The fact that she was in Africa when he was born shows she dosent know. Republicans have confirmed his BC. Independants have confirmed it. Every media outlet has and even the republican govoner. Birthers dont care about the facts. They just want to discredit the first black president...
Wheres the original creature that evolved from goo. This still doesnt show how we all of a sudden were on this planet. And alot of these are described to be more like chimps and apes.
The first organism was single celled. You wont find it. Evolution does not state how life began it states how life changes. Abiogenusis states how life began. They are two diffrent theorys.
Thats what im talking about. Evolution and creationism are used to make claim on how intelligent life began on earth. Considering that plants and animals have totally different chromosome mappings and fossil records of existance. Both have shortfalls. But what would fill those short falls would be if we were colonized. We assume life exist elsewhere our planet could of been terraformed for us. Thats what we plan to do if we can get off of it onto anther one.
Thunderfoot explained clearly why its imposible. You just lack comprehention. If the grand canyon was formed in 5 mins the water would have to travel 5x the speed of sound. And you obviously know nothing about erosion. See dude you either need to stop lying about your 6 years in college or sue your college for incompantance
Why would speed have to do with it? We are talking about an abundance of water that buried all land in a short time and ran off back into the deep. Sandstone errodes fast. If you flooded a high elevated desert and washed away the sand. you would have a canyon. Mudslides are no different and thats with moderate rain. Does thunderfoot take that into consideration?
Oh yeah. Thunderfoot has over 60k subs. He also some videos of him debating ray comfort. This guy knows his shit. Every creationist thats called this fucker out he has utterly destroyed. And I am not saying that cause I like his views. Check out his videos and you will know what I mean.
After they are done building this, I hope the israelis and americans don't fly planes into again. They will probably come up with something more diabolical this time.
If many sources confirmed it I would. But that hardly proves anything. All of that is circumstantial. If we uncovored a Brittish spy ring does that mean they did 9/11. You sound like an anti-semetic to me.
show me a real scientist that would admit that with credentials. And i'll have him rewrite chemistry and biology courses in existance that say otherwise.
Umm like every scientist says co2 is causing GW. I mean I dont know how to explain it its like explaining how a pencil works. Its so obvious. Why is Venus hotter then Murcury yet farther from the sun? Its cause Venus has an atmosphere full of CO2 that traps heat.
Well then lets define what creates heat. Pressure and friction. Without pressure you have a vaccum(cold) doesnt matter what the gas is. its compression of molecules. This is how a/c works. We have barometric pressure which stays fairly consistant. when its high we have heat when its low we have cold. High and lows. doesnt matter if theres co2 nitrogen or oxygen tempertures a relation of pressure. seasons change not because of co2 its always hot in summer and cold in winter.
this baloney science blaming man and only charging americans a co2 tax is a scam it doesnt do anything but make more bueracracy and pay gore and control people. its false crap.
Yeah yeah thats what you people say about Evolution. Question? Why are you people so anti-science? 99% of scientist say man is cause for GW yet you ignore it and say they are wrong. 99.9% of scientist say evolution is a fact yet 60% of rightys say they are wrong....
actually evolution and creationism are both theorys neither can be proven. as with 99% scientist i doubt that. theres a league of scientist that sued al gore for purjury. With a list of thousands of scientist that have signed petitions saying its bullshit.
OMG Evolution has already been proven. And yes 99% of scientist believe in evolution. Go to any scientific forum and present anything that goes against evolution and you will be laughed out that room. I would like to see this list please present it. There is no professor at my college that would ever say evolution is BS. I did make my arguments logicly. You just wont except them. Your like the moon landing deniers or the birthers.. You wont except it.
If there are plausable alternate circumstances that fits the same logic and the end result would answer all questions then that would be the most likely truth. As with evolution which came first the egg or the chicken? You cant prove it. As with birthers. show the long form why no transparency? As with the moon why cant any telescopes show the landing site with the moon buggys. We have satilites that can read the print your newspaper. Curious eh? you assume with no proof and except it.
Evolution has already been proven and tested. Its fact. Every biology book says its fact. If evolution was not fact all our cures would be uselss. And many are becoming usless because of people like you. Obama has already shown his BC. You people wont except it no matter what he does. Probably because hes black. So you are also a moon lander denier. Jesus I bet you also believe the royal family is made up of reptiles from another world. You people are so pathetic. I feel sorry for you.
No. evolution has not been proven it has been theorized. they have not found fossils with dna or chromosone patterns that show evolution of man or complex life forms from goo. Cures have nothing to do with evolution. there are two types of birth certificates he has not that official one. And it has nothing to do with because he is black it has to do with law. They had congressional meetings about mccain because he was born in panama had to vote him as a citizen. However because of the date
and the laws at that time and that both his parents were not americans and that in discovery there is conflict of storys. All he has to show is his long form. He has locked it down as with all his school records. People who hide stuff are usually guilty of something. Wouldnt you like to know why he preaches transparency and doesnt want it to apply with him. I smell a rat and it should be published. He is our president and should be honest.
Only one of your parents need to be American when you are born. And you need to be born on American soil which he was. He hasent locked down anything. Its a law in Hawaii not to give out the origianl BC. Yes he can fail because the bill still needs to pass the house and senate. All he can do is either sign it or veto it. He cant make it pass the senate or house. I can find 1000 scientist. Name one and I WILL give you 1000. Sweaden and Japan are socialist nations and are amoung the richest...
Its also law that he can release that info. Which he doesnt so he is still hiding it. There was a reward for any witness or hospitals to come forward. So they could adorn the birth place of obama. But none. His grandmother in kenya said she witnessed his birth in mambas. In which is territory of english rule under his dad. which makes him subject to that. His long form will prove his legitamacy. Swedan and japan are constitutional monarchys. And japan was sucking pretty hard in the 90's
First problem when Obama was born Mambasa was not part of kenya. It was part of Zanzibar. Second in that interview she corrected herself right after saying that and said he was born in Hawaii. I like how you omit that part. Like I said you dont care for facts. The king of sweaden and the emperor of Japan have no real power. They are just figure heads. Sweaden and Japan are classified as socialist nations. So is france and Germany also VERY rich nations....
Mombasa is the second largest city in Kenya, lying on coast Look it up. . ANd your saying the queen of england also has no power that she is just a figure head BS. The facts are going to be on his long form. so lets see the evidence. (facts) you dont care for the facts. And what does a rich nation mean?
Yes Evolution has been proven. You still dont understand what a theory is " the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another." That means anything thats a theory has been PROVEN to be fact. Cures do have somthing to do with evolution. When we create a cure it is to kill the infection or virus. We have to keep changing that cure however. Because the bacteria or virus evolves an immunity to the cure. Obama has show what was required of all presidents.
One definition of theory a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b : an unproved assumption : conjecture
Without investigation its unproved. Without evidence it is conjecture. Theorys without proof cannot be stated as fact until you find or recreate the result. The bacteria is still a bacteria it is not evolving into a new life form with an IQ just adapting to its surrounding. and no obama hasn't
But it has evolved into a new life form. "In evolutionary theory, any population that adapts to cope with new challenges (such as antibiotics) will make trade-offs." Source: physorgdotcom/news104764947.html
first of all anti bodies is what your body produces. There is no cure. Its exposure to a foreign organism that your body maps to attack. thats the idea. there fore your immune system evolves but that doesnt change its function. that is not what darwin evolution is about.
thats the first of many of Thunderfoots videos called "why people laugh at creationist" If you truly desire more knowledge and you want to see opposing views you wont be a bitch and you will check them out. I think he is a college professor of some kind. Lastly at the time of OBamas birth Mombasa was NOT part of kenya. It is now. But it was not then So its immposible he could have been born in both Mombasa and kenya.
You are so retarded. LOOK at an atlas Mombasa is ia city in kenya on the coast. So yes.. He can be born in mombasa which is inside kenya. Are you saying you cant be born in a state if you born in a city inside it? You have this unbelievable pretzel logic. Im not a creationist nor into darwin both do not have enough evidence to prove either true. there is always another explaination.
