who the fuck is this bitch? hillary was laughed out of congress and told to put her idealist dreams behind her she was in a mans world, funny when she finally got some power she did not mention 1 thing about health care reform, it's called being bought out. who is going to get rich off this is my question. after all people think abe lincoln just freed the slaves. haha know your history bitch!
The fact that this little girl pisses off so many basement masturbaters is proof that she's doing her job well. While she actually has made something useful of her life her YouTube critics throw poop at her from their mother's basment, wearing their mother's pantyhose and jerking off, wasting their pathetic lives. They amount to nothing. Keep kickin' ass, Michelle!
I want to LOL at teabaggers and birthers, but it's just sad. We as a country are left with these nutjobs on one side, and the incompetent democrats on the other.
This Asian dumb cunt doesn't deserve American prosperity - she deserves to go back to Asia and make a few dollars a day selling her asshole to male sex tourists.
Michelle Malkin is a lying deceitful cunt ! I remember what she said about Ron Paul & his supporters. Go crawl back into your hole you nasty she devil ! Your nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing & when it benefits you you'll turn on everyone you claim to be behind. Dirty skank !
Ofcoarse no one here remembers the Ron Paul Blimp and the Ron Paul Tea Party we had in Boston during the election. Fox News took a giant dump in our grassroots movement and claimed it as there own sprinkling their fair share of neo cons into the foray. There is a big disinformation battle going on and healthcare is only the tip of the iceberg.
If your speaking about Republicans, I'll go further and say there are 3 types of Republicans. There are Neo-Cons such as Michelle Malkin, Evangelists such as Pat Robertson, and then there are Constitutionalists such as Ron Paul. The Evangelists are pawns and will go with whatever the Neo-Con agenda is...after all they hijacked the party after they tried to kill and drugged Reagan. Constitutionalists are trying to take the party back in a hopeless effort as the party is now viewed the Bush party
MartyGras82 - "3 types of Republicans." I like they way your catagorize people and then deamonize them... This is exactly the tactic used by Hitler and the Nazi Party. The similarities between Democrats and Nazis is scary. Both are led by a foreigner. Both have zero toleration of others. Both need a scapegoat. The only good thing is that Obama will be out of office in 2012. He will not be able to pass an Enabling Act like Hitler did.
Yes...my intention was to demonize the fringe group that has hijacked the Republican Party...the Neo-Con Agenda. And yes, I took a jab at Evangelists as well. I am by no means a Democrat and definitely not Fascist. As a Republican, I reserve my right as an American to have Zero toleration towards elitests who try to perverse the Constitution of this Great Nation.
The KKK is getting stronger, day by day. Instead of carrying crosses, they carry the American flag, say "god" a few thousand times and yell at the top of their lungs. We have some serious "wack jobs" in America and we need to do the same thing in their CHURCHES! Let's see how the GOD LOVING FREAKS react to that?
LOL, you speak of the KKK as if they all have the same ideology. There are over 200 groups masquerading around as the KKK and many of them hate each other.
Marty, I understand what you are saying but when it comes down to it the KKK and all similar groups represent the same thing. Hate for anyone other than white and christian, but of course with their own spin to their religious views of right and wrong. They are all "the same" to me.
I do LOVE your view on the three types of Republicans. I thought they were being viewed as the "Cheney" party? The man behind the idiot?
Malkin is an idiot. These "tea parties" amounted to nothing, idiots who do not realize Republican and Bush policies got us here and are the reason for tax increases now. Why didn't they protest Bush spending? Republicans have been trying to reverse FDR policies for decades and have been trying to redistribute the majority of wealth back to the 1% of society. Trickle down economics. Remember?
i'd be disturbed by this, but the tea-party movement already sputtered out. at this point, freaking out over every little comment about it just isn't worth the energy.
Did I just see Michelle Malkin explaining what's up to George Stephanopoulos? Because that's like Buddy Hackett explaining to Frank Sinatra how to sing "My Way"
mcclures1993 - Good point... On the other side you have The Dixie Chicks, Bill Maher, Babs Streisand and Janine Garafolo. I think they have a total of one High School diploma between the six of them.
