It's pronounced G-new? I have always been pronouncing it with a silent G. Also, the copypasta IS relevant to the show, so it's not necessarily "trolling". More like a community injoke is read on the air. .
The term “intellectual property” carries a hidden assumption—that the way to think about all these disparate issues is based on an analogy with physical objects, and our conception of them as physical property.
When it comes to copying, this analogy disregards the crucial difference between material objects and information: information can be copied and shared almost effortlessly, while material objects can't be.
Publishers and lawyers like to describe copyright as “intellectual property”—a term also applied to patents, trademarks, and other more obscure areas of law. These laws have so little in common, and differ so much, that it is ill-advised to generalize about them. It is best to talk specifically about “copyright,” or about “patents,” or about “trademarks.”
@guessmynamen00b So you have autism and you are faggot... How nice to hear that you are so...
Next time you (and your friends) know something about monolithic kernels and operating systems history, you can contribute something nice. Something different on that time.
I don't really see this as trolling. The debate in itself is valid, from both sides of the table, i.e. Linus really IS only a kernel, not a complete operating system, and the GNU project has indeed existed for much longer already than Linux in itself. On the other hand "GNU/Linux" or "GNU+Linux" is inpallatable in verbal communiation - it'll do well enough in writing. Stallman proposed calling the whole system LiGNUx, but Torvalds refused. So it's a great OS with a bad name. ;-)
@TheFri13 I have never said that Linux is a microkernel. It's a monolithic kernel, and the GNU native kernel, the Hurd, was intended to be a microkernel but has so far still not reached a usable state. The fact of the matter however remains that Linux is a kernel (and ONLY a kernel) and that the rest of the operating system comes from the GNU project. Both GNU and Linux deserve credit but neither should claim ALL credit.
@AragornCF You said it directly. Microkernel is not OS, it is just part of the OS. Monolithic kernel is the OS, not part of the OS. The OS architecture is different, two most used architectures are monolithic and server-client. There is as well a layered archicture as well. None of the GNU software (execluding HURD, GRUB) work without OS.. HURD is not kernel but OS. HURD's kernel is GNU Mach (and L4). Linux is name for the OS and only for such. Not a name for software system.
@TheFri13 [1/2] My friend, you are so very wrong on so many things. A kernel is not an operating system, whether it concerns a microkernel or a monolithic kernel. The kernel is the part of the OS that runs in the processor's highest privilege mode - i.e. ring 0 - while an operating system comprises of a kernel AND a userland (which runs in ring 3). You cannot do anything with a kernel only. You need at least a shell, etc.
[2/2] The difference between a monolithic kernel and a microkernel is that a microkernel only runs a small part of its code in ring 0 - e.g. process scheduling, memory management - whereas a monolithic kernel contains lots of other code as well, e.g. hardware drivers, filesystem and security, et al.. In Mach/Hurd, that other code is run from userspace via a server set. That said, GRUB does not run on Linux or any other OS; it's a mini-OS all by itself.
@AragornCF Monolithic kernel has all the OS functions in it. The Server-Client OS has separated the OS to own protected processes what all are running in supervisor mode but can be running in different or same address space. Servers actions are just limited to microkernel. tinyurl . com / ngarn8
Bash, GCC, glibc and all other userspace softwares needs a OS under them. Without OS none of those will work.
tinyurl . com / 3uaq48 (that just for if you understand basic logic based technology)
@TheFri13 I'm afraid that it is you who does not understand basic technology, my friend. You really need to look up on the meaning of the word "kernel". A kernel, whether monolithic, microkernel, exokernel or whatever, is NOT the entire operating system. The kernel is the part of the operating system which runs in ring 0 of the processor, period. An operating system must consist of a kernel AND a userland, i.e. a shell, a toolchain and libraries. With Linux alone, you can't do anything.
@AragornCF Kernel was the synonym for the OS definition. Others were "Core, Nucleos, Supervisor, Master Program" and so on. The kernel was the OS when all OS's were monolithics. When the Server-Client architecture was developed, the OS was not anymore just a kernel but microkernel + servers. So other name (OS) became a "standard". You do not use OS directly anyway. But you did not even check those university books and scientifical papers?
