@Brewhaman So remember all the positive things I said about Junior Hemingway? He proved himself to be a mini-Megatron this season in the way he went up for jump balls. Hell, he averaged more yards per catch (20.6) than Megatron did for the Lions (17.5). Here you were smearing Hemingway as "another player Poole1Dan falsely hyped up." Oh, did I mention one of the head coaches I wanted Michigan to hire just led us to a BCS Bowl win?
@Poole1Dan Not wasting my time on you any longer cock-gobbler. After how many years? 3? You still don't get it's not about the coach, it's not about the players, it's not even the fact you don't go to Michigan because you're too stupid, but have a dorky ass Walmart Wolverine Pull-over on in your senior picture. You're just a TERRIBLE fan, that's it...nothing more.
"Here you were smearing Hemingway" another baseless, BS accusation. What I said was he was "unproven". Grow the fuck up LISPER!
You also said the only reason I liked him was that he supposedly had a cool name, and that he shouldnt be on the field because "we have Darryl Stonum! Herp derp!" Hemingway was yet another player I was right about. You know who else I praised for the longest time? Fitz Toussaint. How'd that work out?
I know Michigan Wolverine football, and while I have been wrong more than once cause I'm imperfect, you can't hold a candle to me, Brewhafag
I never read any "praise" from you on Fitz you pimple faced homo, you get ZERO points there.
"Almost every dickrod recruit who has done well at Michigan did it under Hoke, not dickrod"...right, but only AFTER they've had time to develope into a college athlete, you're talking in circles again Lisper. Just take your shitty Michigan Fandom elsewhere, I'm not interested in any of your stupid, biased, non-factual backed opinions.
Nope, you're right and it has everything to do with you being a big, fat, hairy PUSSY! It must make you feel "powerful" talking shit behind the monitor, Mr. Internet Badass. You're the biggest keyboard warrior on youtube Lisper, congrats, LMFAO!!!
Typical, like I said, you'll get yours sooner than later pencil dick!
@Lisper1Dan"You are such a know-nothing loser"...what I do know is enough. You're a wanna be Wolverine. A "hide-behind a monitor", run off your dick-suckers, keyboard warrior. Nevermind all the WRONG predictions you made on RR's players, lets instead talk about the 1% you got right.What it comes down to is you looked like a total ass trolling Ohio State videos and making lofty predictions on Rich Rod in '08.When they didn't come true, you showed your true fandom...and it's UGLY (like you).
@Brewhaman You made this comment a day after saying you weren't wasting your time with me. CONTRADICTION. Anyway...
"Nevermind all the WRONG predictions you made on RR's players"
Almost every dickrod recruit who has done well at Michigan did it under Hoke, not dickrod. Hoke and his staff are better at developing players than dickrod could ever dream of being. Period. End of story. Look at how spectacularly his assistants failed at Pittsburgh under Todd Graham. Look at GERG
@Brewhaman "When they didn't come true, you showed your true fandom"
No, its just that I saw dickrod for the failure that he was three games into his career, long before anyone else did. There's an mgoblog thread on me from October 2008 fergodsakes! I wasn't being a shitty fan. I was simply ahead of the curve. I also said in more than one place that hiring Hoke would be a good idea. So far, so good.
@Poole1Dan "its just that I saw dickrod for the failure that he was three games into his career" BULLLLLLSHIT LISPER! You looked like a total ass trolling Ohio videos talking about the spread and what RR was going to bring to Michigan...don't give me that shit you stupid bastard child! You felt compelled to join the Anti-RR train, only AFTER those lofty expectations of yours didn't hold true. It was all about covering your ass Lisper. And Cam Cameron was your choice, Gruden too, NOT Hoke, GTFO!
@Brewhaman "You felt compelled to join the Anti-RR train, only AFTER those lofty expectations of yours didn't hold true"
We were an 11-2 or at least an 8-4 quality team, and we looked like a 3-9 team. I called dickrod out on it, and sure enough, we finished 3-9. Shit, I got blasted for saying we'd go 6-6 in 2009 when everyone predicted 8-4. We went 5-7. Yes, I had high expectations for dickrod, and when U-M failed spectacularly,I correctly pointed the gun at him and said "HE DID IT!"
@Poole1Dan Here's the quote from some douchenozzle who goes by Sonny:
"He also thinks that Cam Cameron and Brady Hoke would have been much, much better coaching choices than RR.
Try to figure that one out."
That comment was from March 24, 2009, almost two years before Hoke was hired. I called that shit, and while I was quite harsh on Hoke at times this year in my own private sphere, fact remains that he was better than dickrod like I said he'd be
@Poopee1Fan- I don't care about what you thought you said or might have said. You've been trying to justify your stance to me for over 3 years now. Frankly, you bore me. You talk tough when we both know you're a big pussy with a lisp. You're an unmedicated bi-polar who also just happens to be a Michigan fan. It's all non-sense to me. That's my"spot-on"opinion and there isn't anything you can do out here or in your "private sphere" to change that. So stop wasting my time with your silly excuses.
@PoopFanDan-"You also said the only reason I liked him was that he supposedly had a cool name, and that he shouldnt be on the field because we have Stonum"
NEVER once said Junior "didn't belong on the field" you over-inflated weasel dick! Classic Lisper...making shit up to justify his bullshit stance...WHATS NEW? He was injured 2 years and had Mono another, so at that time, he was unproven. You only liked him because of his cool name and he was a Carr recruit, be honest with yourself jackass.
now he's at michigan he can get his own players who can run his system. And soon later He'll have a team that will make the 2006-2008 WV look like rubbish.
If u dont like RR coaching at Michigan and think his spread-option is rubish then go look up WV serioulsy they took out BCS powers. And that was wit a team Michigan can get easily. Once Michigan starts winning i recomend you to find a new team cuz Michigan doesn't have to deal with your shit.
Jake Ryan Plays relentless. I'll be happy to see him at Michigan. I wouldn't be suprised to see him playing early. I could care less of the star rating this film speaks for itself. I'm amazed the sweatervest didn't go hard after this guy. Welcome to Michigan and Go Blue!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
we held them to 399 yards of offense when they had averaged 457 yards oper game on the season (did I mentioned we shut down God/Tebow?). I'll admit that we let Harvin burn us badly, but overall, our defense played well against the Gators potent offense.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nope. Henne had two inteceptions, one of which resulted in Percy harvins go ahead TD, and Hart had two fumbles at the goalline that negated two touchdowns. If Michigan lost that game, it would have beenc ause of turnovers, not bad defense. We shut down Tebow. We forced them into TWO failed 4-and-outs on their last two possessions of the game, when it mattered most. We stuffed them twice in the redzone and forced them to take FG's, one of which was blocked. we held them to 2-11 on 3rd down.
177 points total in 2008 against Big Ten competition, and a whopping.......177 points against Big ten competition in 2009. There was no improvement whatsoever against, you know, real teams. Dickrods shitty spread option offense has been a massive failure in the Big Ten and is just as big, if not a bigger, reason for the 8-16 record the last two seasons then the defense.
There is definatly an improvement. The players say its too bad some people cant see how good the program is going to be. Maybe you cant see it , but others can. I dont think people who know the game of football very well are the ones complaining. Very foolish .
where's the proof? They averaged 22 PPG in Big Ten play in 2008, and they averaged 22 in 2009. They gave up more yards per game defensively then they did in 2008. They were worse against Big Ten competition, going from 2-6 to 1-7. The only discernable matter in which Michigan showed improvement was against non-conference competition, where they went 4-0 in 2009 vs. 1-3 in 2008. The idea that Michigan is making progress is blind faith, not fact
Do I THINK Michigan will be a great football team under dickrod? No. Do I WANT them to be a great team under dickrod? Yes.
"I dont think people who know the game of football very well are the ones complaining"
then you haven't been to michigan dot rivals or espn, where the likes of John Borton, Chris Balas, and Adam Ritenberg believe Rodriguez should stay but have held his feet to the fire. and besides, whats your standard for a persons football IQ?
You're missing the point, which is that its fallacious to point to one game and say "thats how good they were all season!" I don't actually believe that the miserable offensive performance against illinois sums up our offensive performance in the 2009 season. I bought it up to show how proposterous and rediculous brewhacunts logic is.
And BTW, for what its worth, Forciers 2 fumbles lost nor the wreteched defense accounts for 13 points and 2.6 YPC against a terrible defense. Michigan scored
dickrod doesn't make the plays, but its his job to coach them and develope them and put them in a position where they can make plays. He has failed miserably at that job.
also, your examples of Harrsin and Cribbs mean nothing. Of the 10 college programs with the most NFL players right now, all of them had good or great head coaches: Butch Davis/Larry Coker Miami), Jim Tressell, Bobby Bowden, Mark Richt, Lloyd Carr, Philip Fulmer, Nick Saban/Les Miles (LSU), Mack Brown, Urban meyer, and
You should also stop calling him derogatory names. He most likely accomplished alot more and helped out others more than you ever had. Show some respect for others. He has a family .
I don't know the man personally, so I have nothing against him personally. I do, however, have a huge problem with what he's done on the field as Michigans head coach. I think he has failed in his job and deserves to be fired. whats wrong with that?
No he hasn't. The offense sucked in 2008 (109th nationally) and was bad in 2009 (60th nationally). Scoring wise, they were just as bad against Big Ten competition in 2008 as they were in 2009. Did a amn good job? Yeah, against fucking Deleware State!
How cute that you day everybody shotos down my arguments when its me who gets everyone that argues with me to say 'you're an idiot and are not a Michigan fan.' Strawmans argument at its finest!
wrong. the offense sucked in 2008 cause dickrod forced his shitty spread option down the teams throats even thougn it didn't fit them and cause he purt the wrong players on the field. He started McGuffie and Shaw at TB even though Minor and Brown were healthy enough to play and were making plays whenever they touched ball. He started Stonum at outside receive in the first 4 games when he had Hemingway healthy. He started fucknig Odoms in the slot when Odoms wasn;t doing shit. he started a
true freshman in Koger at TE when he had an experienced, proven playmaker at TE in Carson Butler. Then you've got the faact that greg Frey did a terrible job coaching the o-line (as is evident by the fact that he inherited just as much talent and experience as Andy Moeller did in 2001 but the 2001 o-line was so much better then the 2008 o-line). The inexperience from Threet was only a small part of the offenses woes. Poor COACHING is what fucked us over offensively.
