p. If this was a legit question, they don't.
@1337vIKz crysis is just a stupid bottle neck of a game, people shouldn't even use it as a benchmark anymore, it's not that 3 GTX 580's CAN'T render the game at a higher frame, it's that the game WON'T let the card render it at that, shitty programming, and it can't communicate properly because of this.
sort of like how it's impossible to run a PS3 Emulator as of right now, not that the PS3 is more powerful, just there's a bottleneck in the language. extra power to compensate.
@1337vIKz unoptimized is one thing, but when you got FOUR GTX 580's running a 4 year old game, and you can barely make it above 70 fps... you could have 10 of them, and it would probably only get like an extra 40 fps, lol
@clondan1 uhhh no. If that was true Quad SLI and 4 way SLI would be the same thing. Quad SLI is SLI between 2 cards that have 2 cards in them. Like 2 GTX 590s. 4 GTX 580s are 4 way SLI
@raybbo NO! There's no such thing as a tri-SLI unless there are cards that have 1.5 cards in them. Quad SLI is having 2 cards that have 2 cards in them like 2 GTX590s. But 4 way SLI is like having 4 GTX580s and it's impossible to have TRI-SLI
@INY79 I never denied that. I am fully aware people can have up to 8 slots. My "Point" is that if people put 3 cards in their 3 PCI slots (which i am fully aware is possible) it would be 3 way SLI. Not TRI-SLI but 3 way SLI. There's a difference.
@DBZisthebestanimever you do realize that you can SLI a 590 with a 580 to have 3 gpu's in two slots effectively making a tri-SLI... after reading every single one of your comments on this video, i am amazed and feel sorry for your lack of knowledge and common sense
@DBZisthebestanimever there is tri SLI, ever heard of the EVGA 3 way, or 4 way SLI? its called having at least four pci-e expansion slots with dual slot spacing... im currently in the process of building a 3 way sli machine... ill make a video, if you want me to open the case, and show you...
@DBZisthebestanimever why should tri, and 3 way be any different? it doesnt matter what word you use, they have the same meaning for the name number of effective GPUs
@DBZisthebestanimever TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI
@soulflame99 he has two server processors both overclocked...each one costs 1,500 on newegg, theres no eay in fuck hes bottlenecking, the sli just scales terribly, just get 3-way sli and drop the final one in as dedicated physx
Ok, cool setup bro, now I dare you to get an IBM T221, play Crysis on it ,but except at 3840x2400 to see what the world's fastest computer atm can truly handle :D (You may need a resolution hacker)
@rodel5552002 yeah, I couldn't see a big difference. I thought it would have been higher. I've seen MSI GTX 560 Ti's in SLI that ran Crysis better lol.
I read that some people are saying he's using Xeon's which are server CPU's. I wonder if the CPU can work properly in game? I dunno. disapointing video anyways.
the reason the frames are so slow in some spots is because CryEngine 2 is not optimized and not upgraded to today cards and CryEngine 2 is so pretty much expect 100+ Frames with Quad SLI and TRI SLI because in his Heaven 2.1 he had more than 100 fps as max
Funny, this game released in 07 and 4 years later, we are still using it as one of the most extreme games yet... im VERY sure that people will still use it in the next 2 years.. lol
I remember playing Mario at 256 x 224 which was in sprites or 2D rendering. How far have we come in two decades or so, and how far will we go? Wow I can only imagine.
He is running the game on three 30inch monitors with resolutions at 2560X1600, WQXGA (Wide Quad eXtended Graphics Array) that have four times as many pixels as a regular WXGA (1280×800) display. With increased resolution managing frame rates at average of 40+ FPS is incredibly awesome.
If this was a simple 1080p monitor then except FPS of over 80, easily done.
@SickneZZ2 Agreed, Crysis is no fun at all, sure the graphic is top notch, but thats all, there is hell of alot games better than Crysis that I do enjoy ..
this makes me wonder what would happen if on crysis 3 they made the graphics even better than crysis and the consoles all got a hardware update to play it.
it's Crysis Warhead actually
Anssui 4 days ago
Tell my why you have 2 Xeons for gaming? a 2600k or even a 2500k is enough for gaming
momostien 1 month ago in playlist More videos from maxishine
What i heard was that crysis didn't support tri sli nor quad sli.
