@travb35 extremely interesting. so does robert ambelain, father=judas of gamala. and it's the most plausible theory i have ever come about.
the discovery channel (or history channel) documentary about the tomb of jesus refers to mary as mariamna. this was also the name of herod's wife, in this theory=mary's half-sister, and she is referred to as "mary of cleopas"= cleopatra of jerusalem. maybe some historical characters were amalgamated.
@castelgandalf Yes Ralph Ellis has written books that look into the real historical truth behind the biblical texts. One startling fact is that the old testament heroes in reality were not poor and obscure, but were wealthy powerful Pharaohs! Also he says that Jesus was in fact Royal and wealthy, not some poor wanderer!
@travb35 thanx. if you haven't read ambelain, may i be so bold as to recomment him. 3 books originally in french, i read them in spanish. roughly translated: 1)jesus christ or the mortal secrets of the templars 2)the man who created jesus christ (paul) and 3) secrets of golgotha. i don't know if they are available in english, but they agree with jesus' royal lineage on both mary and judas' sides. it also theorizes the real reason for his crucifixion, & identifies paul as siimon magus.
@castelgandalf It's interesting that you mention Paul/Saul created Jesus, Ralph Ellis identifies Paul/Saul as the jewish historian Flavius Josephus. It seems to me that Flavius Josephus was just a cover name for Arrius Calpurnius Piso who authored/created the new testament(christianity)along with his family(wealthy roman aristocrats)by plagiarising the jewish religion after seeing that it's increasing popularity was becoming a threat to their religious and political power!
@travb35 hadnt heard the one about paul/saul=josephus
whoever he was, he certainly coopted early judaic xtianity.
ambelain finds that the peter v. paul and the paul v. simon magus (in rome) confrontations are identical. he identifies paul as not a jew but an idumean arab.
related point, i firmly believe the the hubbub raised by the church re "the final temptation of christ" was not because of the jesus-magdalene hallucination (strawman), but because of the paul/jesus confrontation.
Why the bible fail to name who the Pharaoh was, like they were born with the name Pharaoh. Pharaoh is a TITLE not a name. But since the bible has been rewritten and translated isn't safe to say we also have to translate the names as well.
They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice versa. Get an Encyclopedia of Egypt and compare the dates and events with biblical stories with the Factual Egyptian History.
They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice versa. Get an Encyclopedia of Egypt and compare the dates and events with biblical stories with the Factual Egyptian History.
The price of sin can only be paid one way, Blood . Jesus was a nazirite, as was Samson, John the baptist. Learn the word, it means more than just a place. Holy Spirit was recieved by the 11 apostles. After this impregnation they became fearless of death. As death was just the beginning. This spirit became flesh in Marys womb. This God spirit is what empowered Jesus, the apostles,and others before Christ. None except Jesus Christ had full measure.
@liellibg So you're saying that blood sacrifice has the ability to remove curses? What a bizarre and gruesome idea. Where did this superstition come from?
CLEOPATRA WAS NOT A PHARAOH!!!!!! She was a great political leader and did wonderful things for her country, but she was only a queen. She never took the royal beard. For info on a female pharaoh, check out Hatshepsut. She was Pharaoh! Queen Cleopatra VII was not!!!
This is outrageous and blasphemous, this could not have possibly be made by a christian or muslim. How can they possibly claim jesus is the son of a skank like cleopatra and had a roman father??? What next, I know why don't we take it to the next level and say he was Hitler, that's why he killed Jews, freaking disgusting!
The fact that his name in Egyptian is Esau, which means the son of Isis, and that it can be found in hieroglyphics should be enough right there to prove that it's just all more recycled bullshit.
@doobdoob2 Preach on. They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice verca.
In reference of Christ never dying on a cross according to the Catholic Knights of Camelot. Well, these guys were basically murders and manipulators that in on later times would even burn Bibles to keep people ignorant from knowing the Holy Ghost. So how can one believe the crew of liars that tried to hide the truth and even had people extorted by selling tickets out of Hell and then again selling to Heaven? When you see demons running from you in the name of Christ, then you'd know who's Christ
Though here there are assumptions parallels as of implying that Christ is linkrd on the long run to the Egyptian dynasty and from that line as far as to the NWO... This is another mix of facts with fiction since Christ clearly told Pilate that His kingdom wasn't from this world, therefore right there obviously there's not a link... and the Catholic church did not come to its' existence 'til the 392 to 397 AD...
