And, I believe, the conversation with the sound guy included his saying that it seemed the person shifting it even overcompensated, coming out sounding even younger than intended.
Oh RJ, you poor thing. 1000 words a day. And your comment was posted something more than a year and a half ago. That's around 560 days so around 560,000 words so, goodness me, you really do have War and Peace there. And the whole thing diving into more and more ridiculous nonsense. I see your partner in crime decided to quit our tubes. Wise of him; perhaps he should be working on paying his backlogs of child support instead of chasing teenagers around YouTube, right?
And managed to do it consistently, not only in a recorded cell-phone call but in several videos. Which brings up the question - were the voice samples from those videos sent along for comparison? If not, why not? I don't suppose Troy might have been worried that his "expert" would say they were all the same voice?
Idedinor, you could not be more right. My grandfather once had a jadestone green 1982 Buick LeSabre & it obviously looked green in direct sunlight but if you moved it into the shade or looked at it on a cloudy day, it took on a hue that would almost make it look like it was light blue. I bet you ANYTHING that if I showed Troy pictures of this Buick in direct sunlight, in the shade, & on a cloudy day, all of which I have, he would claim that they were 3 different cars which is NOT SO!
Exactly! My grandfather had a jadestone green 1982 Buick LeSabre & depending on which way the light would hit it, it could probably look like it was either green or powder blue. If the car was sitting in direct sunlight, then you could obviously tell it was green. However, in the shade or on a cloudy day, it took on more of a bluish hue.
YT is such a tease. But that's okay, fake boy sock puppet. Stay right where you are. I want you up and running when the book is finished. Before this is over, your copyrighted username is going to be synonymous with pedophilia throughout the country. Oh, wait: it already is. Okay, even more synonymous.
Oh so he has to wait for 'the book' now, does he? Are you planning to write a separate book about every teenager you try to chase off YouTube, Troy, or will the one work of genius cover them all?
If I thought chasing or scaring kids off YT would make them safe from men like you, I would do it, but I deal with adults, not children. My vlogs are aimed at the parents of these children, as well as YT corporate and 'the YT community', if such a thing can be said to exist in a real, substantiative way. And sock puppet? If you were brought out as some kind of trolling weapon by the YTV, they need to trade you in for a better model.
LOL. You can't beat us, Dyna. And you know, there are those who had their doubts about you, who thought maybe you were just a supercilious twit with an unhealthy obsession for young boys. Not me: I had your number from the start, just as I did with UpDownMostly. You're an altogether sick, evil, twisted piece of work, and a petty, small, unchristian part of me very much likes making you look the fool every time we encounter one another.
Odd how I always end up being proven right, you always end up being proven wrong, and then you make a comment about how you've made me look like a fool...
By the way, you forgot to add "Gott Mit Uns" to the end of your comment.
Get over the Nazi allusions, you ridiculous man. If memory serves, you compared Gallipoka's and Jesari's YT suspensions to the Holocaust. Yes, that's right: you compared the suspensions of two meagerly talented boys to the murder of 6 million people. That's just plain twisted and wrong, and demonstrates more than anything your idiotically relatvistic moral perspective.
Quite apart from your famously inaccurate memory, Troy, you don't seem to have much knowledge of history either. The phrase DynaCatlovesme quoted predated the Nazi era by a very long time indeed. Please come back when you can make sense.
No, it's "abstruse." Go back to your dictionary. You find that "obtuse" pretty well describes a person who sees brown eyes and says "they're green!" To find a description of a person who then sees that the same eyes are blue and then says "they're still green!" you may need the DSM).
Perhaps a color-sampling of the actual shots would be in order, and we'll see what the computer thinks the color is. (And I know what abstruse is -- don't be so obtuse.)
Silvrspun, Santi101, TobrianHorde, BigCD02 aka rangerguy83, Spanky aka ILSP8NKU, WMCritest, Gary aka MyIDisPhat, Tyciol, AZRockHoundz, Joshua aka Boyota, Cunningham360, et al are not figments of my imagination. The fraudulence of your account is not a figment of my imagination. The threat to children on this site is not a figment of my imagination. I'll continue to identify and expose you and yours until I'm shut down.
Why did you add Cunningham360 to your list? A rather cheap rhetorical trick from the "Propoganda Minister" of the Yahweh Clan.