Mombasa was NOT part of kenya in 1961 because it was part of a diffrent nation called Zanzibar in 1961. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Mombasa was a city inside of Zanzibar. Kenya annexed Mombasa in december 1961. Obama could not have been born in both Kenya and Mombasa. If he was born in Mombasa he would have been born in the country of Zanzibar.
Well mombasa is not part of zanzibar anymore is it? So all purposes he is born in kenya. If you told people that he was born in mombasa zanzibar they will never find it on a map now would they?
Well sice he wasent born in either Mombasa or Kenya it dosent matter. Water cannot erode rock that fast. There is no evidance saying it can. It takes millions of years for it to happen. If rock could erode that fast we would have surly documented it by now. And new canyons would be forming all the time. Like dozens in a life time. If you can show me a time when a tsunami created somthing like the grade canyon in 5 mins I will gladly concead defeat. But you cant cause its never happened....
Well why would his grandmother at first show the hut and talk about his birth in kenya. THis will only be solved when he shows his original long form.
Well we havent had ice glaciers covering most of the earth so it hasnt happened in our lifetime but could of back then. There are more things then rocks that errode. sand, dirt ,mud. all wash away.
Why would his grandma say he was born in both Mombasa and Kenya? She obviously dosent know what shes talking about. He dosent need to prove anything to you. Most sane people believe him. In a recient poll 20% of republicans and 3% were not sure to believe. I would not be worried if I were him. And no it would not be solved even if he showed it. Its a conspiracy theory. Those NEVER die. people who believe this are just a bunch of rednecks pissed off cause their commander-in-chief is a black man
No they are pissed off because our commander and chief is not change and a liar like bush. He might be a change on the administration name but the admin is the same people.
No its about race watch?v=zRqcfqiXCX0 here is a Palin rally a couple months ago. His admin is diffrent hopefully. The fact he is trying to solve issues other politicians only talk about shows he is diffrent. Now if he backs down from this public option hell you can dis him all you want. It will show hes a pussy. But since I am not seeing that yet I will still support him. Evolution has facts behind it. That makes it diffrent from creation.
Boy your a fool. Everyone in his admin is wallstreet tycoons and chicago thugs. Are they black ..NOPE.. SO it has nothing to do with racism. IT has to do with more crooks and cronies and convicted felons. Everything has facts behind it the issue is no record of proof.
Well she is family and you would figure grandmas would know where thier grandbabies were born especially if you were there. Actually she only said he was born in mombasa. Everyone says kenya because that is where mombasa is in now.
I just watched that video. Thunderfoot gave no evidence to contridict why the grand cannon could of been made in 5 min. This planet was over 75%ice. we have citys that have been buried underwater. I can cut through dirt with a water hose. Imagine the power of an ocean through a mountain range. Is that a possiblity? yes. Well i checked your video out. Did you check my video out?
No it is not or we would have seen it over and over again. The grand canyon took millions of years to form. Water cant cut through rock like that. See your stumbling around like an idiot again. Your trying to defy the laws of physics. LOL Water cant cut rock the size of the grand canyon in 5 mins. Its impossible. And if it can show proof.
No we wouldnt because we've only heard of one great world flood. And how do you think canyons are made numbnuts? And that little dinky river in the bottom is not big enough so it took something bigger and wider way back. A sunami size tidal wave can take out a city and buildings. 5 min is over exagsterbated. How about oh 40 days then. Water can do anything. We cut steel with it.
Water cant cut steel natuarly. Also the 40 days story isent real. The bibel says the flood covered the highest mountains. Umm theres not enough water in the world to do that. Even if you melt all the ice caps and brought every last drop from underground it would still not happen. Also the story of Noah is wrong to. A man cannot build a boat large enough to carry every animal. The story of the flood is just a myth. A tsumani cannot make a canyon. That goes against the laws of physics.
And what if the canyons of the abyss were not there to displace water then there would be more water to cover land. And what if some sort of iceburg planetoid collided with earth and melted in the upper atmosphere. Its a possibility. So are you saying a river cant make a canyon?
Well even if there were no canyons at the time (which is rediculous mostly because the oldest known record of human civilization has mentioned canyons) it would still not be enough. A planetoid sized icebur?. Come on think why that would be impossible. One, something that big hitting the earth would probably throw us off our axis like Uranus. If it didnt do that the force of it hitting the Earth would probebly shatter earth.
We have an astroid belt between mars and jupiter according to mathematic harmonics that orbit should of had a planet. could pieces of it not of flung into our orbit and crash. We do have big asteroid craters on some parts of the earth. No one has explained what astronomical event killed the dinosaurs.
Number 1 that intelligence comment was not directed at you but at the guy who posted after you. Number 2 WTF are you talking about? CO2 dosent create heat. It traps it. Heat rays come from the sun that hit Earth.... Most are then reflected back into space..... With high amounts of Co2 it traps it on Earth. We have already seen it on Venus. And the average temp of Earth has been going up.
NO c02 absorbs heat like ice absorbs heat after the heat is gone you have cold. C02 expands in heat or is released in heat. Take a block of dry ice.. CO2 and heat it up. the cold slows down the heat molecules and the gas is released pressure has droped. We hardly have shit in comparison of c02. the earth has been going up over the millenium because the sun has been going up. once it reaches critical mass then it will cool off and we will too. thats history and provable by climate evidence
99% of scientist disagree with you. Co2 is what keeps Venus so fucking hot. So I dont know what to tell you. Look at it from my shoes. I can either listen to the scientist who put a man on the moon or a youtube poster. No creation is not a theory. You people dont understand what a theory is. A theory is the highest point an hypotheisis can become. Gravity is a theory and so are thermodynamics. Creation is not There is 0 evidence for it....
I'll debate any of those "99% scientist" laws of thermal dynmicals and pressure and the definition of heat proves it has nothing to do with co2. Even mars has c02 but man is not on there adding to it and its ice caps are melting. jupiters temperature gets hotter as you get closer to the surface its barometric pressure that retains heat by compressing atoms making friction. thermodyanamics is not a theory its a law of relation it can be proven an tested. if you want to blame something that seems
hot blame humidity, water vapor holds more heat than a gas. Its also a green house gas. thats why hot and humid is nasty and hot and dry is barable. As with theory with an hypothesis. How do you prove creation? Another probable hypothesis is we were probably dumped on this planet by aliens. Which would explain our all of a sudden existence. there are laws of gravity that is provable. Our planet according to science was 75% ice at one time and has been melting ever since. the source is exposure
is the sun in which light is coverted to heat by excited molecules under pressure which is friction. thats why when you are on the ground its warm and when you go to high elevations it gets colder because the pressure is less. mercury has no atmosphere so there is no pressure. vacuum of space. venus has tons of other gases you cant isolate co2 as an insulator of heat. its more conductive which disapates heat which means removes heat. So when tempertures rise c02 is released in relation/reaction
Carbon Diaoxide is the reason for GW. couple that with deforestation you get the perfect storm. There are other gasses in venus atmosphere. But Carbon Dioxide is the one of the main gasses. With more Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere and less trees to filter it you get GW. Scientists say its fact. Corperations namly oil and car ones say its not. I wonder why?
your so hung up on c02 that you ignore all science and laws of science. Lets look at it biology wise. C02 is necessary for plant and aquatic life. The more c02 the bigger crops, fruits and plants grow. Thats a fact. Trees do cool the planet by providing shade. They provide a barrier between the sun and ground. Some light is converted to heat and heat RISES up above trees into cold atmosphere where it is absorbed. When you stand on a hot plate you feel rising heat. At night without the sun
gases condense c02 is absorbed back into the waters trees and plants it is cyclic. algeas underwater plants grow and give off oxygen for the fish. Remember when the dangers of car exhaust was c0 (carbon monoxide) They still produce that. Eventually it does turn to c02 because charge of the molecule is polarized and bonds with free oxygen to balance it. Maybe your problem is that you dont have enough oxygen feeding your logic centers of your brain. or you just didnt learn it. which makes me more
of a scientist than you because i question everything and dont ignore evidence of conflicts and search for explanations that would be make everything fit and not just something convienient that goes against the rules. The truth is the sun is the source that creates excited electrons motion and the pressure of our atmosphere is what creates the atmospher of friction which creates heat. Either increasing the pressure or increasing the sun energy will create hotter output. Barometric pressure
never goes higher than a specific point. So that leaves the sun which also has a cyclic process which involves a heating and cooling period. So the end result the sun is the issue. And thats why all the icecaps are melting in the solar system. and eventually they will start freezing again. Its a long cycle to critical mass.
