Added: 5 months ago
From: ronpaul
Views: 139,006
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (827)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You can't undo the past Ron Pauls forign policy is dumb for a superpower like America you can't have a world power without breaking a few heads. so vote for some one else who has a real plan not a dumb idea came up in 10 mintues!

  • If you think they are attacking us because we're free, let me ask you this. Why aren't they attacking Canada? Or France? Or Europe? Or Switzerland? Or Finland, or Denmark? Even Singapore?

    Why us?

    Because it has nothing to do with us being free. It has everything to do with us, being on their land, land they devoutly consider HOLY, and dictating to them like they are children. I don't blame them. Not one bit. They defend themselves, and we brand them as terrorists. It's fucking disgusting.

  • @UnknownXV they are terrorists killing their own people because it is in there fucking religion reform it guess what both Judaism and Christianity believes woman are inferior and shouldnt be allowed to learn Islam needs to be reformed and they are attacking Europe

  • This video is bullshit. Invading other countries and bombing their people while ignoring our own border makes us safer!

  • LoL @ the shills spam voting up dipshit comments. Mark them as spam people.

  • @Bikonito Which country in their perfect mind would invade the USA? Cmon, if a non-american like me can tell that is nobody in the world would do that, not even Russia, they would lose the war in a bad way.

  • No one will ever fuck with america if you just mind your own bussniess

  • @wholewheatgrains - excellent troll. You are a true professional.

  • dctriv the grass is always greener....

  • You Americans have such great ad campaigns. We in the UK get a little 2 minute plain chat from a politician.

  • @DCTriv Honestly, ours might be more entertaining and graphically interesting...but sometimes you need to have a 2 minute chat not devoid of facts or philosophical message.

  • "A veteran" who gets more money from the military than any other candidate, but the media doesn't talk about that. Makes me sick. How these draft/service dodging candidates can be considered as the Commander and Chief of the military is beyond me.

  • @Cadiville95 One does not have to be a military man to be a President however I get what you're saying. There's nothing worse on this God given earth than a chicken-hawk.

  • @Thejbirdy I don't think it should be a requirement to have served in the military to be president. I also think someone who was raised from a very young age in the U.S. should be able to be president. That being said, it should be the best candidate that becomes president. A candidate who has served in the military should get credit for doing so, and a chicken-hawk certainly would be less qualified for commander and chief of the military.

  • @Cadiville95 Absolutely agree here. I mean some of these contenders have a lot to be desired. I respect Ron Paul, a man who goes by the constitution and has remained consistent! How many politicians do that? He's a very likable guy, he really is. So proud I got to meet him. Gosh I hope he gets nominated. Thanks Cadiville95.

  • I think 1.25 hundred k views are too little, no? Let's all like, favorite, and share these Ron Paul ads if we want more people to be aware of his great policies.

  • This guy would be the biggest embarrassment to the republican party if the other candidates weren't so terrible.

  • Ron Paul is a great man.

  • If Thomas Edison didn't wear a helmet in case someone tried to hit him with a lighbulb... If Ben Franklin didn't wear a suit of armor in case someone tried to mug him with a lightning rod... If the Wright Brothers didn't live in mortal fear of kamikaze attacks... Why is the government scared out of its already limited wits about nukes? If we're so worried about Iranian nukes, then why did we invent them and tell the whole world how to make them? We have only ourselves to blame.

  • @lordvoldemuggle I'm uncomfortable with that wackjob Ahmadinejad having a nuke, but i'm even more uncomfortable with that wackjob Obama having more than a hundred thousand nukes. Also I can understand why Iran would want a nuke. They are surrounded by puppet states of the two biggest nuclear powers in the world, they are extremely close to Israel, we have warships in the gulf, have sanctions on them, and have thousands of nukes pointed at them.

  • "Once we have a strong economy, we'll want open borders, because we'll need those workers" -Ron Paul

  • @DecentralizedByGuilt

    he was talking about a guest worker program that already exists. He has a tendency to favor some forms of temporary immigration for employment purposes, but never permanent. This is what his history indicates. And as of now he is far less enthusiastic about any immigration. k ?

