John Holdren on Science Debate

[apresesco]

Where does John P. Holdren live? I want to collaborate with the population control program and he seems like a good guinea pig for my scientific experiment.

Mwahaha >:)

[youngdones]

This guy wants you and your whole family dead.

[narutocaprirequest2]

this guy is one evil $%^k and needs to die

[chemerich]

He should be the President of the United States. Only scientists can save the world from disaster.

[catalinaguerrero]

@chemerich lol there are scientists full of shit and holdren is one of them

[apresesco]

@chemerich Josef Mengele was also a scientist...

J. P. Holdren advocates for forced mass sterilization and abortions in his book "Ecoscience: Population, Resources and Development".

P.S: I also think that scientists should participate more in politics...but the good ones, not the religious

fanatics and psychologically disturbed like J. P. Holdren.

[chemerich]

@apresesco

"Josef Mengele was also a scientist"

Hitler was a politician and also a painter. Should we ban politicians and painters from politics?.

"J. P. Holdren advocates for forced mass sterilization and abortions"

Not forced but freely !.

"but the good ones, not the religious"

So, J. P. Holdren is a good one. He's not religious !.

[apresesco]

@chemerich I said Mengele to show you that scientists are not always "the good guys" because of what you said before.

[apresesco]

@chemerich "Not forced but freely !."

Nope, forced. He openly advocates totalitarian measures such as mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply (page 787-8) and forced compulsory abortions (page 837).

[chemerich]

@apresesco

He warns us of the harsh consequence that will happen if the population continues its growth.

[apresesco]

@chemerich You still have not answered why he has so many grandchildren. Even Dr. Eric Pianka is less hypocritical.

[crisisofconsciousnes]

@chemerich the world is not over populated, the wealth is just unbalanced

[chemerich]

@crisisofconsciousnes

The world population is growing exponentially. Even if the wealth was distributed equally among the peoples of the world, there would be less for everyone, because the population is growing so fast. The earth cannot withstand more exploitation, we are already running short of natural resources !.

[crisisofconsciousnes]

@chemerich who told you this?

[chemerich]

@crisisofconsciousnes

You can do your own research if you don't believe me

[InTheKnow88]

Holdren, we do care, and that is why we want you out of here. Realize the evil you do and repent. If you don't turn away from it the Lord's gonna get you in the end.

[CCOURTNEY1001]

i wish i could cut the throat of this mason bra he wana depopulate the world, lets start with his family since these masons are the only ones  who feels their is a problem, lets knock em offf first

[mastadonboner69]

@CCOURTNEY1001 you're a fucking idiot

[zashev]

reading uneducated redneck christian nutters comments on this video is both fun and scary in the same time!

[Gracelandification]

John Holdren is Obama's appointed Science Czar. Like all Czars, they were not approved by the Senate, which is unconstitutional. He advocated in his book "Ecoscience", sterilization of the human population by adding a sterilization drug to the food and water supply and the government taking babies away from single mom's. GOOGLE “zombietime john holdren” and click on link.

.

Allen West 2012

[videogme]

CLIMATE GATE!

[rowgun500]

Notice the vipers tongue at 0.01!

[TheBoxerDogs]

John Holdren, God will judge you one day..

[TheMadPorcupine]

why would somebody listen to this clown period.

[joein1972]

A real live eugenics advisor to Obama

[Jenkdiesel]

This guy is fucking insane, how the hell did he even come close to acknowledgement in the scientific community when he openly supports eugenics, and sterilization.

[joein1972]

I agree this ugly open eugenicist is coming for us. Imagine a proven authored live advisor to the president Obama knows he wrote the book on eugenics back in the 1970s Is this the change thats in his evil book or is it the play book for Obama

[andrewada]

You might find this interesting:

Google:

"operation population control" "building utopia"

There is a place and need for population control.

[hopkins4545]

He's a piece of shit and I'm surprised Obama has him in his cabinet

[btwall60]

This asshole is an absolute Nazi, and we are now going to hav 2 start asking some tuff Q's of the Megalomaniac that APPOINTED HIM. What is happening here? Every DAY O comes out with a new TRILLION $ IDEA, HE IS SPENDING US INTO THE STONE-AGE. Holdren is dr Mengala, when will the concentration camps start opening? Czars galore, un elected, un accountable, but to who? Mr. MOM's Jeans thats who. Sotomayor stuff is going on in PUBLIC, but he keeps pushing the robbery of treasury thru "healthcare"

[ozzycriss]

Holdren has said Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. And a Planetary Regime with the power of life and death over American citizens is good . You ve been for warned

[Clyaton]

Absolutely true, it's in HIS own authored book............. HE WROTE THIS CRAZY SHIT. Please speak out about this, I know I am. Not just on YT.

[gazwilwah]

This man is Mengele, Nazi's have taken over the Whitehouse.

[zashev]

@gazwilwah, you are an uneducated fool and your words are offensive in more than one way.

[twilswins]

Please don't do what you want to do.

[modifiedcontent]

John Holdren, 1977: "... One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings ... "

z o m b i e t i m e . c o m / j o h n _ h o l d r e n

[modifiedcontent]

John Holdren, 1977: "... A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. ..."

z o m b i e t i m e . c o m / j o h n _ h o l d r e n

[zashev]

@modifiedcontent what is wrong with that?

[polyrhythmic1]

UFO Disclosure is crucial to science and technology and our future! Tell the truth about what really crashed near Roswell in 1947!

[TheThomaswastaken]

I like that a man who tacitly condemns Obama for not attending the Science Debate 2008 is now his science advisor. Surrounding Obama with people who put science first should incline him towards a real appreciation of sciences role in this world.