All the science is on my side. There is a balancing act. And we humans are throwing it off. Trees keep the CO2 levels down by breathing in CO2. there is so much CO2 being pumped in the atmsphere and to little trees cause we are cutting them down. Again 99% of scientist agree with me. It is you who lacks the IQ. Its obvious you are also quoting right wing websites. I can tell Yesterday you were stumbling around like an idiot. Now I feel like I am reading a text book.
So the problem is not c02. Its not enough trees to insulate our planet from radiating heat. C02 is just a result of heat. nature balances all. How am i quoting web sites? This is my education level of 6 years college. If i was stumbling probably because i was tired. ANd maybe you should read a text book because the bullshit you say the quote scientist are saying is not from a scientific textbook. Hopefully im opening logic centers for you. By using the laws of physics and nature to explain it.
We never said it was just CO2. Its lots of reasons. What have I said that is not scientific? Examples? You say you have 6 years of college yet you keep getting the scientific def. of theory wrong You are either lying or you cheated your way through college. "a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation." Thats from your own post. Keywords: for the sake of argument. In the science world theorys are the closent you get to facts
It only takes one unexplainable fact to destroy a theory. I can prove my aligations with experiments showing relations in pressure and temperture. With device we can measure atmospheric pressure. Where are your theorys or facts you just keep spouting 99% scientist say i am right. come on..
No it does not. There are many holes in evolution but that dosent disprove it. You keep saying I am wrong I have yet to see where. Tell me what I said that was wrong. Antibiotics is penicillin. Its made to destroy infections and what not. But these bacteria are starting to evolve to become immune to penicillin acroding to the "U.S journal of medicine." And this is exactly what darwin was talking about. Look up "thunderfoot" and "evirus" these guys do an awsome job of explaining this....
Anything that kills a bacteria can be classified as an antibiotic. It doesnt destroy infections it kills the germ or bacterium that causes the infections. Infections heal once attacking diseases or objects are removed that disrupts immunity. Darwin says we evolved from apes. Apes are still here. there is no proof of that. The bacteria is still a bacteria even if it is stronger it didnt evolve into a new classification of lifeform. Thats the point.
First of all evolution does not state we evolved from apes. It states humans and apes have a common ancestor. Please pick up a biology book. So much for that 6 years in college you had. And yes bacteria has evolved into new life forms. They have tested it in a lad and proved it. This is what I am talking about. You know nothing about evolution and you make grade school mistakes yet you try to argue against it.
Okay then.. Whats the common ancestor that makes us cousins to apes Where is that proof? SHOW ME You can't it doesnt exist. And what proof of a bacteria evolving into a new life form you cant bacterias are still bacterias. You have no proof of evolution that man evolved from primordial goo. That in fossil records we just showed up one day and there were no other indications before that. Thats the whole point. Thats where you get the division of evolutionist vs creationist.
Although the WTC towers were in fact designed to withstand being struck by an airplane, the resultant fires weakened the infrastructure of the building, collapsing the upper floors and creating too much load for the lower floors to bear. Shortly after the attack, both towers collapsed. hopefully, there have been changes made in new buildings. and, of course , secuity is much tighter now.
Well anyone who saw the floorplans and the videos of the steel cage outter structure would question why the outside would collapse like that especially outward over 60 mph. Of course there is the satilite thermol view which you can see rectangles in the middle of the building, super heated and the only thing glowing, concentrated fire on the columns only? Doesnt show heat anywhere else. ITs fishy.
you stupid french fries boy. do you really think that 2 airplanes crashed into the 2 buildings & caused them to collapsed in 9/11? if you dont know chemistry, engineering architect, gravity, physics, then don't bullshit about terrorism that caused this to happened. just remember, americans STILL dont know where is Osama binladen.or this guy a fiction?
The smartest people in the country seem to disagree with you. So it would seem physics is on my side. I find it funny how right wingers are going to try to use science against me. People who deny evolution and global warming, even though they have been proven are going to use science against me? LOL
No, I have been in the court system giving my redress of grievances and I dont pay the fed income tax nor any other Governmental revenue besides the state sales tax.
And your a fact denier. Because rational thought makes your brain hurt and you rather stick your head in the ground because basic physics was to hard for you in school.
I can honestly say Ron Paul was right. The fact you voted for a fascist government notes that you want mommy to run your life. Grow up little kid. or troll
OMG you are so fucking retarded. Fascism is governing using race or religion. You idiots dont even know the meaning of the words you use. Obama is not governing by race or religion. Fascism is right wing idiology genius. Ron Paul is closer to that then anyone. Anyone who saw 2 fucking planes crash into the buildings know it was the planes. Oh but I forgot theres no way a plane loaded with thousends of gallons of jet fuel could bring down a building. Its not fishy its logic.
NO. Fascism is when corporations and governements get in bed with each other. BUt as with race... yeah since you liberals are so into calling everyone racist whos against obamas administration i guess race is part of it.
No. Here is the def of fascism. " a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader." Facsism is right wing idiology not left.
If Obama sounds like a fascist to you then you are an idiot. It dosent need to melt concrete just the steel. Without the steel it fails. If it didnt need the steel we wouldnt use now would we?
the building was combination of steel and reinforced concrete you should look at the video of the making of the wtc
the floors are 1 foot thick concrete slabs with tons of steel rebar. The truss they show that supposedily gave away was only used to hold the frames while the concrete cured. they could of been all removed and the floors would of still been attached to the outside columns.
lol. People dont just get access to vital parts of the building. If it were that easy the 1993 bombing would have been more sucsessful. They have companies they hire. I dont think you understand how much explosives it would have taken. It takes and entire team of men and thousends of dollars in explosives to demolish buildings 1/10th WTC size.
Why dont you understand why we believe it was an inside job? And our government does have this capability. That like bush has shown he can spit on the constitution and do what he likes. That he can threaten like obama is doing now to senators bullying bullshit legislation. That undermines our economy and freedoms.
I think you believe this 9/11 BS because you want to not because of evidence. The same reason some people say evolution didnt happen. there is a mountain of evidence saying it did yet they ignore it.... You are acting out of emotion not logic. And trust me is Obama was bulling people you would know it. Right now hes being to soft.
well since you cant explain the evidence and logically make it all work together makes your theory unsound. You claim mountains of evidence yet there is none. Logic in the wtc would say a fire wouldnt bring 3 buildings down perfectly in a demolitioned fashion. yet you believe that. come on now. whos acting on emotion and not logic? Maybe you should watch all the videos i see of obama and vlogs of senators. His demanding. and threating passage of bill or else.
Okay so what plane hit building 7? And the planes wouldnt of been completely full of fuel. and the fuel would of been mostly gone in the explosion. the fuel burn was upstairs so how did that bring the rest down. You forget the whole outside stucture is tube steel welded to each other side to side with an inner core of steel columns if the floors gave out the outside structure would remain. Dust samples were analyzed and found commercial grade thermite (patented)
First of all link the source that says we found commercial grade thermite in the dust. I would love to read were you got that. Do you realize how much explosives it would take to bring down the main support? In a building no 2 buildings with THOUSENDS of people going in and out. Think about how do you weld? By melting and fusing the atoms together.... Using a hand tool. Its not a streach that a plane loaded with fuel that blasts shuttles to low earth orbit could do it to.
these girders were not welded but bolted. but an aluminum plane supposidley sliced through steel. Yet they were bits of metal after it was was over. Take a bird cage and knock a hole in it does it fall. No the rest of the cage supports it. that is the design of the tower with an inner core. as with taking out the core you just have to have access to the elevators shafts. people could be rigging things in the elevators shafts claiming they are network engineers hidden view.
