Added: 2 years ago
From: enaB3031
Views: 16,920
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • best lume on a watch would have to be ball hydrocarbon or engineer master 2 diver, it will stay luminescent for 25 years and never go dim

  • Rolex havent used tritium since like the 60's or something close to that, they use superluminova made by RC TRITEC in switzerland 

  • i never knew i could watch a video of glowing bits of metal so many times without losing interest.

  • Thank you for this great vid! Nice comparison :)

  • Video is very good.

    Congratulations on your fabulous collection and just ignore ignorant (and wrong) comments.

  • @enab3031 Sir you are mistaken. To this day ROLEX uses super luminova, they have never used tritium tubes or lume. If you are looking for tritium go with Luminox/Traser/Nite or Traser. These do have tritium tube which produce steady glow that stays even all the time. None of the watches on this video look like replicas, they are all gen. Seiko's and Citizens are known for having fabulous lume that lasts a long time.

  • in my opinion some of your watches are replica.even my 300euro citizen eco drive titanium diver 300m do a lot better and also my 1000euro citizen signature beats by far all your watches whan comes to lume.as far as i know rolex use a T25(radioactive tritium formula) compound instead superluminova and must glow ALLWAYS in any light condition. many expensive watches use this compound, if im paying thousand and thousands of euros on a watch, means i have a verry very high expectations abt lume.

  • @mariamik104

    I appreciate your interesting in my posting ^^

    First of all, I can not accept that "my watchs are replica".

    I always buy brand new one at Authorized Dealer

    or Duty Free shop.

    I never trade with used watch.

    So, there is no possiblity to have replica. ^^

    If you could serch my another video as my nick name,

    then you are able to find very specific image by closeup shot.

  • @mariamik104 Anyway, I can tell you that my test is not perfect. Maybe the lighting isn't equally to all watch. And Camera Work it's not like a eye seeing. The iris of eye is very dynamic an auto active. In getting dark situation, iris of eye open there size more and more. But, camera set of shooting was fixed. Iris, shutter, sensetive of cmos... all settings were fixed. So, it's not like a eye. In the video, some of watchs lost all light. but I could saw with my eyes
  • @mariamik104

    Intro of the video, I said it is just for fun,

    and the result is not quite right.

    It was korean, may you couldn't understand.

    it's just compare nightglow bright.

    No running time test that eyes can see it.

  • I actually own three out of the bunch (the JLC, IWC, and Panerai), and yeah, your results mirror my experience to a T. It's worth noting, however, that both the JLC and IWC are stll legible at 5:00am after going all night without a charge, even though they may not glow as bright as my Panerai (to say nothing of my UTS 3000M or B-1). Oh, and yes, the JLC is my favorite.

  • Exellent videos! Well done! I would pick the deap sea though

  • Looks like the ugliest (to me)the steelfish has the most luminescence, I still take JLC over all of them.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more