@ResiusOnline Well but the Patriots are not able to take down russian ICBM's. There can be 10.000 Patriots but none of them will take out a RS-24 or RS-36M, thats the point.
i've seen first hand....the miss fires, and the missile missing its target. PATRIOT is garbage. We spend more time trying to fix it (especially the radar) than anything else. When it does hit its targets.....they are 'friendly's'. Our gov is just wasting money keeping this system around.....
так что короче такой сценарий никому не подходит и пендосам тоже все люди все жить хотят поэтому это не более чем маскарад , ну вот не доверяют они нашим средствам про и все , бабло на этом делают как обычно
какой смысл от этих пэтриота эта система в случае войны элементарно подавляется другими ракетами и ввс))) ,а тут уже вступает в игру сатана и прощай мир
короче надо минусы на видео ставить ,пускай европейцы по чести если хотят размещают свои ракеты против нас а не Американские бесит ну ,что эти пендрсы лезут то все на чежой континент
Hey can somone tell me roughly how many missiles, vehicles are there in a SAM Battery. Also how many Batteries are there in a single Firing Unit? Does a few+ missiles, its radar etc make up one Battery?
@m0r0zko Кому от этого хуже... их и так все ненавидят. Так ложью прикрываются, а если начнут, то уже не оправдаются. Европа не особо желает воевать, а Азия только и мечтает заселить США.
The Patriot has been tested thoroughly by Raytheon, as well as our soldiers in combat situations. To say that the Patriot is "reckless, and unpredictable" only tells me that you didn't serve in an ADA unit. And if you did, I'm ashamed to know that an Air Defender doesn't have faith in their equipment. The U.S. has the best air defense systems in the world. Period.
@jsgraham67 On April 7, 1992 Theodore Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Reuven Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testified before a House Committee stating that, according to their independent analysis of video tapes, the Patriot system had a success rate of below 10%, and perhaps even a zero success rate.
There are the PAC2 that they have in germany and they are proximity missiles and two are shot at a time... but what they have in korea and texas (at least when i was a 14t) are called PAC3 and they are freakin awesome dead on missiles. as for the 14e down there.... yeah i would hate life if i were a 14e too! you get to sit in a box and get yelled at all day.
i just enlisted at a 14T and im not gonna lie from what i hear im pretty much regretting it. all i hear is that 14T do nothing but watch over equipment and drive trucks. if anyone has any opinions about that mos id love to hear them. i dont leave for basic till march so maybe i could still switch..
Im so sorry man.. Im a 14E for the past 3 years and im telling you man.. this is the worst sh@it ever.. Thank God I Reclass to another job.. by the way try not to come over 5/7 ADA Germany you will regret it bad.. believe me..
Well you have to consider that fact that the patriot missile is subjected to many test and official reviews. This has produce a very accurate results to it's effectiveness and failures. Though however many missiles out there would say that it's the best in the world but then again have no private and official reviews and extensive test that is open to the public. There's no missile out there than can guarantee a perfect effectiveness, not even the most advance ballistic missile.
@ChuckManiac yeah but still... i heard this patriot missile had a positive result on incomming iraqi skuds durrin 91 gulf war less then 10% of the time...
Well, there's no missile defense that is 100% effective. This is why in the protocol to have to shoot down a single missile several times if needed to make sure it's eliminated. When you take that into account, the missile defense would not be 100% accurate. Sure the Patriot could have been better during the War but then again that was the best they could have on that time. The program has then upgraded the systems and achieves better results with tests.
@ChuckManiac well... why do u think the us millitary is spending so much on electronic and lazer soft kill measures instead of traditional hard kill measures like the patriot... its because these patriots are expensive, reckless and unpredictable...
The reason america fails to deliver innovative design is that science of balistics is too mathematical which requires very few devoted scientists, instead america employs 1000's of
less experienced scientists working on small
fractional projects each, (the whole picture can't be seen by a single person...)
The reason why the Patriot has only 50km range is that it is designed for theatre defense. Most of the nation that aquired this missile either have longer range missile defense and or have anti aircraft/missile ships on their coastal border. Take the US for example, it doesn't have a missile that can take 500km target but then again enemy aircraft and missile will have a very hard time penetrating their border.
