Love it the irs are the real terrorist couldn't of say it better wow he is the man. And Im black and I agree with what he said about the civil war they could have paid for the slave if they really wanted them free.
Hey, check out my Ron Paul vs Lincoln video. If you don't believe in secession, then you believe in slavery, for you are for enslaving people to a government that they want no part of:
Ron Paul was speaking reason and restraint about Iran 8 months before the National Intelligence Estimate even came out, which backed up EVERYTHING he was saying for months. That smug little shit pundit thinks he's telling Dr. Paul something, come off it kid!
If you haven't read The Real Lincoln by DiLorenzo I would highly recommend it. Arrogant, smug experts like the old grey hair on the panel are proven to be utterly wrong. Nothing else to say, DiLorenzo did a masterful job of not only unwinding decades of false history but he also backs everything up with quotes and references.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Deny whose history and truth. Ron Paul loves the wacky conspiracy theories. He is right about nation building. He says some very good stuff. Often the right message coming from a waacked out messenger. Check your medication Ron.
Whos the white haired ass who keeps saying that Ron Pauls wrong about Lincoln. Lincoln was an asshole as president. Ron Paul was absolutley RIGHT. That white haired guy is ignorant and only studies what makes him feel warm inside.
Everyone is also taught to believe that JFK was such a great president, but had he lived to be reelected the $hit would have hit the fan about his extramarital affairs, just like what happened to Clinton in his second term. The white haired guy isn't the only ass. I felt they were quite disrespectful toward Ron Paul.
Ron Paul said Lincoln started the civil war -- and that Wilson was wrong to win world war one. Nonsense -- Wilson was right to save the world. Lincoln didnt start civil war - he ended it, and used it, once it started, to end slavery.
1. Lincoln's reason for fighting the Civil War was not to abolish slavery. It was for the single goal of preserving the Union. (He later joined the Abolitionist cause to the war effort, partly as political tactic.)
2. Though he was responding to Confederate acts of insurrection, Lincoln shared responsibility in starting the Civil War (not that he was wrong to do so).
Lincoln did nothing to start the Civil war you moron. What the fuck did he do to start it? What a fucking idiot. Lincoln didn't attack anyone you idiot, the south did. Lincoln was bending over backward not to do ANYTHING till the South attacked. Then he kicked ass.
What do you mean Lincoln did NOTHING to start the Civil War? He went to war to preserve the Union. The South wanted to secede. Lincoln said no. Not that I am taking the Confederate side. Lincoln made the best decision IMO. However, Lincoln had the CHOICE to allow the South to secede or preserve the Union. He CHOSE to preserve the Union. What you said was not wrong, just grossly over-simplified. Oh and nobody with the reading comprehension of a third grader should call anyone a "fucking idiot."
There was no Constitutional authority for Lincoln to "force" state governments to remain in the union. The Constitution was designed to dissolve the federal government or for the state to remove themselves from it if it didn't serve their people. Lincoln was wrong and unfortunately it cost us 600k people.
2. Aside from dragging us into a European Civil War, Woodrow Wilson was a power-hungry despot and a disgusting racist. The fact that you consider him a hero reveals what fascist scum you are.
As for Lincoln, unlike that asshole Wilson, Lincoln (and FDR) was a decent president. (I guess I go against my fellow "Paultards" in calling Lincoln and FDR decent.) Lincoln was a great statesman, but not perfect or flawless.
1. The Germans posed no threat to the USA. The unrestricted submarine warfare campaign was a counter to a British naval blockade of Europe (which deprived not only Germans but Poles, Hungarians, and other Central Europeans of food and supplies). Germany announced the plan and warned against traveling in the vicinity. Yet Wilson let American passengers to board the Lusitania (which carried an explosive cargo). Were it not for the blast the ship would've sunk slow enough to save the passengers.
The Germans posed no threat? Are you retarded? Where do they get these idiots. Germany helped Japs attack pearl you idiot. Plus, German declared WAR on the USA you idiot. What the hell you mean they posed no threat you idiot? THey declared WAR on us, cause they were allies with the slant eyed jap monkeys.
Uh, ASSHOLE. In the posts when I said the Germans posed no threat I meant during WW1. If you read all my posts, you would get the context. In WW2, the Germans DID pose a threat. They were after all, prepared to go to war with America. (And fighting the Nazis was the right thing to do). However, WW2 was NOT WW1. Though Nazi Germany was a very real threat, the alleged WW1 threat was all hype! (Also, though the Nazis and Japs were allies, to my knowledge Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on their own.)
