Added: 5 years ago
From: bahman19
Views: 36,051
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (738)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • christian is the first religion to beat the number of buddism.and ever since became world no 1 religion.

    and even muslim after 1400 years.if muslim is true religion many people could have converted to islam and make them no 1 religion.

  • Do not hate Islam. Islam is THE TRUE Religion. None other than Islam dare to claim the truth fullness. Allah claimed his the creator of all things. Any other dare to make such a claim? No one!!. Why must choose the truth Religion? because we are the most brainy creatures Allah has created . Except we hate of being brainy!!

  • if you lack understanding, you'll fail to see any knowledge. so for you to curse the book says nothing about the book.. and much more about yourself! Good luck to you.. lmao

  • theses noobs idiot find science in a book of of all bulshits quran !!! not one single fact is correct in quran ... separation of hell heaven nd earth is lokked as bing bang wat fucking noobs u muslims are ... how can be some one so dumb to beleve god need to write book and wants his name to be taken in specfic langugae as "allah" then he shouldnt have created other languages in first place !! wat dumb shit !!

  • @rajtanwar21

    Allah is the arabic name for God. Muslims believe the same God Christians do as well as follow all the prophets he has sent for them such as Jesus, Noah, Jonah etc.

  • @1t13urnz

    bro allah is name of pre islamic moon's god u can refer to ny pre historic book for this...

  • @rajtanwar21 No, in the past, some people had forgot the truth, and they became budist. You cant hide the Truth by showing failure of people!

    112 - The Unity

    In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

    1 Say: He is Allah, the One;

    2 Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;

    3 He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;

    4 And there is none like unto Him.

  • @smhdmc1 let me tell u one things when asked to budha whether god exist or not he never said yes.!!! he said " its irrvelant whether god exist or not " budhist never belived in any form of god they do not belive in god !! its only after brahmins who got converted in budhism spread this rumour of gods in budhism !!!

    any 5 th class science book will prove any religion in the world wrong !! ur quran says universe is 5000 years old .. please we have ndus valley civilization which are 7000 yeras

  • @rajtanwar21

    You said ''ur Quran says universe is 5000 years old ''. Can you show the proof about this ?

    dinasours change nothing. World can be a factory, organic materials can be raw materials, then organisms are products. But who is the inventor of this design?

    Now you r looking at the screen, you know it was built in a factory, but you know it was invented by a planner! Now look at urself, u r more complicated then a computer, so u were planned by a Designer!Allah.

  • @smhdmc1 yes they change everything there is no where mentioned about dinaosurs in quran !!! so quran is not book of god !! please time to realize we have creator but he dint creted us to pray him !!! he doenst want us to keep fucking beared and cover our women in burka if he wanted gals he would have given them forskin like our pennis have !!! so simply allah or whatever god humans think is not god !! i believe in supernatural power but not religious shit

  • @rajtanwar21 When a friend gives u a gift, you say ''thanks'', u shows a 'love'. God has given everything to us, God gives us to us. So when we say thanks for a gift, shouldnt we say thanks, or shouldnt we shows a love to that Absolute Infinite Power

  • @rajtanwar21 those muslims try to proof of their believe - so why you are so angry..? why you love to use bad words like - Shit n pennis.. calm down lol... But the good thing is you wanna know something ( dinosour ) - Why dont you try to find it your self by learn, read and research holy Quran. And you will found it - tq

  • @rajtanwar21 -- Where did you found that Quran says universe age is 5000 years old..? which verse? please be sure the source .. it is better for you to get the true fact directly from Quran before you say something...

  • @smhdmc1 all the mullah deny the fact that dinasour ever existed are u guys crazy we got their bones dna everything hw canu just not see these facts !! dinasours were there before humantiy which simply proves there was no allah no god no creator !!! and tell me if there was why would he ll make infinte galaxy for us ?? why think befoe its too late

  • @rajtanwar21 that is the why your fact is all wrong... because you never get the source from Quran.. you just read the wrong book- Pre islamic historic is writen by non-muslim lol.. please be remind - if you really wanna know about islam please study quran first.

  • @1t13urnz dude allah is the name of moon's god please check pre islamic history u will find it !! pegans before islam or christyanity used to worship allah in the forms of idols !!! those idols were destroyed by prophet and his army !! its all in history please find it if u really have quest fro truth

  • This is so phony. If Muslims keep believing this nonsense, they will keep being last in the world in science and mathematics.

  • @BaldinLeePramer btw you are so blind and kid, because as a Muslim and Arabic from Egypt, we here have many scientists almost in everything but our government is was so bad and it's wasn't let them to do any development in Egypt so they go to a big country like usa and others , and for example Dr. Ahmed Zewail he has won Nobel Prize in Chemistry because he is the one who discover the device that your christian country was think it's impossible to do it, so think again and don't be stupid.

  • @vito123321 what was the device called?

  • @Guitarguitars12 en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Ahmed_Zewail

  • @vito123321 masha Allah

  • @BaldinLeePramer do you know how much they developed science during middle age? Ibn Khaldoun, Ibn Al-Haytham, Al-Khawarizimi etc I took history classes :D it's wonderful

  • I was very disappointed after watching this; It's all just numerology plain and simple.

  • thats y its cold Ultimate Mathematics of the Quran

  • how can anyone with a logical mind turn away from this indisputable evidence? It is beyond me. Peace be upon you all.