It would run it on the first PCI-e slot. so, abit faild there
MegaTafe 1 month ago
lol, I get the same fps with a single gtx580 with 3gb
darkown777 1 month ago
one year + 1 days old vid =) cheers
mixdur123 2 months ago
1.5 gb or 3 gb????????
joshodst 2 months ago
Finally, a computer that can play minecraft with zero lag!
cooldaddy1234567 2 months ago
How can a 1500w PSU run GTX 580's in 4-way SLI? Isn't that to few watts?
aakervikis 2 months ago
@aakervikis No.
4way SLI needs about 1000W
FaleiaFrost 2 months ago
@aakervikis No, for 2 x 580 GTX setup you will be fine with less than 850 watt PSU, for 4x 580 GTX, 1200 watts should suffice.
IronIsMyLife 2 months ago
Why would you want server cpu's for gaming rig?
hemmipalmroos 3 months ago
@hemmipalmroos Cause they give you more power herp derp >:{)
Bailliethomas002 3 months ago
@hemmipalmroos acctullay they are workstation CPU's e.g game design and Real-Time CGI
firestorm234 3 months ago
@hemmipalmroos
I say that is a perfect idea did you see the results of those cpus on passmark?
darkkaiju899 3 months ago
I'm thinking 3-way SLI is overall better than 4-way. Not only is 4-way money-draining, it requires a huge case, a huge motherboard, a beefy PSU, and is more often than not bottlenecked by the CPU, thus getting lower FPS than 3-way at times. Also needs liquid-cooling, which adds even MORE cost.
3-way fits into the 1250w range and does not require all of the above. Water-cooling is nice, but not totally necessary. 4-way, good luck running without water-cooling.
Antroz0197 3 months ago
R.I.C.H
MrJoaovictor1234 3 months ago
test the FSX and see if you will get any near that fps
RCHelios1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how is 3 better than 4?
Swagdaddy777 4 months ago
Crysis is poorly coded
Dupster1234 4 months ago 51
@Dupster1234 maybe you are coorly poded
ulkord 2 months ago
wtf I get 60FPS with GTX 560 Ti dual SLI...?
frogsta360 5 months ago
@frogsta360 are you running 2560x1600?
TheNvidiaradeon 5 months ago
@mastafaforga haha your retated
BUNN47mY 5 months ago
Can this setup run the new worms game?
Taur3x 5 months ago
why is this game not running at 100 fps?!
Blu0tuth0ninja 5 months ago
This is quiet weird sometimes the tri is twise a fast as the quad and other times the quad is twise as fast as tri... there's got to be some driver issues here.
jolichja 5 months ago
now you can play cs 1.6 whitout laggs :ugly:
ExOrrr 5 months ago 46
Pause when he say's "Not much difference?". Looks like a big difference to me.
MrFluffyFrog 5 months ago
tri out beats quad at some parts?
LegitCraft 6 months ago
@Caseyds620 Not at 2560 x1600 :D
1337vIKz 6 months ago
this is the proof u need quad GTX680's to get and average of 60 fps on 2560x
Arnoud1987000 6 months ago
wow ,,, I would give my soul for that card
NeosJordison 7 months ago
@NeosJordison its a deal
chevogliomai 5 months ago
@Cristyfeature1 Nice :)
1337vIKz 7 months ago
wow crysis is truly a monster, games getting pretty old and still ive never seen a system dominate that game.
pete82ification 7 months ago
was a little disappointed with the framerates spiking to around 30 fps, then again he is playing on an extremely high resolution.
JustKeepFlying 7 months ago
@JustKeepFlying I believe 1,5 gb vram is the problem for that resolution :D
maxaxelpro 7 months ago
You've got a new subscriber my friend :D!
I'm going to buy the 580 GTX in a month! (can't wait)!!
I've sold my 2 5770 cards because they were shit! (Yeah, in crossfire!) Believe me.
I just can't wait damnit :3!!!!!!
sonic4life007 7 months ago
Why does tri sli sometimes have a better fps than quad...
KingFuckaDuck 7 months ago
@theogofgames Yeah... too bad you can't even tell the difference. That's why the smart people only spend a few hundred and get the same experience lawl....
redxilljs 7 months ago
People seem to like to ignore the fact that Maxishine is playing AT 2560x1600 RESOLUTION!!!!!!!!!! THATS DOUBLE THE PIXEL COUNT PEOPLE. SO TAKE YOUR FRAMERATE AT 1080P AND CUT IT IN HALF!!! NOT TO MENTION 16x AA. Thats another taxing hit on your framerate too...i have a feeling the guys flaunting there core i7 2600k w/ 570 and their lil 6870 and 6950's would get 20 fps max at these settings.