Mathews, Minor, Brown, and most of the starters on defense the last two seasons were blue chip recruits. So now, they do not suck. Their dissapointing lack of All Big Ten production is not indicative of their talent, its indicative of dickrod misusing them. Also, whether or not you make it to the NFL is in large part based on how well you are coached in college, not just your pure raw talent, so if Brown and Minor and those guys don't get drafted, it does not mean they suck.
While I appreciate Threet giving us what he could in year one of the transition...what you have here is another Foole1Fantasy. We'll see what Threet can do when put in the "right" situation. But I also doubt he's a NFL QB.
Bottom line: Michigan didn't have an experience issue, a talent issue, or an injury issue in 2008 or 2009 on offense. They had a coaching issue. And that starts at the top with dickrod.
I love Brian Cooks line: "they're not excuses, they're reasons." Yeah, reasons to explain away why dickrod doesn't need to be fired!
players in Carlos Brown, Brandon Minor, Carson Butler, Junior Hemingway, Greg Mathews, and Kevin Grady. Of those 6 players, only Hemingway was seriously injured, and that still didn't stop dickrod from not utilizing Hemingway in the first 4 games of the season, when he was mostly healthy. So dickrod has no injury excuse with those 6 skill guys. The o-line had 3 relartively experienced players as well (Schilling, orttman, McAvoy), although I'll grant you that Orttman isn't that talented.
Nope. He can't. Not when the majority of his starters on both sides of the ball are juniors or seniors, and when he returns 7/11 starters on offense and 8/11 on defense. Forcier is a returning starter (God that sounds so good to say!). He's no longer inexperienced.
As far as 08 and 09 are concerend, you can't btich about 09 cause he had 10/11 starters returning. And with 08, sure he only had 3/11 starters returning, but he still inherited 6 experience or quasi-experienced skill position
to play here anymore. If you can't see this, you're a delusional moron. But then again, I am talking to a guy who thought Nick Sheridan was our starter last season and thought Carrs recruiting classes actually sucked. You should at least take the mgoblog route and bitch about attrition while acknolwedging that carrs classes were indeed really good.
at least 10 of them signing letters of intent to Michigan. Half of all of Carrs classes were composed of blue chip recruits, whereas under dickrod, the number is lucky to be 25%. Like I said: this is what you get with the culture of losing dickrod has implemented. He hauled in a really good class in 2009 cause he could dismiss the 08 season as an anamoly and could still let the program sell its great name, but now that Michigan has estbalished a trend of losing, the top recruits don't want
Learn to read. I said that those 5 players were the only ones CONSIDERING us. That doesn't mean they will actually COMMIT to us. Demetrius Hart is the only blue chip recruit who's even close to being a commitment right now. Depreist, McReynolds, Arnett, and Hayes have us on their list of schools they are considering, but they are far from actually commiting much less signing a letter of intent. In the Carr years, Michigan would have around two dozen blue chip recruits considering Michigan and
The proof is in the film, he looks like a hard working athlete that can lay the lumber! I think too many people look at the star system to guage how our class is going. If we have some hard working kids coming to Ann Arbor, like Ryan and you mention Vinopal, that want to push these "stars" to get it done, so be it! I agree, this Ryan kid looks solid on this film, give him some time to develope and I think he'll blossom. I'm glad Ryan is coming to Ann Arbor, lord knows we need help!
a lot of the losing isn't RR's fault Dan.some of it is.let's just wait til next year to see what'll happen.i thinkwe'll know then if its gonna work or not with RR. i think we're all very frustrated with whats gone on.i believe his system can work. alot of the problems have todeal with the fact that he does things A LOT different andisn't the prototypical "Michigan Man".and also he's fighting against some of the players from Carr's regime and even from his.he's pushing them harder than Carr did
Not only is he ignorant, the kid tries to come off as some kind of internet bad ass...did you see his profile?? That clown would have trouble fighting his way out of a girl scout convention...give me a friggin break!
I just don't get why certain people bitch and moan about RR. His offense (which is what he is, an offensive coach) has NOTHING to do with Michigan's troubles...it's the D!!!! You put up 30+ points on offense and still lose? DEFENSE!!!! B10 plays defense, the Big East..not so!If not mistaken,they had 1 ranked defense(Rutgers)in the top 25 D's in the nation.I think RR has finally figured this out after 2 years,hence all the D players being recruited.Good to see he's made it a priority!
You prove yet again that you are a stupid cunt with no knowledge of football (probably cause you never played the game, or cause you are willfully ignorant, or both). dickrods offense was terrible in 2008 and bad in 2009 (especially against Big Ten competition), and yet you're saying the offense has nothing to do with our woes? What a joke!
No, what I have proven time and time again is that you are a shitty fan, with a boat load of personal notes stolen from Rivals/Scouts, that you attempt to use in order to form an illusuion that you some sort of fucking guru.The fact is, you're a sad, lonely dork, the type of fucking nerd I hip checked into hallway lockers on a regular basis.But whatever, continue on with your Donald Duck Lisp *quack-quack*, you're posts are like annoying infomercials at best. Zero content and highly opinionated.
i actually agree with him though Dan i think the offense was solid last season considering freshman mistakes loosing minor and brown and our best lineman (molk) oue defense costs us most them games last year specially the iowa game! I think were a few playmakers and some gerth on defense away from bein a good team,this year will be a huge step in the right direction
The offense was the #1 scoring offense in the B10, this is why I said, RR's offense IS NOT THE PROBLEM! Foole1Fan doesn't get it, he's got his own agenda.
It's all about the defense the past 3 years, even under Carr/English. But, given the fact that there has been 3 different coordinators in 3 years, you can see, partially, why we've struggled. This fucking embicole only sees it ONE WAY...his way!
He talks about "agreeing to disagree", but he doesn't live by that!
yeah i agree man and the 1st year under RR the defense had whole roster he inherriated had no depth especially the defense and yeah when u change d-cords as often its all new schemes and more stuff to learn! i think greg robinson is one of the best d-cords there is it will start taking shape this year even though we gotta expect some growing pains still due to lack of upper classmen,But i agree man totally
You got that right, different coordinators come with different schemes, where is our identitiy? Things will get better if we just continue to recruit and coach these kids up. Having the same coordinator around helps too. And I agree, GRobinsons resume speaks for itself, we got a good coach, just don't have the right puzzle pieces yet, but they're coming!
No, it was not the NO.1 scoring offense in the Big Ten. Wisconsin led the Big Ten in scoring offense at 31.8 PPG. Look it up.
The last two defenses under Carr and English were ranked 15th and 24th respecitvely in the national rankings. The 2006 defense had the best statistical rush defense of the decade. The 2007 defense gave up only 178 yards passing per game and was ranked 8th nationally. The last two defenses under Carr and English were the shit.
"The last two defenses under Carr and English were the shit"
LOL!!! Ok Donald, here we go again *quack-quack*, I guess this is why that stellar defense was stung by App. State and TORCHED a week later by Oregon in '07...."the shit", LOL!!!!!
Seriously...only a fucktard like yourself would waste her life with this shit, do us real Michigan fans a favor, stop copying stats, get out and get laid, or, better yet, go step out in front of a bus.
App State and Oregon proved to be anamolies. The 2007 defense crushed Illinois and their Rose bowl-worthy offense, and we held God, err, Tim Tebow, to a 50% completion percentage, 160 yards passing, and 3.6 YPC. We also thwarted the powerful offenses of Penn State (9 points), Northwestern (16 points), and Purdue (21 points). Yeah, we had a really good defense in 2007, especially in the secondary.
Quite the opposite slappy, I know you lack comprehesion skills but I shut that lame shit down when I stated the '07 defense got beat by a 1AA team....once again, you looked like a total horses ass! It must be an awful feeling knowing I'm always here to make you look stupid, but it's just too damm easy. Just hang it up Donald, *quack-quack*, you can't win..I OWN YOU.
It's people like you that birth control and the abortion was invented!
LOL. What are you, Miss South Carolina? Wanna tell me where the Iraq is? Perhaps you need a map to find it!
Anyways though, my response to your App State argument what that that loss was an anamoly. The Michigan defense was good to great from the 3rd game of the season on out. Hence why they finished 24th in the nation in total defense, 23rd in scoring defense, and 8th in pass defense, despite facing a duplicity of really good offenses. (=
Furthermore, if you are going to use the argument of letting one game (App State) sum up the seasons defensive performance, then I will do the same with Michigans offense in 2009. And I choose Michigans 13 point, 3 turnover, 2.6 YPC showing against the WRETCHED defense of Illinois as the microcosm of their season. Which means, by the logic of one old brewhaman, dickrods spread option offense SUCKS. *ba dum ch*
Ok , then explain how that '07 defense lost 4 in a row.
They not only lost to App. State & Oregon in '07, back it up even more, they gave up 42 to tUOS and then 30 something to U$C prior to the '07 season!
Your problem, besides being a flaming dork, is u only look at certain aspects of the entire picture to base you lame ass arguments. The fact is, Michigans Woes have nothing...NOTHING to do with RR's offense. D alone is the issue, again, look past your prejudices shit stain!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Funny. You accuse me of not looking at the big picture and yet you point to one short stretch, or one game, where the defense was bad and then claim thats how it was over the course of a season. You two faced hypocrite! I'll give you the big picture (again): michigans defense in 2006 and 2007 under Ron English only gave up 268.3 yards and 335.7 yards per game respectively (good for 15th nationally and 24th nationally out of 119 teams). Scoring wise, English's defenses only gave up 15.9 and
Just look at this page....what a friggin LOSER!!! Cloggin up a fine recruits page with all your bullshit, I'm not even going to read it. It looks like someone (ie YOU) came to this video and smeared shit all over it, nice way to rape someones highlight film...get a life clown!
@Brewhaman well well well, the 2008 defense ended up having 4 of its 11 starters get drafted (Terrance Taylor, Morgan Trent, Brandon Graham, Stevie Brown). 4 other starters got NFL free agent contracts (Tim Jamison, Will Johnson, Brandon Harrison, Donovan Warren). Meanwhile, Obi Ezeh and Jonas Moutan still have their senior years to go. Turns out John Thompson was the only starter on the 08 defense that lacked talent.
@Brewhaman like I said all along: terrible coaching is what fucked over the 2008 defense, NOT a lack of talent. 8 of the 11 starters on the 08 defense were blue chip recruits, so it makes sense that 8 of them either got drafted or inked free agent deals. The 2008 defense-just like the offense-HAD THE TALENT to help us win a Big Ten championship, beat Ohio State, and win at least 8 games. But we were FUCKED OVER by BAD COACHING from dickrod and his cronnies on both sides of the ball.