Ya private companies gouge the human race and the government can give health care no problem....public companies are not the angels you make them out to be.Malkin is an angry nut-bar Republican with no facts.
yes a trifecta of leadership...palin, coulter and malkin. hate will return, lies will be their platform, and those who don't buy their ignorance, bigotry and intolerance will be jailed.
Actually, MamoDad, she's simply speaking on behalf of the unheard voice; a voice from those that are ignored in Washington and who are millions of American citizens and taxpayers.
ah, yes i agree derwin, but that voice is from the fringe right. the same group of birthers who call obama a racist, a socialist and a communist.
while those people should have a voice and be heard, they should also be ignorned as the nut ball "christian"republican haters they really are. after all, they did lose the election. the majority spoke telling them their policies sans ideas, are useless.
Hey derwin24, where was that unheard voice when Bush bailed out AIG for $87 billion, Wall Street for $700 billion, & the automakers(some of whom still declared bankruptcy) for $17.4 billion? Oh, that's right. It wasn't Socialism, Communism, fascism, or Marxism then. But now it IS? It never was. It's called baseless fearmongering
The fringe far far right has the GOP now, & it's bad. I feel bad for normal conservative Republicans. The "Tea-baggers" & "birthers" are at odds with them...
Bush did a lot things wrong near the end of his term in office. The last two years especially. I did not agree with his policies or his spending then, and in retrospect I still don't agree with them.
That is not to say, like you would have it, that he could implement these liberal policies alone. Congress jumped at the chance to support these spending bills. Just look at roll call to see for yourself who voted them in.
He created the policy. It came from his desk. You're making excuses here. Where was your outrage then?
It simply didn't exist. Now when Obama comes into office with a recession/depression from Bush, his hands are tied economically, yet some incorrectly scream "Socialism". That's Bush's fault. He handed the man a failed economy, & war in two different theaters. I'm not saying Obama can't make mistakes. In fact he has, & will make more, but consider the real circumstances here...
Bolgernow- just a point of fact here.. and this will help you in 7th grade Social Studies... All spending Bills start in the House. The President does not create any bills. After a bill is passed by the House and Senate, the President can then sign it into law. The President can influence the bills, but he cannot introduce them. At least that is how it works in the USA.
"just a point of fact here...All spending Bills start in the House". Holy shit, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it fucked you, then you had fact babies...
"The law requires that, by the first Monday in February, the President submit to Congress his proposed Federal budget for the next fiscal year, which begins October 1."
You're so used to lying, you don't even understand the most basic facts in our government.
Bolgernow - maybe Egnlish isn't your mother language, but there is a difference between what the President does by submitting a proposed budget and what the legislative houses do by actually creating real bills.
You foul mouth is just a sign of your intellectual emptiness.
Bolgernow- I don't know where you were, but there was plenty of right wingers yelling about the Bush bailouts. The basic idea they have is that the gov't should not take peoples money to bail out any business. The difference with what is happening now is just the size of the bailouts. Fearmongering? It does not seem that labelling something should cause any fear. But, if you area afraid of the word 'Socialist' that is your issue.
Bolgernow - the Conservatives tend not to demonstrate against everything. It took a few times of the gov't taking their money and redistributing it to big business before they got riled enough to demonstrate. But, if you knew how to read, you would have noticed that there where many conservatives speaking against the Bush spending.
Socialism is a form of gov't where individual liberties are superseded by the needs of the masses. Why does this scare you?
You do not even understand the definition of Socialism. It's an economic system distinct from capitalism. We are still, & always will be a Capitalistic society. Socialism is where the government owns/operates/controls all production/profit/overhead in making clothes, food, homes, phones, coffee, TV's, Newspapers, & any free market product one could consume. That's not the case. According to your logic the Post Office, Army, & FDIC are ALL Socialist since they're run by the government. Nope
Bolgernow - Socialism also includes gov't provided education, welfare, regulation of communication. In many ways the US is Socialist. I just don't understand why you are scared by that. Giving something a proper label is a way of helping define and understand. It seems that you want to promote a Socialist agenda, but be free of any definitions or labels. Is it because you are ashamed of your idiology?
I am pointing out how insane your claim is. According to YOUR definition of Socialism, not the dictionary's, our Post Office, Army, & FDIC are all socialist. How come you're not protesting those? Because that's simply not the case. There are things the government does pretty well & we are happy to have them do it. We're a capitalistic society, always will be. You are fear mongering for neo-con partisan political reasons. You sound obtuse...