  • @omnipotence99 WHAT indisputable evidence...given that the VAST MAJORITY of worlds brightest intellects, i.e. scientists,physicians are not only NOT muslim...but atheist

    evolution is an indesputable fact

    now WHAT is there to prove any allah...NOT A SHRED OF ANYTHING exists, plus koran proves how muslim are lied to

  • @proudfemale 'evolution is an indesputable fact'. you should let the scientific community know this immediately!

  • @omnipotence99

    Evidence has to be verifiable and it is not the culture of faith to rely on numerology. It is just a bit much to expect people to accept this without independent verification of counts (which have little to do with spiritual (i.e. religious) Islam besides). It is worth more investigation.

    Peace to you.

  • watch?v=mzrO4yp808c

  • == Ultimate mathematics of the Hitchhiker's trilogy == SPACE 174-EARTH 174 STARS 48-DARKNESS 48 WAR 28-FRIEND 28 LIVES 25-DEATH 25 INVISIBLE 17-SPACESHIPS 17 GOD 47-ALIEN 47 WIFE 16-EVIL 16 WOMAN 41-CAVE 41-FUN 41 SANDWICH 56-DROPPED 56 ROCK 70-PAPER 70-SCISSORS 1 WORLDS 28-WONDER 28-BEAUTIFUL 28 INCOMPREHENSIBLE 11-IMAGINATION 11-FACTS 11-EVIDENCE 11 SCIENCE 20-SEARCH 20 QUESTIONS 22-REASONS 22 MYSTERIOUS 15-PATTERNS 15 WONDERFUL 58-MORNING 58 START 58-THINKING 58 -- wredcht
  • The mathematics of allah is to take box cutters and plunge it into the neck of those pilots on 9/11 screamong ALLAH O AKBAR and letting those pilots gargle and suufocate on their own blood whilst trying to take their last breaths - everyone - imagine you are one of those pilots - not to mention the thousands will be jumping from buildings shortly after and knowing that these islamic bastards are muttering ALLAH O AKBAR ( god is great ). The day of reckoning is sure to come.

  • @whiteliketar 9/11 Inside Job!! It Was Satan Who Make It Up. The Same One Who Rule USA And Israel.

  • @whiteliketar im going to guess and say you failed math =/

  • You people have to go through so much to try to prove to yourselves that god exists..

  • @Master8laster

    Brother,these are additional satisfactions for Muslims that their religion is right and that we take our religion very seriously.It is also a food for thought for those non-Muslims who would think and would like to do research.God invites people to think in religion.How an illiterate man more than 14 centuries ago could produce such a thing without cptrs etc.Think,brother,think.

  • @aamirmp1 I understand that additional satisfactions assist in one belief ,

    but one does have to ask whether or not the claims that are being made are legitimate or not.

    One cannot go believing anything a claim is making as long as it is supporting ones belief.

    Evidences like these are used to reinforce beliefs in peoples mind in many faiths.

    Take for example the bible code , are jews right to say that those miracles prove their faith

    It seems like there should be more concrete evidence.

  • Science without Islam is blind...

  • @SalahudinAlbani

    Science with Islam is not science.

  • @MesMorial

    OK. Its your opinion...you have right to think as you want...Peace ( Selam) to all mankind.

  • @SalahudinAlbani

    I would argue and deduce that it is not opinion, but peace to you.

  • @MesMorial To bad a russian scientist by the name of Ouspensky said the same thing and later proved otherwise and then converted to islam.

  • @asaaaaadAli123

    Actually Ouspensky said the opposite before we were provided with something by which to proclaim a particular verse a miracle. You would need to do better, particularly regarding the reverse logic in that Islam does not provide the proof or evidence that science does. Nor does it give us medical treatments or anything else you can think of (unless you like flies).

    So is science still science without Islam or are you just purporting what Ouspensky said?

  • @asaaaaadAli123

    Buddhism is science.

  • @asaaaaadAli123

    One more thing: I have been unable to find that more than one (Muslim and unreferenced) claim that Ouspensky was a Muslim.

  • @cqsr63

    Hello brother! how are ya?

    I knew that someone has flagged yo msg as spam.

    I just wanna share. Not blaming/judging anyone. I'm Muslim, My name is Abu Sinna, I'm from Malaysia.

    Just want you to know that in Muslims faith we believe that God (Allah) is Almighty. Nothing is equal to God. God has no families. We Muslims cannot interpret God as our human abilities. God is beyond human sense, The Greatest, The Creator of everything.

  • @0177231064

    yeah right you are ill-allah is beyond sense and that's why the quran, muhammad, and muslims make no sense

  • @hannahr77

    So what make "SENSE" to you?

    Tell me then..

  • @cqsr63

    Hello again! I'm sorry, i didn't get your details, what your religion is, thats why i greet you with "Hello!". If I know that you're a Muslim I will greet you with Salaam(a prayer for a Muslims brotherhood). You'll encounter some Muslims that "FLAG" your message. So i want you to know that maybe they didn't know how/forget to deal with non-Muslims faith by sharing what we put our faith in. I apologize for them. I'm not a scholar but I came in/with/for peace & love.

  • And one more thing: The Quran is unique in no way. Any poet could produce a better rhythm with ideas demonstrating an understanding of human feeling. The Quran has none of that, and yet you say that it is inimitable. I think that is sad. If you cling to your view, then either explain why it is great (the Arabic version) or laugh at someone with a narrower view. I'm a poet, and I've listened to portions of the Quran. I'm asking what is so good since it deviates?

