Added: 5 years ago
From: mamasume
Views: 137,988
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (191)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • su 30 has super maneuverability flip land with a 50 yard grass strip land less then 2 seconds and b4 the pilot hits the ground

  • russian craftsmanship at its finest....

  • @Magnedudewon2 Yep that's why Sukhoi is the best it's just the pilots underestimated the height...

  • @Magnedudewon2 Since that has so much to do with craftsmanship.

  • Even though this happens, Su-30 still rule.

  • 00:08 one ufo fly close of the flanker, and at time 00:12 another ufo down finally the airplane :/

  • @coroneljimenez dude stfu u fucking ufo fag

  • @coroneljimenez hahahah!

  • time 00.28 : a UFO hits the Flanker :/

  • typical russian plane hahaha

  • @OOIEatte i wont say that i think as much i remember cause of this crash was a bird strike unless russians were lying to cover some thing up

  • poor pilots

  • Is SU-27 not SU-30

  • No Su-27 has front wings. It is a late Su-30 variant.

  • Comment removed

  • 40M $ was over

  • @xaitienle I dont think it cost 40 million us $ over there in russia those people make things with much less money than US does .

  • You gotta admit though, that was a great show of Maneuverability.

  • You do not understand it advertising of system of protection and a catapult.

  • That was fuckin' stupid.

  • A-ha-ha! The pilot wanted to show viewers the work of a staff catapults!

  • THERE ARE 5 UFOs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • woah that was crank...

  • one helluva plane, we'd have a hard time keeping up with our F-16's against the IAF's fleet of 120 or so aircraft. Excellent lowspeed handling, acceleration, missile guidance, advanced ECM... truly a marvel of avionics and aerospace engineering.

  • Comparing a 10yo plane to a 30yo plane isn't a fair match.

    Every year counts considering that the Russians are no slouches when it comes to building aircraft.

  • funny because I was comparing the capabilities of two rival/competitive regional powers' air-forces; and last time I checked, an unfair technology gap doesn't prevent a clash of forces on the ground (or in this case, in the air.)

  • copy from wich jet ??

    US has copied mig 25 for f15

    and copied the russian's variable geometry jet(yes the russians invented that)

    and copied yak141 for f35

    the f22 has crashed in 2 times, the f117 has almost kill people in crash during airshow in blatimor

    stop your pathetic partriotique speech and shut the fuck up.

  • kiddin us ?? who are you ??it juste you who is ignorant and stupid there.

    for your informations the russians was the firsts who sent a space sat and the firsts who sent a man in the space and the firsts who builts a orbital station and NOW the international orbital station is built with the high cooperations of russians so THE RUSSIANS IS THE FIRST SPACE LEADER

    and YOU ,you should learn and read more before you open your mouth for say your BULLSHITS!!

  • First of all dumbshit I didn't open my mouth, I'm writing! Second I don't give a crap what you think. The russians raced into space before they were really really only so they could beat the Americans. First they sent a monkey and said " well close enough" When they copied the B-29 they couldn't even make the tires so they bought them on the black market... Need I write more???

  • blablablablabla ......i can write more too you coppying each other and fianlly american or russian it's all made in taiwan.

  • LoL

  • Comment removed

  • stealth or not you copied the concept and the t5o didn't exist yet it's just a imaginary conception ,and sikorsky himself was russian.

  • really? how do you know?

  • what ?? sikorsky or t50 ??

  • You driftkingz109 are stupid fuck, shut you fucking mouth up and watch video " The Truth About Useless F-35 & F-22 [ Sukhoi Stealth Killers ] [ PowerRussia ]" Russia is the king of the sky.

  • WHO Cares all im just saying is there both equal.. sheesh

  • F-15 was made after MiG-25

  • of course i know that the mig was made in the 1960's and the f-15, 1970's

  • Ok,I'll remake the sentence

    F-15 is copied after the MiG-25.

  • yup

  • Yeah, the F-15 was designed specifically to counter the MIG-25.

  • The MiG-25 is made for reconnaissance and to intercept bombers, transports and reconnaissance aircraft. The F-15 is made to intercept the MiG-25. The two are completely different. That is why the MiG-25 lacks agility and the MiG-23 and MiG-29 don't. The two latter could take on the F-15 but the MiG-25 couldn't

  • No, the F15 was designed as a response to the incorrect belief that the MiG25 was an agile fighter.

