36 feet tall, hmm? Right... AND where are the bones now?
All this stuff you are saying, and what do I find? Second and third hand stories. He said a giant was found. In Carthage a giant was found. Blah blah blah. She said. He said.
People have been saying for 2000 years that the Rapture is next week. Chirp. Chirp. Chirp.
"I do not attempt to demean you by saying this..."
Don't worry about that Stu, you can say what ever is on your mind. I have respect for your passion. I have no doubt you believe strongly in what you are saying.
"...those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence."
When you show me skeletons of giants that stand up to scientific scrutiny I will believe you.
The funny thing is Hitch; they interpreted many of the large bones found by secular archaeologists as animal bones just because of their size. However, upon closer scientific scrutiny by forensic scientists the determination became that the bones were human. You will want this book as soon as it is available.
Dye is a RAVING LOON. No scientist would ever make such bizarre claims about early humanity without truckloads of evidence. If he's writing a book on giants, let's see the evidence.
Correction. No EMPIRICAL scientist would ever make, blah, blah. As for the book, we are putting it together now with plenty evidence. However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit. One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. - James Watson
"However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit."
I am happy to look at any evidence you have, but the claims you are making are quite extraordinary. I surprised you are the only researcher who has turned up such evidence. I would think any anthropologist or palaeontologist who discovered such evidence would report it. If you can show me giant human skeletons that survive scientific scrutiny , I will be impressed.
I do not attempt to demean you by saying this, but those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence. Because their livelihood depends upon the spread of empirical science and Darwinism, the political ramifications of these kinds of discoveries lead to rejection of empirical evidence not discovered by empirical scientists. It means that what is being learned from and taught in textbooks is incorrect.
Of course, I know what those terms mean. That is why I use them. If you want to know, whether we agree or not as to what they mean, then maybe you should define them to see if we are on the same page. You are the expert. .
No, I do think anyone worships Evolution...Evolution is simply a scientific fact of how we came to be in the current form we enjoy. Well, some of us find enjoyment in understanding the natural world in which we live and others are taught to think of themselves as worthless sinful beings in need of redemption. Out of which comes insane ideas like humans playing with dinosaurs and other laughable scenarios.
Microevolution can occur within a kind but not across kinds as in different breeds of dogs but they are still dogs. However there is no evidence that any macroevolution has ever taken place. Evolution is not a fact because you learned it in school. The theory exists only to perpetuate the myth that the Western European human is superior to all other humans thereby justifying colonialism and neo-colonialism, which if anything is a dominant social flaw in Western European culture.
"Microevolution can occur within a kind but not across kinds as in different breeds of dogs but they are still dogs."
If somehow all humans and dogs disappeared besides a single colony of great danes and a single colony of Shih Tzus they would be two different species of dogs. I don't think the Shih Tzus could breed with the Great Danes without human help.
evolution is not a fact it is a theory, and it realy shouldnt be. at best it is a hypothesis because of the wholes in the theory however so far no1 has come up with a better idea so we call it a theory
You will learn that pride is an enemy of God when you meet Him, and you will meet Him. My Bible tells me what is true and it will tell you what is true also if you knew how to study it.
Come on! You know that much of the Bible is untrue and it teaches hate when truly studied in it's entirty! Try studying the entire Old & New Testament and you will quickly learn its errors and its promotion of hate!
Need I remind you that the Bible was forced upon American slaves and that the Bible supports slavery?
We cant be talking about the same Bible. My Bible teaches love and mercies from cover to cover and within those 66 books, there are no errors. Sometimes a review of the Hebrew or Greek is beneficial, but there are no errors. Colonials forced the Bible on American slaves in the same arrogant, superior-thinking manner plaguing all institutions of higher learning that teach Darwinism. The difference is that the Bible is fact while Darwinism is a concocted theory with its roots in ungodly séances.
Now I understand why you do not understand all the evidence in support of Evolution, you dont even know what is in the Bible...I will be more than happy to embarrass you on your own video post by posting just a few verses of the Bible that are clearly NOT "teaching love & mercy". Regardless of whether you back translate the verses to Greek or Hebrew they tell the law of killing those who fail to believe, obey, or simply are different than those who authored the Bible! Killem all!
While you may be able to post text from the Bible, it will never support your arguments because you do not understand the context in which it was written. In fact, many Christians do not even understand the context of certain passages of scripture. Guess what? We can show you without brainwashing you the way Darwinists and atheists do. This is what is known as Gods grace.
