There is no such thing as "free energy". Turbos might generally be more efficient at creating boost than a roots supercharger, but they still take horsepower from the engine to operate.
The energy required to force all that extra air into the engine has to come from somewhere.
True, and the real effect of turbos is to effectively increase the engine's capacity as a function of boost. An engine which ingests more air via boost needs more fuel accordingly, but since it usually has lower compression and hotter intake temperature, the effective capacity increase does not scale with the boost. It's a good way to increase the output of a smaller, lighter engine, but it's not free power by any means, and it does add complexity. Great for diesels!
@MoronAntidote You build them right and they last as long as intended. Besides, a engine isn't running boost all the time. For example, my supercharged 383 spends 99% of its time cruising around as a 8.75 to 1 low stress motor. With low boost it makes around 500HP. Compare that to runing around town with a high compression/rpm NA 383 with the same HP and I promise you my SC 383 would live longer. (And is a hell of a lot more streetable too!)
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but what we're talking about is increased peak power vs average power over time. Yes, you could achieve the same longevity as a stock engine if you were careful, but people who build engines in this way do so because they enjoy the thrill of acceleration. I'll accept it's well built and tuned, but i'll wager my left leg you boot it enough to 'on average' stress the engine greater than a stock engine could be stressed. I would, so why argue?
@MoronAntidote "i'll wager my left leg you boot it enough to 'on average' stress the engine greater than a stock engine could be stressed"
Duh, that's why I said "if you build it right." And I'm not comparing my engine to a stock engine's longevity, I'm comparing my 500HP supercharged engine to a naturally aspirated 500HP engine of the same displacement and making the point that my engine will live longer.
Btw i had no intention of getting into this kind of argument. I drive a stock e46 330i and i appreciate it. I have no desire to get caught up in arguments about particular engines, but as an engineer, i get frustrated by all the bullshit about torque vs horsepower. That's the only reason i posted tbh.
That's what I like about diesel engines, they produce most of their torque at low rpms. Like, for example, a 1.8 litre turbodiesel engine puts 120 bhp @ 3500 rpm and, say 200+ ft-lbs. of torque @ 1800 rpm.
Makes for a very transient unexciting experience. A brief squirt then all over.
The torque sounds good on paper, but because the rpm range is so low, the gearing is stretched, so you have no more torque at the wheels. It's wheel torque that determines acceleration.
Power to weight ratio is the best indicator of acceleration, given appropriate gearing.
Torque means nothing by itself. Power at a given rpm is the size of the pie. The gearing determines how you divide up the pie. You basically trade torque (acceleration) for speed in that gear. Either way, the bigger the pie the better, so power wins.
You do realise that gearboxes and final drives modify the engine torque don't you?
I suspect not, and this is one of the main reasons why people can't grasp the torque/horsepower thing. This video doesn't help at all, because it's trying to explain something in words which is best explained mathematically. Once you see the math it all becomes clear. I don't think you get it right now.
Hi, so why does a car with more torque accelerate faster at lower rpm? also why wont having a lot of torque make a car fast alone? why is hp needed also?
@dualCranKy so what does torque specifically do for a car, say other than used for pulling stuff like in a truck. why is torque important in drifting also?
Acceleration at any rpm is proportional to engine torque, gearing, weight, drag and losses. HP is proportional to engine torque and rpm, and apart from transmission loss is conserved at the wheels regardless of gearing etc. Since engine horsepower is the product of torque and rpm, then the higher the horsepower, the more you've got to play with in terms of varying the ratio between wheel torque and rpm via GEARING. Power to weight ratio is king for a good reason.
@Seattlecarnut Because he's awesome. His old videos were re-uploaded by third parties. chughes376 and davidsfarmfans. His new channel is davidsfarmlives (with new videos)
I've been trying to understand the relationship between torque & horsepower for years, and in just the few minutes it took to watch this video, the light finally came on for me. Thanks so much!
Thank you so much for explaining!!! For those of you who might not have caught it, torque is how much 'force' or 'power' the engine is creating, and HP is the amount of work it can do in relation to the RPM's. He explaines it so well at 4:08 - 5:03.