    The F15 flew first in '72 and the US got their hands on the MiG25 after Belenko defected to the West with his MiG25 1976, so no - it was not copied after the MiG25

  • @OpelGTC u r right it was made to beat the Mig 25 foxbat because of Fox bat had set the best climbing rate of any fight plane i am not sure but i think among all the fighter planes Mig 25 fox bat still holds the record of best climbing rate until now

  • @OpelGTC are u blind f15 dont look anything like the mig 25 the f15 was made to counter the mig 25

  • plus they copied the B-1 and made it tu160 they copied the B-29 and made it Tu-4 and they copied some of the missiles of the germany like the V-2 ROcket and named it SS-1 Scunner and a couple of su-27's that crashed and had some victims that the americans had to so please US and russia are equal! so can we just make peace here???!!!

  • excellent manipulation of crisis !!!

  • Australian Air Force actualy wanted to purchase 20 Su30s just like its neighbouring countries. Weird heh?? Maybe it is a good plane.

  • never heard of that, what's your source?

  • Hi. Ages ago there was an article in australian newspaper Herald Sun saying how Au air force actually decided to purchase those russian fighters, the deal was broken when america threatened to stop buying au living stock which is crucial for australian economy. Not sure what they ended up doing with that budget. Thats all i know mate, take care

  • hey, that's pretty interesting, im glad that we're getting f-35's but i prefer the Suhkoi's and MiG's, they are undoubtedly the most beautiful planes in the world.

  • that wouldent have happend if the pilot wuznt a compleat dumass a desent pilot would have know hey the grounds gitting closer maby i should turn the engin be4 its to late

    RUSSIA IS STILL BETTER EVEN IF SUM OF THERE PILOTS R DUMASSES

  • i agree with you

  • the ejection seat works fine.

  • thats not the problem the pilot was a dumbass... if he wasnt like a complaint lie russiangangster13 said this would not have happened. it put the soviet union of the

    su-30 a bad reputation..

    not matter what USSR/SOVIET UNION/ RUSSIA

    IS STILL THE UNQIUE ARMY

  • one pilot punched the other in the face after the accident...

  • Still, people find it hard to admit the F-22 is the best out there right now.

  • Raptor has only been in development since 1992. That is well short of 20 years. Only in service for 3.

  • The F-22 can fly with out the fly by wire as well. It has been proven in emergencies.

  • I think that all of you agree the fact that this pilot is first class for sure!!

  • Imágenes espectaculares PERO sin víctimas! xD

  • I guess there is a reason why the Soviets... er ahh Russians had to develop the best ejection seats in the world!

  • maybe the thunderchickens want to buy one of these seats in case another dumbass pilot calculate wrong their altitude!!

  • Russian aviation at its best ^_^

  • It's amazing that the ejection didn't shoot them directly towards the ground. Maybe it's just the way the video was filmed, but the angle of the airplane when they ejected looks nearly inverted (learned that term from Top Gun) and it appears that they were ejected horizontally.

  • Good that nobody has died, i actually expected it.

  • Nice piloting there. Way to give a good plane a bad outlook.

  • good plane can't defeat a good pilot...!!!

    so what u think if f-22 vs su-47 ?

  • you're kidding, right? at this point there is no aircraft capable of taking down an F-22 with a proper pilot, theres a reason the US owns the skies. now, an SU-47 vs an F-20, theres a question.

  • Maby, but a Serbian 40mm antyaircraft gun definately can... ;)

  • that depends, how good is the pilot on the 22?

  • Su47 would get torn apart besides the Su47 is only a technology demonstrator. The main reasons the the Su37/47 would lose is because they don't have the same level of effectiveness in radar, weapons systems, data processing & networking capabilities and stealth.

  • Aint That A Mig 29?

  • no.. SU 35

  • Su-30MKI, actually.

  • Su-35 ... I'm from venezuela and we have bought su-30's and su-35's ... Su 35 have those "mini wings" between the cockpit and the wings.. check it out

  • Those "mini wings" are called canards. =)

  • -Su30MKI has those "mini wings" (canards)

    -Su35 has canards

    -Su35BM hasn't (to reduse RCS)

  • this was show on the nesw showing the ufos which r seen on the video near the aircraft 6 seconds or 14

  • lets not talk about your plane exploding when you pass the speed of sound ein?!you would probably crash and kill yourself instead of injecting yourself !