Checkout Ralph Ellis, on YouTube, "King Jesus from Kam to Camelot".
Ellis identifies their great grandson, Jesus of Gamala, the only ever elected High Priest of Jerusalem, as the historical Jesus. However, the biblical Jesus is a fiction.
That Jesus was a consolidation of Gamala with the historical John the Baptist. This is why heresy (Cathars, Knights Templar, Johannites, etc.) was such a potent force in the Middle Ages. They knew Jesus fathered children & never died on the cross.
YEAH THIS MIGHT BE TRUE TO SOME BUT ALSO HE COULD BE CESAR BORGIA SON OF POPE ALEAXNDER THE VI THE EUROPEAN "JESUS" THE REAL CRIST IN THE BIBLE CAM THROUGH A TRIBE OF PEOPE WHO HAD COLOR AND WERNT EUROPEAN,BUT THE SO CALLED NEGROS YOU SEE HERE IN AMERICA,DO YOUR REAL SEARCH AND SEARCH OUT THE TRUTH! NOT THE LIE THAT IS BEING MADE TRUTH.....
Sto-p stop reading my post get off of YouTube turn off your computer and go outside and do some physical research go explore the world... Unless your broke and poor if that's the case then go to church sit down and let them finish brainwashing you you efin zombies wake up
I want to say one thing but I don't want a response I just want you to open your religiously brainwashed mind if it's possible... All main stream history is mostly false... you are only told 1% truth and the rest is all lies... Did you ever noticed that the poorer a person the more devoted they are to religion... Most wealthy and educated ppl don't buy into the religious bullshit because they know better than to believe in fairy tales... So if you want to know the truth about life mysteries sto
I love it when these "so called" historians will go through any length to make documentaries that spread propoganda in effort to make Jesus appear to be someone less than who he is. Jesus is the Son of God, the Savior of the world and was born of a virgin. The bible commands you to repent not to rewrite.
You mean just like the "propaganda" spread by Constantine 1 to conquer Rome? Have you ever seen the "symbol" used by these early Christians? It's a cross with a "P" on it. "P" for "Paul". It just goes to show you how *important* Jesus really was because apparently Paul was more special.
Regardless, science has already debunked all these fairy tales. They are nothing more than propaganda to brainwash gullible folks for power.
@ieremias01 Actually, Flavius Josephus, a jewish scholar of that time, made mention of a holy man named Jesus who was building a following. Josephus lived at the same time as Jesus.
For myself, I think Jesus was nothing more than a holy man with good press. The story of Isis and Horus, written in Egypt thousands of years prior to the birth of Jesus, was copied word for word into what is now known as the bible.
@islandsylph If he did, whatever he said in Antiquities 18 was erased and replaced with blatant Christian propaganda. Have you ever read Antiquities 18.3.3??? "...if it be lawful to call him a man..." "He was the Christ." "He appeared to them the third day..." "...and the tribe of Christians are not extinct unto this day."
And did they live at the same time? Jesus would have been nailed up and impaled on the cross no later than 36 CE. Josephus' lifetime was 37-101 CE.
@EdM021 There are quite a few discrepancies that have come to light and are being debated at present; one of them being the actual birth date of christ. It's all a fairy tale, so I really don't care when he lived or died.