It dosent matter if it was bolted or welded. It still melts at the same temp. Aluminum is acually really strong. Remember the ISS is built from it. It has to with stand small rocks hitting it at 17k MPH. There are a couple of problems with your bird cage analogy. First is mass. The WTC has far more of it fighting gravity. Second is tensil strength. WTC has to support far more weight. Third is material..... The WTC was hit by a jet carrying jetfuel.
aluminum is not stronger than steel and i can guarantee that there is other metals like titanium used on that ISS. When they designed the WTC they used 20 times the steel to be sure that it wouldnt fall. It was designed to take 8 aircraft hits and still stand by the engineers notes. Heres another fallacy in your logic. as the towers fell all the debris was going up and to the side there fore the weight of the building was getting lighter on the lower structure which supported heavier loads.
I never said aluminum was stronger then steel.. But its not weak. And the ISS is made mosly over aluminum. Its to hard to blast anything else up there. Obama has kept promises. Guantonimo bay is one. And public option is another. We are not now a communist country. In communism you have a single leader we dont have that. In communism there is no free market we have the biggest free market in the world. PLease understand communism before saying it.
He hasnt kept it yet. they are adding to it. Havent you been watching the news. Public option and all is still in debate. Isnt obama our president a single leader? How can we have a free market when government subsidizes and creates monopolys and owns business. we have not had a free market in ages. Obama also said he would get out of the wars. that was a lie off the bat. no change more of the status quo. now health care is going to be government run. Shit we have czars now. how more soviet?
The fact that hes trying shows us that he does intend to keep that promise. So if he fails at the public option are you going to call him a lier. I bet you will cause he failed even thoguh he tried. And no we do not have a single leader. Power is divided between the house, senate and Presdient. He never said he would get us out of Afg. Go look again and he is pulling out of Iraq.
Well he cant fail because he has the power of veto and final sayso. Well maybe you havent been watching our system of governmet because none of them are balancing each other. all the power is going to the executive with consent lobbist and corporations seem to be running the show and obama is making deal privately with pharma in the background. So who is running this country? Its an oligarch. every government has one. dictators, socialism communism, fascism, all. he's leaving a force in iraq.
Meterolgists are also wrong 50% of the time. For every ONE scientist you can find thats against GW I can find 1000 saying hes wrong. See this shows me you dont care for the facts. Also your right. Government run Healthcare is socialism. But I dont care. I would rather have a healthy strong socialist nation then a weak sick one that lets corperations run our lives...
Meterolist seem to know the lows and highs everyday and they are accurate.
bold statement if you think you can find 1000 scientist. I've showed you the facts and some of the variables it is you that ignores logic that is taught or was taught. We have gone from one of the most educated to the dumbest countrys in 50 years. If you knew your history you wouldnt be praising socialism or communism or any total government system they all have ended up failing with very bad results. its not your
fault. the dept of education a communist manifesto point has trained you to be an obediant comrade sheeple. But do check out that movie I like to hear your take on it when they bring out facts that your so called GW scientist dont disclose everything.
I may be the first person to tell you this but steel melts. When it melts it weakens. No the fuel would not have been mosly gone. It burns the same way a shuttle burns it. The plane hit the building (that alone probably weakened the structure a shit load) then the jet fuel burned weakening it even more... The building then fell. Any building can be brought down that way. If the main support structure is compromised the whole thing falls apart. Basic engineering....
so your saying it melted concrete too. try to melt your barbeque pit with kerosene. then try to melt girders with a blow torch which burns hotter than kerosene which is what jet fuel is highly refined. and the main support is in the basement did the plane crashinto the basement.. Your logic fails.
It sure does. is the building mainly supported from the top or at the bottom. If there was no support up top the bottom wouldnt give. if the bottom had no support then the top would have no support. so if the support through the buildng failed then the bottom lost support. But the plane hit the top. Only solution was something other than the crash remove the bottom support. What theorectically could do that. Thermite! evidence of molten steel for 3 months both used in cutting steel and blasting
there are satilite views that show thermal heat in the building in the square shapes of the columns meaning those core columns were superheated way about what jet fuel could do. But thermite explains it. Check out the mythbusters thermate test where it exploded when they put ice under it.
Like I say if you find crap from a duck. It walks and talks like a duck. and if it got crushed by a falling building. Its still a duck. evidence unexplained means someone is hiding the truth. That the evidence is probable and mostly likely the cause. And if so who put it there? Then there is the ole saying who profited? The president, wallstreet, halliburton, military complex. Silverstein. Guillianni. Lots of crooks. Blame it on ragheads. Who most of supposed terrorist are alive and didnt die.
But your evidence is wrong. I have proved that. Independent sources have proved that. Liberals who hate bush proved that. Just cause they got lots of money from this dosent mean they did it. Thats all circumstantial. They just siezed the moment. I dont like Bush I think he and Dick are douches. But I wont blame them for somthing they obviously didnt do....
hows it wrong? they got there war. cheney didnt have to tell where the money went. all the contractors were funded. wallstreet collected on insurance all the banks in the building got fdic. silverstein got way more money than it cost for the buildings and he didnt have to spend a billion to retrofit the towers. the governement grew and our libertys were taken away and we pay for it. and the obama admin is the same bush admin as the same clinton admin . No one has been out of office.
I didnt say they didnt take advantage of the situation. But thats hardly proof they did 9/11. Are they ass monkeys for taking advantage of the situation? Yes. But that doesent mean they did it. Next Obama is diffrent from Bush. I didnt see Bush pushing a public option or energy reform. They may be the same on Iraq and Afg. But they hardly the same domesticly....
and how many promises has obama kept? none yet. he is still following bushes path. whats the difference? this public option and energy reform is a scam to governize those out of the private sector run them like the car company. check out the main points of the communist manifesto and tell me by that definition that we are not now a communist country. There is no left or right is total government and limited government.
sure but watch out for fire.......
MrPhattdirty 10 months ago
The fact that she was in Africa when he was born shows she dosent know. Republicans have confirmed his BC. Independants have confirmed it. Every media outlet has and even the republican govoner. Birthers dont care about the facts. They just want to discredit the first black president...
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Its not confirmed until the long form is shown. Thats been the whole argument.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Again messed up I was trying to say 3% of independances.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
I just noticed I screwed up in a post....
Ardipithecus 5.5-4.4 million years
Australopithecus 4-2 million years
Kenyanthropus 3-2.7 million years
Paranthropus 3-1.2 million years
Homo 2- present I didnt type it in right....
Again all transitional fossils.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Wheres the original creature that evolved from goo. This still doesnt show how we all of a sudden were on this planet. And alot of these are described to be more like chimps and apes.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
The first organism was single celled. You wont find it. Evolution does not state how life began it states how life changes. Abiogenusis states how life began. They are two diffrent theorys.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Thats what im talking about. Evolution and creationism are used to make claim on how intelligent life began on earth. Considering that plants and animals have totally different chromosome mappings and fossil records of existance. Both have shortfalls. But what would fill those short falls would be if we were colonized. We assume life exist elsewhere our planet could of been terraformed for us. Thats what we plan to do if we can get off of it onto anther one.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Thunderfoot explained clearly why its imposible. You just lack comprehention. If the grand canyon was formed in 5 mins the water would have to travel 5x the speed of sound. And you obviously know nothing about erosion. See dude you either need to stop lying about your 6 years in college or sue your college for incompantance
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Why would speed have to do with it? We are talking about an abundance of water that buried all land in a short time and ran off back into the deep. Sandstone errodes fast. If you flooded a high elevated desert and washed away the sand. you would have a canyon. Mudslides are no different and thats with moderate rain. Does thunderfoot take that into consideration?
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I inspected that column before it went up... when it was done being built in Canada
frojas1000 2 years ago
Oh yeah. Thunderfoot has over 60k subs. He also some videos of him debating ray comfort. This guy knows his shit. Every creationist thats called this fucker out he has utterly destroyed. And I am not saying that cause I like his views. Check out his videos and you will know what I mean.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
american's killers
pyromannx59 2 years ago
lol "One world" trade center.
dscglfr00 2 years ago
Comment removed
mejesus 2 years ago
Well I am tired so If you post a comment I wont get back to it till tomorrow.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
After they are done building this, I hope the israelis and americans don't fly planes into again. They will probably come up with something more diabolical this time.
thestraybullet 2 years ago
If you dont have anything intelligent to say please STFU.....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
intelligence doesnt seem to be your forte.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
warcraft1920 -ah, the old "STFU" response. Telling someone to shut up is the best technique. Why bother with a counter argument?
