I told Kirk Cameron that Sarah Palin and I have a common ancestor, back in 1066 at the time of the Norman invasion. He wouldn't believe me. He wouldn't look at the documentary evidence--he refused to believe me unless I could show him a creature that was half Sarah Palin, half me.
I'm always amused by this bizarre idea, considering that creationists obviously believe that all human beings are descended from common ancestors. Presumably Kirk Cameron believes that he and Mohammed Ali have a common ancestor. Does he imagine that that ancestor, that "transitional form" looked like Mohammed Ali from the waist up and Kirk Cameron from the waist down?
Since the late 19th century, it has been generally accepted by palaeontologists, and celebrated in lay reference works, as being the oldest known bird, though some more recent studies have cast doubt on this assessment, finding that it is instead a non-avialan dinosaur closely related to the origin of birds.[1]
Unless things have drastically changed over the past few years, the evidence isn't as "clear" as you make it out to be. Fossil classification simply is a difficult task and one that had very sub-par practices in the past. For example we are discovering that many dinosaur bones which were classified as separate species are really of the same species.
As for human bones, they're very incomplete skeletons and, I quote, "can fit inside the back of a truck". And there's debate on [continued]
@DemiImp And there's debate on which fossils belong to which species. There's a book called "A Short History of Nearly Everything" written a couple years back that goes into quite a bit of detail about this issue. If you're interested in this but don't want to spend the money on the book, you can check out DRCited (youtube channel) has an audiobook of it posted.
Pretty much everything else in this video is pretty darn correct.
05:53 The answer is bad reasoning, at least on definition given on item showed from "wasdarwinrightsite". But first, I think the top is a lie or at least misleading. Lungfish and Crossopterygians are too far from Amphibians. The criterium was maybe badly posed. I would prefer "sufficient closeness between intermediates between widely diverging supposed lineages". ...
@hglundahl ... Second, the supposed intermediates between reptiles and mammals, are we sure they are not really mammals, that they ever had scales and laid eggs? Third, the dishonesty echoes that of some evolutionist arguers I have known when arguing against creation.
But that was the only somewhat relevant part, as the rest of your diatribe was based on ignorance.
We have at least eleven full specimens of Archaeopteryx. None of them are particularly recent, either. In addition, bird evolution is documented by dozens, if not hundreds, of other intermediates between them and theropod dinosaurs.
@TheZooCrew Thank you for answering my question "Or have we any holotypes of it since?" - Now, looking up Theropod, I see it seems to be what is called Ornithopod, as opposed to Sauropod, and my question returns: any proof these creatures are not misshaped birds? I seem again to recall a news story about a common bird, misshapen exemplar, that was born with teeth rather than real beak. My theory is: T Rex was a misshapen very big bird that could not fly. Intermediates between birds and birds? -!
It's going to take a lot of unlearning on your part. For one, you can't just make up "theories" and claim that they supersede science.
Why should you get a free education on biology and taxonomy when the rest of us have to put in years of work to learn this much? How about you go to school rather than post useless YouTube comments.
03:10 two top reptilian features of Archeopteryx Lithographica ("Original-Winged the Stonewritten" in Ancient Greek, but that is just me being geeky), namely minus beak and plus teeth, have been found in misborn birds, in recent news, as far as I recall.
As for other features, how easy are they to verify, if the only one we have is this well known lithoglyph (stone sculpture)? Or have we any holotypes of it since?
00:49 "Creationists accuse us of pure speculation about fossils we DON'T find. But we know there had to be more than thirty of these alive at one time, and we know their population must be multiplied over several generations. We're also pretty sure that all of them had heads." - A set of genetic manipulation freaks might actually be just thirty individuals. And saying scientists of Nod East of Eden (Harappa?) did it, is as valid an explanation as "extinct species". Unless you beg the Q.
That playset didn't look prehistoric to me. You mean to tell me that we had plastics before recorded history? Doesn't that show you that god gave us our full intelligence and there was no transition of growing smarter monkey brains? Where do you come up with your lies?
Your videos helped me destroy in a presentation for one of my education classes. While I was only supposed to present a brief history of evolution in education, I was heavily questioned by a group of creationists during the Q&A about the validity of evolution.
@bestvalue I clarified in the middle of this video that by one definition, there are millions, but that by the most restrictive definition -the one that I cite here- there are only a few hundred species which meet those criteria.
@bestvalue Actually, if you would listen carefully, AronRa does not use the word "forms" at approx. 1:20. He uses the word "examples." There is a difference.
@micheal49 WHAT???!!! He doesn't use the word "forms" OR "examples" but that completely misses the point. He told Bob Enyart he said "hundreds" not millions when he clearly says MILLIONS. He has a habit of misunderstanding Bob and then claiming he is right when Bob is actually right. If it weren't so annoying it would be hilarious.
@pythor2 I DID watch the whole thing. I actually really like AronRa. He's all right (except when he's mostly wrong). His discussions with Bob Enyart will stay on my IPod for years to come. Already listened to them 3 times. It's interesting to see how often they talk past each other. It'd be nice to hear them stay on topic instead of Bob always getting sidetracked and interrupted. I thought it was pretty classy of him to offer an undeserved apology at the end. Good Christian thing to do.
“Every species known in this series was found in roughly sequential order over a 500 million year period according to the fossil record.”
Classic evolutionary circular reasoning that the fossils are found in roughly the order that we presume evolution to have happened thus it is evidence of our presupposition.When it is not, and those that aren’t found in the right order are thusly put in their presupposed place.
2nd evoultionary falsehood. Interpretation based on our presupposition is fact
@TheZooCrew "Blatant lies about the processes of archaeology, paleontology, and taxonomy aren't valid arguments" Is that your best argument? I thought so.
@TheZooCrew Blatant lies? really.. What is the presuppositon of taxonomy? that life evolved correct? thus similar animals are put together to support this presupposition.
When similarity has nothing to do with ancestory but with function.
Yeah that is why all of the branches in the palenotology trees are connected by wishing and not by fossil evidence but by the presumption.
@sonykroket No I can prove that everyone is homophobic by nature.. You are also, thus the username, you are just taught to repress it by a society that has been confused by the perverts as to their nature and why they are the way they are..
@sonykroket Oh so tolerant you are of others ideas and bleifs.. You do know that the very first meeting of the NAZI party was held at a Gay bar don't you? That Hitler was a homo and so was Himler all of Hitlers Henchmen were. The BrownShirts were put together by one of the Homos in the NAZI party and to be a member of the original brown shirts you had to be a homo.. Funny how those who support homos accuse those who oppose them, of being Nazis. Nazi = Gay
@sonykroket A facist puts country ahead of everything.. I don't do that.. So why the intolerance of the truth? You can read the completely documented book online I believe..
Sonykroket are you a gayboy? Is that why you are so offended? Or am I personally slandering you in some way?
@DestroyDogma Yeah but I will resist it.... Just like you.. I have accepted my homophobia and it has been a great thing.. No more lies... ANd I have found others who accept me.. But I still run into the ignorant bigots like you now and again..
@BornHomophobictOO I don't know if you're a troll or not but claiming to be a homophobe you don't really have a leg to stand on calling others bigots.