@ammarns Hp is how fast something is moved. 1 Hp = 75 Kg moved up 1 meter in 1 second. Hp is also nothing that can be measured but it's calculated. You can measure both torque (engine force) and rpm (engine speed) and use these to calculate the Hp.
Comment removed
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
There is no such thing as "free energy". Turbos might generally be more efficient at creating boost than a roots supercharger, but they still take horsepower from the engine to operate.
The energy required to force all that extra air into the engine has to come from somewhere.
177SCmaro 3 months ago
@177SCmaro
True, and the real effect of turbos is to effectively increase the engine's capacity as a function of boost. An engine which ingests more air via boost needs more fuel accordingly, but since it usually has lower compression and hotter intake temperature, the effective capacity increase does not scale with the boost. It's a good way to increase the output of a smaller, lighter engine, but it's not free power by any means, and it does add complexity. Great for diesels!
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
@MoronAntidote Great for a 383 Chevy too.
177SCmaro 1 month ago
@177SCmaro
Great for any engine up to a point. But let's not pretend they'll last as long as intended ;)
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
@MoronAntidote You build them right and they last as long as intended. Besides, a engine isn't running boost all the time. For example, my supercharged 383 spends 99% of its time cruising around as a 8.75 to 1 low stress motor. With low boost it makes around 500HP. Compare that to runing around town with a high compression/rpm NA 383 with the same HP and I promise you my SC 383 would live longer. (And is a hell of a lot more streetable too!)
177SCmaro 1 month ago
@177SCmaro
I appreciate your enthusiasm, but what we're talking about is increased peak power vs average power over time. Yes, you could achieve the same longevity as a stock engine if you were careful, but people who build engines in this way do so because they enjoy the thrill of acceleration. I'll accept it's well built and tuned, but i'll wager my left leg you boot it enough to 'on average' stress the engine greater than a stock engine could be stressed. I would, so why argue?
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote "i'll wager my left leg you boot it enough to 'on average' stress the engine greater than a stock engine could be stressed"
Duh, that's why I said "if you build it right." And I'm not comparing my engine to a stock engine's longevity, I'm comparing my 500HP supercharged engine to a naturally aspirated 500HP engine of the same displacement and making the point that my engine will live longer.
That's all I meant. No argument intended.
177SCmaro 1 month ago
@177SCmaro
Btw i had no intention of getting into this kind of argument. I drive a stock e46 330i and i appreciate it. I have no desire to get caught up in arguments about particular engines, but as an engineer, i get frustrated by all the bullshit about torque vs horsepower. That's the only reason i posted tbh.
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
so is horsepower dependent on rpm? or the ratio with rpm and torque?
ramentasty8 4 months ago
@ramentasty8 I dunno, ask 'davidsfarmlives' and link to this video
chughes374 4 months ago
@ramentasty8 torque times (rpm/5252)= horsepower, for a conventional engine.
jvanegas14 1 week ago
That's what I like about diesel engines, they produce most of their torque at low rpms. Like, for example, a 1.8 litre turbodiesel engine puts 120 bhp @ 3500 rpm and, say 200+ ft-lbs. of torque @ 1800 rpm.
Seattlecarnut 4 months ago
@Seattlecarnut
Makes for a very transient unexciting experience. A brief squirt then all over.
The torque sounds good on paper, but because the rpm range is so low, the gearing is stretched, so you have no more torque at the wheels. It's wheel torque that determines acceleration.
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
@MoronAntidote In that case, the more torque, the faster the acceleration.
Seattlecarnut 1 month ago
@Seattlecarnut
Wheel torque determines acceleration, not engine torque.
Low revving engines requires taller gearing, which reduces wheel torque.
If you made that engine produce its torque over a wider rpm range, you could use shorter gearing, and produce more wheel torque.
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
@Seattlecarnut
Power to weight ratio is the best indicator of acceleration, given appropriate gearing.
Torque means nothing by itself. Power at a given rpm is the size of the pie. The gearing determines how you divide up the pie. You basically trade torque (acceleration) for speed in that gear. Either way, the bigger the pie the better, so power wins.
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
@Seattlecarnut
You do realise that gearboxes and final drives modify the engine torque don't you?
