The industrial and commercial implementation of the thermonuclear controlled reactors and of the universal vehicles will save the European Union and the Planetary Union through the creation a new millions of places of work, through creation of new resources of food for the future generations of men and through the cosmos exit after others material resources.
Through the whirlpool of the magnetic trap are turned and the neutrons. This is the mode of unfolding of the thermonuclear reaction from Sun. The waiting as the collision of fusion let it make accidental or aleatory is not a solution for a commercial installation. Thus after the lateral coupling proton-neutron-proton-neutron in alpha particle, this will attract and will fix rigid and two electrons forming the normal atom of helium(4/2He).
In the tokamak installation the plasma's components(= protons, neutrons and electrons), it can not arrange in lateral unuion as let form alpha particles, respective atoms of normal helium(4/2He). Viz, it can not confine the plasmas's components and it can not realize the starting of the thermonuclear reaction of fusion.
The introduction in whirlpool through plasmatron to the fuel: deuterium and tritium under shape of plasma and in magnetic turning field will go at the arrangement for the lateral unuion of the protons and neutrons in alpha particles. Thus, the electrical particles of the plasma together with neutrons, through union in alpha particles, respecticve in atoms of normal helium(4/2He), become neutral from electrical viewpoint and they will can go out through the magnetic trap.
The model of thermonuclear controlled reactor proposed of myself- reproduces entirely the conditions from Sun. Viz: 1).-produce a globe of plasma and turned it with 800m/s; 2).-ensure a magnetic trap with two electromagnetic crossed fields which dress and turn the globe of plasma; 3).-supply continuously with hydrogen in state of plasma and ensure the its confination. Moreover, makes possibly the direct gathering of the electrical current.
My planetary brethren and you physicists, engineers and men of science let's awaken at reality, at knowledge, at wisdom and let's pass at the construction the thermonuclear controlled reactors, reactors with spherical chamber after Sun model; which can not be dangerous, not even for those which serve these installations.
My brothers, how I can let help? In order that let understand you, that a method, a technology, for instance - the tokamak installation- which not produce, not perform the long-expected results in time of 50 years, this not will can give another result, better, not even in the next 50... 100 years. That is why I insist for to change the used method and the agnostic stand point which ignore the objective reality.
In place let it examine the qualities, the specific features of the chemical matters and the ethereal matters, as let's can create the functional devices, it make only animations on personal computer, as let it hoax the terrestrial world with the thermonuclear plasma in 2018, in 2050, or with the fusion in 2100. The actual ITER project is only a scientific confusion in a practical realization to one practical installation, for to consumer of money of the tax payer.
We have a fear of to examine the mysterious things and we have a fear of the subversive activity of the theoretical science which is emptied of the practical reality and it manifest as phylosophy and show. You the world's theorists, examine the Holy Scriptures and you anderstand it, and take not now of partner on God in the your practical unfulfilments in the your thinking without reason, without logic and without good sense.
"How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You clean the outside of your cup and plate, while the inside is full of what you have obtained by violence and selfishness...You are like whitewashed tombs, which look fine on the outside but are full of bones and decaying corpses on the inside. In the same way, on the outside you appear good to everybody, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and sins".
Thus reproved the our Lord Jesus Christ now 2000 years ago, on the teachers of the Law and the Pharisees in Matthew 23:13-28; in Mark 12:38-40 and Luke 11:39-44, 52; 20:47. "How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You lock the door to the Kingdom of heaven in people's faces, and you yourselves don't go in, nor do you allow in those who are traying to enter!"
How terrible for you, those are indoctrinated with the Eistein's relativity theory and the his disciples: through which was excluded the ether, was excluded the the ethereal matters and the spiritual matters; was excluded the reality of the unseen world of us the embodied men; was excluded God, the God which had invested in each from us a soul as let can exist us like human creature, let's move, let's see, let's hear, let's think, let's work, viz let's function.
How terrible for you, those which have not faith in God as let you can pass from the faith's step at the understanding's step and the knowledge of the things, which are made from ethereal matters and spiritual matters. How terrible for you theoretical physicists and engineers which want not let to accept the existence of the ethereal matters with which works the TV and all the electrical instrumets, apparatus and motors.
The tokamak installation has nothing in common with the Sun and with the thermonuclear controlled fusion. Viz: 1).-can not concentrate and confine the plasma; 2).-can not isolate plasma face of internal walls of the toroidal chamber because they it will smelt at 5...10% from temperature of fusion; 3).-the switchs of heat can not will be used because can not it extract heat from the toroidal chamber.