  • When did an F-22 explode going supersonic? LOL

  • i was talking about f-14/15 you ******.F22 arent that good you know,you will learn in the next few years!

  • It will be many years before Suckoi designs a plane that can be a threat against the F-22.

  • not really!the su-30mk can easily fuck with the f22 !by the way,they are not "radar proof"

  • Any plane can fuck with the F-22. But it would be very rare. Not sure what you mean by radar proof though.

  • they are not undetectable !

  • Nope. the F-22 has better maneuvering. the Su-37 can vector thrust only 15 degrees. the F-22 can vector thrust 20+ degrees. F-22 is faster. Plus, the Su-37 is more of a cheap quickly built fighter.The F-22 is much harder to hit. Even with infrared missiles. The F-22's radar signature is the size of a pigeon. The F-22 is superior in all arenas.

  • F-22 is faster, slightly longer range, better avionics, stealth, more maneuverable because of better thrust vectoring, and more powerful engines. The Su's engines get about 27,550 lbf (122.58 kN) each. the F-22's generate 35,000+ lb (156+ kN) each. These are maximum tolerances. i.e. afterburners.

  • Also, please note that the F-22's ratings are not specific. The maximum thrust is still classified. Hence, the (+). It's maximum capabilities are still classified. We know they are at least capable of these ratings I have shown.

  • Please take into account the F-14 that flew apart at super sonic speeds was over 20 years old, and banking at those speeds is not recommended in any plane.

  • Why am I not suprised?another russian crahing.GO AHEAD!BASH ME.

  • I think this is the only way they can get kills with there junk

  • Great pilots, and great fighter. Respect.

  • Your comments are funny. Russian plan and pilots fall and somehow America is brought into it. I guess we do run the world. I can fill my tank for 3.00dollars whats it cost in your country. LOL.

  • Pilots are pro! they saved their lives in a second

  • Bye bye plane... Shame...

  • 1. Very strong motor!

    2. Very good armchair of the pilot.

    3. A strong design of the plane - it has not collapsed on a part after falling, and has burned down the whole piece.

    respect.

  • they have to much vodka,..btw,..russian have a lot of that jet...so...thats not a problem for us..RED ARMY RULEZ....

  • Este reportaje es de Television Española y la vez que lo ví quede aferrado a la silla...!! Los pilotos se salvaron por poco....

  • i wonder what they're doing after the crash...

  • under powered !!

  • where did this come from?

  • That sucks..

  • WHat bothers me is what happened to the crew after the crash?? Where they fired for destroying the Su-30MKI prototype??

  • Well first of all, it's better to destroy prototype, then to destroy a life.

    And those crashes (at wich dumb people like to state comments as: "the only thing russians can do is crash" and that kind of immature, ignorant comments. from immature, ignorant people.)prove also a point about the Zvezda zero-zero ej. seat (K36). Thesame applies for Kvochur in his 29 in 1989 and the famous mid-air touch-crash between 2 29's (that was because of clouds at that particular moment).

  • Those 3 cases have shown the great capabilities of the Zvezda (meaning star in Russian).

    And the Zvezda is the real star at that moment.

  • So stop this discussion , because it is worth nothing . It is just disgusting to see how many wannabe-specialist there are posting here .

  • It just comfirms that there are many (I did not say "all" or "major part")stupid, retarded, ignorant and idiotic americans and wannabe-americans (that's the lowest you can get) eating hamburgers and hotdogs with coce, and having no life and meanwhile posting such dumb things.

  • Because you know nothing about it.And go play your fckin gay games like indians and cowboys cause you've nothing to do here.

    If you have no brains and you know nothing about the subject, why do you post such stupid comments.

  • And now I adress, the major group that leave comments here at such movies/clips/vids (about airplanes).

    That group are the ignorant idiotic and sometimes even retarded (maybe even fatasses) "people".

    To those who like to pretend to be "aircraft-specialists" and saying dumb things because they know by accident the designation: f-22, f-16 or MiG and Su and (like i said before) , they all deserve to be shot (wheter it be from the neck to the head, or above the ears, I do not care).

  • Well, i see many americans say the f-22 is the best and nothing can beat it... .

    First of all, all those who think that nothing can beat it,they can go home now and deserve a kick in the ass.

    Those ignorants deserve it.

    Those who say "f-22" is best, but it can be beaten (what surely will happen, but that't not for now) I leave alone.

  • i totally agree........the americans are so amazingly arrogant - its plain sickening!