@YevonZ Bigot... Person intolerantly devoted to their own particular belief or prejudice..
I came out of the closet years ago.. I used to hide my homophobia because people would label me a closeted homo for it. I then realized that they were just bigots and I had to be who I was born to be. Once I accepted my homophobia and embraced it I found out that there were many others around me who were also afraid to be honest and because of bigots we were forced to live a lie.. OUT and Proud..
@BornHomophobictOO So you were hiding your bigotry from other bigots and then became open about your bigotry? You have a dislike/fear/prejudice against homosexuals yet you can point to someone else and call them a bigot,and have some sick sense of pride that you are open about your intolerance. I would call you delusional but I'm still more or less convinced you're a troll.
@BornHomophobictOO You do realize that phobias are not inborn but learned and are UNREASONABLE fears, don't you?
Therefore, you may be born hearing impaired or without arms or with alcohol induced pre-natal trauma or some other sort of injury, but you CANNOT born with phobias.
Also, in a study done by a Georgia university, homophobic men had a stronger sexual response to gay porn than did men who were not homophobic.
I can tell what you're hiding by the way you hide it.
@sonykroket I has been suggested that the reason so many people think that homosexuality is a choice is because they themselves MADE that choice and their homophobia stems from resentment and repressed desire. They chose to be straight due to societal pressure instead of allowing their natural tendencies to manifest.
I don't know about you, but if I had to repress my natural sexual tendencies to conform to the rules of a church, I'd be pretty angry and shitty too.
Homophobia is actually the phycological state that a closeted homo has (which is evidence of thier regressive disorder and the grandiose state) were they think that everyone is a homosexual.
Now being homophobic is the natural reaction, to the developmental disorder, which is the transposition of the unmeet male bonding need from pre adolesence which then becomes sexualized which is natuarally unwanted. Evidenced by homos themselves
@ciaochowbella So if I had to repress desires to rape or have sex with children like good old dead and in hell Michael Jackson the former homosexual it would make me angery? No but if everytime you said No ignorant bigots said it really means Yes then I can see how it would make people mad..
@ciaochowbella Do you know that homosexuality is not inborn? It is a learned behavior..
All homos tell stories about how they didn't want to be a homo. How they tried to change and how they were homophobic.. That is because it is natural... Being homophobic is natural.. You al prove it.. The way you dismiss me is to insinuate that I a repressed homo. You believe that this gives you the license to dismiss me cause I a really a Gay. Why because you are homophobic bigot hypocrites.
@BornHomophobictOO Do not send me PMs. I will not entertain your sly attempt to sneak around and justify your learned behavior in private. If you have something to say to me, say it publicly. If you're so right, then you can withstand a bit of public censure if you have ANY integrity AT ALL.
However, anyone who is so ridiculous to claim that his obviously learned behavior is inborn isn't likely to have integrity.
You've allowed your religion and fear of buttsex to rule your life.
@Anuojat While I also used to be a devout Christian (Roman Catholic to be precise.) I never was a Creationist, looking back to it, I realize I was never a true Theist at all, I was. Deist, I believed god started the big bang and he didn't interfere with any events afterward. But I took some time to review my faith, and realized I was lying to myself. I felt immediately better when I was able to tell my parents that I became Atheist, I got a less than friendly reaction to say the least.
I felt this way too for soem time: I had to be right. Or atleasst partially right... slightly correct... myth based on truth... ect. Until finally i came to my senses and said: "Hey why not!?"
Suprice suprice, me being wrong didnt paralyze me. It was one heck of breather into sanity :)
Its almost like theres no motivation to blindly dissmiss all scientific evidence out of hand, expect that if one does then atleast they can go on pretending little longer.
Has there ever been a creationist that actually read and studied evolution and DIDNT come out that experience without excuses?
So how does modern Evolution differ from Darwins idea of Evolution? Obviously he could not understand genes and thought that Evolution was a slow proccess.
Darwin was correct about natural selection and his predictions of the fossil record were qualitatively accurate. Other than that, he wasn't right about much else. This is part of why evolution isn't "Darwinism" and never really was. He got the concept and one of the mechanisms right, but genetics came later.
@AronRa I'm pretty tempted to watch all of these in a row and add all of them to my favorites. Not intending to be a kiss ass but really, your videos are very good. Of course I know most of the standard concepts of evolutionary biology, but you do this with an eloquent balance of expressing how outrageous their claims are but maintaining a calm and scientific approach to refute them even if they aren't truly worth the time if they will never think it's good enough.
@Megamildman A story that makes me laugh when I hear Creationists claiming that there are no transitional fossils: My brother is a paleontologist, and I went to his 30th birthday party at his house, he had a few of his friends from work talking about it, and they almost came to a fist fight over whether the fossil they were working with was a reptilian mammal or a mammalian reptile. They have so many that they'll fight over the details with that much commitment.
I wonder how creationist would react to this. Oh that's right. They'll label this as blasphemy simply because its just too much for their little un evolved minds
Awesome video! Can someone recommend a website that may have some or most of this in a format a high school student can understand? My son wants to write about transitional species in next school year's science fair and he's having trouble finding something that won't put his classmates to sleep.
@RayTech70 Have him read "the greatest show on earth" by richard dawkins.
Not for the transitional species thing, but it has AWESOME examples of evolutionary "historical accidents", like Dawkins likes to call them. Like our eyes being backwards, nerves making extreme and completely non-sensical detours to get to their destination, etc.
@thechessstick Are you serious or are you just trolling? Several times you have said to step out of our 'boxes' of thinking. Why don't you step out of your '2000 year old, bronze age myth' thinking. Attributing everything to god and the bible is like attributing the existence of dogs to Harry Potter. It doesn't make any fucking sense!
@thechessstick You got it the wrong way. Creationists believe God made a rock and said "You are now a dog" and poof dog. Evolutionists theorize they descended from wolves after domesticated by early humans.
@thechessstick Frankly evolution does. The theory of evolution has been around for over 150 years. And no creationist fucktard on the internet is going to disprove it just by saying that it doesn't fit in the bible. Guess what, your precious bible is just a 2000 year old collection of nomadic sheep and goat herder myths. It's a wonderful work of science fiction, I'll give you that, but it is nothing more! So get over your inflated sense of godly worth and shut up
Evolutionists are such simple-minded dolts. They are just the little misfits who as children so wanted to fit in but could not. With this group of simpletons they fit right in and can actually act like bullies. Wake-up you simple cowardly fractions of men. Don't be such fools in this war for our souls.
@thechessstick Wish you realized how foolish and idiotic you seem lo anyone who reads your comments. All over Youtube, you use such simple condemnations of people who disagree with you. Instead of discussing the topic, you call the people you're replying to simple-minded dolts or insinuate that they're gay. It's obvious to every outside observer that you don't really have anything to say and you don't have the intelligence to hold your own claims to light. Shut up and stop making us laugh at you
@TheZooCrew Argh... You are probably near me! Anyway, what I said is true. Sorry, that it stings. There are just 3 kinds of evolutionists. You are evidently one of them. Sad... Stand up like a man and fight. Don't be a coward in this war for our souls.