  • @Perseiden2 Actually that is the libertarian view. To one day have open borders. Meaning NO BORDERS. and he said that in 2008, okay.

  • @DecentralizedByGuilt I don't see how he has EVER said that.

    Provide the source to your claim, please. I am dead certain he isn't for "no borders."

  • @EternalLight569 It's the libertarian view. He said it last election at a rally in Texas. I'm not sure if I can find the video. I'll look. Do you search to, or are you guessing he never said that?

  • @EternalLight569 Just do a youtube search: "Ron Paul open borders" and you'll see stuff like this: /watch?v=ihDoUYaqhgM

  • Just donated $25 but Ron Paul's money bomb still short of its goal please donate on his website!

  • This is they type of videos the campaign needs to air!!!! Put this on loop in Iowa and NH! Stat!

  • @mhoyer01 with his popularity and the money hes been making campaigning, i think if he becomes the republican nominee his ads will blow all this media blackout bullshit of not covering him into the great frontier of space. id rather see this on tv than fox news talking about bachmann or mitt romney or god forbid newt gingrich...

  • Sounds kinda like a return to isolationism to me. And look at what that did to the US.

  • @pigsdofly6 Sorry, but it's only isolationism if you resort to protectionist trade policies, or simply not trading with anyone. Ron Paul would keep those avenues of trade open. Trading is ultimately the thing that toppled the Soviet Union, not our overseas adventures supporting the Taliban against them.

  • @pigsdofly6 Isolationism is to avoid other nations completely. Our policy now is more isolationist than Ron Paul's policy will be if he is elected because if we don't like someone we sanction them and completely avoid all diplomacy with them. Ron Paul will keep diplomatic ties with ALL nations and he will open all trade barriers to free trade. He is a non-interventionist, not an isolationist.

  • Comment removed

  • Ron Paul is the answer to the question: "How can we defend America against any kind of attack whether it be ground force or nuclear"

  • The #OccupyWallStreet Deception

    watch?v=mCcqOKQR0BY

    watch?v=tMNHDM-PCkc

    American Autumn Was An Inside Job

    watch?v=v7KKYIBAcFc

    watch?v=_7F94Y4m1dUx

  • @Peaver We're not even free, but even if we were this would have been an irrational answer. Anyone who thinks they just hate us for no good reason is either stupid, sadistic, or both.

  • @Peaver Tell it like it is man!

  • @Peaver Exactly. Enough intervention on behalf of giant corporations who pocket it for themselves and send jobs overseas.

    Ron Paul 2012

  • @Peaver I used to be stupid and be so blinded thinking that they're attacking USA because they're free but now I found Ron Paul. He changed the way I view things around the world.

  • Comment removed

  • @shotsky94 First of all, we have no business in the Arabian peninsula to begin with. Secondly, if we're afraid of countries with nuclear weapons, we should be more concerned with North Korea and China than Iran. Especially since BO seems intent on ticking the Chinese off so easily.

  • @Sistarovat Nobody touches North Korea again ever since it was confirmed that they had active nukes. That's what is essentially going to happen when Iran gets their nukes. And then when we leave Iraq next month, it gives Iran carte blanche to start gobbling up Iraq bit by bit. I actually agree with most of Obama's policy towards China. Try and contain their influence in the region without actually doing anything that could cause distress to diplomacy...

  • All I see on Fox News are dumb Rick Perry ads. Fox NEEDS to air Ron Paul ads.

  • I think Ron Paul would make a great president. Just by the things he says

  • Comment removed

  • @silverstreak492 Not just based on what he says. Every politician has a whole lot to say (even though most love to talk and talk without really saying anything at all). The thing about Dr. Paul is he actually practices what he preaches and it has been proven in the past time and time again.

  • Received an e-mail. Ron Paul needs "$1.2 million in this money bomb to pay for the all-out media and targeted voter mail blitz my campaign has planned."

    There's just a few hours left until Ron Paul's Veteran's Day Money Bomb ends! We're currently under $900,000! Spread the word! Every dollar counts!

    CBS News only gave Ron Paul 90 seconds out of an hour on national television! It was on foreign policy and national security. He has the most support from veterans, and we need to get the word out!