@AragornCF It is very wierd that you can not even understand that shell, libraries and so on can not operate without the OS. There are few OS architectures and monolithic is one of them. You are still thinking Linux is like a microkernel, just a part of the OS.
@TheFri13 Dude, I have tried to explain things to you in a courteous manner. You have this weird preconception of what an operating system is and what it consists of, and in addition you also have weird preconceptions about my intellectual abilities. If you're familiar with Wikipedia, then I would suggest taking a look at it because it explains things quite adequately. Please don't bother replying. This debate is not amusing anymore.
@AragornCF You are trying to understand OS technology from user perspective. I talk from it by historical and scientifical bases. How the OS works, how and why there are different architectures. Wikipedia confirms that I am right (=Linux kernel is monolithic and it is a OS alone). And still you can not give counter argue about my links what proofs I am right and you are wrong. You are referring that even OS developers like Andrew S.Tanenbaum does not know what the OS is.
You can find hundreds of the computer science books what explains that monolithic kernel is the whole OS. While microkernel is just part of the OS and the servers (modules) are needed to company it to get working OS. HURD is OS what use GNU Mach or L4 microkernel. HURD is not a kernel but a Server-Client OS.
Linux is monolithic kernel what makes it whole OS. It is modular where modularity is in binary level but not in architecture level.
@AragornCF a) Monolithic kernel is the first and original (and still used) OS architecture. b) You do not need shell at all. You do not need any UI done by software. The hardware is UI as well. Like in embedded systems where Linux is used very much because there is need for very stable and fast OS. You can have elevetors where the UI is buttons and LED's are the screen or voice ouput is giving the info.
c) You know how to use tinyurl com / mum9x ? And that is just very very short.
@TheFri13 Lastly, an operating system always needs a userland so that it can be used. Linux is supplied by Torvalds & friends as a kernel only, but you also need the GNU libc, GNU Bash (or another shell), the GNU Core Utilities and some other stuff before you've got a workable OS. X11 is not a requirement, but just about every Linux-based OS uses the GNU toolchain and utilities (and Linux, the kernel, is developed for that), while on the other hand GNU can be used with many other kernels.
@YetAnotherBadYT While there are some GNU tools in BSD, the majority of the various BSD operating systems does not come from GNU. BSD does not use GCC or Glibc, and its kernel certainly doesn't come from GNU either. There IS however a GNU/kFreeBSD system (FreeBSD kernel and GNU userland), and a GNU/kNetBSD and GNU/kOpenBSD, and there even is a GNU/kOpenSolaris (called "NexentaOS"), albeit that there has been some dispute over the licenses as GNU is GPL and the OpenSolaris kernel is CDDL.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
You all have a really loose definition of trolling. He sent a letter to a radio show whose hosts were unfamiliar with the meme and they had brief, even-tempered discussion on air about how about how it's formally correct and that they acknowledge the contributions of the GNU project in the overall OS, but as matter of practicality would continue call it "Linux" for short. I'm really more surprised they even took it seriously enough to read on air.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Stallman always try to asociate Linux as his success, but no! Ye, without GNU Complier Linus Torvalds were unable to make Linux but No it's not GNU/Linux, Linus made it alone, he wrote the whole Kernel alone, so no, GNU made nothing in Linux OS(just the GNU Compiler).
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as "Linux User" is actually Linux user plus neckbeard, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Neckbeard.
It's OK if you want to call your system Gnu/Linux/Debian/Ubuntu/Gnome/ Compiz. The fact remains that GNU is the OS without a kernel and Linux is just a kernel program. A kernel is one component of a complete OS. Anything else are additions to the already complete GNU/Linux system.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ok, someone shoot this dumbass. What we call 'Linux' is more then just GNU utilities. Most people use a lot more then just a few utilities.
Lets face it, without linux. GNU OS isn't much. When is the last time you started up your GNU Hurd kernel??? LMFAO Linux has more to do with the the OS then the GNU utilities you so deperately spout off about.
The point is that most of the software is free (as in speech) software, which technically makes it part of the GNU operating system. Most people are either forgetting about the Free Software Movement, or don't really know about it. While the OSF is focused on practical advantages, the FSF is focused on the freedoms users have over their software.