  • And al-barr apparently doesn't even mean "land", but "righteous" since it's one of the names of God.

    Well it's up to Muslims to prove their claims or we'll do it for them :)

  • Ya they use al-barr 12 times and yabasa once to make 13.

    That's fake.

  • I'm guessing you're new to Islam. You will find it is spiritually empty when you look into it. Just letting you know it's not worth brain-washing yourself.

    Good luck searching.

  • Is it true that the word for land included in the count consists of 2 words?

    (berr, yabas)?

    If so, isn't it construed to suit the criteria?

  • Assuming accuracy, they are Uthman's miracle at best. Shia would not approve.

  • I was just checking (via the Yusuf Ali translation) the land/sea ration that Muslims claim. I'm only through the first 15 or so suras and land is mentioned 18 times as opposed to 13 times in the entire Quran. When there is discrepancy between the translations, one uses Earth and the other land. Interesting.

  • You can't check using translations, you have to count the actual Arabic word in the Quran.

  • I know. I found that the word 'month' (shahr) isn't mentioned 12 times. They included 'sharan' (months) in the count.

    I know someone who found a different count for the land and sea ratio, I can't find an exact demonstration. From experience, I wouldn't trust.

    I've also read of the deliberate miscounts performed by Khalifa to concoct the 19 code (esp with bismallah).

    Finally, the miracles in this video are debunked by the fact that the suras are not in their traditional order of revelation.

  • ummmm it would only be abou the quran in arabic LOL

  • Yes we're past that if you read the posts. The counts didn't match but if you can cerify then go ahead. If it's like 'months', it'll be doctored.

    Also, it's perfectly possible for someone to produce a sura like the Quran. The shortest sura has 3 ayat. 19ers believe in 2 false verses which were never noticed except after 1400 years. Explain how God's word can't be distinguished from man-made.

    You will find most Muslims actually need to think before they speak.

    Also go to Suralikeit.

  • @Sideriel umm no it is not possible as no one has been able to produce anything like it. So im sorry but facts defeat you... GOOD BYE AND STO STALKING ME

  • Stalkers don't say goodbye. Since you're a new inexperienced and most likely non-Arabic-speaking Muslim, you are not qualified to comment on a book you can neither read or understand, and that you have not completely read.

    Hence, your opinion here is invalid, and silly. I've actually listened to 3 suras of the Quran, and I ask again what is good about it? You can't answer, can you? If not, then laugh at yourself.

  • @Sideriel thats a big statement to make "stalkers don't say goodbye" lol, you would know ofcourse... Stalking would also be following someone around on youtube and commenting on there every post.. blah..

    I never said read threee sura's i said PRODUCE, hmm its like speaking to a child... Have you read the quran in full in arabic...?

  • "Every post"? No, just the ones to make you look at yourself. Clearly it worked.

    No I haven't read the Quran in Arabic, but I've listened to 3 suras in Arabic. I'm not the one making the claim, so your point please?

    If you think I am a child, then I admit I am 20. In which case you must be 13 and experiencing a spiritual crisis.

  • @Sideriel LOL no you seem to say that if you havn;t read the quran in arabic then you can not discuss anything about it LOL.... statements don't need a dictionary you fool, it would need the comprehension of a statement LOL..

    You claim to be a poet yet your poems are a joke LOL you think your a poet because you rhyme.? You claim that you have produced 3 suras like the quran. Please show the world as you are the first in 1400 years. You will be famous..

  • Well obviously I was right about the dictionary since you don't understand the meaning of "comprehension" and nor do you know how to spell "disgusted". :p Call me a fool if you can't think of anything better.

    Again I didn't write the suras (which proves that once more you jump to conclusions before reading the entirety of the source).

    If my poems are a joke, please produce 3 like them.

    Cheers, princess.

  • @Sideriel spelling test.? twinkle twinkle little star. bah bah black sheep. miss old marry mack... There you go 3 poems

  • In that case I should be famous.

    It's funny, because those poems would appeal to you. Therefore, you must be lying.

  • And if it's a big statement, then get a dictionary to help.

  • Ya it does make the Quran a laughing 'stock' (pun).

  • The scrolls found in yemen prove that the koran was redacted numerous times!! The present copy of the revised standard koran is a later edition!!

    What did muslims do when they realized that the manuscripts proved that the koran was man made? They closed the doors to the building where the scrolls are held and they burned some of the scrolls!! So much for scholarly endeavors and the search for truth!!

  • if the quran is man made, then pleASE PRODUCE 3 SURAS LIKE IT. if no human has been able to do it in 1400 years, i wonder what the hell muslims are thinking LOL... its funny how u can call the quran man made yet no one can produce 3 suras like t. when somone does, please let me know

  • I know how funny!! The koran is a nothing but a big rip off of the Jewish and Christian holy books. There is nothing unique or unusual about the koran unless you talk about the evil and perversions of islam.

    3 suras? Anyone can produce crap like this there is nothing special about the suras, lol! Just bc muslims say that no one can produce similar writings is just plain stupid. The koran is not poetic in any sense of the word and actually is pretty crude!

  • @legalrule well find me someone who has.... Find me someone who has been able to find a contradiction in the holly quran in the last 1400 years... believe what you like, you will spend your whole life trying to proove us wrong. You will never suceed. What a joke you are LOL..

  • btw are you a 19er or a Muslim?

