Added: 5 years ago
From: BrunoTheQuestionable
Views: 59,300
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (116)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • can i have one to?

  • • SandustanBrasov

    In place let it examine the qualities, the specific features of the chemical matters and the ethereal matters, as let's can create the functional devices, it make only animations on personal computer, as let it hoax the terrestrial world with the thermonuclear plasma in 2018, in 2050, or with the fusion in 2100. The actual ITER project is only a scientific confusion in a practical realization to one practical installation, for to consumer of money of the tax payer.

  • • SandustanBrasov

    "How terrible for you, teachers of the Law and Pharisees! You hypocrites! You clean the outside of your cup and plate, while the inside is full of what you have obtained by violence and selfishness...You are like whitewashed tombs, which look fine on the outside but are full of bones and decaying corpses on the inside. In the same way, on the outside you appear good to everybody, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and sins".

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The model of thermonuclear controlled reactor proposed of myself- reproduces entirely the conditions from Sun. Viz: 1).-produce a globe of plasma and turned it with 800m/s; 2).-ensure a magnetic trap with two electromagnetic crossed fields which dress and turn the globe of plasma; 3).-supply continuously with hydrogen in state of plasma and ensure the its confination. Moreover, makes possibly the direct gathering of the electrical current.

  • Tritium is a radioactive gas, highly toxic if inhaled. It falls to earth with precipitation in the form of tritiated water. The tritium atoms can replace hydrogen atoms (about half the atoms of the human body are composed of hydrogen) and in the form of tritiated water, the isotope of hydrogen can enter the food chain and set in the body, leading to damage and mutations in DNA. ITER / Fusion releases Tritium. ITER / Fusion consumes 100 billion € - missing in clean renewable energy.

  • Comment removed

  • This music is from an awesome 8-bit nintendo level.

  • Low tech 90's animation, $1000

    ITER Tens of billions dollars

    SOUNDTRACK = PRICELESS :D

  • Lets get real here. This stuff is horendously expensive and there is no guarantee it will work. Lets go with something that DOES work. Star Scientific Limited and their Muon Catalysed Fusion. Check them out on google and the chairman's blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath". Also their Youtube channel, especially "In the Footsteps of Fusion"

  • • SandustanBrasov

    The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.

    My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com

    You see and You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel

  • I liked the part where they installed that one part.

  • SandustanBrasov

    I have invented not these opinions. I have made only o logical, rational and intuitive synthesis, heaving at base, in majority experimental, observed and demonstrated arguments. I have not something against the ITER, but against the utopian conceptions from the theoretical physics, with which are indoctrinated those 3000 of engineers anf physicists involved in the realization of the thermonuclear controllable fusion.

  • SandustanBrasov

    In the magnetic trep of the tokamak it produce only magnetic field which it maintain in the round of the coil, without to fulfil the role of magnetic trap. The electromagnetic field can evolve(go) in space and in the interior of one spherical chamber, can be weaved in order to form a stratified network, which let hold the particles of the thermonuclear plasma.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The texture of toroidal, poloidal or stellarator magnetic field is too rare for to form a magnetic trap. The magnetic trap must let be one electromagnetic stratified wall with weaved at entrance and with disweaved at emergence. The magnetic wall of the magnetic trap is a wall with formation and continuous displacement.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The Sun has two sorts of magnetic fields:1)-the principal magnetic field of the solar magnetosphere which dress the solar mass;2)-the secondary magnetic fields which pass through the whirligig tubes by one hemisphere in another. Because the rotation of the solar mass the lines of the secondary magnetic fields are not parallel with the lines of the principal magnetic field, are adjacent and form at surface of the Sun a texture of magnetic lines as a magnetic wall.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Naw, the ITER can not be makerstars, because the his specialist know not how work the Sun with his principal components. In outside of incandescent solar mass exist: principal magnetic field(solar magnetosphere with magnetic trap); secondary magnetic fields(made by the whirl's tubes); radiations belt, The "butterfly" dyagram(with solar spots position in the ends of the whirl's tubes, which pass through the solar mass); whirl's tubes pressure; magnetic pressure by principal...

  • SandustanBrasov

    The conditions of thermonuclear controlled fusion: temperature, concentration, confinemant and duration - can not obtained never in a tokamak installation, because the her incapacity of the magnetic trap, which can not dress and surround whole the thermonuclear plasma. The plasma can not be restrained, can not be maintained and thus can not be heating. Till now 2010 it confined not the plasma on the tokamak instalations.

  • SandustanBrasov

    Through divertor it remove the impurities from the chamber of termonuclear combustion anf it consider the single zone where the plasma is leted free let touch the walls. Really is good? Really is logical this construction? If will be not existed the solar magnetosphere with the her magnetic trap as let dress complete the incandescent solar mass, then the our planet can burn and remain without water.

  • SandustanBrasov

    The Sun show us how it prepare and how it produce the thermonuclear reaction, and the resonant generator of the Tesla show us how it can extract the electricity - the particles of the electrical ether, without to utilize the switchs of heat. The ethereal explanation of the phenomenon is necessary because in outside of electricity=electrical ether, all ethereal substances are: the electrons, the inductive magnetic field, as and the electrical field.

