While the right-wing Neo-Cons pretend to protect human rights, freedom, democracy and innocent civilians, the Neo-Con US government has slaughtered more innocent civilians in south-east Asia and the Middle East than any non-state terrorist organization. The right-wing Islamophobe hypocrisy is not just limited to their reaction to the Norway attacks, but this has been going on since the Vietnam war, because almost all Islamophobes endorse US foreign policy to the fullest extent!
I think the last argument was awesome, its true, they never wanna investigate the root causes of islamic terrorism to prevent it...but in this case they turn a different leaf
THIS RIGHT-WING ZIONIST CHRISTIAN TERRORIST SATANIC FUCK JUST BRUTALLY SLAUGHTERED 93 INNOCENT PEOPLE FOR NOTHING. HE IS WORST THAN A MONSTER, HE IS THE SICKEST KILLER ON EARTH.
MOST DERANGED FASCIST ISLAMOPHOBES ARE ZOMBIES WHO HAVE ALREADY LOST ALL HUMANITY & SOUL, THEY BREATHE HATE 24/7, THEY GET PLEASURE FROM PAIN, MISERY & DEATH. THESE WHITE-SUPREMACIST ZIONAZIS ARE DEMONS WITH HATE FOR EVERYONE NOT A CLONE OF THEMSELVES.
Say what you wish in abuse of my religion and I, for my silence towards the idiot is indeed an answer. I am not at a loss for a response but rather, It does not befit the lion to answer the dogs.
Nonsense, it goes without saying that attacks like these are wrong. The right wing is pretty big, this guy was off the deep end. "Right wingers" everywhere aren't responsible for what this guy does. This guy was a lunatic, no one should listen to his reasons, no one should read his manifesto.
@aveyowyns No, anyone who compared you to Hitler was wrong. You are much worse than Hitler. He was not a scum of the earth because unlike you he knew what he was doing.
@aveyowyns so why did the crusaders overtake eastern orthodox christian land, can you please answer that dumb dumb? hahahaha so funny your silent on it cause you just made an ass of yourself.
I don't need to read the Quran to know what's in it - goof
What whole chapter??? The Quran states - kill them wherever you find them a number of times in different places. Do you then claim that every single chapter in which 'kill them wherever you find them' is found, is about self-defense?
Just silly
*an Islamophobe is someone who has an irrational fear of Islam - Though I do fear Islam, it is not due to irrationality, nor is it the SOLE reason why I voice my opinion in this forum.
I fear that events like this will occur more frequently in today's volatile climate. The same can be said about 1930's Germany trying to find a group to scapegoat for their economic problems (being the jews). History repeats itself, and it appears that Muslims are now the scapegoat during these turbulent, uncertain times. Expect more shit to hit the fan, followed by more strife between westerners and Muslims. Sometimes it seems like bloodshed is the only way to get a point across.
I always said christian was a synonym for hypocrite. They're willing sheep who believe anything without proof as long as it fits into their bigoted views.
No thanks... you tell me I get my statistics from Islamophobic sites ... well, point me to the Islamophobic site that declares there have been 10 000 Muslim terrorist attacks untruthfully...
Don't expect to come to me with a blatant lie about my character and then demand that I provide sources
@aveyowy I have honest questions for you. Why your "peaceful" religion massacred innocent Jews and Muslims in Jerusalem during Crusades? Why Christian conquistadors massacred Native Americans in the name of Jesus? Why Christian inquision massacred muslims, jews and women during middle-ages? The last question: imagine a schizophrenic blood-thirsty man killing women and children suddenly says that he's good, asks to love everyone and follow him. Would you follow him? Give me honest answers.
The Crusades was a response TO Muslims trying to overtake Jerusalem. MUSLIMS were the one's killing Jews, so don't get it twisted. The InquisiTIon was politically motivated, not religiously motivated (point me to a verse in the Bible that declares Christians have the right to kill unbelievers).
@aveyowyns Your first sentence was enough for me to expose in what kind of fantasy world you are living. The whole educated world knows and bashes the Christian Crusaders for killing innocent Jewish and Muslim people in Jerusalem who were living there together before Crusaders came yet you are telling me that Muslims killed those Jews? Go rewrite the history books and then I'll take you seriously because you'll have something to back up your claims. And yes, u are following ur schizopheric god.
Christianity needs no excuses - no Muslim can point to a single verse in the Bible commanding Christians to kill unbelievers, so supposed terrorist attacks done in the name of Christianity can easily be distinguished from TRUE Christianity - unlike the countless verses in the Quran commanding Muslims to kill various kinds of unbelievers 'wherever you find them,' as well as your prophet murdering in his wake leading as an example...
Yeah, you obviously haven't read the Qur'an: Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.(60:8).
Maybe you should focus more on comprehending what you read than reading into it what you want. You have the same comprehension level of a terrorist.
You didn't address the verses (I think there are five) that states Muslims have the right to kill unbelievers, the dishonest, and Jews.
"You have the same comprehension level of a terrorist."
LOL ...and you know the comprehension level of a terrorist? If I had compared YOU to a terrorist, I would be condemned of being racist ... it's nice to see Muslims partake in the double standard Leftist media has created.
Yeah, I did. THey have a right under particular conditions (Like for self defense). Theres nothing wrong with defending yourself.
And no, Im not being a racist or having double standards. I call people who support Osama Bin Laden idiots all the time. I also happen to call people who think like him idiots all the time. Hence, you're an idiot.
Pursuing unbelievers he dishonest, and Jews is NOT an act of self defense. You are right in the fact that there is nothing wrong with defending one's self, but these instances are NOT self defense!
Of course, you missed the point. If I, or anyone else, were to call you a terrorist or compare you to a terrorist in even the most benign manner - they would be considered racist - but you do it to other people?
What you think about my intelligence is of no concern to me
What's more, I dislike Islam - not Muslims. In fact I have more sympathy towards the terrorists who've been brainwashed by which your Holy Book was the primary means, thab dishonest and deceitful Muslims like yourself and Sammi who like to pretend the Quaran does not in any way endorse terrorist killings and upholds western values, while calling people who point out said blatant lie 'Islamophobes.'
