@triggerhappy1988- wow dude you're an idiot. The planes of WWII have NOTHING to do with drag racing a half a century later. BTW if you're talking about the speed of the A6M, it blew ours to pieces, was 5x more agile too. The problem was too little armor, but it had heavy ass guns, was light as a feather and faster than a hummingbird on crack. Pilots were very good too. But again, planes aren't cars...so shut it dumbass.
i almost didnt buy my 3g eclipse gt cuz the 1g & 2g suck so bad. i loved them back in the 90's but u get 90k miles on a gsx or gst and seems like nothing but problems. my gt will run 15.6 all day stock and is at 146k and still going strong. not super fast but.sure u see a gst or gsx run a good time at the track like 1 out of 1000 cars. but the none turbos..slow. love the sound of a blow off valve but i love the growl of my v6 more. or come drive my wifes 2011 gt. will change ur mind real fast
@xmodrock inaccurate. its not a 200HP motor. its 260HP stock and with intake, headers and exhaust its pushing 300 to 310 to the wheels. i have a 07 eclipse gt and im pushin 310 to the wheels and dont have any problems with cobra's here. just sayin
@silverclipse86 yea but to the wheels its *about* 200 if its an auto.. and i was going by google.. they say it has 210HP to the wheels :-/ but if anyone craps on american muscle i just pull out the A/C cobra X-D
Mitsubishi in WWII: Shot down in WWII by the F6F, F4F, F4U and even P-38, P-40, P-39, and P-51. Mitsubishi today: Shot down at the track by the Mustang, Camaro, and even challenger. Mitsubishi: target practice since 1940 xD
@triggerhappy1988 to bad ur wrong as fuck xD ive seen more videos of shity as gay ricer hondas beat mustangs camaros and challengers than ive seen mitsubishis losing them, and thats fucking sad
Mitsubishi in WWII: Shot down in WWII by the F6F, F4F, F4U and even P-38, P-40, P-39, and P-51. Mitsubishi today: Shot down at the track by the Mustang, Camaro, and even challenger. Mitsubishi: target practice since 1940 xD
@triggerhappy1988 not trying to start a fight but i can almost garentee a twin turbo evo would kill a rustange camero and a challenger the guy in the eclipse was a complete idiot probably mostly stock with the some money and time that eclipse could of killed that car
@1brannon10 hey look at the EVO and try to say that again... if you do you are realy ignorant and don't know anything. oh and didn't you noticed how the eclipse at least apeared stock including the exhaust even and that looked like a heavy modded mustang.. i think it deserves alil respect for not being an insane amount behind it. seeing how it clearly wasn't stock to stock....... rednecks I swear they never learn.
@RsBl0gger91 Actually i have a 2001 Eclipse GT V6, 0-60 in 7.2 sec. Before that i had a 2006 Mustang V6, 0=60 in 6.9. The Stang was slow compared to my Eclipse. But yes a Mustang GT totally different class. Gotta love the Stand GT's!
............for you sayin duh it lost its a 4cly n such really dont know shit about cars fuck engine size isnt everything ya know many 4 cyl cars can beat the big v8s and vise versa ever heard of power to weight ratio but seriously read a book or 2 before talking like and idiot again please
The 4th gen Eclipses have more power than any other, they're the only generation of stock Eclipses that can do 0-60 in well below 6 seconds. As you can tell by the exhaust, that was the 4 cyl Eclipse.
stang put that piece of scrap metal down , they look ok and I do love the eclipse but not the new ones they suck hell my rs can fuckin stay next to em all I can beat im sure if I really try stang is whats up
Actually, a stock Eclipse GT with the 3.8 Mivec V6 runs a faster 1/4 than the 5.0 Mustang GT from that gen. The average quarter mile for that generation Mustang runs around 15.6 seconds compared to the Eclipses peppy 14.3.
Oh yeah, you must not have checked the exhaust, but the Eclipse in this video is the 4 cyl trim. How pathetic that the 5.0 Mustang could hardly beat the 2.4 liter 162 horsepower Eclipse.
@spudnspud More wiki facts I see...I've seen Notches go 14.8 with the shitty stock 2.73s, but you wouldnt know anything about that, you're to busy playing xbox and video games. Get off of Forza and turn some wrenches. And nobody is saying a stock 5.0 was fast, becuase they're not. But did it win? Yup. Is that what counts in a drag race? Yup. End of story.