LOL! Yeah religion does have the advantage of claiming those who criticize it do not understand it because they always change want scripture means to fit what their current world view may be.
Science on the other hand works off proof and observation. It changes with the "evidence" not with the times. The evidence supporting evolution is overwhelming! You choose not to look at the evidence and so you rot in the fantasy world of SkyDaddy worship!
Religion may have the advantage of which you claim. However, I am talking about a relationship. For this reason, though you may have read something in the Bible, you could never understand it without first having a relationship with God.
Do not think that faith does not apply to science and that science is infallible. It takes faith for a scientist to pursue a scientific theory and if science were infallible, 2 million people would not be dying each year from the use of prescription drugs.
A relationship with god? How about a relationship with the Flying Spaghetti Monster...All you have to do is have faith in FSM and ask for his forgiveness.
You see the whole "relationship" thing is simply a defense to what you know is Biblical errors!
I never said science was infallable. However, persuing a scientific theory is not done on faith, quite the opposite! If only you knew the basics of science you would not fear it...Science is not a religion or a path to Atheism. Keep that in mind.
The whole relationship thing as you put it is what is missing in order to begin to understand the mysteries of the Bible. This is why you see errors and not the truth. A worldwide cataclysmic flood destroyed all people with the exception of eight. Man also recorded the flood event, evident from the fossil record.
What you are really saying is put aside your common sense and believe in MAGIC!
Ignore the errors in the Bible and it becomes infallible!
There is not enough water on the plane to flood the earth...The 500 or so flood stories come from the end of the ice age when the oceans rose from melting ice...There is scientific proof of flooding once the ice age ended but not flooding of the entire planet! The evidence is not found in the fossil record, that makes no sense.
No, what I am saying is put aside your common sense and believe in Jesus Christ. The water that flooded the earth is now a part of the hydrologic cycle, the polar ice caps and the seas. The reason we find fossils around the world is that the limestone that buried the animals exists around the earth. 90% of the earths surface is sedimentary rock. That should at least give you a clue.
LOL! You obviously do not understand what you are talking about...I you were to melt all the ice caps and remove all the H20 from the atmosphere there would still be vast areas of land exposed! There is not enough water to flood the earth and the earth is around 4.5 BILLION trs old not 6000yrs.
You have spoken like a true evolutionist and with errors. The Bible has the account of which you speak but you do not understand because your heart is darkened and you have become vain in your imaginations. Do you understand that the earth was one Pangaea that separated into continents? Read Genesis 10:25. Did you know that it never rained until after the great flood. Read Genesis 2:5-6. It has been proven using your own inaccurate carbon dating that diamonds are only 6000 years old.
Right, and children played with dinosaurs! You are truly lost within the dark dark world of your own dogma. Tell Jesus I said I want the lava tub for 7 warmed up and ready to go upon my arrival in hell...Tell Jesus to be sure Satan follows my request or there will be HELL to pay!
Even if you were my worst enemy I would not want you to go there. Hell is a party that you and I arent invited to. The only way is to crash the party by being "the wicked" or those who "forget God," where the connotations of "forget" is "become oblivious to." Do you know anything about the Anastazi Indians ancient petroglyphs of dinosaurs around 1200 BC or the Chupicuaro Indians around 200 BC who buried dinosaur figurines with their dead? Be not deceived, God is not mocked.
We are all oblivious to a mythical entity...I really do feel sorry for you and the fact that you are so easily influenced to believe the myths you do.
Feeling sorry for me is not legitimate. To feel sorry for someone, one has to have compassion. In order to have compassion one has to have love. In order to have love one has to know God because God is love. 1 John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. Sir, it has become obvious that you do not know what you are saying and you have just succeeded in embarrassing yourself. Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation
That is exactly why I feel sorry for you! You do not have a clue about humanity and how we humans act. I understand you must lie to yourself in order to feel comfortable with your superstitions but this leaves you blind to most of the world.
I really do feel sorry for you! You have built this little box in which you choose to live and that is your choice. I think it is really sad!
2 Peter 3:5-7 (NKJV) For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. Stay on point. This isn't about me or you.
"evolution is not a fact it is a theory, and it realy shouldnt be."
- Actually, the fact of evolution and the theory of evolution are 2 different things.
The fact of evolution is the change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation. This includes the history of these changes in genetics and the fossil record.