That's because a person with even one brain cell who reads the Qur'an will know it doesn't say that. You really have to either A) Be a moron or B) Be a liar...to conceive the Qur'an being that way.
Im aware of the term given the fact that I hold a BA in Western Philosophy and am currently finishing two MAs, one of which is in Western Phil and the other in Islamic Studies. SO. no need to look it up. Your evasiveness is rather telling. I show you a counter example to explain the nuance of the directives in the Qur'an towards non-believers and you just ignore it to claim something else.
Once again, another sign of your failure to understand or argue your own position.
I care not for your education - as you make it clear that even the educated can be deceive and work to deceive others (LOL - let's not forget that lying for the sake of Islam is mandated in the Quran!)
I am well aware of the fact that Mohammad had some benign things to say about unbelievers, but as you and I are both aware, they are abrogated by the later verse that command Muslims to slay unbelievers.
*You speak of my evasiveness and you blatantly ignore the content I listed?? lolz
@aveyowyns You have no arguments to be valid or invalid in the first place. Nobody takes you seriously here. You are a brainwashed christian girl living somewhere in the forest. Go hunt animals instead of spamming muslim videos with your bullshit.
I did make an argument; it being that one conservative terrorist in Norway does not change the fact that Islam is a religion that supports terrorism - 10 000 in the last year to be exact.
The only objection you provided was that the verses condoning terrorism were to be understood under the context of self-defense; and my objection was that these verse were NOT understood under the context of self-defense, and the verses commanding Muslims to live at peace with others...
And your objection was bullshit as usual because you have yet to provide evidence to the contrary. You just say things and then expect people to believe you. You are not an Islamic scholar. You don't even have any basic understanding of the religion. All the crap you're saying is copy and paste from placed like Jihad-Watch or Atlus Shrugs. And even if that was the ONLY conservative attack (lets not mention the countless wars and deaths of civilians in their name as well)...
I did provide evidence, you goof! Verses showing kindness to unbelievers are abrogated by later verse commanding Muslims to kill unbelievers, Jews, the untrustworthy, those who leave Islam, idolaters, etc, etc.
I have never visited Jihad-Watch or Atlas Shrugs... though I don't think telling you otherwise will make a difference.
I don't just expect 'people' to believe me, I expect YOU, the Muslims, quick to flaunt his degrees, to know what I'm already talking about!
I mean, I'm really surprised you have the gall to even challenge me. You really must be living in your own little deluded world if you honestly believe you have the same intellectual capacity to take me on. It's like a midget trying to punch a basketball player in the face. You're really reaching for something you can't or never will have. If you really want to be at my level you need to pursue that sort of education. In the meantime, you're just someone for me to laugh at.
You have yet to provide more than ad hominem attacks about my character and intelligence, so if there is some kind of 'intellectual capacity' to be seen from you, I have yet to see it. Do you really think you can bully me with your 'degrees.'
I am pursuing your kind of education, you joke. I'm in my third year at the University of Windsor getting my English and Creative Writing degree and minoring in Philosophy! A quick look at my profile would've told you the same!
...were abrogated by verses written later, commanding Muslims to 'kill unbelievers' wherever they are found, and not to take pagans for friends...
To which you responded with fallacies and insults.
I would find your belief in not needing to have 'a conversation with an idiot,' if you had not responded to me in the first place, and then continued the discussion for more than a day!
I'm a plush toy that is better at having conversation than you, a uni graduate, so that's more insulting to you!
...you still can't compare. Your response to me was to bring up a fallacy that I didn't even commit, attempt to lecture me about my own religion when I'm actually studying it formally in an Islamic country, and then when I correct you to say that I am LYING because you believe my religion commands me to lie to you. Btw, that's called "poisoning the well", something Im sure you haven't wikipediaed yet Ms. Internet superhero.
Im only responding to you because you're entertaining.
The fallacies you committed were the 'ad hominem attack' (I think you're stupid, therefore you're wrong), and the false dichotomy (that the only way I could understand the Quran in the way I do would make me either an idiot or a liar).
I did not claim that because the Quran endorses lying for Islam that you were therefore lying ... I only mentioned it as an addition to the crap-load of crap within the Quran.
No, you don't find me entertaining, you find me infuriating. I find YOU entertaining!
@aveyowyns he finds you ANNOYING. not infuriating, but ANNOYING. Because you do not know ANYTHING about Islam. It is an idiot, who talks about things he doesnot even know. Please talk about stuff that you know well.
@aveyowyns the crusade was a response to Muslims trying to take Jerusalem? lol, you do know Jerusalem was already under Muslim rule for centuries? haha, that is truly funny, making history up to try and justify something, right wingers are known for that though.
@aveyowyns btw, if the crusades were defensive to end Muslim conquest, why did the Crusaders end up in a civil war with the eastern orthodox Church, which led the Crusaders to conquer and take their Christian brethren land, the very same thing they were supposedly fighting against, to defend Christian land from conquest, yet the Crusaders took the land from the orthodox Christians, or are you so ignorant you weren't aware about this part of the Crusaders history? wahahaha
@aveyowyns lol, what a way to ignore everything i said, why didn't you address the part about the crusaders starting a civil war with the orthodox church, and conquering eastern orthodox land? now address that point please, or just admin your stupid and never knew that.
94 per cent of all terrorist attacks at least between 1980 and 2005 came from non-Muslims! The pie chart is on the FBI's (of all places) website and loonwatch has a piece on it.
The small percentage that happen to make it on the news are blown up for various political agendas. So when someone says most terrorist attacks come from Muslims, they're clearly sheeple only listening and believing everything their media mummy tells them.
The media didn't focus on Brievik bcos it doesn't suit their causes. It should have been on the news and talked about for days, since it was such a tragic attack.
If u look thru history, u can see that there has always been a group of ppl that were stigmatized and humiliated by those who deem themselves superior.
How much terrorism took place during the crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, on civilians in Iraq, Afgan.., Bosnia?& when Europeans exterminated the native Americans and Aborigines?
