The solos are INFINITELY BETTER than Azagthoth's. In fact Azagthoth is one of the sloppiest guitar players ever. Still that's what makes his style unique, I guess. I love Morbid Angel don't take me wrong, but Akercocke are much better musicians. However I am obliged to say that Morbid Angel are a cornerstone in Death Metal. Technicality isn't that important in Death Metal. Originality and creativity are. Thumbs up for Akercocke and Morbid Angel.
@joaohenriques32353 Yeah, man. That's what I feel towards this version. Fucking great solos, and I also dare say that the atmosphere of the original song is still here, but we cannot identify it due to the crystal clear production.
@joaohenriques32353 i totally disagree and i'm sure there are a legion of metalheads who would say toherwise, including Ackercocke. remimber they are Tributing to Morbid Angel, thus they greatly respect Trey and Morbids work. to say such a thing is a slap in the face of death metal
It goes without saying no one comes close to Trey in terms of the art of death metal guitar playing....Akercocke is a great band as well though. I'll give them a A for the effort. All hail MORBID ANGEL!
Hey look they got cock in their name! Let's be immature!
Actually it's from the name of a certain monkey. I won't say more, I will let you go to google and search and actually fight for knowledge. could do you good.
I like both bands I like morbid angel more cause that's just my opinion I think this is a valid cover, but the vox david vincent did were better, and the solos here are better it's all just artistic stylization, and if you knew why they were called akercocke you'd think it was cool, that and if you're so grossed out by naughty body parts then why do you listen to death metal?
@rashadpwnzuall Well a cover isn't supposed to be "better" than the original, it's just a tribute and a different take on the song by the band doing the cover/tribute.
Good cover and Akercocke is an incredible band, but it does not reach the blasphemous glory of the original. I lover Akercocke, but not by a long shot does it reach the original.
Good one bro, because I like the original version (The OLDER version!) I'm somehow a 6 year old, versus the kid who likes AkerCOCKe, a shitty band that barely started making slightly listenable albums after 2001. Not only that, they made a sub-par, and inferior cover of a pioneering death metal act, that is quite frankly and insult to the original song. Fuck off.
You didn't name multiple reasons. This first reason is valid. The second reason is more of an opinion that the first reason. Whether you believe it or not, the original can be enjoyed without DragonForce production.
3: another simple opinion being presented as fact. They are better to you, and that's it. Also, it's not my fault Ackercocke decided to name their band something as ridiculous as they have. It's not really inDICKative of anything, other than the sheer malice I hold to this band.
Illud Divinum Insanus.
EmperorSheepy 1 month ago
Illud Divinum Insanus. Discuss.
joaohenriques32353 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CLASSIC! I just posted my drum cover of Chapel of Ghouls. Please check it out and let me know what you think.
Wingnut629 2 months ago
I must admit that the cover is much better than the original!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MegaGermanoMosconi 2 months ago 2
This version is sick wicked. there's no lava though. Too many arpeggiated solo sequences and minor scale shit to sound like Trey's chaotic wailing.
Rapedbyaclown666 8 months ago
@Rapedbyaclown666 The last Akercocke guitarist was a lot better and more chaotic, Willcock's ok but too many of his solos sound the same.
UnyieldingDefiance 2 weeks ago
I LIKE AKERCOCKE,BUT THEY COULD HAVE AT LEAST GOTTEN THE RHYTHM GUITARS RIGHT
blaspherian 10 months ago
Great cover. But it sounds like Putrid Pile is covering the tune. Sick vox either way. The solos tear major ass \m/
runnerjma 11 months ago
i think akercocke's words that go unspoken is a masterpiece....my fav album of the last 10 years...but this sucks..sorry
amigaorange 1 year ago
The solos are INFINITELY BETTER than Azagthoth's. In fact Azagthoth is one of the sloppiest guitar players ever. Still that's what makes his style unique, I guess. I love Morbid Angel don't take me wrong, but Akercocke are much better musicians. However I am obliged to say that Morbid Angel are a cornerstone in Death Metal. Technicality isn't that important in Death Metal. Originality and creativity are. Thumbs up for Akercocke and Morbid Angel.
joaohenriques32353 1 year ago 2
@joaohenriques32353 Yeah, man. That's what I feel towards this version. Fucking great solos, and I also dare say that the atmosphere of the original song is still here, but we cannot identify it due to the crystal clear production.
skeptikatheist 1 year ago
@joaohenriques32353
Its a joke? Azagthoth is way better than this...
elric36 1 year ago
@elric36 Illud Divinum Insanus. That's all I wanted to say.
joaohenriques32353 1 month ago
@elric36 Illud Divinum Insanus.
joaohenriques32353 1 month ago
@joaohenriques32353 i totally disagree and i'm sure there are a legion of metalheads who would say toherwise, including Ackercocke. remimber they are Tributing to Morbid Angel, thus they greatly respect Trey and Morbids work. to say such a thing is a slap in the face of death metal
lordvladislas 10 months ago
@lordvladislas to listen to morbid angels latest is a slap in the face of death metal hahahahaha
NicolaeWaugh 8 months ago
@lordvladislas Illud Divinum Insanus says I'm right and you're wrong. Morbid Angel sucks.
joaohenriques32353 1 month ago
awesome cover!
