The time spent on something does not equal the quality. Just because someone spent years on something does not automatically make it good. The opposite is also true, someone may work on a piece for only a handful of moments and yet it may still be wonderful and important. It is perfectly alright not to like this video... That said, do not dismiss it because it looks as if it were thought up quickly.
To really appreciate this work for what it is, you need to be not only educated but fascinated by the context of a very specific type of performance art of a specific time in modern art history. If you're one of those people, more power to you.. but there were artists of that period who really made some powerful work that stood the test of time. Vito Acconci for example... mops the floor with this guy.
Though I'm, admittedly, not the greatest connoisseur of art, I'm pretty impressed of Bruce Nauman and his work. I first "met" him at The Menil in Houston in late 2007 and was really amazed how such seemingly stupid and simple things like "D-E-A-D", "GetOutOfThisRoom", "Bouncing in the corner" or his sculptures, considered as one unit, evoke an understanding when "digested"...really impressive.
"I'll make a film of myself walking about the perimeter of a square, and call it art. Let those 'in the know' struggle to find meaning in it. I'll have a great laugh at what they come up with!"
cool can you upload that? I'd love to 'find meaning' in your work.. finding meaning isnt a 'struggle' either, it is interesting and thought provoking. You'd understand if you appreciated this kind of work. Maybe you're more into image-based work.
Either way I'm sure other people too would like to see a new walking in an exaggerated manner around the perameters of a square.
we're looking at this piece in my art culture class right now. im starting to draw the line between whats GOOD art and whats something you can think of and make in your garage in 2 minutes that would require an enormous amount of imagination and speculation to derive any sort of significance from it, (eg, this video). thanks for putting this up, though :D
a lot of people don't really get it, and that's understandable. it helps to look at it in the context of the rest of his work, see how he uses his body in different pieces. i honestly didn't get bruce nauman until i saw an excellent retrospective at the menil in houston -- then it clicked
Art that you throw together in 2 minutes is most likely going to be better than something you slave over. Slaving over a piece of work might suggest that you are playing the most mundane card in the book. Technicality.
@dragonslayer91 you should think about this/his work in the context of the time he made it. he's questioning so many things in this- film as a medium, position of the body in the room, perspective. he's not telling anything, which wasnt in film these days. all informations are given from the beginning (title, etc). so smallest things become important, like mistakes he's making, movements and so on. in one work he does what others cant do in their whole career.
I see this work as Nauman representing the artists intent to challenge ways we visually percieve space. Is this the intent of the peice, or am I reading too much into it?
I think its just what the title says.... 'exaggeration' is used almost as a form of satire to give a kind of hyper-realistic insight on something.... even something as mundane as how people walk
yeah i think its about space and time as well. also something to do with bridging the gap between high art and low art.- questioning what art is- proving that art is anything that an artist wants it to be.
Clearly you have never studied Conceptual art or took the time to understand the motivation behind this work. Unfortunately you just made yourself look naive and uneducated. Word of advice, don't open your mouth if you know shit all. It's easy to hide behind your screen and judge, but I can assure you that you have contributed nothing worthwhile to art--Nauman's works are clearly too complex a thought for you to grasp.
i think it's brilliant
ekeimsleid 1 month ago
at the heights of his moral nihilizm he must be thankful for his wifes cornel connections greatfully he is a byproduct of wallstreet
artregeous 2 months ago
Remember you students that saw this in class, you technically /paid/ to see this.
Jewpinator 2 months ago
Comment removed
Jewpinator 2 months ago
what do you feel in your joints when you walk? ever pondered that?
uckfyocouch 7 months ago
Somebody should report this guy to the MInistry of Silly Walks.
jamisondavid100 8 months ago 4
hennessy was right, he does look like a peacock on mdma.
jasonyore 8 months ago
perche camina in questo modo?
Misszhuiyisishui 9 months ago
The most influential artist of the last 30 years.
nbproductions 10 months ago
The time spent on something does not equal the quality. Just because someone spent years on something does not automatically make it good. The opposite is also true, someone may work on a piece for only a handful of moments and yet it may still be wonderful and important. It is perfectly alright not to like this video... That said, do not dismiss it because it looks as if it were thought up quickly.
madawanow 11 months ago
he could at least have choosen a nice setting...
AMPFEAST 11 months ago
my favourite bit is where he walks
nel0405 1 year ago 22
i understand it, but still hate it
DougBDIT 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
To really appreciate this work for what it is, you need to be not only educated but fascinated by the context of a very specific type of performance art of a specific time in modern art history. If you're one of those people, more power to you.. but there were artists of that period who really made some powerful work that stood the test of time. Vito Acconci for example... mops the floor with this guy.
andrewweis 1 year ago
Comment removed
andrewweis 1 year ago
I suppose that it is what it is...isn´t it ?