If the person who killed 90+ people in Norway was a Muslim, the Press would have declared him as terrorist. For now though, he is just an 'Assailant ', 'Attacker' (Reuters), 'Gunman' (BBC, CNN & Al Jazeera). Looks like 'Terrorist' is a name reserved for Muslims? The US Dept of State calls it an 'Act of Violence', Not an 'Act of Terrorism'. Share this status and let the world know about hypocrites
Europe really got paranoia about muslims taking over their land.. COME ON! WE ARE ALL OF THE HUMAN RACE.. Everyone has the choice to live where they want!
Pamela Geller is an total idiot but if you think you don't have your fair share of nutters in the Islamic world you're kidding yourself. In England we have Anjem Choudary who has previously blamed the 9/11 attack squarely on America and says the victims weren't innocent as they weren't Muslim. At the moment he's trying to enforce Shariah in parts of London. He's one of many, so we don't have to "imagine" if a Muslim did the same.
8:00-8:16 ... And by the way I encourage you too look at that picture. I mean Pamala Geller..I mean I know you've done plastic sergery, but have they done plastic surgery with your eyes? You can't look properly?
ROFL (Rolling On Floor Laughing).
SamiZaatari I know you aren't the kind of guy that likes to insult but your insult is warranted :P (sweet).
والله تقف حروفي وتعجز كلماتي عن شكرك على كل ما تقدمه للدفاع عن المسلمين
اسأل الله الكريم رب العرش العظيم ان يرفع قدرك ويعلي شأنك في الدنيا والاخره ويجعل جميع اعمالك وفيديواتك في ميزان حسناتك ويفرج همومك ويحقق امانيك ويرزقك من حيث لا تحتسب إنه على كل شيء قدير
اعذرني انا اكتب لك بالعربي لأن اللغه العربيه كما تعلم هي الأبلغ وهي الأجمل
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
1 Right wing terrorist attack vs 10 000 Muslim terrorist attacks, in the last ten years = no comparison
Said terrorist was not American, so to compare the rightwing agenda of a Swede to the rightwing agenda of an American is utterly stupid.
It would be one thing if these attacks happened in America, but they didn't! Rightwingers in America need not 'react' to the terrorist bombing because that it was completely evil is obvious to us and most Americans, the same CANNOT be said about Muslims/Islam
what you mean to say is 1 9/11 and 10000 attacks of america on innocent people right? open your eyes mun. look what america has done to the world. in the past 200 years and in the past 20 years.
@aveyowyns yeah, he wasn't an american right winger, american right wingers prefer to invade entire countries like Iraq and have very grand imperialist ideas, this right wing terrorist actually advocated against imperialism, so true, their not the same, american right wingers are more crazy.
@SamiZaatari "american right wingers prefer to invade entire countries like Iraq and have very grand imperialist ideas"
Well, American right wingers tend to be almost as superstitious as muslims and when you think God is on your side the way to imperialist ideas is fairly short. Although to be fair, the US has nothing like the Jihadist world domination doctrine forming the very basis of their religion. They at least see the need to have secular excuses, which hold them back a bit.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@SamiZaatari However, you're completely missing the mark with respect to Iraq. Iraq was a necessary retaliation to prevent further Jihadist attacks on US soil after 9/11. It had absolutely nothing to do with imperialism and everything to throw some major losses into the faces of superstitious clowns who would otherwise hold that Allah was with them and pressing further attacks. At least Bush understood the Jihadist mentality enough to do that one thing right.
@Gnomefro attacking iraq was to prevent further jihadist attacks???? have you been smoking that crack bush was???? there was no jihadists from iraq planning to attack the U.S., all the jihadists in iraq established themselves there after the invasion and they became active. as for having nothing to do with imperialism, thats why their building the biggest american embassy in the world, setting up american bases, oh yeah no imperialism here folks, hahah you should become a comedian.
@mattschol the embassy is a mini city incase you didn't know, it's not just any embassy, it's the largest one they are making, and add this to the fact that they are also building military bases over there (a point you ignored).
@SamiZaatari They make it that big so that they can have a buffer zone bc it's likely to be attacked. Military bases, so what? We establish military bases with the consent of the locals. It would only be imperialism if we were taxing them. It's bullshit that we're paying for their defense, the majority are happy to have us.
@mattschol with the consent of the local people? BSSSSSSSS the iraqis don't want any foreign military base in their country, who in this blue world are you kidding????? poll after poll shows iraqis want every foreign soldier OUT of their country. you yourself said the embassy is going to be like a buffer zone, well smart guy, if the people wanted you there, why is there a risk of an attack? nobody wants you there.
@SamiZaatari Well the Iraqis in power obviously know better. They could score many political points by pushing the US out(and some of them are trying to), but they know it's better for Iraq to have a US base there. Think about it,; they have virtually no threat of foreign(Iran) invasion. Why is there a risk of attack on the embassy? As your video addressed; it only takes 1 ultra-nationalist to launch an attack.
@mattschol iran ain't never going to invade iraq, with or without the U.S., why in the world would Iran invade Iraq when many of the Iraqi politicians are good friends with Iran? also if Iran wanted to invade Iraq, they would have done it in the 90's when Iraq was under sanctions and had the whole world against them, and were in a huge state of weakness. Iran doesn't even have a record of invading other countries, so all this talk of Iran invading this or that is pure fantasy myth to cause fear
@SamiZaatari Saddam pretended to have a nuclear program precisely because he was worried about an Iranian invasion. Iran was on the offensive for the majority of the Gulf War. US military bases around the world have brought about an unprecedented level of global stability and what do we get for it?
@mattschol yeah iran were on the offensive for the majority of the gulf war, a war they didn't start. U.S. bases have brought global stability??? you do know men like bin laden created their groups precisely as a result of U.S. bases in their country.....yeah, lot's of stability!
@SamiZaatari And now he's dead. Yes, it is a lot of stability. A terrorist attack is nothing compared to full scale conventional warfare. Did you notice we haven't had much of that lately? You can't just take that for granted.
@mattschol no terrorist attack true, but you do know, they planned one major attack to suck you into a long continual war, which is what they got in afghanistan, their intent was to get you in a long war to basically bleed you dry, which is what is happening, the wars are costing so much and are have a major impact on economy, so things are still going according to plan in their minds as your still fighting an unwinnable war in afghanistan that is simply costing billions.