I suspect not, and this is one of the main reasons why people can't grasp the torque/horsepower thing. This video doesn't help at all, because it's trying to explain something in words which is best explained mathematically. Once you see the math it all becomes clear. I don't think you get it right now.
MoronAntidote 1 month ago
Hi, so why does a car with more torque accelerate faster at lower rpm? also why wont having a lot of torque make a car fast alone? why is hp needed also?
ichigokillsyou 6 months ago
@ichigokillsyou The power itself is just the HP.
A car with more torque usually creates that torque in lower RPM, so it will have indeed also more HP, which is the important thing, in the lower RPM.
dualCranKy 5 months ago
@dualCranKy so what does torque specifically do for a car, say other than used for pulling stuff like in a truck. why is torque important in drifting also?
ichigokillsyou 5 months ago
@ichigokillsyou Its not really important... What is important is, that you choose the right gearbox for the right speeds...
Example:
You could get out of 50 Nm like 500 Nm with the right gear.
But instead of 1000 RPM your car would only transfer 100 to the tires.
But if your car can spin up to 10000RPM you could transer 1000 RPM to the tires.
I wasnt really right with my first post...
I depends on when the car creates how much torque and usually the better the powerband, the higher the hp.
dualCranKy 5 months ago
@dualCranKy
NO NO NO
Acceleration at any rpm is proportional to engine torque, gearing, weight, drag and losses. HP is proportional to engine torque and rpm, and apart from transmission loss is conserved at the wheels regardless of gearing etc. Since engine horsepower is the product of torque and rpm, then the higher the horsepower, the more you've got to play with in terms of varying the ratio between wheel torque and rpm via GEARING. Power to weight ratio is king for a good reason.
MoronAntidote 4 months ago
How the hell was David able to make videos? I thought his videos were removed from You Tube?
Seattlecarnut 6 months ago
@Seattlecarnut Because he's awesome. His old videos were re-uploaded by third parties. chughes376 and davidsfarmfans. His new channel is davidsfarmlives (with new videos)
chughes374 4 months ago
@chughes374 I'll have to check them out. Thanks.
Seattlecarnut 4 months ago
I've been trying to understand the relationship between torque & horsepower for years, and in just the few minutes it took to watch this video, the light finally came on for me. Thanks so much!
ngreatshark 7 months ago
Thank you so much for explaining!!! For those of you who might not have caught it, torque is how much 'force' or 'power' the engine is creating, and HP is the amount of work it can do in relation to the RPM's. He explaines it so well at 4:08 - 5:03.
techman360 7 months ago
I had no idea it was going to be David! ::Faints::
Dillon1791 7 months ago
@Dillon1791 his new channel is 'davidsfarmlives' . My channel is just a re-uplaoad
chughes374 7 months ago
@chughes374 i knew about his new channel for a while-i still had no idea it would be him here tho.
Dillon1791 7 months ago
Alot of knowledge gained from this video, thanks alot for the information.
Jah2070 8 months ago
Comment removed
Jah2070 8 months ago
Ok, but what is torque and what is horsepower?
hattrickzero 9 months ago
thanks man sweet video
vT4K 9 months ago
torque: how much work can be done
hp: how much work is done in a certain time.
levin666 9 months ago
I still haven't heard an understandable explanation for horsepower yet. Or I keep missing the explanation.
BAMBAM3316 9 months ago
Very helpful thanks!,
thecelebspy 9 months ago
I was able to understand the meaning of torque, but i'm still confused about what the horse power of the engine really is :(
ammarns 10 months ago
@ammarns Hp is how fast something is moved. 1 Hp = 75 Kg moved up 1 meter in 1 second. Hp is also nothing that can be measured but it's calculated. You can measure both torque (engine force) and rpm (engine speed) and use these to calculate the Hp.
alow070 9 months ago
thanks Dave glad ur on you tube some where
rubypuppy7 10 months ago
needs more views
12edDemon 10 months ago
yeah that was very helpful
offroadskillz 10 months ago
thanks! very usable information
proto993 11 months ago
Masterfully done!
neumei626 11 months ago
very nicely explained... i love it!
ahmadbila06 1 year ago