Patriots are only available for mobile and ground platform. The naval sector will not be allowed to accept it as there's already missiles that they used and also part of the contract from the company that builds it.
HOOOOAH! I was in that unit, albeit in 1993-1995 based in Hanau formerly from Bitburg. I believe Friedburg was one of the places we would have our "field problems". I remember it being so muddy there that one of our launchers started to slide. The outriggers would sink, then slide! Loads of "fun"!
@chaghar And the Death Star is better than S-400. Who gives a damn? S-300/S-400 are the worst systems when it comes to reliability. If you talk about the best anti-aircraft missiles... that's IRIS-T SL. The next generation anti-ballistic systems will be laser-based.
Im 14 echo patriot fire control enhanced operator maintainer, so i know what im talking about, the failure only took place in the 90s now the success rate is very high, the usa would not spend that much money on this equipment if it did not work...dumbfucks.
and i can sort of concur with you and take it from me i was a 16TH30 (instructor), and a desert storm vet and we were rushed into a situation that the original PAC-1 missile was not designed for and the PAC-2 were months away. We actually had a higher percentage rate than published but it was the fact that the SCUD broke up in to several pieces and we were only allowed to engage with one missile during most attacks (political war? most definitely) and so if we hit the war head we were lucky.
I have news for you...to an extent, it does. No system is perfect, but it defended Isreal against Scud missiles in the First Gulf War. Of course, missiles did get through the system, but the Patriot did help counter the threat.
So why did Theodore Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Reuven Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testify before a House Committee that, according to their independent analyses, the Patriot system had a success rate of below 10%, and perhaps even a zero success rate? Clearly you are on of the suckers I eluded to earlier.
Are you certain that you are keeping success rate and accuracy straight? In the persian gulf, for example, an average of four Patriots were fired per hostile missile. If every missile was destroyed (which did not happen), the SUCCESS RATE would be 100%. The ACCURACY would be a mere 25%. And because less than 100% of missiles engaged were shot down, the Patriot has an accuracy of less than 25%; probably much less.
That success rate is from the first gulf war in the early 90's. The system was not designed to intercept ballistic missiles at that time. It was designed to shoot aircraft. With the PAC-3 upgrade, the success rate is extremely higher. In Operation Iraqi Freedom, PATRIOT shot 9 out of 9 Tactical Ballistic Missiles that were fired. You can't get much better than 100%
the Patriot doesn't have the highest success rate, but with the number of launchers on site there if a incoming target was in doubt of being hit it wouldn't be difficult to fire multiple shots in quick succession
@CalleUnion Don't know where you got your info, but I worked on the Patriot systems and the only accuracy they possess is their ability to work their way through the bullshit proproganda about them. They're high maintenance pieces of fucking shit. The Scuds are garbage and would break up during their high trajectory before the Patriots even got to them. Then again, what would I know about a system I actually worked on because you're a patriotic american and know everything about everything.
@tyme4mike hmm, unless you're a 3rd shop you don't know the system as well as I do, although you're correct on the system being a high maintenance piece of shit, it is still very accurate and the only thing that tops it off is MEADs (I think that's how it is spelled) but is not proven capable yet. I would love to get into a discussion with you but I am done and have no time for a measly 24T or 14T or 14E or 140E or 14A or whatever your job was while you were in the military. Good day.
It may have a low sucsess rate but im pretty sure what ever country you live in the USA is protecting you with that sytem. but thats not the only thing that protects from nukes and missiles. its a sytem i dont know how the system works.
Heard Patriot was not 100% success.
karthikbans 6 months ago
Don't like American-made weapons
KatiushaVN4 7 months ago
For Russians this shit is a toy. xD
MelRob29 8 months ago
ready to hit the buton LMAO ull never hit the button
jennroxursox08 11 months ago
Who gives a shit what the S-400 can do?
Number of S-400s in Russian service = 16
Number of Patriots in American service = 1106
And THAT, is why I don't give a shit what the S-400 can do.
ResiusOnline 1 year ago
@ResiusOnline Well but the Patriots are not able to take down russian ICBM's. There can be 10.000 Patriots but none of them will take out a RS-24 or RS-36M, thats the point.
SovjetPhoenix 7 months ago
Comment removed
baudrik787 1 year ago
FAIL - it's a cold war weapon, and it was first used in 1991, and against the Iraqis...
