@franciswh you a bitch , youre a motherfucker , beckham is not a pussy , youre daddy is a pussy , and fuck you , you stupid donckey , MAMA LA PINGA PUTA
the thing about american football that is so incredible to think about is that if you separate a generation's athletic talent into tiers of quality, in the USA, the first, second and third tier of talent goes to football and basketball by HUGE margins. so basically, the NFL is a competitive league of Olympic levels of athletic genetics and talent. this is why our soccer teams are less competitive internationally. and we relatively struggle in things like Olympic weightlifting
@000EatMan000 spoken like somone who never watches soccer and the world cup heres two little facts u may not know by the soccer is the most popular sport in the world and if u put evey person in the world who plays american football and baseball in the world there are more soccer players
@steamingmidget world cup soccer is my favorite athletic event and i played soccer my whole youth until an injury ended my competitive participation. what did i say that was so incorrect? and this time don't sound like a douchebag when you respond
@000EatMan000 its probably ur favorite because just like every other non soccer fan in america u only like it because everyone else acts like they do and because its ur country when really u know nothing about it was that nice enough for u
This is Football propaganda! I don't know a man on the face of the earth who could get hurt by being pulled down in full pads. He wasn't even tackled, just pulled to the floor! This is not the pussy that most soccer players are.
Rugby doesn't compare. Pads make you hit HARDER. Just got off death bed (literally) from a hit. I pass blocking; DE crashing hard and we unloaded. Clean hit/some head to head. No bell rung; 2 days later felt like shit, went hospital. Brain lesion. Gave 10% chance to live on arrival. 1 month hospital/bed, 2 month relaxing, and I fine now but can never play. That was a purposeful, normal, clean hit. Rugby can never hit that hard on purpose. Best Sport in the world and I have no regrets.
In 1894, the sport of football came under attack by Harvard president Charles Eliot. In a diatribe entitled "The Evils of Football," he declared that "the American game of football, as now played, is unfit for colleges and schools … As a spectacle football is more brutalizing than prize fighting, cock fighting, or bull fighting."
Wish it had been a more physically robust footballer as opposed to Beckham. He was never really the strongest or quickest. Bet Samba, Sagna or Cahill at least wouldn't have looked ridiculous in pads.
@hiranwa Footballers are buil to be strong, but with lean muscle mass, like Beckham. Bush is very muscular and strong but he has more mass because clearly his sport calls for it. That's why Beckham easily got knocked down.
@burton2156 are you for real ? take another look at rugby players and there fitness levels there monters and even more so is super league rugby! take a look
@paulgregs2006 If American football players didn't wear pads the chances of becoming paralyzed or even dying would increase tenfold. A kick-off basically consists of two teams running at each other full speed and colliding. Players get banged up pretty bad even with pads on.
@Tree0rnament That's correct. If you know sports history, American Football was nearly made illegal by President Roosevelt, because it was too violent. Bloodbath at Hampden Park is a good example where I believe three to five players were permanently crippled (Broken neck, legs snapped in half, etc).
/watch?v=ZEccmg4JRbE Both players' career were ended on this one hit. One was paralyzed beneath his waist, though he did regain the ability to walk later.
Football such as Reggie Bush plays = American Football
Football such as David Beckham plays = Associated Football (in Spain Futball)
you just need to use common sense when dealing with the term football, obvious if someone says the score of the football game was 3-1 Bush was not playing, or if someone says a touchdown was scored best believe beckham didnt score it...lol
then there is rugby and the games like that (rugby, Aussie Football) which i am not as familiar with
reggie bush is a bitch. Beckham is the man, world-wide. Bush can only dream of making that amount of money, in his career, that Beckham makes in one season.
@steenglish football has faster impacts than rugby, the speed and force at which a player meets another is much higher in the NFL. I don't take away anything from rugby, those players are tough sons a bitches, tougher than most football players, they just don't hit at those higher speeds (20 mph +), if football didn't have pads, half the players would be brain dead or crippled by now, or the rules would be dramatically different
damn david beckham looks so little, imagine what reggie would do on a full pad practice, david should stick to soccer where he was great and reggie needs to get his shit together for next season he has not livedup to the expectation...
THE CHINESE DID NOT INVENT FOOTBALL! HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF YOU PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THIS FIFA SPUN RUBBISH. JUST BECAUSE THEY PLAYED A GAME WHERE YOU KICKED A BALL DOES NOT MEAN IT WAS FOOTBALL. DID THE FIRST PERSON TO THROW AN EGG INVENT RUGBY, AMERICAN FOOTBALL AND AUSSIE RULES? THE FIRST GUY TO THROW A ROCK INVENT BASEBALL, CRICKET AND HANDBALL? FOOTBALL WAS INVENTED IN ENGLAND, NO MATTER HOW MUCH ANTI ENGLISH FIFA DISLIKE THE FACT!
@sij748 The only comparison between rugby and american football is that they carry the ball, and they tackle, thats it, i'm welsh, ive played rugby all my life, last year i got the chance to play american football for the shropshire revolution, my job on the field was to tackle, i was on defense, i never had ball in hand i just tackled. And despite the pads and helmet, i left the field hurting more than any rugby game. take it from someone thats played both sports. They are nothing alike.
@joeroberts263 when did i ever say rugby are alike? i said american football is a 'rip-off' of rugby, which is slightly different in my semantics. admittedly i was being dramatic and crude to make a point, but i think if you know the history of american football then you would agree with the principal behind what i said, as it originated from rugby!!
@wh0awh0awh0a don't get me wrong i love both sports but lets be honest even if it is underrated the physicality of soccer doesn't sniff the crack of American football.
@wh0awh0awh0a Nemanja Vidic is a stringbean,,,reggie bush would put vididcs ass in the dirt anyday...bush isnt even a hard hitter...you should see clay matthews or ray louis
@mmmodafoca No I don't think that this is better. Infact I like both of these sports equally. I'm just tired of the haters calling American Football a sport for pussies.
American Football has just as much a right to be called FOOTBALL as mush as Soccer does. The origins of the word FOOTBALL derive from games being played on foot as opposed to only the foot being used to propel the ball. This nomenclature was used to distinguish these games from ones played on horseback by the upper classes.
Link ~ tiny dot cc/8ux2t
Read the article. Also note its on a British website so its not as if Americans created this history.
king henry VIII played football because we found his football boots - i guess that makes him a working class citizen. the class structure argument in football that you are proposing is only associated to a niche timeframe in history, specifically the 19th century - its not as black and white as you are suggesting i.e. football = working class, rugby = middle class, horses = upper class. I still don't buy the argument you said in a previous comment: "Football...it means games played on foot" :-/
@sij748 You're a dumb fuck. Ive already posted the link that has factual evidence as to the origins of the word "FOOTBALL". You're just typing out random theories like anyone cares at all.
