You should post another video and call it "re: existance of god proof for dummies" and word it in a way that will be a little easier to follow and grasp.
God made our universe at a certain point in time, but God has always existed in another dimension not subject to our measurememnt of time. Eternal means always existing and always will exist. That may be hard to comprehend but so is any theory brought up by atheists.
"God made our universe at a certain point in time, but God has always existed in another dimension not subject to our measurememnt of time."
this is merely how a potentially existent god is defined..just because we define a potentially existent god, doesn't mean it exists..as of now, god is an abstract, imaginative, creation of the mind..so, you're making a blind assertion by proclaiming that which defines him, as an actual truth of reality..
as of now, the only thing we know exists, is nature. and nature isn't proof, or even evidence of a god..it's only proof/evidence of nature..more than likely, nature is eternal, or universes originate from nothingness via quantum fluxuations..it's still a mystery. but, so is the existence of god. so, why would u use one mystery to explain another mystery?
@itzahazylife nature's complexity and attention to detail is proof of superior intelligence that created it all. It all boils down to the fact that life is complex, the earth is complex, and the universe is complex and generally orderly. Perfection with such precision doesn't just happen. You evolutionists need more than "time" to make your flimsy theory work.
this argument has already been dismantled..complexity isn't automatic proof of intelligence..complexity can also be proof that origins are extremely simple, and thru billions of years, become complex. and this is what the evidence supports, which is why most scientists adhere to this..the further back we look, the more simple things become..and no, we don't need more than time..we have enough time..we have billions of years..
@itzahazylife Complexity greatly reduces the odds of something happening by chance. If you have three car parts and put them in a box and shake it and then open the box there is a slim chance they might all fall together as they fit together. Make it 1,000 parts and the odds are unlikely.
and i know u guys like to say that the 4 universal laws are signs of god, since a slight change in either, would be disasterous for our universe,but do u ever ask yourself if this is the only universe?..if this is one universe among countless others, isn't it inevitable that one would be just right?..in the same way, earth was inevitable out of countless other types of planets?
If "Life directed by an evolutionary current" is what we mean by "order",
**
Yes! What in the world do these fundie evangelicals mean when they use this word "order"? Do they even know what they are trying to say? I have my doubts.
**
Chaos [theory] dictates that not just likely, but inevitable existence of occasional order will appear alongside a vast majority of disorder.
**
Astonishingly true. How does the energy even dissipate in the first place without doing _something_?
without such affirming commentary so illustrative of real understanding of the piece's content, i would certainly have no reason to continue on with my work as jayme ryan on channel isismelting.
A lot of words and "wordiness" but no substances. Then again "substance" would be a noun-concept. It really comes down to this: Is infinite regression possible by any means if in fact there is a begininng? and if there isnt any beginning, explain approximate causes to the beginning & how we would number present-day causes/concepts?
Speaking about anything else doesnt even matter if we skip over this one. When you're through with that we can talk about zero volume & infinite density
interesting what you said about god. having many shapes and many points of view, imaginable, unimaginable until occurrence. If God were to have many points of view, do you think God exists in all directions and times, just as space expands and looks the same in every direction of the universe?
furthermore, god should be synonymous with something like "everything that exists" - then "universe" is "everything that exists" as well - so then "god" is "universe" - that is, everything exists, otherwise it is not part of everything.
this is all very simple stuff really, and it might be a pity to accept the complications imposed upon us by those who support the various churches by being their allies or opposition.
Your presentation is so "filled with absence" as to make it come out too fast and is therefore very difficult to follow.
If you slow it down and pretend you are talking to an elementary school audience you'll reach a bigger audience on Youtube.
I'm not trying condescend. I just want to know what you are saying. If you are going to read from notes on wordpad or whatever, please slow it down and explain each point more clearly before moving on...if you want...thanks.
i am reading notes from notepad++, a free open-source text-editor for windows, not wordpad; if your desire is to point out that i'm using notes, your aggression should be more passive.
if i wanted to reach a bigger audience, i would not speak about things that are way too complex to understand for elementary-schoolers & people who think my works are to be grasped in one round.
if you've a specific question after watching this carefully prepared work 9 more times, please do not hesitate to ask.
Great video, but he's right... squeeze a few more milliseconds of silence in there occasionally, and be a bit more aware of an overall contour to your voice inflection. No need to simplify your content
i welcome your constructive criticisms and thank each of you kindly for your interest in my work's improvement; i will carefully consider your comments before and while preparing my next piece.
You should post another video and call it "re: existance of god proof for dummies" and word it in a way that will be a little easier to follow and grasp.
sariglenn 9 months ago
@sariglenn i think you're being facetious, but i just might take the suggestion literally & to heart regardless; to the #isismelting igloo!
isismelting 8 months ago
its just words, also created by man
PrisonerofDemocracy 1 year ago
@PrisonerofDemocracy that reduces all down to nothing obviously.
isismelting 1 year ago
Comment removed
britishempires 1 year ago
God made our universe at a certain point in time, but God has always existed in another dimension not subject to our measurememnt of time. Eternal means always existing and always will exist. That may be hard to comprehend but so is any theory brought up by atheists.