If the media reported on a huge isreali spy ring operating within US borders, would you believe it?
A huge spy ring was broken up and the western media barely covered it. Instead the focus is on the "ragheads."
The "official" story is the governments "theory" on what happened.
thestraybullet 2 years ago
If many sources confirmed it I would. But that hardly proves anything. All of that is circumstantial. If we uncovored a Brittish spy ring does that mean they did 9/11. You sound like an anti-semetic to me.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Ah, the old Israeli spy ring claim. It probabely wasn't covered because it was a bunch of bull.
911myths(dot)com/html/israeli_art_student_spies
TheAntiV 2 years ago
TheAntiV, it was not covered because our media outlets are run by pussies. Major western media outlets have been infiltrated by zionists(pussies).
thestraybullet 2 years ago
Nah, I think the "bull" explanation is a lot more realistic. I mean if you consider the link in my comment above.
TheAntiV 2 years ago
lol yeah like drop the ISS station on it. Then blast it with the SDI sattelite.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Lastly on the CO2 part. Go to a scientist and tell him co2 isent whats causing global warming. And he will laugh at you....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
show me a real scientist that would admit that with credentials. And i'll have him rewrite chemistry and biology courses in existance that say otherwise.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Umm like every scientist says co2 is causing GW. I mean I dont know how to explain it its like explaining how a pencil works. Its so obvious. Why is Venus hotter then Murcury yet farther from the sun? Its cause Venus has an atmosphere full of CO2 that traps heat.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Well then lets define what creates heat. Pressure and friction. Without pressure you have a vaccum(cold) doesnt matter what the gas is. its compression of molecules. This is how a/c works. We have barometric pressure which stays fairly consistant. when its high we have heat when its low we have cold. High and lows. doesnt matter if theres co2 nitrogen or oxygen tempertures a relation of pressure. seasons change not because of co2 its always hot in summer and cold in winter.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
this baloney science blaming man and only charging americans a co2 tax is a scam it doesnt do anything but make more bueracracy and pay gore and control people. its false crap.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Yeah yeah thats what you people say about Evolution. Question? Why are you people so anti-science? 99% of scientist say man is cause for GW yet you ignore it and say they are wrong. 99.9% of scientist say evolution is a fact yet 60% of rightys say they are wrong....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
actually evolution and creationism are both theorys neither can be proven. as with 99% scientist i doubt that. theres a league of scientist that sued al gore for purjury. With a list of thousands of scientist that have signed petitions saying its bullshit.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
OMG Evolution has already been proven. And yes 99% of scientist believe in evolution. Go to any scientific forum and present anything that goes against evolution and you will be laughed out that room. I would like to see this list please present it. There is no professor at my college that would ever say evolution is BS. I did make my arguments logicly. You just wont except them. Your like the moon landing deniers or the birthers.. You wont except it.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
If there are plausable alternate circumstances that fits the same logic and the end result would answer all questions then that would be the most likely truth. As with evolution which came first the egg or the chicken? You cant prove it. As with birthers. show the long form why no transparency? As with the moon why cant any telescopes show the landing site with the moon buggys. We have satilites that can read the print your newspaper. Curious eh? you assume with no proof and except it.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Evolution has already been proven and tested. Its fact. Every biology book says its fact. If evolution was not fact all our cures would be uselss. And many are becoming usless because of people like you. Obama has already shown his BC. You people wont except it no matter what he does. Probably because hes black. So you are also a moon lander denier. Jesus I bet you also believe the royal family is made up of reptiles from another world. You people are so pathetic. I feel sorry for you.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
No. evolution has not been proven it has been theorized. they have not found fossils with dna or chromosone patterns that show evolution of man or complex life forms from goo. Cures have nothing to do with evolution. there are two types of birth certificates he has not that official one. And it has nothing to do with because he is black it has to do with law. They had congressional meetings about mccain because he was born in panama had to vote him as a citizen. However because of the date
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
and the laws at that time and that both his parents were not americans and that in discovery there is conflict of storys. All he has to show is his long form. He has locked it down as with all his school records. People who hide stuff are usually guilty of something. Wouldnt you like to know why he preaches transparency and doesnt want it to apply with him. I smell a rat and it should be published. He is our president and should be honest.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Only one of your parents need to be American when you are born. And you need to be born on American soil which he was. He hasent locked down anything. Its a law in Hawaii not to give out the origianl BC. Yes he can fail because the bill still needs to pass the house and senate. All he can do is either sign it or veto it. He cant make it pass the senate or house. I can find 1000 scientist. Name one and I WILL give you 1000. Sweaden and Japan are socialist nations and are amoung the richest...
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Its also law that he can release that info. Which he doesnt so he is still hiding it. There was a reward for any witness or hospitals to come forward. So they could adorn the birth place of obama. But none. His grandmother in kenya said she witnessed his birth in mambas. In which is territory of english rule under his dad. which makes him subject to that. His long form will prove his legitamacy. Swedan and japan are constitutional monarchys. And japan was sucking pretty hard in the 90's
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
First problem when Obama was born Mambasa was not part of kenya. It was part of Zanzibar. Second in that interview she corrected herself right after saying that and said he was born in Hawaii. I like how you omit that part. Like I said you dont care for facts. The king of sweaden and the emperor of Japan have no real power. They are just figure heads. Sweaden and Japan are classified as socialist nations. So is france and Germany also VERY rich nations....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Mombasa is the second largest city in Kenya, lying on coast Look it up. . ANd your saying the queen of england also has no power that she is just a figure head BS. The facts are going to be on his long form. so lets see the evidence. (facts) you dont care for the facts. And what does a rich nation mean?
? we subsidize these nations.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Yes Evolution has been proven. You still dont understand what a theory is " the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another." That means anything thats a theory has been PROVEN to be fact. Cures do have somthing to do with evolution. When we create a cure it is to kill the infection or virus. We have to keep changing that cure however. Because the bacteria or virus evolves an immunity to the cure. Obama has show what was required of all presidents.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
One definition of theory a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation b : an unproved assumption : conjecture
Without investigation its unproved. Without evidence it is conjecture. Theorys without proof cannot be stated as fact until you find or recreate the result. The bacteria is still a bacteria it is not evolving into a new life form with an IQ just adapting to its surrounding. and no obama hasn't
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
But it has evolved into a new life form. "In evolutionary theory, any population that adapts to cope with new challenges (such as antibiotics) will make trade-offs." Source: physorgdotcom/news104764947.html
warcraft1920 2 years ago
first of all anti bodies is what your body produces. There is no cure. Its exposure to a foreign organism that your body maps to attack. thats the idea. there fore your immune system evolves but that doesnt change its function. that is not what darwin evolution is about.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
watch?v=BS5vid4GkEY&feature=PlayList&p=AC3481305829426D&index=0
thats the first of many of Thunderfoots videos called "why people laugh at creationist" If you truly desire more knowledge and you want to see opposing views you wont be a bitch and you will check them out. I think he is a college professor of some kind. Lastly at the time of OBamas birth Mombasa was NOT part of kenya. It is now. But it was not then So its immposible he could have been born in both Mombasa and kenya.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
You are so retarded. LOOK at an atlas Mombasa is ia city in kenya on the coast. So yes.. He can be born in mombasa which is inside kenya. Are you saying you cant be born in a state if you born in a city inside it? You have this unbelievable pretzel logic. Im not a creationist nor into darwin both do not have enough evidence to prove either true. there is always another explaination.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Mombasa was NOT part of kenya in 1961 because it was part of a diffrent nation called Zanzibar in 1961. WTF is so hard to understand about that? Mombasa was a city inside of Zanzibar. Kenya annexed Mombasa in december 1961. Obama could not have been born in both Kenya and Mombasa. If he was born in Mombasa he would have been born in the country of Zanzibar.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Well mombasa is not part of zanzibar anymore is it? So all purposes he is born in kenya. If you told people that he was born in mombasa zanzibar they will never find it on a map now would they?