  • SandustanBrasov

    My brethren, You have capacity of to construct the thermonuclear controlled reactor, only that you must needs let construct something functional. The tokamak were invented in the 1950s by physicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov inspired by idea of to Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studyed the realization of the hydrogen bomb, which has not need of magnetic trap, and thus, all the experiments were finished with the destruction of the tokamak installations in the central zone.

  • omg !!!!!!!!!!! my mind is gonna blow up !!!

  • Bwah, this makes it look like they greened up a desert for the site, when in fact they leveled 60 football fields of forest. There, I said it. But still cool science!

  • nice name jabberwocky

  • Groovey music

    

  • insane but completely worth it

  • Awesome! I hope i live to see what we are gonna fight proxy wars over in the future.

  • Tokamaks are wildly impractical, super--expensive devices.

    Cheaper alternatives like DPF (Focus Fusion) and EST are much more viable and deserve more attention.

  • @higgsbos so you, being one person, have more wisdom and knowledge to claim such things as this, than hundreds of physisists and scientists around the world

  • this fusion thing is even more complicated and less trusting than fission

  • more peple watch this video and don t understand what is it : (

    and if more people know this progect speak about bullshit and cost : ( : ( ... look how much take youre politicians man !!!

  • Best. Soundtrack. Ever.

  • as easy as lego... ^^

  • if you have the knowledge of how to put the blocks together ;)

  • I want a Bussard Fusor to power my electric car forever!

  • Bussard or Dense Plasma Focus, aneutratic fusion is the way to go, no need for fuel breeding, no neutron activation, smaller, cheaper reactors.

  • Isn't this pretty close to waste-free? The hydrogen fusion should only produce helium, which isn't radioactive. Tritium as such is radioactice, but its half-life is only around 13 years. Compare that to uranium which's half life is millions of years.

    I think they use lithium in nukes to produce tritium. I dont know if they use the same method at ITER, but if they did, it wouldn't produce radioactive isotopes either (except for tritium, ofcourse).

    Fusion would be the perfect energy source.

  • It produced enough neutron activation to leave the place glowing for decades. True it doesn't produce long-term radioactive waste nor can it meltdown, but its economically practical: it be much cheaper to build 4th gen thorium cycle nuclear reactors.

  • where is this ITER will be build???

  • In Cadarache - France

  • you still have,nt fighgered out to extract the enegy from the plasma soup,the coil you will use will disentergraded in ion gas,try using my sytem it uses laser light tuned to just under the plasma enegy out put.contact me,

  • Yes, let's all contact some person on youtube that says that s/he has solved all the problems of fusion...

  • One of the greatest achivements of the mankind,

    70% more output compared to the input of energy.

    All sources of fuel needed are easy to find on earth with exeption of tritium wich is the most expensive substance on earth.

  • Tritium is only like $10,000/gm.

  • tritium not only cheap but it can produce massive amounts of Nuetrons and radiation. theres an alternativelike the heulim-3 but rare in this earth. there is one other large source helium-3 is the moon.

  • Die Reaktionsstoffe kosten fast nichts und sind unbegrenzt verfügbar, das Teure sind Entwicklung, Bau und Unterhalt.

  • The fuel is easily made of water - means cheap to run, it leaves WAY less nuclear waste - means ecological, when not supervised simply turns off, the process is not self sustaining - means no possible explosion. Uses the process that produces energy on sun - means effective.

  • furthermore, tritium is very very light, so in case of a "meltdown" or any other breach, it will just "float away" and eventually leave the atmosphere altogether

  • What advantages does this have over a nuclear reactor?

  • Not only does controlled fusion produce more power (about 7 times more I think), it is more practical than a nuclear fission reactor in means that if something goes wrong with the reactor you can stop the fusion reaction within seconds rather than hours with a nuclear fission reactor.

    The trick to nuclear fusion is that we make it twice the temperature and enclose all the plasma in a magnetic field, because gravity just wont do it for us like the sun does, which really makes it quite difficult.

  • Add in the disadvantage that a fusion reactor using a

    ITER design would be titanically expensive and huge, would produce many fold higher and harder neutrons then nuclear reactors and would need to breed its fuel from lithium.

  • Not if you use Helium-3, an isotope that releases far less neutrons in its fusion process, reducing reactor degeneration and increasing power production. Which is only a plausible fuel if we enable space-mining, and is possibly the only element that is profitable for out-of-orbit transport.

  • So we need to mine the moon, add that price in. Also the fusion temp for He3 is far beyond the capabilities of even a tokmak that ITER size.

  • don't need to mine the moon. p-B11 is the future fuel that is available on Earth

  • Yes but that aneutratic fusion, something ITER will never be able to do, only hope for that is a complete novel reactor design like Bussard's or Dense plasma focus.

  • This technology is 10 years ahead from now

  • assuming they work sure, the ITER people are claiming practical fusion in 50 years.