The theory of evolution is a description of how these changes occur. The theory allows us to make predictions about facts we have not discovered yet and test them.
First of all the theory of evolution is not a fact, it is a theory that maybe you have accepted as fact though there is no evidence of any type of macroevolution in the earth. Second, how can anyone who believes they were created in the image of God think of themselves as worthless? It is social Darwinists who think of themselves as worthless by thinking they are related to apes. Anyway, apes aren't very good at playing bridge.
Just continue using rhetorical fallacies, name-calling and the personal attack ad hominem. It's what you do best. I do not expect anyone of you will present a decent argument.
He is using the same arguments that have been used time and time again. The crystalline vapor canopy is physically impossible, and even if it did exist, the destruction of such a construct would kill EVERY living thing on the planet either by boiling them alive or explosive decompression.
His giant human evidence are from hoaxes that have been known to be hoaxes for years and in some cases, decades. The Paluxy Man Tracks and the several claims of giant human skeletons have all been debunked.
And god said Nothing, zilch , NADA.
lizazoon 1 year ago
36 feet tall, hmm? Right... AND where are the bones now?
All this stuff you are saying, and what do I find? Second and third hand stories. He said a giant was found. In Carthage a giant was found. Blah blah blah. She said. He said.
People have been saying for 2000 years that the Rapture is next week. Chirp. Chirp. Chirp.
fastfashn 2 years ago
Those were not ancient giants, they were giants who died in the fight with He Who Must not be Named. Gods man, haven't you read Harry Potter?
fastfashn 2 years ago
"I do not attempt to demean you by saying this..."
Don't worry about that Stu, you can say what ever is on your mind. I have respect for your passion. I have no doubt you believe strongly in what you are saying.
"...those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence."
When you show me skeletons of giants that stand up to scientific scrutiny I will believe you.
dlhitch2007 2 years ago
The funny thing is Hitch; they interpreted many of the large bones found by secular archaeologists as animal bones just because of their size. However, upon closer scientific scrutiny by forensic scientists the determination became that the bones were human. You will want this book as soon as it is available.
stubabyq 2 years ago
Dye is a RAVING LOON. No scientist would ever make such bizarre claims about early humanity without truckloads of evidence. If he's writing a book on giants, let's see the evidence.
dlhitch2007 2 years ago
Correction. No EMPIRICAL scientist would ever make, blah, blah. As for the book, we are putting it together now with plenty evidence. However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit. One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. - James Watson
stubabyq 2 years ago
"However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit."
I am happy to look at any evidence you have, but the claims you are making are quite extraordinary. I surprised you are the only researcher who has turned up such evidence. I would think any anthropologist or palaeontologist who discovered such evidence would report it. If you can show me giant human skeletons that survive scientific scrutiny , I will be impressed.
dlhitch2007 2 years ago
I do not attempt to demean you by saying this, but those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence. Because their livelihood depends upon the spread of empirical science and Darwinism, the political ramifications of these kinds of discoveries lead to rejection of empirical evidence not discovered by empirical scientists. It means that what is being learned from and taught in textbooks is incorrect.
stubabyq 2 years ago
Of course, I know what those terms mean. That is why I use them. If you want to know, whether we agree or not as to what they mean, then maybe you should define them to see if we are on the same page. You are the expert. .
stubabyq 3 years ago
Sky Daddy worship really makes people reach for incredibly insane ideas!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
Sky Daddy worship. That is downright cute. I guess that makes you a self-made man who worships his creator.
stubabyq 3 years ago
No, I do think anyone worships Evolution...Evolution is simply a scientific fact of how we came to be in the current form we enjoy. Well, some of us find enjoyment in understanding the natural world in which we live and others are taught to think of themselves as worthless sinful beings in need of redemption. Out of which comes insane ideas like humans playing with dinosaurs and other laughable scenarios.
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
"Evolution is simply a scientific fact of how we came to be in the current form we enjoy."
- I think you are confusing the theory of evolution with the fact of evolution.
The fact is the "what", in this case the observable natural process of evolution and the evidence of it's occurrence.
The theory is the "how", in this case the series of evolutionary steps, the causes, and what we would expect to see in intermediary steps.