Bolgernow - it is not 'my' definition of Socialism. It is from "Das Kapital" by Karl Marx. According to Marxian idiology, yes, those things are part of a Socialist society. We are truly a mixure of Capitalism and Socialism. We are not and never have been a 'pure' capitalist society.
You still have not explained why you fear the label "Socialist." It is just a description for some of the ways the gov't works. You support these, so why do you fear being defined?
How can you stand for this? Shouldn't we outlaw the post office? The Army? FDIC? Why does our government have anything to do with these free market ideas? Yet, I'm not hearing that. You should be protesting banks, mail, or our soldier's in uniform. They're taking your freedom away...
You're incorrectly labeling something & I'm calling you out. It'd be like calling an XXXL shirt a parachute. That's the entire point.
Bolgernow - you seem to be mixing up somebody else's comments with mine. I guess that is what smoking crack will do...
I will make my point again, in a very simple way, so that even a nine year old can understand:
Socialism is a term that describes in some way what the gov't is doing. You support this. But - and here is my point - Why are you so fearful of the word "SOCIALISM"?
You seem to be humiliated by your own idiology. Why?
Not confusing any comment ;) AGAIN, Socialism is where EVERY durable good, service, or product is owned/operated/created by the government. Are we Cuba? No. Does the government own the GAP, Starbucks, JcPenny, Sunglasses Hut, Pizza Hut, Dell, Apple? No. If they did we would be a SOCIALIST country. We're a capitalistic country with regulated open market products, & some services run by the government. Are government highways socialist? No. The key component to Socialism is Market Socialism.
Bolgernow- Socialism is not Communism. When a gov't owns the means of product for an industry... like cars... that is something that can be considered Socialism. Or when the gov't controls all Health Care. Or when the gov't owns Banks. This is Socialistic.
Why are you afraid of that word? If you beleive our gov't should do these things, then you should be proud of it.
It is not 'fearmongering' to use the word Socialism. If you are afraid of it, then don't support it.
What? If you feel Medicare, the Army, the Post Office, control of federal highways, FDIC are socialist why aren't you protesting against & labeling them as hard as you do Obama?
That makes no logical sense. You're picking & choosing your "socialism label outrage". That's silly...
Bolgernow- I am not protesting Obama! All I did was point out that your comment about there being no opposition to Bush's actions was false. You made a statement that had no basis in reality. On top of that, you support Socialist ideas and at the same time anhore the name "Socialist."
You need to stop lying and stand up for your idiology. If you want gov't control of Health Care, Car building, Banking... then good for you. But, be a man and stand up for your beleifs.
Incorrect. You do. You said, "The difference with what is happening NOW is just the size of the bailouts". That's speaking to this administration specifically...
"Idiology"? You have labeled me without knowing my views. If you can not resolve the massive problem in your position that "the government bailouts now are now Socialist" without raising a SINGLE issue over Bush's, or current governments control of the Army, the Post Office, federal highways being Socialist. You make no sense...
Bolgernow- I think you are now arguing my point. There was plenty of criticism of the Bush bailouts. And now there is even more of Obama's bailouts. The amount of the bailout keeps getting higher and that seems to get people a bit more riled. So, it appears that you now agree with what I have been saying.
If you want to label the Army, the Post Office, federal highways as being Socialist, that is fine with me. I would probably disagree with the Army part, but if it makes you feel good...
Not remotely. You're a neo-con spam account. Bolgernow is my boyfriend. He was just "blocked" here because he called you out as a neo-con troll. You're weak, lie, spin, & attack others. You have no facts to support your claims.
Comment removed
pretorious700 1 year ago
My Haiku...
If they get power
they'll send her back to where folks
look much more like her
Di0genesus 1 year ago
This bitch is a neocon fraud.
The real tea party is neither democrat or republican, those fuckers are the same party, all banker puppets and they need to be booted out of office!
The US is paying 7000 billion on interest to the debt alone to these banking cunts, it's criminal!!