"Silvrspun, Santi101, TobrianHorde, BigCD02 aka rangerguy83, Spanky aka ILSP8NKU, WMCritest, Gary aka MyIDisPhat, Tyciol, AZRockHoundz, Joshua aka Boyota, and troyriser will all be exposed." Same thing.
Not a cheap rhetorical trick. I included Cunningham360 on my list because he is a batshit crazy pedophile who flies into a shrieking rage whenever his odd little semi-naked little boy montage videos are questioned. But please, by all means, defend him. I love it when you guys defend the indefensible.
Some of your Yahweh Clan friends have posted full frontal and rear nudity of naked little boys on both YouTube and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Not sure what offensive content Cunningham360 has posted. Do you have a link to said videos?
See our video "YouTube Predator: MatisseVonMajestique" The private parts are blocked-off, but you can see the full child nudity at EncyclopediaDramatica.
Logan, of course what I write off-camera matters and is a matter of public record, but that's generally confined to an audience comprised entirely of those running in our circle, for lack of a better word, hence the distinction. Of course, you could always respond to my charges of fraud and deception of children with a vlog and probably succeed in discrediting me and everything I've said and written, but you won't because you can't. You can start by explaining why you pitch-altered your voice.
"You can start by explaining why you pitch-altered your voice."
That is speculation, not fact. One could say "Troyriser never explained why he shot those people driving on the freeway". You said you were a trained sniper. Because you COULD do it does not mean you DID do it.
Dyna, of course I've sought out expert opinion, naturally, obviously. But as I've said, the voice pitch alteration is enough on its own to prove deliberate deception. All else is cake--and it is very delicious cake, too, I might add.
It's interesting, fake pedohunting internet tough guy superhero, that you've gone back to your old habit of dodging questions. CobaltDiselenide asked you, 'your Yahweh Clan friends have posted full frontal and rear nudity of naked little boys on both YouTube and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Not sure what offensive content Cunningham360 has posted. Do you have a link to said videos?' Surely if there is concerning material out there, we have a right to know about it? Or are you lying? Again?
LOL. Amazing how 'HelpTruth' becomes community property after the fact. You guys must work overtime covering for Irish282's after dinner drinking bouts.
Honorary medals for YTV members? Deputize them? Sorry, Logan, but I'm sure most law enforcement agencies throughout the world already have plenty of trained personnel to conduct strip searches at various Juvenile Detention Centers.
This is a comment test, CD. If you employ comment approval or blocking--or do creative deletions of unfavorable comments after the fact--I'm pulling this video from video responses. btw, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourselves by featuring a boy on your video?
By the way, fake pedohunting internet tough guy superhero, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourself by stalking teenage boys all over YouTube? And demanding they make videos for you?
LoganSperman2 is an obvious fraud, so asking that he verify his identity via the simple expedient of a vlog is not and was not an unreasonable request--especially since 'Logan' had already posted a video supposedly showing himself in drag and waving a dildo, and so is by no means camera shy. And for the record: I did not ask Rentoma to prove his identity via video. His video showing his passport had already been made since, unknown to me, suspicions about his age had been aroused before.
troyriser (1 month ago) Show Hide -3 btw, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourselves by featuring a boy on your video?
It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that I'd been looking for a single video that would make the point and that I already knew what song I wanted to use and that I realized that this video could be timed to almost make it seemed lip-synced and show emotions that were appropriate to the song, could it? Just impossible!
Lucky for you, the one video that met all that criteria just happened to feature a young boy. (But then, if you're looking through a barrel of apples for an apple...)
Yeah, what are the odds of that? But then wasn't it lucky for you and Howard that the winners of that middle-school "library competence" contest turned out to be little girls? What "prizes" did you guys give them? (IS there a Howard, BTW)? Wasn't that something near 500 miles of travel for you, just to meet up with some little girls that know how to use a library? How was St. Louis that night? Inquiring minds want to know...
Digg deeper, Jimmy. :) But thanks for reading my stuff. (Yeah, you know, some people actually *do* do things to help kids. And they do it with their real names, and parents involvement, and all that good stuff.)
Been waiting to see if Logan would address your hypocracy here, since you are pretty much quoting him in your own defense. Oh the irony! On a "suspicion meter," what you did is at least twice as great as UDM going to 777last July,yet you have no problem calling him a pedophile on that basis.