The model of thermonuclear controlled reactor proposed of myself- reproduces entirely the conditions from Sun. Viz: 1).-produce a globe of plasma and turned it with 800m/s; 2).-ensure a magnetic trap with two electromagnetic crossed fields which dress and turn the globe of plasma; 3).-supply continuously with hydrogen in state of plasma and ensure the its confination. Moreover, makes possibly the direct gathering of the electrical current.
Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. ITER / Fusion releases Tritium. ITER / Fusion consumes 100 billion € - missing in clean renewable energy.
Lets get real here. This stuff is horendously expensive and there is no guarantee it will work. Lets go with something that DOES work. Star Scientific Limited and their Muon Catalysed Fusion. Check them out on google and the chairman's blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath". Also their Youtube channel, especially "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
I have invented not these opinions. I have made only o logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, heaving at base, in majority experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the ITER, but against the utopian conceptions from the theoretical physics, with which are indoctrinated those 3000 of engineers anf physicists involved in the realization of the thermonuclear controllable fusion.
In the magnetic trep of the tokamak it produce only magnetic field which it maintain in the round of the coil, without to fulfil the role of magnetic trap. The electromagnetic field can evolve(go) in space and in the interior of one spherical chamber, can be weaved in order to form a stratified network, which let hold the particles of the thermonuclear plasma.
The texture of toroidal, poloidal or stellarator magnetic field is too rare for to form a magnetic trap. The magnetic trap must let be one electromagnetic stratified wall with weaved at entrance and with disweaved at emergence. The magnetic wall of the magnetic trap is a wall with formation and continuous displacement.
The Sun has two sorts of magnetic fields:1)-the principal magnetic field of the solar magnetosphere which dress the solar mass;2)-the secondary magnetic fields which pass through the whirligig tubes by one hemisphere in another. Because the rotation of the solar mass the lines of the secondary magnetic fields are not parallel with the lines of the principal magnetic field, are adjacent and form at surface of the Sun a texture of magnetic lines as a magnetic wall.
Naw, the ITER can not be makerstars, because the his specialist know not how work the Sun with his principal components. In outside of incandescent solar mass exist: principal magnetic field(solar magnetosphere with magnetic trap); secondary magnetic fields(made by the whirl's tubes); radiations belt, The "butterfly" dyagram(with solar spots position in the ends of the whirl's tubes, which pass through the solar mass); whirl's tubes pressure; magnetic pressure by principal...
The conditions of thermonuclear controlled fusion: temperature, concentration, confinemant and duration - can not obtained never in a tokamak installation, because the her incapacity of the magnetic trap, which can not dress and surround whole the thermonuclear plasma. The plasma can not be restrained, can not be maintained and thus can not be heating. Till now 2010 it confined not the plasma on the tokamak instalations.
Through divertor it remove the impurities from the chamber of termonuclear combustion anf it consider the single zone where the plasma is leted free let touch the walls. Really is good? Really is logical this construction? If will be not existed the solar magnetosphere with the her magnetic trap as let dress complete the incandescent solar mass, then the our planet can burn and remain without water.
Through divertor it remove the impurities from the chamber of thermonuclear combustion and it consider the single zone where the plasma is leted free let touch the walls. Really is good? Really is logical this construction? If will be not existed the solar magnetosphere with the her magnetic trap as let dress complete the incandescent solar mass, then the our planet can burn and remain without water.
The Sun show us how it prepare and how it produce the thermonuclear reaction, and the resonant generator of the Tesla show us how it can extract the electricity - the particles of the electrical ether, without to utilize the switchs of heat. The ethereal explanation of the phenomenon is necessary because in outside of electricity=electrical ether, all ethereal substances are: the electrons, the inductive magnetic field, as and the electrical field.
My brethren, You have capacity of to construct the thermonuclear controlled reactor, only that you must needs let construct something functional. The tokamak were invented in the 1950s by physicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov inspired by idea of to Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studyed the realization of the hydrogen bomb, which has not need of magnetic trap, and thus, all the experiments were finished with the destruction of the tokamak installations in the central zone.
Bwah, this makes it look like they greened up a desert for the site, when in fact they leveled 60 football fields of forest. There, I said it. But still cool science!
