RE:Why I Oppose 'Gay Marriage' -- A Technical Dissertation Response to Cifier 2/3

[jarneyfs1]

Marriage is neither necessary nor sufficient for procreation or varied interpersonal relationships of any kind. It is evident that teleology has no basis in the construct as you attempt to describe in words whose usage and meaning fail you in an embarrassing way. The construct was that of a contract creating dishonour in the eyes of those who govern rather than those who obey. Do you understand now or are you still hard of thinking?

[Sage80]

@jarneyfs1 @jarneyfs1 Obviously you have a prepared response that keeps you from actually paying attention to what I say. No one was speaking of necessary or sufficient causality in regard to the biological reality of procreation. I think you're convincing yourself that by attempting to speak verbosly, in a woefully disoriented manner, you're actually making a point.

[Sage80]

@jarneyfs1 You may even believe you're intellectually intimidating. But all you just said in your long-winded manner was "Unmarried people can make babies". Again, completely irrelevant to my point. Your understanding of marriage is completely ahistorical & you are thoroughly unimpressive.

Marriage was not created by governing classes.

[Sage80]

@jarneyfs1 It was created & meant to represent the created order that is seen in the procreational reality necessary & sufficient ONLY within heterosexuality. The commitment is made in order to HONOUR the responsibility in creating life. It is not a contract between people who simply share a relationship & emotional reactions. It is founded on the teleological reality of heterosexuality. End of story. You do not define what marriage means. It is defined. And you are too. Loser. Owned. Try again.

[ZoeyK86]

I think marriage brings a man and a woman together in a beautiful way. thats what I love about it! :D