BTW, I actually have the hurd running on another machine, and it does work. So piss off.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
who the fuck cares! ughhh! i hate this shit. who cares what it's called? richard stalman, it sucks, but get over it. it's called linux now; we've long left the point of no return.
why is it important to call it "gnu/linux"? im sorry they dont get their names in the credits... lol. if your working for freedom, it shouldnt matter anyway.
It's pronounced G-new? I have always been pronouncing it with a silent G. Also, the copypasta IS relevant to the show, so it's not necessarily "trolling". More like a community injoke is read on the air. .
harizotoh7 2 weeks ago
@harizotoh7 When referring to GNU, Rms wants you to pronounce it as a hard a G.
j8ysen 1 week ago
HILARIOUS
scimath42 1 month ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
StaleMilk5 2 months ago
install gentoo
MeierTV 3 months ago
@MeierTV Install Arch AND Gentoo... using only your penis
BishPl0x 2 months ago
PUSSYKS
simonalamona345 4 months ago
AHAHAHA.
TheLeafhopper 7 months ago
@TechnololG
To avoid spreading unnecessary bias and confusion, it is best to adopt a firm policy not to speak or even think in terms of “intellectual property”.
Read more at gnu. org/philosophy/not-ipr.html
FreeAsInFreedoooooom 9 months ago 2
@TechnololG
The term “intellectual property” carries a hidden assumption—that the way to think about all these disparate issues is based on an analogy with physical objects, and our conception of them as physical property.
When it comes to copying, this analogy disregards the crucial difference between material objects and information: information can be copied and shared almost effortlessly, while material objects can't be.
FreeAsInFreedoooooom 9 months ago 3
@TechnololG
Publishers and lawyers like to describe copyright as “intellectual property”—a term also applied to patents, trademarks, and other more obscure areas of law. These laws have so little in common, and differ so much, that it is ill-advised to generalize about them. It is best to talk specifically about “copyright,” or about “patents,” or about “trademarks.”
FreeAsInFreedoooooom 9 months ago
@guessmynamen00b So you have autism and you are faggot... How nice to hear that you are so...
Next time you (and your friends) know something about monolithic kernels and operating systems history, you can contribute something nice. Something different on that time.
TheFri13 10 months ago
i would like to see what we would call it if the HURD kernel ever becomes operational
jgilb100 10 months ago
@Hax0rPr0n
RMS uses the GANOO name because he didn't want his OS project (the GNU system) to be called 'knoo OS'.
FreeSalesTips 11 months ago
Hahahaha, this made my day. Can't believe I hadn't seen this vid before.
perfectgyroscope 11 months ago
hahahahahhahahaha GNUUBUNTUUUUU
isthisnickvalid 11 months ago
LOLLLLL
NotRummy44 11 months ago
yay GANOO
asfaqqq 1 year ago
Your beard is good. Just a compliment for you about your beard being good.
VinnieSkatesSentry 1 year ago
Gnux.
redninjastarx 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrNukesftw 1 year ago
@MrNukesftw
lol no. GNU stands for "GNU's Not Unix" pronounced G-noo
Its a recursive acronym.
D4VOBRO 1 year ago
@MrNukesftw
Stephen Fry calls it Genu.
Its Genu.
watch?v=AwlDZIDGoc0
sc0tt10 1 year ago
woo! I am 10,000th viewer!
bossyman15 1 year ago
I don't really see this as trolling. The debate in itself is valid, from both sides of the table, i.e. Linus really IS only a kernel, not a complete operating system, and the GNU project has indeed existed for much longer already than Linux in itself. On the other hand "GNU/Linux" or "GNU+Linux" is inpallatable in verbal communiation - it'll do well enough in writing. Stallman proposed calling the whole system LiGNUx, but Torvalds refused. So it's a great OS with a bad name. ;-)
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF Why you are referring Linux as it is Microkernel?
TheFri13 1 year ago
@TheFri13 I have never said that Linux is a microkernel. It's a monolithic kernel, and the GNU native kernel, the Hurd, was intended to be a microkernel but has so far still not reached a usable state. The fact of the matter however remains that Linux is a kernel (and ONLY a kernel) and that the rest of the operating system comes from the GNU project. Both GNU and Linux deserve credit but neither should claim ALL credit.
