Continued... There may have been a 'moon pool' built into the lower deck, which would force constant air exchange through the window around the top of the Ark (ventilation), the Ark wasn't built to 'cruise', it just floated; no propulsion or navigation system was needed. Only about 21,000 animals were on the Ark... two of each 'kind' of unclean, and seven of each clean 'kind' ('species' is just a man-made system of classification).
Scoffers are truly hilarious with their snarky attitudes and haughty, condescending questions. It's clear they have no intention of considering any answers a believer offers. But, just in case... God sent young animals to Noah, not full grown ones; they entered the Ark and went into a hibernation state, so they required little food or water and did not eliminate huge amounts of excreta. Water wasn't stored inside the Ark, but there was most likely a cistern of sorts built into the roof.
Noah's Arc was a lot smaller and actualy held the DNA of every creature and not the creature it self, I can't believe people are still worshiping this... Look at the ancient text all over the world... When people first started to wright they wrote down their history and actual events...
So ask your self this, What god needs a Vehicle to fly???
A Circle within a Circle sounds like Technology to me.
A bit of topic but I don't care, The bibal is a Fabricated truth of alien encounters.
Erm...surely someone asked this already, but what did the carnivores eat for 40-days while it was raining? And, what did they do after wards when they got back onto dry-land? I mean, all the animals, except those on the ark, were dead right? So the only thing for them to eat, were the other animal on the ark. Maybe that's what happened to the dinosaurs?
@blueray1969 The carnivors ate meat, additional animals were taken onboard the ark as food surplus to be slaughtered as and when required for carnivores. When the animals came out of the ark those same animals that were slaughtered for food were also bread for the sole purpose of repopulating the land and providing food for carnivores when released.
@blueray1969 Noah knew there would be a period of time after he came off the Ark where there would be little food. Most people would have the intelligence to think a little further than the next 40 days ahead and prepare for it. Its common sence !
If I gave you two rabbits, how long do you think it would be before you had twenty?
Now do this with rats, gophers, koalas, opossums, squirrels, weasels, and many other animals, add to this the fact that the Ark actually had spare room for mass food and water storage. It truly was not an issue.
@HawleyluYah I imagine, even if the herbivores were able to breed on board, it would be several months before there were 20 rabbits. But tell me, what did the carnivores eat while they were working for the bunny rabbits to breed? You see, even if the lions, tigers, cheetahs, tasmanian devils, snakes etc etc etc only had one rabbit between all of them...no more bunny rabbits. the boat would have to be huge and would have to contain many many "food herbivores".
@HawleyluYah and I was just wondering where they found the polar bears, rattlesnakes and koalas from. Or did they all evolve from the bears that Noah saved?
Your on the right track, but you must first toss aside the teachings of evolution. Of bear kind (Genus level) only one male and female needed to come aboard. All other species of Genus Ursus (that are truly bear species) could then come about again through the process of natural selection and adaptation, note this is not macro evolution, but micro, which is adaptation. Also we are talking sky and land animals here, not sea.
@HawleyluYah i see. so how long ago was the ark and just wondered, how did the polar bear get to the north pole and the koalas get to australia...did Noah give them a lift?
@HawleyluYah Over hundreds of thousands of years, evolved from other animals. They weren't picked up and then dropped off after a 40-day boating trip. Was the a serious question? How can you compare the two lol.
You can't compare the two as far as time, :) but even evolution will not deny that a polar bear and a black bear come from the same past, Time has always been the magic bullet of evolution. coal, oil, diamonds, all took millions of years, but that two has been proven false. Most can be done in days.
Two bears got off the ark, they multiplied, they spread out as the population grew. as they moved out into other climates, they adapted.
@HawleyluYah somewhere over 4,000 years ago you said. Australia was still Australia 4,000 years ago. It has been an island separated from the European/Asian and American land-masses for millions of years. So when Noah dropped off his 2 bears, how did they multiply AND manage to get to the other side of the earth? Or maybe when you say "more than 4,000 years ago" you mean "many millions of years ago"? How long for a bear to swim from Israel to Australia?
No, we're not talking story's full of holes here, if so , we would be talking about something like Lucy, we both know that if she had feet they would be able to pick up fruit, :), Yet we also know that human footprints were found in the very rock they used to date her, could it be a dating problem, hmmmm.
As for the flood, tell me, , what type of stones are fossils found in and why?
How long would it take for 3 men and 3 women to populate a planet the size of earth?
@HawleyluYah Ah...so that explains it. The Ark had a year's worth of herbivores to feed the carnivores (although I read somewhere they only had 7 of each). That's a lot of vegetation they had to have in storage...not sure how you keep insects alive with rice/wheat grains, and then Noah sailed round the earth dropping off the relevant species on the correct islands?
Who said he had to worry about insects? You try so hard to discredit scripture, if you would put half the enthusiasm into questioning Evolution, you would have turned from that long ago.
Did you figure out what rock you find fossils in and why?
Or how long it would take six people to populate an earth size plaint?
A new one, why are the oldest trees on earth only slightly older then 4000 years?
Why are human footprints found in rock that dates way older then humans?
@HawleyluYah Many many people have questioned evolution. That is why it passed the test and became a theory...from empirical testing. There are sea shells up mountains because mountains are formed from new eruptions, pushing the landmass up. You can read that on wiki. I question scripture which is clearly nonsense and full of holes.
You see, you look at shells on a mountain top and say see the land came up out of the water, I look and say that supports a flood that even the highest peek was covered in a cataclysmic disaster.
In your religion, you expect to find the law of superposition, in mine, I expect to find spontaneous sorting and layering due to water or lava flow.
Which view (law of superposition or spontaneous sorting and layering) do you think science has been able to observe?
@Freethinkin14 "DArwinian Evolution is and has been known for a while now to be the biggest JOKE among real scientists... Sorry to burst your bubble....."
Gee, that would be news to both the scientific community and the American judicial system. You are a fountain of ignorance to make such a statement.
And for your information, my bubble was burst 30 years ago when I realized that creationism was scientifically, as well as morally, bankrupt, as I am a former creationist.
@ApOMaleficus The Bible describes the construction of the Ark in a very detailed way, Including all measurements.... like cubits and so on..... its pretty crazy the depth of detail in the Scriptures
@InternetDarkLord I am not preaching by any means , but the Bible is noticed to be one the most accurate books in History as far as archeology and geographic locations.... not to mention there is evidence of the Ark in Mt. Ararat and the measurements of the structure in Mt. Ararat are I think a half cubit off from what scripture describes the length of the Ark... which is almost a 100% accurate when side by side with the detailed description of its design in Scripture......
@Freethinkin14 Pure nonsense, Read "The Bible Unearthed." The Bible geography and time line is very wrong. Also, no one can prove the ark is there, it was "found" in many places, which one is real and which fake?
Also, many works of fiction have accurate geography.
@Freethinkin14 You seem like a smart guy, can you answer this for me? What did the carnivors eat for 40-days while it was raining? And, what did they do afterwards when they got back onto dry land? I mean, all the animals, except those on the ark, were dead right? So the only thing for them to eat, were the other animal on the ark. Maybe that's what happened to the dinosaurs?
What a waste of time and money, you said: with this project Hong Kong can offer love, care, peace to the world?? what the world needs is that inmediately you should get a "tune-up" for your brain.
The world needs more hospitals, schools, kinders, clinics, labs, food pantries...shelter, clothing..
I am 67 years old and I worked in a radio station writing commercials for 30 years, if this is a "commercial" this video is the worst "commercial" that I have ever seen in my life.
"love, care, peace and family" - how does Noah's Ark promote those lovely values? Gawd killed every living thing except those fortunate few who were on the Ark. But it doesn't matter; it never happened.