@higgsbos so you, being one person, have more wisdom and knowledge to claim such things as this, than hundreds of physisists and scientists around the world
Isn't this pretty close to waste-free? The hydrogen fusion should only produce helium, which isn't radioactive. Tritium as such is radioactice, but its half-life is only around 13 years. Compare that to uranium which's half life is millions of years.
I think they use lithium in nukes to produce tritium. I dont know if they use the same method at ITER, but if they did, it wouldn't produce radioactive isotopes either (except for tritium, ofcourse).
It produced enough neutron activation to leave the place glowing for decades. True it doesn't produce long-term radioactive waste nor can it meltdown, but its economically practical: it be much cheaper to build 4th gen thorium cycle nuclear reactors.
you still have,nt fighgered out to extract the enegy from the plasma soup,the coil you will use will disentergraded in ion gas,try using my sytem it uses laser light tuned to just under the plasma enegy out put.contact me,
tritium not only cheap but it can produce massive amounts of Nuetrons and radiation. theres an alternativelike the heulim-3 but rare in this earth. there is one other large source helium-3 is the moon.
The fuel is easily made of water - means cheap to run, it leaves WAY less nuclear waste - means ecological, when not supervised simply turns off, the process is not self sustaining - means no possible explosion. Uses the process that produces energy on sun - means effective.
furthermore, tritium is very very light, so in case of a "meltdown" or any other breach, it will just "float away" and eventually leave the atmosphere altogether
Not only does controlled fusion produce more power (about 7 times more I think), it is more practical than a nuclear fission reactor in means that if something goes wrong with the reactor you can stop the fusion reaction within seconds rather than hours with a nuclear fission reactor.
The trick to nuclear fusion is that we make it twice the temperature and enclose all the plasma in a magnetic field, because gravity just wont do it for us like the sun does, which really makes it quite difficult.
Add in the disadvantage that a fusion reactor using a
ITER design would be titanically expensive and huge, would produce many fold higher and harder neutrons then nuclear reactors and would need to breed its fuel from lithium.
Not if you use Helium-3, an isotope that releases far less neutrons in its fusion process, reducing reactor degeneration and increasing power production. Which is only a plausible fuel if we enable space-mining, and is possibly the only element that is profitable for out-of-orbit transport.
Yes but that aneutratic fusion, something ITER will never be able to do, only hope for that is a complete novel reactor design like Bussard's or Dense plasma focus.
I hope its successful but it sure isn't getting the money it should. Imagine this what if a 200 million of that 50 billion they are wasting on ITER was to go into a fully functional bussard reactor prototype?
Non-sense, there are plenty of other materials to be exported. Mars also has quite a few other materials that are useful to industry. Think of all the ores produced when Mars used to be geological active.
No ore can be connected to a higher value when it comes to the cost of transporting it into space and back. Helium-3 is rare on Earth but abundant on the surface of the Moon, it's one of the few elements that retain their value because of the increasing need for power and its potential for producing energy. In that sense, without the necessity for electricity, which is ever increasing, it would be useless for economy.
Helium-3 on EARTH is collected from thermal nuclear explosions.
Maybe people don't like the words thermonuclear and experimental in the same sentence. People don't like the word nuclear at all. For example 'nuclear magnetic resonance imaging' is shortened to MRI. Whats the problem? Its still amazing technology that needs to be researched harder and faster. Most people think MRI is great, would they think that if it was called NMRI? Would they still use it if required- of course.
Catastrophic consequences compared to what? A fission reactor under going meltdown~ NO WAY! The plasma is inherently unstable, there is no chance of a run away reaction. Yes the plant would be totaled, as would the engineers/scientists working at the plant. The closest town/village would survive. This is far better than considering the possible 'catastrophic consequences' of a fission reactor meltdown.
Although integrity loss of the reaction containment mechanisms would be very unlikely, the consequences would be catastrophic if the reactor integrity would be compromised during the fusion reaction. I hope, for the sake of all humanity that the experiment will succeed. It would be a big leap towards satisfying all of humanity's energy demands as well as a cleaner environment.
"The partners in the project - the ITER Parties - are the European Union (represented by EURATOM), Japan, the People´s Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the USA." from the iter website
Like Helge said, it won't be happening. BUT, I remember playing a scenario in some strategy game involving the explosion of some "ultimate power plant" in southern France. Believe it was Railroad Tycoon II.
a gas tank is more dangerous than ITER will ever be. It is true that the plasma can damage the walls if it were to contact them the fusion reactions will come to a halt. there is no way the reactor can blow up.