@islandsylph That's why I said "would have lived." Because there is zero evidence outside the New Testament biographies and Christian forgeries in a few official histories that Jesus ever existed. And THOSE are so shoddily written that they cannot possibly help but fail to conceal the utter fictitiousness of the account. Another controversy concerns the existence of Nazareth and Bethlehem in the 1st Century CE. So it doen't matter to me either whether there was an actual Jesus or not.
does this then say the version we know in the bible is wrong? i always liked the story when he was 14 and arguing with the rabbis at the festival when his mum lost him, last story of him before he walks out of the desert at 30 and begins teaching... does this mean that is not true? what about the manger? oh no! dont know if i can take it
@robtherub it means that the name Jesus is really Pointing out where Christianity got its beliefs and ceremonies from. The #1 religion of ancient Rome. That of the sacrificed Lord and Savior Gaius Iulius Caesar was Christos.....They mix the life of Yahshua ben Yosef Life which really happen Israel.....Yahshua was a Prophet not a Messiah...thats what the Romans called him but he never said he was the Messiah.....
This is correct. Ptolemy the first was a general under Alexander and took control of Egypt during the "funeral games" following Alexanders death. Cleopatra was the last of the Hellenistic, (Greek), Ptolemaic dynasty and the last of the Pharohs.
Its very credible. It makes more sense why the roman empire would accept christianity. Not saying its is truth or false but it creates speculation and more investigation on my part. Thank you
I very much like this alternative point of view Jesus.
If we reject Dogma of the miracle of Jesus' Virgin birth, if Jesus was born around 2000 years ago, and if consider all the possible candidates to have given birth to Jesus, Cleopatra and Julius Ceaser would be on the list because they were alive 30 or 80 years before Jesus.
ITS LOOK MORE MOISES HISTORY THEN JESUS HISTORY WHEN moises was egyptian bla bla bla ect
1190kobra 1 week ago
I do not believe , this to be true, and i disagree.
aml395 3 weeks ago
Nicholas Notovitch seems to have been a fraud also...
travb35 4 weeks ago
this video is misleading-take note! Learn what Ralph Ellis actually says!
travb35 4 weeks ago
this video misquotes Ralph Ellis!
travb35 4 weeks ago
wow...ummm...cool
mzctfu 1 month ago
I do not agree with that.I detest that idea.
JustForBrieLarson 2 months ago
No blood sacrifice is good
JustForBrieLarson 2 months ago
I still do not fully believe any of it though till I find more proof.
JustForBrieLarson 2 months ago
This is very interesting
JustForBrieLarson 2 months ago
no the video isnt offending .but that DAMM MUSIC EPECISLLY ITH WOMAN SCREAMING THE DAMM VOCAL IN THE BACKGROUND SHAME IWANTEDTO HERAR THIS FILM
gell7 3 months ago
Ralph Ellis does not say that Caesarian was the historical Jesus. He says it was Jesus of Gamala, a descendant of Cleopatra.
travb35 3 months ago
@travb35 extremely interesting. so does robert ambelain, father=judas of gamala. and it's the most plausible theory i have ever come about.
the discovery channel (or history channel) documentary about the tomb of jesus refers to mary as mariamna. this was also the name of herod's wife, in this theory=mary's half-sister, and she is referred to as "mary of cleopas"= cleopatra of jerusalem. maybe some historical characters were amalgamated.
could you give more info about ralph ellis?
castelgandalf 2 months ago
@castelgandalf Yes Ralph Ellis has written books that look into the real historical truth behind the biblical texts. One startling fact is that the old testament heroes in reality were not poor and obscure, but were wealthy powerful Pharaohs! Also he says that Jesus was in fact Royal and wealthy, not some poor wanderer!
travb35 2 months ago
@travb35 thanx. if you haven't read ambelain, may i be so bold as to recomment him. 3 books originally in french, i read them in spanish. roughly translated: 1)jesus christ or the mortal secrets of the templars 2)the man who created jesus christ (paul) and 3) secrets of golgotha. i don't know if they are available in english, but they agree with jesus' royal lineage on both mary and judas' sides. it also theorizes the real reason for his crucifixion, & identifies paul as siimon magus.
castelgandalf 2 months ago
@castelgandalf It's interesting that you mention Paul/Saul created Jesus, Ralph Ellis identifies Paul/Saul as the jewish historian Flavius Josephus. It seems to me that Flavius Josephus was just a cover name for Arrius Calpurnius Piso who authored/created the new testament(christianity)along with his family(wealthy roman aristocrats)by plagiarising the jewish religion after seeing that it's increasing popularity was becoming a threat to their religious and political power!