GtheMVP 1 year ago
who the fuck is this bitch? hillary was laughed out of congress and told to put her idealist dreams behind her she was in a mans world, funny when she finally got some power she did not mention 1 thing about health care reform, it's called being bought out. who is going to get rich off this is my question. after all people think abe lincoln just freed the slaves. haha know your history bitch!
Axenmoon 1 year ago
boo not hot
furgrayfreak 2 years ago
fur gay freak - she would whoop the shit out of you in a debate though huh idiot?
KingDingaLing090 1 year ago
The fact that this little girl pisses off so many basement masturbaters is proof that she's doing her job well. While she actually has made something useful of her life her YouTube critics throw poop at her from their mother's basment, wearing their mother's pantyhose and jerking off, wasting their pathetic lives. They amount to nothing. Keep kickin' ass, Michelle!
NebraskasWallpaper 2 years ago
Go Michelle!
Shadowsnshades 2 years ago
I want to LOL at teabaggers and birthers, but it's just sad. We as a country are left with these nutjobs on one side, and the incompetent democrats on the other.
eunicron 2 years ago
This Asian dumb cunt doesn't deserve American prosperity - she deserves to go back to Asia and make a few dollars a day selling her asshole to male sex tourists.
twochordcool 2 years ago
that ho has to suck rupert murdochs shriveled penis everyday to get on air, theres no other reason i can think of why they let that woman on tv
NMghost223 2 years ago 2
Malkin whips up these morons hands down.
Search on youtube for the entire segment.
At one point Malkin makes them all look so stupid, the black woman ends up throwing eye daggers at her.
lees20022 2 years ago
Michelle Malkin is a lying deceitful cunt ! I remember what she said about Ron Paul & his supporters. Go crawl back into your hole you nasty she devil ! Your nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing & when it benefits you you'll turn on everyone you claim to be behind. Dirty skank !
Never forget !!
/watch?v=j_qUvgfzuPM
wingnut4427 2 years ago 2
Ofcoarse no one here remembers the Ron Paul Blimp and the Ron Paul Tea Party we had in Boston during the election. Fox News took a giant dump in our grassroots movement and claimed it as there own sprinkling their fair share of neo cons into the foray. There is a big disinformation battle going on and healthcare is only the tip of the iceberg.
MartyGras82 2 years ago
If your speaking about Republicans, I'll go further and say there are 3 types of Republicans. There are Neo-Cons such as Michelle Malkin, Evangelists such as Pat Robertson, and then there are Constitutionalists such as Ron Paul. The Evangelists are pawns and will go with whatever the Neo-Con agenda is...after all they hijacked the party after they tried to kill and drugged Reagan. Constitutionalists are trying to take the party back in a hopeless effort as the party is now viewed the Bush party
MartyGras82 2 years ago 2
MartyGras82 - "3 types of Republicans." I like they way your catagorize people and then deamonize them... This is exactly the tactic used by Hitler and the Nazi Party. The similarities between Democrats and Nazis is scary. Both are led by a foreigner. Both have zero toleration of others. Both need a scapegoat. The only good thing is that Obama will be out of office in 2012. He will not be able to pass an Enabling Act like Hitler did.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Yes...my intention was to demonize the fringe group that has hijacked the Republican Party...the Neo-Con Agenda. And yes, I took a jab at Evangelists as well. I am by no means a Democrat and definitely not Fascist. As a Republican, I reserve my right as an American to have Zero toleration towards elitests who try to perverse the Constitution of this Great Nation.
MartyGras82 2 years ago
The KKK is getting stronger, day by day. Instead of carrying crosses, they carry the American flag, say "god" a few thousand times and yell at the top of their lungs. We have some serious "wack jobs" in America and we need to do the same thing in their CHURCHES! Let's see how the GOD LOVING FREAKS react to that?
stoptherightwing 2 years ago 2
LOL, you speak of the KKK as if they all have the same ideology. There are over 200 groups masquerading around as the KKK and many of them hate each other.
MartyGras82 2 years ago
Marty, I understand what you are saying but when it comes down to it the KKK and all similar groups represent the same thing. Hate for anyone other than white and christian, but of course with their own spin to their religious views of right and wrong. They are all "the same" to me.