@Lightscribe225 Please let me help you. I didn't realize that English was not your first language. I said scientists who believe in evolution are dolts not scientists are dolts. Does this help? Also, I do hope that you are not an idiot-in-training.
@ThePsychoReturns Is English your first language? Evolutionists who believe in evolution are dolts. Evolution is a childish idea that is designed for the misfit.
@thechessstick Then it should be pretty easy for you to demonstrate exactly how evolution is false, and then substitute your own theory that explains the millions of points of data that evolution does.
@thechessstick "Wake-up you simple cowardly fractions of men." Odd, I could say exactly the same thing about christians.
"Don't be such fools in this war for our souls" If you can prove that souls actually exist I'll accept the possibility that there is a war fought for them.
I aint no damn monkey, gawd made me from dirt...LoL, just kidding, excellent series, I might just have to share with my friends and family on facebook.
@warren52nz They don't watch it because they haven't got the balls to risk their world view. Or they'll watch it with mental shutters down and rationalize it after until the memory of it in their minds was nothing like the video they saw. To be a creationists is to be dishonest to others and yourself. Even the Catholic Pope and other C. leaders don't believe in creationism - only the Bible Belt (because they're cretins), and people in Islamic states (because they don't know any better).
@Ackers555 I think it would be an interesting "side study" to analyze how human minds can see irrefutable evidence placed right in front of them with references and peer review and STILL think it's wrong.
There seems to be no limit to how delusional the brain can be.
Apparently William Lane Craig said even if he could go back in time to Jesus' tomb at the crucifixion and waited for a week and witnessed Jesus NOT coming out of the cave he would STILL BELIEVE IN THE RESURRECTION!
It's cognitive dissonance. It comes from the desire to be right outweighing the desire to know the truth. It's the same condition that allows staunch Christians to rationalize God's qualities of all-loving and vengeful.
We have to make conscious effort to throw out long held beliefs in the face of new evidence but I learned how to do that in my late teens when I dumped religion on its delusional ass. And now decades later I'm good at changing my mind if new evidence shows up.
Most recently, I saw an article on aerodynamics that showed that the curve along the upper side of a wing and the Bournelli effect ISN'T the main cause of lift in spite of the long history of that belief
The airfoil thing isn't actually that recent and is more of an adjustment than a rejection. I'm an aerospace engineering student, so I guess I get to be a bit ahead of the curve here.
Camber lines influence lift because they make the necessary angle of attack to produce a low-pressure pocket over the wing (usually caused by a shock) more realistically low. Flat wings are much more difficult to operate, much more sensitive, and require impractical angles of attack.
Bernoulli is still responsible for lift, but not as presented classically in most older textbooks. It's more about the directionality of the airflow (and the gradient of this direction change) than the raw difference in flow speed between the upper and lower flows (a rather simplistic view of aerodynamics).
Watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled. No Intelligence Allowed". Also, watch some Kent Hovind videos right here on youtube. Also, watching a few Ron Wyatt videos would be helpful. Oh, and watch a few Wilder-Smith lectures, too. They are very good.
@thechessstick first, all of them except Smith have no credentials to even have any voice in these matters. While Smith's claims were dismissed by scientific community a long time ago. Secondly, all these men were proven false on many levels many times. Not only did they distort information, they created new one and covered it with pseudoscience. That doesnt bother you at all?
@thechessstick ad hominem right of the bat when I asked a question! All those people you set as examples have been shown wrong thousands of times, do you realize that? The fact that you still protect them and those ludicrous claims they propose, just shows how much you are willing to lie and attack others just to protect your fragile fairy tails! You twist facts and claim absurd things. Your suggestions are some of the stupidest ive seen on youtube. You are a disgrace to intelligence !
@thechessstick Wilder-Smith was plagiarized by an evolutionist and the evolutionist won a "Nobel" Prize. What a joke. Well, Obama won one, too. So, that shows what a farce they are. He won it for "Peace" LOL. Wilder-Smith first suggested "fixity" in nature. Wake-up and fight. Don't be a typical evolutionist coward.
@thechessstick Who's the coward, the one who claims not to know but wants to find out, or the one who claims to know and refuses to challenge anything? Yeah, I thought so.
Kent Hovind, you mean the guy who said "you can take a single drop of water and have it cover the whole earth if you stretch it far enough," and "you can make a whole human from a single chromosome," and "the comet froze the woolly-mammoths standing up."
@thechessstick The movie "Rubber" makes more sense than all of those. You do realize that Ben Stein, Kent Hovind, and Ron Wyatt are the biggest laughingstocks in the entirety of the so-called controversy videos right? They're jokes and I feel pitiful if you're so gullible as to put any credibility to a minute of their videos.
slow down your speech this is absurd and i dont know who wants to listen to u rattle rattle and rattle off facts.other than that it might have been enjoyable.
Hey all of you evolutionists. Do yourself a favor and watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed". Step outside of your little government imposed boxes.
@thechessstick lol we've just watched 1-9 videos countering the criticisms of evolution. Why would we then go and watch a video of the criticisms, knowing they've already been countered?
If Steiny raises a criticism of evolution that hasnt been answered in this series of questions, ill be amazed and we'll both email someone who understands evolution till we get an answer, sound good?
@thechessstick Lol - that movie is a joke. No one with any education takes it seriously. It's one of the most bias, vacuous, and ridiculous documentaries ever made! Anyone who cites Ben Stein for anything should be immediately assumed discredited.
@StevenBee2 Expelled has a 10% rating on Rottentomatoes - even Roger Ebert, with no scientific background at all sees straight away that the movie is a fraud and states: "This film is cheerfully ignorant, manipulative, slanted, cherry-picks quotations, draws unwarranted conclusions, makes outrageous juxtapositions, segues between quotes that are not about the same thing, tells bald-faced lies"
@thechessstick What does that have to do what your previous comment or my replies showing "Expelled" to be an unsuitable source?? Are you very awkwardly insinuating that I'm gay? Are you a 10 year old child who thinks that that is a good come-back?
@thechessstick "Nearly all homosexuals are evolutionists and or atheists" Nearly all birds fly, that doesn't mean that when you see a penguin it is more likely to fly than not. What's your point exactly?
@StevenBee2 are you saying the bible is not ridiculous,is not writen by sheephearders and people that lived before the dark ages,by word of mouth 100s of years after jesus was exacuted wrote the bible.how many times has the bible been rewriten,there are at least 50 versions of the bible in english,so which one is the one that the christians use.o i forgot they use the real one,that doesnt have slaves,murder,incest,stoning,sex,war,mahem,children killed.
@MrEnlightenup nothing you say is incorrect, but at least the Christian religion is part of a shared fairy tale that is so engrained in our societal conscious that it is taking some time to outgrow... "Expelled" is bullshit. It was bullshit when it was conceived, it was recognized immediately as bullshit, and has nothing to offer but bullshit for idiots to espouse.
@MrEnlightenup nothing you say is incorrect, but at least the Christin religion is part of a shared fairy tale that is so engrained in our societal conscious that it is taking some time to outgrow... "Expelled" is bullshit. It was bullshit when it was conceived, it was recognized immediately as bullshit, and has nothing to offer but bullshit for idiots to espouse.
