Nope! Dont believe it.He was seen the day before,following that women around.And being you wear your cloths all day long! All you have to do is see her once for a sec.No magic,No mind reading,No future telling,Nope,None,Never was,Never will.But the coolest thing about it is there are people that really believe it!
@mastery910 no you don't. i just tried myself.derren is demonstrating how averages work. if you flip a coin 10 times you might get 10 heads and 0 tails. if you use a larger sample, the distribution should be dead even. in this video they don't use a very large sample, but they find out that the average estimate is correct, and that one was closer to the average than the others.
@isakdick Nooo. He's saying that the average of the numbers they guessed is the actual answer, literally, did the math, the average is something else. Your name, you're a dick.
@mastery910 i did the average myself, and i'm telling you derren brown is right. the girl with the calculator is adding up the numbers he tells her and dividing by 21. i read your post and tried myself, and i got the same answer derren did. either you don't know how to calculate an average or you typed in something wrong. those numbers added up do not give you 3382... try again.
136 is wrong, I guessed 209, just on one side there are roughly 70 of them on just the visable side. (check at 1:55 if u want), cylinder shape, 14 around 10 in height would mean 140 on the outer side. It's roughly 6 from side to side. With plain mathmatics it would land on roughly 280. However my assumption has been in numeric favour so let's take away 10% as spill toll, also there are more balls on the right than on the left side meaning minus another 10%, landing it on ~227.
I thought I am gonna do the maths and come up a with a very close number too ... however, I did not. I mean, you can't know the size of the balls, or anything else from a video... not correctly... there are things in our world with which you just have to live and not count them over and over again ...
Clever Trick. Derren subtly suggests the numbers to each person without them knowing. They then "guess" that number. This way he has control over who picks the right number and what the total of all numbers will be. Basic Psychological Suggestion.
Concerning what he knew about the girl, all he had to do was write down all that information (i.e. Silver Jewelry, Bright Shoes, etc.) after seeing her and choosing her as the "accurate one". The only real "guess" was that her mother was an accountant
@yitzthegreat I think it'd be pretty hard to suggest 21 different three digit numbers to people all in the same place and seeing the same thing and it isn't necessary. It's happening by itself at least to an extent - a phenomenon called group intelligence.
He must have chosen the girl before-hand thus getting the info of the mother and cat and then suggested the right number to her somehow.
1. The 301s are different - D.B. substituted the original board with a false one, with pre-selected numbers.
2. He placed the scroll inside the jar when removing the lid - he obscured the view of the jar by the board.
3. There must have been an assistant - selected the person who guessed the number closest to the one on the board, prepared the scroll and gave it to the performer. Excess balls could have been removed (or extra added) together with the scroll.
@ermoulis I screened capped them both, they do look the same. Just different angles, at the very least its still the same girls hand writing if they re-did the board.
@ermoulis you are correct, it must be a different board. Compare the distance from the edge on the first board and the distance from the edge in the last one. I know the perspective is different but you can judge by measuring the length of the number to the space ratio. The original has enough space to fit the whole '301' number before the digit '3'. The one at 5:28 has barely enough to fit just one digit.
The '3' has an angular top, attached to the bottom by a sharp corner. The bottom of the '3' is curled around inward. The '0' has a very corner at the top, with the last part of the stroke coming just under the first part of the stroke. The '1' is sans serif. The baseline off the '3' and the '1' are lower than that of the '0'. The top corner of the '0' is slightly higher than the connecting corner of the '3'. The only thing that's different is the perspective of the camera.
Nope! Dont believe it.He was seen the day before,following that women around.And being you wear your cloths all day long! All you have to do is see her once for a sec.No magic,No mind reading,No future telling,Nope,None,Never was,Never will.But the coolest thing about it is there are people that really believe it!
semiLivedj 1 month ago
@5:27 when you see the numbers, do the math yourself add everything up and you'll get 3382... divided by 21 that would be: 161,04...
mastery910 2 months ago
@mastery910 no you don't. i just tried myself.derren is demonstrating how averages work. if you flip a coin 10 times you might get 10 heads and 0 tails. if you use a larger sample, the distribution should be dead even. in this video they don't use a very large sample, but they find out that the average estimate is correct, and that one was closer to the average than the others.
isakdick 2 months ago
@isakdick Nooo. He's saying that the average of the numbers they guessed is the actual answer, literally, did the math, the average is something else. Your name, you're a dick.
mastery910 2 months ago
@mastery910 i did the average myself, and i'm telling you derren brown is right. the girl with the calculator is adding up the numbers he tells her and dividing by 21. i read your post and tried myself, and i got the same answer derren did. either you don't know how to calculate an average or you typed in something wrong. those numbers added up do not give you 3382... try again.
isakdick 2 months ago
obviously there's an accomplice who switches the card, notice how you only see 301 in the beginning but no other numbers until the end.