"my memory fails me..." : Trust in google then :s
why the hell is this going to take 29 years to complete? I will be frieken granpa by then--wtf? I think nanotech with biomechanical systems will be a lot more efficient in supplying our energy and cut back on fossil fuels...hell, just a couple of mpg and we reduce our consumption by 2/3'ds---not to mention getting rid of inandescent light bulbs for flurescent ones..This is such a waste of time..someone please tell me why this has to take 29 years to just build an over-goofed tokomak?
@tiberianfallout What Bruno said, and on top of it, we are doing it because it is probably our best hope for the energy crisis. If you actually do your homework, you can easily see that. If it first runs in 2016, then the fusion will be sustainable by 2020, which is ten years. And oh wah if your a grandpa by then, is the ITER fusion reactor being built for you?
can i have one to?
MrBrew4321 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The industrial and commercial implementation of the thermonuclear controlled reactors and of the universal vehicles will save the European Union and the Planetary Union through the creation a new millions of places of work, through creation of new resources of food for the future generations of men and through the cosmos exit after others material resources.
sandustanBrasov 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Through the whirlpool of the magnetic trap are turned and the neutrons. This is the mode of unfolding of the thermonuclear reaction from Sun. The waiting as the collision of fusion let it make accidental or aleatory is not a solution for a commercial installation. Thus after the lateral coupling proton-neutron-proton-neutron in alpha particle, this will attract and will fix rigid and two electrons forming the normal atom of helium(4/2He).
sandustanBrasov 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
In the tokamak installation the plasma's components(= protons, neutrons and electrons), it can not arrange in lateral unuion as let form alpha particles, respective atoms of normal helium(4/2He). Viz, it can not confine the plasmas's components and it can not realize the starting of the thermonuclear reaction of fusion.
sandustanBrasov 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The introduction in whirlpool through plasmatron to the fuel: deuterium and tritium under shape of plasma and in magnetic turning field will go at the arrangement for the lateral unuion of the protons and neutrons in alpha particles. Thus, the electrical particles of the plasma together with neutrons, through union in alpha particles, respecticve in atoms of normal helium(4/2He), become neutral from electrical viewpoint and they will can go out through the magnetic trap.
sandustanBrasov 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The model of thermonuclear controlled reactor proposed of myself- reproduces entirely the conditions from Sun. Viz: 1).-produce a globe of plasma and turned it with 800m/s; 2).-ensure a magnetic trap with two electromagnetic crossed fields which dress and turn the globe of plasma; 3).-supply continuously with hydrogen in state of plasma and ensure the its confination. Moreover, makes possibly the direct gathering of the electrical current.
sandustanBrasov 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
My planetary brethren and you physicists, engineers and men of science let's awaken at reality, at knowledge, at wisdom and let's pass at the construction the thermonuclear controlled reactors, reactors with spherical chamber after Sun model; which can not be dangerous, not even for those which serve these installations.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
My brothers, how I can let help? In order that let understand you, that a method, a technology, for instance - the tokamak installation- which not produce, not perform the long-expected results in time of 50 years, this not will can give another result, better, not even in the next 50... 100 years. That is why I insist for to change the used method and the agnostic stand point which ignore the objective reality.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In place let it examine the qualities, the specific features of the chemical matters and the ethereal matters, as let's can create the functional devices, it make only animations on personal computer, as let it hoax the terrestrial world with the thermonuclear plasma in 2018, in 2050, or with the fusion in 2100. The actual ITER project is only a scientific confusion in a practical realization to one practical installation, for to consumer of money of the tax payer.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
We have a fear of to examine the mysterious things and we have a fear of the subversive activity of the theoretical science which is emptied of the practical reality and it manifest as phylosophy and show. You the world's theorists, examine the Holy Scriptures and you anderstand it, and take not now of partner on God in the your practical unfulfilments in the your thinking without reason, without logic and without good sense.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
"How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You clean the outside of your cup and plate, while the inside is full of what you have obtained by violence and selfishness...You are like whitewashed tombs, which look fine on the outside but are full of bones and decaying corpses on the inside. In the same way, on the outside you appear good to everybody, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and sins".