  • Yes, that is true.However we may not that every American is so.But it is true that such a phenomenal can be seen.

  • forgot a word there: "we may not say..."

  • true

  • (what surely will happen, but that't not for now)

    Something tells me there was some commie sitting around in some dimly light shack thinking that same thing about the F-15. never happened. :rofl:

    The Raptor is the king of the sky. There isn't an aircraft in the russian arsenal that can touch its avionics or weapons package. For air superiority, it's USAF all the way. The fighters don't fight alone, there's a slew of support aircraft holding it down.

  • gosh thats immense embaressment

  • i saw birds around the plane

  • can no one c the ufos in this clip??? watch it frame by frame

  • ummm, if by UFO, you mean birds, than yes.

  • see video seg for second, after speak .nave was kill for bad energys lok second 04,05 06 08 09, sec 10 nave is sistem electronic BAD BALL of energys was responsability TRUE please see second for seconds ARIES

  • miren video seg a seg Tecnologias diferentes controlan nave bolas de energia derriban nave,seg 04,seg 05 seg 08 ,seg10 logran su objetivo desestabilizan sistema electronico de la nave ARIES

  • In my opinion, it seems like these sukhois split-s very well. They're rear heavy and the thrust to weight ratio is just not enough to pull the aircraft up...stick to your typcial 'cobra', sukhois before you kill more airshow spectators...

  • not true.. Su-30MK Thrust-to-weight ratio on normal take-off is 1.04 which is quite good and definitely good enough to perform these kind of high agility manoeuvres. The pilot just made a sorry mistake in his altitude calculations. BTW this incident killed nobody...

  • i think borat was flying it

  • You cannot compare f-22 to su-35 or to any other aircraft. F-22 project has costed how much. What will be the price tag on one of those when done? Offcoarse you will get the best technology by throwing countless cash. The russian aircrafts are the best if you consider how much they cost. Same goes to any hardware coming out of russia. Americans make excellent planes but they cost is way over and if you throw that kind of money in a washing machine, offcoarse it will fly also.

  • and you now whu? because the russian enginears of that plains did not recivet there month payment for years! poure people!

  • Honestly, the Su-35 is among the best of all the great 5th generation fighters, even though it's considered "4.5". It's a mistake to underestimate any of the new 21st century fighters.

  • they used kerosene from kazakhstan thats why engines lost thrust... but the gunpowder was from china so seats ejected fine...

  • The Russians have proven that all the cash in the world can't buy U brains - Hey, has anyone ever wondered who developed the F22 ? Yes Children, FOREIGN Talent ie Russian, Middle Eastern, Indian and Chinese defectors - So all U ALL AMERICAN Wannabe's - Stop Fooling Yourselves la, OK !! ;3l

  • Can't believe there still exist ignorant fools out there who insist American Fighters and Propoganda 'Rule'. Y'all Americans wud do good to stop thinkg John Wayne style - Wake Up n accept reality - Empty Barrels make the most noise (Duh ?!), so be wary of silent waters ... U never know what lurks beneath !!

  • What those pilots did is position their plane in a vertical position knowing fully well that it will be coming crashing straight down therefore controlling the area of crash and saving lives in the process.

    Those pilots displayed great courage and heroism. I hope that they have been decorated for their actions.

  • Sorry bro...they pulled into the vertical trying to keep from smacking the ground again! They got out when "Bitching Bettyinski" told them they were out of airspeed, thrust, and options. Good airshow props!

  • how many SU did you americans shot down??

    ZEROOOOOO

    ahahah

  • Maybe if Russians trained there pilots they may get better than RAF pilots. That would be a miracle though.

  • kk, u guys can't compare russian fighters to the U.S.'s, since we use completely different tactics. if u take an F-16 and use russian tactics (or MiG-29s with U.S. tactics) u're gonna get crap. We designed the f-22 so we can blast u guys from long range. loool, it isn't cowardice, it's called being smart..

  • Hey Dumb Dumb, U ever wondered who developed the F22 and other 'america plane' ? Yes U fool, FOREIGN Talent ie Russian, Middle Eastern Indian and Chinese defectors - So U ALL AMERICAN Wannabe, Stop being Stupid ... and learn to speaketh the better Americanish, k !! ;3l

  • Dude do u speak-a any English.... or do u know how to type...stuttering and all...