@Killer0fTheSun Very STUPID people would take your word to be truth rather than researching for themselves...... The Bible has been proved to be one of the most accurate historic books as far as archeology and geographic locations among many believing and NON- believing SCHOLARS.... so i trust men with credentials and my own research also BEFORE i would ever trust your angry " logic" , you need to know that believing in God is not committing intellectual suicide
@Killer0fTheSun Just the response I expected..... as if caps lock and exclamation marks and angry name calling actually imply you are far more intelligent than anyone else...... Keep researching bud and desire TRUTH not Half truths and what people accept to be "liked" . Sorry I offended your conscience
@gnarkillkicksass i agree the in a sense but i also have to say what prevents you from selling your computer, cancelling your internet, and selling your possessions to give the money to charity? Before you point out the spec in someones eye, remove the log from your own.....
guitardavid79. You're assertion about "basic kinds" using bears as an example actually argues in favor of evolution.
The term "basic kind" has no biblical support; Leviticus, in listing all "unclean" birds, uses the same word in referring to every "kind" of raven. Since ravens are closely related to each other, it is obvious that the writers had something more specific in mind than the creationist definition of "kinds".
@SpaceOdyssey56 DArwinian Evolution is and has been known for a while now to be the biggest JOKE among real scientists... Sorry to burst your bubble.....
I'm confused. There are literally 1.4 million recorded species and up to 100 million undescribed. How can that many species possibly fit in an ark even as massive as that? Even at the lowest estimate they would not all fit. Please explain. . .
@missmarie273 Look up the word species and see when that word came about. The Bible says "kind".
For example: black bear, polar bear, grizzly bear, they say you have three species there, but their only one "kind". Only one kind of bear was needed on the ark. After the flood, the bear just varied it's "kind" over thousands of years, now we have different "kinds".
@missmarie273 a cubic feet is a measurement from your elbow to your fingertips. The men in Noah's time were three times the height of man today so a replica of an Ark would be 3 times the size of the replicas made today :)
@TheBieberhole69 Inbreeding is exactly how it all started (from Adam & Eve). But you have to understand that the world was completely different then. Everything gets worse, not better. Sure, inbreeding means destruction now, but it didn't then. People then lived to be around 900 years old, everything was bigger, even the people. After the flood everything went downhill. Ages dropped, sizes of everything shrank. There was probably more oxygen in the air.
@TheBieberhole69 "its easier to sail around the world if theres a map of earth,"
hehe, or just build a homemade boat and forget the map and let the wind take you where it will. I'm sure "there were brave people back then wondering what's on the other side of all that water.
"because it takes much longer to develop into a completely different race"
You've got to be kidding me? We're all humans, we just look different. Thousands of years for that to happen? No problem.
@TheBieberhole69 Are you saying that this earth is still being formed and that life is just beginning?
Look around you, EVERYTHING IS FALLING APART!!! Earth, people, everything, it's all dwindling out of control, we're approaching the end. And actually this is proof that evolution is crazy. Evolution implies that everything gets better. YOUR WITNESSING THE OPPOSITE!!!
@TheBieberhole69 Oh, wait, your assuming that "EVERY" human was wiped out. Noah and his family were saved, therefore every human in the world has Noah as an ancestor, which in turn has Adam & Eve as an ancestor.
Or do you mean, how did everybody in the world come from just Noah and his family?
If you'll remember some months ago in the news (I'm sure you may have heard about it), an Australian teenage girl sailed her sailboat around the world in so many months. You actually believe that people thousands of years ago couldn't have done this same thing. On another note, they have just found evidence that maybe the chinese discovered America long before Columbus.
Noah's ark stands for love, care, peace.....and demographically targeting hapless Christian tourists. I've always thought China should buy the Vatican, dismantle it, and reassemble it on a man made island off Hong Kong. That would be the ultimate tourist trap of all time.
@TheBieberhole69 "if the flood was to wipe out humanity why didnt it take out other civilizations on other continents"
hehe, it did.
"why wasnt there christianity in south america, did everyone who died before the spanish came sent to hell?"
This remark just proves you don't know as much as you think you do. Think about what you just said, your assuming there was Christianity before the flood. Jesus "CHRIST" didn't come along until the New Testament, hence no Christianity in the Old, hehehe.
What a waste of money for a story that's simply false.
450 by 75 by 45 feet? please there are billions of species on this earth. And don't say the water animals don't need to be saved either becvause its just water. Fresh water would be mixed with salt and any organisms there would die and it would be mass extinction of many species. Noah's ark is BS and you know it!
@metalcore211 the world was alot different back before the flood,if you would like to know more about how the earth was before the flood instead of immature name calling then do some research before you just talk off the top of your head,look up chuck missler .anyways God bless
@TheKith88 How long ago was the flood? like 3 or 4 thousand years or something? You should do your research mate because almost everything was the same. There was the Andes, the Alps, the Rockies, the Himalayas. There was every almost volcano we had now, Grimsvotn, Mazama, Etna, Vesuvius, Tambora, Krakatoa, Pelee, Paricutin, St. Helens, Pinatubo, Nevada del Ruiz, the list goes on. I can tell you that over a period of 3,000-4,000 years, the Earth hardly changes. To put in perspective it took
@TheKith88 250 million years from Pangaea to become what we have now. Don't try telling someone like me who actually has a university degree in geography that the world was different. The way we lived was. People didn't have science to draw rational conclusions like we do now. Thats why I don't understand how you believe these bronze age myths. It's time to do some research and rationalizing. Good day.
@metalcore211 You honestly believe in the pangea theory? That's only possible if the world is billions of years old, which it isn't. Look at those pangea maps very carefully and you will notice something, Mexico is nowhere to be found and Africa has been shrunk to fit on the map. No doubt the plates are moving a little, but they didn't move that much, not with the earth being just thousands of years old.
Hate to say it, but your degree is nothing but a false indoctrination. Some of it anyway.
@guitardavid79 I'm calling troll on this. I don't know how anyone could be so misinformed. The Earth is 4.54 billion years old and you're WRONG if you think otherwise. Pangaea isn't real? have you ever studied how our plates moved and the shape of our continent. I'm sorry but your a buffoon is you think that evolution is wrong, the world is in fact not 4.54 billion years old or you think that Pangaea is false . Do some reseach you closed minded christian
@metalcore211 hehehehehe, go ahead, pull the "troll" card, people always do when they realize they've been beat.
Oh, by the way, I like the way you think you can narrow the age down to 4.54, hehe. It's like you flipped the earth over and read the bottom and it said, "Come out of nowhere, 4.54 billion years ago".
HAH!!! you poor atheists, you try to come up with your own religion but instead put your foot in your mouths with errors and contradictions.
@guitardavid79 Has to be a troll. It's impossible to be as dumb as you.
So lets go in to the basics. We use a system called radiometric dating which us a technique we use to date materials such as rocks, Usually based on a comparison between the observed abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope and its decay products, using known decay rates. Science is right, your wrong.
I guess you kinda could call it that. I look at science because it investigates, not follow a stupid book
@metalcore211 Radiometric dating? Ok, I'm gonna make this one backfire on you from your own people (leading authorities in the field).
Robert E. Lee, Anthropological Journal of Canada, V.9, N.3
"The troubles of the radiometric dating method are undeniably deep and serious. Despite 35 years of technological refinement and better understanding, the underlying assumptions have been strongly challenged...It should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected.
Henry Paul, (Ages of Rocks, Planets & Stars) p. vi
"Two important assumptions are implicit in this equation: First, we are dealing with a closed system. Second, no atoms of the daughter were present in the system when it formed. These assumptions furnish the most serious limitations on the accumulation clock. Rigorously closed systems probably do not exist in nature, but surprisingly, many minerals and rocks satisfy the requirement well enough to be useful for...
@metalcore211 ...nuclear age determination. The problem is one of judicious geologic selection.