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Thus reproved the our Lord Jesus Christ now 2000 years ago, on the teachers of the Law and the Pharisees in Matthew 23:13-28; in Mark 12:38-40 and Luke 11:39-44, 52; 20:47. "How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You lock the door to the Kingdom of heaven in people's faces, and you yourselves don't go in, nor do you allow in those who are traying to enter!"
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
How terrible for you, those are indoctrinated with the Eistein's relativity theory and the his disciples: through which was excluded the ether, was excluded the the ethereal matters and the spiritual matters; was excluded the reality of the unseen world of us the embodied men; was excluded God, the God which had invested in each from us a soul as let can exist us like human creature, let's move, let's see, let's hear, let's think, let's work, viz let's function.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
How terrible for you, those which have not faith in God as let you can pass from the faith's step at the understanding's step and the knowledge of the things, which are made from ethereal matters and spiritual matters. How terrible for you theoretical physicists and engineers which want not let to accept the existence of the ethereal matters with which works the TV and all the electrical instrumets, apparatus and motors.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The tokamak installation has nothing in common with the Sun and with the thermonuclear controlled fusion. Viz: 1).-can not concentrate and confine the plasma; 2).-can not isolate plasma face of internal walls of the toroidal chamber because they it will smelt at 5...10% from temperature of fusion; 3).-the switchs of heat can not will be used because can not it extract heat from the toroidal chamber.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The model of thermonuclear controlled reactor proposed of myself- reproduces entirely the conditions from Sun. Viz: 1).-produce a globe of plasma and turned it with 800m/s; 2).-ensure a magnetic trap with two electromagnetic crossed fields which dress and turn the globe of plasma; 3).-supply continuously with hydrogen in state of plasma and ensure the its confination. Moreover, makes possibly the direct gathering of the electrical current.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. ITER / Fusion releases Tritium. ITER / Fusion consumes 100 billion € - missing in clean renewable energy.
Tekknorg 4 months ago
Comment removed
Tekknorg 4 months ago
This music is from an awesome 8-bit nintendo level.
otonanoC 4 months ago
Low tech 90's animation, $1000
ITER Tens of billions dollars
SOUNDTRACK = PRICELESS :D
evilfreethinker 5 months ago
Lets get real here. This stuff is horendously expensive and there is no guarantee it will work. Lets go with something that DOES work. Star Scientific Limited and their Muon Catalysed Fusion. Check them out on google and the chairman's blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath". Also their Youtube channel, especially "In the Footsteps of Fusion"
2110kop 6 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
You see and You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel
sandustanBrasov 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 11 months ago
I liked the part where they installed that one part.
moniker127 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
I have invented not these opinions. I have made only o logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, heaving at base, in majority experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the ITER, but against the utopian conceptions from the theoretical physics, with which are indoctrinated those 3000 of engineers anf physicists involved in the realization of the thermonuclear controllable fusion.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
In the magnetic trep of the tokamak it produce only magnetic field which it maintain in the round of the coil, without to fulfil the role of magnetic trap. The electromagnetic field can evolve(go) in space and in the interior of one spherical chamber, can be weaved in order to form a stratified network, which let hold the particles of the thermonuclear plasma.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The texture of toroidal, poloidal or stellarator magnetic field is too rare for to form a magnetic trap. The magnetic trap must let be one electromagnetic stratified wall with weaved at entrance and with disweaved at emergence. The magnetic wall of the magnetic trap is a wall with formation and continuous displacement.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The Sun has two sorts of magnetic fields:1)-the principal magnetic field of the solar magnetosphere which dress the solar mass;2)-the secondary magnetic fields which pass through the whirligig tubes by one hemisphere in another. Because the rotation of the solar mass the lines of the secondary magnetic fields are not parallel with the lines of the principal magnetic field, are adjacent and form at surface of the Sun a texture of magnetic lines as a magnetic wall.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
Naw, the ITER can not be makerstars, because the his specialist know not how work the Sun with his principal components. In outside of incandescent solar mass exist: principal magnetic field(solar magnetosphere with magnetic trap); secondary magnetic fields(made by the whirl's tubes); radiations belt, The "butterfly" dyagram(with solar spots position in the ends of the whirl's tubes, which pass through the solar mass); whirl's tubes pressure; magnetic pressure by principal...