Atriviality 3 years ago
You are correct...Sorry for the error!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
Microevolution can occur within a kind but not across kinds as in different breeds of dogs but they are still dogs. However there is no evidence that any macroevolution has ever taken place. Evolution is not a fact because you learned it in school. The theory exists only to perpetuate the myth that the Western European human is superior to all other humans thereby justifying colonialism and neo-colonialism, which if anything is a dominant social flaw in Western European culture.
stubabyq 3 years ago
Before we continue the conversation, I'd like you to succinctly define the following terms you have used so there is no misunderstanding:
- microevolution
- kind
- macroevolution
- evolution
Atriviality 3 years ago
"Microevolution can occur within a kind but not across kinds as in different breeds of dogs but they are still dogs."
If somehow all humans and dogs disappeared besides a single colony of great danes and a single colony of Shih Tzus they would be two different species of dogs. I don't think the Shih Tzus could breed with the Great Danes without human help.
dlhitch2007 2 years ago
evolution is not a fact it is a theory, and it realy shouldnt be. at best it is a hypothesis because of the wholes in the theory however so far no1 has come up with a better idea so we call it a theory
fireseraph7 3 years ago
Are you proud of your ignorance?
...Or is that what your church tells you is true?
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
You will learn that pride is an enemy of God when you meet Him, and you will meet Him. My Bible tells me what is true and it will tell you what is true also if you knew how to study it.
stubabyq 3 years ago
Come on! You know that much of the Bible is untrue and it teaches hate when truly studied in it's entirty! Try studying the entire Old & New Testament and you will quickly learn its errors and its promotion of hate!
Need I remind you that the Bible was forced upon American slaves and that the Bible supports slavery?
Think about it!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
We cant be talking about the same Bible. My Bible teaches love and mercies from cover to cover and within those 66 books, there are no errors. Sometimes a review of the Hebrew or Greek is beneficial, but there are no errors. Colonials forced the Bible on American slaves in the same arrogant, superior-thinking manner plaguing all institutions of higher learning that teach Darwinism. The difference is that the Bible is fact while Darwinism is a concocted theory with its roots in ungodly séances.
stubabyq 3 years ago
LOL!
Now I understand why you do not understand all the evidence in support of Evolution, you dont even know what is in the Bible...I will be more than happy to embarrass you on your own video post by posting just a few verses of the Bible that are clearly NOT "teaching love & mercy". Regardless of whether you back translate the verses to Greek or Hebrew they tell the law of killing those who fail to believe, obey, or simply are different than those who authored the Bible! Killem all!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
While you may be able to post text from the Bible, it will never support your arguments because you do not understand the context in which it was written. In fact, many Christians do not even understand the context of certain passages of scripture. Guess what? We can show you without brainwashing you the way Darwinists and atheists do. This is what is known as Gods grace.
stubabyq 3 years ago
LOL! Yeah religion does have the advantage of claiming those who criticize it do not understand it because they always change want scripture means to fit what their current world view may be.
Science on the other hand works off proof and observation. It changes with the "evidence" not with the times. The evidence supporting evolution is overwhelming! You choose not to look at the evidence and so you rot in the fantasy world of SkyDaddy worship!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
Religion may have the advantage of which you claim. However, I am talking about a relationship. For this reason, though you may have read something in the Bible, you could never understand it without first having a relationship with God.
Do not think that faith does not apply to science and that science is infallible. It takes faith for a scientist to pursue a scientific theory and if science were infallible, 2 million people would not be dying each year from the use of prescription drugs.
stubabyq 3 years ago
A relationship with god? How about a relationship with the Flying Spaghetti Monster...All you have to do is have faith in FSM and ask for his forgiveness.
You see the whole "relationship" thing is simply a defense to what you know is Biblical errors!
I never said science was infallable. However, persuing a scientific theory is not done on faith, quite the opposite! If only you knew the basics of science you would not fear it...Science is not a religion or a path to Atheism. Keep that in mind.
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
The whole relationship thing as you put it is what is missing in order to begin to understand the mysteries of the Bible. This is why you see errors and not the truth. A worldwide cataclysmic flood destroyed all people with the exception of eight. Man also recorded the flood event, evident from the fossil record.
stubabyq 3 years ago
What you are really saying is put aside your common sense and believe in MAGIC!
Ignore the errors in the Bible and it becomes infallible!
There is not enough water on the plane to flood the earth...The 500 or so flood stories come from the end of the ice age when the oceans rose from melting ice...There is scientific proof of flooding once the ice age ended but not flooding of the entire planet! The evidence is not found in the fossil record, that makes no sense.