  • all videos cooments in this sheet have treats American VS Russians? No way guys....the aviation passion don´t have flags or "the fuckin bests".Is jus passion.,I like PLanes,and i love all to...americans,russians,french­s,etc...stop with the bullshit...and peace for all.

    back to videos,is awesome the eject seats..working really nice!

    PS:im Brazilian

  • The fighter may be crap but the ejection seats are non plus ultra

  • In that i totally agree, those Ejection seats are awsome, not only in the SU's but also in the Mig'S the mig 29 that crashed at the paris air show made that clear also.

  • Why did the engine explode? I saw the same thing happen to an F-18 doing a supersonic fly-by on an american carrier.

  • the engine exploded because he basicly hit then dragged the engine across the runway! he didn't mean to du that you know!!

  • US fighters are sucks...

  • Su's suck, bit mig's are awesome :D

  • how come there is such word "american"? they are buch of garbage from europe! they are losers from europe, they don't want to feed their parents and hit their mothers!

  • At least we are not related to the "cheese-eating surrender monkeys" of France. By the way, isn't your country also filled with the garbage from America/U.S.A.? P.S. Tell your mother I'll pay her and your sister for their services next week!

  • Are these the same "cheese eating surrender monkeys" British soldiers that capitulated and fled back to England via Dunkirk? Be interesting to see what your opinion would be if you were invaded by a bordering country with a far superior army - surrender, or be killed?

  • I don't see Dunkirk as a surrender, but as a sequel to the battle plan.  By the way, who capitulated. I remember a specific beach the Brits used to return to France. Also, was it a superior army or bad tactics... let's all put our forces on a stationary battle line (i.e.Maginot)!

  • You're from britain but you talk shit about your own army...Just so you remember, when Germany invaded UK in WW2, UK was the only Nazi's failure in their Western Europe campaign because the RAF Spitfires managed to battled it hard and kept those Messerchmidts away, and the entire royal family stayed in London to show that they will never give up the fighting spirit of the british people. British people are no easy surrenders, and it is written in history.

  • maybe if russian spent fuken billions on usless tecnology we would have something like F22s as well

  • Bear in mind that this is what the Russians are willingly showing off to every Tom, Dick and Harry on the planet. Just imagine what they are holding back until the time for war comes. Also, recently Russian Sukhoi's have been managing to "buzz" the USS Kitty Hawk with impunity, not bat for the so called "inferior" Russians wouldn't you agree?

  • You must admit that those guys had balls! Trying to straighten that plane was not an option in that situation, but thay tried that! To hell with SU's, to hell with F-..'s, russian pilots are the best, admit that!

  • Russian planes are a bunch of metal garbage, the have no been able to shoot down not even an F-16, in multiple conflicts, and some of you ignorants say it is better even than the F-22, you shuld be watching cars intead of airplanes. this is not for you men. The fact is that american aircrafts don't do thoose fancy cobras and stuff but when it comes to war(AND THIS IS FOR WHAT THE MAKE THESE AIRPLANES)american airplanes always keck the butt of russians

  • yo chico...easy with the piano on the stairs...

    In fact, there is at least one case of a russian airplane downing an american one, during our times: in the first Iraq war, during the first night of air atacks...a Mig-25 downed a F-18, without anyone to understand what was hapening and managed to escape.

  • USAF F-15C 24 to 0 kill ratio against Iraqi aircraft flying Russian tactics.

    USAF/USN/USMC Fighters 32 to 1 kill ratio against Iraqi aircraft flying Russian tactics.

    There's always that one lucky bastard out there!

  • American planes have proven themselves excellent in bombing defenceless civilians in multiple conflicts all over the world. Even a Ju-87 stuka can do that.

  • This from a man whose country never steps in to do the "dirty work" and hides with the neutrality card...GO FINLAND!

  • Well... if you put a bunch of Vietnamese or Arabs who don't match with technology then yes, American planes with Israeli or US pilots do have an advatnage but a Russian pilot in a SU-37 will take down an F-22 any day, any time.

  • Also Comrade...are you talking about the same Russians whose flight hours have been drastically cut to funding...some down to one sortie a month!

  • yeah but the american planes arn't as swift and agile as the european fighters, and when it comes to close combat thats where it counts!!! the closest thing thay have is the f-16! but it dosn't come close to how good the tornados or eurofighters are!! U.S. fighters are good from long distance and that suits the americans because there cowards and fight from miles away!!!