When did Lucifer's fall happen in relation to creation? It seems like Lucifer was already here on earth when Genesis happened. What if there was a creation that Satan corrupted or perhaps was trampled and desecrated in the war against heaven. The bible uses verses like "You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit on the mount of assembly on the heights of Zaphon I will ascend to the tops of the clouds" was he on earth before Gen.?
The men in the video are giving the Catholic view of Genesis and Romans--a metaphorical interpretation, which is consistent with evolution (which the pope openly embraces)--not the Reformation.
In Calvinism, we hold to Scripture alone. We don't construct our theology from Scripture and modern science--but from Scripture alone! Ankerberg has a history of attacking Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide (he pushes lordships salvation), and the King James Bible (he likes the modern Catholic versions).
Creation is fiction:This is the teaching of amillenial covenant theology which is based on an allegorical interpretation of Scripture as opposed to a literal one This is the dominant teaching in most theological seminaries and has been for decades. As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global & the flood prevailed the highest peaks
It is perfectly valid to interpret the Genesis account as calling for long periods of time as opposed to 24-hour calendar days. It is also consistent with the record of nature. Because God is the creator of the universe, the record of nature and the record of Scripture must be in agreement.
"Because God is the creator of the universe, the record of nature and the record of Scripture must be in agreement."
They are in agreement, I think people under estimate the effects a world wide flood would have on nature. But Hugh Ross would tell you that the flood was local. Prost!
While there are some exceptions historically, the fact is that most Christian scholars considered that the Genesis narrative taught a 6 day creation. It is amusing to see Ankerberg act like "young earthers" are the bizarre fringe, when historically that is simply not the case; also, Ankerberg himself until very recently was a young earther....
God is a God of the living...Amen? So why would he want to see death during his creation? Wasn't it perfect? He told us it was the curse, thus destroying the perfection. I bet, he believes lions ate lambs in the beginning. If the Lord called each day perfect, it was perfect. The Holy Spirit grieves for us
When did Lucifer's fall happen in relation to creation? It seems like Lucifer was already here on earth when Genesis happened. What if there was a creation that Satan corrupted or perhaps was trampled and desecrated in the war against heaven. The bible uses verses like "You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit on the mount of assembly on the heights of Zaphon I will ascend to the tops of the clouds" was he on earth before Gen.?
grady5647 1 year ago
The men in the video are giving the Catholic view of Genesis and Romans--a metaphorical interpretation, which is consistent with evolution (which the pope openly embraces)--not the Reformation.
In Calvinism, we hold to Scripture alone. We don't construct our theology from Scripture and modern science--but from Scripture alone! Ankerberg has a history of attacking Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide (he pushes lordships salvation), and the King James Bible (he likes the modern Catholic versions).
RedBeetle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Creation is fiction:This is the teaching of amillenial covenant theology which is based on an allegorical interpretation of Scripture as opposed to a literal one This is the dominant teaching in most theological seminaries and has been for decades. As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global & the flood prevailed the highest peaks
lizazoon 1 year ago
It is perfectly valid to interpret the Genesis account as calling for long periods of time as opposed to 24-hour calendar days. It is also consistent with the record of nature. Because God is the creator of the universe, the record of nature and the record of Scripture must be in agreement.
markriser1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@markriser1
"Because God is the creator of the universe, the record of nature and the record of Scripture must be in agreement."
They are in agreement, I think people under estimate the effects a world wide flood would have on nature. But Hugh Ross would tell you that the flood was local. Prost!
Ironhoist 1 year ago
While there are some exceptions historically, the fact is that most Christian scholars considered that the Genesis narrative taught a 6 day creation. It is amusing to see Ankerberg act like "young earthers" are the bizarre fringe, when historically that is simply not the case; also, Ankerberg himself until very recently was a young earther....
ytuseruber 1 year ago 2
Some people look at the world and interpret the bible and some look at the bible to interpret the world. The error is in the former.
Your right uziel187, God is the God of the living, AMEN
Ironhoist 1 year ago
God is a God of the living...Amen? So why would he want to see death during his creation? Wasn't it perfect? He told us it was the curse, thus destroying the perfection. I bet, he believes lions ate lambs in the beginning. If the Lord called each day perfect, it was perfect. The Holy Spirit grieves for us
uziel187 1 year ago