At 4:34 you said the only card missing was a diamond but the next card was the 7 of diamonds. How could you conclude that the missing suit is a diamond if you see in order a club a spade, a heart, and a diamond?
That's cool, but did you see Krystyn Lambert do a variation on this trick on Masters of Illusion? I like her version better. She allows the spectator to choose any card, and keep it. then she holds the deck that it's facing the audience, and while she is looking at the faces as well, very quickly riffles through the deck in less than a second. She then tells the spectator what card he/she chose. Your version is a simplified version. How do you think she does hers?
weak!
Magicwithcards 7 months ago
At 4:34 you said the only card missing was a diamond but the next card was the 7 of diamonds. How could you conclude that the missing suit is a diamond if you see in order a club a spade, a heart, and a diamond?
gorskitim 1 year ago
Comment removed
Donald6309 1 year ago
Thoughs cards r like mine but i dont use it no more cuz im missing like 5 cards.
That rick is kind of of cool but i dont like math ='(
ItzBadAss 2 years ago
That's cool, but did you see Krystyn Lambert do a variation on this trick on Masters of Illusion? I like her version better. She allows the spectator to choose any card, and keep it. then she holds the deck that it's facing the audience, and while she is looking at the faces as well, very quickly riffles through the deck in less than a second. She then tells the spectator what card he/she chose. Your version is a simplified version. How do you think she does hers?
TheMatrix72370 2 years ago