Another:
R.L. Mauger, East Carolina University (Contributions to Geology) V.15 (1):17
"In general, dates in the 'correct ballpark' are assumed to be correct and are published, but those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor or the discrepancies fully explained."
Roger Lewin, Ed. Research News, Science (Bones of Contention) p.194
"The calculated age was quickly refined to be 2.61+ 0.26 million years, which, to anthropologists unfamiliar with the procedures of radiometric dating, has a ring of comforting precision about it. ...41 seperate age determinations which varied between 223 million and 0.91 million years after the first determination the never again obtained 2.61 from their experiments.
@metalcore211 This happens to be standard procedure, although they never get the same results. Remember, these quotes are from the leading authorities in the field. Which, I'm sure you'll find something wrong with them.
@metalcore211 go ahead, call it, you've got nothing else to stand on.
"have you ever studied how our plates moved and the shape of our continent."
See, that's just it, you've studied the wrong thing. I have studied how the plates moved, but I guarantee you that you and I have studied two different things. Mine makes more sense however.
I'm sorry but the burden of being "close minded" falls on you friend, not me. You fail to realize that there just might be another explanation for everything.
@guitardavid79 So I've studied in science and you've studied a false book, written by bronze age dicks who just wanted a way of control or had no other explanation for our existence?
Were in 2011. Science prevails and the bible is nothing but pseudo-mythology. Any intelligent person would dismiss anything it says in the bible with (I would hope common sense but not in your case) the study of science. Time to start living in the real world and not a dream world.
@guitardavid79 Your the one that's saying you study the bible and not science. You sir, are being the ignorant one. I have studied in University about the Earth, you haven't. I'll say too, I have read the new and old testament, multiple times. Every time I laugh harder and harder at these silly stories that you believe over science like talking snakes, floods above mountains, living in a "big fish" for 3 days, among others.
I'll say one more thing, thanks whoever wrote it for making me laugh!
@metalcore211 You've read the Bible multiple times? And then you say you don't know who wrote it?
Wow, looks like we've gotten to the bottom of this. You just think you can argue over something you know nothing about. But, I guess I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, if you have really read it, then you just weren't paying attention to what you were reading.
So, did I catch you in a lie? Or do you have trouble paying attention to what your reading? So much for that degree huh.
@metalcore211 I never said I study the Bible and not science. I merely said that we were studying two different things, your the one who assumed I meant the Bible instead of science. Science and the Bible go hand in hand with each other and that is a fact. And of course I study the Bible and anything else that I may be interested in.
So when it comes to studying evidence of the Bible, I'll study anything the evidence requires me to study. Because my main interest is in the Bible.
@guitardavid79 Science = looking for evidence and facts, studying things to get a better understanding and make rational decisions on the origins of everything.
Bible = Myth, false stories, believing without evidence, exc,exc.
The bible and science fall nowhere near hand in hand. They are opposites. One searches for truth, one requires believing in something ridiculous with absolutely no evidence. Faith is believing what you want to be real and that's it.
@dchains would you like me to present to you thorough evidence to not only disprove your pitiful and uneducated attempts at disproving Jesus? Not only any argument you could present I disprove but I will also disprove to you the argument I presented to you.. (im helping you because I feel bad you accuse me w/o actual knowledge of the topic) :) I would love sharing the truth with you my friend. you are young.. let me help change your future
@dchains so glad you call Jesus Christ a "myth".. it shows me how irrelevant and weak your argument really is. In fact you have no argument. What you should do is go about pointing out that The Bible bar none has more forgeries against it then any other book on the planet and that it would be very improbable to believe its a "whole truth". There is NO denying that Jesus walked, performed miracles and was crucified. That is the most wrote about event in history.
@globalchaos1984 farthest thing from ignorant my friend :) as a matter of fact when I decided to stop believing nothing like the atheist I was I did extensive research on every religion and science and everything I studied pointed to Jesus Im sorry you have been exposed to the "followers" of christ who have lead you astray.. who have misrepresented the Lords truth. Just because you dont believe doesn't mean it is any less true Im glad you question! nothing worse then mindless followers :)
@MrJohnnytsunami If everything you studied and researched ''pointed to Jesus'', then you definitely weren't researching correctly. There is no evidence for your bronze age myths, im sorry, and i hope you find the real truth some day. ;)
They found the ark carbon dated to the exact time published in the Bible, in the exact location it was said to be in. But your one of those atheists who believes that it takes intelligent design to create a fork.. Yet the human body and the earth in all of its complexity are random acts of spontaneous generation. there is NO such thing as a true blue atheist in science fields. They all say the same thing There MUST be a creator. The only existing atheists are guys hiding behind youtube accounts
You have it the wrong way around, "they" didn't find an Ark in the resting place mentioned in the Bible. "They", being cranks not archaeologists went to Araratt and where so desperate to find evidense that they falsified it. If the Bible haf said the Ark landed in Capetown the nutters would claim Table Mountain was a ship.
you guys act like there are 120 million elephants going on the boat.. insects make up over 75% of the species in the world. im a christian and I fully agree with evolution.. considering this was over 4k years ago I would assume there has been a dramatic increase in the species count. as of right now there is enough evidence to prove the ark existed to someone who wanted to believe *faith* but there isnt for the ignorant one track minded atheists. atheists dont exist in the science field.
@MrJohnnytsunami lol there is NO evidence that proves the ark existed. But If you want to believe that a 500 yr old man walked across the globe gathering 2 of every species, carnivores and herbivores, loaded them up in a massive ship and had enough food to feed them for 40 days. (granted there was no bloodbath between the predators and prey) Than you are out of touch with reality.
@globalchaos1984They found the ark carbon dated to the exact time published in the Bible, in the exact location it was said to be in. But your one of those atheists who believes that it takes intelligent design to create a fork.. Yet the human body and the earth in all of its complexity are random acts of spontaneous generation. there is NO such thing as a true blue atheist in science fields. They all say the same thing There MUST be a creator. The only existing atheists are the uneducated
@globalchaos1984 ill guarantee you it took more intelligence to create a boat over 500+ feet long, 80+feet wide and 50+ feet tall that could float and withstand the type of storm Noah was facing. (which has been scientifically proven do your research) Im sure organizing the animals into factions would be the easy part.. And you act like he is feeding them to fatten each animal.. Im sure it wasn't the all you can eat inside of the Peppermill.. lol
If this is a full size replica I propose a challange for Bibilical literalists.
First get 2 of every land and fresh water dwelling animal on the planet and try and get them in this "Ark". Once you have done that close the door and keep them all alive for a month.
You don't even have to cast off (i.e. immediately sink). Just keep every single species on board alive.
@ma049 Sure. Noah had 120 years to build the Ark and assemble the animals. How long are you prepared to wait for someone to do it? Let's be reasonable... let's say 50 years?! Next... I will glady take on your challenge if you will kindly PAY for the purchase, collection and feed for the animals. I will take care of the animals' maintenance... etc.
@ma049 God created the earth and the universe,use your brain a little,im sure those animals that he created ,he would also be able to keep them alive.And its kinds of animals and you dont need any type of water kinds for obvious reasons,they still swim dont they.anyways god bless !
I already wen't and stayed there.. From all the things
On Ground floor they have 2 souvenir shops
On first floor they have restaurant
2nd Floor restaurant
3rd floor they got the hotel
The hotel is nice up and down bed.. Completely if your a family visiting its a good place.. but Kinda abit of a high price.. because the tour's inside Noah's Ark is really nice
The ticket is only valid for 1 day I guess. A family room is 4 up and down beds, and 2 beds
@uncleady1 Noah had 120 years to build it, with the help of his family. The animals came to him. He brought a fewextra animals for sacrifice. Maybe they had baby t-rexes? Maybe most of the animals were put in hibernation. My question is, why didn't Noah swat those two mosquitos?!