  • This makes it obvious that Mohammed did not undertake the division into verses. As far as the ordering of the Suras is concerned this was done by Khalif Uthman (Information from "Dictionary of Islam", pages 489-492).The division of verses or ordering of Suras, which form the Structure of Quran was not originally there but introduced later. So any miracle nature attributed involving the number of Suras or verses is not part of Quran.

  • division of verses in the Quran is based on five different systems: the Kufah system, following the tradition of Ali; the Basra system, following Mohammed's companion Asim ibn Hajjaj; the Shami system of Syria used by Mohammed's companion Abdu'lla-h ibn Umar the Makkah system and the Madinah system.

  • ...and then (a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go on its course, but it will not be permitted, but it will be ordered to return whence it has come and so it will rise in the West. And that is the interpretation of the statement of Allah: "And the sun runs on its fixed course for a term appointed). This is the decree of (Allah) the All-Mighty, the All-Knowing."

  • Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Number 421

    "Narrated Abu Dharr: The prophet asked me at sunset, Do you know where the sun goes (at the time of sunset)?' I replied, Allah and his messenger know better.' He said, It goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates itself underneath the throne, and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted...

  • No-one has answered this yet, and Muslims claim to have won.

    [25:45] Have you not seen how your Lord designed the shadow? If He willed, He could have made it fixed, then we would have designed the sun accordingly.

    [25:46] But we designed it to move slowly.

    [25:47] He is the One who designed the night to be a cover, and for you to sleep and rest. And He made the day a resurrection.

    Geocentric universe. God would have to alter speed of Earth's rotation, not sun's orbit to alter length of day.

  • 67:5 And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire.

    Shooting stars are meteors, not stars. It's not referring to gamma bursts, as they are not permanent adornments.

    This is what they believed, confirmed by

    Sahih al-Muslim #5538

  • Am I missing something here, or is there not so much significance to begin with?

  • "abt ma poem, i assure u i kan definitely write better than u..."

    Captain Obvious at his best.

  • Harsh.

  • abt verifications, reliability and corruption

    y do u believe in buddhism when u dont even know what buddha said coz guess what? no body has his teachings in their original forms...y do u believe in a buddha when the two sects within the religion arent even sure who was he? a transcendental being or a man? y do u believe in something as far fetched as a cycle of rebirth?.....does science prove it or ur galen or Hippocrates said so?...y mordy y?

    but then, u haf retired...so i dont care....

  • replying that Buddhism is a culture, not a religion does not secure a winning argument, if u ever planned to haf one.....

    abt ma poem, i assure u i kan definitely write better than u.....tell me should i free lance or do u want a topic for me to write on.... p.s: dont worry, ull be on the losing side here as well...

  • mordy....hahahah...u leave agian n i am aure ull bounce bak again....i dont hafto say anything....our comments are still posted...ppl can read them n decide...anyways, u neva beat me buddh boy..if u want to live in that superfluous thought, then continue to do....the fact is u dont haf answers to any of ma questions...

  • So no, Arbab, I'm not satisfied.

    Also, referencing to other verses does not explain the verse I was questioning. In those verses, we don't know what the Quran is saying (but it could still be meteors...because no-one knew what meteors were back then).

    I'd agree with Muslims when they say: "Who cares?"

    But for a different reason, of course.

    A weak Hadith, I bet.

    This time I AM leaving. Bye Arbab.

    P.S. How to accept the 19 code when it's unverifiable, unreliable and corrupting to the Quran?

  • What your Lord has said? And they accordingly inform them what He says. Then the dwellers of heaven seek information from them until this information reaches the heaven of this world. In this process of transmission (the jinn snatches) what he manages to overhear and he carries it to his friends. And when the Angels see the jinn they attack them with meteors.

  • Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, issues Command when He decides to do a thing. Then (the Angels) supporting the Throne sing His glory, then sing the dwellers of heaven who are near to them until this glory of God reaches them who are in the heaven of this world. Then those who are near the supporters of the Throne ask these supporters of the Throne:

  • They said: Allah and His Messenger know best (the actual position), but we, however, used to say that that very night a great man had been born and a great man had died, whereupon Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) said:  (These meteors) are shot neither at the death of anyone nor on the birth of anyone.

  • Sahih al-Muslim #5538 informs us:

    As we were sitting during the night with Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him), a meteor shot gave a dazzling light. Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: What did you say in the pre-Islamic days when there was such a shot (of meteor)?

  • I'll answer all your questions on Buddhism:

    It doesn't matter. As tradition it became culture. It's not religion.

    I retired from the debate because I beat you. I came back to remind you. You forget a lot of things.

  • also, what the thng is abt me not telling khan that u had refuted points?...whihc ones did u refute n when did i reitire man.....go bak...ur comments abt retiring are still posted;p

  • Embryology.

    Also, I want your poem, liar.

  • well said khan abt ur refernce to the other verse....mordy are u satisfied now?

    where r my answers?

    searching for them?...trying to unearth some originals from egypt or nepal?or maybe Ceasar?

  • man...u come bak again...ohk itold u be4 either leave or stay n debate.....its not like u kan leave anytime u like n come bak again with the same perverse thought process of urs n repetitive question...all of ur claims haf been refuted mordy....y dont u satisfy our questions now?.....where r ur answers.....n anyways, told u be4 u haf already retired...i didnt...u left...remember?

    p.s: u gata do betta then this man, again bringing the shooting stars...u seriously make me laugh;p

  • That's a better explanation. We assume these lamps are in fact the stars? People refer to gamma bursts, but they do not permanently 'adorn' the lowest heaven (in fact they are often further than Andromeda).