Creationist would never like to admit that Humans are Apes because their Holy (Un-Holy) Books have Denigrated and Demeaned all other forms of Life with respect to Themselves (Humans and that too specifically belonging to their family of religions caste system). They would prefer to die, then to accept them as equals. This is the same Phenomenon we had in our Past like "Slavery".
This video is why I love YouTube and the internet. although I could have got out a book on this subject at the library I would not have time to study it. YouTube allows you to watch many different brilliant minds and hear there thoughts. Before YouTube it was impossible to access all these lecture and such. I wish I had this when I was a younger man.
@itsuyo211 Kirk, and most Creationists I've seen, were refering to H. neanderthalensis, the Neanderthal. They saying that "Lucy" was nothing more than a 3' tall Chimpanzee.
we are still apes right now. I love it.
iculus1972 22 hours ago
holy crap im just amazed this guy can talk so fast...
cycophile 1 day ago
@cycophile and still be so correct about what he sais
doombow666 1 day ago
@doombow666 i cant remember the video name but couldve swore i seen him on a panel sitting next to dawkins... hes got the long crazy hair
cycophile 10 hours ago
@cycophile It's Aronra
doombow666 9 hours ago
If you can't find a crocoduck, Kirk Cameron won't accept evolution? I can't even make fun of him. Nothing I come up with can make him look dumber.
Danarchistic1 5 days ago 2
I told Kirk Cameron that Sarah Palin and I have a common ancestor, back in 1066 at the time of the Norman invasion. He wouldn't believe me. He wouldn't look at the documentary evidence--he refused to believe me unless I could show him a creature that was half Sarah Palin, half me.
NevilleRhysBarnes 6 days ago 4
One thing I've learned since I started discussing evolution on Youtube. ALL creationists are Liars.
Drweavil 1 week ago
@Drweavil Hey don't be so hard on them. Lies are the only evidence they have....
kusalaviro 6 hours ago
I'm always amused by this bizarre idea, considering that creationists obviously believe that all human beings are descended from common ancestors. Presumably Kirk Cameron believes that he and Mohammed Ali have a common ancestor. Does he imagine that that ancestor, that "transitional form" looked like Mohammed Ali from the waist up and Kirk Cameron from the waist down?
prodprod 1 week ago
@prodprod
The vast majority of creationist arguments rely upon not thinking too hard about them, as illustrated by your example.
TheZooCrew 1 week ago 2
I am amused that the number of dislikes is 616, an alternative number of the beast!
trilbybunny 1 week ago
Have you noticed how creationists look really unevolved ...?
;)
djbanizza 2 weeks ago
Since the late 19th century, it has been generally accepted by palaeontologists, and celebrated in lay reference works, as being the oldest known bird, though some more recent studies have cast doubt on this assessment, finding that it is instead a non-avialan dinosaur closely related to the origin of birds.[1]
LunaLaroux 1 month ago
Religion NEEDS to stay OUT of science class.
Thinkdeep420 1 month ago 16
SCIENCE RULES!!!!
Thinkdeep420 1 month ago
Unless things have drastically changed over the past few years, the evidence isn't as "clear" as you make it out to be. Fossil classification simply is a difficult task and one that had very sub-par practices in the past. For example we are discovering that many dinosaur bones which were classified as separate species are really of the same species.
As for human bones, they're very incomplete skeletons and, I quote, "can fit inside the back of a truck". And there's debate on [continued]
DemiImp 1 month ago in playlist Creationism
@DemiImp And there's debate on which fossils belong to which species. There's a book called "A Short History of Nearly Everything" written a couple years back that goes into quite a bit of detail about this issue. If you're interested in this but don't want to spend the money on the book, you can check out DRCited (youtube channel) has an audiobook of it posted.
Pretty much everything else in this video is pretty darn correct.
DemiImp 1 month ago in playlist Creationism
@DemiImp
"As for human bones, they're very incomplete skeletons and, I quote, "can fit inside the back of a truck"."
This is a dreadfully blatant lie. Your "quote" is either a deliberate quote-mine or it came from a liar of equal magnitude.
"we are discovering that many dinosaur bones which were classified as separate species are really of the same species."
And this changes anything in the video how?
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
05:53 The answer is bad reasoning, at least on definition given on item showed from "wasdarwinrightsite". But first, I think the top is a lie or at least misleading. Lungfish and Crossopterygians are too far from Amphibians. The criterium was maybe badly posed. I would prefer "sufficient closeness between intermediates between widely diverging supposed lineages". ...
hglundahl 1 month ago
@hglundahl ... Second, the supposed intermediates between reptiles and mammals, are we sure they are not really mammals, that they ever had scales and laid eggs? Third, the dishonesty echoes that of some evolutionist arguers I have known when arguing against creation.
hglundahl 1 month ago
@hglundahl
Thanks for giving your useless opinion on the word choices of a few people.
I'm sure we'll all lose sleep over it.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@TheZooCrew You missed out on the fact that it was not just about wording.
hglundahl 1 month ago
@hglundahl
But that was the only somewhat relevant part, as the rest of your diatribe was based on ignorance.
We have at least eleven full specimens of Archaeopteryx. None of them are particularly recent, either. In addition, bird evolution is documented by dozens, if not hundreds, of other intermediates between them and theropod dinosaurs.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@TheZooCrew Thank you for answering my question "Or have we any holotypes of it since?" - Now, looking up Theropod, I see it seems to be what is called Ornithopod, as opposed to Sauropod, and my question returns: any proof these creatures are not misshaped birds? I seem again to recall a news story about a common bird, misshapen exemplar, that was born with teeth rather than real beak. My theory is: T Rex was a misshapen very big bird that could not fly. Intermediates between birds and birds? -!
hglundahl 1 month ago
@hglundahl
It's going to take a lot of unlearning on your part. For one, you can't just make up "theories" and claim that they supersede science.
Why should you get a free education on biology and taxonomy when the rest of us have to put in years of work to learn this much? How about you go to school rather than post useless YouTube comments.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
03:10 two top reptilian features of Archeopteryx Lithographica ("Original-Winged the Stonewritten" in Ancient Greek, but that is just me being geeky), namely minus beak and plus teeth, have been found in misborn birds, in recent news, as far as I recall.
As for other features, how easy are they to verify, if the only one we have is this well known lithoglyph (stone sculpture)? Or have we any holotypes of it since?
hglundahl 1 month ago
00:49 "Creationists accuse us of pure speculation about fossils we DON'T find. But we know there had to be more than thirty of these alive at one time, and we know their population must be multiplied over several generations. We're also pretty sure that all of them had heads." - A set of genetic manipulation freaks might actually be just thirty individuals. And saying scientists of Nod East of Eden (Harappa?) did it, is as valid an explanation as "extinct species". Unless you beg the Q.
hglundahl 1 month ago
That playset didn't look prehistoric to me. You mean to tell me that we had plastics before recorded history? Doesn't that show you that god gave us our full intelligence and there was no transition of growing smarter monkey brains? Where do you come up with your lies?
hybriddefect 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hybriddefect
What are you even talking about?