No shit it won, it raced against a fucking 2.4 you dumbass.
All's I'm saying is that if it was 3.8 V6, the Eclipse probably wouldn't have had any trouble blowing the doors off that stang. 14.8 or not, that isn't as peppy as the GT's.
@spudnspud I love it when people like to benchmark their cars against a car that's 20+ years old and using 30+ years old tech at the time. Looks like at the end of the day Mustang wins no matter how you look at it. And just a side note, everyone in the tuner community knows that Eclipses of ANY gen can't take mods worth shit. Non responsive, no ability to maintain any amount of F/I etc etc. Crap. You can make a 5.0 run 12's WITHOUT touching the engine. Gears, slicks, headers, cai, tune hello 12s
@408Mustangs Funny, How a simple bolt on for the forth gen eclipse gives it 500HP. Supercharged bolt on from ripp mods. stage 2. Oh, and thats not reducing weight, or exhaust, or clutch. Just a bolt on.
i dont understand the people who says that the mustang suck when every video on youtube says mustang killer cause u think ur awesome because ur car can beat mustang beast thats like ALLELLUYAHH!! when someone beats a stang ajajaj go cry in your moms minivan when i laugh at ya fucking ricers!!!
good one 1991 talon. mustang mustve been drunk or something. my 01 gt beats the 263 hp 3.8 L 24-valve 07. the eclipse has such a shitty power curve and torque rating. only thing it has going is a little less weight. bunch of retards on here.2-3 car lengths <--- =lmao/lie
Oh God. People think Mustangs and Eclipsi (Yes, Eclipsi, sounds more intelligent than eclipses) are in total competition. Why in hell would a person in their right mind with a 4 banger or a V6 in an eclipse race a mustang with a V8.
ive seen a stock 2008 eclipse gtp beat a stock 2007 mustang gt on the 1/4 mile.... could have been drivers but the eclipse beat him by 2-3 car lengths so.....
Yea so you're a fag, the new mustangs (with a good driver) run 13..5 in the quarter, whereas as your shit ass eclipse (with a good driver, which I doubt you are), runs a 14.4. I'm sorry you confuse v6 mustangs for gts you ricer piece of shit. Come race my 85 5.0
too many dicks on youtube think the run of the mill stock V6 Stang is all there is out there..My friend Chirs Torres (see his videos here on youtube) has a turbo 3.8 pulling 385 hp on a stock bottom end. Run into him on the street and youre smoked! Mustangs do not suck, cheap buy-in and with a few grand of mods even a V6 is something to deal with, plus junkyard parts are everywhere, Lincoln, Mercury, F150's and Vans..anything will go in one! a good V6 with a GT rear end even makes a difference.
Stfu, your Mustang is more foreign than you'd like to admit, less of its made in America than you'd like to tell yourself, but I'll go ahead and let you think that they're made in America, it'll help you sleep at night I suppose.
@ConstrictedTruth You think i've never heard of foreign labor? Who the fuck cares which 3rd world country manufactures our cars? It doesnt make them any less american. Its not like they have any control over the design of the car. They just connect Part A to Part B
What about in my 3000GT VR4? Twin Turbo charged DOHC with AWD. Not very many American V8's can hang with me. Shit, I've even raced a few SVT Cobra's in my day and none of them could quite stay even my VR4's 13.3 quarter mile time.
@spudnspud - Egh, that comment was so old i dont even remember who i was talking to. Most likely somebody with a honda or something. VR4's, G35's, and most nissan V6's are on a different level than most other japanese V6's.
A friend of mine has a stock VR4. Its a nice car, real quick and handles great. His dad's bolt on camaro ss beats it in the 1/4 every time. I wouldnt really ever use mustangs as the american icon car. Everything between 2005-2010 is just terribly designed
@PowerOfSti How are they shit? Because they dont have AWD? Get an evo. The New Eclipse is better than the old Eclipse in every way. None the less you can BOLT on 500HP on the new one and call it quits. Like i said, want AWD, get an evo.