1. The Germans posed no threat to the USA. The unrestricted submarine warfare campaign was a counter to a British naval blockade of Europe (which deprived not only Germans but Poles, Hungarians, and other Central Europeans of food and supplies). Germany announced the plan and warned against traveling in the vicinity. Yet Wilson let American passengers to board the Lusitania (which carried an explosive cargo). Were it not for the blast the ship would've sunk slow enough to save the passengers.
In a nutshell, the First World War was a racist war of aggression against the Germans, the Second World War was a racist war of aggression by the Germans (essentially revenge for the prequel). Pan-Slavism, a racist, anti-Semitic, proto-fascist ideology and the basis for the Serbo-Russian alliance, was the key factor in transforming a local war in the Balkans into a continental one. If you read once in a while, you might know stuff. American intervention led to the Treaty of Versaille.
3. Wilson was right to save the world? What the FUCK? How did Wilson save the world? Save the world from what? I don't remember hearing anything so stupid. Unless by "saving the world" you mean laying the foundations for WW2, the Holocaust, World Communism, etc.
4. You obviously know nothing about history. Guess what, the "Krauts" were not the bad guys in WW1. If anything, the Germans were running a much more ethical war. WW1 and WW2 had little in common.
1. Wilson wasn't only wrong to "win" WW1, he was wrong to drag America into Europe's Great War
2. America didn't win WW1. The Entente won, USA lost. (While all the Central Powers lost. It is an undisputed fact that Russia lost, big time, even though they fought on the winning side.) We lost because we entered a war beyond our national interests, and Wilson failed his goals (14 Points, League of Nations). The only nations to come out victorious were Britain, France, and Belgium
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This moron Ron Paul thinks if you just tuck your head up your asp, the world and you will be fine. If idiots like Ron Paul were in charge, we would have been taken over by Japs and Germans years ago.
Wilson was a neo-con? Leo Strauss was the father of the neo-con movement. Wilson was dead before Strauss was out of highschool. Lincoln started the civil war? Ron Paul is so old his brain is shrinking.
Was Wilson a neo-con? Yes and No. Granted, Leo Strauss is considered the "godfather of neoconservatism." So, no Wilson was not REALLY a neocon, however, neoconservatism, is revived Wilsonianism. T. Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were imperialists (ironically called "Progressives"). The so-called Progressives were the neocons of their day. In a sense, Wilson was more of a neocon than Bush Co. could ever dream of being. The key influences on neocon ideology are T. Roosevelt, Wilson, Trotsky, Strauss
Man, I was afraid that people might be fooled by that guy simply claiming, "He's wrong," because he seems to speak with authority. Looks like everyone commenting on this is able to think for himself. Good last word from Ron Paul, too.
"He is completely wrong about Abraham Lincoln." What the hell was he wrong about? Everyone knows the Civil War wasn't about slavery. And it is also true that the United States was the only country where abolition was accompanied by a massive conflict. Completely wrong about what?? That grey haired guy is a little loopy if you ask me.
I can't stand when someone accuses another of being wrong when they're unwilling to do the research themselves. Just because an idea is unpopular it doesn't make it wrong. Most geniuses were considered nuts when they first introduced their controversial ideas and only later were they recognized as being ahead of their time. It wasn't long ago that Galileo was threatened with death for saying that earth was round.
That's funny, I know an editor-in-chief of a major paper in Pittsburgh and he's not Jewish. I also know of plenty of non-Jews that lie, cheat and deceive. The caucasian race is full of cheaters and liars... Go find a real cause to stand behind, you sound obsolete.
See part1.. Rude and one-sided reporters they need to have a class action law sued against them for obstruction of the truth in reporting and for slander of their guest. Their innuendos and comments on the demeanor of Dr. Ron Paul (who is correct) has made me a non-believer in MSM. If this is unbiased, "Fair and Equal reporting" then I am SUPERMAN. I cant believe Microsoft is a co-sponsor of this crap!.. Eh? This is you Bill Gates!!
Commentator almost choked on his spit on the mention of Symore Herst 3:38.. It was unconfortable for those commentators ... Wow Its like they seen the holy ghost of truth lol
Yeah, seriously... Ron Paul was bringing up real sources for historical and political facts?? Not the New York Times, or Time Magazine, or CNN or something? That's absurd!
the interview was over and Jacobs gives Ron a cheap shot . What class. If he had any balls he would ask some real questions but I guess he knows that RP knows the truth.