TheOGofgames 7 months ago
Great video. Would there be much difference between SLI and Tri-Sli setups? EVGA sells a 1.5 gig and new 3.0 gig vram cards. For a single monitor setup, is 1.5 gigs of vram good enough our should I opt for the 3.0 gig vram card. Also, the 1.5 gig card is pre overcloced to 850mhz and the 3.0 gig card is at stock speeds. Can't decide if I should get the pre over clocked card or do my own overclocking with a stock card. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
cigarjohn42 7 months ago
@MonsieurWaffles69 ALso note that its 1600p . For you to get 60 FPs costantly u prob game on lower reso / settings
1337vIKz 7 months ago
@1337vIKz and do consider that fraps is running.
Nyllet1221 7 months ago
The best thing about this video is that its going to be obsolete in 2 years.
jthegr8 7 months ago
people the reason his FPS are so low is because of one thing and one thing ONLY CryEngine 2 doesnt support Quad SLI GTX 580 or Tri SLI if you wanna see Quad SLI on Crysis 2 you will sometimes get 300+ FPS proved by Manuaco
TheModernwarfare2009 8 months ago
@net200777 He's running it on 3 30 inch screens @ 2560x1600.
FuzzYthesexy1 8 months ago
????? I get that fps on one 570 and an i7 2600k....
net200777 8 months ago
And why do you need this while I get 35FPS on 1080p with my HD6950? :D
SuperMaexle123 8 months ago
@SuperMaexle123 If you were flaunting your radeon fanboy-ism, keep in mind they were triple screening in 1600p. If this was a legit question, they don't.
hiphopguy0 8 months ago
@ThePrinceRohan Sell your car.
XcrazyX10 8 months ago
3 way SLI GTX 580 and sometimes 35 FPS... WTF ?!?!
1337vIKz 8 months ago 51
@1337vIKz its becasue the drivers were bad!!! it will perform alot better than that now
kevinjones1985 8 months ago
@1337vIKz Do you see the res and AA hes playing at?
rucka704 7 months ago
@rucka704 still...
1337vIKz 7 months ago
@1337vIKz It's cos his cards are running with 1.5 Gb or vram. If they had 3Gb of vram, nth will beat it at that res.
luakershiun 7 months ago
@1337vIKz its running on 1600p if it ran on 1080p it would be over 60 fps....
AhmedHazuki 7 months ago
@1337vIKz He didn't feel like putting "00" after it, so its just "35". :P
Fchyeahh 6 months ago
@Fchyeahh xD
1337vIKz 6 months ago
@1337vIKz its because the game setting is at a very high resoulution
DogPack1000 5 months ago
@1337vIKz Check out the resolution. Holy shit.
Tier1GamingNetwork 5 months ago
@1337vIKz crysis is just a stupid bottle neck of a game, people shouldn't even use it as a benchmark anymore, it's not that 3 GTX 580's CAN'T render the game at a higher frame, it's that the game WON'T let the card render it at that, shitty programming, and it can't communicate properly because of this.
sort of like how it's impossible to run a PS3 Emulator as of right now, not that the PS3 is more powerful, just there's a bottleneck in the language. extra power to compensate.
1981z28camaro 5 months ago
@1981z28camaro I see
1337vIKz 5 months ago
@1337vIKz yeah, you might have already known that, I don't know, lol
1981z28camaro 5 months ago
@1981z28camaro I heard it really is unoptmized, byt didnt know why there's no PS3 emulator >_>
1337vIKz 5 months ago
@1337vIKz unoptimized is one thing, but when you got FOUR GTX 580's running a 4 year old game, and you can barely make it above 70 fps... you could have 10 of them, and it would probably only get like an extra 40 fps, lol
1981z28camaro 4 months ago
@1981z28camaro xD PS3 suck
1337vIKz 4 months ago
@1337vIKz lol, well yeah compared to PS3, but I still think it's cool to run emulators on PC :-)
1981z28camaro 4 months ago
@1981z28camaro I wanna play GoW 3 on PC :(
1337vIKz 4 months ago
@1337vIKz meh, never been a huge GOW fan, not sure why just doesn't do anything for me. lol
1981z28camaro 4 months ago
@1981z28camaro xD
1337vIKz 4 months ago
@1337vIKz :-)
1981z28camaro 4 months ago
You all saw that glitch at the beginning right? Not just me.