@Gnomefro "Iraq was a necessary retaliation" The flip side that attack on U.S, was due to American harboring of terror carried out by Israel in Palestine and continue to support illegal occupation of Internationally recognized Palestinians territories. If there is logic and rational in your comments then apply same logic and rational to those muslims who attacked U.S as well. Likewise all Iraqis have more reason to come after America for death and destruction carried out on the Iraqis soil.
@Gnomefro Your a fucken moron. Bush senior always wanted to invade Iraq and so did Israel. Iraq had no links to the terrorist attacks. Saddam was a US ally. He had no WMDS. And most importantly Bush JNR apologised for Iraq confirming it was a mistake. So wake the fuck up take the blindfold off of your eyes.
@Gnomefro Do you have any evidence from the US or neutral parties that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist attack? Bring me the evidence and I will believe it.
@Gnomefro ''Iraq was a necessary retaliation to prevent further Jihadist attacks on US soil after 9/11. It had absolutely nothing to do with imperialism''
Pamella Geller is crazy, a fringe group figurehead just like your average far right Islamist wacko mouthpiece such as anjem choudary. So, the extreme right are hypocrites as well as crazy, big surprise!
Iraq was invaded because it was a threat to it's neighbours and Afghanistan because it allowed Islamist extremists to wage war on countries with impunity.
@aveyowyns Take your fake bull shit elsewhere. Islamic terrorism only make up 0.04% of todays terrorist attacks. And rightwingers and separatist make a whopping 80% of terrorist attacks. Stop spewing infactual media fed propaganda. I will live my life standing for truth no matter where it takes me.
Muslims aren't killed by Americans - Iraqis who happen to be Muslim are killed by Americans.
No, it's not terroism. Terrorism is when a person or group envokes fear among civillians to get what they want from leaders ... However you view the war in Iraq, etc, it is NOT defined as terrorism.
12:53 I thought my speakers were dying, that was unexpected. lol.
Re: Glenn Beck's comment. I think a political youth camp is a little weird myself, and though "Nazi Youth Camps" is not the 1st thing that came to my head when I heard of it, I can understand why it might be for some people.
That last woman "Schlussel" is a heartless bitch. (For anyone interested in the primary source google "Karma?: Norway Camp Breivik Shot Up")
It's a shame these wackos have come to represent the right...
And again... very nice vid :)
focusontheargument 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
not all terrorist are muslims but moste muslims are terrorists
TheAFStudios 2 months ago
lol, one long strawman :)
zamestol 4 months ago
While the right-wing Neo-Cons pretend to protect human rights, freedom, democracy and innocent civilians, the Neo-Con US government has slaughtered more innocent civilians in south-east Asia and the Middle East than any non-state terrorist organization. The right-wing Islamophobe hypocrisy is not just limited to their reaction to the Norway attacks, but this has been going on since the Vietnam war, because almost all Islamophobes endorse US foreign policy to the fullest extent!
DeathToNeoCons 6 months ago
Investigate Pamela Geller [MIRROR]
Watch this sami! Its very troubling! Search and choose the first video!
nouveaumec 6 months ago
@nouveaumec Bitch denied the Bosnian Genocide.
Killzoneguy117 6 months ago
I think the last argument was awesome, its true, they never wanna investigate the root causes of islamic terrorism to prevent it...but in this case they turn a different leaf
KhurshidMJ 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS RIGHT-WING ZIONIST CHRISTIAN TERRORIST SATANIC FUCK JUST BRUTALLY SLAUGHTERED 93 INNOCENT PEOPLE FOR NOTHING. HE IS WORST THAN A MONSTER, HE IS THE SICKEST KILLER ON EARTH.
MOST DERANGED FASCIST ISLAMOPHOBES ARE ZOMBIES WHO HAVE ALREADY LOST ALL HUMANITY & SOUL, THEY BREATHE HATE 24/7, THEY GET PLEASURE FROM PAIN, MISERY & DEATH. THESE WHITE-SUPREMACIST ZIONAZIS ARE DEMONS WITH HATE FOR EVERYONE NOT A CLONE OF THEMSELVES.
iCitiz3nP0vv3R2 6 months ago
Say what you wish in abuse of my religion and I, for my silence towards the idiot is indeed an answer. I am not at a loss for a response but rather, It does not befit the lion to answer the dogs.
HJI146896 6 months ago
Nonsense, it goes without saying that attacks like these are wrong. The right wing is pretty big, this guy was off the deep end. "Right wingers" everywhere aren't responsible for what this guy does. This guy was a lunatic, no one should listen to his reasons, no one should read his manifesto.
mattschol 6 months ago
uuuggghhhhhhhhhh ... sheeeeesh
msginca 6 months ago
The guy who killed all of those people has been proven to take drugs before the attack
Terrorist12341 6 months ago
@FaMingZhe
As a Muslim, comparing me to Hitler is so ironic...
...considering Hitler shared the same ideology about Jews with a Muslim prince/leader who he befriended.
...The Crusades were a reactionary war to Muslims trying to overtake Christian land.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns No, anyone who compared you to Hitler was wrong. You are much worse than Hitler. He was not a scum of the earth because unlike you he knew what he was doing.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@aveyowyns so why did the crusaders overtake eastern orthodox christian land, can you please answer that dumb dumb? hahahaha so funny your silent on it cause you just made an ass of yourself.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aveyowyns ave says: DA CRUSADA DEY MAKE A DEFENSE OF DA CHRISTIN LAND FROM DA MOOZZZZLIMMMM.
me: okay, so why did the crusaders then conquer eastern orthodox christian land, why did they fight their own christian brethren in a civil war?
ave: DA CRUSADA DEY DEFEND DA CHRISTIN LAND FROM DA MOOZZLIM DA CRUSADA GOODO GUY
me: erm, can you please address my point:
ave: DA CRUSADA DEY DA GOOD GUY, DEY FIGHT DA MOOOZLIM TO DEFEND DA CHRISTIN LAND.
me: .......
SamiZaatari 6 months ago 6
@FaMingZhe
I don't need to read the Quran to know what's in it - goof
What whole chapter??? The Quran states - kill them wherever you find them a number of times in different places. Do you then claim that every single chapter in which 'kill them wherever you find them' is found, is about self-defense?