Thank you Dr.Paul, for speaking what you believe and what is true. This type of fixed media should be banned. If they spoke the way they feel it would be ok but they are told what to say
True MSM hacks -- Following the last NIE report, Bush said, "...the report changes nothing..." To deny the option to bomb IRAN was off the table proves they need to do their homework!
Love it the irs are the real terrorist couldn't of say it better wow he is the man. And Im black and I agree with what he said about the civil war they could have paid for the slave if they really wanted them free.
newjustice1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, check out my Ron Paul vs Lincoln video. If you don't believe in secession, then you believe in slavery, for you are for enslaving people to a government that they want no part of:
youtube.com/watch?v=oiH_XnqnyHU
ErikLiberty 1 year ago
For 2012 RP should be very selective with who he does interviews with. These morons don't deserve to be talked to.
chunstiger 2 years ago
Ron Paul was speaking reason and restraint about Iran 8 months before the National Intelligence Estimate even came out, which backed up EVERYTHING he was saying for months. That smug little shit pundit thinks he's telling Dr. Paul something, come off it kid!
Eric21ND 3 years ago
If you haven't read The Real Lincoln by DiLorenzo I would highly recommend it. Arrogant, smug experts like the old grey hair on the panel are proven to be utterly wrong. Nothing else to say, DiLorenzo did a masterful job of not only unwinding decades of false history but he also backs everything up with quotes and references.
jackers252 3 years ago
WAIT
did he say ron paul isnt participating grass roots?!
wtf!
tommyisirish 3 years ago
LINCOLN WAS A TYRANT!!!!
HeritageNotHateProd 3 years ago 2
I believe those guys were just "Pauled"
prof5759 3 years ago 2
the guy with the gray hair is a stupid fuck who doesn't deserve his freedom.
strapt313 3 years ago 3
i agree lol
HeritageNotHateProd 3 years ago
He deserves a dick in his tight ass.
JJaguars84 3 years ago
He is Jack Jacobs, a complete fool.
randyguitarman13 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Deny whose history and truth. Ron Paul loves the wacky conspiracy theories. He is right about nation building. He says some very good stuff. Often the right message coming from a waacked out messenger. Check your medication Ron.
siamdesperado 4 years ago
Whos the white haired ass who keeps saying that Ron Pauls wrong about Lincoln. Lincoln was an asshole as president. Ron Paul was absolutley RIGHT. That white haired guy is ignorant and only studies what makes him feel warm inside.
thor718 4 years ago 2
Everyone is also taught to believe that JFK was such a great president, but had he lived to be reelected the $hit would have hit the fan about his extramarital affairs, just like what happened to Clinton in his second term. The white haired guy isn't the only ass. I felt they were quite disrespectful toward Ron Paul.
packrat76 4 years ago
Ron Paul said Lincoln started the civil war -- and that Wilson was wrong to win world war one. Nonsense -- Wilson was right to save the world. Lincoln didnt start civil war - he ended it, and used it, once it started, to end slavery.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
1. Lincoln's reason for fighting the Civil War was not to abolish slavery. It was for the single goal of preserving the Union. (He later joined the Abolitionist cause to the war effort, partly as political tactic.)
2. Though he was responding to Confederate acts of insurrection, Lincoln shared responsibility in starting the Civil War (not that he was wrong to do so).
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
Lincoln did nothing to start the Civil war you moron. What the fuck did he do to start it? What a fucking idiot. Lincoln didn't attack anyone you idiot, the south did. Lincoln was bending over backward not to do ANYTHING till the South attacked. Then he kicked ass.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
What do you mean Lincoln did NOTHING to start the Civil War? He went to war to preserve the Union. The South wanted to secede. Lincoln said no. Not that I am taking the Confederate side. Lincoln made the best decision IMO. However, Lincoln had the CHOICE to allow the South to secede or preserve the Union. He CHOSE to preserve the Union. What you said was not wrong, just grossly over-simplified. Oh and nobody with the reading comprehension of a third grader should call anyone a "fucking idiot."
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
There was no Constitutional authority for Lincoln to "force" state governments to remain in the union. The Constitution was designed to dissolve the federal government or for the state to remove themselves from it if it didn't serve their people. Lincoln was wrong and unfortunately it cost us 600k people.
jackers252 3 years ago
2. Aside from dragging us into a European Civil War, Woodrow Wilson was a power-hungry despot and a disgusting racist. The fact that you consider him a hero reveals what fascist scum you are.