@sij748 needless to say i think you are a lazy cunt for not reading the article i linked to. literally every point youve raised is refuted in said article. youre just being a twat dragging out an argument to feel better about yourself. pretty pathetic really.
@raggedtraveler stop swearing as it makes you look like an idiot.& fyi i did read the article but i disagree with some of it as it sounds to cut and dry for my liking because you can find examples that contradict what it says ie monarchs have played football for hundreds if not thousands of years in one form or another - so stop presuming :p needless to say,how come not all sports have the suffix of 'football' because most are not played on horseback and were not created by the upper classes? :/
@sij748 gee, i dunno, why dont you go do some research on that if its really got your panties in a twist, then come back on youtube with your findings. the point still stands that AMERICAN FOOTBALL has just as much a right to be called FOOTBALL as any other code (Association, Rugby, Aussie Rules, Gaelic, etc.) due to the origins of the word
if you so heatedly disagree with the findings in the article then write a strongly worded letter to the author and perhaps he'll change it. but i doubt it.
@raggedtraveler gee, i dunno, maybe when you stop being a sarcastic, patronising bitch ... but i still think american football should have the word rugby thrown in its name somewhere as it is a more appropriate name for it, which is what i basically said in my initial comment that you responded to
@sij748 i posted some hard facts about the history and origin of the word FOOTBALL and provided a link whilst youre just regurgitating the same old argument because "it sounds to cut and dry for my liking". you're the sarcastic bitch, MATE.
@raggedtraveler fyi,if you noticed what i actually wrote in my last few posts i wasnt disagreeing with the main substance of what you were proposing,but rather i opposed an element of your line of contention on the premise that there is evidence that the upper classes have played football throughout history and consequently saying that the word 'football' distinguishing sports played between social class and suggesting it as an absolute fact is misguided-there is a slight difference
@sij748 you never posted said evidence, however, only referenced it. my proposition carries more weight as ive linked an article detailing the history of the word football. and i never stated that the social class barrier existed throughout the entire history of Britain, only that this was the environment in which the word football was created. thats totally besides the point though. the point being that American Football is just another "code" of football thus not requiring absolute use of the
@raggedtraveler i didn't realise we were still having a debate this, but nevertheless i still think a more appropriate name for american football should include rugby in it - which is basically what i think my initial comment said that you replied to
@sij748 since rugby came from soccer should rugby football also have soccer in its title? Aussie rules football came from rugby - should rugby be in the name of that sport? the differences in nomenclature defines the sport. but they're all 'codes' of football.
@raggedtraveler the word 'association' in the term association football came into existence after rugby football was created.This is because association football adhered to the rules outlined by the (English)Football Association,while Ruby football adhere to the rules initiated by Rugby School.but as both rugby and 'soccer' initially identify themselves as football they distinguished themselves by identifying each code from where the rules originated from ie rugby and the (football)association..
@sij748 rugby still came from soccer. the history is that William Webb Ellis broke the rules by picking up the ball and running with it creating a game that would later become rugby. by your logic every code of football should have the name of its predecessor in its title which is just stupid and wrong. soccer and rugby fans often refer to their code as just "football", just as NFL fans call their code football.
@raggedtraveler when did i ever say rugby didn't come from association football? all i talked about in the previous comment is the origin and prefix of the words 'association' and 'rugby' in relation to word 'football'. needless to say, in britain, like in the US, we predominantly use the term 'rugby' to identify rugby football because association football is the predominant and original game of footy :). and no, i dont thinkevery code of football should have the name of its predecessor ...
@raggedtraveler and fyi aussie rules actually was codified before 'soccer' and rugby, in 1859 from my understanding, while association football was officially codified in 1862 by the Football Association and Rugby in 1871 by the Rugby Football Union .. so technically aussie rules is the forefather of rugby, however many people don't accept aussie rules as the initial & principal football as many brits and irish took football in it various forms (ruby, association, gaelic) over to aus with them
@sij748 And that niche timeframe in history is where the word "Football" was formed. You don't have to buy my argument because Ive already posted a link while youre just spitting random bullshit.
@raggedtraveler your mis understanding me, i'm saying your line of contention in my opinion is invalid because if you use your logic "Football...it means games played on foot" then every game played with a ball would be use the word 'football' in its name i.e basketball, netball, cricket, baseball golf, tennis just to name but a few.
@raggedtraveler moreover, saying that the origin of the football is to to distinguish the lower social class from the upper class is not as clear cut as you think it is because you can find evidence that monarchs have historically played football in its many codes and that the lower and middle classes use horse as a means of sporting entertainment
"The name it acquired refers not to the fact that only the feet could be used to propel the ball, but that the game was played on foot. This marked it out as a game played by ordinary people, as distinct from the team games of the nobility which were played on horseback."
@raggedtraveler The explanation is vague to say the least, to constitute why football is called football. You need a game, a football code that doesn't involve kicking, more notably scoring points or goals without the use of the foot, to verify the on foot theory. Further more, In the beginning of gridiron and rugby, the primary way to score points was kicking the ball up between two uprights, the touchdown didn't exist....The name football is because of the kicking, numbnuts.
@Geraldo1101 lol look at you working yourself into a storm. the explanation is pretty clear "The name it acquired refers not to the fact that only the feet could be used to propel the ball, but that the game was played on foot." What part of that is so hard to understand, you dumb fuck?
your logic doesn't make senses :s .. "Football .... it means games played on foot" .. i thought most games are played on foot, so why isn't every other game refered to with the prefix of 'foot' then?! :-/ .. in addition,your social class argument is also obsured, as Rugby football is regarded as an upper class sport here in britain you idiot
@sij747 upper 'middle' class. rugby wasn't always an elitist sport until it broke with rugby league in the late 1800s, thats when it really broke from its origins and became the sport of the establishment. also there are a bunch of footy 'codes'. learn some history dumbfuck.
@raggedtraveler Prince William plays rugby. Considering he a member of the british monarchy does this fact reduce his social status to upper 'middle' class because he doesn't always ride a horse; moreover jockeys ride horses so does this elevate their social status to upper class? your whole upper class vs everyone else social status argument about people who do and don't play football and linking this to horse riding is utter drivel in this modern day and age.
@sij748 Read the link I posted, retard. The class structure may not exist as strongly today as it once did, but that was the environment in which the word "football" was created. Stop making an argument out of nothing.
@raggedtraveler moreover, the mongolians rode horses and regularly held archery competitions using them. does that classify every mongolian who ever rode a horse at the same time as being in an archery competition as upper class - i don't think so. Thus suggesting your social status argument is not quite as valid as you think it is.