Jocks0113 1 year ago
@Jocks0113 First used to destroy a MISSILE which was never its intended purpose. It was meant to shoot down aircraft.
RyanXWing 1 year ago
@RyanXWing perhaps you are right.
Jocks0113 1 year ago
and again useless piece of shit
bouzinsale 1 year ago
@bouzinsale and again your'e a worthless piece of shit.
baudrik787 1 year ago
NATO RULES FOREVER
88ABRAMS88 1 year ago
14T was a shitty mos
Epic410 1 year ago
i've seen first hand....the miss fires, and the missile missing its target. PATRIOT is garbage. We spend more time trying to fix it (especially the radar) than anything else. When it does hit its targets.....they are 'friendly's'. Our gov is just wasting money keeping this system around.....
djcrashtest2000 1 year ago
так что короче такой сценарий никому не подходит и пендосам тоже все люди все жить хотят поэтому это не более чем маскарад , ну вот не доверяют они нашим средствам про и все , бабло на этом делают как обычно
m0r0zko 1 year ago
какой смысл от этих пэтриота эта система в случае войны элементарно подавляется другими ракетами и ввс))) ,а тут уже вступает в игру сатана и прощай мир
m0r0zko 1 year ago
короче надо минусы на видео ставить ,пускай европейцы по чести если хотят размещают свои ракеты против нас а не Американские бесит ну ,что эти пендрсы лезут то все на чежой континент
m0r0zko 1 year ago
Эта штука стреляет? или просто покрасить вынесли... показали бы
mphet26 1 year ago
Shit ill take a Pac-3 over an over-hyped S-400 any day. A combat proven system.....or a system that is only hyped about with no combat experience?
We saw what happened when Russian's hyped their machines before.
The T series tanks.
MiG-21
MiG-15
MiG-29
What do these all have in common? They all got raped by U.S. airplanes and tanks. You can't trust shit the Russian's say.
DESX312 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey can somone tell me roughly how many missiles, vehicles are there in a SAM Battery. Also how many Batteries are there in a single Firing Unit? Does a few+ missiles, its radar etc make up one Battery?
TuAFFalcon 1 year ago
надеюсь у американцев хватит мозгов что бы не развязывать 3 мировую войну
m0r0zko 1 year ago
@m0r0zko Кому от этого хуже... их и так все ненавидят. Так ложью прикрываются, а если начнут, то уже не оправдаются. Европа не особо желает воевать, а Азия только и мечтает заселить США.
mphet26 1 year ago
@mphet26 и Россию тоже ) ,у нас очень маленькая плотность населения ,кто знает как все будет на самом деле )) в целом согласен с тобой
m0r0zko 1 year ago
The Patriot has been tested thoroughly by Raytheon, as well as our soldiers in combat situations. To say that the Patriot is "reckless, and unpredictable" only tells me that you didn't serve in an ADA unit. And if you did, I'm ashamed to know that an Air Defender doesn't have faith in their equipment. The U.S. has the best air defense systems in the world. Period.
jsgraham67 1 year ago
@jsgraham67 On April 7, 1992 Theodore Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Reuven Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testified before a House Committee stating that, according to their independent analysis of video tapes, the Patriot system had a success rate of below 10%, and perhaps even a zero success rate.
OOjiBoy 1 year ago
usa sprid like cancer all over the world and calim power attcking small country harmless like iraq
romeoof 2 years ago
I was in Hanau with 2/43 way back in the day and comments about its accuracy back in the gulf war compared to now are in a word - silly
Agnostika1 2 years ago
in poland they also got 4 of that batteries
PolskaUrban 2 years ago
I DONT LIKE SO HUGE ROKET LOUNCH SYSTEMS....... the sa13 gopher by russia is fast and has his own radar system like TOR.....
the mlrs is the us way of it and i like them more than so big systems
AuszucktesGfrast 2 years ago
There are the PAC2 that they have in germany and they are proximity missiles and two are shot at a time... but what they have in korea and texas (at least when i was a 14t) are called PAC3 and they are freakin awesome dead on missiles. as for the 14e down there.... yeah i would hate life if i were a 14e too! you get to sit in a box and get yelled at all day.
hotbooinva85 2 years ago
Is the pac-1 and pac-2 still in service with the u.s. army.