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The conditions of thermonuclear controlled fusion: temperature, concentration, confinemant and duration - can not obtained never in a tokamak installation, because the her incapacity of the magnetic trap, which can not dress and surround whole the thermonuclear plasma. The plasma can not be restrained, can not be maintained and thus can not be heating. Till now 2010 it confined not the plasma on the tokamak instalations.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
Through divertor it remove the impurities from the chamber of termonuclear combustion anf it consider the single zone where the plasma is leted free let touch the walls. Really is good? Really is logical this construction? If will be not existed the solar magnetosphere with the her magnetic trap as let dress complete the incandescent solar mass, then the our planet can burn and remain without water.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Through divertor it remove the impurities from the chamber of thermonuclear combustion and it consider the single zone where the plasma is leted free let touch the walls. Really is good? Really is logical this construction? If will be not existed the solar magnetosphere with the her magnetic trap as let dress complete the incandescent solar mass, then the our planet can burn and remain without water.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
The Sun show us how it prepare and how it produce the thermonuclear reaction, and the resonant generator of the Tesla show us how it can extract the electricity - the particles of the electrical ether, without to utilize the switchs of heat. The ethereal explanation of the phenomenon is necessary because in outside of electricity=electrical ether, all ethereal substances are: the electrons, the inductive magnetic field, as and the electrical field.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
My brethren, You have capacity of to construct the thermonuclear controlled reactor, only that you must needs let construct something functional. The tokamak were invented in the 1950s by physicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov inspired by idea of to Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studyed the realization of the hydrogen bomb, which has not need of magnetic trap, and thus, all the experiments were finished with the destruction of the tokamak installations in the central zone.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
awesome, so now i can build my own :)
explosionmonty 1 year ago
omg !!!!!!!!!!! my mind is gonna blow up !!!
fredfan2345 1 year ago
Bwah, this makes it look like they greened up a desert for the site, when in fact they leveled 60 football fields of forest. There, I said it. But still cool science!
DerekShannon 1 year ago
nice name jabberwocky
lickanegg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Long live the Soviet Union! The country, suggested to construct ITER and constructed the first tokamak.
KadafiVSC 1 year ago 4
Groovey music
evilfreethinker 1 year ago
insane but completely worth it
tostrong4you 1 year ago
Awesome! I hope i live to see what we are gonna fight proxy wars over in the future.
goliathlup1 1 year ago
Tokamaks are wildly impractical, super--expensive devices.
Cheaper alternatives like DPF (Focus Fusion) and EST are much more viable and deserve more attention.
higgsbos 1 year ago
@higgsbos so you, being one person, have more wisdom and knowledge to claim such things as this, than hundreds of physisists and scientists around the world
dontcommentitsgay 1 year ago
this fusion thing is even more complicated and less trusting than fission
Berialavrenti 2 years ago
more peple watch this video and don t understand what is it : (
and if more people know this progect speak about bullshit and cost : ( : ( ... look how much take youre politicians man !!!
danieleriver 2 years ago
Best. Soundtrack. Ever.
Haimoimoi 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
is this already made?
sammysf415 2 years ago
as easy as lego... ^^
theness5 3 years ago 7
if you have the knowledge of how to put the blocks together ;)
Denusch 2 years ago
I want a Bussard Fusor to power my electric car forever!
Hansolo60 3 years ago
Bussard or Dense Plasma Focus, aneutratic fusion is the way to go, no need for fuel breeding, no neutron activation, smaller, cheaper reactors.
frbe0101 3 years ago
Isn't this pretty close to waste-free? The hydrogen fusion should only produce helium, which isn't radioactive. Tritium as such is radioactice, but its half-life is only around 13 years. Compare that to uranium which's half life is millions of years.
I think they use lithium in nukes to produce tritium. I dont know if they use the same method at ITER, but if they did, it wouldn't produce radioactive isotopes either (except for tritium, ofcourse).
Fusion would be the perfect energy source.
wincelll 3 years ago
It produced enough neutron activation to leave the place glowing for decades. True it doesn't produce long-term radioactive waste nor can it meltdown, but its economically practical: it be much cheaper to build 4th gen thorium cycle nuclear reactors.
frbe0101 3 years ago
where is this ITER will be build???
zufarpandai 3 years ago
In Cadarache - France
uni4dfx 3 years ago
you still have,nt fighgered out to extract the enegy from the plasma soup,the coil you will use will disentergraded in ion gas,try using my sytem it uses laser light tuned to just under the plasma enegy out put.contact me,
Vatherland 3 years ago
Yes, let's all contact some person on youtube that says that s/he has solved all the problems of fusion...