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
No, what I am saying is put aside your common sense and believe in Jesus Christ. The water that flooded the earth is now a part of the hydrologic cycle, the polar ice caps and the seas. The reason we find fossils around the world is that the limestone that buried the animals exists around the earth. 90% of the earths surface is sedimentary rock. That should at least give you a clue.
stubabyq 3 years ago
LOL! You obviously do not understand what you are talking about...I you were to melt all the ice caps and remove all the H20 from the atmosphere there would still be vast areas of land exposed! There is not enough water to flood the earth and the earth is around 4.5 BILLION trs old not 6000yrs.
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
You have spoken like a true evolutionist and with errors. The Bible has the account of which you speak but you do not understand because your heart is darkened and you have become vain in your imaginations. Do you understand that the earth was one Pangaea that separated into continents? Read Genesis 10:25. Did you know that it never rained until after the great flood. Read Genesis 2:5-6. It has been proven using your own inaccurate carbon dating that diamonds are only 6000 years old.
stubabyq 3 years ago
Right, and children played with dinosaurs! You are truly lost within the dark dark world of your own dogma. Tell Jesus I said I want the lava tub for 7 warmed up and ready to go upon my arrival in hell...Tell Jesus to be sure Satan follows my request or there will be HELL to pay!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
Even if you were my worst enemy I would not want you to go there. Hell is a party that you and I arent invited to. The only way is to crash the party by being "the wicked" or those who "forget God," where the connotations of "forget" is "become oblivious to." Do you know anything about the Anastazi Indians ancient petroglyphs of dinosaurs around 1200 BC or the Chupicuaro Indians around 200 BC who buried dinosaur figurines with their dead? Be not deceived, God is not mocked.
stubabyq 3 years ago
We are all oblivious to a mythical entity...I really do feel sorry for you and the fact that you are so easily influenced to believe the myths you do.
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
Feeling sorry for me is not legitimate. To feel sorry for someone, one has to have compassion. In order to have compassion one has to have love. In order to have love one has to know God because God is love. 1 John 4:8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love. Sir, it has become obvious that you do not know what you are saying and you have just succeeded in embarrassing yourself. Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation
stubabyq 3 years ago
That is exactly why I feel sorry for you! You do not have a clue about humanity and how we humans act. I understand you must lie to yourself in order to feel comfortable with your superstitions but this leaves you blind to most of the world.
I really do feel sorry for you! You have built this little box in which you choose to live and that is your choice. I think it is really sad!
SkyDaddy7 3 years ago
2 Peter 3:5-7 (NKJV) For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. But the heavens and the earth which are now preserved by the same word, are reserved for fire until the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. Stay on point. This isn't about me or you.
stubabyq 3 years ago
"evolution is not a fact it is a theory, and it realy shouldnt be."
- Actually, the fact of evolution and the theory of evolution are 2 different things.
The fact of evolution is the change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation. This includes the history of these changes in genetics and the fossil record.
The theory of evolution is a description of how these changes occur. The theory allows us to make predictions about facts we have not discovered yet and test them.
Atriviality 3 years ago
First of all the theory of evolution is not a fact, it is a theory that maybe you have accepted as fact though there is no evidence of any type of macroevolution in the earth. Second, how can anyone who believes they were created in the image of God think of themselves as worthless? It is social Darwinists who think of themselves as worthless by thinking they are related to apes. Anyway, apes aren't very good at playing bridge.
stubabyq 3 years ago
The "theory of evolution" is a "theory", and the "fact of evolution" is a fact (hence the names).
Do you even know what "social Darwinists" or "apes" are?
You still have not defined:
- microevolution
- kind
- macroevolution
- evolution
Atriviality 3 years ago
Ok where is that bone from a 14 feet tall human.. this guy is full of something.. and it's not the holy spirit..
sigmet61 3 years ago
It's just something he picked up at Crazy Kent's House of Hovindisms. The same place he got his arguments. 2 for 1 sale.
Atriviality 3 years ago
Just continue using rhetorical fallacies, name-calling and the personal attack ad hominem. It's what you do best. I do not expect anyone of you will present a decent argument.
stubabyq 3 years ago
He is using the same arguments that have been used time and time again. The crystalline vapor canopy is physically impossible, and even if it did exist, the destruction of such a construct would kill EVERY living thing on the planet either by boiling them alive or explosive decompression.
His giant human evidence are from hoaxes that have been known to be hoaxes for years and in some cases, decades. The Paluxy Man Tracks and the several claims of giant human skeletons have all been debunked.
Atriviality 3 years ago