That wasn't even really a tackle......just more of a simple take down. Beck didn't even hit the ground all that hard, and he's wearing pads. I'm no football/soccer hater, but seriously......he HAS to be tougher than that. Reggie's tiny by AF standards.
@razorfett147 Notice how and when Beckham gets taken down, then notice the following sequence seen from a different angle where he rolls. The roll seems a bit excessive don't you think? It's all for the show.. It's not real!!
I still fail to see why there's so much hate on the net between fans of these two sports. They're very different games, despite the nomenclature. You'd just as soon compare basketball to tennis.....it's that different. Smashing on soccer/football/futbol or American football with ignorant stereotypes is just disrespectful to the athletes that play these two games.
PEOPLE PEOPLE! calm the fuck down.. Football and American TackleBall is nothing to get upset about! Come on they're both VERY ENTERTAINING and is sometimes our only way of escape from the BS of the world. No NEED TO START ARGUING over what sport is better they provide an essential piece to our Societies.
@des696969 get ur head out of ur ass.. the sport that was invented first has naming rights. Besides how am i offending any sport??? you do tackle in American tackleball DON't YOU??? It would be offensive if you were to call it something that it is not.. LIKE FOOTBALL! geez have a good one!
@des696969 *double facepalm* are you used to failing at such a horrible level? i'm pretty sure u are otherwise you wouldn't have replied with the most imbecilic come back i have ever heard on youtube. Didn't you know theres already a game/sport called Kickball?? that was the best come back you could think of to try to belittle the real football?? Congrats to you pal, you are fucking pathetic.
@mmmodafoca didn't you realize theres already a sport called football? Let's keep it real and stick to football/soccer. "Failing at such a horrible level" You call soccer football nuff said.
@des696969 It's obvious that you're having trouble with the English language, which by the way has an interesting point there.. Why don't you call the English language United-statish? Why is this so?? because they invented the languagee they had NAMING RIGHTS you fucktard! Now as i said before get your head out of your ass, and learn to call a spade a spade. DEAL WITH IT.
@mmmodafoca news flash.. I didn't name it the English Language.. and I do occasionally call a spade a spade.. but it doesn't really matter because what it's called is what it's called.. Football is Football and Soccer is Soccer learn to deal with it.. we don't want to be associated with a boring sport anyways.
@des696969 Bwahahahaha i can see that your at your wits end. Can't think of anything else to say about the original argument, so you go ahead and call it boring. I forget who was the first to feel offended when i merely called a spade a spade by referring to American Football as Tackleball? tsk tsk tsk. Tell you what when you finally grow up and realize that your country isn't number one at all come chat with the rest of us. Have a good one champ.
@mmmodafoca Honestly, I reply to so many youtube comments that I really don't have time to go back and check on what I said. Football is Football and Soccer is Soccer.. bottom line.. you on the other hand have some serious anger management issues if you're getting this worked up after I told you to call it for what it is which is Soccer and Football.. It's not like you're good at either sport so what does it matter to you
What i wanna see is American "Football" meets Rugby...would be an interesting outcome.
Or, take this same example and reverse it and have an american footballer vs a football defender like Gattuso, or even De Jong. Show u what a real mans game is...
@SdotLondonSayNoMore having played both (and rugbys fun don't get me wrong) i would say "football" or handball if you will is more brutal, but i dont see what brutality has to do with gameplay, its all personal preference, and it would not be fair to put "gattusso" or " de jong" against an american football player, he would get killed,their bodies are built completely differently, (an american footballers and a footballers) they are entirely different games wich require different skills for each
@cplexroro i think the breakdown or ruck area is more dangerous than any standing hit in american football. your body is basically lying there motionless to be cleaned out or rucked. guys weighing 280+ pounds slamming into you without pads.
@cplexroro i have no problems with the game or physicality of american football, but what i do have a problem with is its name. 'football' wtf? .. its a rip off of rugby and players hardly uses their feet to kick the ball; moreover, the ball is not even a foot long (an official nfl ball is 11.25 inches). i think american rugby is the most appropriate name for it..
@sij747 Football doesn't necessarily mean using your feet, it means games played on foot by middle and working class as opposed to on horseback like the upper class. The wording originated in Europe but has many other applications. American Football is just another "code" of football. There's rugby football, association football, Aussie rules football. American football has just as much a right to call itself football as any other code.
@raggedtraveler funnily enough, all football codes involves some sort of kicking. The on foot theory is just a myth conveniently used to justify why American football is called "football". There is no evidence in history to support the on foot theory. And out of all the current football codes American football has the least amount of kicking in it....
@Geraldo1101 how is it an American myth if it was created in Britain? "There is no evidence in history to support the on foot theory." lol wow, did you do some research on that or do you enjoy looking like a retard?
@sij747 American football and rugby are almost two completely different sports its ridiculous for them to be called the same. They share similarities but so do soccer and rugby and about a million other codes of football.
@raggedtraveler and i never said they should be called the same. otherwise they would be both called either rugby football or american football :s all i suggested is that the word 'rugby' should be put into the name of american football and be called something along the line of american rugby football.
@sij748 yeah nah still doesnt work. rugby and American football are as different as different can be. the only similarities are one originating from another and others, but such similarities are shared with about a handful of other codes of footy. calling it American rugby football sounds like a good idea at first but with a bit of research you'll find that the current nomenclature makes infinitely more sense. youve admitted to being crude to make that point. it was ill-informed and wrong though
@raggedtraveler likewise Association Football and American Football are, as you put it,'as different as different can be' and even more so than Rugby Football and American Football.Your argument seemingly contradicts itself as you suggest that 2 apparently different sports(Association Football & American Football) can be named the same (i.e football)but the suggestion of naming 2 apparently similar sports (Rugby Football & American Football) in an increasingly similar fashion is more invalid :s
wow everyone needs to shut up. THEIR BOTH SPORTS. HOW THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO COMPARE THE TWO IF THEY DONT PLAY THE SAME WAY. REGGIE BUSH iS WAAAY MORE BUFFER THAT DAVID BECKAHM. DAVID BECKHAM IS WAY MORE QUICKER THAT REGGIE. HE GOT HURT BECAUSE HIS BODY ISNT BUILT FOR IT. REGGIE HAS MORE OF A BUILD.
@187Alen You can't compare two things that are so different from one another. That's like comparing fire and water. At least compare something like Hockey, which is more like Soccer than anything, except it's played on ice and with sticks. I personally like American Football better, but I love Soccer and I'm not gonna hate on it.
@fretman411 Rofl, your funny, your comparing ice and sticks to Euro Football with grass. American Football has grass too and both of them don't use sticks so idk what the fuck your talking about.