N1cholas240 2 years ago
Patriot is bad Missile
s-400 is the best
S3odiGold 2 years ago
Its record it awesome.....
ClarksonsinUSA 2 years ago
@S3odiGold S-400 and Patriot sucks, V2 Rocket is the best
NoShame86 2 years ago
haha im in a patriot unit, 14t are pretty much the bitches of patriot
idieforamerica 2 years ago
i just enlisted at a 14T and im not gonna lie from what i hear im pretty much regretting it. all i hear is that 14T do nothing but watch over equipment and drive trucks. if anyone has any opinions about that mos id love to hear them. i dont leave for basic till march so maybe i could still switch..
lynnxlafetish 2 years ago
Im so sorry man.. Im a 14E for the past 3 years and im telling you man.. this is the worst sh@it ever.. Thank God I Reclass to another job.. by the way try not to come over 5/7 ADA Germany you will regret it bad.. believe me..
ivancito59 2 years ago
Well you have to consider that fact that the patriot missile is subjected to many test and official reviews. This has produce a very accurate results to it's effectiveness and failures. Though however many missiles out there would say that it's the best in the world but then again have no private and official reviews and extensive test that is open to the public. There's no missile out there than can guarantee a perfect effectiveness, not even the most advance ballistic missile.
ChuckManiac 2 years ago
@ChuckManiac yeah but still... i heard this patriot missile had a positive result on incomming iraqi skuds durrin 91 gulf war less then 10% of the time...
101andrewj 1 year ago
@101andrewj
Well, there's no missile defense that is 100% effective. This is why in the protocol to have to shoot down a single missile several times if needed to make sure it's eliminated. When you take that into account, the missile defense would not be 100% accurate. Sure the Patriot could have been better during the War but then again that was the best they could have on that time. The program has then upgraded the systems and achieves better results with tests.
ChuckManiac 1 year ago
@ChuckManiac well... why do u think the us millitary is spending so much on electronic and lazer soft kill measures instead of traditional hard kill measures like the patriot... its because these patriots are expensive, reckless and unpredictable...
101andrewj 1 year ago
The reason america fails to deliver innovative design is that science of balistics is too mathematical which requires very few devoted scientists, instead america employs 1000's of
less experienced scientists working on small
fractional projects each, (the whole picture can't be seen by a single person...)
Innovation and problem solving comes from
a single person! Russia employs very few
people
VERGIS92 2 years ago
The Patriot have been used several times in war and it has been effective to say the least.
Vlaudeimirz 2 years ago
The first version of patriot was utter failure and failed tests, then Siemens and its subcontractors
fixed its electronics in my country, (Euro10M for
improving the electronics alone)
the Patriot system has failed american technology,
Russian and French missiles are the best!
No wonder Bush missile shield also failed
catastrophically and is still on drawing table
VERGIS92 2 years ago
Brazil...
luisx1976 2 years ago
Russian S-400 the best))patriot-50 km..
S-400-500 km...
BLINDONALTS 2 years ago
The reason why the Patriot has only 50km range is that it is designed for theatre defense. Most of the nation that aquired this missile either have longer range missile defense and or have anti aircraft/missile ships on their coastal border. Take the US for example, it doesn't have a missile that can take 500km target but then again enemy aircraft and missile will have a very hard time penetrating their border.
Vlaudeimirz 2 years ago
can patrios be integrated on warships? Why do they use sea-sparrows on ships rather than pac3 system?
kubruk 2 years ago
Patriots are only available for mobile and ground platform. The naval sector will not be allowed to accept it as there's already missiles that they used and also part of the contract from the company that builds it.