  • Awesome...

    Get 'em all Ron!

  • RON PAUL 2012 Vote for a modern day founding father!

  • I love how white folks like to talk about about muslims and sand niggers being a threat. I would like to take this time to reference a famous quote by a wise man..."but tell me..who blew up oklahoma?" muslims are not out to kill americans just for the hell of it like all the propaganda will lead you to believe...Ron Paul '12...what do we have to loose....

  • BEAUTIFUL <3

  • @WeedFlow420 A good 'ol American! A constitutionalist... :D

  • he never actuall says how he would protect the nation especially from radical jihadists

  • @shotsky94 considering the 'jihadists' are pissed about the CIA assassinating Arab leaders and U.S giving Trillions to Israel, I think they'd pretty much stop thinking about the US if Ron Paul pulled the troops out.

  • @pigeonpsycho I dont remember the US giving a trillion dollars to Israel. Can you back that ridiculous statement with anything like.....uh....facts.....Ron Paul has a nonchalant attitude towards the islamist threat facing the western world. And his solution for every military problem is the cliche "bring the troop home".....He's head is WAYYY in the sand!

  • @shotsky94 what's the middle east got to do with America? Yes get out. Yeah America has spent $3 trillion on israel since 1948, it's disgusting, they also have 400 nukes, these extremists need to fuck off

  • @shotsky94 How does antagonizing muslim countries protect us?

  • @truendymion Muslim governments that are protecting terrorists that want to blow up america. Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism against american troops in the middle east. Ron Paul's attitude is "sorry, its our fault"

  • @shotsky94 They don't want to blow up America (nor do they have the means). They want to fight against invaders of their homelands. Do you really think bombing them and killing them will make them hate America any less? How would you feel if China had military bases in America? I repeat: How does antagonizing Muslim countries protect America?

  • @truendymion America is not the invader. America is the liberator. Saddam was brutal dictator. After 9/11, Taliban didnt want to hand over Bin-Lade and AlQaeda senior officials. That's why we went in, in case you didnt know. Iran is a fanatical suicidal nation hellbent on getting nuclear capabilities. Iran wants to be a nuclear superpower. They are the NUMBER ONE state sponsor of terror in the middle east, and have killed more american soldiers than anyone else...

  • @shotsky94 Right how many dictators are there around the world brutalizing their own people and we decide to invade Iraq. Taliban and Bin Laden weren't even IN Iraq. The Bush Administration sold the American people on the war by claiming there were "Weapons of Mass Destruction" which turned out to be COMPLETELY FALSE! It was all propaganda to hide their true intentions. Bring the soldiers home and they'll stop dying.

  • @truendymion The world is better without evil Saddam gassing his own citizens. Iraq now has a democracy, and freedom. Bush was a bad president. A better military president could have secured Iraq much better and faster.

  • Exactly, the soldiers are supposed to protect their homeland, not sacrifice overseas to fulfil the interests of the few elite

  • @shotsky94 Saddam was an ex-CIA agent, who was nothing other than a tool, and by the tome he realised it it was too late. US has been intervening in Iran since 1953. That's what got us into this shit in the first place. And somehow the guys on top don't bother cleaning up their own shit, instead they throw us into deeper shit. Don't just blindly listed to all the propaganda you hear, because the main cause of these problems are the people who control US foreign policy (the interests behind them)

  • @williamjpiano Saddam was evil. Plain and simple. Iran with nukes is unacceptable. I'm living in the present not in the past. I voice my opinions with the hope of influencing or express my support or disagreement with current policy not to amend things done in the past...

  • @shotsky94 Saddam may be evil, but invading Iraq was a violation of International law, as well as the sovereignty of Iraq. Now to mention the fact that congress did not declare war too, so the invasion was unconstitutional and illegal. Not to mention that there was flimsy evidence that Saddam had WMDs, and it was sad that they had to fire a CIA officer just to prove their point. As for Iran having nukes, there is nothing unacceptable. It balances the power between Israel and the Arab states

  • @williamjpiano Obviously, Iraq could have been done much better. The Bush people screwed up regarding intel.... Iran having nukes is perfectly fine? HAHAHA.....You're so fucking naive. Iran is the number ONE state sponsor of international terrorism. They have extensive ties to Hezbollah and Hamas, particularly the former. Iran has killed more American soldiers in the arabian peninsula than any other country. Get your head out of the sand sir.