@187AlenObviously you don't know what I'm talking about, cause you're offended. I just meant that both soccer and hockey are played without hands and both use nets for goals, the positions and strategy are also similar, as well as rules. I even said, "except it's played on ice and with sticks." I didn't say they were the same, just more similar than football and soccer. Why compare two sports because they are both played on grass? Almost every sport is played on grass. Wasn't trying to be funny.
@dnbjarhead Actually, we do have yellow and red cars in America - they're used in many, many sports. Football (soccer) is a contact sport but of a different sort., since the goal is not to tackle your opponent. Going studs up on the back of someone's leg is 'reckless,' and therefore a red card. That's what red cards are usually given for - reckless behavior. There is no sport that doesn't give out penalties for reckless behavior - American football is FULL of penalties of just that sort.
@cescudify Yes they do run more because in Football, they run every play...in soccer they only run if they have the ball or are attacking but most of the time its just passing and jogging....I watch and play both sports....and yes, American Footballers run more
@PhantomXII haha. that has got to be the dumbest thing ive ever heard. the sad thing is, tennis players run more in a 5 set match than NFL players run during a game!
@ huopra
that = a tackle, dumbass.
ToothyDeer 5 days ago
That wasn't tackle.... -.- He just grabbed Beckham and pulled him to ground
huopra 1 week ago
Beckham is such a pussy
franciswh 3 weeks ago
@franciswh you a bitch , youre a motherfucker , beckham is not a pussy , youre daddy is a pussy , and fuck you , you stupid donckey , MAMA LA PINGA PUTA
thedarkpower77 2 weeks ago
Horsecollar tackle!
grandeTO9 2 months ago 2
It's a dive ref give Becks a yellow!!!
mawriz 2 months ago
Hey what happened to Pierre Thomas #23 ha ha Go Galaxy and Beckham, Donavan, Keane win the MLS cup
pielover13598 2 months ago
4 fuck sake, every video i see people arguing about the two sports. just get along with eachother you dicks
jamesgd7 3 months ago
the thing about american football that is so incredible to think about is that if you separate a generation's athletic talent into tiers of quality, in the USA, the first, second and third tier of talent goes to football and basketball by HUGE margins. so basically, the NFL is a competitive league of Olympic levels of athletic genetics and talent. this is why our soccer teams are less competitive internationally. and we relatively struggle in things like Olympic weightlifting
000EatMan000 4 months ago
@000EatMan000 spoken like somone who never watches soccer and the world cup heres two little facts u may not know by the soccer is the most popular sport in the world and if u put evey person in the world who plays american football and baseball in the world there are more soccer players
steamingmidget 1 month ago
@steamingmidget world cup soccer is my favorite athletic event and i played soccer my whole youth until an injury ended my competitive participation. what did i say that was so incorrect? and this time don't sound like a douchebag when you respond
000EatMan000 1 month ago
@000EatMan000 its probably ur favorite because just like every other non soccer fan in america u only like it because everyone else acts like they do and because its ur country when really u know nothing about it was that nice enough for u
steamingmidget 3 weeks ago
@steamingmidget what you said makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. but it was a much nicer tone, which i appreciate.
000EatMan000 3 weeks ago
If i was David, i would've went all Braveheart on himmm. :/
bloodywoah77 4 months ago
@bloodywoah77
He's English...
paletti727 3 months ago
This is Football propaganda! I don't know a man on the face of the earth who could get hurt by being pulled down in full pads. He wasn't even tackled, just pulled to the floor! This is not the pussy that most soccer players are.
JoshuaJamesWilhite 5 months ago
ok that was not legit. could we have a real tackle by someone who gets paid to tackle? like a safety or DB, LB if you want to paralyze Beckham
MIXEDUPTHROWNTOGETHR 5 months ago
FAKE!!!!!!!!!! CHIN STRAPS CHANGE FROM BEGINNING TO END OF VIDEO!!! FFFAAAAAAKEEEEEEEE
Stejark 5 months ago
@Stejark Your mother's chemotherapy wig has a chin strap
cuntylishus 4 months ago
this is fake there chin straps changed in the begining
123Bibish 5 months ago
Rugby doesn't compare. Pads make you hit HARDER. Just got off death bed (literally) from a hit. I pass blocking; DE crashing hard and we unloaded. Clean hit/some head to head. No bell rung; 2 days later felt like shit, went hospital. Brain lesion. Gave 10% chance to live on arrival. 1 month hospital/bed, 2 month relaxing, and I fine now but can never play. That was a purposeful, normal, clean hit. Rugby can never hit that hard on purpose. Best Sport in the world and I have no regrets.
840096 5 months ago
@840096 and not a single fuck was given that day.
Irmasterlol 5 months ago
@840096 Which is why no one outside the US and Canada gives a crap...right?
Headcheezonium 4 months ago
@840096 Which is why no one outside the US and Canada gives a crap...right?
Headcheezonium 4 months ago
Just an example:
In 1894, the sport of football came under attack by Harvard president Charles Eliot. In a diatribe entitled "The Evils of Football," he declared that "the American game of football, as now played, is unfit for colleges and schools … As a spectacle football is more brutalizing than prize fighting, cock fighting, or bull fighting."
shiron236 5 months ago
I'd like to tackle David Beckham myself... ;)
ccipollini1984 5 months ago
@ccipollini1984 eww gross xD
SteveTwoTheO 5 months ago
its man sport. Before we have this armour ther was min 20 deaths in season!!
PatrykKonicki 6 months ago
Wish it had been a more physically robust footballer as opposed to Beckham. He was never really the strongest or quickest. Bet Samba, Sagna or Cahill at least wouldn't have looked ridiculous in pads.
hiranwa 6 months ago
@hiranwa Footballers are buil to be strong, but with lean muscle mass, like Beckham. Bush is very muscular and strong but he has more mass because clearly his sport calls for it. That's why Beckham easily got knocked down.
deLasChivas 6 months ago
he said its a mans game take off the fucking pads then
paulgregs2006 6 months ago
@paulgregs2006 YOU MIGHT BE THE TOUGHEST MAN IN THE WORLD..
burton2156 6 months ago
@burton2156 RUGBY
paulgregs2006 6 months ago
@paulgregs2006 Proffessional rugby players don't compare to NFL players physically, thats why they need the pads
burton2156 6 months ago
@burton2156 are you for real ? take another look at rugby players and there fitness levels there monters and even more so is super league rugby! take a look
paulgregs2006 6 months ago
@paulgregs2006 If American football players didn't wear pads the chances of becoming paralyzed or even dying would increase tenfold. A kick-off basically consists of two teams running at each other full speed and colliding. Players get banged up pretty bad even with pads on.