As for Lincoln, unlike that asshole Wilson, Lincoln (and FDR) was a decent president. (I guess I go against my fellow "Paultards" in calling Lincoln and FDR decent.) Lincoln was a great statesman, but not perfect or flawless.
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
1. The Germans posed no threat to the USA. The unrestricted submarine warfare campaign was a counter to a British naval blockade of Europe (which deprived not only Germans but Poles, Hungarians, and other Central Europeans of food and supplies). Germany announced the plan and warned against traveling in the vicinity. Yet Wilson let American passengers to board the Lusitania (which carried an explosive cargo). Were it not for the blast the ship would've sunk slow enough to save the passengers.
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
The Germans posed no threat? Are you retarded? Where do they get these idiots. Germany helped Japs attack pearl you idiot. Plus, German declared WAR on the USA you idiot. What the hell you mean they posed no threat you idiot? THey declared WAR on us, cause they were allies with the slant eyed jap monkeys.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Uh, ASSHOLE. In the posts when I said the Germans posed no threat I meant during WW1. If you read all my posts, you would get the context. In WW2, the Germans DID pose a threat. They were after all, prepared to go to war with America. (And fighting the Nazis was the right thing to do). However, WW2 was NOT WW1. Though Nazi Germany was a very real threat, the alleged WW1 threat was all hype! (Also, though the Nazis and Japs were allies, to my knowledge Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on their own.)
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
1. The Germans posed no threat to the USA. The unrestricted submarine warfare campaign was a counter to a British naval blockade of Europe (which deprived not only Germans but Poles, Hungarians, and other Central Europeans of food and supplies). Germany announced the plan and warned against traveling in the vicinity. Yet Wilson let American passengers to board the Lusitania (which carried an explosive cargo). Were it not for the blast the ship would've sunk slow enough to save the passengers.
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
In a nutshell, the First World War was a racist war of aggression against the Germans, the Second World War was a racist war of aggression by the Germans (essentially revenge for the prequel). Pan-Slavism, a racist, anti-Semitic, proto-fascist ideology and the basis for the Serbo-Russian alliance, was the key factor in transforming a local war in the Balkans into a continental one. If you read once in a while, you might know stuff. American intervention led to the Treaty of Versaille.
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
3. Wilson was right to save the world? What the FUCK? How did Wilson save the world? Save the world from what? I don't remember hearing anything so stupid. Unless by "saving the world" you mean laying the foundations for WW2, the Holocaust, World Communism, etc.
4. You obviously know nothing about history. Guess what, the "Krauts" were not the bad guys in WW1. If anything, the Germans were running a much more ethical war. WW1 and WW2 had little in common.
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
@ MarcDumbassC:
1. Wilson wasn't only wrong to "win" WW1, he was wrong to drag America into Europe's Great War
2. America didn't win WW1. The Entente won, USA lost. (While all the Central Powers lost. It is an undisputed fact that Russia lost, big time, even though they fought on the winning side.) We lost because we entered a war beyond our national interests, and Wilson failed his goals (14 Points, League of Nations). The only nations to come out victorious were Britain, France, and Belgium
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This moron Ron Paul thinks if you just tuck your head up your asp, the world and you will be fine. If idiots like Ron Paul were in charge, we would have been taken over by Japs and Germans years ago.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
if u watched the earlier morning joe after his $6mil bomb, he said explicitly he would have intervened in WW2.
next time make sure u find out more about candidates before making lame assumptions
Konig1985 4 years ago 4
Wilson was a neo-con? Leo Strauss was the father of the neo-con movement. Wilson was dead before Strauss was out of highschool. Lincoln started the civil war? Ron Paul is so old his brain is shrinking.
wtfoof 4 years ago
Was Wilson a neo-con? Yes and No. Granted, Leo Strauss is considered the "godfather of neoconservatism." So, no Wilson was not REALLY a neocon, however, neoconservatism, is revived Wilsonianism. T. Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson were imperialists (ironically called "Progressives"). The so-called Progressives were the neocons of their day. In a sense, Wilson was more of a neocon than Bush Co. could ever dream of being. The key influences on neocon ideology are T. Roosevelt, Wilson, Trotsky, Strauss
R3n3gad3Z3d 4 years ago
Man, I was afraid that people might be fooled by that guy simply claiming, "He's wrong," because he seems to speak with authority. Looks like everyone commenting on this is able to think for himself. Good last word from Ron Paul, too.