  • When the Polywell Fusor is successful, I doubt that ITER will continue much longer ;)

  • I hope its successful but it sure isn't getting the money it should. Imagine this what if a 200 million of that 50 billion they are wasting on ITER was to go into a fully functional bussard reactor prototype?

  • Why are they so stupid not to know that?

  • rumor has it fusion energy has been 50 years away, for 50 years now. lol

  • That´s a nice number to use, considering most people working with this now will be retired or dead by then...

  • @Azilythe

    Non-sense, there are plenty of other materials to be exported. Mars also has quite a few other materials that are useful to industry. Think of all the ores produced when Mars used to be geological active.

  • @HNMpepper

    Outside of Low Earth Orbit, I'm am referring to.

  • @HNMpepper

    No ore can be connected to a higher value when it comes to the cost of transporting it into space and back. Helium-3 is rare on Earth but abundant on the surface of the Moon, it's one of the few elements that retain their value because of the increasing need for power and its potential for producing energy. In that sense, without the necessity for electricity, which is ever increasing, it would be useless for economy.

    Helium-3 on EARTH is collected from thermal nuclear explosions.

  • Yes ITER is in Cadarche France!!!:D

    but the next priject DEMO will be settled in Japan.

  • cant believe that they cancled princton's stellerator, iter's dream just got a little slimmer...

  • whoa...only Exxon mobile can afford to invest in something this expensive

  • cool music!!!!

  • Maybe people don't like the words thermonuclear and experimental in the same sentence. People don't like the word nuclear at all. For example 'nuclear magnetic resonance imaging' is shortened to MRI. Whats the problem? Its still amazing technology that needs to be researched harder and faster. Most people think MRI is great, would they think that if it was called NMRI? Would they still use it if required- of course.

  • Catastrophic consequences compared to what? A fission reactor under going meltdown~ NO WAY! The plasma is inherently unstable, there is no chance of a run away reaction. Yes the plant would be totaled, as would the engineers/scientists working at the plant. The closest town/village would survive. This is far better than considering the possible 'catastrophic consequences' of a fission reactor meltdown.

  • Although integrity loss of the reaction containment mechanisms would be very unlikely, the consequences would be catastrophic if the reactor integrity would be compromised during the fusion reaction. I hope, for the sake of all humanity that the experiment will succeed. It would be a big leap towards satisfying all of humanity's energy demands as well as a cleaner environment.

  • 50% of total cost is paid from EU budget.

  • "The partners in the project - the ITER Parties - are the European Union (represented by EURATOM), Japan, the People´s Republic of China, India, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the USA." from the iter website

  • I can tell there are few who have a vision of the future.

  • Maybe this will explode and destroy France... :D

  • you are British, aren't you?

  • It can't explode. The nuclear fusion proces would inmediately stop, in case of a malfunction

  • Like Helge said, it won't be happening. BUT, I remember playing a scenario in some strategy game involving the explosion of some "ultimate power plant" in southern France. Believe it was Railroad Tycoon II.

  • Why did they call it I.T...E.R?

  • International Thermonuclear ..... Experimental Reactor

  • and summing that up, its just ITER now because "Thermonuclear" and "Experimental" don't sound good in the same name.

    so wait, I remember they supposedly finally picked a place for it, where was that? my memory fails me...

  • a gas tank is more dangerous than ITER will ever be. It is true that the plasma can damage the walls if it were to contact them the fusion reactions will come to a halt. there is no way the reactor can blow up.

    "my memory fails me..." : Trust in google then :s

  • google ruins all conversations on the Internet. lol.

  • Cadarache in France

  • Isn't it going to be near Nice, France? Thought I read that somewhere, but I'm not sure...

  • Thanks, you've got another fan now!

  • Thankyou for subscribing.

    I like your story (I read scads of sci-fi) - I'll check for episode 2 in a month or so.

  • Cheers. I'm hoping to do episode 2 before the end of this month.

  • why the hell is this going to take 29 years to complete? I will be frieken granpa by then--wtf? I think nanotech with biomechanical systems will be a lot more efficient in supplying our energy and cut back on fossil fuels...hell, just a couple of mpg and we reduce our consumption by 2/3'ds---not to mention getting rid of inandescent light bulbs for flurescent ones..This is such a waste of time..someone please tell me why this has to take 29 years to just build an over-goofed tokomak?

  • First Plasma is planned for 2016.

    There isn't going to be one magic fix for the worlds energy problems - lots of different technologies will contribute.

  • @tiberianfallout What Bruno said, and on top of it, we are doing it because it is probably our best hope for the energy crisis. If you actually do your homework, you can easily see that. If it first runs in 2016, then the fusion will be sustainable by 2020, which is ten years. And oh wah if your a grandpa by then, is the ITER fusion reactor being built for you?

  • @tiberianfallout it'll take that long because it's being done by governments...

  • thank you man ]

  • I'm planning on posting more engineering videos in the future, so I'll remember to add them to WWE :)

  • you are welcome ...

    and thanks for cooperation ...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more