/watch?v=7mwdWtbp4Bk&feature=related
Tree0rnament 6 months ago
@Tree0rnament That's correct. If you know sports history, American Football was nearly made illegal by President Roosevelt, because it was too violent. Bloodbath at Hampden Park is a good example where I believe three to five players were permanently crippled (Broken neck, legs snapped in half, etc).
/watch?v=ZEccmg4JRbE Both players' career were ended on this one hit. One was paralyzed beneath his waist, though he did regain the ability to walk later.
shiron236 5 months ago
Football such as Reggie Bush plays = American Football
Football such as David Beckham plays = Associated Football (in Spain Futball)
you just need to use common sense when dealing with the term football, obvious if someone says the score of the football game was 3-1 Bush was not playing, or if someone says a touchdown was scored best believe beckham didnt score it...lol
then there is rugby and the games like that (rugby, Aussie Football) which i am not as familiar with
90brian90 6 months ago
LOL David got hurt from that pussy tackle?! Ive seen bigger hits in peewee football and the kids get up right after the hit.
frozenfire550 7 months ago
funny lol.. his heads to small for the helmet. what a goal for david beckham and heeesss gonna hit an empty net!
Mintbeans123 7 months ago
bestie friendies
FOOTBALLcomz1st 8 months ago
That tackle was all horse-collar. XD
flyguyking 8 months ago
not really a tackle. i call that a little pulling. and he still got hurt. oh well
wilsonthao 8 months ago
@wilsonthao This was a set up, dumbass. Notice how they changed the angle from when he was taken down to when he made the roll.
Hammerhook12 8 months ago
Why Cant All Videos Be Like This ? Smhhh
dictioary 8 months ago
@dictioary Shake my head head head?
Looorney 8 months ago
reggie bush is a bitch. Beckham is the man, world-wide. Bush can only dream of making that amount of money, in his career, that Beckham makes in one season.
funguy7979 8 months ago
lol he runs so awkwardly in the padding, cause hes not used to it but its still funny
BrownMan59 8 months ago
Beckhams real talent is he changed his chin strap mid route and no one even noticed :P
MichaelJamesLex 8 months ago
Rugby's a "man's game" not this rubbish! Look at all the gear they put on then look what rugby players wear!
steenglish 8 months ago
@steenglish football has faster impacts than rugby, the speed and force at which a player meets another is much higher in the NFL. I don't take away anything from rugby, those players are tough sons a bitches, tougher than most football players, they just don't hit at those higher speeds (20 mph +), if football didn't have pads, half the players would be brain dead or crippled by now, or the rules would be dramatically different
NevadaWrangler 7 months ago
damn david beckham looks so little, imagine what reggie would do on a full pad practice, david should stick to soccer where he was great and reggie needs to get his shit together for next season he has not livedup to the expectation...
MrLuiS3rd 8 months ago
Kinda disturbing that the names of ballgames is the most sensitive subject in this world...
lashlashlashlashlash 9 months ago
lol is Beckham wearing Pierre Thomas' jersey?
ThisIsZackary 9 months ago
hey he caught the ball, complete pass!
maximus14433 10 months ago
becks looks so scrawny in the padding haha.. defnitely too big for him
jesuistahmid 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE CHINESE DID NOT INVENT FOOTBALL! HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF YOU PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THIS FIFA SPUN RUBBISH. JUST BECAUSE THEY PLAYED A GAME WHERE YOU KICKED A BALL DOES NOT MEAN IT WAS FOOTBALL. DID THE FIRST PERSON TO THROW AN EGG INVENT RUGBY, AMERICAN FOOTBALL AND AUSSIE RULES? THE FIRST GUY TO THROW A ROCK INVENT BASEBALL, CRICKET AND HANDBALL? FOOTBALL WAS INVENTED IN ENGLAND, NO MATTER HOW MUCH ANTI ENGLISH FIFA DISLIKE THE FACT!
sij748 10 months ago
@sij748 The only comparison between rugby and american football is that they carry the ball, and they tackle, thats it, i'm welsh, ive played rugby all my life, last year i got the chance to play american football for the shropshire revolution, my job on the field was to tackle, i was on defense, i never had ball in hand i just tackled. And despite the pads and helmet, i left the field hurting more than any rugby game. take it from someone thats played both sports. They are nothing alike.
joeroberts263 10 months ago
@joeroberts263 when did i ever say rugby are alike? i said american football is a 'rip-off' of rugby, which is slightly different in my semantics. admittedly i was being dramatic and crude to make a point, but i think if you know the history of american football then you would agree with the principal behind what i said, as it originated from rugby!!
sij748 10 months ago
Comment removed
renoman222 10 months ago
yay! we have the softest running back in the league representing the physicality of football.. ADDIDAS you guys are geniuses
renoman222 10 months ago
@renoman222 And we have the softest footballer going on it representing the extremely underrated physicality of real football! (:
Let's see Nemanja Vidic against Reggie Bush... Vidic would probably just kill him XD.
wh0awh0awh0a 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wh0awh0awh0a don't get me wrong i love both sports but lets be honest even if it is underrated the physicality of soccer doesn't sniff the crack of American football.
renoman222 10 months ago
@wh0awh0awh0a Nemanja Vidic is a stringbean,,,reggie bush would put vididcs ass in the dirt anyday...bush isnt even a hard hitter...you should see clay matthews or ray louis
NoFlowButStillaBro 1 month ago
you all forgot that beckham is a football player so he was bound to get injured XD
09YAGYEMEISTERXx 11 months ago
@mmmodafoca No I don't think that this is better. Infact I like both of these sports equally. I'm just tired of the haters calling American Football a sport for pussies.
EvanM4120 11 months ago
American Football has just as much a right to be called FOOTBALL as mush as Soccer does. The origins of the word FOOTBALL derive from games being played on foot as opposed to only the foot being used to propel the ball. This nomenclature was used to distinguish these games from ones played on horseback by the upper classes.