SykoraJelly 9 months ago
since you're getting those kind of frames... I'm guessing that it must be the bad coding?!
Cvoong 9 months ago
@ThePrinceRohan
1. dont get married
2. eat ramen only
:P
IVIrIVIajic11 9 months ago
Good vid makes me to go TRI SLI got sli now but seems worth it :)
Arnoud1987000 9 months ago
in 10 years my grandmother has a faster system for internet
Arnoud1987000 9 months ago
hey Maxishine, mind giving me one of your old 8800 ultras ?
LauchEleven 9 months ago
Crysis dont have good sli optimization Test Stalker 2 card = 2x 100% fps...
Crysis SLI suck end U test quad sli in crysis WHY ?????
666Azmodan666 9 months ago
@666Azmodan666
true i got extreme overclocked GTX 480;s and in crysis im glad it its 30+ fps :S
Arnoud1987000 9 months ago
580 3 way sli is better??
MrComputereviews 10 months ago
@MrComputereviews against Quad sli 580? yep, even a 3x 580 its much better than a quad sli 590 :D
heroeofsand 9 months ago
@MrComputereviews quad sli is better....but tri sli isnt far behind
Oosen99 9 months ago
WHAT!?!?!?
Quad SLI GTX 580 gettting 45-60FPS? Huh!?
tazss159 10 months ago
@tazss159 He's using 3x 30 inch monitors
AnderssonEh 10 months ago
@AnderssonEh 3x 30 inch monitors would be a resolution of 7680X1600 but the resolution in this vid was only 2560X1600.
4 GTX 580 in SLI only getting 45-60FPS!?!?!?!? Is Crysis 1 still the ultimate system killer.
tazss159 9 months ago
tri sli? i though there was only
SLI
3 way SLI
4 way SLI
Quad SLI
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever tri-sli is 3-way sli lmao, tri = 3
clondan1 10 months ago
@clondan1 uhhh no. If that was true Quad SLI and 4 way SLI would be the same thing. Quad SLI is SLI between 2 cards that have 2 cards in them. Like 2 GTX 590s. 4 GTX 580s are 4 way SLI
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever theyre just differnent phrasings lol but w/e i dont wanna get into a utube fight
clondan1 10 months ago
@clondan1 I wonder why there are mobos that support Quad SLI and no 4 way sli
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever the sr-2 and x58 classified both support 4 way lol,
clondan1 10 months ago
@clondan1 I was talking about motherboards that support quad SLi and no 4 way sli.
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever
stop trolling
Edge0fPain 5 months ago
@Edge0fPain I'm not trolling i'm just saying TRI sli is impossible unless you have jam in 3 GPUs in 1 card
DBZisthebestanimever 5 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever
you're an idiot.
Edge0fPain 5 months ago
@Edge0fPain and you're a retard
DBZisthebestanimever 5 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever
no u
Edge0fPain 5 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever
tri means 3 brainiac...
does the word tripple mean anythign to you?
raybbo 10 months ago
@raybbo NO! There's no such thing as a tri-SLI unless there are cards that have 1.5 cards in them. Quad SLI is having 2 cards that have 2 cards in them like 2 GTX590s. But 4 way SLI is like having 4 GTX580s and it's impossible to have TRI-SLI
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever
"Why is it impossible to put 3 1core gpu's on a motherboard with 3 pci express slots?
raybbo 10 months ago 28
@raybbo if you do that that would be 3 way sli NOT tri-sli. Tri-sli doesn't exist while 4 way sli and Quad SLi does
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever just cuz your mobo has 1 pcie slot doesnt mean everyone else's does... and you can put 3 cards in 3 pcie slots u idiot...
INY79 10 months ago
@INY79 I never denied that. I am fully aware people can have up to 8 slots. My "Point" is that if people put 3 cards in their 3 PCI slots (which i am fully aware is possible) it would be 3 way SLI. Not TRI-SLI but 3 way SLI. There's a difference.
DBZisthebestanimever 10 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever you do realize that you can SLI a 590 with a 580 to have 3 gpu's in two slots effectively making a tri-SLI... after reading every single one of your comments on this video, i am amazed and feel sorry for your lack of knowledge and common sense
mastafaforga 5 months ago
@mastafaforga no. You can't SLI 590 with a 580.