I do LOVE your view on the three types of Republicans. I thought they were being viewed as the "Cheney" party? The man behind the idiot?
stoptherightwing 2 years ago
Tea-Parties. "Grassroots movement" sponsored and hosted by FOX News
ProgressiveAction10 2 years ago
Malkin is an idiot. These "tea parties" amounted to nothing, idiots who do not realize Republican and Bush policies got us here and are the reason for tax increases now. Why didn't they protest Bush spending? Republicans have been trying to reverse FDR policies for decades and have been trying to redistribute the majority of wealth back to the 1% of society. Trickle down economics. Remember?
zaurakdigis 2 years ago
i'd be disturbed by this, but the tea-party movement already sputtered out. at this point, freaking out over every little comment about it just isn't worth the energy.
okyesplease 2 years ago
Did I just see Michelle Malkin explaining what's up to George Stephanopoulos? Because that's like Buddy Hackett explaining to Frank Sinatra how to sing "My Way"
spamdango 2 years ago
can you show me where bill o'reilly said that? it'd make a great quote
boing3887 2 years ago
youtube
'right wing attack dogs turn on each other'
spamdango 2 years ago 2
spamdango - dude... Frank Sinatra is dead. Even Buddy Hackett is smart enough to not try and explain things to dead people.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Neo-con spam account. Nothing more...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Wha...? NOOOOOOOOO
spamdango 2 years ago
Bill O'reilly, talking about rightwing radio personalities - "These idiots are misleading you. They're lying to you. They're rich, these guys.
Hey, YOU'RE gonna get it. Not them! That foreign investment pulls out, we are toast. And they'll pull out if this bailout doesnt happen.
Are you getting the message here? Walk away from these liers, these right-wing liers. They're not looking out for you. "
spamdango 2 years ago
we know that the conservative movement has come to a dangerous moment when bill o'reilly is the moderate voice of warning against extremism
boing3887 2 years ago 2
Conservative right wing tea-baggers are traitors. Period.
AllStarKase 2 years ago
Conservatives tried to call war protestors traitors, and I was offended then. Now that Obama's in office, we should have more dignity than they did.
Their rhetoric is disturbing, but yours is as well. Enough with the traitor talk.
okyesplease 2 years ago
Malkin, get tea-bagged, already, would ya?
AllStarKase 2 years ago
she has no solutions.
eye7view 2 years ago
You can see who is on the right side of these arguments when you take a look at the spokesmen--Malkin, Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity? Please...
mcclures1993 2 years ago
mcclures1993 - Good point... On the other side you have The Dixie Chicks, Bill Maher, Babs Streisand and Janine Garafolo. I think they have a total of one High School diploma between the six of them.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
grassroots my ass,
these tea party freaks take their order directly from limbaugh and beck
chickenbutt357 2 years ago
Health-care/wealth-care...let the free market work... the government can't make it what they want, but they can sure screw it up!!
AUTuck 2 years ago
Ya private companies gouge the human race and the government can give health care no problem....public companies are not the angels you make them out to be.Malkin is an angry nut-bar Republican with no facts.
humaner 2 years ago
I'm sorry that feel so helpless...that only a large government can make your life worthwhile...I prefer to make my own gains...
AUTuck 2 years ago
Michelle Malkin is quickly becoming a national leader. It wont be long before we see her in DC.
combat1856 2 years ago
Leading the stupid is not a big accomplishment.
y2knoproblem 2 years ago 2
yes a trifecta of leadership...palin, coulter and malkin. hate will return, lies will be their platform, and those who don't buy their ignorance, bigotry and intolerance will be jailed.
wntoply6 2 years ago
Actually, MamoDad, she's simply speaking on behalf of the unheard voice; a voice from those that are ignored in Washington and who are millions of American citizens and taxpayers.
So I ask, MamoDad, who are you to say otherwise?
derwin24 2 years ago
unheard voice? there was a chance to speak out. It's called an election, and the one in 2008 made it pretty clear what the majority wants.
chickenbutt357 2 years ago 2
ah, yes i agree derwin, but that voice is from the fringe right. the same group of birthers who call obama a racist, a socialist and a communist.
while those people should have a voice and be heard, they should also be ignorned as the nut ball "christian"republican haters they really are. after all, they did lose the election. the majority spoke telling them their policies sans ideas, are useless.
are you one of em?
wntoply6 2 years ago 2
Hey derwin24, where was that unheard voice when Bush bailed out AIG for $87 billion, Wall Street for $700 billion, & the automakers(some of whom still declared bankruptcy) for $17.4 billion? Oh, that's right. It wasn't Socialism, Communism, fascism, or Marxism then. But now it IS? It never was. It's called baseless fearmongering
The fringe far far right has the GOP now, & it's bad. I feel bad for normal conservative Republicans. The "Tea-baggers" & "birthers" are at odds with them...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow
Fail.