  • We'll have to start ALL over again won't we? :p

  • Let me demonstrate.

    You never adequately answered this:

    13)Quran 67:5

    And we have, (from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps) (as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire.

    Shooting stars are meteors, not stars.

    I told you your explanation did not make sense. Please remind the world.

  • Oh, and I sent you the link about the Egyptian myth and everything else you asked DURING the debate. Please do not lie (again).

    Also, if a lot of people were following the debate, why weren't there any more visits to my video? (I don't tag it to anything relevant, but if they could see the debate in full, they would see how you failed).

    The thing is, it was you who retired by not telling Kahn that I'd refuted his points through you. Truth is so hard to see when blind, isn't it?

  • I already stopped you Arbab. You'd have to lie to convince people. If you can't WIN the argument whilst claiming Truth, you've lost.

    I'm posting this to make people think before they become brainwashed ESPECIALLY by you.

    Were those who sent you emails Muslims by any chance?

  • anyways, we will continue to show the light of our truth to evry1......dare to stop us?

    p.s: i haf been receiving mails from evry1 who followed our debate for five continuous days telling me how u were countered, ur points refuted n in the end, when ma time came, u just retired... dat is ppl's verdict n didnt i tell you, alot of ppl were following our debate...

    anyways, u kant stop khan neither me....this video is abt the Koran and this is an open comments page....so, 20-buddha boy, keep out.

  • mord: u haf already retired.....Didnt u say that yesterday? n even day be 4 that?...now go n shoot a pali in nepal......its an open page n we can write what we can....do not bounce bak again...ur already gone

    as for ur accusation regarding copy-pasting, i always mentioned the source with the exact page number,book n author...u just copied facts frm other ppl's comments(wow) and other websites withour even mentioning the source unless asked(remember the egyptian pointer)

  • And Arbab I'm 20 too. I just felt older next to you.

  • P.S. Kahn, do not talk about showing the light to ignorant people. What's light to you is delusion to others.

    Your truth lost the argument, and opinions of historically ill-informed scientists who don't convert to Islam is not justification for claiming that you know Truth.

    You even claim to know Nirvana. From now, keep your opinion to yourself unless you want to lose a debate in private messaging.

    i.e. Keep your Truth to yourself unless it learns to win an argument.

    Regards.

  • If you wish to continue to taunt, then PM me and there will be no help for either.

    Peace.

  • Do not try to claim the high-ground again.

  • Ok, much self-justification from you both to clean up the mess.

    I was amused Khan that you accuse me of copy-pasting when in fact the whole debate was like that.

    Your reference

    [RIK VEDA 10-173-4]

    You can come and go as you please, but if you think you can accuse me of lying when in fact it was you who were ignorant of the debate, then please look at yourself.

    That is where you are wrong. Accept that.

    Please accuse Arbab of copy-pasting. Most of it was. Do it, or be a hypocrite.

  • n a recent poll in the (US), 100,000 people per year in America alone, are converting to Islam. For every 1 male convert to Islam, 4 females convert to Islam,

    N I ASSURE WE WILL TAKE THE LIGHT OF OUR MIRACLE TO ALL NOOKS N CRANNIES OF THE WORLD....THIS IS HOW THE DEBATE STARTED N THIS IS WHERE IT ENDS....

  • always being outsmarted by a twenty year old( since u refer to my age with much contempt)..i ask u to keep a vigilant eye on the times to come....it is third age og expansion of Islam..our word is spreading from the Americas to Mozabique to Argentinas...

    Islam is the fastest spreading religion on the planet......

    According to "The Almanac Book of Facts", the population increased 137% within the past decade, Christianity increased 46%, while Islam increased 235%.

  • i dont proclaim victory....all Victroy Belongs to Allah, the Sustainer of the worlds n mine as well as ur Creator....

    i leave that for the times to come....for the ppl who read our debate to decide....(there wer many, i guarantee you)...

    one last word: it was neva my intention to abuse Buddha,ma reaction was in order to teach u a lesson to respect ppl's religions...

    u were as much my waste of time too..maybe more..but at least, i go out with one satisfaction: i made u retire.....u fort feited

  • neither did u haf the explanation for the cycle or rebirth that buddhism preaches....that how we act in this life, we become that in the next....a man acting like a greedy dog becoming a dog in the next life as in...

    since u were such a man of science, i told u to come with rational n scientific answers to all these questions.... u laid all ur scientific analysis on the KORAN, when it is ur turn u leave....

  • finally, when i asked u questions abt ur own religious philosophy of Buddhism, u dont answer...questions as vital as why were Buddha's teachings written down 400 years after his death, y was Sanskrit text now written down into a canon, y did buddha inculcate a philosphy of freeing oneself of desire when lots of desires (such as desire to marry, haf children etc) haf positive connotations..n y idid the mahayana sect thoguht buddha to be a god while hinayana did not think so: u had no answers

  • n the three veils..the two seed theory...all of these i presented, u continued to dismiss them through ur own interpertations of arabic words,(remember the alaq argument AND nuun gunah argument), ur one translation of yusuf ali compared to my translations ranging from Syed Ameer Ali to Pickthall to Virginia University database...to Shiekh abu-al-Ala mAUDUDI... also, u conceded the fact that u dont know arabic but still u persisted in defining arabic words for us...

