Added: 4 years ago
From: dafuckinmart
Views: 45,700
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (103)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Le me after watching this : "HANDS ! WHY AREN'T YOU CAPABLE ? IT SEEMED SO EASY !"

  • Ganz einfach fabelhaft. Der beste Chasse-neige den ich je gehört habe. Wie ein Lebewesen entwickelt und gestaltet sich das Stück unter seinen Händen.

    Die Aufnahme von Arrau ist auch himmlisch, aber diest ist etwas ganz sonderbares.

  • Amazing. I think anyone who plays this piece, let alone who plays it this well, deserves the utmost respect from the music community.

    For those of you who are wondering about the chromatic scale fingering:

    RH: B-D# (1-5), E-F# (1-3), G-A# (1-4), etc; yes, the pinky...the 1313 fingering wasn't fast enough for Liszt, and apparently not for Lugansky/Berezovsky either! Try this fingering, within a few min you'll be as fast as them! lol

    LH: Gb-A (4-1), Bb-C (3-1), Db-D (3,1), Eb-F (3-1), etc

  • The first performance of this piece that I've heard that I like as much as Berezovsky's.

  • @MrHeyheyhey27 What about Arrau? His is my favorite.

  • @OriginalBasaliskos Arrau does great justice to the piece, but I honestly believe that pieces like Chasse-neige and Mazeppa NEED a ton of speed, or else you don't hear the "fire" driving these pieces like you should. That's why I like berezovsky's interpretations of those harder TE pieces so much. It was said that Liszt and his students played Wilde Jagd in about FOUR MINUTES.

  • Did anyone else get terrified and think of Slenderman when the video skipped at around 0:48?

  • He's a genius! 02/10/2011 was a concert in Minsk, it was just brilliant!

  • I heard him play this in an old monastery in Mallorca on a very hot August night. Simply riveting. He looks like he stepped from a Tolstoy novel.

  • omo he plays so great on a Yamaha ?

  • Incredible interpretation! I prefer the Berezovsky's one too (but not those you can listen on youtube).

  • @oxsaphiraxo I've always thought of Lugansky and Berezovsky as two friends like Chopin and Liszt. Chopin was more poetic and light in his playing, Liszt had more of the power" and bravura. Luganksy practically worships Rachmaninoff, who in turn followed more in the style of Chopin. Berezovsky, has huge stubby hands like Anton Rubinstein (Beethoven reincarnate?) and deeply likes Liszt, Beethoven and performs Chopin like Liszt probably would. Both are different and offer great music.

  • @tchykovsky

    What a silly dichotomy.

    First of all, while I don't know much about Liszt's own playing, this "rather powerful than poetic" certainly doesn't translate to his body of compositions, so it's entirely irrelevant when talking about pianists performing these composers.

    Then, some would object to your point that Rach was "more like Chopin", considering he was also a fan of "hammy" runs and sentimental extensions - so maybe he was more like Liszt?

    This is silly.

  • Interestingly enough, they're both chess buds apparently.

  • this piece is perfectly written, one of Liszt better compositions as a whole, especially considering the substance and color changes within a short 5 minutes

  • Yay left hand cross overs! I found that a good tip for doing them is, even for those who still are more comfortable with looking at your hands while you play, don't look. Your brain will be able to feel it work together if you just space your hands well and look at the music. ;)

  • I have been at a Lugansky concert just yesterday. He played this piece as an encore.

    Simply breathtaking and staggeringly beautiful piano playing!!!

  • beautiful playing. much more musical then some interpretations. 

  • Bravo! great performance! beautiful Chasseneige... this work seems to be extremely difficult to play, but he put sensibility and gave the proper emotional load on his performance.

  • He is really talented, superb playing! Such a difficult piece.

    However I do prefer Berezovsky's interpretation over this one.

  • If you ever learn this piece, don't play with Lugansky or Berezovsky's fingering at 3:30 on those octaves. Use your second fingers instead of your thumbs there. It makes it so much easier.

  • He really can understand Liszt like Arrau did it....

  • This performance definitely redefines the Transcendental meaning in Liszt. This piece just gets to me. It is one of the finest examples of how incredible technique is utilized perfectly to break expressive boundaries

  • 1:22-1:33 is the hardest part to play right after memorizing and learning it. Giant jumps. I can tell he practiced it more than other parts because of how accurately and quickly he played it. He kind of neglected a few areas if he can play that part perfectly and screw up a bit in some other areas.

    Not that I didn't do that with this piece worse. Hardest but most gratifying piece I've ever learned, by far.

  • absolutely amazing!! such a great pianist...