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF You said it directly. Microkernel is not OS, it is just part of the OS. Monolithic kernel is the OS, not part of the OS. The OS architecture is different, two most used architectures are monolithic and server-client. There is as well a layered archicture as well. None of the GNU software (execluding HURD, GRUB) work without OS.. HURD is not kernel but OS. HURD's kernel is GNU Mach (and L4). Linux is name for the OS and only for such. Not a name for software system.
TheFri13 1 year ago
@TheFri13 [1/2] My friend, you are so very wrong on so many things. A kernel is not an operating system, whether it concerns a microkernel or a monolithic kernel. The kernel is the part of the OS that runs in the processor's highest privilege mode - i.e. ring 0 - while an operating system comprises of a kernel AND a userland (which runs in ring 3). You cannot do anything with a kernel only. You need at least a shell, etc.
AragornCF 1 year ago
[2/2] The difference between a monolithic kernel and a microkernel is that a microkernel only runs a small part of its code in ring 0 - e.g. process scheduling, memory management - whereas a monolithic kernel contains lots of other code as well, e.g. hardware drivers, filesystem and security, et al.. In Mach/Hurd, that other code is run from userspace via a server set. That said, GRUB does not run on Linux or any other OS; it's a mini-OS all by itself.
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF Monolithic kernel has all the OS functions in it. The Server-Client OS has separated the OS to own protected processes what all are running in supervisor mode but can be running in different or same address space. Servers actions are just limited to microkernel. tinyurl . com / ngarn8
Bash, GCC, glibc and all other userspace softwares needs a OS under them. Without OS none of those will work.
tinyurl . com / 3uaq48 (that just for if you understand basic logic based technology)
TheFri13 1 year ago
@TheFri13 I'm afraid that it is you who does not understand basic technology, my friend. You really need to look up on the meaning of the word "kernel". A kernel, whether monolithic, microkernel, exokernel or whatever, is NOT the entire operating system. The kernel is the part of the operating system which runs in ring 0 of the processor, period. An operating system must consist of a kernel AND a userland, i.e. a shell, a toolchain and libraries. With Linux alone, you can't do anything.
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF Kernel was the synonym for the OS definition. Others were "Core, Nucleos, Supervisor, Master Program" and so on. The kernel was the OS when all OS's were monolithics. When the Server-Client architecture was developed, the OS was not anymore just a kernel but microkernel + servers. So other name (OS) became a "standard". You do not use OS directly anyway. But you did not even check those university books and scientifical papers?
TheFri13 1 year ago
@AragornCF It is very wierd that you can not even understand that shell, libraries and so on can not operate without the OS. There are few OS architectures and monolithic is one of them. You are still thinking Linux is like a microkernel, just a part of the OS.
TheFri13 1 year ago
@TheFri13 Dude, I have tried to explain things to you in a courteous manner. You have this weird preconception of what an operating system is and what it consists of, and in addition you also have weird preconceptions about my intellectual abilities. If you're familiar with Wikipedia, then I would suggest taking a look at it because it explains things quite adequately. Please don't bother replying. This debate is not amusing anymore.
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF You are trying to understand OS technology from user perspective. I talk from it by historical and scientifical bases. How the OS works, how and why there are different architectures. Wikipedia confirms that I am right (=Linux kernel is monolithic and it is a OS alone). And still you can not give counter argue about my links what proofs I am right and you are wrong. You are referring that even OS developers like Andrew S.Tanenbaum does not know what the OS is.
TheFri13 1 year ago
@AragornCF
You can find hundreds of the computer science books what explains that monolithic kernel is the whole OS. While microkernel is just part of the OS and the servers (modules) are needed to company it to get working OS. HURD is OS what use GNU Mach or L4 microkernel. HURD is not a kernel but a Server-Client OS.
Linux is monolithic kernel what makes it whole OS. It is modular where modularity is in binary level but not in architecture level.
tinyurl . com / 532kb8
TheFri13 1 year ago
@AragornCF a) Monolithic kernel is the first and original (and still used) OS architecture. b) You do not need shell at all. You do not need any UI done by software. The hardware is UI as well. Like in embedded systems where Linux is used very much because there is need for very stable and fast OS. You can have elevetors where the UI is buttons and LED's are the screen or voice ouput is giving the info.
c) You know how to use tinyurl com / mum9x ? And that is just very very short.