Ran4444 3 years ago
One of the greatest achivements of the mankind,
70% more output compared to the input of energy.
All sources of fuel needed are easy to find on earth with exeption of tritium wich is the most expensive substance on earth.
yotuba187 3 years ago
Tritium is only like $10,000/gm.
Stamid467 3 years ago
tritium not only cheap but it can produce massive amounts of Nuetrons and radiation. theres an alternativelike the heulim-3 but rare in this earth. there is one other large source helium-3 is the moon.
tachyonzero 3 years ago
Die Reaktionsstoffe kosten fast nichts und sind unbegrenzt verfügbar, das Teure sind Entwicklung, Bau und Unterhalt.
Ben5021 3 years ago
The fuel is easily made of water - means cheap to run, it leaves WAY less nuclear waste - means ecological, when not supervised simply turns off, the process is not self sustaining - means no possible explosion. Uses the process that produces energy on sun - means effective.
Joru666 3 years ago 3
furthermore, tritium is very very light, so in case of a "meltdown" or any other breach, it will just "float away" and eventually leave the atmosphere altogether
alexicoff 3 years ago
What advantages does this have over a nuclear reactor?
frbe0101 3 years ago
Not only does controlled fusion produce more power (about 7 times more I think), it is more practical than a nuclear fission reactor in means that if something goes wrong with the reactor you can stop the fusion reaction within seconds rather than hours with a nuclear fission reactor.
The trick to nuclear fusion is that we make it twice the temperature and enclose all the plasma in a magnetic field, because gravity just wont do it for us like the sun does, which really makes it quite difficult.
Azilythe 3 years ago
Add in the disadvantage that a fusion reactor using a
ITER design would be titanically expensive and huge, would produce many fold higher and harder neutrons then nuclear reactors and would need to breed its fuel from lithium.
frbe0101 3 years ago
Not if you use Helium-3, an isotope that releases far less neutrons in its fusion process, reducing reactor degeneration and increasing power production. Which is only a plausible fuel if we enable space-mining, and is possibly the only element that is profitable for out-of-orbit transport.
Azilythe 3 years ago
So we need to mine the moon, add that price in. Also the fusion temp for He3 is far beyond the capabilities of even a tokmak that ITER size.
frbe0101 3 years ago
don't need to mine the moon. p-B11 is the future fuel that is available on Earth
Hansolo60 3 years ago 3
Yes but that aneutratic fusion, something ITER will never be able to do, only hope for that is a complete novel reactor design like Bussard's or Dense plasma focus.
frbe0101 3 years ago 4
This technology is 10 years ahead from now
Hansolo60 3 years ago 3
assuming they work sure, the ITER people are claiming practical fusion in 50 years.
frbe0101 3 years ago 3
When the Polywell Fusor is successful, I doubt that ITER will continue much longer ;)
Hansolo60 3 years ago 3
I hope its successful but it sure isn't getting the money it should. Imagine this what if a 200 million of that 50 billion they are wasting on ITER was to go into a fully functional bussard reactor prototype?
frbe0101 3 years ago 3
Why are they so stupid not to know that?
Hansolo60 3 years ago 3
rumor has it fusion energy has been 50 years away, for 50 years now. lol
sbunkboy3 2 years ago
That´s a nice number to use, considering most people working with this now will be retired or dead by then...
pohjalo 2 years ago
@Azilythe
Non-sense, there are plenty of other materials to be exported. Mars also has quite a few other materials that are useful to industry. Think of all the ores produced when Mars used to be geological active.
HNMpepper 8 months ago
@HNMpepper
Outside of Low Earth Orbit, I'm am referring to.
HNMpepper 8 months ago
@HNMpepper
No ore can be connected to a higher value when it comes to the cost of transporting it into space and back. Helium-3 is rare on Earth but abundant on the surface of the Moon, it's one of the few elements that retain their value because of the increasing need for power and its potential for producing energy. In that sense, without the necessity for electricity, which is ever increasing, it would be useless for economy.
Helium-3 on EARTH is collected from thermal nuclear explosions.
Azilythe 8 months ago
Yes ITER is in Cadarche France!!!:D
but the next priject DEMO will be settled in Japan.
66FlyerBird99 3 years ago
cant believe that they cancled princton's stellerator, iter's dream just got a little slimmer...