ChuckManiac 2 years ago
This «Patriot» stupid shit !!! S-400 «Triumph» The Best
xxPalacHxx 2 years ago
This full shit. Topol - M out of competition
88Templier 2 years ago
We know. The topol can't compare in any respect.
ccr5cxcr4 2 years ago
Comment removed
88Templier 2 years ago
HOOOOAH! I was in that unit, albeit in 1993-1995 based in Hanau formerly from Bitburg. I believe Friedburg was one of the places we would have our "field problems". I remember it being so muddy there that one of our launchers started to slide. The outriggers would sink, then slide! Loads of "fun"!
patriotpride16t 2 years ago
misil S 300 made in Russia
nuphi 2 years ago
usa is number one , china and russia are shits
vanhung1087 2 years ago
I dont have anything against you but that is a little weird coming from a Vietnamese guy.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
lol yes.... and literally all countries copied our digi camo
cavegoat13 2 years ago
no actually we copied ours from canada's.....
mmafan1775 2 years ago
cool they still have wehrmacht helmets!:P
hendrikhelweg 3 years ago
these soldiers are American!
gus23a 2 years ago
in germany :D at the US bases
95predator 2 years ago
HIMAD don't have jack on SHORAD! 14S, 14R, 14J (those cats are neutral!)
hynroc69 3 years ago
You know the saying, if it was simple, we would call it SHORAD....
Also, Department of the Army has changed your acronym to SHOMAD....Sho Mad U don't have a job anymore!
teamhess 3 years ago
s-400 is better than patriot.
chaghar 3 years ago 20
doesnt matter when a stealth fighter launches a HARM 60 miles away and backs out. (yes i know that the s400 range is over 150 miles)
RUSSIAisPRIMITIV 3 years ago
over 270 miles and the speed is 3 miles per second.
chaghar 3 years ago
4 EA6B Prowlers jam radar,
The SAM fires a volley of 3-4 missles
they whiz by with no radar lock,
The Prowlers Launch HARMS,
the Missle crews go nuts
they shut off the radar hoping the HARMS lose lock
but the harm activley remembers the source of the singnal, the radar(s) is destroyed, then the clean up begins, IE dropping JDAMS etc.
If you have an EA6 in the Sky, you have a major atvantage. 4 Prwolers can jam the area of france, and 7-14 frequincies each
RUSSIAisPRIMITIV 3 years ago
chaghar - 3 miles per second? Mach 10? Liar. Fakel Machine Building Design Bureau states max speed is mach 5. Which is about 1.5 miles per second.
Max speed of incoming target = mach 14.5.
So when you get done with your bullshit, you can try again. Max range = 250 miles. Evaluated as "optimistic in the extreme" by global security.
HumanShot 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah fucking right
draadstaal33 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chaghar s-300 is better than patriot.!!!!
tatarin789 1 year ago
@chaghar Patriot is good but the S-400 is better and price is better too.
tramvaj12 1 year ago
@chaghar And the Death Star is better than S-400. Who gives a damn? S-300/S-400 are the worst systems when it comes to reliability. If you talk about the best anti-aircraft missiles... that's IRIS-T SL. The next generation anti-ballistic systems will be laser-based.
hallabalooza 1 year ago
@chaghar Proof please? Battle records please? None? Thought so.
mistamikey123455 10 months ago 2
@mistamikey123455 battle records is when 80 scuds hit saudi arabia because your dumb patriots were hitting the fuel tanks instead of the warhead.
chaghar 10 months ago
@chaghar I meant battle record of the S-400.
Why so aggressive? Who said I am American?
mistamikey123455 10 months ago
@mistamikey123455 idiot
Timurchin1 6 months ago
@Timurchin1 Look who's talking. Dumbass.
mistamikey123455 6 months ago
@mistamikey123455 put your patriots in your ass and fire it
Timurchin1 6 months ago
@Timurchin1 Classical argument of an ignorant.
mistamikey123455 5 months ago
Im 14 echo patriot fire control enhanced operator maintainer, so i know what im talking about, the failure only took place in the 90s now the success rate is very high, the usa would not spend that much money on this equipment if it did not work...dumbfucks.
Amnesiac882 3 years ago
and i can sort of concur with you and take it from me i was a 16TH30 (instructor), and a desert storm vet and we were rushed into a situation that the original PAC-1 missile was not designed for and the PAC-2 were months away. We actually had a higher percentage rate than published but it was the fact that the SCUD broke up in to several pieces and we were only allowed to engage with one missile during most attacks (political war? most definitely) and so if we hit the war head we were lucky.
cormac1970 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why does germany like taste of US dick so much?
monobrowperson 3 years ago
*alluded
DavidWalker12 3 years ago
LOL at 'missile interceptors'. We have to remember though that there are suckers out there that actually believe this technology works!