Take your meds.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
simply awesome
KronosDeret 1 month ago
Your videos helped me destroy in a presentation for one of my education classes. While I was only supposed to present a brief history of evolution in education, I was heavily questioned by a group of creationists during the Q&A about the validity of evolution.
eyeEATyoBABIES 1 month ago
Never argue with creationists.
David.
davian3 1 month ago
A duck billed platipus is a great one to compare to that crockaduck .
gazamused 1 month ago
I fucking love you Mr Ra! Keep up the awesome work.
brewerbrian420 1 month ago
this video should have ended with "Still apes right now,bitch!"
ViralMessiah 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AronRa lies again on Bob Enyart Live.
Bob: "You said the fossil record has millions of transitional forms."
AronRa: "No I didn't. No I didn't. No I didn't."
See the truth at 1:20. This is getting old.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue I clarified in the middle of this video that by one definition, there are millions, but that by the most restrictive definition -the one that I cite here- there are only a few hundred species which meet those criteria.
AronRa 1 month ago 22
@bestvalue Actually, if you would listen carefully, AronRa does not use the word "forms" at approx. 1:20. He uses the word "examples." There is a difference.
micheal49 1 month ago
@micheal49 WHAT???!!! He doesn't use the word "forms" OR "examples" but that completely misses the point. He told Bob Enyart he said "hundreds" not millions when he clearly says MILLIONS. He has a habit of misunderstanding Bob and then claiming he is right when Bob is actually right. If it weren't so annoying it would be hilarious.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue ; myriads does sound like millions to someone with poor vocab.
FoxBatinaHat 1 month ago
@FoxBatinaHat You've got to be freakin' kidding me! He does not say "myriads" he says "millions." He just admitted it 3 posts up.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue Once again a creationist fails to read through the whole thing, or in this case, watch.
pythor2 1 month ago
@pythor2 I DID watch the whole thing. I actually really like AronRa. He's all right (except when he's mostly wrong). His discussions with Bob Enyart will stay on my IPod for years to come. Already listened to them 3 times. It's interesting to see how often they talk past each other. It'd be nice to hear them stay on topic instead of Bob always getting sidetracked and interrupted. I thought it was pretty classy of him to offer an undeserved apology at the end. Good Christian thing to do.
bestvalue 1 month ago
@bestvalue and another one bites the dust!
hempartist420 2 weeks ago
“Every species known in this series was found in roughly sequential order over a 500 million year period according to the fossil record.”
Classic evolutionary circular reasoning that the fossils are found in roughly the order that we presume evolution to have happened thus it is evidence of our presupposition.When it is not, and those that aren’t found in the right order are thusly put in their presupposed place.
2nd evoultionary falsehood. Interpretation based on our presupposition is fact
BornHomophobictOO 2 months ago in playlist More videos from AronRa
@BornHomophobictOO
Blatant lies about the processes of archaeology, paleontology, and taxonomy aren't valid arguments.
TheZooCrew 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheZooCrew "Blatant lies about the processes of archaeology, paleontology, and taxonomy aren't valid arguments" Is that your best argument? I thought so.
YOU LOSE ASSHOLE
MaximusArurealius 2 months ago
@TheZooCrew Blatant lies? really.. What is the presuppositon of taxonomy? that life evolved correct? thus similar animals are put together to support this presupposition.
When similarity has nothing to do with ancestory but with function.
Yeah that is why all of the branches in the palenotology trees are connected by wishing and not by fossil evidence but by the presumption.
BornHomophobictOO 2 months ago
@BornHomophobictOO
Your username is evidence of you being a total douchebag
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket No I can prove that everyone is homophobic by nature.. You are also, thus the username, you are just taught to repress it by a society that has been confused by the perverts as to their nature and why they are the way they are..
BornHomophobictOO 2 months ago
@BornHomophobictOO
Fuck off and die, nazimaggot
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket Oh so tolerant you are of others ideas and bleifs.. You do know that the very first meeting of the NAZI party was held at a Gay bar don't you? That Hitler was a homo and so was Himler all of Hitlers Henchmen were. The BrownShirts were put together by one of the Homos in the NAZI party and to be a member of the original brown shirts you had to be a homo.. Funny how those who support homos accuse those who oppose them, of being Nazis. Nazi = Gay
BornHomophobictOO 2 months ago
@BornHomophobictOO
Youre insane, fascistboy
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket A facist puts country ahead of everything.. I don't do that.. So why the intolerance of the truth? You can read the completely documented book online I believe..
Sonykroket are you a gayboy? Is that why you are so offended? Or am I personally slandering you in some way?
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO
Put a sock in it, fascist dipshit
Its people like you that waste valuable oxygen on this planet
sonykroket 1 month ago
@sonykroket Ahh the tolerant liberal Atheist comes forth. Only you are worthy of O2,,,
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO
You whine about tolerance with a username like that?
Only a psycho would understand...........
sonykroket 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO I'm sure you would love to ride some pole more than anyone else here in this comments section...
DestroyDogma 1 month ago
@DestroyDogma Yeah but I will resist it.... Just like you.. I have accepted my homophobia and it has been a great thing.. No more lies... ANd I have found others who accept me.. But I still run into the ignorant bigots like you now and again..
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO
The sooner you die, the better off this planet will be.
TheZooCrew 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO I don't know if you're a troll or not but claiming to be a homophobe you don't really have a leg to stand on calling others bigots.
YevonZ 1 month ago
@YevonZ Bigot... Person intolerantly devoted to their own particular belief or prejudice..
I came out of the closet years ago.. I used to hide my homophobia because people would label me a closeted homo for it. I then realized that they were just bigots and I had to be who I was born to be. Once I accepted my homophobia and embraced it I found out that there were many others around me who were also afraid to be honest and because of bigots we were forced to live a lie.. OUT and Proud..
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO So you were hiding your bigotry from other bigots and then became open about your bigotry? You have a dislike/fear/prejudice against homosexuals yet you can point to someone else and call them a bigot,and have some sick sense of pride that you are open about your intolerance. I would call you delusional but I'm still more or less convinced you're a troll.
YevonZ 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO You do realize that phobias are not inborn but learned and are UNREASONABLE fears, don't you?
Therefore, you may be born hearing impaired or without arms or with alcohol induced pre-natal trauma or some other sort of injury, but you CANNOT born with phobias.
Also, in a study done by a Georgia university, homophobic men had a stronger sexual response to gay porn than did men who were not homophobic.
I can tell what you're hiding by the way you hide it.
ciaochowbella 1 month ago
@ciaochowbella
Maybe thats because most of them are surpressed by their own reli-tribe so they compensate.
sonykroket 1 month ago
@sonykroket I has been suggested that the reason so many people think that homosexuality is a choice is because they themselves MADE that choice and their homophobia stems from resentment and repressed desire. They chose to be straight due to societal pressure instead of allowing their natural tendencies to manifest.
I don't know about you, but if I had to repress my natural sexual tendencies to conform to the rules of a church, I'd be pretty angry and shitty too.
ciaochowbella 1 month ago
@ciaochowbella
LOL good one
My compliments
sonykroket 1 month ago
@ciaochowbella Duh thus it would be a choice.