@Cloudstrife1188 ... Eclipse GSX is LIKE and Evo :) ..same EVOIII engine... you can bolt "500whp" to a GSX too with less money ;), 4g's Are pretty heavy and Still Fwd , Doesn't matter if it's 700hp .. it will still have no traction comparing with a 1g/2g thus making the 4g a pos on design .. Everyone have their own opinion :D
@PowerOfSti if you never drive a 4g then dont speak. a 4g with intake, headers and exaust can have more than 300hp. what need a 1g and 2g to have 300hp+? even with the stock turbo cant beat a 4g.
@SerialBeaterXXX u said it. that mustang had work done. the 4g gt will run a 14.10 mph with a good driver stock.
silverclipse86 4 months ago
@triggerhappy1988- wow dude you're an idiot. The planes of WWII have NOTHING to do with drag racing a half a century later. BTW if you're talking about the speed of the A6M, it blew ours to pieces, was 5x more agile too. The problem was too little armor, but it had heavy ass guns, was light as a feather and faster than a hummingbird on crack. Pilots were very good too. But again, planes aren't cars...so shut it dumbass.
Nextmillionare27 5 months ago
the blue pixel won :D
derick4767 5 months ago 7
filmed with a calculator
JLchevz 6 months ago
i almost didnt buy my 3g eclipse gt cuz the 1g & 2g suck so bad. i loved them back in the 90's but u get 90k miles on a gsx or gst and seems like nothing but problems. my gt will run 15.6 all day stock and is at 146k and still going strong. not super fast but.sure u see a gst or gsx run a good time at the track like 1 out of 1000 cars. but the none turbos..slow. love the sound of a blow off valve but i love the growl of my v6 more. or come drive my wifes 2011 gt. will change ur mind real fast
DirtRoadDude 6 months ago
@DirtRoadDude ok, ill drive both your cars :D
SuperStankful 4 months ago
DSMs suck cause they got a 200HP engine and weigh more than my cobra with a 330HP engine.. atleast the new DSMs
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock inaccurate. its not a 200HP motor. its 260HP stock and with intake, headers and exhaust its pushing 300 to 310 to the wheels. i have a 07 eclipse gt and im pushin 310 to the wheels and dont have any problems with cobra's here. just sayin
silverclipse86 4 months ago
@silverclipse86 yea but to the wheels its *about* 200 if its an auto.. and i was going by google.. they say it has 210HP to the wheels :-/ but if anyone craps on american muscle i just pull out the A/C cobra X-D
xmodrock 4 months ago
idc the eclipse is a beast my friend could make the eclipse beat a lambo no lie
wwelh4 7 months ago
@wwelh4 doubt that shit, in a 1/4 mile of corse, but there not made to go fast off the start, there made for top speed, dumb ass
BMXeon4life 7 months ago
@wwelh4 a lambo of my choosing?
TheSupraRz 7 months ago
Mitsubishi in WWII: Shot down in WWII by the F6F, F4F, F4U and even P-38, P-40, P-39, and P-51. Mitsubishi today: Shot down at the track by the Mustang, Camaro, and even challenger. Mitsubishi: target practice since 1940 xD
triggerhappy1988 9 months ago
@triggerhappy1988 to bad ur wrong as fuck xD ive seen more videos of shity as gay ricer hondas beat mustangs camaros and challengers than ive seen mitsubishis losing them, and thats fucking sad
BMXeon4life 7 months ago
Mitsubishi in WWII: Shot down in WWII by the F6F, F4F, F4U and even P-38, P-40, P-39, and P-51. Mitsubishi today: Shot down at the track by the Mustang, Camaro, and even challenger. Mitsubishi: target practice since 1940 xD
triggerhappy1988 9 months ago
@triggerhappy1988 not trying to start a fight but i can almost garentee a twin turbo evo would kill a rustange camero and a challenger the guy in the eclipse was a complete idiot probably mostly stock with the some money and time that eclipse could of killed that car
Patrtickgilligan 8 months ago
@Patrtickgilligan a 1 or 2 could, not that abomanation
BMXeon4life 7 months ago
Comment removed
triggerhappy1988 9 months ago
Comment removed
aestheticallyangelic 9 months ago
When will people just finally realize that Mitsubishi makes better TV's than cars?