travb35 2 months ago
@travb35 hadnt heard the one about paul/saul=josephus
whoever he was, he certainly coopted early judaic xtianity.
ambelain finds that the peter v. paul and the paul v. simon magus (in rome) confrontations are identical. he identifies paul as not a jew but an idumean arab.
related point, i firmly believe the the hubbub raised by the church re "the final temptation of christ" was not because of the jesus-magdalene hallucination (strawman), but because of the paul/jesus confrontation.
castelgandalf 2 months ago
Why the bible fail to name who the Pharaoh was, like they were born with the name Pharaoh. Pharaoh is a TITLE not a name. But since the bible has been rewritten and translated isn't safe to say we also have to translate the names as well.
trawillz 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice versa. Get an Encyclopedia of Egypt and compare the dates and events with biblical stories with the Factual Egyptian History.
trawillz 3 months ago
They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice versa. Get an Encyclopedia of Egypt and compare the dates and events with biblical stories with the Factual Egyptian History.
trawillz 3 months ago
The price of sin can only be paid one way, Blood . Jesus was a nazirite, as was Samson, John the baptist. Learn the word, it means more than just a place. Holy Spirit was recieved by the 11 apostles. After this impregnation they became fearless of death. As death was just the beginning. This spirit became flesh in Marys womb. This God spirit is what empowered Jesus, the apostles,and others before Christ. None except Jesus Christ had full measure.
liellibg 5 months ago
@liellibg So you're saying that blood sacrifice has the ability to remove curses? What a bizarre and gruesome idea. Where did this superstition come from?
spacecase8888 3 months ago
This is excellent, and accurate, historical insight
David63181 6 months ago
CLEOPATRA WAS NOT A PHARAOH!!!!!! She was a great political leader and did wonderful things for her country, but she was only a queen. She never took the royal beard. For info on a female pharaoh, check out Hatshepsut. She was Pharaoh! Queen Cleopatra VII was not!!!
LadyNightthorn 6 months ago
So is he the son or brother to ceasar? anyway hes the son of god its amazing what idiots dig up and paste together lol.
matrixlone 6 months ago in playlist religion
"puh-tollemy"?
JohnUyeno 7 months ago
@JohnUyeno Putomely of Garth
D0W666 6 months ago
Everybody in Denial.
lokithe1337 7 months ago
This is outrageous and blasphemous, this could not have possibly be made by a christian or muslim. How can they possibly claim jesus is the son of a skank like cleopatra and had a roman father??? What next, I know why don't we take it to the next level and say he was Hitler, that's why he killed Jews, freaking disgusting!
laintriga1 7 months ago
@laintriga1 thinking jesus will save you when god helps those who HELP THEMSELVES is blasphemous, idiot.
supermortalhuman 4 months ago
The fact that his name in Egyptian is Esau, which means the son of Isis, and that it can be found in hieroglyphics should be enough right there to prove that it's just all more recycled bullshit.
doobdoob2 8 months ago 5
@doobdoob2 Preach on. They need to just get a Egyptian Encyclopedia. It states it all. Like King Solomon=Pharaoh Siamon (Solomon= Sol+Omon=Sol+Amon, Sol=Sun, Amon/Amun/Amen the Sun God. Or even Moses=Pharaoh TuthMosis III, Or hebrews also were called Asiatics/Hyksos... The bible is nothing more than a hybrid of Christianity myth and Egyptian facts and beliefs, not vice verca.
trawillz 3 months ago
@doobdoob2 Jesus/Yeshua is the same name as Joshua.
spacecase8888 3 months ago
simply FUCKIN RETARDED
21scuderia 9 months ago
ALL FALSE
pumapunku1 9 months ago
@pumapunku1 yep its all conspiracy nutjob horse shit
21scuderia 9 months ago
In reference of Christ never dying on a cross according to the Catholic Knights of Camelot. Well, these guys were basically murders and manipulators that in on later times would even burn Bibles to keep people ignorant from knowing the Holy Ghost. So how can one believe the crew of liars that tried to hide the truth and even had people extorted by selling tickets out of Hell and then again selling to Heaven? When you see demons running from you in the name of Christ, then you'd know who's Christ
TribeAtLargePhracass 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Though here there are assumptions parallels as of implying that Christ is linkrd on the long run to the Egyptian dynasty and from that line as far as to the NWO... This is another mix of facts with fiction since Christ clearly told Pilate that His kingdom wasn't from this world, therefore right there obviously there's not a link... and the Catholic church did not come to its' existence 'til the 392 to 397 AD...