Link ~ tiny dot cc/8ux2t
Read the article. Also note its on a British website so its not as if Americans created this history.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
king henry VIII played football because we found his football boots - i guess that makes him a working class citizen. the class structure argument in football that you are proposing is only associated to a niche timeframe in history, specifically the 19th century - its not as black and white as you are suggesting i.e. football = working class, rugby = middle class, horses = upper class. I still don't buy the argument you said in a previous comment: "Football...it means games played on foot" :-/
sij748 11 months ago
@sij748 You're a dumb fuck. Ive already posted the link that has factual evidence as to the origins of the word "FOOTBALL". You're just typing out random theories like anyone cares at all.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler needless to say i think you are an idiot for swearing, because it makes you look like an idiotic cunt with no manners
sij748 11 months ago
@sij748 needless to say i think you are a lazy cunt for not reading the article i linked to. literally every point youve raised is refuted in said article. youre just being a twat dragging out an argument to feel better about yourself. pretty pathetic really.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler stop swearing as it makes you look like an idiot.& fyi i did read the article but i disagree with some of it as it sounds to cut and dry for my liking because you can find examples that contradict what it says ie monarchs have played football for hundreds if not thousands of years in one form or another - so stop presuming :p needless to say,how come not all sports have the suffix of 'football' because most are not played on horseback and were not created by the upper classes? :/
sij748 11 months ago
@sij748 gee, i dunno, why dont you go do some research on that if its really got your panties in a twist, then come back on youtube with your findings. the point still stands that AMERICAN FOOTBALL has just as much a right to be called FOOTBALL as any other code (Association, Rugby, Aussie Rules, Gaelic, etc.) due to the origins of the word
if you so heatedly disagree with the findings in the article then write a strongly worded letter to the author and perhaps he'll change it. but i doubt it.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler gee, i dunno, maybe when you stop being a sarcastic, patronising bitch ... but i still think american football should have the word rugby thrown in its name somewhere as it is a more appropriate name for it, which is what i basically said in my initial comment that you responded to
sij748 11 months ago
Comment removed
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@sij748 i posted some hard facts about the history and origin of the word FOOTBALL and provided a link whilst youre just regurgitating the same old argument because "it sounds to cut and dry for my liking". you're the sarcastic bitch, MATE.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler fyi,if you noticed what i actually wrote in my last few posts i wasnt disagreeing with the main substance of what you were proposing,but rather i opposed an element of your line of contention on the premise that there is evidence that the upper classes have played football throughout history and consequently saying that the word 'football' distinguishing sports played between social class and suggesting it as an absolute fact is misguided-there is a slight difference
sij748 11 months ago
@sij748 you never posted said evidence, however, only referenced it. my proposition carries more weight as ive linked an article detailing the history of the word football. and i never stated that the social class barrier existed throughout the entire history of Britain, only that this was the environment in which the word football was created. thats totally besides the point though. the point being that American Football is just another "code" of football thus not requiring absolute use of the
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler foot to propel the ball forward. because it has less kicking in it doesn't matter either, due to the origins of the word. end of.
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler i didn't realise we were still having a debate this, but nevertheless i still think a more appropriate name for american football should include rugby in it - which is basically what i think my initial comment said that you replied to
sij748 10 months ago
@sij748 since rugby came from soccer should rugby football also have soccer in its title? Aussie rules football came from rugby - should rugby be in the name of that sport? the differences in nomenclature defines the sport. but they're all 'codes' of football.
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler the word 'association' in the term association football came into existence after rugby football was created.This is because association football adhered to the rules outlined by the (English)Football Association,while Ruby football adhere to the rules initiated by Rugby School.but as both rugby and 'soccer' initially identify themselves as football they distinguished themselves by identifying each code from where the rules originated from ie rugby and the (football)association..
sij748 10 months ago
@sij748 rugby still came from soccer. the history is that William Webb Ellis broke the rules by picking up the ball and running with it creating a game that would later become rugby. by your logic every code of football should have the name of its predecessor in its title which is just stupid and wrong. soccer and rugby fans often refer to their code as just "football", just as NFL fans call their code football.
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler when did i ever say rugby didn't come from association football? all i talked about in the previous comment is the origin and prefix of the words 'association' and 'rugby' in relation to word 'football'. needless to say, in britain, like in the US, we predominantly use the term 'rugby' to identify rugby football because association football is the predominant and original game of footy :). and no, i dont thinkevery code of football should have the name of its predecessor ...
sij748 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler and fyi aussie rules actually was codified before 'soccer' and rugby, in 1859 from my understanding, while association football was officially codified in 1862 by the Football Association and Rugby in 1871 by the Rugby Football Union .. so technically aussie rules is the forefather of rugby, however many people don't accept aussie rules as the initial & principal football as many brits and irish took football in it various forms (ruby, association, gaelic) over to aus with them
sij748 10 months ago
@sij748 And that niche timeframe in history is where the word "Football" was formed. You don't have to buy my argument because Ive already posted a link while youre just spitting random bullshit.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler your mis understanding me, i'm saying your line of contention in my opinion is invalid because if you use your logic "Football...it means games played on foot" then every game played with a ball would be use the word 'football' in its name i.e basketball, netball, cricket, baseball golf, tennis just to name but a few.
sij748 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler moreover, saying that the origin of the football is to to distinguish the lower social class from the upper class is not as clear cut as you think it is because you can find evidence that monarchs have historically played football in its many codes and that the lower and middle classes use horse as a means of sporting entertainment
sij748 11 months ago
"The name it acquired refers not to the fact that only the feet could be used to propel the ball, but that the game was played on foot. This marked it out as a game played by ordinary people, as distinct from the team games of the nobility which were played on horseback."
icons dot org dot uk/theicons/collection/fa-cup/biography/history-of-football
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler The explanation is vague to say the least, to constitute why football is called football. You need a game, a football code that doesn't involve kicking, more notably scoring points or goals without the use of the foot, to verify the on foot theory. Further more, In the beginning of gridiron and rugby, the primary way to score points was kicking the ball up between two uprights, the touchdown didn't exist....The name football is because of the kicking, numbnuts.
Geraldo1101 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Geraldo1101 lol look at you working yourself into a storm. the explanation is pretty clear "The name it acquired refers not to the fact that only the feet could be used to propel the ball, but that the game was played on foot." What part of that is so hard to understand, you dumb fuck?
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
dumb kids arguing bout stupid ass shit
amfromlason 11 months ago
your logic doesn't make senses :s .. "Football .... it means games played on foot" .. i thought most games are played on foot, so why isn't every other game refered to with the prefix of 'foot' then?! :-/ .. in addition,your social class argument is also obsured, as Rugby football is regarded as an upper class sport here in britain you idiot
sij747 11 months ago
@sij747 upper 'middle' class. rugby wasn't always an elitist sport until it broke with rugby league in the late 1800s, thats when it really broke from its origins and became the sport of the establishment. also there are a bunch of footy 'codes'. learn some history dumbfuck.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler Prince William plays rugby. Considering he a member of the british monarchy does this fact reduce his social status to upper 'middle' class because he doesn't always ride a horse; moreover jockeys ride horses so does this elevate their social status to upper class? your whole upper class vs everyone else social status argument about people who do and don't play football and linking this to horse riding is utter drivel in this modern day and age.
sij748 11 months ago
@sij748 Read the link I posted, retard. The class structure may not exist as strongly today as it once did, but that was the environment in which the word "football" was created. Stop making an argument out of nothing.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler moreover, the mongolians rode horses and regularly held archery competitions using them. does that classify every mongolian who ever rode a horse at the same time as being in an archery competition as upper class - i don't think so. Thus suggesting your social status argument is not quite as valid as you think it is.
sij748 11 months ago
bottom line, if you're from america, footballs more rough
if your from Europe, rugby and "soccer" are more rough
cplexroro 11 months ago
@cplexroro I agree. Two different sports of two different sporting cultures. There are a lot of similarities though.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
Reggie Bush would die if tackled by a rugby player.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
>Divegrass
Theonlyuberpickle 11 months ago
American football wins
Failtality
2godlybeing214 1 year ago
lol. He just flicked him over.