TheFri13 1 year ago
@TheFri13 Lastly, an operating system always needs a userland so that it can be used. Linux is supplied by Torvalds & friends as a kernel only, but you also need the GNU libc, GNU Bash (or another shell), the GNU Core Utilities and some other stuff before you've got a workable OS. X11 is not a requirement, but just about every Linux-based OS uses the GNU toolchain and utilities (and Linux, the kernel, is developed for that), while on the other hand GNU can be used with many other kernels.
AragornCF 1 year ago
@AragornCF
Linus isn't a kernel unto itself, but rather another free component of the Torvalds family.
YetAnotherBadYT 1 year ago
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, shit.
GNU/shit, actually.
kookoon 1 year ago
Linux/GNU users are just fags.
disbuylshite 1 year ago
LOL.
One thing though; why doesn't he press for *BSD to be called GNU/*BSD? FreeBSD for example uses GNU components (GCC comes to mind).
YetAnotherBadYT 1 year ago
@YetAnotherBadYT While there are some GNU tools in BSD, the majority of the various BSD operating systems does not come from GNU. BSD does not use GCC or Glibc, and its kernel certainly doesn't come from GNU either. There IS however a GNU/kFreeBSD system (FreeBSD kernel and GNU userland), and a GNU/kNetBSD and GNU/kOpenBSD, and there even is a GNU/kOpenSolaris (called "NexentaOS"), albeit that there has been some dispute over the licenses as GNU is GPL and the OpenSolaris kernel is CDDL.
AragornCF 1 year ago
Fuck yea, RMS :D
Sticky1254 1 year ago
Haha well done.
oldhatrs25 1 year ago
Linux.
0341593 1 year ago
@0341593
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
buttpoop3 1 year ago
Comment removed
YetAnotherBadYT 1 year ago
GNU/LINUX rockssss !!!
vampspell 1 year ago
I just seen this going on still.
SuperKittyPancake 1 year ago
Gentoo.
elementpollo 2 years ago
trollers are lying stalkers techno pedophile!
Zerosk8er32 2 years ago
People would take Stallman more seriously if he didn't look like a complete hobo.
W0lfenstein3D 2 years ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I thought it was pronounced G-N-U/Linux
unngoy1337 2 years ago
@unngoy1337 no its new gnu im giving thumb up fur you
not ganu new gnu
TheExp420 2 years ago
Well, I see no /b/rothers hear.
8(
SuperKittyPancake 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what is a /b/rother?
kapsakorsten 2 years ago
Nope, I'm right here. I found this vid after googling some spam of this copypasta.
joshkpoole 1 year ago
Comment removed
supadox 2 years ago
trolled HARD
phydr 2 years ago 57
You all have a really loose definition of trolling. He sent a letter to a radio show whose hosts were unfamiliar with the meme and they had brief, even-tempered discussion on air about how about how it's formally correct and that they acknowledge the contributions of the GNU project in the overall OS, but as matter of practicality would continue call it "Linux" for short. I'm really more surprised they even took it seriously enough to read on air.
O0o0o0o000o0oo00 2 years ago 8
@phydr how the fuck were they trolled
AgentCarter 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1337 game related I'm a /g/
casemods 2 years ago
hahaha
goauld88 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stallman always try to asociate Linux as his success, but no! Ye, without GNU Complier Linus Torvalds were unable to make Linux but No it's not GNU/Linux, Linus made it alone, he wrote the whole Kernel alone, so no, GNU made nothing in Linux OS(just the GNU Compiler).
aliancemd 2 years ago
@aliancemd
Are you trolling?
KillaHaakon 2 years ago
I prefer to prononce "Nu" Linux, and "Nome"...
Just as you don't prononce the K in Knife....
frncx 2 years ago
Linux!
librano 2 years ago
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as "Linux User" is actually Linux user plus neckbeard, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Neckbeard.
666SovietNeko 2 years ago 97
GANU.