TribeAtLargePhracass 9 months ago
Comment removed
TribeAtLargePhracass 9 months ago
Checkout Ralph Ellis, on YouTube, "King Jesus from Kam to Camelot".
Ellis identifies their great grandson, Jesus of Gamala, the only ever elected High Priest of Jerusalem, as the historical Jesus. However, the biblical Jesus is a fiction.
That Jesus was a consolidation of Gamala with the historical John the Baptist. This is why heresy (Cathars, Knights Templar, Johannites, etc.) was such a potent force in the Middle Ages. They knew Jesus fathered children & never died on the cross.
bondurango 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not a myth:
wwwf4wpeaceDOTde
F...4 World peace by Cultural-Change, by Anti-Christa-Aisha-klein aka sun
Peace All
Inshallah
namAste
f4wpeace 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
makes my heart smile to read from so many people who will not be lied to .
rehabib2 1 year ago
YEAH THIS MIGHT BE TRUE TO SOME BUT ALSO HE COULD BE CESAR BORGIA SON OF POPE ALEAXNDER THE VI THE EUROPEAN "JESUS" THE REAL CRIST IN THE BIBLE CAM THROUGH A TRIBE OF PEOPE WHO HAD COLOR AND WERNT EUROPEAN,BUT THE SO CALLED NEGROS YOU SEE HERE IN AMERICA,DO YOUR REAL SEARCH AND SEARCH OUT THE TRUTH! NOT THE LIE THAT IS BEING MADE TRUTH.....
sabrom 1 year ago
Sto-p stop reading my post get off of YouTube turn off your computer and go outside and do some physical research go explore the world... Unless your broke and poor if that's the case then go to church sit down and let them finish brainwashing you you efin zombies wake up
KALIEFBARKSDALE 1 year ago
I want to say one thing but I don't want a response I just want you to open your religiously brainwashed mind if it's possible... All main stream history is mostly false... you are only told 1% truth and the rest is all lies... Did you ever noticed that the poorer a person the more devoted they are to religion... Most wealthy and educated ppl don't buy into the religious bullshit because they know better than to believe in fairy tales... So if you want to know the truth about life mysteries sto
KALIEFBARKSDALE 1 year ago
I love it when these "so called" historians will go through any length to make documentaries that spread propoganda in effort to make Jesus appear to be someone less than who he is. Jesus is the Son of God, the Savior of the world and was born of a virgin. The bible commands you to repent not to rewrite.
LenGarc 1 year ago
@LenGarc open you eyes tear your eyes away from that book that was translated by a king
EAsports93 1 year ago
@LenGarc
You mean just like the "propaganda" spread by Constantine 1 to conquer Rome? Have you ever seen the "symbol" used by these early Christians? It's a cross with a "P" on it. "P" for "Paul". It just goes to show you how *important* Jesus really was because apparently Paul was more special.
Regardless, science has already debunked all these fairy tales. They are nothing more than propaganda to brainwash gullible folks for power.
30lays 1 year ago
@LenGarc Your heart commands you to repent, when you should repent.
libertylives2 11 months ago
omg :o
xbellaxlatinax 1 year ago
the real fathet was marc anthony not julius cesar...
migu9999 1 year ago
Comment removed
ieremias01 1 year ago
All the good quotes I know about of the new testament seem to be known writings of the Budha 500 years BCE.
hankhonker 1 year ago
Caesar and Cleopatra could not possibly have been the parents of Jesus. Caesar died in 44 bc. Christ died in 30 ad. Do the math.
russellbor 1 year ago
@russellbor
You are right: Caesar is not the father.