1.8 million known species X2 ...lots of mouths to feed and arses to wipe !!
an elephant eats approx 136kg of food a day over a month thats about 4 tonne a month 8 T for the pair...they drifted for 5 months so 40 tonne of food just for the elephants...that just leaves food for the other 3.6 million animals to store !!!
@OmfgItsHenu not if they were eggs or baby's,i dont thing noah would have taken the biggest animals of each kind,you get the eggs and baby for so many reasons ,not just baby's for space,but food consumption,and longer live spans to have more children,more then enough room,
And this has 2 of every species of land animal (plus more examples of the 'clean' ones), and food and water for a year, and bedding. How much space does each animal get. How do they handle creatures like big cats, rhinos, venemous snakes. How do they feed the carnivores?
The guy says *love, care, peace and family* with absolutely no idea what he's saying. He hasn't read the bible either. Wonder what he'd say when he finds out what happens to all the babies, children, adults and life forms NOT within that ark.
Not sure if you are kidding or not, but I am pretty sure that is two two-humpers that just happened to line up in the shot. It does look like one three-humped camel though.
They did the smart thing by going with fake animals at this attraction. No food, no poop, no worries. :)
@Achilles11Spear THAT'S WHAT I SAID yet THEY KILL DOGS AND CATS EVERY DAY WITH SUCH CRUELTY WHAT THEY HELL THEY KNOW ABOUT GODS ANIMALS and LOVE PEACE etc.. pfffff
@prettychachi so true I FIGHT THAT EVERYDAY on FACE BOOK im an ANIMAL ACTIVIST AND I KNOW FOR SURE THESE PEOPLE ALSO EAT HUMAN BABY'S IN A SOUP these people are the DEVILS KIDS !!!
Hey religious freaks, are you embarrassed for believing this bullshit? There is no god, satan, an ark or anything else that was written in some old book. And if your a suicide bomber thinking your going to heaven then WTF are you on about? living in heaven with a heap of virgins (probably piglets) when you are missing most of your body parts and looking like a pile of shit covered in blood wont get ya no pussy. You all need some serious help, you have been brainwashed..snap out of it
But you're missing the biggest point of all, not 2 of every animal in the world could fit in that thing. Seriously.. Does anyone fathom how many species there are in the world?
@SinHarvester well, i supose they could have evolved right i mean dont we see evolution evey fucking day. why just yesterday my cat gave birth to a creature that looked more like a turtle.
This is beyond retard. The work and thinking of a fringe mentality. That hulk obviously couldn't exist and this facimile proves it.
bryanttillman 1 month ago
Continued... There may have been a 'moon pool' built into the lower deck, which would force constant air exchange through the window around the top of the Ark (ventilation), the Ark wasn't built to 'cruise', it just floated; no propulsion or navigation system was needed. Only about 21,000 animals were on the Ark... two of each 'kind' of unclean, and seven of each clean 'kind' ('species' is just a man-made system of classification).
RBNightlinger 1 month ago
@RBNightlinger Absolutely NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of that.
Have you heard of inbreeding?
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
Scoffers are truly hilarious with their snarky attitudes and haughty, condescending questions. It's clear they have no intention of considering any answers a believer offers. But, just in case... God sent young animals to Noah, not full grown ones; they entered the Ark and went into a hibernation state, so they required little food or water and did not eliminate huge amounts of excreta. Water wasn't stored inside the Ark, but there was most likely a cistern of sorts built into the roof.
RBNightlinger 1 month ago
@RBNightlinger Absolutely NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE of your claims.
Scoffers means people who think for themselves.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
thats cool
thebenfroats 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Noah's Arc was a lot smaller and actualy held the DNA of every creature and not the creature it self, I can't believe people are still worshiping this... Look at the ancient text all over the world... When people first started to wright they wrote down their history and actual events...
So ask your self this, What god needs a Vehicle to fly???
A Circle within a Circle sounds like Technology to me.
A bit of topic but I don't care, The bibal is a Fabricated truth of alien encounters.
Aliens!
XerxiesLv426 1 month ago
mate noah was carrying the food in the ark, heaps of meat!!!!kill the cows, theres heaps of animals in the ark, dont u think!!!!!
36amrbm1619 1 month ago
Erm...surely someone asked this already, but what did the carnivores eat for 40-days while it was raining? And, what did they do after wards when they got back onto dry-land? I mean, all the animals, except those on the ark, were dead right? So the only thing for them to eat, were the other animal on the ark. Maybe that's what happened to the dinosaurs?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969 The carnivors ate meat, additional animals were taken onboard the ark as food surplus to be slaughtered as and when required for carnivores. When the animals came out of the ark those same animals that were slaughtered for food were also bread for the sole purpose of repopulating the land and providing food for carnivores when released.
MrMaxTruth 1 month ago
@MrMaxTruth I see. Which bit of the bible explains that bit? Was this ark built before or after the pyramids?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969 Noah knew there would be a period of time after he came off the Ark where there would be little food. Most people would have the intelligence to think a little further than the next 40 days ahead and prepare for it. Its common sence !
MrMaxTruth 1 month ago
@blueray1969
If I gave you two rabbits, how long do you think it would be before you had twenty?
Now do this with rats, gophers, koalas, opossums, squirrels, weasels, and many other animals, add to this the fact that the Ark actually had spare room for mass food and water storage. It truly was not an issue.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah I imagine, even if the herbivores were able to breed on board, it would be several months before there were 20 rabbits. But tell me, what did the carnivores eat while they were working for the bunny rabbits to breed? You see, even if the lions, tigers, cheetahs, tasmanian devils, snakes etc etc etc only had one rabbit between all of them...no more bunny rabbits. the boat would have to be huge and would have to contain many many "food herbivores".
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
As I said before, there was ample room for food and water storage.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah clearly...otherwise the bible wouldn't make any sense would it...
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Do you think me mistaken?
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah mistaken? don't know. I'm still trying to find the bit in the bible where it tells us about the breading etc.
blueray1969 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah and I was just wondering where they found the polar bears, rattlesnakes and koalas from. Or did they all evolve from the bears that Noah saved?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Your on the right track, but you must first toss aside the teachings of evolution. Of bear kind (Genus level) only one male and female needed to come aboard. All other species of Genus Ursus (that are truly bear species) could then come about again through the process of natural selection and adaptation, note this is not macro evolution, but micro, which is adaptation. Also we are talking sky and land animals here, not sea.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah i see. so how long ago was the ark and just wondered, how did the polar bear get to the north pole and the koalas get to australia...did Noah give them a lift?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Somewhere over 4000 years ago.
As for the polar bear and the koala, how did they get there according to evolution?
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah Over hundreds of thousands of years, evolved from other animals. They weren't picked up and then dropped off after a 40-day boating trip. Was the a serious question? How can you compare the two lol.
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
You can't compare the two as far as time, :) but even evolution will not deny that a polar bear and a black bear come from the same past, Time has always been the magic bullet of evolution. coal, oil, diamonds, all took millions of years, but that two has been proven false. Most can be done in days.
Two bears got off the ark, they multiplied, they spread out as the population grew. as they moved out into other climates, they adapted.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah somewhere over 4,000 years ago you said. Australia was still Australia 4,000 years ago. It has been an island separated from the European/Asian and American land-masses for millions of years. So when Noah dropped off his 2 bears, how did they multiply AND manage to get to the other side of the earth? Or maybe when you say "more than 4,000 years ago" you mean "many millions of years ago"? How long for a bear to swim from Israel to Australia?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah You know, the ark sounds like a rubbish story that is so full of holes, if it was a ship, it would sink.
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
No, we're not talking story's full of holes here, if so , we would be talking about something like Lucy, we both know that if she had feet they would be able to pick up fruit, :), Yet we also know that human footprints were found in the very rock they used to date her, could it be a dating problem, hmmmm.