  • neither did u haf the answer of galen's work being translated into arabic in late eight century 200 years after Koran was revealed...or the fact that Moore still refers to Koranic embryology in his eight textbook edn....

    then, u came up with the desire to challenge Koranic eloquence..when i asked u, shud i put up ur poetry on this page, so we could compare , u had no answer....

    then from scientific facts ranging from the concept of black holes, expansion of universe, big bang and big punture,

  • i always presented u with Western insights so that u cannot complain that these were written by Moslems, n hence, ought to be bias....

    then u moved on to the arguement of attacking Koranic sanctity...when i showed to you through academic evidence n pratcial evidence that 2 original copeis of the Koran, prepared during Uthman's time can be found in madinah and tashkent today and the treaty of versailles clause coupled with muir and cragg pointers, u had no answer....

  • when my arabic linguistics beat u in that.....started to whimsy retorts of abusing...when ur own abuses met with stinging remarks of mine (u started it anyways), u then attacked the morality of the Prophet's life...when i mentioned all the resources from academics, u today dismissed them all as meaningless.....even acclaimed academics like Kenneth Cragg, Hitti, Armstrong....

  • tsk tsk tsk mordegast......after all this while denating, what u come up with: ur same ignorant self-centric attitude.....u started with claiming lots of astronomical n embryonic fallacies in the Kora.....the facts that were right in the Koran u attributed to Galen, Hippocrates, Cleopatra( that still mskes me laugh), Ceasar, Egyptians n Sumerians....

    when each n evry one of ur argument was countered through solid evidence, u turned to ur own interpretations of Koranic words....

  • P.S. I answered your questions about Buddhism.

    You'll understand someday. I promise.

  • If you wonder why I'm leaving, don' think it's because I lost.

    Blame Kahn for interfering and yourself for being an angry little 20 year old boy.

    I'm sorry, but it's true.

    I better let you lick your wounds. Grow up and get over yourself.

    Goodbye.

  • You post a lot of references, but that is not material for a debate. It's the errors that neither of you can answer.

    You take what you want from each source, and can't even sustain a focussed argument.

    I have pointed out many errors in the Quran, and you have not refuted them.

    Therefore, the Quran is false. Thankyou for your time.

  • You are self-deluded and are not worth my time. However I'll send you everything you need.

    I could answer all of your questions about Buddhism but you wouldn't understand until your got over yourself. I'm happy enough to know you have no argument.

    Your prophet was a lying murderer according to your own evidence.

  • Arabab I beat you. I was debating you and beating you badly. Then you needed some help, but Khan didn't read when I told him to leave.

    You say 'WE always refute ur questions'... I thought this was a debate you fool.

    The Quran says all of Pharaoh's monuments built by him and his people we levelled.

    Did you not read what I wrote at all?

  • If you haven't grasped Buddhism yet, then go and research yourself. Buddhists don't worship.

    Nirvana is the result of ceasing to attach yourself to things like materials and religion. Life is about being happy, and therefore you have to accept the reality of not only life, but death.

  • p.s: come up with ur answers.mordegast,we always refute ur questions one by one...now come up with answers to ours....

  • Statement of the Koran is in line with the fact found that Ramses II still exist in a form of a mummy. Ramses IIs mummy was found in 1881 among maintained 40 mummies in storage near Deir el-Bahari in Thebes. Buccaile (The Bible, the Quran and Science: The Holy scripture Examined in the Light of Modern Knowledge) correctly shows, that when the revelation came, the mummys existence had not already known.

  • kahn answered ur false claims regarding hadith with accurate resource indication....

    ya, i know, u would doubt the credibility of french academia coz u posi ur self to know evrything....the mummy of remuses 2 is the pharoah of Koran....

  • buddha said erase evry desire:there r some positive desires as well....marrying, having children, acquring knowledge etc...what abt those...moreover, where are the orignial teachings of buddha..sonce these were written down 400 years later, much manipulations must haf occured....ofcourse, all of ur answers must be supported by rational thought n scientific proofs....

    u still havnt told whether i shud put up ur poem over here so can compare it to the Koran.....

  • firstly,who is buddha:god or man?....there is self-defeating philosphy of buddhust tradition:one pointer says abandon desire, anotther says acquire these so n so traits for which u hafto haf desire? thirdly, why were teachings of buudha recorded 400 years after his death?...moving on, why hasnt the sanskirit text reduced to a canan pali law?...what is the buddhist concept of rebirth...u become a pig in next life if u act like one in this life..etc.

  • there is another by Hitti....ur new allegations of Propeht (pbuh) marriages n warfare will be answered....

    anyways, i haf indeed taught ur moth a lesson n so ,behave....

    now where r answers to ma questions i put up?

    u freakin scared to come up with sumthing...

    i will write them again here...

  • Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet, by Karen Armstrong

    Accessible and balanced biography of the Prophet Muhammad in English. From the author of "A History of God," "The Battle for God," and "Islam: A Short History."

    The Life of the Last Prophet, by Yusuf Islam

    Audio biography of the Prophet Muhammad, narrated by Yusuf Islam (formerly known as Cat Stevens).

  • now coming again to ur "new" critics abt life of Mohammed(pbuh). told u be4 read be4 moving to comment in:

    i hope u would go through at least one of the following biographies:

    Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources, by Martin Lings

    A leading biography of the Prophet Muhammad, the only one based on Arabic sources of the 8th and 9th centuries. Considered one of the best-documented and clearly written biographies of Muhammad in the English language...