547212436 3 years ago
whoa...only Exxon mobile can afford to invest in something this expensive
jprithvi 3 years ago
cool music!!!!
myroseaccount 4 years ago
Maybe people don't like the words thermonuclear and experimental in the same sentence. People don't like the word nuclear at all. For example 'nuclear magnetic resonance imaging' is shortened to MRI. Whats the problem? Its still amazing technology that needs to be researched harder and faster. Most people think MRI is great, would they think that if it was called NMRI? Would they still use it if required- of course.
MrTeaB 4 years ago 4
Catastrophic consequences compared to what? A fission reactor under going meltdown~ NO WAY! The plasma is inherently unstable, there is no chance of a run away reaction. Yes the plant would be totaled, as would the engineers/scientists working at the plant. The closest town/village would survive. This is far better than considering the possible 'catastrophic consequences' of a fission reactor meltdown.
MrTeaB 4 years ago 3
Although integrity loss of the reaction containment mechanisms would be very unlikely, the consequences would be catastrophic if the reactor integrity would be compromised during the fusion reaction. I hope, for the sake of all humanity that the experiment will succeed. It would be a big leap towards satisfying all of humanity's energy demands as well as a cleaner environment.
lurconis666 4 years ago 2
50% of total cost is paid from EU budget.
talonCZ 4 years ago
"The partners in the project - the ITER Parties - are the European Union (represented by EURATOM), Japan, the People´s Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the USA." from the iter website
cupedinarius 4 years ago
I can tell there are few who have a vision of the future.
toothfairy1075 4 years ago
Maybe this will explode and destroy France... :D
smukai2 4 years ago
you are British, aren't you?
tardis191919 4 years ago
It can't explode. The nuclear fusion proces would inmediately stop, in case of a malfunction
Helge129 4 years ago 3
Like Helge said, it won't be happening. BUT, I remember playing a scenario in some strategy game involving the explosion of some "ultimate power plant" in southern France. Believe it was Railroad Tycoon II.
akuyume7 4 years ago
Why did they call it I.T...E.R?
Dizazstar 4 years ago
International Thermonuclear ..... Experimental Reactor
baley7 4 years ago 3
and summing that up, its just ITER now because "Thermonuclear" and "Experimental" don't sound good in the same name.
so wait, I remember they supposedly finally picked a place for it, where was that? my memory fails me...
akuyume7 4 years ago
a gas tank is more dangerous than ITER will ever be. It is true that the plasma can damage the walls if it were to contact them the fusion reactions will come to a halt. there is no way the reactor can blow up.
"my memory fails me..." : Trust in google then :s
baley7 4 years ago
google ruins all conversations on the Internet. lol.
akuyume7 4 years ago 2
Cadarache in France
Giwex 4 years ago
Isn't it going to be near Nice, France? Thought I read that somewhere, but I'm not sure...
cocacola443 3 years ago
Thanks, you've got another fan now!
geoffmthomas 4 years ago 4
Thankyou for subscribing.
I like your story (I read scads of sci-fi) - I'll check for episode 2 in a month or so.
BrunoTheQuestionable 4 years ago
Cheers. I'm hoping to do episode 2 before the end of this month.
geoffmthomas 4 years ago
why the hell is this going to take 29 years to complete? I will be frieken granpa by then--wtf? I think nanotech with biomechanical systems will be a lot more efficient in supplying our energy and cut back on fossil fuels...hell, just a couple of mpg and we reduce our consumption by 2/3'ds---not to mention getting rid of inandescent light bulbs for flurescent ones..This is such a waste of time..someone please tell me why this has to take 29 years to just build an over-goofed tokomak?
tiberianfallout 5 years ago
First Plasma is planned for 2016.
There isn't going to be one magic fix for the worlds energy problems - lots of different technologies will contribute.
BrunoTheQuestionable 5 years ago
@tiberianfallout What Bruno said, and on top of it, we are doing it because it is probably our best hope for the energy crisis. If you actually do your homework, you can easily see that. If it first runs in 2016, then the fusion will be sustainable by 2020, which is ten years. And oh wah if your a grandpa by then, is the ITER fusion reactor being built for you?
Ichvyenichalster 1 year ago
@tiberianfallout it'll take that long because it's being done by governments...
hurbt1980 1 year ago
thank you man ]
omarbog4 5 years ago
I'm planning on posting more engineering videos in the future, so I'll remember to add them to WWE :)
BrunoTheQuestionable 5 years ago
you are welcome ...
and thanks for cooperation ...
omarbog4 4 years ago