@Brewhaman One last thing: I'll bet it REALLY bothers you that so many starters on the 2008 defense made it to the NFL. Afterall, that just DESTROYS your enrtire argument that bad coaching wasn't the cause of our problems in 2008. History has shown that I was RIGHT. East shit you fat bitch!
@Brewhaman In your raging hatred for a 20 year old dude on youtube, you forgot one of the golden rules of college football: spring game performances must be taken with a grain of salt. Case in point: Keith Nichol and Kirk Cousins look like Tom Brady and Peyton Manning in spartys spring game, but then Cousins goes out there and plays like shit while Nichol is so bad he gets moved to wide receiver. Lets see what Threet does in, you know, REAL GAMES
"you forgot one of the golden rules of college football: spring game performances must be taken with a grain of salt"
Then why were you over at Michigan's spring game highlight offering you stupid, shitty opinions (again)? Running off your dicksuckers about who looks like "shit", whos not cutting it and who you'd love to perform a rusty trombone on.
@Brewhaman "Then why were you over at Michigan's spring game highlight offering you stupid, shitty opinions"
Because I, like every other fan of every other team, have observations and opinions of their teams spring game. I can take what I see in the spring game with a grain of salt and still have observations and opinions about what happened, which is exactly what I and thousands of other fans have done.
@Brewhaman You, on the other hand, take Threets shitty spring game performance and say that somehow I was wrong about Threet. I've never done that with any player. For example, when I said Brandon Moore deserved to have the ball thrown his way more, I did NOT follow that up by saying he would be the starting TE and would have an all big ten season. You can rightfully say that Threet played shitty in the spring game, but to say i was wrong about him absed on his performance in that game is bogus.
@Poopee1Fan Whatever...you're once again...grasping at straws, you're an idiot. In this case you don't see that what you're saying about me, you're already doing/done....that's" hypocrisy". You also don't see that your oservations/opinions don't mean shit to anyone but yourself. The bottom line is you can't judge talent, you have too much shit between your ears.
@Brewhaman How am I grasping at straws? where's your evidence to support that blanket statement? Tell me where I was wrong in the explanation I gave you yesterday about my opinions and observations of Michigans spring game. Also, being a hypocrite has NOTHING to do with "doing/done." A hypocrite is a person who says you shou;dn't do something and then does that exact same thing. Look it up you uneducated redneck hillbilly clown
@Poole1StupidFuckDan: "A hypocrite is a person who says you shou;dn't do something and then does that exact same thing"
Exactly stupid fuck, you tell me to take spring practice with "a grain of salt", THEN, you're over giving your dumb opinions on Michigans Spring game...see the correlation? It's right there...open your fucking eyelids LOSER! As I mentioned in the past, not only are you Schitzo, unmedicated and Delusional...you're a walking fucking contradiction!
@Brewhaman "THEN, you're over giving your dumb opinions on Michigans Spring game"
How is that being hypocritical? Unlike you, I never said that any one player is going to suck or is going to dominate based on what happened in the spring game. if you said that Threet was bad in the spring game and doesn't deserve to start, then I would not have argued with you. But you said that I was somehow wrong about my predictions for Threet on game day during the season, which is what I grilled you for.
I'm not even going to waste my fucking time with you on these 2 subjects. It's obvious your are everything you try to pin a me, a hipocrite probably being the biggest. I could travel youtube to visit each one of your comments and point out how 95% of what you post is contradicting, but it would be nothing more than a waste of time, you're just an umedicated schitzo.
"Thats cause you CAN'T PROVE IT" (Contradiction after contradiction, bombed predictions, hipocrisy, delusion and several other unmedicated dribble)
It's all over out here Puddles, jump to each recruiting video and it's right there, for the entire UM fanbase to whitness... Foole1Fan barking from the anal walls of insanity.
"1. where are my contradictions?" Saying Roundtree will never be a playmaker, then coming back saying you weren't taking your medication when speculating and was wrong.
"2. where's my hypocrisy" Shamelessly calling me a hipocrite for stating the obvious with Threet and Trent, when all you do is BASH players
@Brewhaman "Saying Roundtree will never be a playmaker, then coming back saying you weren't taking your medication when speculating and was wrong."
shit, i should give you credit for making an effort! But alas, I debunked this already on Roundtrees video, and I'll do it again: thats not contradicting myself either. contradicting myself would be me saying Forciers great on one video and on the same day (or the same week, or possibly the same month if its the offseason) say Forcier sucks on
@Brewhaman another video. But a contradiction of my assessment is beyond my control and therefore cannot be blamed on me. Everything I said about Roundree i said before he became productive. therefore, i have not contradicted myself
"Shamelessly calling me a hipocrite for stating the obvious with Threet and Trent, when all you do is BASH players"
there's absolutely no hypocrisy there. I have NEVER said you shouldn't bash players, so i can bash players all i want and not be a hypocrite.
"3. what do faulty predctions have to do with the contradictions ahd hypocrisy you claim i have?" You bash, then when your statment doesn't hold the any truth, you come back and withdrawl your dumb comment...contradiction.
"4. if its all over out there, then can't you just give me one example? hmm?" Re-read 1-3.
@Brewhaman "You bash, then when your statment doesn't hold the any truth, you come back and withdrawl your dumb comment...contradiction"
as i just got done explaining, a contradiction of my assessment is NOT a contradiction of myself (which is what you've been talking about). Everything I said about Roundree i said before he became productive. therefore, i have not contradicted myself.
" but I have debunked them, as everybody can now see on this video"
Look at the top rated comments on this channel...NO ONE agrees w/you piss-ant!
I can't help you're too fucking stupid to see my examples in clarity
You haven't "debunked" anything, on the contrary, you've done nothing but made yourself look pathetic by all the switching of subjects and grasping at straws that have become the norm with you.
You're still a fucking idiot...."Go blue"?...LOL!! Ok dumbass...
@Brewhaman "Look at the top rated comments on this channel."
thats irrelevant. fact remains that anubody on youtube can read the comments and see what we've said to eachother and see the charges you've bought against me and see how I responded to each of them. whether they ultimitely agree with me or you is their own decision, and quite frankly is a decision that doesn't mean much to me
the rest of what you said was, as per usualy, ad hominem attacks.
the hypocrisy of brewhaman shows again: you chide me for when my comments are marked as spam, and what do you do? MARK YOUR OWN FUCKING COMMENTS AS SPAM!!! I haven't done that to myself once. My commnets only get marked as spam by people who disagree with me. this is nothing compared to a coward who marks many of his own comments as SPAM the day that he posts them!
@Brewhaman "it deflates your entire youtube existence"
this coming from a dude who has half the channell views I do despite being on youtube a year and a half longer, has made no videos vs. me maknig over a dozen, and has 43 youtube friends vs. my 239? If my youtube existense has been deflated, then what the hell does that make yours in comparison?
"from a dude who has half the channell views I do despite being on youtube a year and a half longer" I can't blame folks for looking at your channel after reading the nonsense you snail-trail youtube with.
"has made no videos vs. me maknig over a dozen" As much as you think people enjoy YOUR videos...Get a life, you bumb!
"has 43 youtube friends vs. my 239" I pick and choose who I'm friends with, carefully, might I add, after accepting and abolishing our friendship.
@Brewhaman "I can't blame folks for looking at your channel after reading the nonsense"
even so, how the fuck would my youtube existence be deflated if people are going to my channell and and getting an idea of who i am? the fact that I have twoce the channel viewd you do shoots down your argument that my youtube existense has been inflated, as you doing that is the pot calling the kettle black. PATHETIC!!!
@Brewhaman They can love or hate my videos. bottom line is I get a couple thousand views on them, which makes me happy and which debunks your idea that i don't have a youtube existence anymore.
"I pick and choose who I'm friends with"
thats fine, but don't be chiding me for supposedly not having a youtube existense in face of such a fact. you saying i have no youtube existence despite these facts shows you are grasping at straws and a pathetic attempt to personally attack me.
Like I said, if I accepted every invite that was offered, I'd have 239 looking as shamefull as each one of your posts. If you accept anyones invitation, like I did when accepting, then rejecting your friendship, you get a lot of dumfucks (like you) that don't know what the fuck they're talking about. But go ahead, pride yourself on 239 friends you fucking Moron, I'm laughing at your stupidity!
@Brewhaman y"ou get a lot of dumfucks (like you) that don't know what the fuck they're talking about."
you are once again missing the point, which is that you cannot chide me for not having a youtube existence anymore when I've got 239 friends compared to your 43. I id didn't have a youtube existence, then I would have, you know, 0 youtube friends, dumbfucks or Einsteins. so shut the fuck up about me not having a youtube existence when the facts show its false.
When you pride yourself on being into politics (which is why you continuee to refute the truth as I I present it to you) and being a "EXPERT" (your words, not mine junior) on Michigan football, I CAN "chide" you. You've open yourself up to so much shit out here, it's hailarious you're still even here. I could go on, but it's pointless.
then chide me for things that are factual, such as the fact that I hate dickrod and think Martavious Odoms is a shitty receiver, cause me not having a youtube existence is not factual and just shows you are making shit up at me and grasping at straws.
Do you come up with anything on your own? All you do is regurgitate BLOG terminology and pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself. Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry.
"you are making shit up at me" hardly the case creampuff. You just can't accept me sinking every bullshit comment you put out here.
@Brewhaman "Do you come up with anything on your own? "
in terms of my vocabulary? No. Why would I need to? theres a billion people who know millions of words of english. there ain't nothing to come up with that someone hasn't already said before. BTW, you have once again proven that you CANNOT refute the substance of what I say, so you call me out for my fucking vocabulary! Pitiful, just pitiful!
@Poopee1Fan " in terms of my vocabulary? No. Why would I need to?"
Because this is what "educated" folks do, they come up with thier own ideals, not stolen from the person they're losing an argument to or stolen from the idealogy of a fucking BLOG!
@Brewhaman "Because this is what "educated" folks do"
False. Like I said yesterday (and which you utterly failed to refute): theres a billion people who know millions of words of english. there ain't nothing to come up with that someone hasn't already said before
"they come up with thier own ideals"
vocabulary is neither an ideal or a patented idea. It is something that everyone has and that anyone of a given language can use. I am NOT borrowing your vocab, as it wasn't yours to begin with
@Brewhaman and I say again: you have proven that you CANNOT refute the substance of what I say, so you call me out for my fucking vocabulary! Pitiful, just pitiful!