  • told u be4 muir is an Orientalist: his quote was directly taken so as to disprove ur claim of Koran being corrupted.....

    as for answering him, refer to Syed Ahmed Khan's book Essays on the Life of Muhammad and Subjects Subsidiary which was written as response to muir....

  • "7.137": And We made the people who were deemed weak to inherit the eastern lands and the western ones which We had blessed; and the good word of your Lord was fulfilled in the children of Israel because they bore up (sufferings) patiently; and We utterly destroyed what Firon and his people had wrought and what they built.

    this implied to what faroah has attained n his belongings.the pyramids of Egypt were not all built by remuses 2.n his dead body today is in the egyptian national museum.

  • Well I don't think it was Bucaille who stole the hair :p Nevertheless...

  • The Pharaoh miracle (by which Bucaille was amazed) disappears and turns against the Quran.

  • That very same book aimed to defend Bucaille against claims of maltreatment of the mummy, and to prove that Meneptah and Ramses were the Pharaohs of Moses' time. Therefore that book is further evidence against the Quran. I'll send the link.

  • A book review wrote:

    "Originally published in French in a slightly different version, Bucaille's "Mummies of the Pharaohs" has either lost something in translation, or the Academie Francaise, which awarded it the 1988 history prize, has standards that do not weigh historical and scientific evidence."

  • He was supposedly amazed by the Quran and its prediction of Pharaoh's body being saved. He thought the Pharaoh was Meneptah, son of Ramses II.

    7:137 states that Pharaoh's monuments were demolished.

    Yet monuments of both Pharaohs are still standing.

  • On the mummy's return to Cairo, reporters interviewed the French scientist about his findings. He stated that, inside the mummy, he had discovered a strange insect. The reporters laughed and called it a French insect. I seriously believe that sending the mummy of Ramses II to France was a big mistake.

    Numerous false ideas about the mummy have recently been published...."

  • Who was it who started the 'science and Quran' facade?

    It was Bucaille. Is he even a Muslim?

    Famous Egyptologist Zahi Hawass wrote:

    One of the scientists responsible for the mummy's examination was a very dishonest man. He stole strands of Ramses II's hair and kept them for himself. Later on, his son attempted to sell the strands of hair on the Internet. With the help of our ambassador to France, Nasser Kamel, we were able to put an end to this and return the strands of hair to Cairo.

  • Mountains are caused by instability. The Hindus also thought mountains were pegs. It's in the Rig Veda (will show when I get the extract)

    Mountainous areas are just as (if not more) susceptible to Earthquakes e.g. Himalayas.

  • Earth could not have formed without the gravity of the sun.

    Isn't Ghayn 'G' in Arabic?

  • It's not competition by name. The enemy of Islam is the fact that morality comes from us.

    You'll see it as a reflection in all who reflect.

    The rest is just accepting that the verses are vague. Bucaille started these scientific claims, and the rest just ride the horse.

    It is clear from context that the Earth was split from the heaven.

    THAT is the claim of the Big Bang in the Quran. There is no avoiding that fact. it doesn't say the stars were cleft from the heavens. Stars came after. Wrong.

  • Your own Hadiths admit your religion is false.

    I listened to a sura yesterday. Im glad I cant speak Arabic. Its repetition and meaning is atrocious. It was so irritating, I switched it off half-way through. Im not joking. Is this not proof? I want the poem you said youd written. I said in a day, or you can admit that youre a liar and leave for first insulting me. I thought your religion taught manners.

    Lesson learnt?

  • Uthmans belief in the incorrectness of Quran has been testified by his own son, Aban. We read in Tafseer Qurtubi Surah Taha, verse 63:

    Aban bin Uthman recited the cited verse [IN HATHANI LASAHIRANI] before his father Uthman. Uthman said: It is incorrect. Someone asked him: Why dont you correct it?. Uthman replied: Leave it there, it doesnt make any difference in respect of what is Halal and Haram.

  • Note: The words, and the afternoon prayer [WASALAT AL ASR], cannot be found in the verse 2:238 in the Quran compiled by Uthman.

  • Sahih Muslim: Sahih Muslim Book 004, Number 1316

    Abu Yunus, the freed slave of 'A'isha said: 'A'isha ordered me to transcribe a copy of the Qur'an for her and said: When you reach this verse: "Guard the prayers and the middle prayer" (ii. 238), inform me; so when I reached it, I informed her and she gave me dictation (like this): Guard the prayers and the middle prayer and the afternoon prayer, and stand up truly obedient to Allah. ' Aisha said: This is what I heard from the Messenger...

  • According to Imam of Nawasib Ibn Kathir, 6000 verses are authentic, remainder are doubtful

    To evidence this we have relied on the following esteemed books of Ahle Sunnah.

    Tafseer Ibn Kathir, Volume 1 page 7, number of verses

    Tafseer Qurtubi, Volume 1 page 65, number of verses

    Tafseer Ibn Kathir:

    The total number of verses Quranic verses are 6000. Disagreement remains about the remainder verses. There are various views and statements about them. One statement is that there are 6204 verses

  • Al-Daani said: They agreed that the number of verses of Quran are six thousand but they disagreed in what has been added further (to the Quran), some of them didn't add more whilst others said it was two hundred and four. Some said two hundred and fourteen, others said two hundred and nineteen. Some said two hundred and twenty five, others said two hundred and thirty six.