Homophobia is actually the phycological state that a closeted homo has (which is evidence of thier regressive disorder and the grandiose state) were they think that everyone is a homosexual.
Now being homophobic is the natural reaction, to the developmental disorder, which is the transposition of the unmeet male bonding need from pre adolesence which then becomes sexualized which is natuarally unwanted. Evidenced by homos themselves
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@ciaochowbella So if I had to repress desires to rape or have sex with children like good old dead and in hell Michael Jackson the former homosexual it would make me angery? No but if everytime you said No ignorant bigots said it really means Yes then I can see how it would make people mad..
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@ciaochowbella Do you know that homosexuality is not inborn? It is a learned behavior..
All homos tell stories about how they didn't want to be a homo. How they tried to change and how they were homophobic.. That is because it is natural... Being homophobic is natural.. You al prove it.. The way you dismiss me is to insinuate that I a repressed homo. You believe that this gives you the license to dismiss me cause I a really a Gay. Why because you are homophobic bigot hypocrites.
BornHomophobictOO 1 month ago
@BornHomophobictOO Do not send me PMs. I will not entertain your sly attempt to sneak around and justify your learned behavior in private. If you have something to say to me, say it publicly. If you're so right, then you can withstand a bit of public censure if you have ANY integrity AT ALL.
However, anyone who is so ridiculous to claim that his obviously learned behavior is inborn isn't likely to have integrity.
You've allowed your religion and fear of buttsex to rule your life.
ciaochowbella 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BornHomophobictOO hey Born, there isn't any such thing as homophobia. Nobody is afraid of a fucking faggot. HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
MaximusArurealius 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Anuojat While I also used to be a devout Christian (Roman Catholic to be precise.) I never was a Creationist, looking back to it, I realize I was never a true Theist at all, I was. Deist, I believed god started the big bang and he didn't interfere with any events afterward. But I took some time to review my faith, and realized I was lying to myself. I felt immediately better when I was able to tell my parents that I became Atheist, I got a less than friendly reaction to say the least.
pat5168 3 months ago
I felt this way too for soem time: I had to be right. Or atleasst partially right... slightly correct... myth based on truth... ect. Until finally i came to my senses and said: "Hey why not!?"
Suprice suprice, me being wrong didnt paralyze me. It was one heck of breather into sanity :)
Anuojat 3 months ago
Its almost like theres no motivation to blindly dissmiss all scientific evidence out of hand, expect that if one does then atleast they can go on pretending little longer.
Has there ever been a creationist that actually read and studied evolution and DIDNT come out that experience without excuses?
Anuojat 3 months ago
So how does modern Evolution differ from Darwins idea of Evolution? Obviously he could not understand genes and thought that Evolution was a slow proccess.
atheist101live 3 months ago
@atheist101live
Darwin was correct about natural selection and his predictions of the fossil record were qualitatively accurate. Other than that, he wasn't right about much else. This is part of why evolution isn't "Darwinism" and never really was. He got the concept and one of the mechanisms right, but genetics came later.
TheZooCrew 3 months ago
Arguing with religious people is like arguing with a 5 year old that believes in father christmas :-/
twistedbass15 4 months ago
Kirk Cameron, I loved you as Balki Bartokomous!
dbhill2005 4 months ago
@AronRa - where'd you get the ape classification criteria document at 10:11 ?
skamakozi 4 months ago
What's the reptilian-mammal thing at 4:43? That thing looks badass
Megamildman 4 months ago
@Megamildman Gorgonopsids apparently were badass -and are again in a few CGI videos.
AronRa 4 months ago
@AronRa my favorite synapsids, aside from elephants.
zillatamer 4 months ago
@AronRa I'm pretty tempted to watch all of these in a row and add all of them to my favorites. Not intending to be a kiss ass but really, your videos are very good. Of course I know most of the standard concepts of evolutionary biology, but you do this with an eloquent balance of expressing how outrageous their claims are but maintaining a calm and scientific approach to refute them even if they aren't truly worth the time if they will never think it's good enough.
pat5168 3 months ago 12
@pat5168 Just download them all and keep them in a holy folder like I did, and with Tf00t's WDPLAC.
Rarae192 1 month ago
@Megamildman A story that makes me laugh when I hear Creationists claiming that there are no transitional fossils: My brother is a paleontologist, and I went to his 30th birthday party at his house, he had a few of his friends from work talking about it, and they almost came to a fist fight over whether the fossil they were working with was a reptilian mammal or a mammalian reptile. They have so many that they'll fight over the details with that much commitment.
pat5168 3 months ago
"WE CAN'T BE APES! IF WE ARE IT IS HARDER TO USE THAT INSULT AGAINST THE PEOPLE WE HATE!"
I dunno if that might have something to do with it.
raichutoyou 4 months ago 8
4:33 wtf is that on the top far left. 4:51 is just plain hideous. I'd have to say that the mammalian dinosaurs were pretty damn ugly.
roxyosox122 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nearly all homosexuals are evolutionists and or atheists. You evolutionists are such dolts.
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick
You gotta be kidding me. You know how many guys I never dated because they held irrational theistic beliefs?
codeythesilent 5 months ago
I wonder how creationist would react to this. Oh that's right. They'll label this as blasphemy simply because its just too much for their little un evolved minds
AtheisticFighter9 5 months ago
i would like to see a creationist ask to see a mix between a human and a wolf. wouldnt that be ridiculous XD
werewolf873 5 months ago
Awesome video! Can someone recommend a website that may have some or most of this in a format a high school student can understand? My son wants to write about transitional species in next school year's science fair and he's having trouble finding something that won't put his classmates to sleep.
RayTech70 5 months ago
@RayTech70
Try TalkOrigins. They have a pretty comprehensive database about almost everything related to evolution.
TheZooCrew 5 months ago
@RayTech70 Have him read "the greatest show on earth" by richard dawkins.
Not for the transitional species thing, but it has AWESOME examples of evolutionary "historical accidents", like Dawkins likes to call them. Like our eyes being backwards, nerves making extreme and completely non-sensical detours to get to their destination, etc.
Good stuff.
ScientificBob 3 months ago
@Spocktacular96
You mean more like attributing the existence of political comedy to George Bush! Lol
macgeek2004 5 months ago
@thechessstick Are you serious or are you just trolling? Several times you have said to step out of our 'boxes' of thinking. Why don't you step out of your '2000 year old, bronze age myth' thinking. Attributing everything to god and the bible is like attributing the existence of dogs to Harry Potter. It doesn't make any fucking sense!
Spocktacular96 6 months ago
@Spocktacular96 LOL. Evolutionists believe that dogs came from a rock. Creationists believe that dogs came from God. Which makes more sense? LOL
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick You got it the wrong way. Creationists believe God made a rock and said "You are now a dog" and poof dog. Evolutionists theorize they descended from wolves after domesticated by early humans.
Lightscribe225 5 months ago
@thechessstick Frankly evolution does. The theory of evolution has been around for over 150 years. And no creationist fucktard on the internet is going to disprove it just by saying that it doesn't fit in the bible. Guess what, your precious bible is just a 2000 year old collection of nomadic sheep and goat herder myths. It's a wonderful work of science fiction, I'll give you that, but it is nothing more! So get over your inflated sense of godly worth and shut up
Spocktacular96 5 months ago
@Spocktacular96 See what I mean about the misfits thing?
thechessstick 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick "Evolutionists believe that dogs came from a rock. Creationists believe that dogs came from God. Which makes more sense"
None of both, because the first is a strawman while the second has an argument from ignorance embedded.