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Well sice he wasent born in either Mombasa or Kenya it dosent matter. Water cannot erode rock that fast. There is no evidance saying it can. It takes millions of years for it to happen. If rock could erode that fast we would have surly documented it by now. And new canyons would be forming all the time. Like dozens in a life time. If you can show me a time when a tsunami created somthing like the grade canyon in 5 mins I will gladly concead defeat. But you cant cause its never happened....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Well why would his grandmother at first show the hut and talk about his birth in kenya. THis will only be solved when he shows his original long form.
Well we havent had ice glaciers covering most of the earth so it hasnt happened in our lifetime but could of back then. There are more things then rocks that errode. sand, dirt ,mud. all wash away.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Why would his grandma say he was born in both Mombasa and Kenya? She obviously dosent know what shes talking about. He dosent need to prove anything to you. Most sane people believe him. In a recient poll 20% of republicans and 3% were not sure to believe. I would not be worried if I were him. And no it would not be solved even if he showed it. Its a conspiracy theory. Those NEVER die. people who believe this are just a bunch of rednecks pissed off cause their commander-in-chief is a black man
warcraft1920 2 years ago
No they are pissed off because our commander and chief is not change and a liar like bush. He might be a change on the administration name but the admin is the same people.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
No its about race watch?v=zRqcfqiXCX0 here is a Palin rally a couple months ago. His admin is diffrent hopefully. The fact he is trying to solve issues other politicians only talk about shows he is diffrent. Now if he backs down from this public option hell you can dis him all you want. It will show hes a pussy. But since I am not seeing that yet I will still support him. Evolution has facts behind it. That makes it diffrent from creation.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Boy your a fool. Everyone in his admin is wallstreet tycoons and chicago thugs. Are they black ..NOPE.. SO it has nothing to do with racism. IT has to do with more crooks and cronies and convicted felons. Everything has facts behind it the issue is no record of proof.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Well she is family and you would figure grandmas would know where thier grandbabies were born especially if you were there. Actually she only said he was born in mombasa. Everyone says kenya because that is where mombasa is in now.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I just watched that video. Thunderfoot gave no evidence to contridict why the grand cannon could of been made in 5 min. This planet was over 75%ice. we have citys that have been buried underwater. I can cut through dirt with a water hose. Imagine the power of an ocean through a mountain range. Is that a possiblity? yes. Well i checked your video out. Did you check my video out?
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
No it is not or we would have seen it over and over again. The grand canyon took millions of years to form. Water cant cut through rock like that. See your stumbling around like an idiot again. Your trying to defy the laws of physics. LOL Water cant cut rock the size of the grand canyon in 5 mins. Its impossible. And if it can show proof.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
No we wouldnt because we've only heard of one great world flood. And how do you think canyons are made numbnuts? And that little dinky river in the bottom is not big enough so it took something bigger and wider way back. A sunami size tidal wave can take out a city and buildings. 5 min is over exagsterbated. How about oh 40 days then. Water can do anything. We cut steel with it.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Water cant cut steel natuarly. Also the 40 days story isent real. The bibel says the flood covered the highest mountains. Umm theres not enough water in the world to do that. Even if you melt all the ice caps and brought every last drop from underground it would still not happen. Also the story of Noah is wrong to. A man cannot build a boat large enough to carry every animal. The story of the flood is just a myth. A tsumani cannot make a canyon. That goes against the laws of physics.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
And what if the canyons of the abyss were not there to displace water then there would be more water to cover land. And what if some sort of iceburg planetoid collided with earth and melted in the upper atmosphere. Its a possibility. So are you saying a river cant make a canyon?
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Well even if there were no canyons at the time (which is rediculous mostly because the oldest known record of human civilization has mentioned canyons) it would still not be enough. A planetoid sized icebur?. Come on think why that would be impossible. One, something that big hitting the earth would probably throw us off our axis like Uranus. If it didnt do that the force of it hitting the Earth would probebly shatter earth.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
We have an astroid belt between mars and jupiter according to mathematic harmonics that orbit should of had a planet. could pieces of it not of flung into our orbit and crash. We do have big asteroid craters on some parts of the earth. No one has explained what astronomical event killed the dinosaurs.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Number 1 that intelligence comment was not directed at you but at the guy who posted after you. Number 2 WTF are you talking about? CO2 dosent create heat. It traps it. Heat rays come from the sun that hit Earth.... Most are then reflected back into space..... With high amounts of Co2 it traps it on Earth. We have already seen it on Venus. And the average temp of Earth has been going up.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
NO c02 absorbs heat like ice absorbs heat after the heat is gone you have cold. C02 expands in heat or is released in heat. Take a block of dry ice.. CO2 and heat it up. the cold slows down the heat molecules and the gas is released pressure has droped. We hardly have shit in comparison of c02. the earth has been going up over the millenium because the sun has been going up. once it reaches critical mass then it will cool off and we will too. thats history and provable by climate evidence
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
99% of scientist disagree with you. Co2 is what keeps Venus so fucking hot. So I dont know what to tell you. Look at it from my shoes. I can either listen to the scientist who put a man on the moon or a youtube poster. No creation is not a theory. You people dont understand what a theory is. A theory is the highest point an hypotheisis can become. Gravity is a theory and so are thermodynamics. Creation is not There is 0 evidence for it....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
I'll debate any of those "99% scientist" laws of thermal dynmicals and pressure and the definition of heat proves it has nothing to do with co2. Even mars has c02 but man is not on there adding to it and its ice caps are melting. jupiters temperature gets hotter as you get closer to the surface its barometric pressure that retains heat by compressing atoms making friction. thermodyanamics is not a theory its a law of relation it can be proven an tested. if you want to blame something that seems
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
hot blame humidity, water vapor holds more heat than a gas. Its also a green house gas. thats why hot and humid is nasty and hot and dry is barable. As with theory with an hypothesis. How do you prove creation? Another probable hypothesis is we were probably dumped on this planet by aliens. Which would explain our all of a sudden existence. there are laws of gravity that is provable. Our planet according to science was 75% ice at one time and has been melting ever since. the source is exposure
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
is the sun in which light is coverted to heat by excited molecules under pressure which is friction. thats why when you are on the ground its warm and when you go to high elevations it gets colder because the pressure is less. mercury has no atmosphere so there is no pressure. vacuum of space. venus has tons of other gases you cant isolate co2 as an insulator of heat. its more conductive which disapates heat which means removes heat. So when tempertures rise c02 is released in relation/reaction
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Carbon Diaoxide is the reason for GW. couple that with deforestation you get the perfect storm. There are other gasses in venus atmosphere. But Carbon Dioxide is the one of the main gasses. With more Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere and less trees to filter it you get GW. Scientists say its fact. Corperations namly oil and car ones say its not. I wonder why?
warcraft1920 2 years ago
your so hung up on c02 that you ignore all science and laws of science. Lets look at it biology wise. C02 is necessary for plant and aquatic life. The more c02 the bigger crops, fruits and plants grow. Thats a fact. Trees do cool the planet by providing shade. They provide a barrier between the sun and ground. Some light is converted to heat and heat RISES up above trees into cold atmosphere where it is absorbed. When you stand on a hot plate you feel rising heat. At night without the sun
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
gases condense c02 is absorbed back into the waters trees and plants it is cyclic. algeas underwater plants grow and give off oxygen for the fish. Remember when the dangers of car exhaust was c0 (carbon monoxide) They still produce that. Eventually it does turn to c02 because charge of the molecule is polarized and bonds with free oxygen to balance it. Maybe your problem is that you dont have enough oxygen feeding your logic centers of your brain. or you just didnt learn it. which makes me more
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
of a scientist than you because i question everything and dont ignore evidence of conflicts and search for explanations that would be make everything fit and not just something convienient that goes against the rules. The truth is the sun is the source that creates excited electrons motion and the pressure of our atmosphere is what creates the atmospher of friction which creates heat. Either increasing the pressure or increasing the sun energy will create hotter output. Barometric pressure
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
never goes higher than a specific point. So that leaves the sun which also has a cyclic process which involves a heating and cooling period. So the end result the sun is the issue. And thats why all the icecaps are melting in the solar system. and eventually they will start freezing again. Its a long cycle to critical mass.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
All the science is on my side. There is a balancing act. And we humans are throwing it off. Trees keep the CO2 levels down by breathing in CO2. there is so much CO2 being pumped in the atmsphere and to little trees cause we are cutting them down. Again 99% of scientist agree with me. It is you who lacks the IQ. Its obvious you are also quoting right wing websites. I can tell Yesterday you were stumbling around like an idiot. Now I feel like I am reading a text book.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
So the problem is not c02. Its not enough trees to insulate our planet from radiating heat. C02 is just a result of heat. nature balances all. How am i quoting web sites? This is my education level of 6 years college. If i was stumbling probably because i was tired. ANd maybe you should read a text book because the bullshit you say the quote scientist are saying is not from a scientific textbook. Hopefully im opening logic centers for you. By using the laws of physics and nature to explain it.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
We never said it was just CO2. Its lots of reasons. What have I said that is not scientific? Examples? You say you have 6 years of college yet you keep getting the scientific def. of theory wrong You are either lying or you cheated your way through college. "a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation." Thats from your own post. Keywords: for the sake of argument. In the science world theorys are the closent you get to facts
warcraft1920 2 years ago
It only takes one unexplainable fact to destroy a theory. I can prove my aligations with experiments showing relations in pressure and temperture. With device we can measure atmospheric pressure. Where are your theorys or facts you just keep spouting 99% scientist say i am right. come on..