Just silly
*an Islamophobe is someone who has an irrational fear of Islam - Though I do fear Islam, it is not due to irrationality, nor is it the SOLE reason why I voice my opinion in this forum.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
Pot, meet kettle P
moshigirl1 6 months ago
Does it seem to you that right wingers share more attributes to Nazism than Socialists or left wingers do?
iviewthetube 6 months ago
I fear that events like this will occur more frequently in today's volatile climate. The same can be said about 1930's Germany trying to find a group to scapegoat for their economic problems (being the jews). History repeats itself, and it appears that Muslims are now the scapegoat during these turbulent, uncertain times. Expect more shit to hit the fan, followed by more strife between westerners and Muslims. Sometimes it seems like bloodshed is the only way to get a point across.
mariusbleek 6 months ago
@FaMingZhe
That's not an Islamophobic site - it's anti-Islam, there is a difference.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
I always said christian was a synonym for hypocrite. They're willing sheep who believe anything without proof as long as it fits into their bigoted views.
recyard12x 6 months ago
@FaMingZhe
No thanks... you tell me I get my statistics from Islamophobic sites ... well, point me to the Islamophobic site that declares there have been 10 000 Muslim terrorist attacks untruthfully...
Don't expect to come to me with a blatant lie about my character and then demand that I provide sources
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowy I have honest questions for you. Why your "peaceful" religion massacred innocent Jews and Muslims in Jerusalem during Crusades? Why Christian conquistadors massacred Native Americans in the name of Jesus? Why Christian inquision massacred muslims, jews and women during middle-ages? The last question: imagine a schizophrenic blood-thirsty man killing women and children suddenly says that he's good, asks to love everyone and follow him. Would you follow him? Give me honest answers.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@JackSparrowDepp
The Crusades was a response TO Muslims trying to overtake Jerusalem. MUSLIMS were the one's killing Jews, so don't get it twisted. The InquisiTIon was politically motivated, not religiously motivated (point me to a verse in the Bible that declares Christians have the right to kill unbelievers).
Would I follow Mohammad - no, never.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns Your first sentence was enough for me to expose in what kind of fantasy world you are living. The whole educated world knows and bashes the Christian Crusaders for killing innocent Jewish and Muslim people in Jerusalem who were living there together before Crusaders came yet you are telling me that Muslims killed those Jews? Go rewrite the history books and then I'll take you seriously because you'll have something to back up your claims. And yes, u are following ur schizopheric god.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
blah blah blah. Always willing to make excuses for others, but never those you dislike. As usual.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
Christianity needs no excuses - no Muslim can point to a single verse in the Bible commanding Christians to kill unbelievers, so supposed terrorist attacks done in the name of Christianity can easily be distinguished from TRUE Christianity - unlike the countless verses in the Quran commanding Muslims to kill various kinds of unbelievers 'wherever you find them,' as well as your prophet murdering in his wake leading as an example...
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
Yeah, you obviously haven't read the Qur'an: Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.(60:8).
Maybe you should focus more on comprehending what you read than reading into it what you want. You have the same comprehension level of a terrorist.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
You didn't address the verses (I think there are five) that states Muslims have the right to kill unbelievers, the dishonest, and Jews.
"You have the same comprehension level of a terrorist."
LOL ...and you know the comprehension level of a terrorist? If I had compared YOU to a terrorist, I would be condemned of being racist ... it's nice to see Muslims partake in the double standard Leftist media has created.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
Yeah, I did. THey have a right under particular conditions (Like for self defense). Theres nothing wrong with defending yourself.
And no, Im not being a racist or having double standards. I call people who support Osama Bin Laden idiots all the time. I also happen to call people who think like him idiots all the time. Hence, you're an idiot.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
"Self Defense."
Pursuing unbelievers he dishonest, and Jews is NOT an act of self defense. You are right in the fact that there is nothing wrong with defending one's self, but these instances are NOT self defense!
Of course, you missed the point. If I, or anyone else, were to call you a terrorist or compare you to a terrorist in even the most benign manner - they would be considered racist - but you do it to other people?
What you think about my intelligence is of no concern to me
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
What's more, I dislike Islam - not Muslims. In fact I have more sympathy towards the terrorists who've been brainwashed by which your Holy Book was the primary means, thab dishonest and deceitful Muslims like yourself and Sammi who like to pretend the Quaran does not in any way endorse terrorist killings and upholds western values, while calling people who point out said blatant lie 'Islamophobes.'
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
That's because a person with even one brain cell who reads the Qur'an will know it doesn't say that. You really have to either A) Be a moron or B) Be a liar...to conceive the Qur'an being that way.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
You should look up the term 'false dichotomy.'
The Quran states that the persecution of Muslims is worse than the slaughter of unbelievers.
The Quran states that the day of judgement will not come until Muslims fight or rid the world of Jews.
The Quran states that Muslims should not take Jews and Christians for friends.
...and on and on it goes.
...But like I said - comparing the terrorist attack of one right-wing fundamentalist to the Muslim 10 000 is laughable.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
Im aware of the term given the fact that I hold a BA in Western Philosophy and am currently finishing two MAs, one of which is in Western Phil and the other in Islamic Studies. SO. no need to look it up. Your evasiveness is rather telling. I show you a counter example to explain the nuance of the directives in the Qur'an towards non-believers and you just ignore it to claim something else.
Once again, another sign of your failure to understand or argue your own position.
DawahFilms 6 months ago 3
@DawahFilms
I care not for your education - as you make it clear that even the educated can be deceive and work to deceive others (LOL - let's not forget that lying for the sake of Islam is mandated in the Quran!)
I am well aware of the fact that Mohammad had some benign things to say about unbelievers, but as you and I are both aware, they are abrogated by the later verse that command Muslims to slay unbelievers.
*You speak of my evasiveness and you blatantly ignore the content I listed?? lolz
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
So you're an idiot. As I said. You care not for people who are educated more on subjects you know little about. Drop out of school then.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
Yeah, you major in philosophy but couldn't have a half-decent conversation if it killed you: look up ad hominem!