  • i truly love this piece from him, i have kissin's and otter's and arrau's but he gives everything and he is sucha great performer....i like him very much

  • Comment removed

  • very deep...

  • He makes what he wants with this piece.

  • 4:07 Why many pianists neglect Liszt's indication "ritardando" in that small episode?

  • @DesAbends

    Berezovsky completely ignored it. Lugansky here did it fine.

  • @FranzFerencLiszt

    ou vecio! un esempio di geniale concezione lisztiana. a 3:16 c'è una scala cromatica. Liszt ha diteggiato 12345-123-1234 il che produce una velocità quasi doppia rispetto a una diteggiatura normale.

  • The amount of technical skill is over NINETY thousaaaaaaaaaand!

  • BEST!!!

  • ZOMG, No sound required to be entertained (JUMPS!!), But make it much nicer.

  • This is excellent! Thank you for video!

  • Comment removed

  • Now that I'm into this piece, I gotta say, for Lugansky, this is a bit sloppy. His Feux Follets was under par for him as well in this concert. The other recording of his Feux Follets was a lot better. Something was up with him that day, I bet.

  • So beautiful...Lugansky and Berezovsky are very amazing.Playing Liszt is a present of heaven...Really transcendental...

  • someone had said he was showing off by raising his hands so high... but im learning this right now... and was having so much trouble with those fast leaps, until i started imitating how lugansky raises his hands so high... almost instantly my accuracy got a lot better ... so maybe he isnt showing off

  • I don't think the height is the thing, but the arm has to be totally free and loose to move very fast to prepare the notes. The height is just a by-product of very relaxed, elastic movements.

  • I would really like to see your performance, would you post it to youtube, when you are done?

  • In terms of chromatics, it depends. If you're playing a slowish one (e.g piano entry in the Emperor concerto) 13 13 123 etc works, but for hyper-fast (this) fingerings with 4 work better

  • in my music for this piece, it has 123 1234 12345. it works very well

  • God. Listening him, piano sounds so easy to play. This music is amazing.. Liszt is amazing. So rich, full and dense like a gigantic river.

    Lugansky: great pianist.

  • Is he using a different chromatic fingering than is standard on those in order to allow for that speed? Or is it just so fast it creates that illusion...

  • its five finger chromatics, very hard to get smooth but faster than normal fingering. start with thumb on e, its 123 1234 12345. the thumb under the little finger from eb to e is the stinker.

  • Yeah, thanks, I want to add that to things I know. I play the third movement of the moonlight sonata, and I want that chromatic at the end to be a bit smoother.

  • I think 1313123 is best starting from c to upward. It works well with me and seems like many other pianist use it too.

  • To play really fast chromatics, it's best to play both.

    13131231313123 is good for changing direction, but when you're just throwing in an extremely fast chromatic, the other fingering is designed for it.

    Are you doing chromatics that fast?

  • Maybe I can't do chromatic scale yet that fast, but I will. Berezovsky use that fingering and it's lightning fast.

  • I looked, he definitely used at least four, possibly five.

    Lugansky uses even his fifth, and the score I have says to use your fifth finger. Makes sense where you place it too.

    You won't get 900 notes per minute with the standard fingering. It's not possible, lol. Going three quarters that speed is significantly fast for it already. Apparently, Liszt may have created it for these types of chromatics. Don't repeat that though because it's unreliable.

  • Actually I haven't played super fast chromatic pieces like bumblebee or some parts of this piece, so maybe if I play them I would realize that with 1313123 fingering I can't play it enough fast. But why to figure that out by yourself and spend a lot of time to do that, when you can just watch videos and ask around, like you did. Which really makes sense. I would do that too if I should play a piece like this.

  • it is possible to do that with 1313... and the notes will be way more equal just if you want to work on your technique.

  • So, can you play around 1100 notes per minute doing 13123? Thats how fast you should be able to do it if you want to to be nice and blended. Lugansky does it slower, at around normal tempo, so like 900 per minute.

    Berezovsky goes way faster.

  • I dont understand what you are trying to tell me but since im 4 i learned 1313123etc from my teacher. i tried other fingerings too but i couldnt reach the equality of the notes compared to the normal fingering

  • It's not as equal, which is why you use 1313123 when you're not playing at 800+ notes per minute.

    In this piece, the sheet music itself has this fingering for chromatic:

    Starting on B natural: 12345 1234 123 12345 and so on and so fourth.

  • Wow, I once tried to come up with different fingering variants for chromatic scales, but couldn't think of this one.

    Looks great.