The congress, comprised mostly of democrats during these decisions, voted FOR AIG bailout, Wall Street, automakers.
How is that about Bush?
GreatSatan1 2 years ago
Bush created the legislation for those three pieces I just listed...
You don't understand facts or history well. Please look it up. Thanks
Besides, if he didn't want it, where was his veto? That's because he created them then pushed them up the congressional chain...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bush did a lot things wrong near the end of his term in office. The last two years especially. I did not agree with his policies or his spending then, and in retrospect I still don't agree with them.
That is not to say, like you would have it, that he could implement these liberal policies alone. Congress jumped at the chance to support these spending bills. Just look at roll call to see for yourself who voted them in.
GreatSatan1 2 years ago
He created the policy. It came from his desk. You're making excuses here. Where was your outrage then?
It simply didn't exist. Now when Obama comes into office with a recession/depression from Bush, his hands are tied economically, yet some incorrectly scream "Socialism". That's Bush's fault. He handed the man a failed economy, & war in two different theaters. I'm not saying Obama can't make mistakes. In fact he has, & will make more, but consider the real circumstances here...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow- just a point of fact here.. and this will help you in 7th grade Social Studies... All spending Bills start in the House. The President does not create any bills. After a bill is passed by the House and Senate, the President can then sign it into law. The President can influence the bills, but he cannot introduce them. At least that is how it works in the USA.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
"just a point of fact here...All spending Bills start in the House". Holy shit, you wouldn't recognize a fact if it fucked you, then you had fact babies...
"The law requires that, by the first Monday in February, the President submit to Congress his proposed Federal budget for the next fiscal year, which begins October 1."
You're so used to lying, you don't even understand the most basic facts in our government.
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow - maybe Egnlish isn't your mother language, but there is a difference between what the President does by submitting a proposed budget and what the legislative houses do by actually creating real bills.
You foul mouth is just a sign of your intellectual emptiness.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Bolgernow- I don't know where you were, but there was plenty of right wingers yelling about the Bush bailouts. The basic idea they have is that the gov't should not take peoples money to bail out any business. The difference with what is happening now is just the size of the bailouts. Fearmongering? It does not seem that labelling something should cause any fear. But, if you area afraid of the word 'Socialist' that is your issue.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
I was here. Where were the "tea parties" then?
No where...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow - the Conservatives tend not to demonstrate against everything. It took a few times of the gov't taking their money and redistributing it to big business before they got riled enough to demonstrate. But, if you knew how to read, you would have noticed that there where many conservatives speaking against the Bush spending.
Socialism is a form of gov't where individual liberties are superseded by the needs of the masses. Why does this scare you?
dancerdog3 2 years ago
You do not even understand the definition of Socialism. It's an economic system distinct from capitalism. We are still, & always will be a Capitalistic society. Socialism is where the government owns/operates/controls all production/profit/overhead in making clothes, food, homes, phones, coffee, TV's, Newspapers, & any free market product one could consume. That's not the case. According to your logic the Post Office, Army, & FDIC are ALL Socialist since they're run by the government. Nope
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow - Socialism also includes gov't provided education, welfare, regulation of communication. In many ways the US is Socialist. I just don't understand why you are scared by that. Giving something a proper label is a way of helping define and understand. It seems that you want to promote a Socialist agenda, but be free of any definitions or labels. Is it because you are ashamed of your idiology?
dancerdog3 2 years ago
I am pointing out how insane your claim is. According to YOUR definition of Socialism, not the dictionary's, our Post Office, Army, & FDIC are all socialist. How come you're not protesting those? Because that's simply not the case. There are things the government does pretty well & we are happy to have them do it. We're a capitalistic society, always will be. You are fear mongering for neo-con partisan political reasons. You sound obtuse...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow - it is not 'my' definition of Socialism. It is from "Das Kapital" by Karl Marx. According to Marxian idiology, yes, those things are part of a Socialist society. We are truly a mixure of Capitalism and Socialism. We are not and never have been a 'pure' capitalist society.