In short: both are logical fallacies.
ScientificBob 3 months ago
You know what I'd love to see? Corin Nemec become a creationist. Why?
Because that would be proof Parker Lewis *can* lose.
CristinaFernandez 6 months ago
Kirk Cameron is a parody of himself...
DrSpooglemon 6 months ago
Evolutionists are such simple-minded dolts. They are just the little misfits who as children so wanted to fit in but could not. With this group of simpletons they fit right in and can actually act like bullies. Wake-up you simple cowardly fractions of men. Don't be such fools in this war for our souls.
thechessstick 7 months ago
@thechessstick Wish you realized how foolish and idiotic you seem lo anyone who reads your comments. All over Youtube, you use such simple condemnations of people who disagree with you. Instead of discussing the topic, you call the people you're replying to simple-minded dolts or insinuate that they're gay. It's obvious to every outside observer that you don't really have anything to say and you don't have the intelligence to hold your own claims to light. Shut up and stop making us laugh at you
StevenBee2 7 months ago 9
@thechessstick
"They are just the little misfits who as children so wanted to fit in but could not."
Too bad the "misfits" are in the majority, making your statement useless.
Lying your ass off and hurling random insults just means you have a personality disorder, nothing more.
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
@TheZooCrew Argh... You are probably near me! Anyway, what I said is true. Sorry, that it stings. There are just 3 kinds of evolutionists. You are evidently one of them. Sad... Stand up like a man and fight. Don't be a coward in this war for our souls.
thechessstick 7 months ago
@thechessstick There is no war for souls. You are acting insane. Please don't spew your stupid here.
TatsunoKoori 6 months ago
@thechessstick Christians are also evolutionists. Proof? Go to any college in California, ask any bio student and chances are they are Christian.
Lightscribe225 5 months ago
@Lightscribe225 Christians who believe in evolution = pseudo-Christians. Scientists who believe in evolution = dolts.
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick If you consider scientist dolts then I must be an idiot-in-training. Why thank you.
Lightscribe225 5 months ago
@Lightscribe225 Please let me help you. I didn't realize that English was not your first language. I said scientists who believe in evolution are dolts not scientists are dolts. Does this help? Also, I do hope that you are not an idiot-in-training.
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick So you think that every biologist on Earth accepts evolution because they are all dolts?
ThePsychoReturns 5 months ago
@ThePsychoReturns Is English your first language? Evolutionists who believe in evolution are dolts. Evolution is a childish idea that is designed for the misfit.
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick Then it should be pretty easy for you to demonstrate exactly how evolution is false, and then substitute your own theory that explains the millions of points of data that evolution does.
ThePsychoReturns 5 months ago
@thechessstick "Wake-up you simple cowardly fractions of men." Odd, I could say exactly the same thing about christians.
"Don't be such fools in this war for our souls" If you can prove that souls actually exist I'll accept the possibility that there is a war fought for them.
davidsfriend01 1 month ago
i facepalmed @ crocoduck
martin1590 7 months ago
I aint no damn monkey, gawd made me from dirt...LoL, just kidding, excellent series, I might just have to share with my friends and family on facebook.
RandomBS88 7 months ago
Science is hard, creationists like things to be easy.
cichytom 7 months ago 56
@cichytom because you have to make an effort to not to believe in god. you must think you're special:)
briannacollins44 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cichytom "Science is hard, creationists like things to be easy."
Including sex. They won't do anybody who has standards of safety high enough to be inclined to ask "Do you have a condom?" Just ask the Pope.
NoNamesLeft0102 3 months ago
A crockadoc really? is he high
DarkAntiU94 7 months ago
1:51 no, sir, we haven't found crocoducks... but we have a beaverduck: the almighty platypus, so shut up, mr. cameron and study some science!
daskraut 7 months ago
I never get tired of this video. To deny Evolution after watching it pretty much PROVES you're brainwashed.
warren52nz 8 months ago
@warren52nz They don't watch it because they haven't got the balls to risk their world view. Or they'll watch it with mental shutters down and rationalize it after until the memory of it in their minds was nothing like the video they saw. To be a creationists is to be dishonest to others and yourself. Even the Catholic Pope and other C. leaders don't believe in creationism - only the Bible Belt (because they're cretins), and people in Islamic states (because they don't know any better).
Ackers555 7 months ago 4
@Ackers555 I think it would be an interesting "side study" to analyze how human minds can see irrefutable evidence placed right in front of them with references and peer review and STILL think it's wrong.
There seems to be no limit to how delusional the brain can be.
Apparently William Lane Craig said even if he could go back in time to Jesus' tomb at the crucifixion and waited for a week and witnessed Jesus NOT coming out of the cave he would STILL BELIEVE IN THE RESURRECTION!
Incredible!!!
warren52nz 7 months ago
@warren52nz
It's cognitive dissonance. It comes from the desire to be right outweighing the desire to know the truth. It's the same condition that allows staunch Christians to rationalize God's qualities of all-loving and vengeful.
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
@TheZooCrew "cognitive dissonance"
We have to make conscious effort to throw out long held beliefs in the face of new evidence but I learned how to do that in my late teens when I dumped religion on its delusional ass. And now decades later I'm good at changing my mind if new evidence shows up.
Most recently, I saw an article on aerodynamics that showed that the curve along the upper side of a wing and the Bournelli effect ISN'T the main cause of lift in spite of the long history of that belief
warren52nz 7 months ago
@warren52nz
The airfoil thing isn't actually that recent and is more of an adjustment than a rejection. I'm an aerospace engineering student, so I guess I get to be a bit ahead of the curve here.
Camber lines influence lift because they make the necessary angle of attack to produce a low-pressure pocket over the wing (usually caused by a shock) more realistically low. Flat wings are much more difficult to operate, much more sensitive, and require impractical angles of attack.
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
@warren52nz
Bernoulli is still responsible for lift, but not as presented classically in most older textbooks. It's more about the directionality of the airflow (and the gradient of this direction change) than the raw difference in flow speed between the upper and lower flows (a rather simplistic view of aerodynamics).
TheZooCrew 7 months ago
Not only that we are a type of ape, but also apes in a transitional form!
dredoc1 8 months ago
Creationists=Pathetic LIARS!
I Believe in Scientists--because I Care about the TRUTH--unlike religious IDIOTS!
flightkiller09 8 months ago
Watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled. No Intelligence Allowed". Also, watch some Kent Hovind videos right here on youtube. Also, watching a few Ron Wyatt videos would be helpful. Oh, and watch a few Wilder-Smith lectures, too. They are very good.
thechessstick 8 months ago
@thechessstick
Sorry, none of us feel like being lied to for hours on end.