DBZisthebestanimever 5 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever there is tri SLI, ever heard of the EVGA 3 way, or 4 way SLI? its called having at least four pci-e expansion slots with dual slot spacing... im currently in the process of building a 3 way sli machine... ill make a video, if you want me to open the case, and show you...
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@TheGrantkaminski Idiot. Let's take an example.
2 x GTX 590s is Quad SLi
4 x GTX 580s is 4 way SLI.
3 x GTX 580s is 3 way SLi
3 way SLI isn't TRI SLI and TRI SLI doesn't exist
DBZisthebestanimever 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever whats the difference between tri, and 3 way??? it has the exact same meaning
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@TheGrantkaminski considering 4 way sli and quad sli aren't the same why should tri and 3 way sli be the same?
DBZisthebestanimever 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever why should tri, and 3 way be any different? it doesnt matter what word you use, they have the same meaning for the name number of effective GPUs
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@TheGrantkaminski Let's take the G1.Assassin for example it supports 2xgtx590s yet it doesn't support 4xgtx580s.
DBZisthebestanimever 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever yeah, and??? that says nothing about what the difference is between quad SLI, and 4 way SLi, or 3 way vs tri...
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@TheGrantkaminski you're a waste of time. Quad sli is 2 cards that have 2 GPus in them while 4 way sli is 4 cards that have 1 GPu inside each
DBZisthebestanimever 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever thats great. it still doesnt change the fact that both words have the same meaning...
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever and, if im a waste of time, why dont you just stop replying, and save yourself a load of time...
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@TheGrantkaminski I have time to waste.
DBZisthebestanimever 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever haha, me too, actually
TheGrantkaminski 8 months ago
@DBZisthebestanimever TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI TRI SLI
TheOGofgames 7 months ago
I would give my hand for one gtx 580 xD
aragorn7blade 10 months ago
your getting bottlenecked by the cpu easily with that kinda video card power thats why theres no difference after tri sli possibly even dual sli
soulflame99 10 months ago
@soulflame99 Lol, how much CPU power do you need then for them not to be a bottleneck? He has two 6-core processors in that system.
Vortex1988 10 months ago
@soulflame99 he has two server processors both overclocked...each one costs 1,500 on newegg, theres no eay in fuck hes bottlenecking, the sli just scales terribly, just get 3-way sli and drop the final one in as dedicated physx
clondan1 10 months ago
Infinite money cheat or something...? How the hell do you get all those video cards... Well it's just one of those things which make you wonder...
AsianSpaghetti 10 months ago
The way it's ment to be played
pkmChris 10 months ago
Nope, NO FPS DIFFERENCE BETWEEEN TRIPPLE GTX 580 IN SLI AND QUAD GTX 580 IN SLI.
tazss159 10 months ago
@spawnie456
yes.
FuzzYthesexy1 10 months ago
Are these cards OC'd?
spawnie456 10 months ago
super gay
TrashMountainComplex 10 months ago
@TrashMountainComplex
Super jealous?
raybbo 10 months ago
Ok, cool setup bro, now I dare you to get an IBM T221, play Crysis on it ,but except at 3840x2400 to see what the world's fastest computer atm can truly handle :D (You may need a resolution hacker)
Omega50022 10 months ago
not enjoyed, won't sub -.-..
02blazp 11 months ago
whythere is fucking need of quad sli or tri
thesdcfa 11 months ago
@ThePrinceRohan It's called getting a job and saving up.
Xuvial 11 months ago
LOL? Sometimes the quad sli gets lest fps than the tri sli? WTF? LOLOLOL
Beardactal 11 months ago
unnoticeable changes really..
rodel5552002 11 months ago
@rodel5552002 yeah, I couldn't see a big difference. I thought it would have been higher. I've seen MSI GTX 560 Ti's in SLI that ran Crysis better lol.
I read that some people are saying he's using Xeon's which are server CPU's. I wonder if the CPU can work properly in game? I dunno. disapointing video anyways.
DoomTra1n 11 months ago
@DoomTra1n ** shit, reads text on screen. OK maxi, I gotcha. lol
DoomTra1n 11 months ago
the reason the frames are so slow in some spots is because CryEngine 2 is not optimized and not upgraded to today cards and CryEngine 2 is so pretty much expect 100+ Frames with Quad SLI and TRI SLI because in his Heaven 2.1 he had more than 100 fps as max
TheModernwarfare2009 11 months ago
@t4kerz You can only run 2x GTX 590's in SLI. That will give you quad SLI.