But not because of the age and time difference.
But because Christianity like all religions are just fairy-tales created to brainwash people for power.
30lays 1 year ago
Comment removed
ieremias01 1 year ago
@ieremias01 Actually, Flavius Josephus, a jewish scholar of that time, made mention of a holy man named Jesus who was building a following. Josephus lived at the same time as Jesus.
For myself, I think Jesus was nothing more than a holy man with good press. The story of Isis and Horus, written in Egypt thousands of years prior to the birth of Jesus, was copied word for word into what is now known as the bible.
islandsylph 11 months ago
@islandsylph If he did, whatever he said in Antiquities 18 was erased and replaced with blatant Christian propaganda. Have you ever read Antiquities 18.3.3??? "...if it be lawful to call him a man..." "He was the Christ." "He appeared to them the third day..." "...and the tribe of Christians are not extinct unto this day."
And did they live at the same time? Jesus would have been nailed up and impaled on the cross no later than 36 CE. Josephus' lifetime was 37-101 CE.
EdM021 11 months ago
@EdM021 There are quite a few discrepancies that have come to light and are being debated at present; one of them being the actual birth date of christ. It's all a fairy tale, so I really don't care when he lived or died.
islandsylph 11 months ago
@islandsylph That's why I said "would have lived." Because there is zero evidence outside the New Testament biographies and Christian forgeries in a few official histories that Jesus ever existed. And THOSE are so shoddily written that they cannot possibly help but fail to conceal the utter fictitiousness of the account. Another controversy concerns the existence of Nazareth and Bethlehem in the 1st Century CE. So it doen't matter to me either whether there was an actual Jesus or not.
EdM021 11 months ago
@EdM021 Ah, sorry, I misread.:.serious headcold makes a person all foggy. :)
islandsylph 11 months ago
@islandsylph Thanks. I know how fooged up one can get with a serious headcold. I get those myself. I also have allergies, which do not help.
EdM021 11 months ago
does this then say the version we know in the bible is wrong? i always liked the story when he was 14 and arguing with the rabbis at the festival when his mum lost him, last story of him before he walks out of the desert at 30 and begins teaching... does this mean that is not true? what about the manger? oh no! dont know if i can take it
robtherub 2 years ago
@robtherub it means that the name Jesus is really Pointing out where Christianity got its beliefs and ceremonies from. The #1 religion of ancient Rome. That of the sacrificed Lord and Savior Gaius Iulius Caesar was Christos.....They mix the life of Yahshua ben Yosef Life which really happen Israel.....Yahshua was a Prophet not a Messiah...thats what the Romans called him but he never said he was the Messiah.....
hebrewmatrix 2 years ago
cleaopatra was greek though.
shawry86 2 years ago
cleopatra was ejyptian
shadow5477 2 years ago
um no she wasnt she was born there yes...but her families roots were put in power when alexander the great invaded....
shawry86 2 years ago
This is correct. Ptolemy the first was a general under Alexander and took control of Egypt during the "funeral games" following Alexanders death. Cleopatra was the last of the Hellenistic, (Greek), Ptolemaic dynasty and the last of the Pharohs.
russellbor 1 year ago
Ahha, now everything start to make sense why Jesus was the way he was in many many ways.
anuslee 2 years ago
Ah, finally, something that makes sense!! Now where did Cleopatra hide the Ark of the Covenant? I want some Starfire (ORME).
p8950 2 years ago
lol
shawry86 2 years ago
Its very credible. It makes more sense why the roman empire would accept christianity. Not saying its is truth or false but it creates speculation and more investigation on my part. Thank you
rb7magnetico 2 years ago
I very much like this alternative point of view Jesus.
If we reject Dogma of the miracle of Jesus' Virgin birth, if Jesus was born around 2000 years ago, and if consider all the possible candidates to have given birth to Jesus, Cleopatra and Julius Ceaser would be on the list because they were alive 30 or 80 years before Jesus.
But, that is as good as it gets so far.
However, I do think this is the truth.
Dharma2012 2 years ago