As for the flood, tell me, , what type of stones are fossils found in and why?
How long would it take for 3 men and 3 women to populate a planet the size of earth?
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Also a side note, they were on the ark for just over a year.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah Ah...so that explains it. The Ark had a year's worth of herbivores to feed the carnivores (although I read somewhere they only had 7 of each). That's a lot of vegetation they had to have in storage...not sure how you keep insects alive with rice/wheat grains, and then Noah sailed round the earth dropping off the relevant species on the correct islands?
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Who said he had to worry about insects? You try so hard to discredit scripture, if you would put half the enthusiasm into questioning Evolution, you would have turned from that long ago.
Did you figure out what rock you find fossils in and why?
Or how long it would take six people to populate an earth size plaint?
A new one, why are the oldest trees on earth only slightly older then 4000 years?
Why are human footprints found in rock that dates way older then humans?
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blueray1969
Why are there flood stories would wide?
Why is there modern seashells found on the highest peeks?
Why is helium still trapped in the granite crust?
How can a fossil form though millions of years of earth layers?
Why do we find every lifeform's fossil that is found, within the cretaceous period?
Why have we never witnessed micro evolution?
Looking at the odds of a new species arising, how then do you get two of the same that can reproduce?
We could go on all day.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@HawleyluYah Many many people have questioned evolution. That is why it passed the test and became a theory...from empirical testing. There are sea shells up mountains because mountains are formed from new eruptions, pushing the landmass up. You can read that on wiki. I question scripture which is clearly nonsense and full of holes.
blueray1969 1 month ago
@blueray1969
Can you point to some empirical testing of micro evolution?
Yes, the theory is that before any land, there were modern seashells, but is it fact?
First off, it's not just shells, there have been whale fossils found inland, in and up to 500ft. above sea level.
It also would rely on sediment layers being a time record, that the law of superposition is valid, which it is not
There is more to factor in, but I am heading out, I will continue later.
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@blueray1969
You see, you look at shells on a mountain top and say see the land came up out of the water, I look and say that supports a flood that even the highest peek was covered in a cataclysmic disaster.
In your religion, you expect to find the law of superposition, in mine, I expect to find spontaneous sorting and layering due to water or lava flow.
Which view (law of superposition or spontaneous sorting and layering) do you think science has been able to observe?
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
Comment removed
HawleyluYah 1 month ago
@Freethinkin14 "DArwinian Evolution is and has been known for a while now to be the biggest JOKE among real scientists... Sorry to burst your bubble....."
Gee, that would be news to both the scientific community and the American judicial system. You are a fountain of ignorance to make such a statement.
And for your information, my bubble was burst 30 years ago when I realized that creationism was scientifically, as well as morally, bankrupt, as I am a former creationist.
SpaceOdyssey56 1 month ago
there nothing china wont replicate
keltecdan 2 months ago 2
How do you replicate something described in a book?
ApOMaleficus 2 months ago
@ApOMaleficus The Bible describes the construction of the Ark in a very detailed way, Including all measurements.... like cubits and so on..... its pretty crazy the depth of detail in the Scriptures
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
Comment removed
lovingthetruth7 1 month ago
@Freethinkin14 Hey there friend, I sent you a message that I hope and believe will help you. Check your inbox, and God Bless.
lovingthetruth7 1 month ago
You can't replicate nonexistent objects. Next, Hong Kong will replicate the Mad Hatter's Tea Party in Wonderland.
InternetDarkLord 3 months ago
@InternetDarkLord I am not preaching by any means , but the Bible is noticed to be one the most accurate books in History as far as archeology and geographic locations.... not to mention there is evidence of the Ark in Mt. Ararat and the measurements of the structure in Mt. Ararat are I think a half cubit off from what scripture describes the length of the Ark... which is almost a 100% accurate when side by side with the detailed description of its design in Scripture......
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
@Freethinkin14 Pure nonsense, Read "The Bible Unearthed." The Bible geography and time line is very wrong. Also, no one can prove the ark is there, it was "found" in many places, which one is real and which fake?
Also, many works of fiction have accurate geography.
InternetDarkLord 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Freethinkin14 You seem like a smart guy, can you answer this for me? What did the carnivors eat for 40-days while it was raining? And, what did they do afterwards when they got back onto dry land? I mean, all the animals, except those on the ark, were dead right? So the only thing for them to eat, were the other animal on the ark. Maybe that's what happened to the dinosaurs?
blueray1969 1 month ago
What a waste of time and money, you said: with this project Hong Kong can offer love, care, peace to the world?? what the world needs is that inmediately you should get a "tune-up" for your brain.
The world needs more hospitals, schools, kinders, clinics, labs, food pantries...shelter, clothing..
I am 67 years old and I worked in a radio station writing commercials for 30 years, if this is a "commercial" this video is the worst "commercial" that I have ever seen in my life.
GET A NEW BRAIN.
tumamacantaybaila 3 months ago
@tumamacantaybaila - Come now sir- it's used by schools to educate their children. Besides, we're Hong Kong, we can afford it.
cityboy605 2 months ago
"love, care, peace and family" - how does Noah's Ark promote those lovely values? Gawd killed every living thing except those fortunate few who were on the Ark. But it doesn't matter; it never happened.
schabetc 4 months ago 2
Very stupid people willl believe in a story like Noah...
Killer0fTheSun 4 months ago
@Killer0fTheSun Very STUPID people would take your word to be truth rather than researching for themselves...... The Bible has been proved to be one of the most accurate historic books as far as archeology and geographic locations among many believing and NON- believing SCHOLARS.... so i trust men with credentials and my own research also BEFORE i would ever trust your angry " logic" , you need to know that believing in God is not committing intellectual suicide
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
@Freethinkin14
HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a retard like you would defend a work of mythology!!!! Just remember....your a retard.
Killer0fTheSun 1 month ago
@Killer0fTheSun Just the response I expected..... as if caps lock and exclamation marks and angry name calling actually imply you are far more intelligent than anyone else...... Keep researching bud and desire TRUTH not Half truths and what people accept to be "liked" . Sorry I offended your conscience
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
@Freethinkin14
Look everyone hes STILL defending mythology!! HHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
You fucking christians.....all of you....retards!!
Killer0fTheSun 1 month ago
@Killer0fTheSun not just the christians, muslims and jews too.
blueray1969 1 month ago
Should have spent the money on charity and the materials into housing the homeless, not feeding a bronze age bullshit fairy tale.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago 2
@gnarkillkicksass i agree the in a sense but i also have to say what prevents you from selling your computer, cancelling your internet, and selling your possessions to give the money to charity? Before you point out the spec in someones eye, remove the log from your own.....
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
LOL, "it a stand for love, peace, and family."
Let's not forget that it stands for mass genocide.
BTW, why did animals from the americas swim the atlantic and meet up with noah to avoid drowning in the flood? The swam, so they wouldn't drown??
theodorichen 6 months ago
Thats awesome!
Vinc3ntPh4m 6 months ago
guitardavid79. You're assertion about "basic kinds" using bears as an example actually argues in favor of evolution.
The term "basic kind" has no biblical support; Leviticus, in listing all "unclean" birds, uses the same word in referring to every "kind" of raven. Since ravens are closely related to each other, it is obvious that the writers had something more specific in mind than the creationist definition of "kinds".
SpaceOdyssey56 7 months ago 2
@SpaceOdyssey56 DArwinian Evolution is and has been known for a while now to be the biggest JOKE among real scientists... Sorry to burst your bubble.....
Freethinkin14 1 month ago
LoudCryProphecied. Humans of 4500 years ago were about the same size as today. Where is the evidence to back up your assertion?