Your assumption that I am an idiot, or that I do not care for people who are 'educated,' does not make my arguments any less valid.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns You have no arguments to be valid or invalid in the first place. Nobody takes you seriously here. You are a brainwashed christian girl living somewhere in the forest. Go hunt animals instead of spamming muslim videos with your bullshit.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
You didn't make an argument. You made accusations and avoided objections.
As usual. And I need not have a conversation with an idiot. You're merely my plush toy.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
I did make an argument; it being that one conservative terrorist in Norway does not change the fact that Islam is a religion that supports terrorism - 10 000 in the last year to be exact.
The only objection you provided was that the verses condoning terrorism were to be understood under the context of self-defense; and my objection was that these verse were NOT understood under the context of self-defense, and the verses commanding Muslims to live at peace with others...
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
And your objection was bullshit as usual because you have yet to provide evidence to the contrary. You just say things and then expect people to believe you. You are not an Islamic scholar. You don't even have any basic understanding of the religion. All the crap you're saying is copy and paste from placed like Jihad-Watch or Atlus Shrugs. And even if that was the ONLY conservative attack (lets not mention the countless wars and deaths of civilians in their name as well)...
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
I did provide evidence, you goof! Verses showing kindness to unbelievers are abrogated by later verse commanding Muslims to kill unbelievers, Jews, the untrustworthy, those who leave Islam, idolaters, etc, etc.
I have never visited Jihad-Watch or Atlas Shrugs... though I don't think telling you otherwise will make a difference.
I don't just expect 'people' to believe me, I expect YOU, the Muslims, quick to flaunt his degrees, to know what I'm already talking about!
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
I mean, I'm really surprised you have the gall to even challenge me. You really must be living in your own little deluded world if you honestly believe you have the same intellectual capacity to take me on. It's like a midget trying to punch a basketball player in the face. You're really reaching for something you can't or never will have. If you really want to be at my level you need to pursue that sort of education. In the meantime, you're just someone for me to laugh at.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
@DawahFilms
You have yet to provide more than ad hominem attacks about my character and intelligence, so if there is some kind of 'intellectual capacity' to be seen from you, I have yet to see it. Do you really think you can bully me with your 'degrees.'
I am pursuing your kind of education, you joke. I'm in my third year at the University of Windsor getting my English and Creative Writing degree and minoring in Philosophy! A quick look at my profile would've told you the same!
aveyowyns 6 months ago
...were abrogated by verses written later, commanding Muslims to 'kill unbelievers' wherever they are found, and not to take pagans for friends...
To which you responded with fallacies and insults.
I would find your belief in not needing to have 'a conversation with an idiot,' if you had not responded to me in the first place, and then continued the discussion for more than a day!
I'm a plush toy that is better at having conversation than you, a uni graduate, so that's more insulting to you!
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
...you still can't compare. Your response to me was to bring up a fallacy that I didn't even commit, attempt to lecture me about my own religion when I'm actually studying it formally in an Islamic country, and then when I correct you to say that I am LYING because you believe my religion commands me to lie to you. Btw, that's called "poisoning the well", something Im sure you haven't wikipediaed yet Ms. Internet superhero.
Im only responding to you because you're entertaining.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
The fallacies you committed were the 'ad hominem attack' (I think you're stupid, therefore you're wrong), and the false dichotomy (that the only way I could understand the Quran in the way I do would make me either an idiot or a liar).
I did not claim that because the Quran endorses lying for Islam that you were therefore lying ... I only mentioned it as an addition to the crap-load of crap within the Quran.
No, you don't find me entertaining, you find me infuriating. I find YOU entertaining!
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns he finds you ANNOYING. not infuriating, but ANNOYING. Because you do not know ANYTHING about Islam. It is an idiot, who talks about things he doesnot even know. Please talk about stuff that you know well.
KhurshidMJ 6 months ago
@KhurshidMJ
Thanks!
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns the crusade was a response to Muslims trying to take Jerusalem? lol, you do know Jerusalem was already under Muslim rule for centuries? haha, that is truly funny, making history up to try and justify something, right wingers are known for that though.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari
It is your book that allows for Muslims to lie for the sake of Islam, so please.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns You are stupid as hell. It would be better if Sami blocked you!
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@aveyowyns btw, if the crusades were defensive to end Muslim conquest, why did the Crusaders end up in a civil war with the eastern orthodox Church, which led the Crusaders to conquer and take their Christian brethren land, the very same thing they were supposedly fighting against, to defend Christian land from conquest, yet the Crusaders took the land from the orthodox Christians, or are you so ignorant you weren't aware about this part of the Crusaders history? wahahaha
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari
The Crusades was REACTIONARY to Muslims trying to take Christian land.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns Idiotic woman, go learn history. Jerusalem belonged to Jews and Muslims when Crusaders attacked.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@aveyowyns lol, what a way to ignore everything i said, why didn't you address the part about the crusaders starting a civil war with the orthodox church, and conquering eastern orthodox land? now address that point please, or just admin your stupid and never knew that.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
Great rant, akhi.
DawahFilms 6 months ago
Comment removed
DrXoz 6 months ago
94 per cent of all terrorist attacks at least between 1980 and 2005 came from non-Muslims! The pie chart is on the FBI's (of all places) website and loonwatch has a piece on it.
The small percentage that happen to make it on the news are blown up for various political agendas. So when someone says most terrorist attacks come from Muslims, they're clearly sheeple only listening and believing everything their media mummy tells them.
EphemeralAbode 6 months ago
The media didn't focus on Brievik bcos it doesn't suit their causes. It should have been on the news and talked about for days, since it was such a tragic attack.
If u look thru history, u can see that there has always been a group of ppl that were stigmatized and humiliated by those who deem themselves superior.
How much terrorism took place during the crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, on civilians in Iraq, Afgan.., Bosnia?& when Europeans exterminated the native Americans and Aborigines?
EphemeralAbode 6 months ago
@FaMingZhe
sources.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If the person who killed 90+ people in Norway was a Muslim, the Press would have declared him as terrorist. For now though, he is just an 'Assailant ', 'Attacker' (Reuters), 'Gunman' (BBC, CNN & Al Jazeera). Looks like 'Terrorist' is a name reserved for Muslims? The US Dept of State calls it an 'Act of Violence', Not an 'Act of Terrorism'. Share this status and let the world know about hypocrites
xdeadromeox 6 months ago
I think you need new glasses dude
Sharia4Pluto 6 months ago
Europe really got paranoia about muslims taking over their land.. COME ON! WE ARE ALL OF THE HUMAN RACE.. Everyone has the choice to live where they want!