NewDirection4us 1 year ago
@NewDirection4us
"God made our universe at a certain point in time, but God has always existed in another dimension not subject to our measurememnt of time."
this is merely how a potentially existent god is defined..just because we define a potentially existent god, doesn't mean it exists..as of now, god is an abstract, imaginative, creation of the mind..so, you're making a blind assertion by proclaiming that which defines him, as an actual truth of reality..
itzahazylife 1 year ago
@NewDirection4us
as of now, the only thing we know exists, is nature. and nature isn't proof, or even evidence of a god..it's only proof/evidence of nature..more than likely, nature is eternal, or universes originate from nothingness via quantum fluxuations..it's still a mystery. but, so is the existence of god. so, why would u use one mystery to explain another mystery?
itzahazylife 1 year ago
@itzahazylife nature's complexity and attention to detail is proof of superior intelligence that created it all. It all boils down to the fact that life is complex, the earth is complex, and the universe is complex and generally orderly. Perfection with such precision doesn't just happen. You evolutionists need more than "time" to make your flimsy theory work.
NewDirection4us 1 year ago
@NewDirection4us
this argument has already been dismantled..complexity isn't automatic proof of intelligence..complexity can also be proof that origins are extremely simple, and thru billions of years, become complex. and this is what the evidence supports, which is why most scientists adhere to this..the further back we look, the more simple things become..and no, we don't need more than time..we have enough time..we have billions of years..
itzahazylife 1 year ago
@itzahazylife Complexity greatly reduces the odds of something happening by chance. If you have three car parts and put them in a box and shake it and then open the box there is a slim chance they might all fall together as they fit together. Make it 1,000 parts and the odds are unlikely.
NewDirection4us 1 year ago
@NewDirection4us
and i know u guys like to say that the 4 universal laws are signs of god, since a slight change in either, would be disasterous for our universe,but do u ever ask yourself if this is the only universe?..if this is one universe among countless others, isn't it inevitable that one would be just right?..in the same way, earth was inevitable out of countless other types of planets?
itzahazylife 1 year ago
I'm lost at "the eve of the big bang." How can there be an eve to the big bang if there is no time before it?
AWorldExposure 1 year ago
i spy siracha
avivavivamia 2 years ago
You make so much sense.
How old are you?
5 stars/sub'd
crunkman407 2 years ago
i have 24 years, friend, i'm glad to see that you seem to like some of my work!
isismelting 2 years ago
**
If "Life directed by an evolutionary current" is what we mean by "order",
**
Yes! What in the world do these fundie evangelicals mean when they use this word "order"? Do they even know what they are trying to say? I have my doubts.
**
Chaos [theory] dictates that not just likely, but inevitable existence of occasional order will appear alongside a vast majority of disorder.
**
Astonishingly true. How does the energy even dissipate in the first place without doing _something_?
otonanoC 2 years ago
**
Perhaps the biggest Black Swan conceivable would be the existence of a universe.
**
Exquisite.
I had to take a long walk in the woods alone to think about this.
otonanoC 2 years ago
i thank you both for watching & listening.
& i thank you again for responding.
without such affirming commentary so illustrative of real understanding of the piece's content, i would certainly have no reason to continue on with my work as jayme ryan on channel isismelting.
isismelting 2 years ago
5 stars
deomartinez77 2 years ago
i appreciate both the rating and the comment along with the sentiment.
isismelting 2 years ago
A lot of words and "wordiness" but no substances. Then again "substance" would be a noun-concept. It really comes down to this: Is infinite regression possible by any means if in fact there is a begininng? and if there isnt any beginning, explain approximate causes to the beginning & how we would number present-day causes/concepts?
Speaking about anything else doesnt even matter if we skip over this one. When you're through with that we can talk about zero volume & infinite density
biblehelp 2 years ago
i've read your comment over & over, mr. or mz. biblehelp, & that about which you're talking has not yet become clear.
isismelting 1 year ago
Universe as a verb-- how about cosmogenesis?
0ThouArtThat0 2 years ago
forgive me if i've missed a subtle point here, but cosmogenesis seems to be a noun, and a neologism as well.
isismelting 2 years ago
interesting what you said about god. having many shapes and many points of view, imaginable, unimaginable until occurrence. If God were to have many points of view, do you think God exists in all directions and times, just as space expands and looks the same in every direction of the universe?
HaleyMary 2 years ago
yes;
furthermore, god should be synonymous with something like "everything that exists" - then "universe" is "everything that exists" as well - so then "god" is "universe" - that is, everything exists, otherwise it is not part of everything.
this is all very simple stuff really, and it might be a pity to accept the complications imposed upon us by those who support the various churches by being their allies or opposition.
isismelting 2 years ago
Your presentation is so "filled with absence" as to make it come out too fast and is therefore very difficult to follow.
If you slow it down and pretend you are talking to an elementary school audience you'll reach a bigger audience on Youtube.
I'm not trying condescend. I just want to know what you are saying. If you are going to read from notes on wordpad or whatever, please slow it down and explain each point more clearly before moving on...if you want...thanks.
Cashify 2 years ago
i am reading notes from notepad++, a free open-source text-editor for windows, not wordpad; if your desire is to point out that i'm using notes, your aggression should be more passive.
if i wanted to reach a bigger audience, i would not speak about things that are way too complex to understand for elementary-schoolers & people who think my works are to be grasped in one round.
if you've a specific question after watching this carefully prepared work 9 more times, please do not hesitate to ask.
isismelting 2 years ago
Great video, but he's right... squeeze a few more milliseconds of silence in there occasionally, and be a bit more aware of an overall contour to your voice inflection. No need to simplify your content
PatrickBurns 2 years ago
i welcome your constructive criticisms and thank each of you kindly for your interest in my work's improvement; i will carefully consider your comments before and while preparing my next piece.
isismelting 2 years ago