[cheekieweekie]

Will real science convict based on the 911 videos of building demolitions that themselves are actionable proof of government complicity? Is this guy smart enough to know 911 was a fraud - then he knows why his job is to do the opposite and keep americans dumb or they will quesition 911 and hang the republican murderers in a giant witch hunt.

[Brownyman]

Conspiracies aside, it is not within the moral or intellectual compass of any real scientist to mislead or dumb down anyone or anything. Any person who does isn't a scientist.

[TheThomaswastaken]

I've seen the videos of 9/11 and I disagree with the assessment that there were controlled demolitions of any of the buildings that fell on 9/11. I've seen videos, that were said to be videos of 9/11, in which a building was demolished, but it wasn't one of the three that fell that day. I have also seen the windows blowing out on the twin towers which looks nothing like a demolition to me. A demolition would blow out columns on every floor all the way down, not 3 windows in random spots.

[cheekieweekie]

The theory of a progressive top down collapse is not keeping with the laws of momentum at free-fall speed. This alone should be enough evidence for a physics minded person. That, and the fact that steel does not fly apart sideways (watch those horizontal vectors) without an accelerating force... steel never melts in a fire - see the buncefield fire that burned 55 million gallons - no melted steel - fire out in days.

[TheThomaswastaken]

"The theory of a progressive top down collapse is not keeping with the laws of momentum at free-fall speed." -- You are talking out of your butt. ---- "That, and the fact that steel does not fly apart sideways (watch those horizontal vectors) without an accelerating force." -- The unstated premise is that there was steel flying apart sideways...which there wasn't. Only tumbling away at free fall. -- "steel never melts in a fire." -- Then how do you suppose people forge steel? Fire+steel=Soften

[cheekieweekie]

The official story of why there is no aircraft remains at the pentagon is that the aviation fuel *vaporized the whole plane* - leaving identifiable bodies apparently. How can any person claim to be science minded whilst pretending that such utter rubbish is plausible.

[TheThomaswastaken]

"The official story of why there is no aircraft remains at the pentagon is that the aviation fuel *vaporized the whole plane*"

--

That's called the straw man logical fallacy. It's also a red herring.

You didn't address my point, you dodged it. Also, the official story includes hundreds of pictures of plane pieces strewn across the field in front of, and hallways between rooms of, the pentagon. There is no reports of vaporizing the whole plane.

[cheekieweekie]

There is no plane at the pentagon - they say it went up in the fire - no luggage, no seats - look at the photos yourself and be a scientist.

Steel does not melt except in a controlled burn blast furnace. If you think you can melt steel using a regular fire, i challenge you to build a bonfire in your back yard and get steel to melt. What the official report suggests is a pancake collapse without pancakes - how utterly absurd antiscience.

[cheekieweekie]

Steel does not fly apart - ever, even in a fire. Any person who does mechanics can calculate the horizontal acceleration necessary to push a 30 ton object 200 meters in 10 seconds. The energy source for the banana peeling horizontal vectors is what - all you physicists out there? Only explosives could blow apart a steel framed object... under a normal fire collapse, the frame would have slowly, and asymetrically distort and fail in only the damaged parts of the structure.

[cheekieweekie]

You can't be a scientist with physics knowledge and still believe that a 45 minute fire will melt 5 inch thick steel... period.

You can't be a scientist and see a 330ton steel section of wall hurled from a building without questioning the source of the equal and opposite acceleration that hurled it. IF you drop 330 tons from stationary at 400 meters, it will not fly sideways, it will go straight down. The fire explanation is incoherent with the physics.

[TheThomaswastaken]

"You can't be a scientist with physics knowledge..."

--

Exactly what I was thinking about you.

Since you keep appealing to the authority of the professional scientists in the appropriate fields (physics), why aren't you listening to their opinions? The whole staff of Popular Mechanics Magazine are professionals in their fields. They put out an entire magazine dedicated to dozens of science fields all disproving the claims of 9/11 truthers (like yourself). Go read it, and double-check yourself.

[TheThomaswastaken]

"You can't be a scientist with physics knowledge and still believe that a 45 minute fire will melt 5 inch thick steel... period." -- You think exposing steel to fire for hours wouldn't weaken the steel? -- "You can't be a scientist and see a 330ton steel section of wall hurled from a building ... " -- You are making up events, nothing similar to this happened. -- "IF you drop 330 tons from stationary at 400 meters,..." -- You think a falling building would create a clean square rubble pile?

[cheekieweekie]

Your physics knowledge is failing you. The popular science article was debunked ages ago by kevan ryan and actual engineers and architects - not just republican bullshit hobbiests like the NIST, the 911 commission (that included nothing but republican coverup criminals). Steel does not fly apart - that's why not a single steel framed building in the world has ever collapsed due to fire.

You clearly are no engineer.

[TheThomaswastaken]

"The popular science article was debunked ages ago by kevan ryan and actual engineers and architects -..."

--

Thousands of engineers read this magazine every time they put out an article, and you believe a handful over those thousands? You really like to think the whole world is in on this conspiracy. If you just stopped adding people to the list of conspirators you would realize how much bullshit you believe.

How many are there?

The airplane company, the reps (50% of our nation), pop mechs...

[TheThomaswastaken]

"...that's why not a single steel framed building in the world has ever collapsed due to fire.

You clearly are no engineer. "

--

It took me 4 seconds on Google to find another steel-framed building that collapsed (ESP plant in the Enigma Business Park, near Malvern) in a fire. Stop swallowing their bullshit without even considering if it might be a lie...it is a lie btw all of it.

You say I am not an engineer like it's a bad thing, but are you an engineer? So how can you hold that against me?

[johnnyfatsac]

Good job John Holdren for being named Obama's Science Advisor. Real science has been absent from the White House for 8 years.

[Brownyman]

Yes, yes, YES! :D