JeanEmar3 1 year ago
Looks like he has worms =D
Jashfish 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a fag
Lem0n12 1 year ago 5
Though I'm, admittedly, not the greatest connoisseur of art, I'm pretty impressed of Bruce Nauman and his work. I first "met" him at The Menil in Houston in late 2007 and was really amazed how such seemingly stupid and simple things like "D-E-A-D", "GetOutOfThisRoom", "Bouncing in the corner" or his sculptures, considered as one unit, evoke an understanding when "digested"...really impressive.
weyrauch 1 year ago
"I'll make a film of myself walking about the perimeter of a square, and call it art. Let those 'in the know' struggle to find meaning in it. I'll have a great laugh at what they come up with!"
japan314 2 years ago
@japan314 lol agreed. if i ever did a video like this, itd be mocked by everyone
sonicfan287 1 year ago 2
cool can you upload that? I'd love to 'find meaning' in your work.. finding meaning isnt a 'struggle' either, it is interesting and thought provoking. You'd understand if you appreciated this kind of work. Maybe you're more into image-based work.
Either way I'm sure other people too would like to see a new walking in an exaggerated manner around the perameters of a square.
bigredfactory 1 year ago
i get it.......
firegirl99 2 years ago
Not too sure what this is about, but its making me think a lot.
TheIncredibleBAGMAN 2 years ago
we're looking at this piece in my art culture class right now. im starting to draw the line between whats GOOD art and whats something you can think of and make in your garage in 2 minutes that would require an enormous amount of imagination and speculation to derive any sort of significance from it, (eg, this video). thanks for putting this up, though :D
dragonslayer91 2 years ago
a lot of people don't really get it, and that's understandable. it helps to look at it in the context of the rest of his work, see how he uses his body in different pieces. i honestly didn't get bruce nauman until i saw an excellent retrospective at the menil in houston -- then it clicked
emvergeoning 2 years ago 5
That was one of the most memorable exhibits I've seen in my life.
something0something 2 years ago
@dragonslayer91
Art that you throw together in 2 minutes is most likely going to be better than something you slave over. Slaving over a piece of work might suggest that you are playing the most mundane card in the book. Technicality.
richardsellears 10 months ago
@dragonslayer91 you should think about this/his work in the context of the time he made it. he's questioning so many things in this- film as a medium, position of the body in the room, perspective. he's not telling anything, which wasnt in film these days. all informations are given from the beginning (title, etc). so smallest things become important, like mistakes he's making, movements and so on. in one work he does what others cant do in their whole career.
sonofdistress 1 month ago
I had to share this with my friends...
mindwentblank 2 years ago
I really don`t understand it...
zmizzy 2 years ago
I see this work as Nauman representing the artists intent to challenge ways we visually percieve space. Is this the intent of the peice, or am I reading too much into it?
Mcrankfan 2 years ago
I think its just what the title says.... 'exaggeration' is used almost as a form of satire to give a kind of hyper-realistic insight on something.... even something as mundane as how people walk
Nmbrz 2 years ago
it's really interesting actually... its like he's challenging nature itself, making fun of the human anatomy
Nmbrz 2 years ago
yeah i think its about space and time as well. also something to do with bridging the gap between high art and low art.- questioning what art is- proving that art is anything that an artist wants it to be.
grumpyvampire 2 years ago 2
for those haters that dont know. Bruce Nauman is epic.
pues13 2 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so gay!
dani3l4 2 years ago
So offensive of you!
kingreich22 2 years ago
poo pants! he poohed his pant
teamcrumb 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is art ??!! it discusts me thatpeople make a living of such shit when children are starving
ronniekray1984 2 years ago
and i'm sure you're in the peace corps, because otherwise, there's no explanation for such self-righteous ignorance.
bluepaperplane 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nothing ignorant about what ive got to say if yuo take pleasure from watching this you need a social life
ronniekray1984 2 years ago
Comment removed
markart5 2 years ago
Comment removed
markart5 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so what do YOU do for a living while children are starving?
rindich 2 years ago
this is tedious. but that''s what bruce's work is all about
theHungryWizard 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
gay bastard
berlin45ers 3 years ago
Wonderful, but I'm looking for your slantstep.
herzhaven 3 years ago
Ministry of Silly Walks
lemmycaution12 3 years ago 4
@lemmycaution12 you're right ,python did this years before.
robertrobin10 10 months ago
when you can't do something, do nothing, but tell people you did something. this man is a cunt
crimplemania 3 years ago
Clearly you have never studied Conceptual art or took the time to understand the motivation behind this work. Unfortunately you just made yourself look naive and uneducated. Word of advice, don't open your mouth if you know shit all. It's easy to hide behind your screen and judge, but I can assure you that you have contributed nothing worthwhile to art--Nauman's works are clearly too complex a thought for you to grasp.
gallanaa 2 years ago 5
I agree with you. completely. which is why i'd like to ask your pov on this piece in particular. im pretty lost here. :(
aomoustafa88 2 years ago
;D yeah you're right!
Auronjecht 2 years ago
"Okay, Bruce, enough of that - on to the breathalizer!"
manwithnoname123 3 years ago 5
fabuloso
dsantanilla 3 years ago