You still have not explained why you fear the label "Socialist." It is just a description for some of the ways the gov't works. You support these, so why do you fear being defined?
dancerdog3 2 years ago
How can you stand for this? Shouldn't we outlaw the post office? The Army? FDIC? Why does our government have anything to do with these free market ideas? Yet, I'm not hearing that. You should be protesting banks, mail, or our soldier's in uniform. They're taking your freedom away...
You're incorrectly labeling something & I'm calling you out. It'd be like calling an XXXL shirt a parachute. That's the entire point.
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow - you seem to be mixing up somebody else's comments with mine. I guess that is what smoking crack will do...
I will make my point again, in a very simple way, so that even a nine year old can understand:
Socialism is a term that describes in some way what the gov't is doing. You support this. But - and here is my point - Why are you so fearful of the word "SOCIALISM"?
You seem to be humiliated by your own idiology. Why?
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Not confusing any comment ;) AGAIN, Socialism is where EVERY durable good, service, or product is owned/operated/created by the government. Are we Cuba? No. Does the government own the GAP, Starbucks, JcPenny, Sunglasses Hut, Pizza Hut, Dell, Apple? No. If they did we would be a SOCIALIST country. We're a capitalistic country with regulated open market products, & some services run by the government. Are government highways socialist? No. The key component to Socialism is Market Socialism.
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow- Socialism is not Communism. When a gov't owns the means of product for an industry... like cars... that is something that can be considered Socialism. Or when the gov't controls all Health Care. Or when the gov't owns Banks. This is Socialistic.
Why are you afraid of that word? If you beleive our gov't should do these things, then you should be proud of it.
It is not 'fearmongering' to use the word Socialism. If you are afraid of it, then don't support it.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
What? If you feel Medicare, the Army, the Post Office, control of federal highways, FDIC are socialist why aren't you protesting against & labeling them as hard as you do Obama?
That makes no logical sense. You're picking & choosing your "socialism label outrage". That's silly...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow- I am not protesting Obama! All I did was point out that your comment about there being no opposition to Bush's actions was false. You made a statement that had no basis in reality. On top of that, you support Socialist ideas and at the same time anhore the name "Socialist."
You need to stop lying and stand up for your idiology. If you want gov't control of Health Care, Car building, Banking... then good for you. But, be a man and stand up for your beleifs.
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Incorrect. You do. You said, "The difference with what is happening NOW is just the size of the bailouts". That's speaking to this administration specifically...
"Idiology"? You have labeled me without knowing my views. If you can not resolve the massive problem in your position that "the government bailouts now are now Socialist" without raising a SINGLE issue over Bush's, or current governments control of the Army, the Post Office, federal highways being Socialist. You make no sense...
Bolgernow 2 years ago
Bolgernow- I think you are now arguing my point. There was plenty of criticism of the Bush bailouts. And now there is even more of Obama's bailouts. The amount of the bailout keeps getting higher and that seems to get people a bit more riled. So, it appears that you now agree with what I have been saying.
If you want to label the Army, the Post Office, federal highways as being Socialist, that is fine with me. I would probably disagree with the Army part, but if it makes you feel good...
dancerdog3 2 years ago
Not remotely. You're a neo-con spam account. Bolgernow is my boyfriend. He was just "blocked" here because he called you out as a neo-con troll. You're weak, lie, spin, & attack others. You have no facts to support your claims.
KitWonders 2 years ago
KitWonders- you are funny! Does your mommy know you are using her YouTube account to post comments?
dancerdog3 2 years ago
KitWonders
I thought so. Are you the "Bull" or the "femme"?
GreatSatan1 2 years ago
Malkin is a stupid, ignorant, hypocritical dumbass.
MamoDad 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Michelle Malkin, you rock!
derwin24 2 years ago
She is a political prostitute just like your mom.
stewart0312 2 years ago
like a true "christian"republican derwin, you make a statement, but you give absolutely nothing to back it up.
wntoply6 2 years ago