You talk about parental involvement and real names - yeah, I'm so sure that you had permission from all the parents to insinuate yourself into their kids' lives - in a pig's eye!
As for real names - isn't it odd that eveyone knows Tim's but nobody knows yours? Everyone knows exactly where Tim is, and nobody knows where you are (well not exactly). Add up your little excursion with your fascination with "Alice," and if I were one of your buddies (which thankfully for you I'm not) I'd be screaming "PEDOPHILE!" from the rooftops!
But you see, that's not what I do, becuase I'm sane - it's what you and you budiies do.
No, not done with you yet, RJ. In the unlikely event that you had parental permission slips to meet up with those kids. I bet you were (self) described to them as "Wolrd-renowned, prize wininng author, journalis and critic, blah,blah,blah..." You may have even thrown in "prominent anti-pedophile activist" for good measure. Well we all know those are lies, RJ. You are a hack with delusions and taht's all you'll ever be.
What I'll bet you didn't tell tham is that you've given permission for one of your article to appear on a site that promotes and hosts child pornography, advocates teenage suicide, celebrates the Holocaust, advocates lynching of "niggers," etc., and that you call these people your friends.
Let's be very clear, RJ. As with Troy, there are only two possible scenarios that encompass you: either you know what you are doing is evil and you choose to do it anyway (short definition of sociopath) or you don't know that what you are doing is evil, in which case you are insane, by any defintion (i.e. mentally incompetent). Either way, if I were a parent I wouldn't let you get within shouting distance of one of my children, and no good parent would.
(Don't bother counting typos, RJ - I know you'd love to). For the time being, I'm working on the assumption that you are mentally incompetent, as opposed to Troy who I am assuming is a true sociopath. The fact remains, that the mentally incompetent shold NOT be involved directly with children in any capacity except under the strictest supervision by thoses that are aware of the person's affliction. I do not see you going out of your way to ensure that, in your own case.
In the meantime "one who really cares for kids," you brag all over YouTube how you will destroy a 13 year-old kid and his little kid friends by whatever means - now including a new work of fiction, which you claim is "progressing at 1000 words a day." You belong in jail RJ. Just like Troy and the rest of his "merry men."
So now you're a certified psychologist in addition to being a renowned geneticist? I'd put my videos up against your videos to someone wanting to do a personality profile any day, and see who comes out the 'sociopath.' What's that? I don't have any? Well, we'll just have to do something about that, won't we, Jimmy? After all, it's only $10 for a camera. (Psst, can you loan Logan $10? He can't see to get one.)
I did not call you a sociopath, are you calling yourself one? I'll stick with my original assessment for now, since you're displaying classic avoidance.
Let's be clear on this. I did not give permission. I simply have not chosen to enforce copyright. In fact, so long as the wording is not changed, I never will. Consider it a public service.
ED a "public service?" Wise decision, though, not to enforce copyright against ED, nasty things happen to people that do. Somehow, though, I think you'd be an exception.
Wow, since Mommy went, you've really lost all the shackles on your inhibitions, haven't you Jimmy? Don't beat around the bush, tells us what you really think you think.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
"Tlaking" directly to you, Jimmy. But as little as possible. I almost feel like I have to wipe the slime from my typing fingers after just addressing one of your comments.
Has anyone else noted the level of your displaced aggression in the past few weeks? Can it be you need a new target to vent your frustrations upon? Gotta admit, that creeps me out a little.
"Displaced" is an interesting word choice. It suggests that you believe you should be a target of my "anger" but have been neglected thus far. It would be more interesting if you actually said anything regarding your shameful behavior, rather than trying to create distractions.
No, it clearly denotes that I am the *new* target of your anger, "Norman." As for my "behavior" -- as always, I'll speak about that in the past tense. Once more behavior has been accomplished (and it will be), I'll let you know what it was.
Well, that certainly required some parsing. So, what you are trying to say is that I was incorrect, you're a true sociopath, and not just mentally incompetent.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice to see that you had time to read some Orwell while sweeping floors at that former janitorial job. There may actually be something akin to a brain under that mop.
Note that the young man in the video gave permission to use his clips. Can't say the same for the kids on your flyer, or for the photos of Logan on Troyriser's personal website, or the use of Logan's voice in a video. Where is the parental permission you and Troyriser like to speak of?