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
No it does not. There are many holes in evolution but that dosent disprove it. You keep saying I am wrong I have yet to see where. Tell me what I said that was wrong. Antibiotics is penicillin. Its made to destroy infections and what not. But these bacteria are starting to evolve to become immune to penicillin acroding to the "U.S journal of medicine." And this is exactly what darwin was talking about. Look up "thunderfoot" and "evirus" these guys do an awsome job of explaining this....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Fill the holes please without evidence of or facts or concepts of recreating it there is no proof.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Anything that kills a bacteria can be classified as an antibiotic. It doesnt destroy infections it kills the germ or bacterium that causes the infections. Infections heal once attacking diseases or objects are removed that disrupts immunity. Darwin says we evolved from apes. Apes are still here. there is no proof of that. The bacteria is still a bacteria even if it is stronger it didnt evolve into a new classification of lifeform. Thats the point.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
First of all evolution does not state we evolved from apes. It states humans and apes have a common ancestor. Please pick up a biology book. So much for that 6 years in college you had. And yes bacteria has evolved into new life forms. They have tested it in a lad and proved it. This is what I am talking about. You know nothing about evolution and you make grade school mistakes yet you try to argue against it.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Okay then.. Whats the common ancestor that makes us cousins to apes Where is that proof? SHOW ME You can't it doesnt exist. And what proof of a bacteria evolving into a new life form you cant bacterias are still bacterias. You have no proof of evolution that man evolved from primordial goo. That in fossil records we just showed up one day and there were no other indications before that. Thats the whole point. Thats where you get the division of evolutionist vs creationist.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Oh I cant? Here it is in order.
Ardipithecus 5.54.4 million years
Australopithecus 42 million years
Kenyanthropus 32.7 million years
Paranthropus 31.2 million years
Homo 2 present
This is our evolutionary path. All of these are transitional fossils and have been found. Like I said its already been proven.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Look Osama!
They're gonna put a bullseye on it for us this time!
696styx 2 years ago
I love how he said "hopefully we can come bad and see it again" does this mean this WTC will be attached again?
AZDACKSGaming 2 years ago
yay! this wont be completed until 2018! woohoo.
KOFILMSANDMEDIA 2 years ago
The report that said it won't be completed until 2018 was false. The building will top out in 2011.
ebola111 2 years ago
is this one will collapse if airlane crash in it?
supercashgirl 2 years ago
Although the WTC towers were in fact designed to withstand being struck by an airplane, the resultant fires weakened the infrastructure of the building, collapsing the upper floors and creating too much load for the lower floors to bear. Shortly after the attack, both towers collapsed. hopefully, there have been changes made in new buildings. and, of course , secuity is much tighter now.
jnycnuk 2 years ago
Well anyone who saw the floorplans and the videos of the steel cage outter structure would question why the outside would collapse like that especially outward over 60 mph. Of course there is the satilite thermol view which you can see rectangles in the middle of the building, super heated and the only thing glowing, concentrated fire on the columns only? Doesnt show heat anywhere else. ITs fishy.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
you stupid french fries boy. do you really think that 2 airplanes crashed into the 2 buildings & caused them to collapsed in 9/11? if you dont know chemistry, engineering architect, gravity, physics, then don't bullshit about terrorism that caused this to happened. just remember, americans STILL dont know where is Osama binladen.or this guy a fiction?
LU29UN99 2 years ago
The smartest people in the country seem to disagree with you. So it would seem physics is on my side. I find it funny how right wingers are going to try to use science against me. People who deny evolution and global warming, even though they have been proven are going to use science against me? LOL
warcraft1920 2 years ago
global warming may be apparent but the proof that co2 is the cause is quite unscientific.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
One World Trade Centre adhears strikingly scary.
BRANSCOMBEx 2 years ago
Yeah im amazed they didnt call it One world order trade center.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
USA All The Way!!!!
jaowseph 2 years ago 3
Eh, no.
JLP228 2 years ago
That's one small step for the construction crew, one giant wait for mankind.
BinkieMcFartnuggets 2 years ago
8 years to put up a column awesome.
twells2323 2 years ago 3
F ap f the us government f neocons and others bring down the wtc 1,2, & 7.
I don't care if you think 9/11 wasn't an inside job....thats your damn denial and ignorance.
Building a new tower over those dead bodies without answering vital questions -to sercure my land- is treason.
My government got away with murder
mejesus 2 years ago
Fuck you for complaining on youtube and doing nothing about it. You're part of the problem.
elspoko 2 years ago
No, I have been in the court system giving my redress of grievances and I dont pay the fed income tax nor any other Governmental revenue besides the state sales tax.
mejesus 2 years ago
Havent learned yet i hope they encapsulate it so no one can put thermite on it in later dates.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Another 9/11 truther. You people are so annoying.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
YOur a fn tool
mejesus 2 years ago
I wear a tinfoil hat to keep the chemtrails out.
AirPhforce 2 years ago
You're a tool.
mejesus 2 years ago
And your a fact denier. Because rational thought makes your brain hurt and you rather stick your head in the ground because basic physics was to hard for you in school.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Like what facts. Lets see them. Your just another Ron Paul loser. You people are a fucking cult.....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
I can honestly say Ron Paul was right. The fact you voted for a fascist government notes that you want mommy to run your life. Grow up little kid. or troll
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
OMG you are so fucking retarded. Fascism is governing using race or religion. You idiots dont even know the meaning of the words you use. Obama is not governing by race or religion. Fascism is right wing idiology genius. Ron Paul is closer to that then anyone. Anyone who saw 2 fucking planes crash into the buildings know it was the planes. Oh but I forgot theres no way a plane loaded with thousends of gallons of jet fuel could bring down a building. Its not fishy its logic.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
NO. Fascism is when corporations and governements get in bed with each other. BUt as with race... yeah since you liberals are so into calling everyone racist whos against obamas administration i guess race is part of it.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
No. Here is the def of fascism. " a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader." Facsism is right wing idiology not left.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Sounds like obama to me.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
If Obama sounds like a fascist to you then you are an idiot. It dosent need to melt concrete just the steel. Without the steel it fails. If it didnt need the steel we wouldnt use now would we?