1brannon10 1 year ago
@1brannon10 hey look at the EVO and try to say that again... if you do you are realy ignorant and don't know anything. oh and didn't you noticed how the eclipse at least apeared stock including the exhaust even and that looked like a heavy modded mustang.. i think it deserves alil respect for not being an insane amount behind it. seeing how it clearly wasn't stock to stock....... rednecks I swear they never learn.
speedfreak127 1 year ago
@speedfreak127 Rednecks... Pahaha dude you're crazy.
1brannon10 1 year ago
@1brannon10 when are people gonna realize fords are using mazda motors even older mustanges :)
Patrtickgilligan 8 months ago
@Patrtickgilligan Ok man. Absolutely.
1brannon10 8 months ago
Stock mustang Vs. stock Eclipse = Eclipse distruction
MyStangGetsAss 1 year ago
haha the eclipse its a piece of shit !!
joshhhh2 1 year ago
@joshhhh2 Mustang is a piece of shit. It obviously wasnt stock. Go back to your farm redneck
Cloudstrife1188 1 year ago
You can't compare eclipse to mustang...two different classes...
RsBl0gger91 1 year ago
@RsBl0gger91 Actually i have a 2001 Eclipse GT V6, 0-60 in 7.2 sec. Before that i had a 2006 Mustang V6, 0=60 in 6.9. The Stang was slow compared to my Eclipse. But yes a Mustang GT totally different class. Gotta love the Stand GT's!
jerm26554 1 year ago
aka lead sledge
jkonn7 1 year ago
............for you sayin duh it lost its a 4cly n such really dont know shit about cars fuck engine size isnt everything ya know many 4 cyl cars can beat the big v8s and vise versa ever heard of power to weight ratio but seriously read a book or 2 before talking like and idiot again please
seth96gt 1 year ago
jajajajajaja muscle cars is the better jaja import cars = little shit.
astroboy5999 1 year ago
@astroboy5999 dont you jaja me astroboy!
FrankAndDaveOutdoors 1 year ago
lol big talk for a car thats moded
JamesBlitz 1 year ago
if it was a 1gen or 2gen DSM with turbo and ok tuner would beat that mustang with no problem
jialunjiao 1 year ago 2
3gen and 4gen eclipse have no power
jialunjiao 1 year ago
@jialunjiao
The 4th gen Eclipses have more power than any other, they're the only generation of stock Eclipses that can do 0-60 in well below 6 seconds. As you can tell by the exhaust, that was the 4 cyl Eclipse.
spudnspud 1 year ago
@spudnspud yep also it doesnt come turbo and it's FWD and it's got a fat ass
jialunjiao 1 year ago
C mon man
Eclipses from 99 down are the shit
the new modles are ugly and have no power
monge1228 1 year ago
stang put that piece of scrap metal down , they look ok and I do love the eclipse but not the new ones they suck hell my rs can fuckin stay next to em all I can beat im sure if I really try stang is whats up
JimmyMcmillan 1 year ago
Wow a suoed up mustang barley beat a stock eclipse im not sayin anything cuz the new eclipses are ugly but wow
tshort4 2 years ago
@ jdblood202
I don't care how fast your 5.0 is. It is possibly the ugliest car ever made
AKHomicide 2 years ago
@AKHomicide Nobody cares about looks when it's time to line up. But I guess you're a ricer, so that's what you're all about, all show and no go.
408Mustangs 1 year ago
@408Mustangs
Actually, a stock Eclipse GT with the 3.8 Mivec V6 runs a faster 1/4 than the 5.0 Mustang GT from that gen. The average quarter mile for that generation Mustang runs around 15.6 seconds compared to the Eclipses peppy 14.3.
Oh yeah, you must not have checked the exhaust, but the Eclipse in this video is the 4 cyl trim. How pathetic that the 5.0 Mustang could hardly beat the 2.4 liter 162 horsepower Eclipse.
spudnspud 1 year ago
@spudnspud More wiki facts I see...I've seen Notches go 14.8 with the shitty stock 2.73s, but you wouldnt know anything about that, you're to busy playing xbox and video games. Get off of Forza and turn some wrenches. And nobody is saying a stock 5.0 was fast, becuase they're not. But did it win? Yup. Is that what counts in a drag race? Yup. End of story.