Troy does sometimes like to contact parents, but only as a method of intimidating kids that he's stalking. He has also talked about phoning the police on kids' college campuses to intimidate them.
And, I believe, the conversation with the sound guy included his saying that it seemed the person shifting it even overcompensated, coming out sounding even younger than intended.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
You 'believe' a lot of things, 'TheRJCarter', it's just such a pity that you can justify or explain so few of them.
Indidenor 3 years ago 2
I believe I'm explaining and justifying at the rate of 1000 words a day.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Oh RJ, you poor thing. 1000 words a day. And your comment was posted something more than a year and a half ago. That's around 560 days so around 560,000 words so, goodness me, you really do have War and Peace there. And the whole thing diving into more and more ridiculous nonsense. I see your partner in crime decided to quit our tubes. Wise of him; perhaps he should be working on paying his backlogs of child support instead of chasing teenagers around YouTube, right?
Indidenor 2 years ago
And managed to do it consistently, not only in a recorded cell-phone call but in several videos. Which brings up the question - were the voice samples from those videos sent along for comparison? If not, why not? I don't suppose Troy might have been worried that his "expert" would say they were all the same voice?
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 2
Idedinor, you could not be more right. My grandfather once had a jadestone green 1982 Buick LeSabre & it obviously looked green in direct sunlight but if you moved it into the shade or looked at it on a cloudy day, it took on a hue that would almost make it look like it was light blue. I bet you ANYTHING that if I showed Troy pictures of this Buick in direct sunlight, in the shade, & on a cloudy day, all of which I have, he would claim that they were 3 different cars which is NOT SO!
landyachtfan79 3 years ago 2
By the way, I am sorry if it looks like I have a double post, I didn't think my last one took.
landyachtfan79 3 years ago
Exactly! My grandfather had a jadestone green 1982 Buick LeSabre & depending on which way the light would hit it, it could probably look like it was either green or powder blue. If the car was sitting in direct sunlight, then you could obviously tell it was green. However, in the shade or on a cloudy day, it took on more of a bluish hue.
landyachtfan79 3 years ago
YT is such a tease. But that's okay, fake boy sock puppet. Stay right where you are. I want you up and running when the book is finished. Before this is over, your copyrighted username is going to be synonymous with pedophilia throughout the country. Oh, wait: it already is. Okay, even more synonymous.
troyriser 3 years ago
Oh so he has to wait for 'the book' now, does he? Are you planning to write a separate book about every teenager you try to chase off YouTube, Troy, or will the one work of genius cover them all?
Indidenor 3 years ago 2
If I thought chasing or scaring kids off YT would make them safe from men like you, I would do it, but I deal with adults, not children. My vlogs are aimed at the parents of these children, as well as YT corporate and 'the YT community', if such a thing can be said to exist in a real, substantiative way. And sock puppet? If you were brought out as some kind of trolling weapon by the YTV, they need to trade you in for a better model.
troyriser 3 years ago
Wrong as usual fail-troll.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
LOL. You can't beat us, Dyna. And you know, there are those who had their doubts about you, who thought maybe you were just a supercilious twit with an unhealthy obsession for young boys. Not me: I had your number from the start, just as I did with UpDownMostly. You're an altogether sick, evil, twisted piece of work, and a petty, small, unchristian part of me very much likes making you look the fool every time we encounter one another.
troyriser 3 years ago
Odd how I always end up being proven right, you always end up being proven wrong, and then you make a comment about how you've made me look like a fool...
By the way, you forgot to add "Gott Mit Uns" to the end of your comment.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Get over the Nazi allusions, you ridiculous man. If memory serves, you compared Gallipoka's and Jesari's YT suspensions to the Holocaust. Yes, that's right: you compared the suspensions of two meagerly talented boys to the murder of 6 million people. That's just plain twisted and wrong, and demonstrates more than anything your idiotically relatvistic moral perspective.
troyriser 3 years ago
You're memory serves you about as well as expected: highly selective and completely incorrect!
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Quite apart from your famously inaccurate memory, Troy, you don't seem to have much knowledge of history either. The phrase DynaCatlovesme quoted predated the Nazi era by a very long time indeed. Please come back when you can make sense.