IDontUnderstand22 1 year ago
That wasn't even really a tackle......just more of a simple take down. Beck didn't even hit the ground all that hard, and he's wearing pads. I'm no football/soccer hater, but seriously......he HAS to be tougher than that. Reggie's tiny by AF standards.
razorfett147 1 year ago
Comment removed
Geraldo1101 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@razorfett147 Notice how and when Beckham gets taken down, then notice the following sequence seen from a different angle where he rolls. The roll seems a bit excessive don't you think? It's all for the show.. It's not real!!
Geraldo1101 11 months ago
lol, pretty much everyone in europe fucking hates beckam though lol
cplexroro 1 year ago
I still fail to see why there's so much hate on the net between fans of these two sports. They're very different games, despite the nomenclature. You'd just as soon compare basketball to tennis.....it's that different. Smashing on soccer/football/futbol or American football with ignorant stereotypes is just disrespectful to the athletes that play these two games.
razorfett147 1 year ago
@razorfett147 There's conflict because of the shared name
2godlybeing214 1 year ago
@2godlybeing214 I agree. And that's what makes the argument even more juvenile.
razorfett147 1 year ago
PEOPLE PEOPLE! calm the fuck down.. Football and American TackleBall is nothing to get upset about! Come on they're both VERY ENTERTAINING and is sometimes our only way of escape from the BS of the world. No NEED TO START ARGUING over what sport is better they provide an essential piece to our Societies.
mmmodafoca 1 year ago 32
@mmmodafoca Coming from somebody who insults football by calling it tackleball.
des696969 7 months ago
@des696969 get ur head out of ur ass.. the sport that was invented first has naming rights. Besides how am i offending any sport??? you do tackle in American tackleball DON't YOU??? It would be offensive if you were to call it something that it is not.. LIKE FOOTBALL! geez have a good one!
mmmodafoca 7 months ago
@mmmodafoca Football and kickball is nothing to get upset about!
des696969 6 months ago
@des696969 *double facepalm* are you used to failing at such a horrible level? i'm pretty sure u are otherwise you wouldn't have replied with the most imbecilic come back i have ever heard on youtube. Didn't you know theres already a game/sport called Kickball?? that was the best come back you could think of to try to belittle the real football?? Congrats to you pal, you are fucking pathetic.
mmmodafoca 6 months ago
@mmmodafoca didn't you realize theres already a sport called football? Let's keep it real and stick to football/soccer. "Failing at such a horrible level" You call soccer football nuff said.
des696969 6 months ago
@des696969 It's obvious that you're having trouble with the English language, which by the way has an interesting point there.. Why don't you call the English language United-statish? Why is this so?? because they invented the languagee they had NAMING RIGHTS you fucktard! Now as i said before get your head out of your ass, and learn to call a spade a spade. DEAL WITH IT.
mmmodafoca 6 months ago
@mmmodafoca news flash.. I didn't name it the English Language.. and I do occasionally call a spade a spade.. but it doesn't really matter because what it's called is what it's called.. Football is Football and Soccer is Soccer learn to deal with it.. we don't want to be associated with a boring sport anyways.
des696969 6 months ago
@des696969 Bwahahahaha i can see that your at your wits end. Can't think of anything else to say about the original argument, so you go ahead and call it boring. I forget who was the first to feel offended when i merely called a spade a spade by referring to American Football as Tackleball? tsk tsk tsk. Tell you what when you finally grow up and realize that your country isn't number one at all come chat with the rest of us. Have a good one champ.
mmmodafoca 6 months ago
@mmmodafoca Honestly, I reply to so many youtube comments that I really don't have time to go back and check on what I said. Football is Football and Soccer is Soccer.. bottom line.. you on the other hand have some serious anger management issues if you're getting this worked up after I told you to call it for what it is which is Soccer and Football.. It's not like you're good at either sport so what does it matter to you
des696969 6 months ago
@mmmodafoca USA is #1 and always will be...USA USA USA USA USA
NoFlowButStillaBro 1 month ago
hahaha he dived, :P that's a joke for all you humourless people out there.
Raiden70666 1 year ago 20
@Raiden70666 hahahahahahha i wouldnt doubt it:P
so27109 7 months ago
What i wanna see is American "Football" meets Rugby...would be an interesting outcome.
Or, take this same example and reverse it and have an american footballer vs a football defender like Gattuso, or even De Jong. Show u what a real mans game is...
SdotLondonSayNoMore 1 year ago
@SdotLondonSayNoMore having played both (and rugbys fun don't get me wrong) i would say "football" or handball if you will is more brutal, but i dont see what brutality has to do with gameplay, its all personal preference, and it would not be fair to put "gattusso" or " de jong" against an american football player, he would get killed,their bodies are built completely differently, (an american footballers and a footballers) they are entirely different games wich require different skills for each
cplexroro 1 year ago
@cplexroro i think the breakdown or ruck area is more dangerous than any standing hit in american football. your body is basically lying there motionless to be cleaned out or rucked. guys weighing 280+ pounds slamming into you without pads.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler find me one rugby hit that is anywear near equivelent to one of these:
/watch?v=2zWRYGOLm74&mode=related&search=
/watch?v=VdQUiZ6ioKw&feature=related
/watch?v=Dme_g8t6kX0&feature=related
/watch?v=6pLQ23MQQ2g&feature=related
/watch?v=z-y0ciQE_Tg&feature=player_embedded
cplexroro 11 months ago
@cplexroro i have no problems with the game or physicality of american football, but what i do have a problem with is its name. 'football' wtf? .. its a rip off of rugby and players hardly uses their feet to kick the ball; moreover, the ball is not even a foot long (an official nfl ball is 11.25 inches). i think american rugby is the most appropriate name for it..
sij747 11 months ago
@sij747 Football doesn't necessarily mean using your feet, it means games played on foot by middle and working class as opposed to on horseback like the upper class. The wording originated in Europe but has many other applications. American Football is just another "code" of football. There's rugby football, association football, Aussie rules football. American football has just as much a right to call itself football as any other code.