PHWeeMan 11 months ago
if I spend 10,000 bucks on a PC I'd pretty much expect more fps then 35 at some points 0.0
halflifefan84 11 months ago
I hear so many people complaining about COST + FPS but is'nt the objective smoother gameplay !!! !!!
FeLLoNeY 11 months ago
Useless.
DaroffApFire 11 months ago
omfg 2000 euros in cards just to get 35-70 fps, insane oO
cobrastomas 11 months ago
instead of buying your first car, just buy this :P
SHAD0WING 11 months ago
You should get more than that a single 6990 gets 45-80 fps
mikee1333 11 months ago
@Anthraxsgaming Yeah, you just went off topic to show off you 2600k.
This is, or at least was, about Crysis.
SickneZZ2 11 months ago
@Anthraxsgaming 920 D0 revision.
SickneZZ2 11 months ago
You Ran IT in DX11 wtf .-__-
mikee1333 11 months ago
@mikee1333 you can't run crysis in DX11 because it doesn't support it ;)
lorin1996 11 months ago
dear santa...
airhornwaggon 1 year ago
Lol, 2,000$ USD just for the graphics cards...
UnknownXV 1 year ago
i dont think people understand that he is actually running a really high resolution thats why his frame rates a lower than normal.
kkjiikk 1 year ago
Funny, this game released in 07 and 4 years later, we are still using it as one of the most extreme games yet... im VERY sure that people will still use it in the next 2 years.. lol
neonzion7 1 year ago
I remember playing Mario at 256 x 224 which was in sprites or 2D rendering. How far have we come in two decades or so, and how far will we go? Wow I can only imagine.
dannielpreto 1 year ago
i think a lot of people are missing the point that he's running 3 30inch monitors eye finity that is why it's "low fps"
kekelah 1 year ago
@kekelah Nvidia Surround, actually
xG33Kx 1 year ago
@kekelah Eyefinity? lol that would be AMD not Nvidia
Ace33blue 1 year ago
low,very low, 4x best card, but only 40-50 frames!
oliundmarlo 1 year ago
@oliundmarlo
He is running the game on three 30inch monitors with resolutions at 2560X1600, WQXGA (Wide Quad eXtended Graphics Array) that have four times as many pixels as a regular WXGA (1280×800) display. With increased resolution managing frame rates at average of 40+ FPS is incredibly awesome.
If this was a simple 1080p monitor then except FPS of over 80, easily done.
MrGrandDragon 1 year ago
Inb4 hate comments.
But Crysis is HORRIBLE. The game is pure Graphics. That's about it.
I ain't even saying that because i can't run it or shit, i actually got a i7 @4.0Ghz and a 5970. But it's not even fun to play.
SickneZZ2 1 year ago
@SickneZZ2 Agreed, Crysis is no fun at all, sure the graphic is top notch, but thats all, there is hell of alot games better than Crysis that I do enjoy ..
houari2009 1 year ago
@houari2009 Tup, same here.
SickneZZ2 1 year ago
@houari2009 I meant Yup, but you got it, lol.
SickneZZ2 1 year ago
i imagine this will not be outdated for like 10 years (the machine)
Dragon313035 1 year ago
we need a processor with 1 terahertz and a 800 ghz graphics chip thats what we need
chunkmanshaun 1 year ago
SR-2 with 3&4 gtx 580 an the fps are still dropping to 30-40 lol what a wast of money
jacekantoine 1 year ago
don't ATI GFX cards have eyefinity so you don't have to buy several cards for multiple monitors?? this is way too overkill but nice video though ^_^
tringuyen552911 1 year ago
this makes me wonder what would happen if on crysis 3 they made the graphics even better than crysis and the consoles all got a hardware update to play it.
Dragon313035 1 year ago
Though there would be some difference with a 4th card costing u $900 nearly..
knownuser09 1 year ago
why did you cheap out on the ram ?
slfviirus 1 year ago
@slfviirus 12 gb ram at 2000 mhz is not "cheaping out"
its 400 dollars dude
worldofurin 1 year ago
@worldofurin Oh, lol i thought it was 1333mhz
slfviirus 1 year ago