Indidenor 3 years ago
'Got Mit Uns' was inscribed on the belt buckles of German soldiers in WWI. I assumed--quite naturally--it was Dynacatlovesme making the mistake.
troyriser 3 years ago
I may be abstruse at times, but rarely incorrect.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
And yet, so often here.
And it's 'obtuse.'
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
No, it's "abstruse." Go back to your dictionary. You find that "obtuse" pretty well describes a person who sees brown eyes and says "they're green!" To find a description of a person who then sees that the same eyes are blue and then says "they're still green!" you may need the DSM).
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 3
Perhaps a color-sampling of the actual shots would be in order, and we'll see what the computer thinks the color is. (And I know what abstruse is -- don't be so obtuse.)
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Now you are just being deliberatly obtuse. But suit yourself and go for it.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 2
I sense a haughty spirit... You know where that'll get you! Tsk tsk!
TheLordJehovah 3 years ago
four
SubsevenRising 3 years ago
Four what?
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
I remember four. That was a good day.
TheLordJehovah 3 years ago
Silvrspun, Santi101, TobrianHorde, BigCD02 aka rangerguy83, Spanky aka ILSP8NKU, WMCritest, Gary aka MyIDisPhat, Tyciol, AZRockHoundz, Joshua aka Boyota, Cunningham360, et al are not figments of my imagination. The fraudulence of your account is not a figment of my imagination. The threat to children on this site is not a figment of my imagination. I'll continue to identify and expose you and yours until I'm shut down.
troyriser 3 years ago
Why did you add Cunningham360 to your list? A rather cheap rhetorical trick from the "Propoganda Minister" of the Yahweh Clan.
"Silvrspun, Santi101, TobrianHorde, BigCD02 aka rangerguy83, Spanky aka ILSP8NKU, WMCritest, Gary aka MyIDisPhat, Tyciol, AZRockHoundz, Joshua aka Boyota, and troyriser will all be exposed." Same thing.
CobaltDiselenide 3 years ago
Not a cheap rhetorical trick. I included Cunningham360 on my list because he is a batshit crazy pedophile who flies into a shrieking rage whenever his odd little semi-naked little boy montage videos are questioned. But please, by all means, defend him. I love it when you guys defend the indefensible.
troyriser 3 years ago
Some of your Yahweh Clan friends have posted full frontal and rear nudity of naked little boys on both YouTube and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Not sure what offensive content Cunningham360 has posted. Do you have a link to said videos?
CobaltDiselenide 3 years ago
See our video "YouTube Predator: MatisseVonMajestique" The private parts are blocked-off, but you can see the full child nudity at EncyclopediaDramatica.
CobaltDiselenide 3 years ago
Logan, of course what I write off-camera matters and is a matter of public record, but that's generally confined to an audience comprised entirely of those running in our circle, for lack of a better word, hence the distinction. Of course, you could always respond to my charges of fraud and deception of children with a vlog and probably succeed in discrediting me and everything I've said and written, but you won't because you can't. You can start by explaining why you pitch-altered your voice.
troyriser 3 years ago
troyriser (8 minutes ago)
"You can start by explaining why you pitch-altered your voice."
That is speculation, not fact. One could say "Troyriser never explained why he shot those people driving on the freeway". You said you were a trained sniper. Because you COULD do it does not mean you DID do it.
CobaltDiselenide 3 years ago
"Forensic artist?" Would that be You, Doja, or Kitty? LMAO!
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Dyna, of course I've sought out expert opinion, naturally, obviously. But as I've said, the voice pitch alteration is enough on its own to prove deliberate deception. All else is cake--and it is very delicious cake, too, I might add.
troyriser 3 years ago
It's interesting, fake pedohunting internet tough guy superhero, that you've gone back to your old habit of dodging questions. CobaltDiselenide asked you, 'your Yahweh Clan friends have posted full frontal and rear nudity of naked little boys on both YouTube and Encyclopedia Dramatica. Not sure what offensive content Cunningham360 has posted. Do you have a link to said videos?' Surely if there is concerning material out there, we have a right to know about it? Or are you lying? Again?