@Brewhaman "pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself"
bullshit. you do not have a patent on the term 'grasping at straws.' Nobody does. they aren;t YOUR terminology. they are everyones terminology. anyone who can speak english can say it.
"Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry."
Not on Michigan football it hasn't, which, you know, is what we were talking about, not fucking vocabulary.
@Brewhaman "pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself"
bullshit. you do not have a patent on the term 'grasping at straws.' Nobody does. they aren;t YOUR terminology. they are everyones terminology. anyone who can speak english can say it.
"Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry."
Not on Michigan football it hasn't, which, you know, is what we were talking about, not fucking vocabulary.
wrong. you said I have no youtube existense, which I have proven to be a falsehood. therefore, you were making shit up about me when you said I have no youtube existence. no go back to your whore house
"the rest of what you said was, as per usualy, ad hominem attacks"
And THIS, as per usually, is YOUR cop out. There are no such "ad hominem" attacks, my comments are fully backed by logic and facts. Throwing up some fancy Latin term (that again, is being used incorrectly)does nothing for your credibility, you're a moron that knows nothing about the game of football. Your pathetic attempt to look smart is just hilarious....complete FAILURE!
@Brewhaman first of all, you marked this post as spam after bashing me for having my posts marked a sspam. say one thing to another: a brewhaman story
"my comments are fully backed by logic and facts"
bullshit, I bring issues of substance to the table, and you're response is invariably reduced to 'you're still an idiot, you're a shitty fan, shut the fuck up, your posts are too long' and all sorts of other fallacious arguments that automatically make me the winner of the debate.
@Brewhaman "you're a moron that knows nothing about the game of football."
see, thats what i mean. you make blanket ad hominem statements as the basis of your arguments against me. there's no facts or logic behind this, just personal venom. i don't respond to these arguments cause they automatically make me the winner. you can't address the substance of what I say, so you resort to shit like that.
But hell, keep it up. makes me know I'm kicking your ass in the arena of substance (:
@Brewhaman "But then you follow it up with 5 posts"
i followed it up with one post. the rest of my posts were on issues of substance. dude, get hooked on phonix and develope some damn reading skills that way you can deferentiate between substance and ad hominem!
thanks for fitting my description of you to a tee! i just got done saying in another video that you launch ad hominem attacks against me, and one example I gave of you was 'your posts are too lnog! learn to summarize!' I swear, me arguing with you is like playing with playdough!
@Poopee1Fan: " ad hominem attacks" again with the fancy Latin terms that you gained knowlege from, on a fucking BLOG (but still uses the term incorrectly).
"'your posts are too lnog! learn to summarize"
Yes, learn something about both, you're on youtube, not giving a thesis on what happens to the human mind when unmedicated(i.e. your stupid opinions).
"me arguing with you is like playing with playdough" And me conversing with you is like arguing with a child about taking her meds!
false. You have repeatedly addressed the substance of what I say by calling me names and attacking me as a person instead of addressing the substance of what I say, which is exactly what an ad hominem attack is (a fallacious argument against the person)
@Poope1Fan: " instead of addressing the substance of what I say"
97% of what you say is bullshit, sorry I'm picking apart your pathetic stance, deal with it. I find the holes in everything you post, sorry I won't discuss the bullshit portions.
"then chide me for things that are factual"
I HAVE! I've whooped that adolescent ass up and down this board!
"grasping at straws"? Can't come up w/your own terminology? Your vocabulary is very limited...
this is yet another stat that you have pulled out of your ass and that has no basis whatsoever. go back and read the thousands of posts I made and prove that 97% of what I've said is bullshit, then we can talk.
"sorry I'm picking apart your pathetic stance"
no need to apologize. you ain't picking apart nothing. I've debunked every single bullet of substance you've thrown at me and reduced you to luanching fllacious ad hominem attacks. Me wins!
not in this case you didn't. you chided me for having no youtube existence, which I exposed as an outright falsehood. so like I said: chide me for things that are factual, such as my attacks on odoms and dickrod and others
"Can't come up w/your own terminology?"
can't you address the substance of what I say? No/ didn't think so.
@Poopee1Fan-" you chided me for having no youtube existence"
-Your creditability of knowing football/talent and coaching is in the shitter Lisper. --You don't know what the fuck you're talking about from one post to the next. Furthermore, you're too stuck in the way things used to be, and the way things "should be". You think like an idealist. your existence on here is just a big pile of SPAM!
@Brewhaman "Your creditability of knowing football/talent and coaching is in the shitter"
1. I've already proven this to be a falsehood time and again by citing examples of predictions that I got right
2. even so, my knowledge of Michigan football has nothing to do with my my supposed lack of youtube existence. you have switcehd the topic from my youtube existence to my knowledge of football cause I have completely debunked your myth that i have no youtube existence. winner: Poole1Dan!
@Brewhaman "Furthermore, you're too stuck in the way things used to be, and the way things "should be". You think like an idealist"
1. again, this has nothing to do with my youtube existence. thanks for switching the topic and showing I destroyed your ass on the idea that I ahve no youtube existence
2. No, I'm not an idealist. an idealist thinks in unrealistic terms. I think in terms of facts and logic and history. I'm a realist, not an idealist.
@Brewhaman "your existence on here is just a big pile of SPAM!"
which does not mean I have no youtube existence, which was your original claim. just admit it: you were WRONG when you said I have no youtube existence
@Poopee1Fan " just admit it: you were WRONG when you said I have no youtube existence"
You might have an existence in the literal term of the word, but any creditability you think you have is GONE Lisper. You might as well pack up your shit and move on to somewhere else (may I suggest a Buckeye Blog w/all your UM blasphemy), because anything you post out here now is pure garbage.
@Brewhaman "You might have an existence in the literal term of the word"
thank you! at least I squeezed that of you your plumb ass!
"any creditability you think you have is GONE"
once again you switch the subject after I completely DEBUNK your claim on the original topic. Loser.
As far as my credibility is concerned, I'm going to invoke part of my youtube moto: I'm loved by some, hated by others. That's what happens when you are obsessed with the Michigan Wolverines
@Brewhaman "you're on youtube, not giving a thesis"
doesn't matter. on both youtube and in a thesis or a research paper, I often have alot that i need to say. So how about addressing what i actually say instead of attacking me for being too long and losing the debate to me automatically?
@Brewhaman "I'm not debating you, that's not what this is about. "
a person who is getting his ass kicked in the debate would say something hilarious like that! But hey, at least you've maned up and faced the truth, which is that I am debating you and have kicked your ass all over youtube in terms of substance while you resort to attacking me personally and make a futile attempt to 'make me a better fan' (IE, a fan that brewhaman approves of)
URBAN MEYER hated by hitler....please watch it.
1972mgoblue 2 months ago
I Seen On Espn.com He's Showing Out! Giving Our Defense A "Spark" I Like It! Him Kenny Demens Will Be Something To Look For
MrHollywoodJames 10 months ago
HE IS GOING TO BE A MONSTER FOR MICHIGAN THIS YEAR
babyjames221 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Josh Williams Highlight Film is wat yal need to watch the kid is sick at outside linebacker check it out and comment
younggwood91 1 year ago
Comment removed
cainepittman2 1 year ago
Comment removed
cainepittman2 1 year ago
Again, I don't have time to read the pile of SPAM you left here for me to read, get a life and take your fucking meds Kid.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman So remember all the positive things I said about Junior Hemingway? He proved himself to be a mini-Megatron this season in the way he went up for jump balls. Hell, he averaged more yards per catch (20.6) than Megatron did for the Lions (17.5). Here you were smearing Hemingway as "another player Poole1Dan falsely hyped up." Oh, did I mention one of the head coaches I wanted Michigan to hire just led us to a BCS Bowl win?
You are such a know-nothing loser!
GO BLUE!
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
@Poole1Dan Not wasting my time on you any longer cock-gobbler. After how many years? 3? You still don't get it's not about the coach, it's not about the players, it's not even the fact you don't go to Michigan because you're too stupid, but have a dorky ass Walmart Wolverine Pull-over on in your senior picture. You're just a TERRIBLE fan, that's it...nothing more.
"Here you were smearing Hemingway" another baseless, BS accusation. What I said was he was "unproven". Grow the fuck up LISPER!
Brewhaman 2 months ago
@Brewhaman "What I said was he was unproven"
You also said the only reason I liked him was that he supposedly had a cool name, and that he shouldnt be on the field because "we have Darryl Stonum! Herp derp!" Hemingway was yet another player I was right about. You know who else I praised for the longest time? Fitz Toussaint. How'd that work out?
I know Michigan Wolverine football, and while I have been wrong more than once cause I'm imperfect, you can't hold a candle to me, Brewhafag
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Homo1Dan "Herp derp"...more Mgoblog regurgatation. Anyway...
I never read any "praise" from you on Fitz you pimple faced homo, you get ZERO points there.
"Almost every dickrod recruit who has done well at Michigan did it under Hoke, not dickrod"...right, but only AFTER they've had time to develope into a college athlete, you're talking in circles again Lisper. Just take your shitty Michigan Fandom elsewhere, I'm not interested in any of your stupid, biased, non-factual backed opinions.
Brewhaman 2 months ago
@Pimplefaced1Dan "you can't hold a candle to me, Brewhafag"
Nope, you're right and it has everything to do with you being a big, fat, hairy PUSSY! It must make you feel "powerful" talking shit behind the monitor, Mr. Internet Badass. You're the biggest keyboard warrior on youtube Lisper, congrats, LMFAO!!!
Typical, like I said, you'll get yours sooner than later pencil dick!
Brewhaman 2 months ago
@Lisper1Dan"You are such a know-nothing loser"...what I do know is enough. You're a wanna be Wolverine. A "hide-behind a monitor", run off your dick-suckers, keyboard warrior. Nevermind all the WRONG predictions you made on RR's players, lets instead talk about the 1% you got right.What it comes down to is you looked like a total ass trolling Ohio State videos and making lofty predictions on Rich Rod in '08.When they didn't come true, you showed your true fandom...and it's UGLY (like you).
Brewhaman 2 months ago
@Brewhaman You made this comment a day after saying you weren't wasting your time with me. CONTRADICTION. Anyway...