408Mustangs 1 year ago
@408Mustangs
No shit it won, it raced against a fucking 2.4 you dumbass.
All's I'm saying is that if it was 3.8 V6, the Eclipse probably wouldn't have had any trouble blowing the doors off that stang. 14.8 or not, that isn't as peppy as the GT's.
spudnspud 1 year ago
@spudnspud I love it when people like to benchmark their cars against a car that's 20+ years old and using 30+ years old tech at the time. Looks like at the end of the day Mustang wins no matter how you look at it. And just a side note, everyone in the tuner community knows that Eclipses of ANY gen can't take mods worth shit. Non responsive, no ability to maintain any amount of F/I etc etc. Crap. You can make a 5.0 run 12's WITHOUT touching the engine. Gears, slicks, headers, cai, tune hello 12s
408Mustangs 1 year ago
@408Mustangs Funny, How a simple bolt on for the forth gen eclipse gives it 500HP. Supercharged bolt on from ripp mods. stage 2. Oh, and thats not reducing weight, or exhaust, or clutch. Just a bolt on.
Cloudstrife1188 1 year ago
i dont understand the people who says that the mustang suck when every video on youtube says mustang killer cause u think ur awesome because ur car can beat mustang beast thats like ALLELLUYAHH!! when someone beats a stang ajajaj go cry in your moms minivan when i laugh at ya fucking ricers!!!
johnnykillswitch 2 years ago
What?
Cloudstrife1188 2 years ago
fuck
voltiger19 2 years ago
good one 1991 talon. mustang mustve been drunk or something. my 01 gt beats the 263 hp 3.8 L 24-valve 07. the eclipse has such a shitty power curve and torque rating. only thing it has going is a little less weight. bunch of retards on here.2-3 car lengths <--- =lmao/lie
Sforschondetta 2 years ago
v8 es poder
loko727 2 years ago
Oh God. People think Mustangs and Eclipsi (Yes, Eclipsi, sounds more intelligent than eclipses) are in total competition. Why in hell would a person in their right mind with a 4 banger or a V6 in an eclipse race a mustang with a V8.
-.-
WillKicklx 3 years ago
ive seen a stock 2008 eclipse gtp beat a stock 2007 mustang gt on the 1/4 mile.... could have been drivers but the eclipse beat him by 2-3 car lengths so.....
1991TalonTSI 2 years ago
any car can beat a mustang.
gr8oli 2 years ago
obvious noob with 20,000 under the hood
but if you put 20 on the stang is going to kill everything!!
johnnykillswitch 2 years ago 2
LOL what a hater.
blown06tc 2 years ago
dah drivers, no stock eclipse gt could beat a stang gt
johnnykillswitch 2 years ago
@johnnykillswitch only if its a first or second gen eclipse gst or gsx itll whomp on a mustang but the 3rd and 4th gen eclipses are just trash
TekOne510 2 years ago
@johnnykillswitch
1/4's for both vehicles:
1993 Mustang GT 5.0L V8 = 15.6 seconds
2000 Eclipse GT 3.0L V6 = 15.1 seconds
2006 Eclipse GT 3.8L V6 = 14.3 seconds
All stock.
spudnspud 1 year ago
I can race Mustang V8 GT no mods with my Eclipse GT V6, cause Mustang GT is joke. I am comparing stock vs stock
freak77power 2 years ago
Yea so you're a fag, the new mustangs (with a good driver) run 13..5 in the quarter, whereas as your shit ass eclipse (with a good driver, which I doubt you are), runs a 14.4. I'm sorry you confuse v6 mustangs for gts you ricer piece of shit. Come race my 85 5.0
jdblood202 2 years ago
too many dicks on youtube think the run of the mill stock V6 Stang is all there is out there..My friend Chirs Torres (see his videos here on youtube) has a turbo 3.8 pulling 385 hp on a stock bottom end. Run into him on the street and youre smoked! Mustangs do not suck, cheap buy-in and with a few grand of mods even a V6 is something to deal with, plus junkyard parts are everywhere, Lincoln, Mercury, F150's and Vans..anything will go in one! a good V6 with a GT rear end even makes a difference.
Gloomshadow1 2 years ago
@jdblood202
Ricer? My 1997 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 runs about a 13.3.