  • @shotsky94 Your point about Iran killing american soldiers is total BS, who sent them there to be killed in the first place? We don't even have a right to be in the Arabian peninsula. By blaming specific people for the problem we face, you are ignoring the fact that the cause of the problem was our offensive foreign policy. US has already started screwing Iran since 1953, you want to continue to screw it and land the world in deeper shit? Iran has the right to sponsor terrorists, just as the US

  • @williamjpiano I cant believe you'd say that about the troops. "Iran has the right to sponsor terrorists." But what if these terrorists get access to these nukes that you seem to think is perfectly fine for Iran to have. America has defense treaties with Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc, so yes we do have a right to be in the Middle East. Iran is the problem. They lied to the international community concerning their nuclear programme. Do you honestly think they can be trusted with nukes?

  • @shotsky94 Cmon man learn from the past. Cuban missile crisis was solved through diplomacy, not invasian. As long as America continues with this offensive foreign policy the wars will never end and the war profiteers will keep on profiting.

  • @truendymion Diplomacy has obviously failed with the iranians. Even a toddler would realize that. They refuse to back down on their nuclear programme. Contrary to your belief, Cuban Missile Crisis was solved not only by diplomacy, but by a strong show of force. Colin Powell owned Ron Paul on this issue once before.

    watch?v=nQus52COlSI. I favor a one-time strike on their nuclear facilities to show them we and the intl. community mean business...

  • Comment removed

  • Sanctions aren't diplomacy. Let Iran do whatever they want, its no threat to us. Their military is sub-par, and they don't even have much gasoline. They won't nuke Israel, because that would mean they would destroy Jerusalem, one of their holiest cities. It would piss of everyone against the Muslim world, and be a flat out terrible descicion. Its not America's buisness who has Nukes and who doesnt.

  • @2014akshay @2014akshay "Let Iran do whatever they want". Are you fucking serious. Talk about head-in-the-sand. When will Paultard be able to distinguish between fantasy and reality. Iran is the number one state sponsor of terrorism. We just cant let them do whatever they want. They are an existential threat to our allies. .

  • @2014akshay Contd....

    Contrary to your defeatist positions, America and the intl community have a responsibility to make sure nukes dont get into the wrong hands. What will you paulites say if iran's nukes go to a terrorist organization like hezbollah which they have extensive ties with..

  • @shotsky94 Terrorists from the middle east don't go after canada or mexico....

    Al Qaueda's goal is to get the US out of the middle east

  • @shotsky94 Its not America's responsibility to police the world. It has the power to do so, but not the money. We waste too much money overseas. When will you guys realize that our predator missles that kill civilians create terrorists? There are definately some people that would strap a bomb to themselves, and kill us for ideological differences. However, leaving killing a man's family can fuel the rage behind these terrorists.

  • @shotsky94 we should just come home. It would save money, lives, and stop the terrorist group from growing. A one time strike on their nuke facitilites? Thats an act of war. Ron Paul has more support from the milatary than all other canditates from the GOP. Its not out job to babysit our allies. Iran is a threat to no one, with or without a nuke (nukes aret even confirmed. Anyways, iranians lie their stupid asses off). They wont nuke israel, because it has jeruesalem, a holy muslim place

  • @2014akshay Get your head out of the sand. I said, what if Iran's nukes end up with one of the terrorist groups with which they have extensive ties with. We dont need ground troops to stop Iran's nuclear programme. Just one strike would do the trick. Yes, its an act of war. That's the whole point!!!. They lied for years concerning their programme, and now you suddenly think they can be trusted. C'mon, you paulites have to be realistic for once....