"Nevermind all the WRONG predictions you made on RR's players"
Almost every dickrod recruit who has done well at Michigan did it under Hoke, not dickrod. Hoke and his staff are better at developing players than dickrod could ever dream of being. Period. End of story. Look at how spectacularly his assistants failed at Pittsburgh under Todd Graham. Look at GERG
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
@Brewhaman "When they didn't come true, you showed your true fandom"
No, its just that I saw dickrod for the failure that he was three games into his career, long before anyone else did. There's an mgoblog thread on me from October 2008 fergodsakes! I wasn't being a shitty fan. I was simply ahead of the curve. I also said in more than one place that hiring Hoke would be a good idea. So far, so good.
GO BLUE!
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
@Poole1Dan "its just that I saw dickrod for the failure that he was three games into his career" BULLLLLLSHIT LISPER! You looked like a total ass trolling Ohio videos talking about the spread and what RR was going to bring to Michigan...don't give me that shit you stupid bastard child! You felt compelled to join the Anti-RR train, only AFTER those lofty expectations of yours didn't hold true. It was all about covering your ass Lisper. And Cam Cameron was your choice, Gruden too, NOT Hoke, GTFO!
Brewhaman 2 months ago
@Brewhaman "You felt compelled to join the Anti-RR train, only AFTER those lofty expectations of yours didn't hold true"
We were an 11-2 or at least an 8-4 quality team, and we looked like a 3-9 team. I called dickrod out on it, and sure enough, we finished 3-9. Shit, I got blasted for saying we'd go 6-6 in 2009 when everyone predicted 8-4. We went 5-7. Yes, I had high expectations for dickrod, and when U-M failed spectacularly,I correctly pointed the gun at him and said "HE DID IT!"
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
@Poole1Dan Here's the quote from some douchenozzle who goes by Sonny:
"He also thinks that Cam Cameron and Brady Hoke would have been much, much better coaching choices than RR.
Try to figure that one out."
That comment was from March 24, 2009, almost two years before Hoke was hired. I called that shit, and while I was quite harsh on Hoke at times this year in my own private sphere, fact remains that he was better than dickrod like I said he'd be
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
@Poopee1Fan- I don't care about what you thought you said or might have said. You've been trying to justify your stance to me for over 3 years now. Frankly, you bore me. You talk tough when we both know you're a big pussy with a lisp. You're an unmedicated bi-polar who also just happens to be a Michigan fan. It's all non-sense to me. That's my"spot-on"opinion and there isn't anything you can do out here or in your "private sphere" to change that. So stop wasting my time with your silly excuses.
Brewhaman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PoopFanDan-"You also said the only reason I liked him was that he supposedly had a cool name, and that he shouldnt be on the field because we have Stonum"
NEVER once said Junior "didn't belong on the field" you over-inflated weasel dick! Classic Lisper...making shit up to justify his bullshit stance...WHATS NEW? He was injured 2 years and had Mono another, so at that time, he was unproven. You only liked him because of his cool name and he was a Carr recruit, be honest with yourself jackass.
Brewhaman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "And Cam Cameron was your choice, Gruden too, NOT Hoke, GTFO!"
Try again faggot:
mgoblog.com / content / kinda-ot-poole1dan-again#comment-86042
Poole1Dan 2 months ago
now he's at michigan he can get his own players who can run his system. And soon later He'll have a team that will make the 2006-2008 WV look like rubbish.
Buznanaz 2 years ago
If u dont like RR coaching at Michigan and think his spread-option is rubish then go look up WV serioulsy they took out BCS powers. And that was wit a team Michigan can get easily. Once Michigan starts winning i recomend you to find a new team cuz Michigan doesn't have to deal with your shit.
Buznanaz 2 years ago
lol i like the ref's shorts
rockediny 2 years ago
Jake Ryan Plays relentless. I'll be happy to see him at Michigan. I wouldn't be suprised to see him playing early. I could care less of the star rating this film speaks for itself. I'm amazed the sweatervest didn't go hard after this guy. Welcome to Michigan and Go Blue!
westonsz 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
we held them to 399 yards of offense when they had averaged 457 yards oper game on the season (did I mentioned we shut down God/Tebow?). I'll admit that we let Harvin burn us badly, but overall, our defense played well against the Gators potent offense.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nope. Henne had two inteceptions, one of which resulted in Percy harvins go ahead TD, and Hart had two fumbles at the goalline that negated two touchdowns. If Michigan lost that game, it would have beenc ause of turnovers, not bad defense. We shut down Tebow. We forced them into TWO failed 4-and-outs on their last two possessions of the game, when it mattered most. We stuffed them twice in the redzone and forced them to take FG's, one of which was blocked. we held them to 2-11 on 3rd down.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
177 points total in 2008 against Big Ten competition, and a whopping.......177 points against Big ten competition in 2009. There was no improvement whatsoever against, you know, real teams. Dickrods shitty spread option offense has been a massive failure in the Big Ten and is just as big, if not a bigger, reason for the 8-16 record the last two seasons then the defense.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
There is definatly an improvement. The players say its too bad some people cant see how good the program is going to be. Maybe you cant see it , but others can. I dont think people who know the game of football very well are the ones complaining. Very foolish .
michfoot20 2 years ago
"There is definatly an improvement."
where's the proof? They averaged 22 PPG in Big Ten play in 2008, and they averaged 22 in 2009. They gave up more yards per game defensively then they did in 2008. They were worse against Big Ten competition, going from 2-6 to 1-7. The only discernable matter in which Michigan showed improvement was against non-conference competition, where they went 4-0 in 2009 vs. 1-3 in 2008. The idea that Michigan is making progress is blind faith, not fact
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
"Maybe you cant see it , but others can."
Do I THINK Michigan will be a great football team under dickrod? No. Do I WANT them to be a great team under dickrod? Yes.
"I dont think people who know the game of football very well are the ones complaining"
then you haven't been to michigan dot rivals or espn, where the likes of John Borton, Chris Balas, and Adam Ritenberg believe Rodriguez should stay but have held his feet to the fire. and besides, whats your standard for a persons football IQ?
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
You're missing the point, which is that its fallacious to point to one game and say "thats how good they were all season!" I don't actually believe that the miserable offensive performance against illinois sums up our offensive performance in the 2009 season. I bought it up to show how proposterous and rediculous brewhacunts logic is.
And BTW, for what its worth, Forciers 2 fumbles lost nor the wreteched defense accounts for 13 points and 2.6 YPC against a terrible defense. Michigan scored
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Tommy Tuberville. So yes, good to great head coaches produce NFL players. and bad coaches do not. It is extremely important who your head coach is.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
dickrod doesn't make the plays, but its his job to coach them and develope them and put them in a position where they can make plays. He has failed miserably at that job.
also, your examples of Harrsin and Cribbs mean nothing. Of the 10 college programs with the most NFL players right now, all of them had good or great head coaches: Butch Davis/Larry Coker Miami), Jim Tressell, Bobby Bowden, Mark Richt, Lloyd Carr, Philip Fulmer, Nick Saban/Les Miles (LSU), Mack Brown, Urban meyer, and
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
You should also stop calling him derogatory names. He most likely accomplished alot more and helped out others more than you ever had. Show some respect for others. He has a family .
michfoot20 2 years ago
"Show some respect for others. He has a family"
I don't know the man personally, so I have nothing against him personally. I do, however, have a huge problem with what he's done on the field as Michigans head coach. I think he has failed in his job and deserves to be fired. whats wrong with that?
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
lol he has done his job i mean the offense did pretty damn good last year the defensive co was our problem
TheGloveMI 2 years ago
"he has done his job"
No he hasn't. The offense sucked in 2008 (109th nationally) and was bad in 2009 (60th nationally). Scoring wise, they were just as bad against Big Ten competition in 2008 as they were in 2009. Did a amn good job? Yeah, against fucking Deleware State!
How cute that you day everybody shotos down my arguments when its me who gets everyone that argues with me to say 'you're an idiot and are not a Michigan fan.' Strawmans argument at its finest!
Go Blue!
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
@Poole1Dan uhmm the offense sucked in 08 because we were using a walkon on qb and threet who was slower than henne
TheGloveMI 2 years ago
wrong. the offense sucked in 2008 cause dickrod forced his shitty spread option down the teams throats even thougn it didn't fit them and cause he purt the wrong players on the field. He started McGuffie and Shaw at TB even though Minor and Brown were healthy enough to play and were making plays whenever they touched ball. He started Stonum at outside receive in the first 4 games when he had Hemingway healthy. He started fucknig Odoms in the slot when Odoms wasn;t doing shit. he started a
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
true freshman in Koger at TE when he had an experienced, proven playmaker at TE in Carson Butler. Then you've got the faact that greg Frey did a terrible job coaching the o-line (as is evident by the fact that he inherited just as much talent and experience as Andy Moeller did in 2001 but the 2001 o-line was so much better then the 2008 o-line). The inexperience from Threet was only a small part of the offenses woes. Poor COACHING is what fucked us over offensively.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Dont Worry dude poole1dan is a moron he has no idea what hes talking about hence why everyone shoots down every remark he makes
TheGloveMI 2 years ago
I'd take Jake over the Oklahoma City bomber any day
didyosis 2 years ago
Amen!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
is that jordan paskorz kid any good havnt seen any vid on him
yezzirr25 2 years ago
Comment removed
Brewhaman 2 years ago
Check that... I was referring to Christian Pace in that reply, but no, I have not seen any videos out here on Jordan.
Brewhaman 2 years ago
he fits just fine
yezzirr25 2 years ago
They got me rolling too!!!
LOL!!!!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
lol...your a fag
tpay74 2 years ago
Mathews, Minor, Brown, and most of the starters on defense the last two seasons were blue chip recruits. So now, they do not suck. Their dissapointing lack of All Big Ten production is not indicative of their talent, its indicative of dickrod misusing them. Also, whether or not you make it to the NFL is in large part based on how well you are coached in college, not just your pure raw talent, so if Brown and Minor and those guys don't get drafted, it does not mean they suck.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
So it must mean you suck.....jackass!
*quack-quack*
Brewhaman 2 years ago
While I appreciate Threet giving us what he could in year one of the transition...what you have here is another Foole1Fantasy. We'll see what Threet can do when put in the "right" situation. But I also doubt he's a NFL QB.
Wasn't it "rocket arm"?
Brewhaman 2 years ago
Bottom line: Michigan didn't have an experience issue, a talent issue, or an injury issue in 2008 or 2009 on offense. They had a coaching issue. And that starts at the top with dickrod.
I love Brian Cooks line: "they're not excuses, they're reasons." Yeah, reasons to explain away why dickrod doesn't need to be fired!