SpaceOdyssey56 7 months ago
Wow. It looks amazing.
brightmasihministry 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All these people who say Noah's Ark is here or there are WRONG. I found the true location and none of them are even close. Check out my videos.
downyourtube 8 months ago
im loosin wood!!!!
foortiz619 8 months ago
Wow!!
breezwonder 8 months ago
the dutchmans replica is more how the arc looked according to the bible...check it out on yahoo
daprophetess 8 months ago
I'm confused. There are literally 1.4 million recorded species and up to 100 million undescribed. How can that many species possibly fit in an ark even as massive as that? Even at the lowest estimate they would not all fit. Please explain. . .
missmarie273 8 months ago
@missmarie273 Look up the word species and see when that word came about. The Bible says "kind".
For example: black bear, polar bear, grizzly bear, they say you have three species there, but their only one "kind". Only one kind of bear was needed on the ark. After the flood, the bear just varied it's "kind" over thousands of years, now we have different "kinds".
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@missmarie273 a cubic feet is a measurement from your elbow to your fingertips. The men in Noah's time were three times the height of man today so a replica of an Ark would be 3 times the size of the replicas made today :)
LoudCryProphecies 8 months ago
@LoudCryProphecies HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! 3 times the height! That's rich. Now, back to finger painting...
theodorichen 6 months ago
@theodorichen You were entertained lol
LoudCryProphecies 6 months ago
@missmarie273
hey there. This is obviously not exhaustive, but this video should help explain things: /watch?v=kz-W6nsBJPQ&feature=feedf
Grambo4 7 months ago
Noah's Ark is physically impossible.
dogsiter4567 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 Yeah, of course it does, if you believe it takes the evolutionary process to do it.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 Inbreeding is exactly how it all started (from Adam & Eve). But you have to understand that the world was completely different then. Everything gets worse, not better. Sure, inbreeding means destruction now, but it didn't then. People then lived to be around 900 years old, everything was bigger, even the people. After the flood everything went downhill. Ages dropped, sizes of everything shrank. There was probably more oxygen in the air.
Look up, hyperbaric chamber, pihranas.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 "its easier to sail around the world if theres a map of earth,"
hehe, or just build a homemade boat and forget the map and let the wind take you where it will. I'm sure "there were brave people back then wondering what's on the other side of all that water.
"because it takes much longer to develop into a completely different race"
You've got to be kidding me? We're all humans, we just look different. Thousands of years for that to happen? No problem.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 Are you saying that this earth is still being formed and that life is just beginning?
Look around you, EVERYTHING IS FALLING APART!!! Earth, people, everything, it's all dwindling out of control, we're approaching the end. And actually this is proof that evolution is crazy. Evolution implies that everything gets better. YOUR WITNESSING THE OPPOSITE!!!
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 Oh, wait, your assuming that "EVERY" human was wiped out. Noah and his family were saved, therefore every human in the world has Noah as an ancestor, which in turn has Adam & Eve as an ancestor.
Or do you mean, how did everybody in the world come from just Noah and his family?
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 "how did humans come back to those area"
If you'll remember some months ago in the news (I'm sure you may have heard about it), an Australian teenage girl sailed her sailboat around the world in so many months. You actually believe that people thousands of years ago couldn't have done this same thing. On another note, they have just found evidence that maybe the chinese discovered America long before Columbus.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
Noah's ark stands for love, care, peace.....and demographically targeting hapless Christian tourists. I've always thought China should buy the Vatican, dismantle it, and reassemble it on a man made island off Hong Kong. That would be the ultimate tourist trap of all time.
muttonbuster 8 months ago
Wow that's awesome!
elphiascutie3 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 "if the flood was to wipe out humanity why didnt it take out other civilizations on other continents"
hehe, it did.
"why wasnt there christianity in south america, did everyone who died before the spanish came sent to hell?"
This remark just proves you don't know as much as you think you do. Think about what you just said, your assuming there was Christianity before the flood. Jesus "CHRIST" didn't come along until the New Testament, hence no Christianity in the Old, hehehe.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@TheBieberhole69 "its impossible for a planet to be thousands of years old"
Prove it's not.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
What a waste of money for a story that's simply false.
450 by 75 by 45 feet? please there are billions of species on this earth. And don't say the water animals don't need to be saved either becvause its just water. Fresh water would be mixed with salt and any organisms there would die and it would be mass extinction of many species. Noah's ark is BS and you know it!
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 the world was alot different back before the flood,if you would like to know more about how the earth was before the flood instead of immature name calling then do some research before you just talk off the top of your head,look up chuck missler .anyways God bless
TheKith88 8 months ago
@TheKith88 How long ago was the flood? like 3 or 4 thousand years or something? You should do your research mate because almost everything was the same. There was the Andes, the Alps, the Rockies, the Himalayas. There was every almost volcano we had now, Grimsvotn, Mazama, Etna, Vesuvius, Tambora, Krakatoa, Pelee, Paricutin, St. Helens, Pinatubo, Nevada del Ruiz, the list goes on. I can tell you that over a period of 3,000-4,000 years, the Earth hardly changes. To put in perspective it took
metalcore211 8 months ago
@TheKith88 250 million years from Pangaea to become what we have now. Don't try telling someone like me who actually has a university degree in geography that the world was different. The way we lived was. People didn't have science to draw rational conclusions like we do now. Thats why I don't understand how you believe these bronze age myths. It's time to do some research and rationalizing. Good day.
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 You honestly believe in the pangea theory? That's only possible if the world is billions of years old, which it isn't. Look at those pangea maps very carefully and you will notice something, Mexico is nowhere to be found and Africa has been shrunk to fit on the map. No doubt the plates are moving a little, but they didn't move that much, not with the earth being just thousands of years old.
Hate to say it, but your degree is nothing but a false indoctrination. Some of it anyway.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 I'm calling troll on this. I don't know how anyone could be so misinformed. The Earth is 4.54 billion years old and you're WRONG if you think otherwise. Pangaea isn't real? have you ever studied how our plates moved and the shape of our continent. I'm sorry but your a buffoon is you think that evolution is wrong, the world is in fact not 4.54 billion years old or you think that Pangaea is false . Do some reseach you closed minded christian
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 hehehehehe, go ahead, pull the "troll" card, people always do when they realize they've been beat.
Oh, by the way, I like the way you think you can narrow the age down to 4.54, hehe. It's like you flipped the earth over and read the bottom and it said, "Come out of nowhere, 4.54 billion years ago".
HAH!!! you poor atheists, you try to come up with your own religion but instead put your foot in your mouths with errors and contradictions.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 Has to be a troll. It's impossible to be as dumb as you.
So lets go in to the basics. We use a system called radiometric dating which us a technique we use to date materials such as rocks, Usually based on a comparison between the observed abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope and its decay products, using known decay rates. Science is right, your wrong.
I guess you kinda could call it that. I look at science because it investigates, not follow a stupid book
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 Radiometric dating? Ok, I'm gonna make this one backfire on you from your own people (leading authorities in the field).
Robert E. Lee, Anthropological Journal of Canada, V.9, N.3
"The troubles of the radiometric dating method are undeniably deep and serious. Despite 35 years of technological refinement and better understanding, the underlying assumptions have been strongly challenged...It should be no surprise, then, that fully half of the dates are rejected.
continued --->
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211
Henry Paul, (Ages of Rocks, Planets & Stars) p. vi
"Two important assumptions are implicit in this equation: First, we are dealing with a closed system. Second, no atoms of the daughter were present in the system when it formed. These assumptions furnish the most serious limitations on the accumulation clock. Rigorously closed systems probably do not exist in nature, but surprisingly, many minerals and rocks satisfy the requirement well enough to be useful for...
continued ---->
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 ...nuclear age determination. The problem is one of judicious geologic selection.