ZEROEVILDARKCOOL 2 years ago 9
/g/ /g/ /g/ /g/ baby baby baby
TehRassah 2 years ago 14
NO TIME FOR LOVE
theLichKing1 2 years ago 9
lol I get this copypasta on my threads all the time
indexxxxxxxx 2 years ago 2
GNU/Linux is pronounced "GNU Slash Linux". And Linux is pronounced "Linucks", not "Linnicks". You are a newfag, OP.
XFi6 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
XFi6 2 years ago
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Legos, are in fact, Lego Bricks.
EXslowbro 2 years ago 11
thisusernamebssucks , L2Read the video info before posting.
7thsinMoo 2 years ago
Does richard stallman actually say this? and is there a video of it anywhere? I would like to see
stayelusive 2 years ago
im gonna memorize this
elementpollo 2 years ago
You know if we follow the same logic my system would have to be called. Gnu/Linux/Debian/Ubuntu/Gnome/Compiz! lolll
madhi19 2 years ago
It's OK if you want to call your system Gnu/Linux/Debian/Ubuntu/Gnome/ Compiz. The fact remains that GNU is the OS without a kernel and Linux is just a kernel program. A kernel is one component of a complete OS. Anything else are additions to the already complete GNU/Linux system.
FreeSalesTips 2 years ago 3
This is fantastic. 10/10
pYrO1v1aniac 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok, someone shoot this dumbass. What we call 'Linux' is more then just GNU utilities. Most people use a lot more then just a few utilities.
Lets face it, without linux. GNU OS isn't much. When is the last time you started up your GNU Hurd kernel??? LMFAO Linux has more to do with the the OS then the GNU utilities you so deperately spout off about.
Say it, it's OK, "GNU/Linux"
thisusernamebssucks 2 years ago
The point is that most of the software is free (as in speech) software, which technically makes it part of the GNU operating system. Most people are either forgetting about the Free Software Movement, or don't really know about it. While the OSF is focused on practical advantages, the FSF is focused on the freedoms users have over their software.
BTW, I actually have the hurd running on another machine, and it does work. So piss off.
rauron9 2 years ago
JAPANESE BIRD COOKING SPAGHETTI
10cdgawg 2 years ago
guhnoo
Yekkow 2 years ago 4
Oh god, this is great.
TravisAxel 2 years ago
Toasting in a sweet broll video.
Kdx200Owns 2 years ago
running "enemy of your freedom" here
hope he classifies me as a terrorist, I like windows 7
horriblereason 2 years ago
Comment removed
Komputaro 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who the fuck cares! ughhh! i hate this shit. who cares what it's called? richard stalman, it sucks, but get over it. it's called linux now; we've long left the point of no return.
TheyCallMeConfucious 2 years ago
My desktop runs FreeBSD, my "server" runs NetBSD, and my laptop runs Ubuntu, a GNU/Linux distro.
iamgreaser 2 years ago
why is it important to call it "gnu/linux"? im sorry they dont get their names in the credits... lol. if your working for freedom, it shouldnt matter anyway.
TheyCallMeConfucious 2 years ago
Favorited, 5 starred
well done anon
Amebixfan 2 years ago
I'd just like to interject for a moment
rocketlauncher2 2 years ago 3
GUHNOO
elementpollo 2 years ago 2
well done anonymous
martincrotty 2 years ago
And they blatantly kept using Linux throughout the show. May the gods of FOSS strike them down dead
birdlives2000 2 years ago 6
10/10
Velorinoz 2 years ago
Such Win it breaks my mind apart...
DetectivePopcorn 2 years ago
You idiots really need to stop idolizing this fat fascist moron.
partyguerrilla 2 years ago
Would rage again
notanotherreviewer 2 years ago
FREEDOM STATUS: DELIVERED.
VoxAcies 2 years ago 6
I'D LIKE TO INTARJACT FOR A MOMENT
Eiasash 2 years ago 3
oh lawd
1r0bin1 2 years ago
oh /g/
NotSirKitty 2 years ago 6
This is awesome.
vash47 2 years ago 5
i am 12 and what is this
itreius 2 years ago
So much win, fav'd
vagrantoner 2 years ago 3
5 stars, would rate again.
oachkatzlschwoaf86 2 years ago 3
I'll rate for you good sir.
DetectivePopcorn 2 years ago