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
players in Carlos Brown, Brandon Minor, Carson Butler, Junior Hemingway, Greg Mathews, and Kevin Grady. Of those 6 players, only Hemingway was seriously injured, and that still didn't stop dickrod from not utilizing Hemingway in the first 4 games of the season, when he was mostly healthy. So dickrod has no injury excuse with those 6 skill guys. The o-line had 3 relartively experienced players as well (Schilling, orttman, McAvoy), although I'll grant you that Orttman isn't that talented.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Nope. He can't. Not when the majority of his starters on both sides of the ball are juniors or seniors, and when he returns 7/11 starters on offense and 8/11 on defense. Forcier is a returning starter (God that sounds so good to say!). He's no longer inexperienced.
As far as 08 and 09 are concerend, you can't btich about 09 cause he had 10/11 starters returning. And with 08, sure he only had 3/11 starters returning, but he still inherited 6 experience or quasi-experienced skill position
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
to play here anymore. If you can't see this, you're a delusional moron. But then again, I am talking to a guy who thought Nick Sheridan was our starter last season and thought Carrs recruiting classes actually sucked. You should at least take the mgoblog route and bitch about attrition while acknolwedging that carrs classes were indeed really good.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
at least 10 of them signing letters of intent to Michigan. Half of all of Carrs classes were composed of blue chip recruits, whereas under dickrod, the number is lucky to be 25%. Like I said: this is what you get with the culture of losing dickrod has implemented. He hauled in a really good class in 2009 cause he could dismiss the 08 season as an anamoly and could still let the program sell its great name, but now that Michigan has estbalished a trend of losing, the top recruits don't want
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Learn to read. I said that those 5 players were the only ones CONSIDERING us. That doesn't mean they will actually COMMIT to us. Demetrius Hart is the only blue chip recruit who's even close to being a commitment right now. Depreist, McReynolds, Arnett, and Hayes have us on their list of schools they are considering, but they are far from actually commiting much less signing a letter of intent. In the Carr years, Michigan would have around two dozen blue chip recruits considering Michigan and
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
The proof is in the film, he looks like a hard working athlete that can lay the lumber! I think too many people look at the star system to guage how our class is going. If we have some hard working kids coming to Ann Arbor, like Ryan and you mention Vinopal, that want to push these "stars" to get it done, so be it! I agree, this Ryan kid looks solid on this film, give him some time to develope and I think he'll blossom. I'm glad Ryan is coming to Ann Arbor, lord knows we need help!
~GO BLUE!!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
@MICHIGANallDAY2
That's the way I feel too, let him get his players in there and if it gets the same results, THEN talk about RR.
It's kids like this one above (Ryan)that will help the defense, which, IMO, is the problem right now.
Brewhaman 2 years ago
a lot of the losing isn't RR's fault Dan.some of it is.let's just wait til next year to see what'll happen.i thinkwe'll know then if its gonna work or not with RR. i think we're all very frustrated with whats gone on.i believe his system can work. alot of the problems have todeal with the fact that he does things A LOT different andisn't the prototypical "Michigan Man".and also he's fighting against some of the players from Carr's regime and even from his.he's pushing them harder than Carr did
footpedaldave 2 years ago
Not only is he ignorant, the kid tries to come off as some kind of internet bad ass...did you see his profile?? That clown would have trouble fighting his way out of a girl scout convention...give me a friggin break!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
I just don't get why certain people bitch and moan about RR. His offense (which is what he is, an offensive coach) has NOTHING to do with Michigan's troubles...it's the D!!!! You put up 30+ points on offense and still lose? DEFENSE!!!! B10 plays defense, the Big East..not so!If not mistaken,they had 1 ranked defense(Rutgers)in the top 25 D's in the nation.I think RR has finally figured this out after 2 years,hence all the D players being recruited.Good to see he's made it a priority!
~GO BLUE!!
Brewhaman 2 years ago 2
You prove yet again that you are a stupid cunt with no knowledge of football (probably cause you never played the game, or cause you are willfully ignorant, or both). dickrods offense was terrible in 2008 and bad in 2009 (especially against Big Ten competition), and yet you're saying the offense has nothing to do with our woes? What a joke!
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
No, what I have proven time and time again is that you are a shitty fan, with a boat load of personal notes stolen from Rivals/Scouts, that you attempt to use in order to form an illusuion that you some sort of fucking guru.The fact is, you're a sad, lonely dork, the type of fucking nerd I hip checked into hallway lockers on a regular basis.But whatever, continue on with your Donald Duck Lisp *quack-quack*, you're posts are like annoying infomercials at best. Zero content and highly opinionated.
Brewhaman 2 years ago 2
i actually agree with him though Dan i think the offense was solid last season considering freshman mistakes loosing minor and brown and our best lineman (molk) oue defense costs us most them games last year specially the iowa game! I think were a few playmakers and some gerth on defense away from bein a good team,this year will be a huge step in the right direction
AarHart1985 2 years ago
The offense was the #1 scoring offense in the B10, this is why I said, RR's offense IS NOT THE PROBLEM! Foole1Fan doesn't get it, he's got his own agenda.
It's all about the defense the past 3 years, even under Carr/English. But, given the fact that there has been 3 different coordinators in 3 years, you can see, partially, why we've struggled. This fucking embicole only sees it ONE WAY...his way!
He talks about "agreeing to disagree", but he doesn't live by that!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
yeah i agree man and the 1st year under RR the defense had whole roster he inherriated had no depth especially the defense and yeah when u change d-cords as often its all new schemes and more stuff to learn! i think greg robinson is one of the best d-cords there is it will start taking shape this year even though we gotta expect some growing pains still due to lack of upper classmen,But i agree man totally
AarHart1985 2 years ago
You got that right, different coordinators come with different schemes, where is our identitiy? Things will get better if we just continue to recruit and coach these kids up. Having the same coordinator around helps too. And I agree, GRobinsons resume speaks for itself, we got a good coach, just don't have the right puzzle pieces yet, but they're coming!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
fyi its imbecile not "embicole"
footpedaldave 2 years ago
@footpedaldave
thanks!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
No, it was not the NO.1 scoring offense in the Big Ten. Wisconsin led the Big Ten in scoring offense at 31.8 PPG. Look it up.
The last two defenses under Carr and English were ranked 15th and 24th respecitvely in the national rankings. The 2006 defense had the best statistical rush defense of the decade. The 2007 defense gave up only 178 yards passing per game and was ranked 8th nationally. The last two defenses under Carr and English were the shit.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
"The last two defenses under Carr and English were the shit"
LOL!!! Ok Donald, here we go again *quack-quack*, I guess this is why that stellar defense was stung by App. State and TORCHED a week later by Oregon in '07...."the shit", LOL!!!!!
Seriously...only a fucktard like yourself would waste her life with this shit, do us real Michigan fans a favor, stop copying stats, get out and get laid, or, better yet, go step out in front of a bus.
I promise...no one will miss you!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
App State and Oregon proved to be anamolies. The 2007 defense crushed Illinois and their Rose bowl-worthy offense, and we held God, err, Tim Tebow, to a 50% completion percentage, 160 yards passing, and 3.6 YPC. We also thwarted the powerful offenses of Penn State (9 points), Northwestern (16 points), and Purdue (21 points). Yeah, we had a really good defense in 2007, especially in the secondary.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
" anamolies", "ergo", "abeit", "thwarted"...
Kid you spend entirely too much time on mgoblog...get a life!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
whats wrong brewhacunt? Your pee-wee brain can't handle those words?
Maybe mommy can by you a thesaurus for your birthday and you'll learn how to make a coherent argument!
Pussy
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Whats wrong Foole1Fan...you can't come up with anything original?
Did I once again expose you? thought so....
Brewhaman 2 years ago
epic fail
again
I noticed you couldn't come up with a response for what I said about Michigans 2007 defense.
I win
you lose
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Quite the opposite slappy, I know you lack comprehesion skills but I shut that lame shit down when I stated the '07 defense got beat by a 1AA team....once again, you looked like a total horses ass! It must be an awful feeling knowing I'm always here to make you look stupid, but it's just too damm easy. Just hang it up Donald, *quack-quack*, you can't win..I OWN YOU.
It's people like you that birth control and the abortion was invented!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
"the abortion."
LOL. What are you, Miss South Carolina? Wanna tell me where the Iraq is? Perhaps you need a map to find it!
Anyways though, my response to your App State argument what that that loss was an anamoly. The Michigan defense was good to great from the 3rd game of the season on out. Hence why they finished 24th in the nation in total defense, 23rd in scoring defense, and 8th in pass defense, despite facing a duplicity of really good offenses. (=
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Furthermore, if you are going to use the argument of letting one game (App State) sum up the seasons defensive performance, then I will do the same with Michigans offense in 2009. And I choose Michigans 13 point, 3 turnover, 2.6 YPC showing against the WRETCHED defense of Illinois as the microcosm of their season. Which means, by the logic of one old brewhaman, dickrods spread option offense SUCKS. *ba dum ch*
Go Blue!
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Ok , then explain how that '07 defense lost 4 in a row.
They not only lost to App. State & Oregon in '07, back it up even more, they gave up 42 to tUOS and then 30 something to U$C prior to the '07 season!
Your problem, besides being a flaming dork, is u only look at certain aspects of the entire picture to base you lame ass arguments. The fact is, Michigans Woes have nothing...NOTHING to do with RR's offense. D alone is the issue, again, look past your prejudices shit stain!
Brewhaman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Funny. You accuse me of not looking at the big picture and yet you point to one short stretch, or one game, where the defense was bad and then claim thats how it was over the course of a season. You two faced hypocrite! I'll give you the big picture (again): michigans defense in 2006 and 2007 under Ron English only gave up 268.3 yards and 335.7 yards per game respectively (good for 15th nationally and 24th nationally out of 119 teams). Scoring wise, English's defenses only gave up 15.9 and
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
correction: we were 10th nationally in total defense in 2006, not 15th.
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Just look at this page....what a friggin LOSER!!! Cloggin up a fine recruits page with all your bullshit, I'm not even going to read it. It looks like someone (ie YOU) came to this video and smeared shit all over it, nice way to rape someones highlight film...get a life clown!
Brewhaman 2 years ago 11
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I win
You lose
Again
Go Blue!
Poole1Dan 2 years ago
Whatever Looney Tunes,
The only thing you've won is "Shittiest Michigan Fan of Youtube"!