TheZooCrew 8 months ago 3
@TheZooCrew If I wanted to listen to bullshit I would go to church. Plenty of empty spaces in the local ones.
ganados0 8 months ago 3
@thechessstick first, all of them except Smith have no credentials to even have any voice in these matters. While Smith's claims were dismissed by scientific community a long time ago. Secondly, all these men were proven false on many levels many times. Not only did they distort information, they created new one and covered it with pseudoscience. That doesnt bother you at all?
eleminatus 7 months ago
@eleminatus Have you ever had on original thought?
thechessstick 7 months ago
@thechessstick ad hominem right of the bat when I asked a question! All those people you set as examples have been shown wrong thousands of times, do you realize that? The fact that you still protect them and those ludicrous claims they propose, just shows how much you are willing to lie and attack others just to protect your fragile fairy tails! You twist facts and claim absurd things. Your suggestions are some of the stupidest ive seen on youtube. You are a disgrace to intelligence !
eleminatus 7 months ago
@thechessstick Wilder-Smith was plagiarized by an evolutionist and the evolutionist won a "Nobel" Prize. What a joke. Well, Obama won one, too. So, that shows what a farce they are. He won it for "Peace" LOL. Wilder-Smith first suggested "fixity" in nature. Wake-up and fight. Don't be a typical evolutionist coward.
thechessstick 7 months ago
@thechessstick Who's the coward, the one who claims not to know but wants to find out, or the one who claims to know and refuses to challenge anything? Yeah, I thought so.
andromidius 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@andromidius You are a coward.
thechessstick 5 months ago
@thechessstick
Kent Hovind, you mean the guy who said "you can take a single drop of water and have it cover the whole earth if you stretch it far enough," and "you can make a whole human from a single chromosome," and "the comet froze the woolly-mammoths standing up."
That Kent Hovind?
Megamildman 5 months ago
@thechessstick The movie "Rubber" makes more sense than all of those. You do realize that Ben Stein, Kent Hovind, and Ron Wyatt are the biggest laughingstocks in the entirety of the so-called controversy videos right? They're jokes and I feel pitiful if you're so gullible as to put any credibility to a minute of their videos.
pat5168 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
613 people can't take the truth.
BiggestOfDaddies 8 months ago
slow down your speech this is absurd and i dont know who wants to listen to u rattle rattle and rattle off facts.other than that it might have been enjoyable.
seanmahon101 8 months ago
Hey all of you evolutionists. Do yourself a favor and watch Ben Stein's movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed". Step outside of your little government imposed boxes.
thechessstick 9 months ago
@thechessstick
You have to be a parody
sonykroket 8 months ago
@sonykroket And you have to be a parrot.
thechessstick 8 months ago
@thechessstick
At least i'm not an uninformed superstitious worshipping dorkie like you.
Bible=bullshit, you moron
sonykroket 8 months ago
@sonykroket Oh, yes you are. You are just totally ignorant that you are.
thechessstick 8 months ago
@thechessstick
Yea and i'm ignorant about the Pink Unicorn™ too, dumbass.
sonykroket 8 months ago
@thechessstick lol we've just watched 1-9 videos countering the criticisms of evolution. Why would we then go and watch a video of the criticisms, knowing they've already been countered?
If Steiny raises a criticism of evolution that hasnt been answered in this series of questions, ill be amazed and we'll both email someone who understands evolution till we get an answer, sound good?
Oh and government imposed boxes? Huh?
ajsatchwell 8 months ago
@ajsatchwell LOL.
thechessstick 8 months ago
@thechessstick Lol - that movie is a joke. No one with any education takes it seriously. It's one of the most bias, vacuous, and ridiculous documentaries ever made! Anyone who cites Ben Stein for anything should be immediately assumed discredited.
StevenBee2 8 months ago 27
@StevenBee2 Expelled has a 10% rating on Rottentomatoes - even Roger Ebert, with no scientific background at all sees straight away that the movie is a fraud and states: "This film is cheerfully ignorant, manipulative, slanted, cherry-picks quotations, draws unwarranted conclusions, makes outrageous juxtapositions, segues between quotes that are not about the same thing, tells bald-faced lies"
StevenBee2 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@StevenBee2 Nearly all homosexuals are evolutionists and or atheists. You evolutionists are such dolts.
thechessstick 7 months ago
@thechessstick What does that have to do what your previous comment or my replies showing "Expelled" to be an unsuitable source?? Are you very awkwardly insinuating that I'm gay? Are you a 10 year old child who thinks that that is a good come-back?
StevenBee2 7 months ago 3
@thechessstick "Nearly all homosexuals are evolutionists and or atheists" Nearly all birds fly, that doesn't mean that when you see a penguin it is more likely to fly than not. What's your point exactly?
davidsfriend01 1 month ago
@StevenBee2
I don't know. Clear Eyes is pretty awesome...
iPriestHolmes 4 months ago in playlist More videos from AronRa 2
@StevenBee2 are you saying the bible is not ridiculous,is not writen by sheephearders and people that lived before the dark ages,by word of mouth 100s of years after jesus was exacuted wrote the bible.how many times has the bible been rewriten,there are at least 50 versions of the bible in english,so which one is the one that the christians use.o i forgot they use the real one,that doesnt have slaves,murder,incest,stoning,sex,war,mahem,children killed.
MrEnlightenup 4 months ago
@MrEnlightenup nothing you say is incorrect, but at least the Christian religion is part of a shared fairy tale that is so engrained in our societal conscious that it is taking some time to outgrow... "Expelled" is bullshit. It was bullshit when it was conceived, it was recognized immediately as bullshit, and has nothing to offer but bullshit for idiots to espouse.
StevenBee2 4 months ago
@MrEnlightenup nothing you say is incorrect, but at least the Christin religion is part of a shared fairy tale that is so engrained in our societal conscious that it is taking some time to outgrow... "Expelled" is bullshit. It was bullshit when it was conceived, it was recognized immediately as bullshit, and has nothing to offer but bullshit for idiots to espouse.
StevenBee2 4 months ago
@StevenBee2 All true. But the word is "biased." Bias is a noun. :)
(Sorry, personal pet peeve.)
MoriyaMug 4 months ago in playlist AronRa Foundation Falsehood of Creationism
@MoriyaMug Thank you :)
StevenBee2 4 months ago
Creationist would never like to admit that Humans are Apes because their Holy (Un-Holy) Books have Denigrated and Demeaned all other forms of Life with respect to Themselves (Humans and that too specifically belonging to their family of religions caste system). They would prefer to die, then to accept them as equals. This is the same Phenomenon we had in our Past like "Slavery".
sidharth0384 9 months ago
This video is why I love YouTube and the internet. although I could have got out a book on this subject at the library I would not have time to study it. YouTube allows you to watch many different brilliant minds and hear there thoughts. Before YouTube it was impossible to access all these lecture and such. I wish I had this when I was a younger man.
WillShakespeare2007 9 months ago 3
LOL HOMO ERECTUS
Xennavor 9 months ago
didnt kirk cameron or someone try to say that "Lucy" was nothing more than an old man with arthritis?
itsuyo211 10 months ago
@itsuyo211 Kirk, and most Creationists I've seen, were refering to H. neanderthalensis, the Neanderthal. They saying that "Lucy" was nothing more than a 3' tall Chimpanzee.
PikminDS 9 months ago