  • @shotsky94 What are you talking about. Get real. The idea of Iran posing an attack on us is absurd. Who are we to decide who gets nukes and who doesn't? You do know we're not the world police right? If they were going to attack anyone, it's most likely be Israel since they are closer and hate them more than us. Iran is not a threat, it's a nuisance. We can't afford it anyway. We've already bankrupted ourselves, and we should just come back home.

  • @Yabuturtle Iran has already signalled that it will attack Turkey's missile defense systems(which are actually ours) if anyone disturbs them on their nuclear ambitions. They just cant be trusted. And a nuclear iran would set up an arms race all over that region with little shitty countries like Jordan, and Bahrain nuking up. Furthermore, Iran is a sponsor of terrorism and what happens if their nukes fall into the wrong hands like Hezbollah, etc.

  • @shotsky94 Man you are such a tool lol! If the US would just stay out of the Arabian Peninsula then there wouldn't be any problems in the first place. Let them sort their own shit out and everything would be just fine.

  • @Yabuturtle contd....And yes we can easily afford it by scaling back our other efforts in the region. It would not cost much especially if the Israelis decide to join in. Prevention is better than cure. Better to fight the non-nuclear Iran today, than face the nuclear iran tomorrow....

  • @shotsky94 Diplomacy at end of a gun barrel will always fail. Cuban Missile Crisis there was a military quarantine and backroom talks between world leaders, there was no bombing! BTW India, Pakistan, North Korea, Soviet Union, China have nukes too. Should we go bomb them too? Why do you want endless war?

  • @truendymion The radical jihadists must not possess nukes for they shall eradicate Israel from world map...

  • @shotsky94 Fuck Israel for they eradicate Palestinians and anyone else they don't like just like they tried to kill the crew of the USS Liberty..their supposed allies.

  • @shotsky94 Cont. Just like the US has the right to disobey international law and attack countries as they wish based on lame excuses

  • Everyone please go to wwwDOTmeetupDotcom and join a Ron Paul meet-up group near you! Get active in Ron Paul's support. With your help he will win the Republican nomination and make his way straight to President!

  • NEW RON PAUL MONEY BOMB! 11-11-11!

    LETS GET TO 6 MILLION DOLLARS!

  • Let's have another Ron in the White House!

    ps: Looks just like Gandalf!

  • @Eye2EyeIIIV Gandalf for President!

  • @Wesmac4

    lol yeah!

  • I thought that libertarians supported open borders

  • @rockinandout You're confusing liberals with libertarians.

  • @kinyodas Neo-Conservatives always tend to do that. They think liberal and libertarian are the same. I am a conservative libertarian.

  • @rockinandout Not most of them...you have the Conservative Libertarians like me who don't then you got the Liberal Libertarians. Ron Paul is a conservative.

  • @yourtreat2 You are incorrect sir. You are talking about Corporatism, which Ron Paul is absolutely against. He supports free markets meaning government is not involved meaning no tax breaks for big corporations, no corporate/political entanglements, no military/industrial complex.

  • WHEEE!

    

  • @yourtreat2 Its the unfair regulations that got us into this mess! Regulations that favor specific corporations and hurt small business and entrepreneurs! Ron Paul is against corporatism, he advocates Free Markets meaning corporations have to play by the same rules as everyone else, no bailouts!

  • (copy)

    It's not enough to say "Vote Ron Paul"

    PEOPLE NEED TO SWITCH PARTIES 12 WEEKS IN ADVANCE OF THE PRIMARIES IN MOST STATES.

    IF YOU DO NOT SWITCH IN TIME YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF YOU ARE NOT REGISTERED REPUBLICAN YOU CANNOT VOTE IN PRIMARY.

    IF RON PAUL DOES NOT WIN PRIMARY, NO GENERAL ELECTION ! REGISTER AS A REPUBLICAN. FIND OUT WHEN YOUR STATE HAS PRIMARIES. FIND OUT WHERE AND VOTE VOTE VOTE ! PLEASE !

    WE NEED EVERY LAST VOTE ! Copy and paste this everywhere

  • Ron Paul ftw, most donations from active military than any other candidate even the President!

  • 34 people are weak on national defense.

  • For those 34 dislikes.... Suit up and go to help the nation builders, we dont need your mentality here.