Go take your meds whack job!
Brewhaman 2 years ago 13
@Brewhaman well well well, the 2008 defense ended up having 4 of its 11 starters get drafted (Terrance Taylor, Morgan Trent, Brandon Graham, Stevie Brown). 4 other starters got NFL free agent contracts (Tim Jamison, Will Johnson, Brandon Harrison, Donovan Warren). Meanwhile, Obi Ezeh and Jonas Moutan still have their senior years to go. Turns out John Thompson was the only starter on the 08 defense that lacked talent.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman like I said all along: terrible coaching is what fucked over the 2008 defense, NOT a lack of talent. 8 of the 11 starters on the 08 defense were blue chip recruits, so it makes sense that 8 of them either got drafted or inked free agent deals. The 2008 defense-just like the offense-HAD THE TALENT to help us win a Big Ten championship, beat Ohio State, and win at least 8 games. But we were FUCKED OVER by BAD COACHING from dickrod and his cronnies on both sides of the ball.
Go Blue!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman One last thing: I'll bet it REALLY bothers you that so many starters on the 2008 defense made it to the NFL. Afterall, that just DESTROYS your enrtire argument that bad coaching wasn't the cause of our problems in 2008. History has shown that I was RIGHT. East shit you fat bitch!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poole1Dan
LMAO...You're still an idiot!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan
Steven Threet Update: ASU Spring Game, 9-27 for 117 yards with 3 picks. SOLID!
So much for your judgement on "talent"...LMFAO....you're still a fucking idiot!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman In your raging hatred for a 20 year old dude on youtube, you forgot one of the golden rules of college football: spring game performances must be taken with a grain of salt. Case in point: Keith Nichol and Kirk Cousins look like Tom Brady and Peyton Manning in spartys spring game, but then Cousins goes out there and plays like shit while Nichol is so bad he gets moved to wide receiver. Lets see what Threet does in, you know, REAL GAMES
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan
"you forgot one of the golden rules of college football: spring game performances must be taken with a grain of salt"
Then why were you over at Michigan's spring game highlight offering you stupid, shitty opinions (again)? Running off your dicksuckers about who looks like "shit", whos not cutting it and who you'd love to perform a rusty trombone on.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Then why were you over at Michigan's spring game highlight offering you stupid, shitty opinions"
Because I, like every other fan of every other team, have observations and opinions of their teams spring game. I can take what I see in the spring game with a grain of salt and still have observations and opinions about what happened, which is exactly what I and thousands of other fans have done.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman You, on the other hand, take Threets shitty spring game performance and say that somehow I was wrong about Threet. I've never done that with any player. For example, when I said Brandon Moore deserved to have the ball thrown his way more, I did NOT follow that up by saying he would be the starting TE and would have an all big ten season. You can rightfully say that Threet played shitty in the spring game, but to say i was wrong about him absed on his performance in that game is bogus.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan Whatever...you're once again...grasping at straws, you're an idiot. In this case you don't see that what you're saying about me, you're already doing/done....that's" hypocrisy". You also don't see that your oservations/opinions don't mean shit to anyone but yourself. The bottom line is you can't judge talent, you have too much shit between your ears.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman How am I grasping at straws? where's your evidence to support that blanket statement? Tell me where I was wrong in the explanation I gave you yesterday about my opinions and observations of Michigans spring game. Also, being a hypocrite has NOTHING to do with "doing/done." A hypocrite is a person who says you shou;dn't do something and then does that exact same thing. Look it up you uneducated redneck hillbilly clown
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poole1StupidFuckDan: "A hypocrite is a person who says you shou;dn't do something and then does that exact same thing"
Exactly stupid fuck, you tell me to take spring practice with "a grain of salt", THEN, you're over giving your dumb opinions on Michigans Spring game...see the correlation? It's right there...open your fucking eyelids LOSER! As I mentioned in the past, not only are you Schitzo, unmedicated and Delusional...you're a walking fucking contradiction!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "THEN, you're over giving your dumb opinions on Michigans Spring game"
How is that being hypocritical? Unlike you, I never said that any one player is going to suck or is going to dominate based on what happened in the spring game. if you said that Threet was bad in the spring game and doesn't deserve to start, then I would not have argued with you. But you said that I was somehow wrong about my predictions for Threet on game day during the season, which is what I grilled you for.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "you're a walking fucking contradiction"
and you have yet to prove how I've contradicted myself. I dare you to keep trying.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan
I'm not even going to waste my fucking time with you on these 2 subjects. It's obvious your are everything you try to pin a me, a hipocrite probably being the biggest. I could travel youtube to visit each one of your comments and point out how 95% of what you post is contradicting, but it would be nothing more than a waste of time, you're just an umedicated schitzo.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "I'm not even going to waste my fucking time with you on these 2 subjects"
I figured as such. Thats cause you CAN'T PROVE IT.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan:
"Thats cause you CAN'T PROVE IT" (Contradiction after contradiction, bombed predictions, hipocrisy, delusion and several other unmedicated dribble)
It's all over out here Puddles, jump to each recruiting video and it's right there, for the entire UM fanbase to whitness... Foole1Fan barking from the anal walls of insanity.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Contradiction after contradiction, bombed predictions, hipocrisy,"
1. where are my contradictions?
2. where's my hypocrisy
3. what do faulty predctions have to do with the contradictions ahd hypocrisy you claim i have?
4. if its all over out there, then can't you just give me one example? hmm?
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan, seroiusly, do you read the shit you type? It's just rediculous, read the top 2 comments of thispage....they still apply!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-
"1. where are my contradictions?" Saying Roundtree will never be a playmaker, then coming back saying you weren't taking your medication when speculating and was wrong.
"2. where's my hypocrisy" Shamelessly calling me a hipocrite for stating the obvious with Threet and Trent, when all you do is BASH players
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Saying Roundtree will never be a playmaker, then coming back saying you weren't taking your medication when speculating and was wrong."
shit, i should give you credit for making an effort! But alas, I debunked this already on Roundtrees video, and I'll do it again: thats not contradicting myself either. contradicting myself would be me saying Forciers great on one video and on the same day (or the same week, or possibly the same month if its the offseason) say Forcier sucks on
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman another video. But a contradiction of my assessment is beyond my control and therefore cannot be blamed on me. Everything I said about Roundree i said before he became productive. therefore, i have not contradicted myself
"Shamelessly calling me a hipocrite for stating the obvious with Threet and Trent, when all you do is BASH players"
there's absolutely no hypocrisy there. I have NEVER said you shouldn't bash players, so i can bash players all i want and not be a hypocrite.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-
"3. what do faulty predctions have to do with the contradictions ahd hypocrisy you claim i have?" You bash, then when your statment doesn't hold the any truth, you come back and withdrawl your dumb comment...contradiction.
"4. if its all over out there, then can't you just give me one example? hmm?" Re-read 1-3.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "You bash, then when your statment doesn't hold the any truth, you come back and withdrawl your dumb comment...contradiction"
as i just got done explaining, a contradiction of my assessment is NOT a contradiction of myself (which is what you've been talking about). Everything I said about Roundree i said before he became productive. therefore, i have not contradicted myself.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Re-read 1-3."
I give you credit for attemtping to give examples, but I have debunked them, as everybody can now see on this video
Go blue!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poope1Fan
" but I have debunked them, as everybody can now see on this video"
Look at the top rated comments on this channel...NO ONE agrees w/you piss-ant!
I can't help you're too fucking stupid to see my examples in clarity
You haven't "debunked" anything, on the contrary, you've done nothing but made yourself look pathetic by all the switching of subjects and grasping at straws that have become the norm with you.
You're still a fucking idiot...."Go blue"?...LOL!! Ok dumbass...
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Look at the top rated comments on this channel."
thats irrelevant. fact remains that anubody on youtube can read the comments and see what we've said to eachother and see the charges you've bought against me and see how I responded to each of them. whether they ultimitely agree with me or you is their own decision, and quite frankly is a decision that doesn't mean much to me
the rest of what you said was, as per usualy, ad hominem attacks.
Go Blue!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-" thats irrelevant", maybe to you and only you.
"anubody on youtube can read the comments and see what we've said to eachother"
Right, yours are getting flagged as SPAM, mine are being agreed with, fruitcake.
"a decision that doesn't mean much to me", yes it does, it deflates your entire youtube existence, you should be ashamed of your self puddles.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "yours are getting flagged as SPAM"
the hypocrisy of brewhaman shows again: you chide me for when my comments are marked as spam, and what do you do? MARK YOUR OWN FUCKING COMMENTS AS SPAM!!! I haven't done that to myself once. My commnets only get marked as spam by people who disagree with me. this is nothing compared to a coward who marks many of his own comments as SPAM the day that he posts them!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "it deflates your entire youtube existence"
this coming from a dude who has half the channell views I do despite being on youtube a year and a half longer, has made no videos vs. me maknig over a dozen, and has 43 youtube friends vs. my 239? If my youtube existense has been deflated, then what the hell does that make yours in comparison?
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Dan:
"from a dude who has half the channell views I do despite being on youtube a year and a half longer" I can't blame folks for looking at your channel after reading the nonsense you snail-trail youtube with.
"has made no videos vs. me maknig over a dozen" As much as you think people enjoy YOUR videos...Get a life, you bumb!
"has 43 youtube friends vs. my 239" I pick and choose who I'm friends with, carefully, might I add, after accepting and abolishing our friendship.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "I can't blame folks for looking at your channel after reading the nonsense"
even so, how the fuck would my youtube existence be deflated if people are going to my channell and and getting an idea of who i am? the fact that I have twoce the channel viewd you do shoots down your argument that my youtube existense has been inflated, as you doing that is the pot calling the kettle black. PATHETIC!!!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman They can love or hate my videos. bottom line is I get a couple thousand views on them, which makes me happy and which debunks your idea that i don't have a youtube existence anymore.