KaranfiLL88 6 months ago
In a recent Onion video they said something profound... yes I know the Onion isn't real -_-
They ended with "in other news, the equivalent of five americans were killed in Afghanistan today."
"The equivalent of..."
It might be a comedy channel, but this attitude seems to be a real attitude nowadays.
romanali1 6 months ago 3
@romanali1
5 Americans dead= 2 Afghan weddings+1 Afghan school + 14 Afghani boys collecting firewood
Its all basic arithmatic.
jeb31415 6 months ago
Pamela Geller is an total idiot but if you think you don't have your fair share of nutters in the Islamic world you're kidding yourself. In England we have Anjem Choudary who has previously blamed the 9/11 attack squarely on America and says the victims weren't innocent as they weren't Muslim. At the moment he's trying to enforce Shariah in parts of London. He's one of many, so we don't have to "imagine" if a Muslim did the same.
Denethorable 6 months ago
9:20 "They don't look like muslims"
LOL How can you SEE what a person belief on his looks/color, etc?? Can you see the color of athiesm for instance=? ;)
Islam is a belief.. not ethnicity or race.
zhrmod 6 months ago
Great vid
zhrmod 6 months ago
I was surprised at how little media attention this got. If it was a Muslim, then it would have been none stop media for weeks about it.
qwertyfshag 6 months ago
SUBSCRIBED!!!
chocolatedonut31 6 months ago
MY FAVOURITE TIME FRAME :D (smile)!
8:00-8:16 ... And by the way I encourage you too look at that picture. I mean Pamala Geller..I mean I know you've done plastic sergery, but have they done plastic surgery with your eyes? You can't look properly?
ROFL (Rolling On Floor Laughing).
SamiZaatari I know you aren't the kind of guy that likes to insult but your insult is warranted :P (sweet).
LampPlaceThing 6 months ago
Right Wing or Left Wing. If a person is prepared to kill innocent people to justify their own ends, then that person is not a good person.
Imavegetableful 6 months ago
Excellent video.
gabiotta 6 months ago
Pamela Gellar. she is a freaking rasist in the first dargee.
Hamzah41081 6 months ago
أخي سامي
والله تقف حروفي وتعجز كلماتي عن شكرك على كل ما تقدمه للدفاع عن المسلمين
اسأل الله الكريم رب العرش العظيم ان يرفع قدرك ويعلي شأنك في الدنيا والاخره ويجعل جميع اعمالك وفيديواتك في ميزان حسناتك ويفرج همومك ويحقق امانيك ويرزقك من حيث لا تحتسب إنه على كل شيء قدير
اعذرني انا اكتب لك بالعربي لأن اللغه العربيه كما تعلم هي الأبلغ وهي الأجمل
وكل عام وانت بخير
saudiflag3000 6 months ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1 Right wing terrorist attack vs 10 000 Muslim terrorist attacks, in the last ten years = no comparison
Said terrorist was not American, so to compare the rightwing agenda of a Swede to the rightwing agenda of an American is utterly stupid.
It would be one thing if these attacks happened in America, but they didn't! Rightwingers in America need not 'react' to the terrorist bombing because that it was completely evil is obvious to us and most Americans, the same CANNOT be said about Muslims/Islam
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
what you mean to say is 1 9/11 and 10000 attacks of america on innocent people right? open your eyes mun. look what america has done to the world. in the past 200 years and in the past 20 years.
muhammadahmad1994 6 months ago
@muhammadahmad1994
No, that's not what I mean to say...
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns
i was being sarcastic mun ~_~
muhammadahmad1994 6 months ago
@muhammadahmad1994
...and I was being purposely obtuse you goof.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns yeah, he wasn't an american right winger, american right wingers prefer to invade entire countries like Iraq and have very grand imperialist ideas, this right wing terrorist actually advocated against imperialism, so true, their not the same, american right wingers are more crazy.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago 39
@SamiZaatari "american right wingers prefer to invade entire countries like Iraq and have very grand imperialist ideas"
Well, American right wingers tend to be almost as superstitious as muslims and when you think God is on your side the way to imperialist ideas is fairly short. Although to be fair, the US has nothing like the Jihadist world domination doctrine forming the very basis of their religion. They at least see the need to have secular excuses, which hold them back a bit.
Gnomefro 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@SamiZaatari However, you're completely missing the mark with respect to Iraq. Iraq was a necessary retaliation to prevent further Jihadist attacks on US soil after 9/11. It had absolutely nothing to do with imperialism and everything to throw some major losses into the faces of superstitious clowns who would otherwise hold that Allah was with them and pressing further attacks. At least Bush understood the Jihadist mentality enough to do that one thing right.
Gnomefro 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Gnomefro attacking iraq was to prevent further jihadist attacks???? have you been smoking that crack bush was???? there was no jihadists from iraq planning to attack the U.S., all the jihadists in iraq established themselves there after the invasion and they became active. as for having nothing to do with imperialism, thats why their building the biggest american embassy in the world, setting up american bases, oh yeah no imperialism here folks, hahah you should become a comedian.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago 33
@SamiZaatari An embassy has nothing to do with imperialism. Imperialists don't set up embassies, they set up capitals.
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol the embassy is a mini city incase you didn't know, it's not just any embassy, it's the largest one they are making, and add this to the fact that they are also building military bases over there (a point you ignored).
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari They make it that big so that they can have a buffer zone bc it's likely to be attacked. Military bases, so what? We establish military bases with the consent of the locals. It would only be imperialism if we were taxing them. It's bullshit that we're paying for their defense, the majority are happy to have us.