Hconn66 2 months ago
136 is wrong, I guessed 209, just on one side there are roughly 70 of them on just the visable side. (check at 1:55 if u want), cylinder shape, 14 around 10 in height would mean 140 on the outer side. It's roughly 6 from side to side. With plain mathmatics it would land on roughly 280. However my assumption has been in numeric favour so let's take away 10% as spill toll, also there are more balls on the right than on the left side meaning minus another 10%, landing it on ~227.
AnnabelLolita 3 months ago
@AnnabelLolita
I thought I am gonna do the maths and come up a with a very close number too ... however, I did not. I mean, you can't know the size of the balls, or anything else from a video... not correctly... there are things in our world with which you just have to live and not count them over and over again ...
Xado147 1 month ago
1:35 and 5:26 look at the first number which is 301.
AtheistView 3 months ago
Hahaaaaaaaa!!!!1 I guessed 132. I'm a fucking champion. Suck my cock, Derren Brown.
geragna 3 months ago
Clever Trick. Derren subtly suggests the numbers to each person without them knowing. They then "guess" that number. This way he has control over who picks the right number and what the total of all numbers will be. Basic Psychological Suggestion.
Concerning what he knew about the girl, all he had to do was write down all that information (i.e. Silver Jewelry, Bright Shoes, etc.) after seeing her and choosing her as the "accurate one". The only real "guess" was that her mother was an accountant
yitzthegreat 5 months ago
@yitzthegreat I think it'd be pretty hard to suggest 21 different three digit numbers to people all in the same place and seeing the same thing and it isn't necessary. It's happening by itself at least to an extent - a phenomenon called group intelligence.
He must have chosen the girl before-hand thus getting the info of the mother and cat and then suggested the right number to her somehow.
Ravain 4 months ago
The Price is Right????
jasonrgrullon2015 5 months ago
1. The 301s are different - D.B. substituted the original board with a false one, with pre-selected numbers.
2. He placed the scroll inside the jar when removing the lid - he obscured the view of the jar by the board.
3. There must have been an assistant - selected the person who guessed the number closest to the one on the board, prepared the scroll and gave it to the performer. Excess balls could have been removed (or extra added) together with the scroll.
aleksakania 6 months ago
did anyone notice he said 'a wunch of bankers'..... :)
damakdadyman 8 months ago 46
@damakdadyman Bunch of wankers maybe
erock195 6 months ago
@erock195 that was the whole point of what i said.....he purposefully called them a wunch of bankers
damakdadyman 6 months ago
Comment removed
vickiho 5 months ago
@damakdadyman lol switch the b and w ....bunch of wankers lol
mopryIScool 3 months ago
Comment removed
mymom1234 1 year ago
The 301 that wrote the girl at the start is not the same with the 301 in the board that took derren at the end...
ermoulis 1 year ago 6
@ermoulis thanks for the heads up, Captain Obvious.
saxojon 1 year ago
@ermoulis I screened capped them both, they do look the same. Just different angles, at the very least its still the same girls hand writing if they re-did the board.
brono25 1 year ago
@brono25 yeah same writing the 0 doesnt sit as high as the 3 and the bottom of the 3 curves up the same amount... its clearly the same lol
joakerowns 1 year ago
@brono25 They do look similar, but the distance from the edge is different.
bArT8472 9 months ago
@ermoulis you are correct, it must be a different board. Compare the distance from the edge on the first board and the distance from the edge in the last one. I know the perspective is different but you can judge by measuring the length of the number to the space ratio. The original has enough space to fit the whole '301' number before the digit '3'. The one at 5:28 has barely enough to fit just one digit.
bArT8472 9 months ago
@ermoulis and he never shows the board back to the people
wtficantgetausername 5 months ago
Comment removed
danielmrussell 3 months ago
Comment removed
danielmrussell 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looks the same to me.
The '3' has an angular top, attached to the bottom by a sharp corner. The bottom of the '3' is curled around inward. The '0' has a very corner at the top, with the last part of the stroke coming just under the first part of the stroke. The '1' is sans serif. The baseline off the '3' and the '1' are lower than that of the '0'. The top corner of the '0' is slightly higher than the connecting corner of the '3'. The only thing that's different is the perspective of the camera.
danielmrussell 3 months ago
@ermoulis Dude he openly admits it's all tricks. Who cares?
yoshiguy123 2 days ago