Not talking shit about the new mustangs lol, but I wouldn't diss so called Ricers when certain imports can blow the doors off any stock Mustang GT.
spudnspud 1 year ago
You can race, but your japanese v6 is truthfully no match for an american V8. Just saying.
BlueFlame1365 2 years ago
Stfu, your Mustang is more foreign than you'd like to admit, less of its made in America than you'd like to tell yourself, but I'll go ahead and let you think that they're made in America, it'll help you sleep at night I suppose.
ConstrictedTruth 1 year ago
@ConstrictedTruth You think i've never heard of foreign labor? Who the fuck cares which 3rd world country manufactures our cars? It doesnt make them any less american. Its not like they have any control over the design of the car. They just connect Part A to Part B
BlueFlame1365 1 year ago 2
@BlueFlame1365
What about in my 3000GT VR4? Twin Turbo charged DOHC with AWD. Not very many American V8's can hang with me. Shit, I've even raced a few SVT Cobra's in my day and none of them could quite stay even my VR4's 13.3 quarter mile time.
spudnspud 1 year ago
@spudnspud - Egh, that comment was so old i dont even remember who i was talking to. Most likely somebody with a honda or something. VR4's, G35's, and most nissan V6's are on a different level than most other japanese V6's.
A friend of mine has a stock VR4. Its a nice car, real quick and handles great. His dad's bolt on camaro ss beats it in the 1/4 every time. I wouldnt really ever use mustangs as the american icon car. Everything between 2005-2010 is just terribly designed
BlueFlame1365 1 year ago
new eclipses ain't shit 1g is where it's at
bustahh1 3 years ago
lol americas #1 ricer mobile!
redrosecross 3 years ago
1G and 2G DSM's were aswome. Sorry, but new one's are total sh*t
PowerOfSti 2 years ago 20
@PowerOfSti The new Mivec is a beast...the fact that these 2 cars are completely different classes
RsBl0gger91 1 year ago
@PowerOfSti How are they shit? Because they dont have AWD? Get an evo. The New Eclipse is better than the old Eclipse in every way. None the less you can BOLT on 500HP on the new one and call it quits. Like i said, want AWD, get an evo.
Cloudstrife1188 1 year ago
@Cloudstrife1188 ... Eclipse GSX is LIKE and Evo :) ..same EVOIII engine... you can bolt "500whp" to a GSX too with less money ;), 4g's Are pretty heavy and Still Fwd , Doesn't matter if it's 700hp .. it will still have no traction comparing with a 1g/2g thus making the 4g a pos on design .. Everyone have their own opinion :D
merc207 1 year ago
@merc207 on-a-roll-you-have-more-than-enuf-traction-with-fwd-and-700hp..-that-thing-would-be-a-monster-.-it-would-be-a-waste-on-the-drag.-but-there-are-really-fast-7-second-fwd-cars.-who-is-to-say-some-crazy-ass-fanatic-wouldnt-do-that-to-the-eclipse-lol
Cloudstrife1188 1 year ago
@Cloudstrife1188 You have those dashes there cause your space key is broke right?
ultogamma 1 year ago
@PowerOfSti
i have a 3G and i like it, but still i agree with u...
lets hope the new one coming is much more worth buying
postmortemarg 1 year ago
@PowerOfSti if you never drive a 4g then dont speak. a 4g with intake, headers and exaust can have more than 300hp. what need a 1g and 2g to have 300hp+? even with the stock turbo cant beat a 4g.
AxeDK 10 months ago
@AxeDK they need an exhaust, intake, front mount and tune. thats it. i drive a 98 gsx. i would know.
02turbotypeS 7 months ago
@PowerOfSti why? the new ones are packing 250 hp, how are they shit?
TheMiles302 7 months ago
@PowerOfSti this is defiantly a false statement. i hate it when ppl hate on a car because they cant afford it.
silverclipse86 4 months ago
какой то ебаный мустанг
BongoVIP 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NI LA SOMBRA VIO AL MUSTANG SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!
fucking pakki or w.e u are
HardRocker10125 3 years ago
racist piece of shit
ARVNpistola313 3 years ago 9
NI LA SOMBRA LE VIO AL MUSTANG
punkperes 3 years ago