  • Disagreement amongst Sunni scholars over the number of Quranic verses:

    Allamah Jalaluddin Suyuti, whilst citing Sunni scholarly opinion from Sunni scholar Uthman bin Saeed bin Uthman Abu Amro al-Daani (d. 444 H), wrote [Al-Itqan fi Uloom al-Quran, Vol 1: p. 84]:

  • Arbab, you disappoint me.

    If you recall:

    The evidence of corruption is relevant to the time BEFORE Calipth Uthman.

    Additionally, I directed you to ONE video.

    Stop warning me :p

    Behold:

  • 6666 verse? The Devils book?

    Also, 36:40 is saying that the night cannot surpass the day. Do not twist. Your book is wrong.

  • Ok ,Khan, before you go:

    Kahn:

    Big Bang in Physics refers to the explosion of SPACE-TIME SINGULARITY (not matter). Matter was not even created when Big Bang happened. Earth was formed billions of years after the Big Bang. The Quranic verses are clearly referring to earth and sky being "joined" (which doesn't even have a common sense or scientific meaning) together and then being split apart (again no scientific or common sense meaning). Forget the Big Bang.

  • Whereas Jesus refused to use his divine powers for his personal advantage or for power, Mahomet often used his (false) claim of direct divine authorship of the Koran for purely personal ends (such as his various murders and marriages).

    So, according to your academic evidence, your prophet was awhat did I call him?

    No laughing matter. Is it?

    Oh, and if you threaten me one more time, your prophet will squeal. You challenged me to a debate, you became whiny first, so live with it.

  • William Muir had theories about Muhammad. If he is credible like you think, then you better read this:

    The book is William Muir's 1878 The Life of Mahomet, "The Belief of Mahomet in His Own Inspiration."

    After pointing out that Mahomet himself occasionally worried that it was genii who were speaking to him rather than God, Muir does something rather brilliant. He demonstrates, step by step, that Jesus' responses to the three temptations of Satan were the exact opposite of Mahomet's behavior.

  • And we all know Bucaille was biased. He thought the mummy of Meneptah/Ramses was the pharaoh of Moses time. That is impossible. Quran 7:137 says Allah demolished his monuments. They are still there.

  • Einstein, on Buddhism:

    Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and the spiritual, and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity.

  • Neither of you can CONFIRM a thing, so if you wish to spread your truth, I will make butter of you.

  • Khan, you are irrelevant. I change my statements? No, I am providing MORE reasons as to why smoke is unrelated to gas. If you learn to read, youll see. Try it.

    Impossibility of viewing early stages of embryo? Explain me Galen. I think we know the Qurans descriptions are not deep. I have been here. Furthermore, I am not debating you, and have answered the points you offered before you came.

    You were a part of the reason I left, yet you return to DEBATE.

  • If you read my page, youll understand why your questions are as insecure as your Quran.

  • Hence, Im a normal guy with enough sense to see that morality comes feeling a connection with the cosmos, and not relying on self-superiority as in Islam.

    Because, when we examine the evidence, the Quran is at odds not only with science, but morality.

    And if we have to learn Arabic to know what the Quran, than you can keep your book and its miracles. Because, the translations tell a different story.

  • When we sleep, our brain is in the right state to experience what is called sleep. But if the brain is destroyed, we no longer have a brain with which to experience death. This is what the Buddha meant by no-self.

    Buddhism is a guide. In fact, a good atheist may in fact be called a Buddhist. Buddhism is the middle path.

    One teaching is to refrain from accepting anything that doesnt agree with our reason, or common sense. Like the Quran.

  • Why are you asking those questions about Buddhism? I follow the teachings, not the religion. For instance: I dont believe in literal karmic rebirth. That was merely the common belief In India at the time. However, rebirth (as misnomer) is quite logical. When we die, our brain (switchboard) disintegrates. With our consciousness completely scattered, how can we be dead? But, a new consciousness will eventually form. It's not rebirth. Its a way of expressing the Buddhist concept of no-self.

  • Actually, as I just showed, the expansion of the universe is accelerating. Latest science says so.

    Furthermore, the Quran in its biased translation says that it is steadily expanding. This implies a constant rate of expansion. Wrong.

    About the images of the big crunch:

    The star will have swallowed Earth before then. So the images are wrong.

    Also, the universe would contract to a point, not be folded to a cylinder (pages of a book).

    And the sky cannot fall.

  • About Kawarra:

    Does one spin the head to apply the turban or does one wrap the cloth around a still head?

    Not a very good analogy.

    Rather, it implies yet again a geocentric system.

    Was that from storyofpakistan?

  • aslo:I THINK I HAF TAUGHT U NOW VERY WELL NEVA TO INSULT THE PROPEHT AGAIN...IF U DO, THERE R MANY MOSLEM FRIENDS OUT THERE WHO WILL MAKE LIFE MISERBALE FOR U...SO DEBATE AS DEBATES OUGHT TO BE...NO SNUGGLING N SIDE-KICKS..OTHERWISE ULL HAF UR OWN EYE BLACKENED....

  • p.s: so, now dont come up with any further tube videos mord......the rebuttal vis-a-vis academic evidence is quite punching.....

    secondly: as for ur challemge to take on the verse of the Koran: should i start posting ur poetry here...i ask u that coz its urs n i need to haf ur permission to do that...something of Moslem decency n need to take account of but of course, u dont care....

  • The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It is the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'.