"I pick and choose who I'm friends with"
thats fine, but don't be chiding me for supposedly not having a youtube existense in face of such a fact. you saying i have no youtube existence despite these facts shows you are grasping at straws and a pathetic attempt to personally attack me.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poole1Dan "in face of such a fact"
that fact being that i have 239 youtube friends while you have 43.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-
Like I said, if I accepted every invite that was offered, I'd have 239 looking as shamefull as each one of your posts. If you accept anyones invitation, like I did when accepting, then rejecting your friendship, you get a lot of dumfucks (like you) that don't know what the fuck they're talking about. But go ahead, pride yourself on 239 friends you fucking Moron, I'm laughing at your stupidity!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman y"ou get a lot of dumfucks (like you) that don't know what the fuck they're talking about."
you are once again missing the point, which is that you cannot chide me for not having a youtube existence anymore when I've got 239 friends compared to your 43. I id didn't have a youtube existence, then I would have, you know, 0 youtube friends, dumbfucks or Einsteins. so shut the fuck up about me not having a youtube existence when the facts show its false.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan:
"about me not having a youtube existence"
When you pride yourself on being into politics (which is why you continuee to refute the truth as I I present it to you) and being a "EXPERT" (your words, not mine junior) on Michigan football, I CAN "chide" you. You've open yourself up to so much shit out here, it's hailarious you're still even here. I could go on, but it's pointless.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "I CAN "chide" you."
then chide me for things that are factual, such as the fact that I hate dickrod and think Martavious Odoms is a shitty receiver, cause me not having a youtube existence is not factual and just shows you are making shit up at me and grasping at straws.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poopee1Fan: " grasping at straws"?
Do you come up with anything on your own? All you do is regurgitate BLOG terminology and pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself. Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry.
"you are making shit up at me" hardly the case creampuff. You just can't accept me sinking every bullshit comment you put out here.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "Do you come up with anything on your own? "
in terms of my vocabulary? No. Why would I need to? theres a billion people who know millions of words of english. there ain't nothing to come up with that someone hasn't already said before. BTW, you have once again proven that you CANNOT refute the substance of what I say, so you call me out for my fucking vocabulary! Pitiful, just pitiful!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan " in terms of my vocabulary? No. Why would I need to?"
Because this is what "educated" folks do, they come up with thier own ideals, not stolen from the person they're losing an argument to or stolen from the idealogy of a fucking BLOG!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "Because this is what "educated" folks do"
False. Like I said yesterday (and which you utterly failed to refute): theres a billion people who know millions of words of english. there ain't nothing to come up with that someone hasn't already said before
"they come up with thier own ideals"
vocabulary is neither an ideal or a patented idea. It is something that everyone has and that anyone of a given language can use. I am NOT borrowing your vocab, as it wasn't yours to begin with
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman and I say again: you have proven that you CANNOT refute the substance of what I say, so you call me out for my fucking vocabulary! Pitiful, just pitiful!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself"
bullshit. you do not have a patent on the term 'grasping at straws.' Nobody does. they aren;t YOUR terminology. they are everyones terminology. anyone who can speak english can say it.
"Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry."
Not on Michigan football it hasn't, which, you know, is what we were talking about, not fucking vocabulary.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "pick and choose words form my vocabulary to defend yourself"
bullshit. you do not have a patent on the term 'grasping at straws.' Nobody does. they aren;t YOUR terminology. they are everyones terminology. anyone who can speak english can say it.
"Looks like your so called well of knowledge has ran dry."
Not on Michigan football it hasn't, which, you know, is what we were talking about, not fucking vocabulary.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "hardly the case creampuff. "
wrong. you said I have no youtube existense, which I have proven to be a falsehood. therefore, you were making shit up about me when you said I have no youtube existence. no go back to your whore house
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poopee1Fan-
"the rest of what you said was, as per usualy, ad hominem attacks"
And THIS, as per usually, is YOUR cop out. There are no such "ad hominem" attacks, my comments are fully backed by logic and facts. Throwing up some fancy Latin term (that again, is being used incorrectly)does nothing for your credibility, you're a moron that knows nothing about the game of football. Your pathetic attempt to look smart is just hilarious....complete FAILURE!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman first of all, you marked this post as spam after bashing me for having my posts marked a sspam. say one thing to another: a brewhaman story
"my comments are fully backed by logic and facts"
bullshit, I bring issues of substance to the table, and you're response is invariably reduced to 'you're still an idiot, you're a shitty fan, shut the fuck up, your posts are too long' and all sorts of other fallacious arguments that automatically make me the winner of the debate.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-
"automatically make me the winner of the debate"
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They get better and better....
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "you're a moron that knows nothing about the game of football."
see, thats what i mean. you make blanket ad hominem statements as the basis of your arguments against me. there's no facts or logic behind this, just personal venom. i don't respond to these arguments cause they automatically make me the winner. you can't address the substance of what I say, so you resort to shit like that.
But hell, keep it up. makes me know I'm kicking your ass in the arena of substance (:
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poope1Fan, " i don't respond to these arguments"
But then you follow it up with 5 posts? Geeeeezus, can you just summarize? Hasn't anyone taught you that at Oakland U?
"bullshit, I bring issues of substance to the table, I'm kicking your ass in the arena of substance"
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "But then you follow it up with 5 posts"
i followed it up with one post. the rest of my posts were on issues of substance. dude, get hooked on phonix and develope some damn reading skills that way you can deferentiate between substance and ad hominem!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poopee1Fan-"dude, get hooked on phonix"
Why? It obviously hasn't helped you. "Dude"? How much jibber do you smoke on a daily basis? Maybe that's the issue here....
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman"Geeeeezus, can you just summarize?"
thanks for fitting my description of you to a tee! i just got done saying in another video that you launch ad hominem attacks against me, and one example I gave of you was 'your posts are too lnog! learn to summarize!' I swear, me arguing with you is like playing with playdough!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poopee1Fan: " ad hominem attacks" again with the fancy Latin terms that you gained knowlege from, on a fucking BLOG (but still uses the term incorrectly).
"'your posts are too lnog! learn to summarize"
Yes, learn something about both, you're on youtube, not giving a thesis on what happens to the human mind when unmedicated(i.e. your stupid opinions).
"me arguing with you is like playing with playdough" And me conversing with you is like arguing with a child about taking her meds!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "but still uses the term incorrectly"
false. You have repeatedly addressed the substance of what I say by calling me names and attacking me as a person instead of addressing the substance of what I say, which is exactly what an ad hominem attack is (a fallacious argument against the person)
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Poope1Fan: " instead of addressing the substance of what I say"
97% of what you say is bullshit, sorry I'm picking apart your pathetic stance, deal with it. I find the holes in everything you post, sorry I won't discuss the bullshit portions.
"then chide me for things that are factual"
I HAVE! I've whooped that adolescent ass up and down this board!
"grasping at straws"? Can't come up w/your own terminology? Your vocabulary is very limited...
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "97% of what you say is bullshit"
this is yet another stat that you have pulled out of your ass and that has no basis whatsoever. go back and read the thousands of posts I made and prove that 97% of what I've said is bullshit, then we can talk.
"sorry I'm picking apart your pathetic stance"
no need to apologize. you ain't picking apart nothing. I've debunked every single bullet of substance you've thrown at me and reduced you to luanching fllacious ad hominem attacks. Me wins!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "I HAVE! "
not in this case you didn't. you chided me for having no youtube existence, which I exposed as an outright falsehood. so like I said: chide me for things that are factual, such as my attacks on odoms and dickrod and others
"Can't come up w/your own terminology?"
can't you address the substance of what I say? No/ didn't think so.
faggot
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan-" you chided me for having no youtube existence"
-Your creditability of knowing football/talent and coaching is in the shitter Lisper. --You don't know what the fuck you're talking about from one post to the next. Furthermore, you're too stuck in the way things used to be, and the way things "should be". You think like an idealist. your existence on here is just a big pile of SPAM!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "Your creditability of knowing football/talent and coaching is in the shitter"
1. I've already proven this to be a falsehood time and again by citing examples of predictions that I got right
2. even so, my knowledge of Michigan football has nothing to do with my my supposed lack of youtube existence. you have switcehd the topic from my youtube existence to my knowledge of football cause I have completely debunked your myth that i have no youtube existence. winner: Poole1Dan!
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "Furthermore, you're too stuck in the way things used to be, and the way things "should be". You think like an idealist"
1. again, this has nothing to do with my youtube existence. thanks for switching the topic and showing I destroyed your ass on the idea that I ahve no youtube existence
2. No, I'm not an idealist. an idealist thinks in unrealistic terms. I think in terms of facts and logic and history. I'm a realist, not an idealist.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "your existence on here is just a big pile of SPAM!"
which does not mean I have no youtube existence, which was your original claim. just admit it: you were WRONG when you said I have no youtube existence
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan " just admit it: you were WRONG when you said I have no youtube existence"
You might have an existence in the literal term of the word, but any creditability you think you have is GONE Lisper. You might as well pack up your shit and move on to somewhere else (may I suggest a Buckeye Blog w/all your UM blasphemy), because anything you post out here now is pure garbage.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "You might have an existence in the literal term of the word"
thank you! at least I squeezed that of you your plumb ass!
"any creditability you think you have is GONE"
once again you switch the subject after I completely DEBUNK your claim on the original topic. Loser.
As far as my credibility is concerned, I'm going to invoke part of my youtube moto: I'm loved by some, hated by others. That's what happens when you are obsessed with the Michigan Wolverines
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "may I suggest a Buckeye Blog w/all your UM blasphemy"
1. I don't blasphemy U-M. Never have, never will
2. I hate the Buckeyes. I'm a Michigan fan. why would i go to a stupid Buckeyes blog?
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan- "Can't come up w/your own terminology?"
"can't you address the substance of what I say?"
Is that what they teach you at the community college, to answer questions with a question....nice!
Brewhaman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Brewhaman "Is that what they teach you at the community college, to answer questions with a question"
1. Oakland University is not a community college, nor s it perceived as one by people not named brewhaman
2. answering a question with a question is a common tactic used in arguments or debates. ain't nothing wrong with doing that.
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "you're on youtube, not giving a thesis"
doesn't matter. on both youtube and in a thesis or a research paper, I often have alot that i need to say. So how about addressing what i actually say instead of attacking me for being too long and losing the debate to me automatically?
Poole1Dan 1 year ago
@Poopee1Fan: " I often have alot that i need to say"...isn't that the truth, you're like an annoying info commercial.
"and losing the debate to me automatically?"
Earth to Lisper, come in Lisper...I'm not debating you, that's not what this is about. It's about me trying to make you a better fan.
Brewhaman 1 year ago
@Brewhaman "I'm not debating you, that's not what this is about. "
a person who is getting his ass kicked in the debate would say something hilarious like that! But hey, at least you've maned up and faced the truth, which is that I am debating you and have kicked your ass all over youtube in terms of substance while you resort to attacking me personally and make a futile attempt to 'make me a better fan' (IE, a fan that brewhaman approves of)
Poole1Dan 1 year ago