Indidenor 3 years ago 3
Keep defending Cunningham360. Dig that hole.
troyriser 3 years ago
LOL. Amazing how 'HelpTruth' becomes community property after the fact. You guys must work overtime covering for Irish282's after dinner drinking bouts.
troyriser 3 years ago
Honorary medals for YTV members? Deputize them? Sorry, Logan, but I'm sure most law enforcement agencies throughout the world already have plenty of trained personnel to conduct strip searches at various Juvenile Detention Centers.
troyriser 3 years ago
Ask them to email or PM me. I think I could safely be called a lot of unkind and unflattering things. 'Moron' isn't one of them.
troyriser 3 years ago
Wait, disingenuousness and obfuscation aren't just habit with you, are they, Logan? It's your job: who you are, what you do.
troyriser 3 years ago
Done.
troyriser 3 years ago
Troy, you need to upload it as well then. That's why no-one has seen it.
Indidenor 3 years ago 3
This is a comment test, CD. If you employ comment approval or blocking--or do creative deletions of unfavorable comments after the fact--I'm pulling this video from video responses. btw, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourselves by featuring a boy on your video?
troyriser 3 years ago
By the way, fake pedohunting internet tough guy superhero, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourself by stalking teenage boys all over YouTube? And demanding they make videos for you?
Indidenor 3 years ago 2
LoganSperman2 is an obvious fraud, so asking that he verify his identity via the simple expedient of a vlog is not and was not an unreasonable request--especially since 'Logan' had already posted a video supposedly showing himself in drag and waving a dildo, and so is by no means camera shy. And for the record: I did not ask Rentoma to prove his identity via video. His video showing his passport had already been made since, unknown to me, suspicions about his age had been aroused before.
troyriser 3 years ago
troyriser (1 month ago) Show Hide -3 btw, do you realize how glaringly you announce yourselves by featuring a boy on your video?
It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that I'd been looking for a single video that would make the point and that I already knew what song I wanted to use and that I realized that this video could be timed to almost make it seemed lip-synced and show emotions that were appropriate to the song, could it? Just impossible!
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Lucky for you, the one video that met all that criteria just happened to feature a young boy. (But then, if you're looking through a barrel of apples for an apple...)
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Yeah, what are the odds of that? But then wasn't it lucky for you and Howard that the winners of that middle-school "library competence" contest turned out to be little girls? What "prizes" did you guys give them? (IS there a Howard, BTW)? Wasn't that something near 500 miles of travel for you, just to meet up with some little girls that know how to use a library? How was St. Louis that night? Inquiring minds want to know...
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Digg deeper, Jimmy. :) But thanks for reading my stuff. (Yeah, you know, some people actually *do* do things to help kids. And they do it with their real names, and parents involvement, and all that good stuff.)
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Been waiting to see if Logan would address your hypocracy here, since you are pretty much quoting him in your own defense. Oh the irony! On a "suspicion meter," what you did is at least twice as great as UDM going to 777last July,yet you have no problem calling him a pedophile on that basis.
You talk about parental involvement and real names - yeah, I'm so sure that you had permission from all the parents to insinuate yourself into their kids' lives - in a pig's eye!
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
As for real names - isn't it odd that eveyone knows Tim's but nobody knows yours? Everyone knows exactly where Tim is, and nobody knows where you are (well not exactly). Add up your little excursion with your fascination with "Alice," and if I were one of your buddies (which thankfully for you I'm not) I'd be screaming "PEDOPHILE!" from the rooftops!
But you see, that's not what I do, becuase I'm sane - it's what you and you budiies do.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
No, not done with you yet, RJ. In the unlikely event that you had parental permission slips to meet up with those kids. I bet you were (self) described to them as "Wolrd-renowned, prize wininng author, journalis and critic, blah,blah,blah..." You may have even thrown in "prominent anti-pedophile activist" for good measure. Well we all know those are lies, RJ. You are a hack with delusions and taht's all you'll ever be.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
What I'll bet you didn't tell tham is that you've given permission for one of your article to appear on a site that promotes and hosts child pornography, advocates teenage suicide, celebrates the Holocaust, advocates lynching of "niggers," etc., and that you call these people your friends.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
Let's be very clear, RJ. As with Troy, there are only two possible scenarios that encompass you: either you know what you are doing is evil and you choose to do it anyway (short definition of sociopath) or you don't know that what you are doing is evil, in which case you are insane, by any defintion (i.e. mentally incompetent). Either way, if I were a parent I wouldn't let you get within shouting distance of one of my children, and no good parent would.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
(Don't bother counting typos, RJ - I know you'd love to). For the time being, I'm working on the assumption that you are mentally incompetent, as opposed to Troy who I am assuming is a true sociopath. The fact remains, that the mentally incompetent shold NOT be involved directly with children in any capacity except under the strictest supervision by thoses that are aware of the person's affliction. I do not see you going out of your way to ensure that, in your own case.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
In the meantime "one who really cares for kids," you brag all over YouTube how you will destroy a 13 year-old kid and his little kid friends by whatever means - now including a new work of fiction, which you claim is "progressing at 1000 words a day." You belong in jail RJ. Just like Troy and the rest of his "merry men."