    Btw, what do you think of 12341234 (starting from any note)? The apparent advantage is that it requires much less thought or coordination (esp. when both hands play chromatics in contrary motion, like in the climax of Chasse-Neige), but technically it's much less convenient

    What do you think, is this fingering realistic for smooth playing in fast tempos?

  • I honestly think 12341234 on any note isnt really possible, at most its inefficient.

  • Oh, it is possible, and it's getting smoother already, but I'm really not that sure about the efficiency question.

    If it's played entirely "inside" the keyboard, i.e. inbetween the black keys, it's quite doable in middle tempo.

    Time and practice will tell how it looks with faster tempos.

    I'm just currently experimenting with alternate fingering variants - don't mind my question, I guess.

  • This piece is going on my bucket list.

    I will play it some day...

  • This piece is great... Really great...

    I don't know why it's called an etude... It's one of the hardest things to play....

  • Etudes can be hard...they build technique lol.

  • Yeah, I know they can be and are for building technique, but this one is so hard it's more of a piece that you use Etudes to get to, rather than an Etude itself...

  • Nah, but yeh it certainly is hard

  • This is pretty much the first "tremolo" piece I've ever played, and I definitely disagree with you.

    While I'm far from having "mastered" it, I don't get a feeling like "omg so hard, I should've played a tremolo study before starting this".

    The more I practise all these tremolos, jumps and chromatics, the cleaner and faster does it get.

    Why do you think it's not appropriate as a study for these technical difficulties?

  • Oh don't mind me: I'm fairly inexperienced. I talk a lot and its usually for my own progression.

  • I heard Nikolai perform this live in Moscow in 2007, it was amazing... He can make a piano sound like the Berin Filarmony. Incredible!!!

  • Where was this ?

  • I much prefer Berezovsky's interpretation.

  • Another kind of comment:

    For those who know the Lord of the Rings soundtrack, a passage from the "Lothlorien" track (watch?v=dCLOtIzUQXs, 1:17-1:40) strongly resembles a short part of this Etude (same harmonies), namely 0:53.

    Just an interesting detail I wanted to point out.

  • It wouldn't surprise me. Film music composers often "borrow" ideas from pre-existing pieces and often long dead composers. Most people would agree that John Williams (Star wars and Superman, etc.) ripped of a lot of his ideas from Brahms.

    Anyway, this is a quite nice performance!

  • Composers have always been building on the music of their predecessors. That's just how art works.

  • Jesus....I hope I can play the piano as easy as him...

  • Bellissimo brano!!

  • Best execution!!!

  • me parece una excelente interpretación

  • Brilliant, brilliant interpretation.......

  • It's so good to see guys like this one. He loves what hee's doing....

  • Really good, but what a showoff he is. Raising hands so high while you jump is technically redundant, if not to say irritating. But the audience loves it, and so do I..

  • Comment removed

  • What facility!

  • Hehe, I admit I haven't checked out the score yet. I left the comment right after the first listen, which you can imagine, was very impressive. Later by listening again, I admit there is a minor mistake. Lusgansky seldom makes mistakes, that's for sure. He plays well Liszt, better than Chopin(his Chopin is quite cold and boring with constant pedal).

  • I don't know if it's the best performance,but it's certainly one of the best! Lugansky makes no faults in difficult pieces, by the way, have you ever found him play a wrong note? When I watched this video, impressed by the acrobatic moves and music, I can't helping think that he who wrote all this was certainly the greatest genius!

  • i've seen him last year playing this piece.

    I think lugansky is one the actually best pianist in the world along with Kissin, Volodo.. for his generation. On rachmaninoff, he is the best.

  • Liszt wrote this, its part of his 12 transcendental etudes.

  • Genius!

  • hot damn!

  • Amazing playing. Oh, it's a yamaha piano, maybe that's why there's a few discordant overhangs... ;)

  • Great! Speechless!

  • Wonderful!!!

  • I prefer Kemal Gekic's Chasse Neige.

    His interpretation is beyond to compare!!!

  • outstanding.  can't wait for the commercial recording

  • A true bravura performance! fab octaves. Is it just me or is his pedalling a little strange - sounded like a few discordant overhangs.

    I'm nit picking of course - he's a stellar player. Funny tho, I've yet to hear anyone play chasse neige - or no. 10 - as well as I believe the piece requires. There always seems to be more in Liszt's music than anyone has been able to draw out. Of the recordings I have heard I think I like Claudio Arrau's best.

  • Lugansky is a master! Simply amazing! Please tell me that he is working on a recording of all of Liszt's Transcendental Etudes.

  • @lensherr82 nos 5, 10 11 and 12 only :(

  • Amazing. Could be the best Chasse-neige I ever heard Live.

  • wow..

  • Bravo!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more