warcraft1920 2 years ago
the building was combination of steel and reinforced concrete you should look at the video of the making of the wtc
the floors are 1 foot thick concrete slabs with tons of steel rebar. The truss they show that supposedily gave away was only used to hold the frames while the concrete cured. they could of been all removed and the floors would of still been attached to the outside columns.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
lol. People dont just get access to vital parts of the building. If it were that easy the 1993 bombing would have been more sucsessful. They have companies they hire. I dont think you understand how much explosives it would have taken. It takes and entire team of men and thousends of dollars in explosives to demolish buildings 1/10th WTC size.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Why dont you understand why we believe it was an inside job? And our government does have this capability. That like bush has shown he can spit on the constitution and do what he likes. That he can threaten like obama is doing now to senators bullying bullshit legislation. That undermines our economy and freedoms.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I think you believe this 9/11 BS because you want to not because of evidence. The same reason some people say evolution didnt happen. there is a mountain of evidence saying it did yet they ignore it.... You are acting out of emotion not logic. And trust me is Obama was bulling people you would know it. Right now hes being to soft.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
well since you cant explain the evidence and logically make it all work together makes your theory unsound. You claim mountains of evidence yet there is none. Logic in the wtc would say a fire wouldnt bring 3 buildings down perfectly in a demolitioned fashion. yet you believe that. come on now. whos acting on emotion and not logic? Maybe you should watch all the videos i see of obama and vlogs of senators. His demanding. and threating passage of bill or else.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Okay so what plane hit building 7? And the planes wouldnt of been completely full of fuel. and the fuel would of been mostly gone in the explosion. the fuel burn was upstairs so how did that bring the rest down. You forget the whole outside stucture is tube steel welded to each other side to side with an inner core of steel columns if the floors gave out the outside structure would remain. Dust samples were analyzed and found commercial grade thermite (patented)
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
planes may of hit it but it was explosives that brought it down.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
First of all link the source that says we found commercial grade thermite in the dust. I would love to read were you got that. Do you realize how much explosives it would take to bring down the main support? In a building no 2 buildings with THOUSENDS of people going in and out. Think about how do you weld? By melting and fusing the atoms together.... Using a hand tool. Its not a streach that a plane loaded with fuel that blasts shuttles to low earth orbit could do it to.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
/watch?v=2tAlqZe6Y3g
these girders were not welded but bolted. but an aluminum plane supposidley sliced through steel. Yet they were bits of metal after it was was over. Take a bird cage and knock a hole in it does it fall. No the rest of the cage supports it. that is the design of the tower with an inner core. as with taking out the core you just have to have access to the elevators shafts. people could be rigging things in the elevators shafts claiming they are network engineers hidden view.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
It dosent matter if it was bolted or welded. It still melts at the same temp. Aluminum is acually really strong. Remember the ISS is built from it. It has to with stand small rocks hitting it at 17k MPH. There are a couple of problems with your bird cage analogy. First is mass. The WTC has far more of it fighting gravity. Second is tensil strength. WTC has to support far more weight. Third is material..... The WTC was hit by a jet carrying jetfuel.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
aluminum is not stronger than steel and i can guarantee that there is other metals like titanium used on that ISS. When they designed the WTC they used 20 times the steel to be sure that it wouldnt fall. It was designed to take 8 aircraft hits and still stand by the engineers notes. Heres another fallacy in your logic. as the towers fell all the debris was going up and to the side there fore the weight of the building was getting lighter on the lower structure which supported heavier loads.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I never said aluminum was stronger then steel.. But its not weak. And the ISS is made mosly over aluminum. Its to hard to blast anything else up there. Obama has kept promises. Guantonimo bay is one. And public option is another. We are not now a communist country. In communism you have a single leader we dont have that. In communism there is no free market we have the biggest free market in the world. PLease understand communism before saying it.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
He hasnt kept it yet. they are adding to it. Havent you been watching the news. Public option and all is still in debate. Isnt obama our president a single leader? How can we have a free market when government subsidizes and creates monopolys and owns business. we have not had a free market in ages. Obama also said he would get out of the wars. that was a lie off the bat. no change more of the status quo. now health care is going to be government run. Shit we have czars now. how more soviet?
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
The fact that hes trying shows us that he does intend to keep that promise. So if he fails at the public option are you going to call him a lier. I bet you will cause he failed even thoguh he tried. And no we do not have a single leader. Power is divided between the house, senate and Presdient. He never said he would get us out of Afg. Go look again and he is pulling out of Iraq.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Well he cant fail because he has the power of veto and final sayso. Well maybe you havent been watching our system of governmet because none of them are balancing each other. all the power is going to the executive with consent lobbist and corporations seem to be running the show and obama is making deal privately with pharma in the background. So who is running this country? Its an oligarch. every government has one. dictators, socialism communism, fascism, all. he's leaving a force in iraq.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Heres another interesting thought. Meterologist pretty much accurately forecast the weather. they dont go
counting c02 content to do it. they measure high and low pressures and map wind streams.
Check this movie out google
global warming or global governance. Here are the scientist that say its bs and they explain it very logically. You judge.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Meterolgists are also wrong 50% of the time. For every ONE scientist you can find thats against GW I can find 1000 saying hes wrong. See this shows me you dont care for the facts. Also your right. Government run Healthcare is socialism. But I dont care. I would rather have a healthy strong socialist nation then a weak sick one that lets corperations run our lives...
warcraft1920 2 years ago
Meterolist seem to know the lows and highs everyday and they are accurate.
bold statement if you think you can find 1000 scientist. I've showed you the facts and some of the variables it is you that ignores logic that is taught or was taught. We have gone from one of the most educated to the dumbest countrys in 50 years. If you knew your history you wouldnt be praising socialism or communism or any total government system they all have ended up failing with very bad results. its not your
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
fault. the dept of education a communist manifesto point has trained you to be an obediant comrade sheeple. But do check out that movie I like to hear your take on it when they bring out facts that your so called GW scientist dont disclose everything.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I may be the first person to tell you this but steel melts. When it melts it weakens. No the fuel would not have been mosly gone. It burns the same way a shuttle burns it. The plane hit the building (that alone probably weakened the structure a shit load) then the jet fuel burned weakening it even more... The building then fell. Any building can be brought down that way. If the main support structure is compromised the whole thing falls apart. Basic engineering....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
so your saying it melted concrete too. try to melt your barbeque pit with kerosene. then try to melt girders with a blow torch which burns hotter than kerosene which is what jet fuel is highly refined. and the main support is in the basement did the plane crashinto the basement.. Your logic fails.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
The main support goes up through the whole building.
warcraft1920 2 years ago
It sure does. is the building mainly supported from the top or at the bottom. If there was no support up top the bottom wouldnt give. if the bottom had no support then the top would have no support. so if the support through the buildng failed then the bottom lost support. But the plane hit the top. Only solution was something other than the crash remove the bottom support. What theorectically could do that. Thermite! evidence of molten steel for 3 months both used in cutting steel and blasting
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
there are satilite views that show thermal heat in the building in the square shapes of the columns meaning those core columns were superheated way about what jet fuel could do. But thermite explains it. Check out the mythbusters thermate test where it exploded when they put ice under it.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
Like I say if you find crap from a duck. It walks and talks like a duck. and if it got crushed by a falling building. Its still a duck. evidence unexplained means someone is hiding the truth. That the evidence is probable and mostly likely the cause. And if so who put it there? Then there is the ole saying who profited? The president, wallstreet, halliburton, military complex. Silverstein. Guillianni. Lots of crooks. Blame it on ragheads. Who most of supposed terrorist are alive and didnt die.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
But your evidence is wrong. I have proved that. Independent sources have proved that. Liberals who hate bush proved that. Just cause they got lots of money from this dosent mean they did it. Thats all circumstantial. They just siezed the moment. I dont like Bush I think he and Dick are douches. But I wont blame them for somthing they obviously didnt do....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
hows it wrong? they got there war. cheney didnt have to tell where the money went. all the contractors were funded. wallstreet collected on insurance all the banks in the building got fdic. silverstein got way more money than it cost for the buildings and he didnt have to spend a billion to retrofit the towers. the governement grew and our libertys were taken away and we pay for it. and the obama admin is the same bush admin as the same clinton admin . No one has been out of office.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago
I didnt say they didnt take advantage of the situation. But thats hardly proof they did 9/11. Are they ass monkeys for taking advantage of the situation? Yes. But that doesent mean they did it. Next Obama is diffrent from Bush. I didnt see Bush pushing a public option or energy reform. They may be the same on Iraq and Afg. But they hardly the same domesticly....
warcraft1920 2 years ago
and how many promises has obama kept? none yet. he is still following bushes path. whats the difference? this public option and energy reform is a scam to governize those out of the private sector run them like the car company. check out the main points of the communist manifesto and tell me by that definition that we are not now a communist country. There is no left or right is total government and limited government.
Squirelbutt 2 years ago