Another:
R.L. Mauger, East Carolina University (Contributions to Geology) V.15 (1):17
"In general, dates in the 'correct ballpark' are assumed to be correct and are published, but those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor or the discrepancies fully explained."
continued ---->
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 How about another?
Roger Lewin, Ed. Research News, Science (Bones of Contention) p.194
"The calculated age was quickly refined to be 2.61+ 0.26 million years, which, to anthropologists unfamiliar with the procedures of radiometric dating, has a ring of comforting precision about it. ...41 seperate age determinations which varied between 223 million and 0.91 million years after the first determination the never again obtained 2.61 from their experiments.
continued ----->
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 This happens to be standard procedure, although they never get the same results. Remember, these quotes are from the leading authorities in the field. Which, I'm sure you'll find something wrong with them.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 go ahead, call it, you've got nothing else to stand on.
"have you ever studied how our plates moved and the shape of our continent."
See, that's just it, you've studied the wrong thing. I have studied how the plates moved, but I guarantee you that you and I have studied two different things. Mine makes more sense however.
I'm sorry but the burden of being "close minded" falls on you friend, not me. You fail to realize that there just might be another explanation for everything.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 So I've studied in science and you've studied a false book, written by bronze age dicks who just wanted a way of control or had no other explanation for our existence?
Were in 2011. Science prevails and the bible is nothing but pseudo-mythology. Any intelligent person would dismiss anything it says in the bible with (I would hope common sense but not in your case) the study of science. Time to start living in the real world and not a dream world.
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 Yep, science proves it. Your just walking in your own ignorance.
But, your more than welcome to believe what you want, but the time will come when you will see. Then it will be too late.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 Your the one that's saying you study the bible and not science. You sir, are being the ignorant one. I have studied in University about the Earth, you haven't. I'll say too, I have read the new and old testament, multiple times. Every time I laugh harder and harder at these silly stories that you believe over science like talking snakes, floods above mountains, living in a "big fish" for 3 days, among others.
I'll say one more thing, thanks whoever wrote it for making me laugh!
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 You've read the Bible multiple times? And then you say you don't know who wrote it?
Wow, looks like we've gotten to the bottom of this. You just think you can argue over something you know nothing about. But, I guess I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one, if you have really read it, then you just weren't paying attention to what you were reading.
So, did I catch you in a lie? Or do you have trouble paying attention to what your reading? So much for that degree huh.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 I never said I study the Bible and not science. I merely said that we were studying two different things, your the one who assumed I meant the Bible instead of science. Science and the Bible go hand in hand with each other and that is a fact. And of course I study the Bible and anything else that I may be interested in.
So when it comes to studying evidence of the Bible, I'll study anything the evidence requires me to study. Because my main interest is in the Bible.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 Science = looking for evidence and facts, studying things to get a better understanding and make rational decisions on the origins of everything.
Bible = Myth, false stories, believing without evidence, exc,exc.
The bible and science fall nowhere near hand in hand. They are opposites. One searches for truth, one requires believing in something ridiculous with absolutely no evidence. Faith is believing what you want to be real and that's it.
metalcore211 8 months ago
@metalcore211 It also means "OBSERVABLE", which evolution is not.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@metalcore211 Agreed, I bet most of these fool's have never heard of carbon dating!
pettyofficer30 8 months ago
@pettyofficer30 C14 dating is unstable, the results is ridiculous.
If you don't realize that, then I guess that makes you a fool.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
yet another way to seperate the masses from their money all in the name of god...
people are so stupid
ace1sod 9 months ago
!!! GEEZUS !!! that would sink as soon as it touched the water
hallowedgravy 9 months ago
Now, let's see it float.
thisisaguy 9 months ago
@dchains I see you "like" jack vale :) i do too
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@dchains would you like me to present to you thorough evidence to not only disprove your pitiful and uneducated attempts at disproving Jesus? Not only any argument you could present I disprove but I will also disprove to you the argument I presented to you.. (im helping you because I feel bad you accuse me w/o actual knowledge of the topic) :) I would love sharing the truth with you my friend. you are young.. let me help change your future
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@dchains so glad you call Jesus Christ a "myth".. it shows me how irrelevant and weak your argument really is. In fact you have no argument. What you should do is go about pointing out that The Bible bar none has more forgeries against it then any other book on the planet and that it would be very improbable to believe its a "whole truth". There is NO denying that Jesus walked, performed miracles and was crucified. That is the most wrote about event in history.
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@globalchaos1984 farthest thing from ignorant my friend :) as a matter of fact when I decided to stop believing nothing like the atheist I was I did extensive research on every religion and science and everything I studied pointed to Jesus Im sorry you have been exposed to the "followers" of christ who have lead you astray.. who have misrepresented the Lords truth. Just because you dont believe doesn't mean it is any less true Im glad you question! nothing worse then mindless followers :)
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@MrJohnnytsunami If everything you studied and researched ''pointed to Jesus'', then you definitely weren't researching correctly. There is no evidence for your bronze age myths, im sorry, and i hope you find the real truth some day. ;)
dchains 10 months ago
They found the ark carbon dated to the exact time published in the Bible, in the exact location it was said to be in. But your one of those atheists who believes that it takes intelligent design to create a fork.. Yet the human body and the earth in all of its complexity are random acts of spontaneous generation. there is NO such thing as a true blue atheist in science fields. They all say the same thing There MUST be a creator. The only existing atheists are guys hiding behind youtube accounts
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@MrJohnnytsunami "The only existing atheists are guys hiding behind youtube accounts"
...can you get any more ignorant?
globalchaos1984 10 months ago
You have it the wrong way around, "they" didn't find an Ark in the resting place mentioned in the Bible. "They", being cranks not archaeologists went to Araratt and where so desperate to find evidense that they falsified it. If the Bible haf said the Ark landed in Capetown the nutters would claim Table Mountain was a ship.
ma049 9 months ago
you guys act like there are 120 million elephants going on the boat.. insects make up over 75% of the species in the world. im a christian and I fully agree with evolution.. considering this was over 4k years ago I would assume there has been a dramatic increase in the species count. as of right now there is enough evidence to prove the ark existed to someone who wanted to believe *faith* but there isnt for the ignorant one track minded atheists. atheists dont exist in the science field.
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@MrJohnnytsunami lol there is NO evidence that proves the ark existed. But If you want to believe that a 500 yr old man walked across the globe gathering 2 of every species, carnivores and herbivores, loaded them up in a massive ship and had enough food to feed them for 40 days. (granted there was no bloodbath between the predators and prey) Than you are out of touch with reality.
globalchaos1984 10 months ago
@globalchaos1984They found the ark carbon dated to the exact time published in the Bible, in the exact location it was said to be in. But your one of those atheists who believes that it takes intelligent design to create a fork.. Yet the human body and the earth in all of its complexity are random acts of spontaneous generation. there is NO such thing as a true blue atheist in science fields. They all say the same thing There MUST be a creator. The only existing atheists are the uneducated
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
@globalchaos1984 ill guarantee you it took more intelligence to create a boat over 500+ feet long, 80+feet wide and 50+ feet tall that could float and withstand the type of storm Noah was facing. (which has been scientifically proven do your research) Im sure organizing the animals into factions would be the easy part.. And you act like he is feeding them to fatten each animal.. Im sure it wasn't the all you can eat inside of the Peppermill.. lol
MrJohnnytsunami 10 months ago
Noah's Ark was 45-55 feet tall. 450-550 feet long. Pretty large boat.
Nashhinton 10 months ago
i guarantee if a flood happens in hong kong, everyone is gonna be in that thing
aznxblaz3 10 months ago
"Let's be reasonable... "
Not practical, huh? What you are really seem to be saying to me is that you feel the exercise is logistally impossible.
Which was my point.
You seem to be a litteralist in every sense of the word.
ma049 11 months ago
See the TRUTH about Noah's Ark!
watch?v=qZgbcuS25YI
Gaz6231 11 months ago
Cool.