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
So now you're a certified psychologist in addition to being a renowned geneticist? I'd put my videos up against your videos to someone wanting to do a personality profile any day, and see who comes out the 'sociopath.' What's that? I don't have any? Well, we'll just have to do something about that, won't we, Jimmy? After all, it's only $10 for a camera. (Psst, can you loan Logan $10? He can't see to get one.)
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
I did not call you a sociopath, are you calling yourself one? I'll stick with my original assessment for now, since you're displaying classic avoidance.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 3
Oh, I almost forgot. If you're going to login for Troy to check his comments, why didn't you reply to the OTHER one?
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 3
Let's be clear on this. I did not give permission. I simply have not chosen to enforce copyright. In fact, so long as the wording is not changed, I never will. Consider it a public service.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
ED a "public service?" Wise decision, though, not to enforce copyright against ED, nasty things happen to people that do. Somehow, though, I think you'd be an exception.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 2
Wow, since Mommy went, you've really lost all the shackles on your inhibitions, haven't you Jimmy? Don't beat around the bush, tells us what you really think you think.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
I love the sound of frustration and desperation in the evening.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Tlaking to youself? That's another bad sign, RJ. Why not address the issues?
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"Tlaking" directly to you, Jimmy. But as little as possible. I almost feel like I have to wipe the slime from my typing fingers after just addressing one of your comments.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Then why do you type so much but communicate nothing?
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 4
Which says more about your capacity for understanding than anything, I think.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
I agree with your statement, as worded, of course. I certainly understand you far better than you understand yourself.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 3
Has anyone else noted the level of your displaced aggression in the past few weeks? Can it be you need a new target to vent your frustrations upon? Gotta admit, that creeps me out a little.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
"Displaced" is an interesting word choice. It suggests that you believe you should be a target of my "anger" but have been neglected thus far. It would be more interesting if you actually said anything regarding your shameful behavior, rather than trying to create distractions.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago
No, it clearly denotes that I am the *new* target of your anger, "Norman." As for my "behavior" -- as always, I'll speak about that in the past tense. Once more behavior has been accomplished (and it will be), I'll let you know what it was.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Well, that certainly required some parsing. So, what you are trying to say is that I was incorrect, you're a true sociopath, and not just mentally incompetent.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 5
You were correct? But you said before that you never said that? Experiencing another reality shift, Jimmy? You should talk to someone about those.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
Read it again RJ, "incorrect" does not mean "correct." Well, maybe in your universe, where "lies = truth," "slavery = freedom," and so on.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice to see that you had time to read some Orwell while sweeping floors at that former janitorial job. There may actually be something akin to a brain under that mop.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
And the evidence accumulates; keep talking.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Planning the precise opposite, actually. I've graced this video enough with my presence, and have better, stronger, faster things to do.
Worry.
TheRJCarter 3 years ago
What, Me Worry!? If you were not a danger to the community at large, you'd crack me up!
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 5
Note that the young man in the video gave permission to use his clips. Can't say the same for the kids on your flyer, or for the photos of Logan on Troyriser's personal website, or the use of Logan's voice in a video. Where is the parental permission you and Troyriser like to speak of?
ClanWatch 3 years ago 5
Troy does sometimes like to contact parents, but only as a method of intimidating kids that he's stalking. He has also talked about phoning the police on kids' college campuses to intimidate them.
Indidenor 3 years ago
So, are you saying that killert00thbrush is plotting to destroy individuality?
Kryptoburn257 3 years ago 3
Lol, not really, no.
DynaCatlovesme 3 years ago 2