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@raggedtraveler funnily enough, all football codes involves some sort of kicking. The on foot theory is just a myth conveniently used to justify why American football is called "football". There is no evidence in history to support the on foot theory. And out of all the current football codes American football has the least amount of kicking in it....
just saying
Geraldo1101 11 months ago
@Geraldo1101 how is it an American myth if it was created in Britain? "There is no evidence in history to support the on foot theory." lol wow, did you do some research on that or do you enjoy looking like a retard?
raggedtraveler 11 months ago
@sij747 American football and rugby are almost two completely different sports its ridiculous for them to be called the same. They share similarities but so do soccer and rugby and about a million other codes of football.
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler and i never said they should be called the same. otherwise they would be both called either rugby football or american football :s all i suggested is that the word 'rugby' should be put into the name of american football and be called something along the line of american rugby football.
sij748 10 months ago
@sij748 yeah nah still doesnt work. rugby and American football are as different as different can be. the only similarities are one originating from another and others, but such similarities are shared with about a handful of other codes of footy. calling it American rugby football sounds like a good idea at first but with a bit of research you'll find that the current nomenclature makes infinitely more sense. youve admitted to being crude to make that point. it was ill-informed and wrong though
raggedtraveler 10 months ago
@raggedtraveler likewise Association Football and American Football are, as you put it,'as different as different can be' and even more so than Rugby Football and American Football.Your argument seemingly contradicts itself as you suggest that 2 apparently different sports(Association Football & American Football) can be named the same (i.e football)but the suggestion of naming 2 apparently similar sports (Rugby Football & American Football) in an increasingly similar fashion is more invalid :s
sij748 10 months ago
:21 rofl now we know which one is the mans game
Sketch828 1 year ago
why did he run like a gay here when he runs so well normally....lool...the pads dont excuse him runnin like a gay
TheArabeast 1 year ago
wow everyone needs to shut up. THEIR BOTH SPORTS. HOW THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO COMPARE THE TWO IF THEY DONT PLAY THE SAME WAY. REGGIE BUSH iS WAAAY MORE BUFFER THAT DAVID BECKAHM. DAVID BECKHAM IS WAY MORE QUICKER THAT REGGIE. HE GOT HURT BECAUSE HIS BODY ISNT BUILT FOR IT. REGGIE HAS MORE OF A BUILD.
Saunga525 1 year ago
@Saunga525 First of all, check your grammar. Second Reggie Bush is one of the quickest guys in the NFL.
robbielandry 11 months ago
wow this makes david beckham look like such a wimp lol even though he's alright
Geordiful 1 year ago
Soccer isn't a sport
ZanderDisaster 1 year ago
let reggie play soccer against keane and have his fucking legs broken
damsky16 1 year ago
@damsky16 let Gattuso tackle him and have his legs broken :D
JuveTube777 1 year ago
bush= shitty overrated rb.
efker1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At 0:13 to 0:14, Reggie Bush was like, get your ass up, you a little pussy, ha ha ha
oriolesable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At 0:13 to 0:14, Reggie Bush was like, get your ass up, you a little pussy, ha ha ha
oriolesable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
At 0:13 to 0:14, Reggie Bush was like, get your ass up, you a little pussy, ha ha ha
oriolesable 1 year ago
Comment removed
oriolesable 1 year ago
it was not EVEN a formed tackle... shoulda put ray lewis out there....lol
jjbeachbums 1 year ago
Ha ha Reggie! "Come on man, your alright, It's a man's game"
spavlic 1 year ago
Haha. Even those little shots will take the wind out of you.
wccrispy 1 year ago
WTF?
how did beckam's chinstrap change after he got hit?
RBplayzRunningBack 1 year ago
You guys are seriously comparing these together? European Football Wins!
187Alen 1 year ago
@187Alen You can't compare two things that are so different from one another. That's like comparing fire and water. At least compare something like Hockey, which is more like Soccer than anything, except it's played on ice and with sticks. I personally like American Football better, but I love Soccer and I'm not gonna hate on it.
fretman411 1 year ago
@fretman411 Rofl, your funny, your comparing ice and sticks to Euro Football with grass. American Football has grass too and both of them don't use sticks so idk what the fuck your talking about.
187Alen 1 year ago
@187AlenObviously you don't know what I'm talking about, cause you're offended. I just meant that both soccer and hockey are played without hands and both use nets for goals, the positions and strategy are also similar, as well as rules. I even said, "except it's played on ice and with sticks." I didn't say they were the same, just more similar than football and soccer. Why compare two sports because they are both played on grass? Almost every sport is played on grass. Wasn't trying to be funny.
fretman411 1 year ago
Damn Beckham is small
IMakeHistory2 1 year ago
@IMakeHistory2
hes 6 ft!! but i think he weighs like 165
Ashton5TV 1 year ago
davids like... wheres the yellow card, ref?!
play2kick7 1 year ago
Someone should tell Beckham that you're allowed to knocked people down. Can't do any of that fake pain crap to get the other team sent off.
clickclocks 1 year ago
FOR ALL YOU YANKS..
THAT WASN'T EVEN BECKHAM BEING TACKLED. stunt double
djrowlee 1 year ago
Just imagine if that was Ray Lewis hitting him...
ArmyofUglyAnon 1 year ago 21
@ArmyofUglyAnon R.I.P david beckham if that happened
Sketch828 1 year ago
did he say this man is gay
SoccerHYR 1 year ago
@SoccerHYR he said "this is a man's game"
Galactic123 1 year ago
lol@beckham laying there
sorry we don't have red and yellow cards in america
dnbjarhead 1 year ago 2
@dnbjarhead Actually, we do have yellow and red cars in America - they're used in many, many sports. Football (soccer) is a contact sport but of a different sort., since the goal is not to tackle your opponent. Going studs up on the back of someone's leg is 'reckless,' and therefore a red card. That's what red cards are usually given for - reckless behavior. There is no sport that doesn't give out penalties for reckless behavior - American football is FULL of penalties of just that sort.
jhille85 1 year ago
David beckham is a pussy
asurox96 1 year ago
Look at beckham, he can hardly breathe and there just doing warmups..and he was one of the best soccer players
PhantomXII 1 year ago
beckhams like "F*** that hurt" and that wasn't even a tackle lol
PhantomXII 1 year ago
No they dont run more even if they do they have breaks after every single play what are you talking about?
cescudify 1 year ago
@cescudify Yes they do run more because in Football, they run every play...in soccer they only run if they have the ball or are attacking but most of the time its just passing and jogging....I watch and play both sports....and yes, American Footballers run more
PhantomXII 1 year ago
@PhantomXII haha. that has got to be the dumbest thing ive ever heard. the sad thing is, tennis players run more in a 5 set match than NFL players run during a game!
thedynamite85 1 year ago
@thedynamite85 You can believe what ever you want but if you actually watch & play Football then you'd understand
PhantomXII 1 year ago