penpusher9 4 years ago
Spooky, they thought Bhutto survived the blast...this is after they heard about the bomb but before they heard the news she got killed
warchild81 4 years ago
"He is completely wrong about Abraham Lincoln." What the hell was he wrong about? Everyone knows the Civil War wasn't about slavery. And it is also true that the United States was the only country where abolition was accompanied by a massive conflict. Completely wrong about what?? That grey haired guy is a little loopy if you ask me.
reefpirate 4 years ago 2
LOL..."I think there is a Paris Hilton News...ill let you talk about that"...pawned!!!
eastsider786 4 years ago
I can't stand when someone accuses another of being wrong when they're unwilling to do the research themselves. Just because an idea is unpopular it doesn't make it wrong. Most geniuses were considered nuts when they first introduced their controversial ideas and only later were they recognized as being ahead of their time. It wasn't long ago that Galileo was threatened with death for saying that earth was round.
SeventhSon333 4 years ago
Joe Jr. is voting for Ron Paul. Where is Joe?
tomrdee 4 years ago
when it comes to moral, ethics, or better peaceful solutions...ron paul is never wrong. he speaks the truth and is NOT afraid to spread it.
mreisma 4 years ago
ALL TV, newspapers, radio magazines, movies and bookpublishers are controlled by zionist jews and lie, cheat and deceive.
buckinohio 4 years ago
That's funny, I know an editor-in-chief of a major paper in Pittsburgh and he's not Jewish. I also know of plenty of non-Jews that lie, cheat and deceive. The caucasian race is full of cheaters and liars... Go find a real cause to stand behind, you sound obsolete.
reefpirate 4 years ago
See part1.. Rude and one-sided reporters they need to have a class action law sued against them for obstruction of the truth in reporting and for slander of their guest. Their innuendos and comments on the demeanor of Dr. Ron Paul (who is correct) has made me a non-believer in MSM. If this is unbiased, "Fair and Equal reporting" then I am SUPERMAN. I cant believe Microsoft is a co-sponsor of this crap!.. Eh? This is you Bill Gates!!
123zaba123 4 years ago 3
Commentator almost choked on his spit on the mention of Symore Herst 3:38.. It was unconfortable for those commentators ... Wow Its like they seen the holy ghost of truth lol
memelito 4 years ago 4
Yeah, seriously... Ron Paul was bringing up real sources for historical and political facts?? Not the New York Times, or Time Magazine, or CNN or something? That's absurd!
reefpirate 4 years ago 2
LOL I'll bet you that guy right there was on his Laptop ( as you can see he is ) looking up what Paul was saying.
David is a bonehead, Bush and his Admin also said they can't rely on the Intelligence On Iran, not that PAUL said to do it.
MrMP81 4 years ago
god, he just speaks his mind and blows all those msm puppets away. i love this man. go ron paul!
yuhoo7 4 years ago 3
Thank God we have Ron Paul to take on these neocon traitors! Dr Paul is the ONLY one speaking the truth.
azzuregasm 4 years ago 3
I think traitors is a pretty strong word. They could certainly be sincerely misinformed.
jamesjwilsonsr 4 years ago
I think traitors is a pretty strong word. They could certainly be sincerely misinformed.
jamesjwilsonsr 4 years ago
Wow they were uncomfortable. Way in over their heads while Talking with Dr. Paul.
sisterwood2000 4 years ago 3
the interview was over and Jacobs gives Ron a cheap shot . What class. If he had any balls he would ask some real questions but I guess he knows that RP knows the truth.
rpsuport8 4 years ago 2
Thank you Dr.Paul, for speaking what you believe and what is true. This type of fixed media should be banned. If they spoke the way they feel it would be ok but they are told what to say
jessejames444 4 years ago 6
Don't you mean, my god and savior, the returned Christ, Ron Paul? Oooppps, I forgot to put Dr. in there!
wtfoof 4 years ago
Thats pretty ignorant
jessejames444 4 years ago
True MSM hacks -- Following the last NIE report, Bush said, "...the report changes nothing..." To deny the option to bomb IRAN was off the table proves they need to do their homework!
nigheve2k 4 years ago 5
you can feel that they know they are wrong. Their body language alone.
beanie1816 4 years ago 3
A little background on Crazy Jack Jacobs. He's a true loon:
youtube dot com/watch?v=-p3dSqwgKZw
bigsid920 4 years ago 4