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol with the consent of the local people? BSSSSSSSS the iraqis don't want any foreign military base in their country, who in this blue world are you kidding????? poll after poll shows iraqis want every foreign soldier OUT of their country. you yourself said the embassy is going to be like a buffer zone, well smart guy, if the people wanted you there, why is there a risk of an attack? nobody wants you there.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari Well the Iraqis in power obviously know better. They could score many political points by pushing the US out(and some of them are trying to), but they know it's better for Iraq to have a US base there. Think about it,; they have virtually no threat of foreign(Iran) invasion. Why is there a risk of attack on the embassy? As your video addressed; it only takes 1 ultra-nationalist to launch an attack.
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol iran ain't never going to invade iraq, with or without the U.S., why in the world would Iran invade Iraq when many of the Iraqi politicians are good friends with Iran? also if Iran wanted to invade Iraq, they would have done it in the 90's when Iraq was under sanctions and had the whole world against them, and were in a huge state of weakness. Iran doesn't even have a record of invading other countries, so all this talk of Iran invading this or that is pure fantasy myth to cause fear
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari Saddam pretended to have a nuclear program precisely because he was worried about an Iranian invasion. Iran was on the offensive for the majority of the Gulf War. US military bases around the world have brought about an unprecedented level of global stability and what do we get for it?
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol yeah iran were on the offensive for the majority of the gulf war, a war they didn't start. U.S. bases have brought global stability??? you do know men like bin laden created their groups precisely as a result of U.S. bases in their country.....yeah, lot's of stability!
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari And now he's dead. Yes, it is a lot of stability. A terrorist attack is nothing compared to full scale conventional warfare. Did you notice we haven't had much of that lately? You can't just take that for granted.
mattschol 6 months ago
@mattschol no terrorist attack true, but you do know, they planned one major attack to suck you into a long continual war, which is what they got in afghanistan, their intent was to get you in a long war to basically bleed you dry, which is what is happening, the wars are costing so much and are have a major impact on economy, so things are still going according to plan in their minds as your still fighting an unwinnable war in afghanistan that is simply costing billions.
SamiZaatari 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari You're quite right.
mattschol 6 months ago
@Gnomefro "Iraq was a necessary retaliation" The flip side that attack on U.S, was due to American harboring of terror carried out by Israel in Palestine and continue to support illegal occupation of Internationally recognized Palestinians territories. If there is logic and rational in your comments then apply same logic and rational to those muslims who attacked U.S as well. Likewise all Iraqis have more reason to come after America for death and destruction carried out on the Iraqis soil.
micheal74rich 6 months ago
@Gnomefro Bush served satan.
KaranfiLL88 6 months ago
@Gnomefro Your a fucken moron. Bush senior always wanted to invade Iraq and so did Israel. Iraq had no links to the terrorist attacks. Saddam was a US ally. He had no WMDS. And most importantly Bush JNR apologised for Iraq confirming it was a mistake. So wake the fuck up take the blindfold off of your eyes.
Unity4allhumans 6 months ago
@Gnomefro Do you have any evidence from the US or neutral parties that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist attack? Bring me the evidence and I will believe it.
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@Gnomefro ''Iraq was a necessary retaliation to prevent further Jihadist attacks on US soil after 9/11. It had absolutely nothing to do with imperialism''
Oh God... how blind can you get kid?
slickrickdarula 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari
Obama is a Leftist and he didn't end the war in Iraq.
You clearly don't know the definition of imperialism - rightwing does not equal = imperialism.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari
Pamella Geller is crazy, a fringe group figurehead just like your average far right Islamist wacko mouthpiece such as anjem choudary. So, the extreme right are hypocrites as well as crazy, big surprise!
Iraq was invaded because it was a threat to it's neighbours and Afghanistan because it allowed Islamist extremists to wage war on countries with impunity.
Megiddon 6 months ago
@aveyowyns Your right wingers attack their own country/own people... how crazy is that?
KaranfiLL88 6 months ago
@KaranfiLL88
load of cow dung
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns sure...
KaranfiLL88 6 months ago
@KaranfiLL88
indeed.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns Take your fake bull shit elsewhere. Islamic terrorism only make up 0.04% of todays terrorist attacks. And rightwingers and separatist make a whopping 80% of terrorist attacks. Stop spewing infactual media fed propaganda. I will live my life standing for truth no matter where it takes me.
Unity4allhumans 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Unity4allhumans
Site your sources.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
@aveyowyns what do you call the millions of muslims that got killed by America and Israel in the last ten years?
I guess you do not consider it "terrorist". right?
This is the irony brother sami was talking about. you just proved his point.
pantherlake2002 6 months ago
@pantherlake2002
Muslims aren't killed by Americans - Iraqis who happen to be Muslim are killed by Americans.
No, it's not terroism. Terrorism is when a person or group envokes fear among civillians to get what they want from leaders ... However you view the war in Iraq, etc, it is NOT defined as terrorism.
Sami never makes any points.
aveyowyns 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Salam aleykom:) Ramadan mubarak !:) read quran on this site everybody and learn about islam !
quran.com
KurdishMuslimGirl 6 months ago 3
I'm proud of you ^_^
MsMayMOoO 6 months ago
Great point at 4:44 Sami. This is one of your best videos I have ever seen, well done calling out the hypocrisy of the right.
AtheistAussie 6 months ago
12:53 I thought my speakers were dying, that was unexpected. lol.
Re: Glenn Beck's comment. I think a political youth camp is a little weird myself, and though "Nazi Youth Camps" is not the 1st thing that came to my head when I heard of it, I can understand why it might be for some people.
That last woman "Schlussel" is a heartless bitch. (For anyone interested in the primary source google "Karma?: Norway Camp Breivik Shot Up")
It's a shame these wackos have come to represent the right...
a7neu 6 months ago
@SamiZaatari you should link to blackplight4u he had an awsome vid on the subject
0ptimusbibIe 6 months ago
FINALLY
TeenageIronman 6 months ago
Who could dislike this?
bigchicken24 6 months ago
@bigchicken24... ...2 animals
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@JackSparrowDepp LMAO! do they have opposable thumbs?
bigchicken24 6 months ago
@bigchicken24 Yes, they do
JackSparrowDepp 6 months ago
@bigchicken24 haters gonna hate :D
Y3M37H 6 months ago
@Y3M37H It's like people get up every morning trying to dislike his videos on purpose!
bigchicken24 6 months ago