Added: 3 years ago
From: EuropeForPeace
Views: 2,982
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nice try Chomsky. i highly doubt the US is going to go "offensive" with Russia anytime. Espically since the cold war is over and each side has over 10,000 nukes.

    lol and this clown calls himself a "intellectual"? Hes just a burn-out from the 60's

  • The British earlier used to get those tough mountainous people called Gurkhas to help them to kill and go to war. Now American hired "contractor" at 50 to 1200 dollars a day depending on who, what and where these mercenaries are.

  • Comment removed

  • Painfully stupid, stupidly communist - self-loathing chomsky.

  • you really that ignorant? thats all i have to say to an idiot like you,,, what a joke

  • @xdeliriumx1 why is it always Canadians that support radical communists?

  • well if you knew anything about the perosn you criticize you wouldn't know he is far from being a communist lmao. Have u eve never read Chomsky? If you had you would know sorry little one...

    Chomsky a 'radical communist' lmao man get ur head out of ur ass lol what a fool

  • In the US you got brainwashed by all this propaganda when then u hear the word socialism everyone goes crazy. They dont even know what it means but they all think its 'evil' lol. Why is it always Americans that get all this hyped up and paranoid? lol

  • @xdeliriumx1 talking with a Chomsky supporter is like wrestling with a pig, everyone gets full of mud and the pig enjoys it.

    I'll take a pass on this one, but do tell us how is the weather on planet Loon today?

  • listen man your the idiot here, you say shit about people that isn't even true and then call me a loon lol. Right man seriously get a reality check., ignorant dumb ass

  • @AtlasObjectivist lolz. Says someone who apparently thinks that Atlas Shrugged is a literary masterpiece.

    I don't like how Chomsky frames a lot of issues, but he's an excellent writer (hardly the same thing could be said of Ms. Rand, who apparently felt that selfishness required an advocate) and hardly a communist (I'd know - I'm a Trotskyist myself). Weaponizing orbital space is a good way to get everyone on the planet killed.

  • @ExaltedLeader One has to really wonder about Chomsky supporters, what seems to be the problem? Where you abused as children? Why all the self loathing? Move to Cuba if you are so miserable here.

  • @AtlasObjectivist

    lol kid, please follow your internet cult("objectivism") and stop the hillarious comments

  • @AtlasObjectivist  Capitalism needs to be improved, but not replaced by communism.

  • @warriorprince1010 that's a fair statement.

  • @AtlasObjectivist Ya I've noticed that too. Somethings not right with the way their mind processes information. Nothings wrong with being liberal. But 21st century liberalism has morphed into a utopia-style mentality. Which all fails.

  • @xdeliriumx1 Not really, many people think socialism is bad because its economic and political practices (like collecting and gathering) have lead to the death of over 100 million civilians.

    One of the key characteristics of a fanatic is that they'll never admit that there wrong. This is why when someone disagrees with there idea they look for excuses like being "brainwashed" or "racist".

    lol silly liberals :)

  • @AtlasObjectivist

    What has Chomsky said in this video that makes you feel the need to spout such loaded bullshit?

  • What a douche

  • no this is good the missile defence shield will defend us in america and in europe from possible nuclear strikes from terrorists or north korea u guys should be thanking us !

  • Clearly you didn't watch the video you're commenting on.

  • haha lol you think terrorists have inter-continental ballistic missles?

    and as if N Korea would launch one of their handful of primitive nukes, when it would engender a massive retaliatory response from NATO.

    youve been indoctrinated my friend

  • North Korea doesn't even have conventional missle capability that could reach Europe, let alone Nuclear. U.N inspectors have already determined that Iran has no Nuclear weopons, and is not developing any. North Korea even blew up its Plutonium Reactor(Yongbyon) last year.

    There is no nuclear threat to Europe from terrorists. The only non-European Nuclear power anywhere near Europe is Russia, which is where the system is targeting.

  • The U.S imperialists want first-strike capabilities on the world, in order to black-mail humanity.

    Russia can't be bullied around by American warmongerers because we have Nuclear missles ourselves, which can reach you, and all of your allies. We already have nuclear submarines patroling both the Pacific and Atlantic coast-lines of the U.S. Your pathetic missle defense system is a failure, and will only create more tension between Russia's government and the West.

  • except it is being bulled, ramping up its conventional military capability and cruise missiles and strategic bombers these past few years in direct response to this Missile Shield. Which in all likely hood is the exact sort of response planners in Washington love because its a self-forfiling proof that they need to do this.

    Its China that doesn't respond and infuritates Washington because of that.

  • how would a terrorist get an intercontinental ballistic missile?

  • Jan, esta entrevista está en castellano (español) ?

    Un gran abrazo desde Bolivia.

    Nira Cabero

  • -- USA fuck OFF .. LEAVE the world alone .. rot in HELL...

  • i hope to god you're not from europe

  • "He appears to be another misguided rube on the KGB payroll." - and most American strategic analysts are also "misguided rubes on the KGB's payroll", right? :)

    "What are the Russians planning on shooting at Europe to motivate them to get upset about a defensive system."

    Look, how about the Russia setting up loads of "defensive" missiles all over Mexico and Canada? Nobody in the USA would get upset cos they feel like it's a somewhat agressive gesture or a threat, right?

  • 1) all of Chomskys work, scientific and political, was banned in the Soviet Union

    2) nobody said it shoots first, what would it shoot at? It puts the owner in a position where it can employ a First Strike with the knowledge that any Retaliatory Strike will be successfully deterred. Defensive just as you said.

  • GMD can only shoot a missile in flight.

    GMD has a kinetic payload, not explosive or nuclear.

    If it can't hit a Russian missile, like the Russians are saying, and there are only 10 of them in Europe, what threat is it against thousands of Russian missiles?

  • john pilger,noam chomsky we light to real freedom

  • Thank you for uploading this.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more