If this is a full size replica I propose a challange for Bibilical literalists.
First get 2 of every land and fresh water dwelling animal on the planet and try and get them in this "Ark". Once you have done that close the door and keep them all alive for a month.
You don't even have to cast off (i.e. immediately sink). Just keep every single species on board alive.
Any takers?
ma049 11 months ago
@ma049 you're an animal. hope there's not two of you.
kellydjelly 11 months ago
@ma049 Sure. Noah had 120 years to build the Ark and assemble the animals. How long are you prepared to wait for someone to do it? Let's be reasonable... let's say 50 years?! Next... I will glady take on your challenge if you will kindly PAY for the purchase, collection and feed for the animals. I will take care of the animals' maintenance... etc.
Countrygent100 11 months ago
@ma049 God created the earth and the universe,use your brain a little,im sure those animals that he created ,he would also be able to keep them alive.And its kinds of animals and you dont need any type of water kinds for obvious reasons,they still swim dont they.anyways god bless !
TheKith88 9 months ago
@TheKith88 Your batshit crazy. Maybe you should use your brain because it doesn't appear you are.
metalcore211 8 months ago
Somewhere to go on a rainy day I suppose!
JimTLonW6 1 year ago
@1983rosej
Pumunta na kme dyan
Ok guys..
I already wen't and stayed there.. From all the things
On Ground floor they have 2 souvenir shops
On first floor they have restaurant
2nd Floor restaurant
3rd floor they got the hotel
The hotel is nice up and down bed.. Completely if your a family visiting its a good place.. but Kinda abit of a high price.. because the tour's inside Noah's Ark is really nice
The ticket is only valid for 1 day I guess. A family room is 4 up and down beds, and 2 beds
Zeignn 1 year ago
dapat made in japan,kc fake pag made in china......joke
1983rosej 1 year ago
Not replica, u cant make a replica of something that never existed
qazzzie 1 year ago 2
@uncleady1 Noah had 120 years to build it, with the help of his family. The animals came to him. He brought a fewextra animals for sacrifice. Maybe they had baby t-rexes? Maybe most of the animals were put in hibernation. My question is, why didn't Noah swat those two mosquitos?!
Perktube1 1 year ago
lets see them replicate feeding the hungry instead of building fucking boats
deewoken1 1 year ago
1.8 million known species X2 ...lots of mouths to feed and arses to wipe !!
an elephant eats approx 136kg of food a day over a month thats about 4 tonne a month 8 T for the pair...they drifted for 5 months so 40 tonne of food just for the elephants...that just leaves food for the other 3.6 million animals to store !!!
WILFUCKHAM 1 year ago
@WILFUCKHAM "1.8 million known species X2 "
you prob mean 40-100million species X2. thats the estimated amount :)
OmfgItsHenu 1 year ago
@OmfgItsHenu actually the bible says kinds not species and there are under 1000 kinds of animals ,minus the ocean kinds makes it under 800.God bless!
TheKith88 9 months ago
@TheKith88 you realize that even 800 x2 animals would be impossible, right?
OmfgItsHenu 9 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu not if they were eggs or baby's,i dont thing noah would have taken the biggest animals of each kind,you get the eggs and baby for so many reasons ,not just baby's for space,but food consumption,and longer live spans to have more children,more then enough room,
TheKith88 8 months ago
@TheKith88 ok well, lets assume that those 800 x2 animal eggs would fit into one boat (some animals dont lay eggs)
and lets assume that those 800 kinds of animals became 40-100million in few thousand years.
its not like thats the only problem with the story.
-he would have also had to take fish eggs, and a ton of water. the water would have become toxic, and fishes need water change very often
-atmosphere (duh)
-food/water for 40 days would still be a huge problem
OmfgItsHenu 8 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu No need to worry about fish. THIS WAS A FLOOD THAT CONSIST OF WATER!!!
You find it hard to believe that variations of animals can come about in thousands of years?
What about the atmosphere? You assume the world "then" was the same as "now"?
Why would food and water be a problem? Can you imagine the size of the ark and also the time Noah had to make arrangements?
If you will truly put the pencil to it, you will see that it was all very possible.
guitardavid79 8 months ago
@guitardavid79 " No need to worry about fish. THIS WAS A FLOOD THAT CONSIST OF WATER!!!"
durr. the water would have became so toxic not one fish could have survived in it.
"You find it hard to believe that variations of animals can come about in thousands of years?"
from 800 to 40,000,000 in few thousands of years? no, seems possible.
"Why would food and water be a problem"
fresh water, thousands of tons, and food would be thousands of tons also.
would need a boat the size of Belgia.
OmfgItsHenu 8 months ago
And this has 2 of every species of land animal (plus more examples of the 'clean' ones), and food and water for a year, and bedding. How much space does each animal get. How do they handle creatures like big cats, rhinos, venemous snakes. How do they feed the carnivores?
JimTLonW6 1 year ago
The guy says *love, care, peace and family* with absolutely no idea what he's saying. He hasn't read the bible either. Wonder what he'd say when he finds out what happens to all the babies, children, adults and life forms NOT within that ark.
trent8002003 1 year ago
WoW..china makes everything nowadays, even Noah"s Ark..LOL
What don't they make eh?
igorg003 1 year ago
Comment removed
igorg003 1 year ago
anybody notice the three hump camel
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast
Not sure if you are kidding or not, but I am pretty sure that is two two-humpers that just happened to line up in the shot. It does look like one three-humped camel though.
They did the smart thing by going with fake animals at this attraction. No food, no poop, no worries. :)
Caniswalensis 1 year ago
noah arks >>>made in china
Achilles11Spear 1 year ago 19
@Achilles11Spear THAT'S WHAT I SAID yet THEY KILL DOGS AND CATS EVERY DAY WITH SUCH CRUELTY WHAT THEY HELL THEY KNOW ABOUT GODS ANIMALS and LOVE PEACE etc.. pfffff
prettychachi 1 year ago
@prettychachi i hear that in thailand they are starting to eat aportion now .(babys) SON A BICTHHHH ,,,,,,,
Achilles11Spear 1 year ago
@Achilles11Spear YES ITS TRUE I HAVE THE STORY ON IT.. i seen the PICS TOO NASTY ASS EVIL PEOPLE MAN ....
prettychachi 1 year ago
@prettychachi so true I FIGHT THAT EVERYDAY on FACE BOOK im an ANIMAL ACTIVIST AND I KNOW FOR SURE THESE PEOPLE ALSO EAT HUMAN BABY'S IN A SOUP these people are the DEVILS KIDS !!!
prettychachi 1 year ago
@Achilles11Spear and its probly full of lead LOL
brucekirk89 11 months ago
@Achilles11Spear LOL
jumpa01 8 months ago
many other species went two by two but all the gay ones died out.
datzfast 1 year ago
Hey religious freaks, are you embarrassed for believing this bullshit? There is no god, satan, an ark or anything else that was written in some old book. And if your a suicide bomber thinking your going to heaven then WTF are you on about? living in heaven with a heap of virgins (probably piglets) when you are missing most of your body parts and looking like a pile of shit covered in blood wont get ya no pussy. You all need some serious help, you have been brainwashed..snap out of it
5Fathom5 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@5Fathom5 jesus loves you!
777jeremeah 1 year ago
@5Fathom5 God is real
AnnOyIngMeOraNge 1 year ago
But you're missing the biggest point of all, not 2 of every animal in the world could fit in that thing. Seriously.. Does anyone fathom how many species there are in the world?
SinHarvester 1 year ago
@SinHarvester well, i supose they could have evolved right i mean dont we see evolution evey fucking day. why just yesterday my cat gave birth to a creature that looked more like a turtle.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast Sure evolution happens everyday However the type of evolution you're talking about takes millions of years.