TheWsobchak 1 year ago
Why isn't this on my fucking copy?
purplehazethc 1 year ago
The vocals are short in places, as if he's missing out words. Cool cover though.
6Vital6Remains6 1 year ago
Wow, they totally screwed up the evil and malicious vibe that the original had, way to miss the point of Morbid Angel guys!
Mutantvision 1 year ago 4
It goes without saying no one comes close to Trey in terms of the art of death metal guitar playing....Akercocke is a great band as well though. I'll give them a A for the effort. All hail MORBID ANGEL!
BiorythmicDrifter 1 year ago
Hey look they got cock in their name! Let's be immature!
Actually it's from the name of a certain monkey. I won't say more, I will let you go to google and search and actually fight for knowledge. could do you good.
Makool 2 years ago
@Makool
Children, for the most part have not read Faust's Bargain, friend. lol
purplehazethc 1 year ago
I like both bands I like morbid angel more cause that's just my opinion I think this is a valid cover, but the vox david vincent did were better, and the solos here are better it's all just artistic stylization, and if you knew why they were called akercocke you'd think it was cool, that and if you're so grossed out by naughty body parts then why do you listen to death metal?
metalsven6669 2 years ago 2
buen cover
CANNIBAL696MAGGOT 2 years ago
I'll just stick with the original. Can't beat Morbid Angel!
rashadpwnzuall 2 years ago 14
@rashadpwnzuall Well a cover isn't supposed to be "better" than the original, it's just a tribute and a different take on the song by the band doing the cover/tribute.
MoonOvIce 5 months ago
Good cover and Akercocke is an incredible band, but it does not reach the blasphemous glory of the original. I lover Akercocke, but not by a long shot does it reach the original.
Slotff 2 years ago 9
Oh you guys know what would be great? If you would stop arguing like little bitches and enjoy the music, agreed?
InsanityOverdose 2 years ago
Much agreed. If they don't like it, then fuck off.
Slotff 2 years ago
Wow, he could at least try to pronounce the words. jesus fuck this cover had a lot of potential. Oh well.
Kataxu 2 years ago
are you fucking retarded? this cover is 10x better then the original
Shavo11 2 years ago
Maybe if I had the musical taste of a 6 year old down-syndrome homosexual.
Kataxu 2 years ago
dont worry, you'll turn 6 in a year.
Shavo11 2 years ago
Good one bro, because I like the original version (The OLDER version!) I'm somehow a 6 year old, versus the kid who likes AkerCOCKe, a shitty band that barely started making slightly listenable albums after 2001. Not only that, they made a sub-par, and inferior cover of a pioneering death metal act, that is quite frankly and insult to the original song. Fuck off.
Kataxu 2 years ago
Actually this song is better than the original for multiple reasons.
-The solos aren't comprised of random wanking on the wammy and random notes, they are a huge improvement over the original.
-The sound quality makes it much more enjoyable. (although this couldn't really be helped on the original.)
-Akercocke (capitalizing the COCK is very indicitave of your immaturity by the way) is leagues better than morbid angel.
orugnet 2 years ago
You didn't name multiple reasons. This first reason is valid. The second reason is more of an opinion that the first reason. Whether you believe it or not, the original can be enjoyed without DragonForce production.
3: another simple opinion being presented as fact. They are better to you, and that's it. Also, it's not my fault Ackercocke decided to name their band something as ridiculous as they have. It's not really inDICKative of anything, other than the sheer malice I hold to this band.
Kataxu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no
fucking
way
purplehazethc 2 years ago
Better than the original in every way, amazing solos.
orugnet 2 years ago
I don't think it sucks in comparison to the original, but it definitely isn't as good. I think they did it well and in their own style.
Tokifan7 2 years ago
Butchered.
chance199 2 years ago
this fucking sucks ass compared to the original. they completley butchered this song.
DuskofCivilization 2 years ago
not very good, and I love the original
psyshock918 2 years ago
Awesome, now only if the original version had the solos of this version!
DraconionDevil 3 years ago
lol wtf I never said the original was bad
DraconionDevil 2 years ago