DavidWalker12 3 years ago
I have news for you...to an extent, it does. No system is perfect, but it defended Isreal against Scud missiles in the First Gulf War. Of course, missiles did get through the system, but the Patriot did help counter the threat.
WashDCDemocrat 3 years ago
So why did Theodore Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Reuven Pedatzur of Tel Aviv University testify before a House Committee that, according to their independent analyses, the Patriot system had a success rate of below 10%, and perhaps even a zero success rate? Clearly you are on of the suckers I eluded to earlier.
DavidWalker12 3 years ago
Are you certain that you are keeping success rate and accuracy straight? In the persian gulf, for example, an average of four Patriots were fired per hostile missile. If every missile was destroyed (which did not happen), the SUCCESS RATE would be 100%. The ACCURACY would be a mere 25%. And because less than 100% of missiles engaged were shot down, the Patriot has an accuracy of less than 25%; probably much less.
WashDCDemocrat 3 years ago
That success rate is from the first gulf war in the early 90's. The system was not designed to intercept ballistic missiles at that time. It was designed to shoot aircraft. With the PAC-3 upgrade, the success rate is extremely higher. In Operation Iraqi Freedom, PATRIOT shot 9 out of 9 Tactical Ballistic Missiles that were fired. You can't get much better than 100%
jsking13 3 years ago
the Patriot doesn't have the highest success rate, but with the number of launchers on site there if a incoming target was in doubt of being hit it wouldn't be difficult to fire multiple shots in quick succession
FLOTGhostOp 3 years ago
Freeburg?
Its pronounced FRY-BURG i believe
DFPeedOn 3 years ago
Frieburg.
patriotpride16t 2 years ago
look at triumph
13oy4Girls 3 years ago
germany llooool those are Americans toys
SunnyboyEVOLUTION 3 years ago
Yeah its the GREAT USA toys
Dono233 3 years ago
awesome! but italian's samp/t are better then German's patriot. However, i love yours PzH 2000!
acterHeli 3 years ago
lollllll! get a Sam
NoMatch2Me 3 years ago
I hope US got a lot of Patriot missiles since it has a low hit rate (20% success)...
SgtDrDeath 4 years ago
Not true...
chrslbrt 3 years ago
PATRIOT is actually deadly accurate, ask the british, 2 of their planes were taken down with 2 missiles on mistake (oops)
CalleUnion 3 years ago 14
Why did you reply to me. I was correcting him because he said it has a low hit rate?
chrslbrt 3 years ago
it replies automatically to the last msg, sorry not my fault.
CalleUnion 3 years ago
oh.... My bad.
chrslbrt 3 years ago
@CalleUnion Don't know where you got your info, but I worked on the Patriot systems and the only accuracy they possess is their ability to work their way through the bullshit proproganda about them. They're high maintenance pieces of fucking shit. The Scuds are garbage and would break up during their high trajectory before the Patriots even got to them. Then again, what would I know about a system I actually worked on because you're a patriotic american and know everything about everything.
tyme4mike 1 year ago
@tyme4mike hmm, unless you're a 3rd shop you don't know the system as well as I do, although you're correct on the system being a high maintenance piece of shit, it is still very accurate and the only thing that tops it off is MEADs (I think that's how it is spelled) but is not proven capable yet. I would love to get into a discussion with you but I am done and have no time for a measly 24T or 14T or 14E or 140E or 14A or whatever your job was while you were in the military. Good day.
CalleUnion 1 year ago
@CalleUnion its good i know, its a patriot, its a mach 6 huge ass missile like the s - 300, best SAM's in the world.
minerofblood 1 year ago
@CalleUnion Thats because patriot missiles auto fire when they detect an unidentified target on an attack vector.
RyanXWing 1 year ago
It may have a low sucsess rate but im pretty sure what ever country you live in the USA is protecting you with that sytem. but thats not the only thing that protects from nukes and missiles. its a sytem i dont know how the system works.
Dono233 3 years ago
then u americans should do some adjustment or u dont know what youre saying ...
sucess against training dummies/planes is around 90% - against missiles its worse though ...
milbe85 3 years ago
Nice video, good job.
gotfiredagain 4 years ago